Milton Friedman on School Choice

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 июн 2013
  • Milton Friedman diagnoses the problem facing education and prescribes the antidote--competition via vouchers.
    Check out our Facebook page here: / freetochoosenetwork
    Visit our media website to find other programs here: freetochoosemedia.org/index.php
    Connect with us on Twitter here: / freetochoosenet
    Learn more about our company here: freetochoosenetwork.org/
    Shop for related products here: www.freetochoose.net/
    Stream from FreeToChoose.TV here: freetochoose.tv/

Комментарии • 24

  • @mortonguerrero2249
    @mortonguerrero2249 6 лет назад +30

    Students are no longer taught that they can learn and how to learn. They are pushed to pass standardized test, not how to think.

    • @miamivlad
      @miamivlad 4 года назад +1

      Agree. Students today are indoctrinated parrots who only know how to repeat what is taught, but have zero critical thinking and comprehension ability. 🤦‍♂️

  • @freetochoosenetwork
    @freetochoosenetwork  11 лет назад +3

    Thanks for the feedback, our pleasure!

  • @voodoolife
    @voodoolife 11 лет назад +18

    Liberty... I'm not sure that word is taught in public school... It seems to me that word has been replaced with entitlement...

  • @freetochoosenetwork
    @freetochoosenetwork  11 лет назад +3

    Also, so you know, you can watch almost all of our full productions, free, at freetochoose.tv
    However, these youtube clips are designed to educate in shorter clips.

  • @DD-ut2ew
    @DD-ut2ew 3 месяца назад

    Prophetic.

  • @MrVpassenheim
    @MrVpassenheim 6 лет назад +1

    When did he make this speech?

  • @cunjoz
    @cunjoz 7 лет назад +1

    what is the difference between a voucher and a state subsidy?

    • @ocvegasproperty
      @ocvegasproperty 7 лет назад +2

      Marko Ivančičević a voucher is still from the government but it is portable and you can take it to whatever school you would like. It is a form of subsidy. Typical subsidies are given directly to schools for the students that have. Usually students do not have a choice and go to schools based on where they live.

    • @DrCruel
      @DrCruel 7 лет назад +8

      The difference is in who ultimately gets to decide how the money is spent. Government officials distribute state subsidies. Vouchers allow consumers choice over who provides the service and who gets the money.

    • @kthcsh
      @kthcsh 7 лет назад +3

      the voucher allows a parent to take their child to any school of their choice. It is still a subsidy however parents and children wouldn't be trapped by zoning or school districts. the parents have greater choice

    • @davidcox2400
      @davidcox2400 6 лет назад +1

      There is NO difference. And with the voucher will come sooner or later ALL of the government regs that have turned public schools into government schools. And when the government regs have come, there will be NO choice - not at any price - because all schools will have become the same. Vouchers are a Trojan Horse for private schools.

    • @joncomas
      @joncomas 6 лет назад

      Bureaucracy.

  • @mariai9549
    @mariai9549 6 лет назад +3

    Yes sounds nice until the demand for that school causes the price of that tuition to go up and the parents don't have the money to pay for it or the school they want to send their kids to doesn't have enough capacity.
    Might as well just send them to private school on their own.

  • @cunjoz
    @cunjoz 7 лет назад +12

    First it's state education at the expense of home education. But now it's upbringing. Here in Croatia we almost had "School health education" which was to instill gay propaganda to little children. Family is the primary place of teaching values, not school, at least not at a systematic level.
    Even though we're a "democratic" country, the vestiges of communism are still very strong.