Belgium 3-2 England | STUNNING VICTORY!!! 🤯 | Women's Nations League
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 31 окт 2023
- Our Belgian Red Flames faced and won against the European champions England in the Women's Nations League.
Subscribe for more video content ➡️ bit.ly/rbfayoutube 📺
More RBFA? Download our RBFA APP 👉 www.rbfa.be/app
🔗 www.rbfa.be 
Спорт
Great match! Beautiful goals of two teams: bravo les filles!
Fantastique victoire ! Goed gedaan meisjes ! Proud to be Belgian ! ⚽️🔥🇧🇪
Bien joué les red flammes pour la victoire
Congratulations Belgium. Such a great team performance. Saw England's weaknesses and exploited them.
Deloose very impressive performance.
Bravo les filles👏🇧🇪
BRAVO pour les red flammes maintenant il faut confirmer les deux matchs suivant dommage ce match nul contre l Ecosse il va peser fort dans la balance enfin elles ont prouvé qu elles en étaient capables , la qualification est possible WE ARE BELGIUM
Incroyable !
Niice, well done les Flames! 😎👌🏼
Congrats Belgium. Well done.
Grappig dat commentaar uit de jaren ‘60!
wauw !! Onze 2e goal
'England were amazing
But now they're not;
Sarina must make changes
To stop the rot.
As a patriotic chap -
I don't want them to be crap!'
onze eigen red flames!!!!!!!
"Onwaarschijnlijk"? Nee. Engeland is niet meer zo goed als ze ooit waren en België is een stuk beter dan ze voorheen waren. De eerste goal van Wullaerts lijkt veel op die van Renate Jansen (NL) tegen Engeland en toont aan dat Wiegman nog wat orde op zaken heeft te stellen in de verdediging.
Als Nederlander ben ik bepaald niet onpartijdig in deze, maar de wedstrijden op Wembley en in Tilburg zullen spannend worden, omdat alle drie teams nog kans maken op groepswinst.
Complimenten voor het team!
England is just playing the same game (which is typical of the painfully one-dimensional AngloSaxons) and Belgium is indeed progressing solidly. Very proud of the Red Flames!
Je suis fier d'être belge c'est les diables rouges ou les red flammes
ET
Nice !
Congrats. BTW: did the title writer intend to write 'Stunning Victory'? Who's responsible for copy editing?
Considering England had most of the game, I mean 74%?! And with all that fire power they have, they should have won that.
I think other Managers are getting used to Sarina Wiegman tactics and formation and she does not change it up, even the subs she makes, depending on how the game is going, are predictable.
She has been brilliant and she was the architect of that European win, but maybe a change of Management is needed, to freshen things up a bit.
That England Side is good enough to steamroller most Nations and certainly good enough to do it against Belgium.
The World Rankings alone will tell you that.
England lost the match against themselves, really. We knew from previous games where England's weak spot is, and some players seem out of form. Ironically, the manager situation is the same in Belgium. Very little rotation, ageing key players and absolutely no change in tactics during any game, whatsoever. As a Belgian I'm glad we won, but we really shouldn't celebrate these lucky wins as if we're *that* good.
To be a good team, 'fire power' and 'steamrolling' are insufficient. They indeed need a much better tactical game.
@@bartvaes4126 I have to agree with you and I would say your comment is spot on.
England should have won that match, but they did not and one could see that things were not going well and you cannot have that much of a game and still lose.
To be fair to Belgium, they took what little chances they had well and you cannot let a Team win, that has so little chances, especially not when you are one of the top Footballing Nations in the World.
Wiegman is brilliant, until something needs fixing and then she does not seem to have a clue.
It is like she makes substitutions, crosses her fingers and hopes for the best.
All she did last night was change like for like and keep the formation and tactic the same, which obviously was not working as well as it should have.
She started with a 4-5-1 and ended with one.
She lined the Team up with two Wide Players, which was right, as to get behind a Belgium Team that played very narrow, was the right tactic, but they did not play that way.
Kelly was getting behind and getting the crosses in, but they were mostly garbage and Hemp kept coming inside. so was useless as a Wide Player and yet Wiegman did nothing to change that.
Where Hemp was useless, Charles moved up, I presume to become the Wide Player, but that left a massive gap down that side, which Belgium exploited through Kees, Cayman and Blom and still Wiegman changed nothing.
Anyone with any Football Knowledge could see that, so why couldn't Wiegman?
Ives Serneels was seeing every England flaw and exploited it to the full and good for him and Wiegman did nothing to cover up those flaws, which is why I say "time for a change".
I am sure you will agree with me, it's ok being brilliant when things are going right, but a Manager/Coach has to also be brilliant when they are not.
Thank you for your comment, it is always nice to learn something new, from a different perspective :0)
@@MetteC5 I agree with you and you are right and as I have written to bartvaes4126, that is down to Wiegman.
@@neovarleydownes9109 👍
+14 MINUTEN OP DE HELFT???💀💀
There was an head injury that took a lot of time
@@Fghjklm752head to head 😅
ja, Greenwood en Blom botsten met het hoofd tegen elkaar tijdens een duel. De match lag een dikke 10 minuten stil en Greenwood werd afgevoerd naar het ziekenhuis en werd vervangen door Carter.
Tessa Wullaert >>> Ronaldo Nazario
No😂
@@user-ct2cj5iy5o trololololololololo ofcourse she is
Nazario: 0 goals against England Womens
Wullaert: 2