D Alembert formula

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 сен 2024
  • D'Alembert's formula for the wave equation
    In this video, I derive D'Alembert's formula for the solution of the wave equation u_tt = c^2 u_xx, which is a very elegant way of describing the motion of a wave
    Check out my PDE Playlist: • Partial Differential E...
    Subscribe to my channel: / drpeyam

Комментарии • 25

  • @ProfessorWumbo
    @ProfessorWumbo Год назад

    This is BEAUTIFULLY explained and puts my textbook to shame. Thank you for making this video. I learned so so much.

  • @estebanmartinez4803
    @estebanmartinez4803 4 года назад +3

    Wow, just took a PDE exam yesterday and I had to derive it in a question!

  • @manfredwitzany2233
    @manfredwitzany2233 4 года назад +4

    Thank you for showing to exactly calculate this formula.

  • @green0563
    @green0563 4 года назад +3

    This is good stuff. Thanks for introducing me to such wonderful pieces of Math, Dr. Peyam! I love your teaching style.

  • @rajithperera9040
    @rajithperera9040 3 года назад +1

    Perfect Explanation. You are the best Dr Peyam. Cheers!

  • @emman100
    @emman100 4 года назад +4

    I wish I had known this before taking PDE's. It looked like another language back then. Quite elegant though.

  • @WerIstWieJesus
    @WerIstWieJesus 4 года назад

    In your videos everything becomes easy, evident and elegant! I wouldn't have had any clue to solve that!

  • @dgrandlapinblanc
    @dgrandlapinblanc 4 года назад

    Come back. Thank you very much.

  • @robsbackyardastrophotograp8885
    @robsbackyardastrophotograp8885 4 года назад

    Very beautiful! More PDE please!

  • @wojciechniespodziany4138
    @wojciechniespodziany4138 4 года назад

    Great, awesome and clearly presented

  • @WerIstWieJesus
    @WerIstWieJesus 4 года назад +2

    I ask myself what is in the 3-dimensional case? phi(x-ct)+phi(x+ct) will become probably the surface of a ball. And the integral will go over the volume of the ball.

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 года назад +2

      Yeah, it basically becomes a surface integral, it’s quite interesting!

  • @ayyanali8477
    @ayyanali8477 3 года назад

    How it comes? what about its history?
    Plz tell me
    Characteristics of d alembert solution.

  • @jueraljy9263
    @jueraljy9263 4 года назад

    Could you kindly elaborate on the integration part at 4:18, what is the rationale behind this? thnks

  • @rodrigolopez3874
    @rodrigolopez3874 4 года назад

    Why do you integrate respect s if you derivated respect t?

  • @aamirishaq3360
    @aamirishaq3360 4 года назад

    Sir plz do the same question with mixed boundary conditions

  • @sadface7457
    @sadface7457 4 года назад

    How do people solve non-linear matrix equations.

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 года назад

      A^2 = A ruclips.net/video/Ml2Say99FqI/видео.html

    • @sadface7457
      @sadface7457 4 года назад

      @@drpeyam You use newtons method using the jaccobian matrix.

  • @ozzymandius666
    @ozzymandius666 4 года назад +1

    Interesting, but not Lorentz invariant. Us physics people can be a real pain, I know.

  • @MarceloGondaStangler
    @MarceloGondaStangler 4 года назад

    Good job, but maybe legends can be realy usseful, bacause a lot of subs dont speak english, including me

  • @sayanmaji2845
    @sayanmaji2845 4 года назад +3

    1st comment.... Nice