JEE Advanced Mathematics problems seem to be tricky but are really not

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 окт 2024

Комментарии • 20

  • @ultrasteamcarpetcleaning3207
    @ultrasteamcarpetcleaning3207 2 месяца назад +2

    Absolutely beautiful Dr. PK!!!

    • @Min-cv7nt
      @Min-cv7nt 2 месяца назад

      Totally agree with ya

    • @pkqualitymath1234
      @pkqualitymath1234  2 месяца назад

      Thanks a lot my friend for your support haha👍👍👍

  • @k.somers459
    @k.somers459 2 месяца назад +3

    You did it again. Great video

    • @pkqualitymath1234
      @pkqualitymath1234  2 месяца назад

      Thanks a lot my friend for your support haha👍👍👍

  • @domedebali632
    @domedebali632 2 месяца назад +1

    Another great video professor

  • @MrGLA-zs8xt
    @MrGLA-zs8xt 2 месяца назад +1

    Very nice solution professor

  • @iqtrainer
    @iqtrainer 2 месяца назад +1

    Again, so great video🎉

    • @pkqualitymath1234
      @pkqualitymath1234  2 месяца назад

      Thanks a lot my friend for your support👍👍👍

  • @Min-cv7nt
    @Min-cv7nt 2 месяца назад +1

    Love JEE advanced maths

  • @jagadeesann9527
    @jagadeesann9527 2 месяца назад +1

    Thank you sir

    • @pkqualitymath1234
      @pkqualitymath1234  2 месяца назад

      Thanks a lot my friend for your support👍👍👍

  • @ChiragBharadwajYT
    @ChiragBharadwajYT 2 месяца назад +2

    Hi Dr. PK, I think if you set k equal to the entire expression inside the logarithm (in this case 1/3sqrt(2) * sqrt(4 - k)), you end up with the much nicer quadratic of 18k^2 = 4 - k, which simplifies into (2k+1)(9k-4) = 0, leading very quickly to k = 4/9 without as much radical manipulation.

    • @MrGLA-zs8xt
      @MrGLA-zs8xt 2 месяца назад +1

      That seems like setting k for two times which eventually the same result, could you show your work more?

    • @ChiragBharadwajYT
      @ChiragBharadwajYT 2 месяца назад

      @@MrGLA-zs8xt Nah meant more that the choice of k can include the constant term out front which simplifies the expression. But sure, if you let k = 1/3s(2) * s(4 - 1/3s(2) * ...) then you can square both sides to get k^2 = (1/3s(2))^2 * (4 - 1/3s(2) * ...), which can be written as k^2 = (1/3s(2))^2 * (4 - k). The 3s(2) becomes 9 * 2 = 18 when squared, so you're left with k^2 = (1/18) * (4 - k), and rearranging gives us the 18k^2 = 4 - k as expected.

    • @pkqualitymath1234
      @pkqualitymath1234  2 месяца назад +1

      Nice👍👍👍

  • @OmarAlHathaf
    @OmarAlHathaf 2 месяца назад +1

    Thank you very much for this nice work.
    Do you have a published book?
    I want to learn more from you.
    Thank you again.

    • @pkqualitymath1234
      @pkqualitymath1234  2 месяца назад +1

      Wow thanks a lot my friend haha. I am actually writing e-textbooks. I will let you know when they are published👍👍👍