We Are Seeing a Visceral Hatred for All the Achievements of Western Civilisation: Frank Furedi
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 май 2024
- NTD’s Lee Hall sits down with author, commentator and sociologist Professor Frank Furedi to talk about the attempted cancellation of NatCon Brussels, the decivilisation of Western society, and the ideological remoulding of our young people.
The rot has been spreading like a cancerous growth for decades but with little to no action to counter and annihilate the problem.
Uk was England, now Germany has own it out-right. Brit Airlines, German Owned , Tui, German owned and both cloud seeding uk so expect grey cloud cover 365 days a year. All entirly true.Lidl, Aldi, Merc, Mini, Bmw, Audi all local money heading out the country back to Gold Paved Parks in Munich. No local money is re-circulationg on in towns and villages as the paracites are draining UK.
well we deny the root of the problem and pretend that the people perpetrating this ideology are the biggest victims of the last century
2024 .Smart people must stay silent so as not to offend the stupid!
My friend - Smart people must NOT stay silent so as to offend and challenge the stupid!
Thank you for bringing him on the podcast. Thoroughly enjoyed lustening to his calm rationalisation of a very dire situation across the West.
Frank has the gift of articulating complexity in simple language .I think his summation:of taking the initiative, is spot on and can already be seen in the rise of emerging and relatively established young thinkers.
Thank you for this interview.
Interesting view in his interview. We can see what is happening in Europe, but we are made feel helpless, until we stand up and speak.
It's hard to be optimistic about the present state of the Western world. Especially when there are brutal barbarians, not only at the gates but inside our houses. In large and ever increasing numbers and very adept at manipulating our flaws and weaknesses
I'm very pessimistic about the future of Western Europe.
Islam is definitely a great danger as we will soon realize.
I hope by then it's not too late.
On the plus side, many more people are now aware of the very real threat islam poses to democracy.
The downside is no-one in power is willing or able to offer a tenable resolution .
Remove the TV problem solved..
@@blueeyes402 That will stop the boats
Islam is the SELF-DECLARED enemy.
It was most likely a misplaced cultural arrogance of the elites which made them ignore this fact when enabling huge numbers of Muslims into Europe.
Any further facilitating of Islam in Europe is treason.
Treason is the most serious crime in law since the very existence of laws is undermined by that crime.
De facto, in times of crisis, the death penalty is the norm for treason
Why do you think Islam is the danger? Rather Islam may be the cure of West’s disease.
Where have the good men gone.....the are not in Parliament!
Frank is great to hear speak. Few more like him but 40 years younger and get them in political office.
This was a most interesting interview. Thank you.
Its all by design and the golden rule which is divide and rule.
Karl Popper - The Open Society and its Enemies. 😉
The enemy is walking among us.
Hes stating the bleeding obvious 🤦♂️
What we need is calling out the real deep root of all this cultural Marxism
Then just maybe we can get some sort of resemblance of what we know
***WE MUST RADICALLY RECLAIM OUR INNOCENCE!***
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority,
but to avoid finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.
I'm a socialist, and I find the behaviour of those Belgian mayors to be appalling. I'm sure that most of what is discussed at NatCon would disagreable nonsense, but I defend their right to say it.
I listened carefully to his talk and noted that his argument and worldview rests firmly on liberal principles. He is promoting what is essentially a materialist liberal "universal man, universal values" worldview. He believes in universal values because he believes that Western tradition should be recognized universally, which is liberalism.
The opposite would be a traditional, ancient worldview (for instance one based on ancestor veneration, hierarchy and localism "local man, local values and tradition".) The opposite of liberalism, tradition, would not expect Western values to be universal, would not expect non-Westerners to respect Western values and visa versa. I'm pointing this out because the distinction is often missed in the West which tends to swim at the very deep end of modernity.
The irony is that everything he is calling out that he opposes or has a concern about is merely a natural consequence of liberalism. Liberalism (materialist, universal humanist, progressive history worldview) is the favored worldview of a merchant class. Its just ironic when you hear people arguing against liberalism from within liberalism and arguing for more liberalism.
Liberalism was the invention of the merchant class, at least when it ceased to be a pure abstraction and became e.g. 'Manchester Liberalism'.
Vincent De Paul on his death bed."people will never forgive you for giving them charity.
Yes, exactly.
This lunacy WILL end… there will be a massive swing back and punishment will be meted out and Beauty will return.
It starts with a return to Christianity, something very hard to do in a post-Nietzsche world. Simply because, although we rave about free speech, liberal values, individual liberty etc, the fundamental foundation of Western society is its religious/moral base - it's not called the Judeo-Christian value system for nothing - sorry, that should include the humanistic Greeks as well. And because this is no longer the fabric of our society, we see the breakdown of the family, and everything else spreads from there. It is thus quite telling when Ayan Hirsi notes she has become Christian because she feels a need for that base. Dawkins, although a professed atheist, is simply part of the intellectual elite of the West that can afford to live on its scientific/intellectualism - he does, however, concede the need to be "culturally Christian" simply because it is this value system that allows individuals such as Dawkins, Hitchens et al to thrive.
"Judeo-Christian" was not a popular term until after World War II. There was nothing really Jewish about the West until after the war. Christians and Jews have VERY different views of the world in general.
Platitudes matey. Listen, we are on a runaway train approaching the end of the line, any amount of debating by our great leaders on the comfort of First Class seating and how to improve the conditions of those on the cattle wagons, aint going to stop the train.
Open your eyes!
I like what you're saying, PEEL THE ONION FURTHER
If you go back to the Yalta Conference in 1945 where the future of Europe was
decided by the US UK USSR. French reaction to that snub has led to the invasion
of Europe and since '45 all West Euro States signed up for unification of Eur and the mid east
calling it Eurabia. So while that plays out everything else is geared up to seize.
He who controls education controls the future
We have let the barbarians in through the front door.
The Black Gate of Mordor is open and the Orcs are pouring out.
Only the recent achievements at the expense of other people.
Learn to read between tbe lines.
Wealth without a conscience, paranoid and vicious.
Fractional Reserve Banking, comments?
there is plenty of censorship on Utube, so I don't comment, not worth losing my channel, even though I do Not create contents or upload anything whatsoever
who does the hating ?
Fatuous discussion. Culture is downstream of religion. There is no post-Christian West.
There is Christianity in the West. It comes in several forms and (re-)alignments!
Strange. Because there was a pre-Christian West -- the Greco-Roman world.
Philosophy is upstream to culture and religion. (Platonic philosophy opened the door to the various Oriental cults including Christianity.)
So... meet in "virtual" settings.... no one can shut up.
"Stupid" on many opinions and many levels.
some validity, much over simplification...
Sorry, but supporting the Palestinians in Gaza after we failed them by taking their land to help create the state of Israel doesn’t mean that I hate my country. My late Grandfather fought in WW2 against Nazi tyranny and he also supported the Palestinian cause, because he said it wasn’t our land to give. Trying to right the wrongs that western countries l/governments have done doesn’t mean that you hate your country, it just means that you believe in standing for what is fair and just. If you want to play the game of divide and conquer over issues like this then fine, but I’m of an age where I can’t be bothered over arguing over issues like this.
Go away with your idiotic and provably false lies. Stop supporting Hamas.
Their grandparents didn't fight against nazis, on the contrary as detailed by: Chuck Morse in :
"The Nazi Connection to Islamic Terrorism: Adolf Hitler and Haj Amin Al-Husseini"
Your Grandfather was wrong. To the victor the spoils. Are you saying that the land should be handed back to the Turks? Really? When the ghastly Ottoman slaving empire collapsed the victors acquired the sh1tshow they left behind. The Mandate for Palestine included all of Jordan. But the British had made promises to the Arabs so they handed 3/4 of the landed mandated to be Jewish to the separatist apartheid Muslims. The Muslims wanted ALL of the land and to continue to impose their backward and oppressive doctrines which would make Jews and Christians who had inhabited the land long before Islam existed second class citizens who had already forfeited their lives for not submitting to the god of the Quran.
Giving it back to Turkey would save Western Europe.
Nicxscore74, it wasn't "their land"... read real history books. Palestine is the name the Romans gave to Judea to spite the Jews. It was never an Arab country. Try, if you can and read the "Palestinian Delusion" by Robert Spencer. You are just regurgitating propaganda.
Little Johnny could have come up with a better cover story than this
It’s not rocket science
Look back in time. A long way back
Sir, could you please tell me what you mean?