You are the first person I've seen to break down the workflow so nicely and dive deeply into each tool and how it works. And all for free, thank you so much!
great video. I am refamiliarizing myself with sculpting rocks. I been practicing improving my techniques and this video definitely helped in that regard. It is amazing how far you can get with just a single really well done rock or boulder. lol. I know this first hand wiht my own project was blown by how many times I was able to repeat it and not have any real repetition in the shape language.
The angle in which you tilt your pen will impact the sharpness and aggressiveness of different brushes in zBrush. Notably the trimsmoothborder in this case.
You can definitely optimize it to meet your needs. I'd always recommend some form of optimization pass. How far, and if you need to bake it depends on if you're using baked normals with or without tiling textures, or even using baked textures.
Thank you very much, this is very helpful to me, I am a landscape designer and my projects are basically rocks, waterfalls, plants. I've tackled plants and rocks, but haven't found a good waterfall asset yet. Do you have any waterfall assets that you recommend?
Definitely welcome! And that's a great question. (TLDR; I'd try EmberGen) I've heard similar feedback among different projects, and usually the solution is a tech artist making a custom sim in something like Houdini. With that said, i've used Fluid Flux and have liked the results from that, however i'm not sure if the capabilities will create the waterfall look you want. I'm going to start deep-diving EmberGen more, and I think this is probably where your solution is.
@@KingdomCrafter My project is more like architectural visualization. I only have to consider the real effect of the final exported animation. Water flow simulation, performance, etc. are not my considerations. Fluid Flux now achieves the effect I want, but I would like a more realistic effect. Thanks again for your reply and advice.
Yeah the 1st part isn't on the live section at the moment (quality was not so great), but I did edit it down and capture the key points in a Part 1 and Part 2 video
it still looks dirty. and not usable. it can be used for shapes, yes. but you wana slap on a real texture on it. that has real details. i would spend alot of time in making the geo when it comes to Uv , Zbrush unwrap sucks.
Really depends on your needs. There is not really a reason to spend an enormous amount of time UV'ing on assets like this. For example, my actual pipeline involves an Auto UV setup in Houdini which also will do other things such as collision or bakes if I need it to, and delivers very high quality results.
You are the first person I've seen to break down the workflow so nicely and dive deeply into each tool and how it works. And all for free, thank you so much!
Thank you, glad it was a good one for you!
Oh Yeah, this guy is only one I found really break down the process. And so so easy to understand it. Love the break down process!!! love and love !!
great video. I am refamiliarizing myself with sculpting rocks. I been practicing improving my techniques and this video definitely helped in that regard. It is amazing how far you can get with just a single really well done rock or boulder. lol. I know this first hand wiht my own project was blown by how many times I was able to repeat it and not have any real repetition in the shape language.
Thank you for the in-depth workflow overview. Awesome stuff I'll definitely try to put to good use.
Absolutely! And thank you, glad you enjoyed it
Very nice breakdown Ethan, love the music as well!
Glad you liked it!
@@KingdomCrafter whats the music in the timelapse of stage 3?
thank you very much viking
Absolutely, anytime! I'll be more active again on here soon.
Thanks for this, tons of useful info :)
Definitely welcome, and thanks for checking it out 💯
Awesome stuff! looks great in ue5
Much appreciated, definitely was coming together!
Premium content!! Looking forward for more.
Thank you! Definitely looking forward to getting more out soon, been a busy couple of months
are the in engine rocks (before the tileable was added) baked low poly versions? they look amazing
Yeah that's exactly right, and thank you!
I'm not sure what you mean by tilt your pen... I have a Wacom but tilting my pen is doing nothing different... is there a specific setting for that?
The angle in which you tilt your pen will impact the sharpness and aggressiveness of different brushes in zBrush. Notably the trimsmoothborder in this case.
Wouldn't you want to reduce the vert count before using it for games? Or rather bake it to a low poly?
You can definitely optimize it to meet your needs. I'd always recommend some form of optimization pass. How far, and if you need to bake it depends on if you're using baked normals with or without tiling textures, or even using baked textures.
Thank you very much, this is very helpful to me, I am a landscape designer and my projects are basically rocks, waterfalls, plants. I've tackled plants and rocks, but haven't found a good waterfall asset yet. Do you have any waterfall assets that you recommend?
Definitely welcome! And that's a great question. (TLDR; I'd try EmberGen) I've heard similar feedback among different projects, and usually the solution is a tech artist making a custom sim in something like Houdini. With that said, i've used Fluid Flux and have liked the results from that, however i'm not sure if the capabilities will create the waterfall look you want. I'm going to start deep-diving EmberGen more, and I think this is probably where your solution is.
Also to add to this, we are currently working on asset packs behind the scenes, and I will add this to the list 💯
@@KingdomCrafter My project is more like architectural visualization. I only have to consider the real effect of the final exported animation. Water flow simulation, performance, etc. are not my considerations. Fluid Flux now achieves the effect I want, but I would like a more realistic effect. Thanks again for your reply and advice.
@@marcus2002able Absolutely! And okay nice, yeah it's likely doing a sim would be the next step up, transferring data from Houdini to Niagara in UE
unrelated, sweet beard dude
Ohh yeah, thanks Shamus! 💪
the livestream u mentioned, I could only find the part 2 of it on your channel
Yeah the 1st part isn't on the live section at the moment (quality was not so great), but I did edit it down and capture the key points in a Part 1 and Part 2 video
@@KingdomCrafter thanks for the reply
it still looks dirty. and not usable. it can be used for shapes, yes. but you wana slap on a real texture on it. that has real details. i would spend alot of time in making the geo when it comes to Uv , Zbrush unwrap sucks.
Really depends on your needs. There is not really a reason to spend an enormous amount of time UV'ing on assets like this. For example, my actual pipeline involves an Auto UV setup in Houdini which also will do other things such as collision or bakes if I need it to, and delivers very high quality results.