I want to hear him just once say “in which we liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiive” but for 30 seconds. So long that even fans of the channel are left scratching their heads.
The voice. Him, Sea and Butler. Perfect for bedtime. But this one might be best because it has the theta/delta wave binaural beat music in the background.
Another mention of my favorite odd element, Beryllium. While it is produced inside stars, it is also burned off there as well, which leads to it being rare. In fact, most of the beryllium in the universe, wasn't made in the heart of a star, but instead was produced by the cosmic ray induced spallation of heavier elements. So we take this rare metal made by cosmic rays, and use it it all kinds of special nuclear, nuclear medicine, thermal and tooling applications, without really thinking about where it came from.
@@swetsTV Yes. There are actually decent amounts in the upper soil layers, because quite a bit is created in the upper atmosphere, as cosmic rays slam into oxygen atoms high in the atmosphere and produce many elements, including Beryllium. One created, those elements slowly drift to earth, as a sort of meteoric rain.
Not like oil and water, no, but potentially we could have something similar to the leidenfrost effect (think water droplet on a very hot pan). The annihilation of some matter/antimatter could act as a cushion, just like water being turned into steam on a hot pan acts as a cushion
Its possible gravity could work differently for the two forms of matter and there are even experiments looking to test this though they are in practice complicated by the relative weakness of gravity. However given that magnetic fields were how we first detected antimatter (positrons) we can effectively rule out a magnetic contribution to the matter antimatter discrepancy as the only way to tell a positron is a positron short of it annihilating with an electron is to measure how it deflects within a magnetic field.
@@Dragrath1 Why would experiments be difficult? It is true that gravity is weak, but small amounts of antimatter have been synthesized here on earth. They have to be kept in a vacuum to stop annihilating. Turn off the magneto-optic trap, or whatever it is they use to keep antimatter floating and you can measure the time it takes for the particles to annihilate by hitting into the walls of the vacuum chamber, also locate whether the antimatter impacted the top or bottom walls. Afaik it's already known that antimatter, while having the opposite spin and charge, still has positive mass and thus interacts with gravity like normal matter
6:55 - Although purely theoretically possible, that scenario is highly improbable. All the galaxies, stars, stuff... we see in the observable Universe is with high probability matter (no anti-matter) because if it weren't so, we would see the very prominent signs of the annihilation process all around the observable Universe.
It has been said that antimatter resembles matter that is traveling backwards in time. Given that, one could guess that the antimatter produced at the Big Bang went "the other direction" in time from that point.
Genuine good point, dude! Prof. Hawking got me thinking of all that Arrow of Time stuff too, and all the symmetries involved in the reversal scenario. Cool stuff 🧠💪
If anti matter goes back in time starting at 0 in reverse direction from us, then it would be negative time to us but linear and forward moving to them.
Hi J.M. ! Two things plague my mind. The first is the Gravity thing: will we ever in our lifetimes see a complete Standard Model that incorporates gravity successfully into its equations? Thanks to insomnia I literally stay awake pondering this. The other thought that totally ruins my brain is the subject of human memorecall; how it works ( something something Hippocampus!) , how such memories are stored, accessed, filed, etc. Still a side- subject about which, despite such marvels as the Human Genome map, we still know very little about this. Keep up the Excellent stuff, sir! 💎
We are preprogrammed to do a lot of things, these will eventually be figured out in the HGP I believe. One of the things we are wired to do is recognize the smell and voice of our primary caregivers at birth, and when our optic nerve finishes growing we quickly learn to recognize them. Our brains are pre-wired to pick up the frequencies of different sounds in parallel which allows us to do a sort of Fournier Analysis and recognize frequently repeated sounds because the brain cell grows stronger with use. From there certain combinations of sounds can be identified as things you can see around you, important things like mama and dada, bottle, juice. Everything builds off of previous memorized thoughts. If you pay attention to any of the current AI stuff they basically teach by pattern recognition so they show the AI 50,000 pictures of tables and then it can recognize a table even one it's never seen before. But to us a table is much more than an image, it's a place in our home, it has a function, we sit at it and eat or do homework, we set the table and clear the table, it has a wide flat surface and chairs around it so now when we go into someone else's house we recognize their table because it is also a wide flat surface, with chairs we can sit at the table and eat and it is in the kitchen or a dedicated room right off the kitchen. When we want to learn something totally new for example reading we have to train our brain to recognize this visual input to this sound. We have to do this many times while the brain cells grow the right connections between the visual and auditory sections of your brain and strengthen them, but again it's all in relation to things we already know. You don't teach a child 'hippocampus' as a complete word, you teach each letters then small single syllable words then combine syllables to make more complex words. So a table is not a single brain cell, it's a place, it's certain functions, it's a shape, it's a sound, it's specific letters. It's all about those preprogrammed responses and for creatures such as us who have parents we automatically mimic our parents to learn. Lions do not typically attack people because they learn what is food from their mother and we are not it. But if one becomes hungry enough to try it and discovers we are pretty tasty it will continue to eat us and teach it's young, so great effort is put into hunting down any lion that eats a person. So the big problems as we saw it in AI is that preprogrammed weights or strength of certain neural connections that we couldn't know and the roll-model/mimic problem, that we had no adults to teach the child.
Bear in mind that Gravity doesn't really exist; it's an effect of mass on Spacetime, & not a thing in itself...sort of like ice - you can't have it without water but you won't get it without low temp, so it's derivative...
John, I hate to tell you, but missing socks are the sole doing of the sock goblin, and for some reason or another he replaces them with extra Tupperware lids.
Yes, but the sock goblin has to be storing his loot somewhere. Likewise, there must be some method of Tupperware lid generation that we cannot currently fathom.
Is there a reason the missing matter couldn't just be outside of the 93 billion lightyear sphere that is our universe? Early inflation seems like it would make that probable and we will just never be able to see it.
Scientists could probably come up with all kinds of reasons, number one reason being we just dont know what's beyond that point because that's all the further we're able to see, making it so we arent even certain if the edge of the universe is actually the edge of the universe. It's entirely possible there's even more stars and galaxies lighting up the space we cant see.
First thing you have to do is come up with some models for why our neck of the woods is unique or at least noticeably different than all or some others. It's better to assume we not special to assume we are.
Some stupid article said that space is actually beige. No I don't know how they got there. But now I wonder if our universe isn't just a light bulb where baryonic matter is the exhaust matter of our universe consuming itself.
I really want to watch it, but have to hold as its better to watch while sleeping when nothing else is on ur mind. Man 2-3 uploads a week by jmg doesn't seem enough content because it's such good quality.
For the missing baryonic matter, how do the estimates for total baryonic matter present today account for the likelihood that some (unknown) portion of the total universe is beyond our event horizon?
There are really smart people in that universe wondering about the missing 5% of matter and trying to understand the discrepancies in their gravitational calculations.
It IS all matter, the only difference is the electrical charge. We call it antimatter because we have a preference bias since we are made of the baryonic matter that is the predominant kind matter throughout this universe.
@@burningchrome70 I think you're confusing antimatter with dark matter and dark energy. 95% of the universe is dark matter and dark energy, not antimatter.
antimatter galaxy's could be separated by VAST distances, you think the visible universe is a long way, compared to the antimatter galaxy's, it's just down the road. our entire visible universe could lie in a matter rich area, hmm, there could be areas the size of our visible universe that are far more rich in matter, the sky's lit up, packed with galaxies. problem is without FTL i don't think it would be provable, our visible universe is a very small sample size of the universe.
. . . And it is getting LARGER by the day. Professor Saul Perlmutter must have freaked when the number-crunching agreed. One of the cooler Nobels given out. 👍
If the cosmic background radiation map is anything to go by, at the very least matter is fairly evenly spread out throughout the entire universe. Though that still leaves the possibility that the antimatter part is just way outside of the observable part.
For some reason people don't know that Einstein repeatedly said that singularities are not possible. Wherever you have an astronomical quantity of mass "dilation" (sometimes called gamma or y) will occur. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" Einstein wrote "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the "Schwarzchild singularities" (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The"Schwarzchild singularities" do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." If you look at a common relativity graph with velocity on the horizontal line and dilation on the vertical, the phenomenon is clear, even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated. There is no place in the universe where mass is more concentrated than at the center of a galaxy. 99.8% of the mass in our solar system is in the sun. 99.9% of the mass in an atom is in the nucleus. If these norms are true for galaxies than we can infer that there is 100's of trillions of solar masses at the center of common spiral galaxies. There is no way to know through observation, there is far too much interference, dilation and gravitational lensing. High mass means high momentum. If we attribute a radius to these numbers than we can calculate that relativistic velocities exist in these regions. The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. In some sublime way that mass is all around us because as the graph shows we are still connected to it. The greatest mystery in science is the abnormally high rotation rates of stars in spiral galaxies (the reason for the theory of dark matter). It was recently discovered that low mass galaxies (like NGC 1052-DF2) have normal star rotation rates. This is what relativity would predict because there is an insufficient quantity of mass to achieve relativistic velocities. This is virtual proof that dilation is the governing phenomenon at galactic centers. There can be no other realistic explanation for this fact. Einstein formulated relativity before the existence of galaxies was confirmed. It's clear the mass is dilated though the galaxy and not the universe as a whole. Black holes were popularized by television in the 1960's and belief in them gradually came to be despite the fact that Einstein said they cannot exist and there was no evidence. The notion that there is a way to take a picture of the galactic center is absurd. As per relativity an observer would have to exist at or near it's momentum. If you pose the question "why can't we see light from the galactic center?" The modern answer would be because gravitational forces there are so strong that not even light can escape (even though the mass of the photon is 0) Einstein's answer would be because the mass there is dilated relative to an Earth bound observer. Einstein's answer explains the greatest mystery in science. All images and data from galactic centers is in line with relativity.
A question I have is about time. Is an hour after the Big Bang the same as an hour today. Yes it’s technically the same length but we know time can speed or slow down. Then if you know time varies, then is the time to the beginning is it really 13.8bn based on our current time or is it older.
You can imagine a long-distance conversation between a matter galaxy and an anti-matter galaxy: "You're the anti-matter." "No, _you're_ the anti-matter." "No, I tell you _you're_ the anti-matter. No returns, so there!"
Two small thoughts: 1-- Look into the research concerning potential "symmetrons". These are hypothetical particles that could explain why most galaxies end up shaped in discs and not in other, more spherical forms. IF there is a mirrored "anti-universe" racing away from us in time from the Big Bang, symmetrons might explain the expansion of the universe, then, if the Big Bang was somehow forced into the rough shape of a hyperboloid, with the universe separating itself out into two roughly equal saddle-shaped projections of space where the farther you go, the farther you CAN go. 2-- Or, the flaw in baryonic matter and anti-matter could simply be down to mathematics itself. There are some things that negative numbers can't do, quite literally due to how multiplication and division work. It could be that matter and anti-matter work much the same way, that the math of anti-matter is messed up enough that it shows in the atomic droplet modeling of atomic nuclei. Meaning more anti-matter elements of the Periodic Table become unstable and radioactive, and/or simply disintegrate at far different rates than normal baryonic matter.
@@JohnMichaelGodier When anyone claims unexplainable events COULD be aliens, they might as well claim it could be angels or could be Zorgs from the 5th dimension. It's pure science fiction, and one step off tinfoil hat territory. The entire concept of alien life is made up, we have zero evidence. Now I'm more than willing to agree that life might exist elsewhere just based on the numbers, but that's life, not intelligent life capable of breaking physics and traveling the stars and having any interest in our primitive planet and species. If you can't see that then you are biased.
No, it's advancing a hypothesis that an unexplained phenomenon could be due to aliens, which is perfectly reasonable since we are someone else's aliens. We self prove that intelligent life is possible in the universe. What we've done is put a taboo on the word alien, let the UFO people have the word, and put ourselves into a position where we could walk along a beach and spot a discarded Pepsi bottle, and then do everything we possibly can to convince ourselves it's a weird clam because we don't want to be associated with the word "artificial". This sad state of affairs puts science into a realm worse than religion or woo, it puts it into the territory of lying to one's self and others ... just because of the baggage of a word. And here is bias. You used the distance argument. The problem with that argument is two-fold. One we do not have a complete understanding of physics. We only know a couple disparate sections of it, which we interpret as prohibitions. But the bias here is that we think of crossing spacetime from the perspective of an organism that lives about 80 years. If you live 10,000 years, that changes. If you're a machine that doesn't care about time, you can fill the galaxy with copies of yourself within a few million years at sub light speeds. This is what predicates the Fermi paradox, since on long times scales space travel is so EASY, then aliens should be evident everywhere. So Fermi asked, where are they? And it's true, we should expect to see evidence of aliens commonly and it should be no surprise if and when we do. Yet, somehow, we've made it a surprise for arbitrary taboo reasons. Likewise the distance argument wholesale ignores the reality of General Relativity somehow. It just tosses it into the trashcan willy nilly. That weirdness aside, get up to relativistic speeds and you can cross most of the observable universe within a human lifetime, if you're willing to travel into the far future in the process within your frame of reference. As humans, we don't like that because we can't travel back in time, but that's an anthropocentric bias. Who said an alien cares about what time it exists in? The answer is no one because no one knows. And that's why I've been making more alien content, though I always have. The first video on this channel was about Tabby's Star, people seem to forget that. But regardless, we need to bust down the taboo and get it the hell out of science and openly discuss the very real possibility of alien life like adults or we most definitely will miss it by calling the Pepsi bottle a weird clam. In fact, in three specific cases that I know if, we may have done that already. More often than not, whenever the word alien goes on the table as an explanation for something, the study of that object stops for fear of career damage for breaking science's holy taboo. I will not condone or enable it.
@@JohnMichaelGodier You have completely convinced yourself that this is true. I'm sorry but this has dissolved into mental illness, that or you have thoroughly lied to yourself about your motivations. Let's not pretend that there is nothing to be gained from coddling up to the "Roswell" crowd. And I saw your Tabby's Star videeo, and most videos since. You never once insinuated that it was aliens, only explored the possibility. And even if you had, there is still a big difference between alien life in their own system, and alien life here. Is there a chance? Yes, but even if the odds are high, that's still about a 1 in 4 quadrillion chance(yes I pulled that number out of my ass). Ask any mathematician about those odds and they will laugh directly in your face. All of this leaves 3 possibilities. 1. You're wrong but think you're right. 2. You know you're wrong and are intentionally being dishonest.(Either with yourself, or your audience) 3. You're right, and I'm wrong. (And so is everything we know about the universe.) You don't have to be a mathematician to understand those odds.
If we can only see part of the Universe and we have no idea how much of it we CAN’T see, how can we conjecture that any matter is missing? Is it not possible that the “missing” matter is simply “out there” in the part of the Universe we cannot see? (I love this channel)
I think that time is a physical dimension like a superfluid and we're moving through it at close to the speed of the superfluid itself, but anything with mass creates drag or resistance through the superfluid which slows it's passage through time for the object, and therefore for the object of mass time is moving at a slower rate. A singularity is so massive that it can no longer move through time at all, the flow of time stops at the singularity and only moving faster than the superfluid will allow you to get away from it, which is impossible. It means that the singularity of a black hole is indeed a wormhole connecting the past and the future in one single location, from the day the singularity first formed to the day it evaporates where time stops, but it's not traversable as the superfluid flow of time has also come to a halt. Anything without mass like a photon has no drag through the superfluid of time, so it can move through space and experience no time at all, ie C, and from the perspective of the photon time doesn't exist. Being in orbit of a massive object is to be dragged through time with the massive object, hence the reduced flow of time of the massive object also dragging the orbing object into the slower flow of time the closer the smaller object gets to it. Humans standing on a planet like Earth means we're objects of mass moving through time slightly slower than we would be if we were an object further away from the planet and away from the planet's drag through time superfluid of time. If you wanted to go back in time you would need to be an object with negative mass able to move through the superfluid of time faster than time is moving in the direction of the future. Therefore, the Higgs boson resists the superfluidic flow of time, like an electron slows down as a super conductor is warmed up.
So perhaps we really could put time in a bottle? Only joking of course- that’s an interesting concept! It harkens back to old theories of ether and such, while still maintaining consistency with scientific proofs we have in the modern day.
On the topic of anti universe, you should investigate the "Janus model", which is an expansion of the Einstein's field equations and adds anti-universe. It's been proposed by Jean Pierre Petit, a French researcher in his 80s now who's been completely dismissed by other scientists in France. I'm fairly sure his documents exist in English, but he's done many videos in French explaining his theory.
I am a gardener so this is probably a stupid idea but I wonder what would happen if we were able to manufacture an object that was exactly the size of the boundary between relativity and quantum physics. Would adding a tiny bit of heat or cooling it flip it from one state to the other?
Are there not supposed to be a vast amount of free-floating black-holes? Cant this account for the missing baryonic matter problem? As you said the matter might simply be too difficult to see.
This has nothing to do with the video I just thought about something. What if the 11 dimensions in string theory exists everywhere but we cant interact with them because we can only interact with 3 dimensions. Could the other dimensions be where what we call dark matter is? Could that also be what makes gravity so weak? I know that this probably sounds stupid to a physicist but I just wanted to write it.
In my mind you have described at best a paradox and at worst an impossible physics fantasy. If antimatter was created in the big bang but is travelling backwards in time where in time can it go beyond the big bang? Also how can it be distributed around the universe to now be travelling backwards in time, did it travel forward in time for a while and then change direction?
i want to be a science fiction writer. not because i think its going to be lucrative but because i think i have some interesting ideas that maybe somebody else would find interesting. thank, you for putting all of these videos out it helps expand upon knowledge and imagination in something i enjoy greatly and i cant tell you how much i appreciate it so ill just buy your books, read them and tell people to go read them. Also i hope you had a good 4th if you were in the states.
My question is, if Thermal energy singularity frequencies rebounding in mass, as outward pressure of force known as weight, contained in magnetic fields of forced cycling patterns, in unidirectional forward maximum momentum velocity is outward force in resistance to cold space, how does it collapse in on itself to form a black hole? All Thermal energy singularity frequencies are outward pressure held in magnetic fields of forced cycling circulation patterns. Conservation of maximum momentum velocity is maintained by loss of distance of vibrating forward momentum traveling, as repulsion to magnetic fields of force holding mass together, in equalization to resistance cycling patterns in reversal of trajectories curving back and through mass as the weakest point of resistance, which is mass. Thermal energy singularity frequencies rebounding in mass is the energy contained. Periodic table of elements proves hypothesis of thermal energy singularity frequencies rebounding in mass as outward pressure of force as weight. The magnetic fields increase in area and force as thermal energy increases in resistance. Occupied space is equalization of resistance in it. Nullifying the resistance as ouward force of weight, contained in magnetic fields cycling, holding mass together. Thermal energy singularity, is in all mass and space, as maximum momentum velocity in resistance to cold space. Perpetual motion. Momentum of forward velocity is maintained equally as force of weight, in resistance to cold space in entanglement of mass, and out of entanglement. Momentum maximum velocity is constant through magnetic fields by transference trajectories of flow in cycling circulation patterns, as Fluidity into illusionary solidity, of mass. Distance traveled is reduced in backward cycling of unidirectional forward momentum, in magnetic fields. Conservation of maximum momentum velocity in mass, as cycling maximum momentum maintained velocity. How does momentum maximum velocity collapse, if energy is conserved? Outward force is stronger in mass in magnetic fields. What force condenses thermal energy singularity frequencies rebounding in mass as a black hole. Resistance is constant in space. Thermal energy singularity frequencies accumulated in mass are in equalization of forces of resistance and thermal energy.
Could the baryons just have traveled beyond the point to where we can no longer see them (outside the visible universe, but still inside the universe)?
Could the anti-matter discrepancy have any relation to the neutrino flavor preference? (Per a paper that I read a synopsis of in 2019 or 2020, neutrinos stay in 2 versions more often than the 3rd. This occurs despite the regular transformation/rotation of neutrinos through the 3 kinds of neutrino.) (My other thought per anti-matter is that there is some kind of preferred random production from pair-production. This would occur as rare paired neutrons or same-charge baryons. (Neutrons chosen as they decay to hydrogen.))
But even if there had been an Annihilation Event, what happened to all the energy it would have produced? And since matter and energy are just different forms of the same 'thing', isn't "Annihilation" the wrong word to use? Because if anti-matter and matter combined and resulted in energy, that energy could theoretically return to its matter form, right?
To somewhat answer the second part of your question: Anti-matter still has a positive mass, as it’s simply an oppositely-charged atomic particle. A positron has the same mass, however small, as an electron. Because of the law of conservation of energy, we know that that mass has to go somewhere. It’s transformed into energy via the annihilation. Theoretically that energy could be changed back into mass, as we know thanks to Einstein’s E=MC^2 which works both ways along with conservation of energy.
Can anyone explain to me why we have decided that there couldn't be lots of distant black holes we can't see or even planets? how are they calculating the average mass and quantity of planets in an average solar system, that's definitely a statistic we don't know and seems like it would make a large impact on the calculations.
Much of the invisible baryon is matter is in the form of ionized hydrogen in intergalactic space. It requires little energy to ionize hydrogen and the expansion of the universe reduces the density and hence the recombination rate.
Just an idea likely stupid but what if Tachyons exist and is actually anti-matter? Since it's kind of a mirror of normal particles traveling only at faster than light speed and potentially going back in time?
My thoughts on the missing baryon problem? Have you tried looking in the laundry basket? When I'm missing something, that's always the first place I look.
Now I'm wondering if it's possible to have an anti-black hole. How would you distinguish it from a regular black hole? If it met a matter black hole would they merge or annihilate?
They would merge. A black hole forms not because it reaches a mass density, it is an energy density. It is conflated because there is a mass-energy equivalence (E=mc2) A kugelblitz is a type of black hole that is formed by pure energy. Even if the black hole still contains anything resembling normal matter, and you add antimatter and it annihilates, it is only going to create energy. That will remain trapped within the black hole, and outside observers will know no different than two masses merging.
I want to hear him just once say “in which we liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiive” but for 30 seconds. So long that even fans of the channel are left scratching their heads.
😄😄
Whenever I hear that closing I just think, "what a nerd!"
Glad someone's doing this, though. 😄😄
Or "In which we liii..." (and the transmission is suddenly terminated with sniffly possum noises)
We wouldn't be scratching our heads, we'd be cheering and you know it.
@@dagoonite I certainly would be 😅
Yessssssss
Excellent video, John! Thanks!!! 😊
Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
Yes! What a perfect way to end my Friday night at work!
"what's the matter, dear?"
"baryonic hydrogen & helium atoms, mostly."
There is no dark side of matter, really, Matter of fact it's all dark.
Always love to see a JMG new video to listen to as my bed time story
The voice. Him, Sea and Butler. Perfect for bedtime. But this one might be best because it has the theta/delta wave binaural beat music in the background.
Another mention of my favorite odd element, Beryllium. While it is produced inside stars, it is also burned off there as well, which leads to it being rare. In fact, most of the beryllium in the universe, wasn't made in the heart of a star, but instead was produced by the cosmic ray induced spallation of heavier elements. So we take this rare metal made by cosmic rays, and use it it all kinds of special nuclear, nuclear medicine, thermal and tooling applications, without really thinking about where it came from.
Oh, I thought beryllium spheres were mined by minors on the rock monster planet. 😊
Is there a measurable amount here on Earth?
@@swetsTV Yes. There are actually decent amounts in the upper soil layers, because quite a bit is created in the upper atmosphere, as cosmic rays slam into oxygen atoms high in the atmosphere and produce many elements, including Beryllium. One created, those elements slowly drift to earth, as a sort of meteoric rain.
Always great to see a new video drop from JMG.
Thanks for yet another great video. Best regards from Copenhagen, Denmark.
I just got your book “The Salvagers”. I’d like to say it was very good and I’m looking forward to more books from you!
I wonder if there might be a circumstance where matter and anti-matter could act like oil and water separated by gravitational or magnetic fields?
Not like oil and water, no, but potentially we could have something similar to the leidenfrost effect (think water droplet on a very hot pan). The annihilation of some matter/antimatter could act as a cushion, just like water being turned into steam on a hot pan acts as a cushion
Its possible gravity could work differently for the two forms of matter and there are even experiments looking to test this though they are in practice complicated by the relative weakness of gravity. However given that magnetic fields were how we first detected antimatter (positrons) we can effectively rule out a magnetic contribution to the matter antimatter discrepancy as the only way to tell a positron is a positron short of it annihilating with an electron is to measure how it deflects within a magnetic field.
@@platosbeard3476 This is a hella interesting idea
@@Dragrath1
Why would experiments be difficult? It is true that gravity is weak, but small amounts of antimatter have been synthesized here on earth. They have to be kept in a vacuum to stop annihilating. Turn off the magneto-optic trap, or whatever it is they use to keep antimatter floating and you can measure the time it takes for the particles to annihilate by hitting into the walls of the vacuum chamber, also locate whether the antimatter impacted the top or bottom walls.
Afaik it's already known that antimatter, while having the opposite spin and charge, still has positive mass and thus interacts with gravity like normal matter
Good comment
Don’t forget the missing Tupperware lids Michael, those are much denser than socks.
Omg rrrrrighhhttt? Wtf
I think they morph into coat hangers.
i learned something just from reading the title! you’re the best JMG. much love from Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
Love your knowledge and programs. 😊
6:55 - Although purely theoretically possible, that scenario is highly improbable. All the galaxies, stars, stuff... we see in the observable Universe is with high probability matter (no anti-matter) because if it weren't so, we would see the very prominent signs of the annihilation process all around the observable Universe.
It has been said that antimatter resembles matter that is traveling backwards in time. Given that, one could guess that the antimatter produced at the Big Bang went "the other direction" in time from that point.
Genuine good point, dude! Prof. Hawking got me thinking of all that Arrow of Time stuff too, and all the symmetries involved in the reversal scenario. Cool stuff 🧠💪
That'd be trippy to think there's a "universe in reverse" out there. Idk if I'm understanding it right, but I just had that thought.
@@urphakeandgey6308 But how can one tell (in relativistic terms) which universe is 'forward' and which is 'backwards'?
If anti matter goes back in time starting at 0 in reverse direction from us, then it would be negative time to us but linear and forward moving to them.
So newton was right again!
Every action.....
Thanks, John..
This stuff was keeping up at night...whew
That was interesting. But I'm more interested in that opossum and what he's doing to the LeBaron .
Hi J.M. ! Two things plague my mind. The first is the Gravity thing: will we ever in our lifetimes see a complete Standard Model that incorporates gravity
successfully into its equations? Thanks to insomnia I literally stay awake pondering this. The other thought that totally ruins my brain is the subject of human memorecall; how it works ( something something Hippocampus!) , how such memories are stored, accessed, filed, etc.
Still a side- subject about which, despite such marvels as the Human Genome map, we still know very little about this.
Keep up the Excellent stuff, sir! 💎
We are preprogrammed to do a lot of things, these will eventually be figured out in the HGP I believe.
One of the things we are wired to do is recognize the smell and voice of our primary caregivers at birth, and when our optic nerve finishes growing we quickly learn to recognize them.
Our brains are pre-wired to pick up the frequencies of different sounds in parallel which allows us to do a sort of Fournier Analysis and recognize frequently repeated sounds because the brain cell grows stronger with use. From there certain combinations of sounds can be identified as things you can see around you, important things like mama and dada, bottle, juice. Everything builds off of previous memorized thoughts. If you pay attention to any of the current AI stuff they basically teach by pattern recognition so they show the AI 50,000 pictures of tables and then it can recognize a table even one it's never seen before. But to us a table is much more than an image, it's a place in our home, it has a function, we sit at it and eat or do homework, we set the table and clear the table, it has a wide flat surface and chairs around it so now when we go into someone else's house we recognize their table because it is also a wide flat surface, with chairs we can sit at the table and eat and it is in the kitchen or a dedicated room right off the kitchen.
When we want to learn something totally new for example reading we have to train our brain to recognize this visual input to this sound. We have to do this many times while the brain cells grow the right connections between the visual and auditory sections of your brain and strengthen them, but again it's all in relation to things we already know. You don't teach a child 'hippocampus' as a complete word, you teach each letters then small single syllable words then combine syllables to make more complex words.
So a table is not a single brain cell, it's a place, it's certain functions, it's a shape, it's a sound, it's specific letters.
It's all about those preprogrammed responses and for creatures such as us who have parents we automatically mimic our parents to learn.
Lions do not typically attack people because they learn what is food from their mother and we are not it. But if one becomes hungry enough to try it and discovers we are pretty tasty it will continue to eat us and teach it's young, so great effort is put into hunting down any lion that eats a person.
So the big problems as we saw it in AI is that preprogrammed weights or strength of certain neural connections that we couldn't know and the roll-model/mimic problem, that we had no adults to teach the child.
Bear in mind that Gravity doesn't really exist; it's an effect of mass on Spacetime, & not a thing in itself...sort of like ice - you can't have it without water but you won't get it without low temp, so it's derivative...
Yep, those donut disappearances are troubling for sure.
Always a good time when you upload! Keep it up!
We all know the antimatter universe isn't time-reversed but goatee-reversed.
Sunday night JMG video as I'm relaxing for work in the morning! 🐼✌
Sunday? You're behind the times mate :-)
Yeah I usually am not able to watch the videos as they're released, because of work 😕
Feels like we're on the edge of figuring something really important out ;-)
Another great one john 👍 The Dark Voids of Intergalactic Space is scary
If the big bang is expanding both into the future and the past, then there goes the apparent paradox of what happened before the big bang.
Still don't know if it had a cause. Or source rather.
So that's the *when* dealt with, all that's left is the *where.*
John, I hate to tell you, but missing socks are the sole doing of the sock goblin, and for some reason or another he replaces them with extra Tupperware lids.
Yes, but the sock goblin has to be storing his loot somewhere. Likewise, there must be some method of Tupperware lid generation that we cannot currently fathom.
Is there a reason the missing matter couldn't just be outside of the 93 billion lightyear sphere that is our universe? Early inflation seems like it would make that probable and we will just never be able to see it.
We have no idea
Scientists could probably come up with all kinds of reasons, number one reason being we just dont know what's beyond that point because that's all the further we're able to see, making it so we arent even certain if the edge of the universe is actually the edge of the universe. It's entirely possible there's even more stars and galaxies lighting up the space we cant see.
It's possible, but *why* would it be only there and not here? Like 100% not in our detection range
First thing you have to do is come up with some models for why our neck of the woods is unique or at least noticeably different than all or some others. It's better to assume we not special to assume we are.
I need to watch this 5 more times, fantastic video!
I finally meet my dream girl only to find out she’s made of antimatter. What an explosive relationship that would be.
I did check out your book, its pretty dang good. Enjoying it now.
Some stupid article said that space is actually beige. No I don't know how they got there. But now I wonder if our universe isn't just a light bulb where baryonic matter is the exhaust matter of our universe consuming itself.
I really enjoy these, keep em coming.
hi! thank you for the video. hope you have a nice day
"Blame the Possum" deserves being on T-shirts all over the South
So if the anti-universe goes backwards in time, does that mean, that it started out big and is shrinking?
If the Andromeda galaxy is an antimatter galaxy, things are going to get really interesting.
Humans will be long extinct by then.
Briefly.
I really want to watch it, but have to hold as its better to watch while sleeping when nothing else is on ur mind. Man 2-3 uploads a week by jmg doesn't seem enough content because it's such good quality.
For the missing baryonic matter, how do the estimates for total baryonic matter present today account for the likelihood that some (unknown) portion of the total universe is beyond our event horizon?
It could be possible that the antimatter universe calls their matter, matter. And they think our part as antimatter
There are really smart people in that universe wondering about the missing 5% of matter and trying to understand the discrepancies in their gravitational calculations.
Woah!
@@burningchrome70
They used to have it, but they lost it, because time is going backwards.
It IS all matter, the only difference is the electrical charge.
We call it antimatter because we have a preference bias since we are made of the baryonic matter that is the predominant kind matter throughout this universe.
@@burningchrome70 I think you're confusing antimatter with dark matter and dark energy. 95% of the universe is dark matter and dark energy, not antimatter.
antimatter galaxy's could be separated by VAST distances, you think the visible universe is a long way, compared to the antimatter galaxy's, it's just down the road.
our entire visible universe could lie in a matter rich area, hmm, there could be areas the size of our visible universe that are far more rich in matter, the sky's lit up, packed with galaxies.
problem is without FTL i don't think it would be provable, our visible universe is a very small sample size of the universe.
I have had similar thoughts.
. . . And it is getting LARGER by the day. Professor Saul Perlmutter must have freaked when the number-crunching agreed. One of the cooler Nobels given out. 👍
It is just weird that this is the case. Evidence that the universe isn't really made for us
If the cosmic background radiation map is anything to go by, at the very least matter is fairly evenly spread out throughout the entire universe. Though that still leaves the possibility that the antimatter part is just way outside of the observable part.
@@Sanquinity doesn’t that just mean it *was* pretty even?
For some reason people don't know that Einstein repeatedly said that singularities are not possible. Wherever you have an astronomical quantity of mass "dilation" (sometimes called gamma or y) will occur. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer.
In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" Einstein wrote "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the "Schwarzchild singularities" (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The"Schwarzchild singularities" do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light."
If you look at a common relativity graph with velocity on the horizontal line and dilation on the vertical, the phenomenon is clear, even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated.
There is no place in the universe where mass is more concentrated than at the center of a galaxy. 99.8% of the mass in our solar system is in the sun. 99.9% of the mass in an atom is in the nucleus. If these norms are true for galaxies than we can infer that there is 100's of trillions of solar masses at the center of common spiral galaxies. There is no way to know through observation, there is far too much interference, dilation and gravitational lensing. High mass means high momentum. If we attribute a radius to these numbers than we can calculate that relativistic velocities exist in these regions.
The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. In some sublime way that mass is all around us because as the graph shows we are still connected to it.
The greatest mystery in science is the abnormally high rotation rates of stars in spiral galaxies (the reason for the theory of dark matter). It was recently discovered that low mass galaxies (like NGC 1052-DF2) have normal star rotation rates. This is what relativity would predict because there is an insufficient quantity of mass to achieve relativistic velocities. This is virtual proof that dilation is the governing phenomenon at galactic centers. There can be no other realistic explanation for this fact.
Einstein formulated relativity before the existence of galaxies was confirmed. It's clear the mass is dilated though the galaxy and not the universe as a whole.
Black holes were popularized by television in the 1960's and belief in them gradually came to be despite the fact that Einstein said they cannot exist and there was no evidence.
The notion that there is a way to take a picture of the galactic center is absurd. As per relativity an observer would have to exist at or near it's momentum.
If you pose the question "why can't we see light from the galactic center?" The modern answer would be because gravitational forces there are so strong that not even light can escape (even though the mass of the photon is 0) Einstein's answer would be because the mass there is dilated relative to an Earth bound observer.
Einstein's answer explains the greatest mystery in science. All images and data from galactic centers is in line with relativity.
I'm now convinced I'm an anti-normal human that has accidentally slipped into this version of the universe.
Are you implying you’ve never experienced human contact? 😂
Douglas Adams speculated packing peanuts were the missing matter of the universe. I tend to believe him.
"Two galaxies of different flavours" I dunno why, but I liked that
I’ve just realised I love these talks and I love surreal art is there a connection
Brilliant videoJMG!!!
Please put you books on Audible! We love your content and voice!!!
1:17 - "like the subatomic world where relativity breaks down...." - NO! Relativity DOES NOT break down in the subatomic world!!!!
Yes it does or Einstein would have nailed a quantum theory of gravity. He did not.
Nice Video bro
Mind blown. More please!
The Xeelee Sequence setting had a great take on this.
I would LOVE to hear a video featuring you're take on the USS Nimitz and the videos released by the Pentagon.
A question I have is about time. Is an hour after the Big Bang the same as an hour today.
Yes it’s technically the same length but we know time can speed or slow down.
Then if you know time varies, then is the time to the beginning is it really 13.8bn based on our current time or is it older.
For that list of missing matter, you can add 10mm sockets. That should make up a significant portion. 😛
You can imagine a long-distance conversation between a matter galaxy and an anti-matter galaxy:
"You're the anti-matter."
"No, _you're_ the anti-matter."
"No, I tell you _you're_ the anti-matter. No returns, so there!"
Two small thoughts:
1-- Look into the research concerning potential "symmetrons". These are hypothetical particles that could explain why most galaxies end up shaped in discs and not in other, more spherical forms. IF there is a mirrored "anti-universe" racing away from us in time from the Big Bang, symmetrons might explain the expansion of the universe, then, if the Big Bang was somehow forced into the rough shape of a hyperboloid, with the universe separating itself out into two roughly equal saddle-shaped projections of space where the farther you go, the farther you CAN go.
2-- Or, the flaw in baryonic matter and anti-matter could simply be down to mathematics itself. There are some things that negative numbers can't do, quite literally due to how multiplication and division work. It could be that matter and anti-matter work much the same way, that the math of anti-matter is messed up enough that it shows in the atomic droplet modeling of atomic nuclei. Meaning more anti-matter elements of the Periodic Table become unstable and radioactive, and/or simply disintegrate at far different rates than normal baryonic matter.
Oh, I can explain the cookies and donuts... LOL. Thanks JMG!!
I'm glad that you returned to actual science.
I've never left actual science. Ever. What I do occasionally leave behind is bias. As science also does.
@@JohnMichaelGodier When anyone claims unexplainable events COULD be aliens, they might as well claim it could be angels or could be Zorgs from the 5th dimension. It's pure science fiction, and one step off tinfoil hat territory. The entire concept of alien life is made up, we have zero evidence. Now I'm more than willing to agree that life might exist elsewhere just based on the numbers, but that's life, not intelligent life capable of breaking physics and traveling the stars and having any interest in our primitive planet and species. If you can't see that then you are biased.
No, it's advancing a hypothesis that an unexplained phenomenon could be due to aliens, which is perfectly reasonable since we are someone else's aliens. We self prove that intelligent life is possible in the universe. What we've done is put a taboo on the word alien, let the UFO people have the word, and put ourselves into a position where we could walk along a beach and spot a discarded Pepsi bottle, and then do everything we possibly can to convince ourselves it's a weird clam because we don't want to be associated with the word "artificial". This sad state of affairs puts science into a realm worse than religion or woo, it puts it into the territory of lying to one's self and others ... just because of the baggage of a word.
And here is bias. You used the distance argument. The problem with that argument is two-fold. One we do not have a complete understanding of physics. We only know a couple disparate sections of it, which we interpret as prohibitions. But the bias here is that we think of crossing spacetime from the perspective of an organism that lives about 80 years. If you live 10,000 years, that changes. If you're a machine that doesn't care about time, you can fill the galaxy with copies of yourself within a few million years at sub light speeds. This is what predicates the Fermi paradox, since on long times scales space travel is so EASY, then aliens should be evident everywhere. So Fermi asked, where are they? And it's true, we should expect to see evidence of aliens commonly and it should be no surprise if and when we do. Yet, somehow, we've made it a surprise for arbitrary taboo reasons.
Likewise the distance argument wholesale ignores the reality of General Relativity somehow. It just tosses it into the trashcan willy nilly. That weirdness aside, get up to relativistic speeds and you can cross most of the observable universe within a human lifetime, if you're willing to travel into the far future in the process within your frame of reference. As humans, we don't like that because we can't travel back in time, but that's an anthropocentric bias. Who said an alien cares about what time it exists in? The answer is no one because no one knows.
And that's why I've been making more alien content, though I always have. The first video on this channel was about Tabby's Star, people seem to forget that. But regardless, we need to bust down the taboo and get it the hell out of science and openly discuss the very real possibility of alien life like adults or we most definitely will miss it by calling the Pepsi bottle a weird clam. In fact, in three specific cases that I know if, we may have done that already. More often than not, whenever the word alien goes on the table as an explanation for something, the study of that object stops for fear of career damage for breaking science's holy taboo. I will not condone or enable it.
@@JohnMichaelGodier You have completely convinced yourself that this is true. I'm sorry but this has dissolved into mental illness, that or you have thoroughly lied to yourself about your motivations. Let's not pretend that there is nothing to be gained from coddling up to the "Roswell" crowd. And I saw your Tabby's Star videeo, and most videos since. You never once insinuated that it was aliens, only explored the possibility. And even if you had, there is still a big difference between alien life in their own system, and alien life here. Is there a chance? Yes, but even if the odds are high, that's still about a 1 in 4 quadrillion chance(yes I pulled that number out of my ass). Ask any mathematician about those odds and they will laugh directly in your face. All of this leaves 3 possibilities. 1. You're wrong but think you're right. 2. You know you're wrong and are intentionally being dishonest.(Either with yourself, or your audience) 3. You're right, and I'm wrong. (And so is everything we know about the universe.)
You don't have to be a mathematician to understand those odds.
If we can only see part of the Universe and we have no idea how much of it we CAN’T see, how can we conjecture that any matter is missing? Is it not possible that the “missing” matter is simply “out there” in the part of the Universe we cannot see? (I love this channel)
I think that time is a physical dimension like a superfluid and we're moving through it at close to the speed of the superfluid itself, but anything with mass creates drag or resistance through the superfluid which slows it's passage through time for the object, and therefore for the object of mass time is moving at a slower rate. A singularity is so massive that it can no longer move through time at all, the flow of time stops at the singularity and only moving faster than the superfluid will allow you to get away from it, which is impossible. It means that the singularity of a black hole is indeed a wormhole connecting the past and the future in one single location, from the day the singularity first formed to the day it evaporates where time stops, but it's not traversable as the superfluid flow of time has also come to a halt.
Anything without mass like a photon has no drag through the superfluid of time, so it can move through space and experience no time at all, ie C, and from the perspective of the photon time doesn't exist.
Being in orbit of a massive object is to be dragged through time with the massive object, hence the reduced flow of time of the massive object also dragging the orbing object into the slower flow of time the closer the smaller object gets to it.
Humans standing on a planet like Earth means we're objects of mass moving through time slightly slower than we would be if we were an object further away from the planet and away from the planet's drag through time superfluid of time.
If you wanted to go back in time you would need to be an object with negative mass able to move through the superfluid of time faster than time is moving in the direction of the future.
Therefore, the Higgs boson resists the superfluidic flow of time, like an electron slows down as a super conductor is warmed up.
So perhaps we really could put time in a bottle? Only joking of course- that’s an interesting concept! It harkens back to old theories of ether and such, while still maintaining consistency with scientific proofs we have in the modern day.
On the topic of anti universe, you should investigate the "Janus model", which is an expansion of the Einstein's field equations and adds anti-universe. It's been proposed by Jean Pierre Petit, a French researcher in his 80s now who's been completely dismissed by other scientists in France.
I'm fairly sure his documents exist in English, but he's done many videos in French explaining his theory.
JPP is a hack that doesn't believe in black holes, there are very good reason for credible scientists dismissing his "theories".
I am a gardener so this is probably a stupid idea but I wonder what would happen if we were able to manufacture an object that was exactly the size of the boundary between relativity and quantum physics. Would adding a tiny bit of heat or cooling it flip it from one state to the other?
Intelligence, insight, curiosity, and humor. JMG for pres
So there I was, landing my spaceship on a remote planet, and it turns out it was made of antimatter...
Deep enigmatic information. But I don't believe our annihilation will be from antimatter but from our own intolerance to each other.
Are there not supposed to be a vast amount of free-floating black-holes? Cant this account for the missing baryonic matter problem? As you said the matter might simply be too difficult to see.
This has nothing to do with the video I just thought about something. What if the 11 dimensions in string theory exists everywhere but we cant interact with them because we can only interact with 3 dimensions. Could the other dimensions be where what we call dark matter is? Could that also be what makes gravity so weak? I know that this probably sounds stupid to a physicist but I just wanted to write it.
In my mind you have described at best a paradox and at worst an impossible physics fantasy. If antimatter was created in the big bang but is travelling backwards in time where in time can it go beyond the big bang? Also how can it be distributed around the universe to now be travelling backwards in time, did it travel forward in time for a while and then change direction?
i want to be a science fiction writer. not because i think its going to be lucrative but because i think i have some interesting ideas that maybe somebody else would find interesting. thank, you for putting all of these videos out it helps expand upon knowledge and imagination in something i enjoy greatly and i cant tell you how much i appreciate it so ill just buy your books, read them and tell people to go read them. Also i hope you had a good 4th if you were in the states.
More great content. Thanks
Even if an antimatter universe did exist, we could never see it, or we will immediately annihilate.
I thought photons were their own anti-particle.....
So... not exactly?
My question is, if Thermal energy singularity frequencies rebounding in mass, as outward pressure of force known as weight, contained in magnetic fields of forced cycling patterns, in unidirectional forward maximum momentum velocity is outward force in resistance to cold space, how does it collapse in on itself to form a black hole? All Thermal energy singularity frequencies are outward pressure held in magnetic fields of forced cycling circulation patterns. Conservation of maximum momentum velocity is maintained by loss of distance of vibrating forward momentum traveling, as repulsion to magnetic fields of force holding mass together, in equalization to resistance cycling patterns in reversal of trajectories curving back and through mass as the weakest point of resistance, which is mass. Thermal energy singularity frequencies rebounding in mass is the energy contained. Periodic table of elements proves hypothesis of thermal energy singularity frequencies rebounding in mass as outward pressure of force as weight. The magnetic fields increase in area and force as thermal energy increases in resistance. Occupied space is equalization of resistance in it. Nullifying the resistance as ouward force of weight, contained in magnetic fields cycling, holding mass together. Thermal energy singularity, is in all mass and space, as maximum momentum velocity in resistance to cold space. Perpetual motion. Momentum of forward velocity is maintained equally as force of weight, in resistance to cold space in entanglement of mass, and out of entanglement. Momentum maximum velocity is constant through magnetic fields by transference trajectories of flow in cycling circulation patterns, as Fluidity into illusionary solidity, of mass. Distance traveled is reduced in backward cycling of unidirectional forward momentum, in magnetic fields. Conservation of maximum momentum velocity in mass, as cycling maximum momentum maintained velocity. How does momentum maximum velocity collapse, if energy is conserved? Outward force is stronger in mass in magnetic fields. What force condenses thermal energy singularity frequencies rebounding in mass as a black hole. Resistance is constant in space. Thermal energy singularity frequencies accumulated in mass are in equalization of forces of resistance and thermal energy.
My father must be baryonic matter..
Aww! 😟
Could the baryons just have traveled beyond the point to where we can no longer see them (outside the visible universe, but still inside the universe)?
Could the anti-matter discrepancy have any relation to the neutrino flavor preference? (Per a paper that I read a synopsis of in 2019 or 2020, neutrinos stay in 2 versions more often than the 3rd. This occurs despite the regular transformation/rotation of neutrinos through the 3 kinds of neutrino.)
(My other thought per anti-matter is that there is some kind of preferred random production from pair-production. This would occur as rare paired neutrons or same-charge baryons. (Neutrons chosen as they decay to hydrogen.))
But even if there had been an Annihilation Event, what happened to all the energy it would have produced?
And since matter and energy are just different forms of the same 'thing', isn't "Annihilation" the wrong word to use? Because if anti-matter and matter combined and resulted in energy, that energy could theoretically return to its matter form, right?
To somewhat answer the second part of your question: Anti-matter still has a positive mass, as it’s simply an oppositely-charged atomic particle. A positron has the same mass, however small, as an electron. Because of the law of conservation of energy, we know that that mass has to go somewhere. It’s transformed into energy via the annihilation. Theoretically that energy could be changed back into mass, as we know thanks to Einstein’s E=MC^2 which works both ways along with conservation of energy.
Hmmmm … missing matter .. I’d add missing keys to that list.
Nothing is more awesome than an awesome opossum!
How do you titalate an ocelot? You ocilate it's tit a lot!
It is a fact that socks get lost in the dryer, travel through a portal where they get turned into extra tupperware lids...
Excellent!
Try getting Sabine Hossenfelder on Event Horizon.
How does the current understanding of physics explain the extra matter versus the amount of antimatter?
Can anyone explain to me why we have decided that there couldn't be lots of distant black holes we can't see or even planets? how are they calculating the average mass and quantity of planets in an average solar system, that's definitely a statistic we don't know and seems like it would make a large impact on the calculations.
You have to remember these people wrap their heads around this endlessly
They even account for neutrinos
@@azmanabdula yes I understand that, I'm not sure what makes you think I don't.
I know someone who had that baryonic surgery - lost like 150lbs. So where did that all that matter go?
I thought what we don't see is 10 to the 62nd power. Could the anti-matter be out there somewhere beyond what we see?
Much of the invisible baryon is matter is in the form of ionized hydrogen in intergalactic space. It requires little energy to ionize hydrogen and the expansion of the universe reduces the density and hence the recombination rate.
Have a wonderful 4th of July
Why isn’t your book on audible?
What an amazing universe, I have a few extra anti brownies bars in my freezer.
Just an idea likely stupid but what if Tachyons exist and is actually anti-matter? Since it's kind of a mirror of normal particles traveling only at faster than light speed and potentially going back in time?
My thoughts on the missing baryon problem?
Have you tried looking in the laundry basket? When I'm missing something, that's always the first place I look.
Theoretically, and with some fancy physics, computers can make analogues of a specific time for a chosen region using z red shift.
As always, terrific stuff, JMG!🌌☄🔭🛰👾🙏
I'm going to go to sleep tonight thinking about an anti-me thinking about me. The mind reels.
Imagine normal and anti matter aliens traveling in the intergalactic medium about to make contact with each other not knowing it'll be their last
_"Yo, hi five!"_
😥
@@massimookissed1023 *BOOM* 💥high-five Gamma ray release event... hypothesize that out scientists 🤣
Now I'm wondering if it's possible to have an anti-black hole. How would you distinguish it from a regular black hole? If it met a matter black hole would they merge or annihilate?
That would be amazing to witness, and probably super dangerous if you were too close to the merger.
They would merge.
A black hole forms not because it reaches a mass density, it is an energy density.
It is conflated because there is a mass-energy equivalence (E=mc2)
A kugelblitz is a type of black hole that is formed by pure energy.
Even if the black hole still contains anything resembling normal matter, and you add antimatter and it annihilates, it is only going to create energy.
That will remain trapped within the black hole, and outside observers will know no different than two masses merging.
Could there be many more micro black holes than we think?
God is watching this video and is like, "this Godier guy is so close to the way they're gonna catch me!"
What about all the matter that has disappeared over the cosmic horizon?
Womder if since there is anti-matter if there is a anti-space as well?🤔