@@BurgerTankCoach the Baltics always wanted to stay away from Russia as well as the USSR. The west always considered the Baltics illegally occupied by the USSR and never recognised it the Baltic republics as the part of the USSR.
It only shows the bad things... Which is propaganda. The countless wars US and UK har been part of in the same timeframe does not make them look any better.
Niclas Dahl Aabo So going by your logic we should dissolve the USA and the Uk because of 400 years of African slavery the genocide of the native and atrocities the British empire committed
@@200131356 No, because that's a crappy comparison. The Soviet Union had labor camps until 1987. Must of us were still alive back then. The US abolished slavery in 1865, none of us were alive back then. The USSR was horrible right up until Gorbachev opened it and made it more democratic. And as soon as the Warsaw pact and soviet republics saw democracy, they voted for independence. So they never wanted to be a part of it in the first place. If the soviet union wanted to stay together, it would have to keep being pretty fucked up. No democracy, labor camps, no freedom of speech etc. And more people would die in that scenario than in the conflicts we saw from the collapse. I never said Russia shouldn't exist as a country. But the soviet union has no place in the modern world. The baltic states have no interest in being under Russian rule. They never had. They have more in common with the west and Scandinavia.
Yeah, because stating facts from our world history is propaganda. You go ahead and keep watching RT, soon they'll tell you that Putin was the first person to swim across the atlantic and you'll believe it :)
bernd32 I live in Maryland and people here are ignorant when it comes to political science. I want to educate myself and others about political science. check out my channel. I am 16 years old. I make great content. I go to school most of the kids there don't understand politics. There are only corrupted by propaganda they don't understand. I understand politics . My youth brings a different view to news and political science. I offer smething different from Young turks and Info wars.
Nemtsov was not a leading figure in the Russian Opposition. The text is misleading and factually incorrect. Gennady Zyuganov is an example of a "real" opposition figure.
okay, BBC, that's about 20 or so negative facts about post-soviet Russia. Be so kind (just to stay true to your standards) and present a similar number of positive transitions that's been happening in Russia during the same period of time. Or is it not in your current "journalistic" interests?
Yeah, they could talk about human rights in Russia... Oh wait... They could talk about how democratic it is with freedom of speech and how the Russian journalists work for independent news papers, TV-stations or radio channels that isn't owned by the governemt... Oh snap. They could talk about how cheap vodka there is!
Kadaver85 your sarcasm is not appropriate here. Actually, all of the liberal/democratic postulates you've named have appeared in Russia during these 25 years literally from nothing! There was none before. The quality might not be the best yet, but it is already better than in many well-established democratic counties.
Anton Ivanov Which well-established democratic countries? I'm having a hard time even counting Russia as a democracy when they are no media outlets that isn't controlled by Kremlin. If you want to broadcast independently, you have to do it from a neighbouring country O_o
@@AaronRAaron The BBC would go to any extreme to serve the agenda of the Buckingham Palace and 10 Downing Street. It's not like it was the first time that BBC faked something up when their Crime Minister Tony B Liar conspired with George Bush and Collin Powell to invade Iraq in 2003.
but after all that bad take place ..Russia come back strongly as it has shown this from the day she has come into existence. Hope and pray from India for Russians
I liked the part at 0:55. They are making at look as though it was Russia who attacked Chechnya, when in fact, Russia was defending itself. In 1999 Chechnya broke the armstice and attacked Dagestan, one of the Federal subjects of Russia. I'm sure that if, say, Ireland tried to secede from the UK, become an extremist islamic state and wage war against them, the brits would love it...
Ok, you’ve got it all wrong, Ireland already “seceded” from UK all the way back in 1922. It’s Northern Ireland that remains apart of the UK. The Brits have already combatted their fair share of Islamic extremists, out in Iraq and Afghanistan, along with the US. Then people like you will call us tyrants. The hypocrisy…
BBC forgot about Tajikistan, a small mountain Persian speaker country in Central Asia, border with Afghanistan and China, where was civil war since 1991, died more than three hundred thousands (300,000) innocent people, because of USSR and democracy, it was a part of Soviet Union... I don't pay for showing my motherland
Let us see how devastated their ( all former USSR republics) history since the name of democracy landed. The intentions are pure, yet a strong meaning were not that visible. Hoping to restore the original UNITY in Diversity in that region rather than Division
no chance, russian has an economy no bigger than Italy's yet has a population 85 million more than Italy, furthermore the average russian earns 4 times less and lives 20 years less than the average westerner, maybe putin should focus on these domestic issues instead of engaging in foreign adventurism in places like syria.
Hmmmm i cant see whats wrong with that when russia make something bad theese channel post bad something about it When US does it BBC will make something why The US do it and why is it actually right (no offense) I love americans BTW
The success of Stalin - the man who used to boast that he conquered the United States "from the plow to the atomic bomb in just a generation" - compared to Gorbachev's failure shows that a socialist economy is unable to function with a minimum of efficiency without requiring a massive dose of political violence. In an attempt to reform a decadent regime, Gorbachev moved faster with the process of political opening in the hope of removing the predictable resistance that the Soviet bureaucracy would create to economic reform measures, as thorough proof with the failed attempt. coup d'état in August 1991 - which ended up precipitating the final crisis of socialism and the dissolution of the USSR itself Its Chinese parallel - Deng Xiaoping - adopted a logic diametrically opposed to that of Gorbachev: it prioritized the achievement of economic prosperity (adopting in practice capitalism) precisely to delay any attempt at political opening, as was evident with the acceleration of the economy. reforms after the Tiananmen Square massacre. It is important to note that it was Karl Marx himself who, in his Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, discerned the scenario in which the conditions for a social revolution process are formed, describing it as follows: “At a certain stage in its development, the material productive forces of society contradict existing production relations or - which is only their legal expression - with the property relations in which they have been active until then. From the forms of development of the productive forces, these relations are transformed into fetters of them. So, it is a time of social revolution. '* By rejecting the pursuit of profit maximization as an instrument to stimulate innovation, socialist countries ended up condemning themselves to obsolescence. Thus, they lost the chance to incorporate the productivity gains made possible by technological progress. That is why the capitalist countries managed to provide a greater rise in the standard of living of their population, even without pursuing the egalitarian ideal. Therefore, until the “final crisis of socialism” (to paraphrase K. Marx's own definitions once again), it was only a matter of time. But religious fanatics do not give up on their faith, even against the indisputable proof of the facts, which completely refute it! * Reproduced according to MARX, K. Preface to the Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, organized by Florestan Fernandes and published under the title K. Marx: Theory and historical process of the social revolution, In Marx & Engels, Great Social Scientists Collection, History, vol. 36. São Paulo: Ática, 1983. p. 232. Commemorative edition of the centenary of Karl Marx's death
Naa nanti di Boris yalsin kalau PUTIN DI G-20 BAWA DENGAN DOKUMEN KALAU MARAH MARAH BISA BISA HANCUR LEBUR HABIS HABISAN KAYAKNYA YAA??? JADI DI USAHAKAN JANGAN MARAH MARAH HEE ????? MASA TUDAK ADA MARAH MARAH HEE???? INGAT UNGAT DAN INGAT HEE???
This is why Boris Yeltsin is so loved in the West.
He was better than putin
@@249pro6 Only if you're a Westerner, Russian liberal living in the West, or a Russian mobster.
@@BolshevikCarpetbagger1917 Putin is a murderer.
@@srccde Putin is an amateur when measured against the West as far as murder goes.
@@BolshevikCarpetbagger1917 greeting from Iraq comarad
So, what BBC showed to us. When USSR gone, life in countries, which were part of it become worse. Look like BBC really sad about end of USSR:)
Life in Estonia has been so much better.
@@oskariranta1122 Good.
For a lot of people at western europe and some ex-soviet republics, like the Baltic states, the life is very much better today!
@@heberpelagio7161 cause they don't have putin in charge
@@BurgerTankCoach the Baltics always wanted to stay away from Russia as well as the USSR. The west always considered the Baltics illegally occupied by the USSR and never recognised it the Baltic republics as the part of the USSR.
When you lack the balls to tackle terrorism head on and instead proxy support the least you can do is not vilify those who take them head on
Russians upset because it shows footage of Russia - makes total sense.
Vladimir Kolsov I'm not upset and I'm russian
Kremlin bot
It only shows the bad things... Which is propaganda. The countless wars US and UK har been part of in the same timeframe does not make them look any better.
Soviet union: *last online 29 years ago*
Nazi: *last online 76 year ago*
Nazi: online
Soviet Ended Nazism
Communism : Online Now
Nazi: Online Now 😈
In Rump state of USSR - Russia
Dissolve the USSR they said, things would be better they said lol...
We need to restore it
Wtf is wrong with these people
Ironically more people died in soviet prison camps than all of the conflicts caused by it's collapse combined. So I would say worth it.
Niclas Dahl Aabo So going by your logic we should dissolve the USA and the Uk because of 400 years of African slavery the genocide of the native and atrocities the British empire committed
@@200131356 No, because that's a crappy comparison. The Soviet Union had labor camps until 1987. Must of us were still alive back then. The US abolished slavery in 1865, none of us were alive back then. The USSR was horrible right up until Gorbachev opened it and made it more democratic. And as soon as the Warsaw pact and soviet republics saw democracy, they voted for independence. So they never wanted to be a part of it in the first place. If the soviet union wanted to stay together, it would have to keep being pretty fucked up. No democracy, labor camps, no freedom of speech etc. And more people would die in that scenario than in the conflicts we saw from the collapse. I never said Russia shouldn't exist as a country. But the soviet union has no place in the modern world. The baltic states have no interest in being under Russian rule. They never had. They have more in common with the west and Scandinavia.
I think there's too many Russia-related videos on BBC.
Hmm, what would that mean?
Yeah, because stating facts from our world history is propaganda. You go ahead and keep watching RT, soon they'll tell you that Putin was the first person to swim across the atlantic and you'll believe it :)
bernd32 I live in Maryland and people here are ignorant when it comes to political science. I want to educate myself and others about political science. check out my channel. I am 16 years old. I make great content. I go to school most of the kids there don't understand politics. There are only corrupted by propaganda they don't understand. I understand politics . My youth brings a different view to news and political science. I offer smething different from Young turks and Info wars.
bernd32 Get a life Russian troll-man
Kremlinbot
@@lightblue254 yep that's me
was this the BBC's attempt at an Anti-Russian propaganda video?
Frank for you russian lovers, everything is anti-russia propaganda. Have you at least watched the video?
João Victor Lima de Souza yes
João Victor Lima de Souza im not a Russian lover but i can at least see this is giving a very negative image of Russia
It is presenting facts, some of them are inconvenient to those who support Russia without thinking.
so stating facts from history is now russian propaganda?
Nemtsov was not a leading figure in the Russian Opposition. The text is misleading and factually incorrect. Gennady Zyuganov is an example of a "real" opposition figure.
The days when I was in my moms ovaries.
Ксения Ковалевская
The North Remembers
when we leave, will be horor
BaHllloT Winter is coming.
I was just a sperm
Ксения Ковалевская u hot
okay, BBC, that's about 20 or so negative facts about post-soviet Russia. Be so kind (just to stay true to your standards) and present a similar number of positive transitions that's been happening in Russia during the same period of time. Or is it not in your current "journalistic" interests?
Welcome to BBC.
Yeah, they could talk about human rights in Russia... Oh wait... They could talk about how democratic it is with freedom of speech and how the Russian journalists work for independent news papers, TV-stations or radio channels that isn't owned by the governemt... Oh snap.
They could talk about how cheap vodka there is!
Anton Ivanov There are none
Kadaver85 your sarcasm is not appropriate here. Actually, all of the liberal/democratic postulates you've named have appeared in Russia during these 25 years literally from nothing! There was none before. The quality might not be the best yet, but it is already better than in many well-established democratic counties.
Anton Ivanov Which well-established democratic countries? I'm having a hard time even counting Russia as a democracy when they are no media outlets that isn't controlled by Kremlin. If you want to broadcast independently, you have to do it from a neighbouring country O_o
everyone: Things would be better if Soviet Union falls
After Soviet Union falls:
what a beautifull christmas gift! Thank you BBC!
*russia and ukraine sign a friendship treaty*
Also russia: *i own you*
Ever since the end of the ussr, theres been a downward spiral
Russia has always had a strong man leader, from the Czars, to the Soviets, through to present day in Putin.. ... It's not hard to figure out.
1:19 That can't be 2001, the quality's too good.
They did have HD technology available back then, but used it very rarely.
@@AaronRAaron The BBC would go to any extreme to serve the agenda of the Buckingham Palace and 10 Downing Street. It's not like it was the first time that BBC faked something up when their Crime Minister Tony B Liar conspired with George Bush and Collin Powell to invade Iraq in 2003.
@@resnica3557 what are you on about? Why is that even relevant?
2001 had great camera quality, Even the 90s was fine.. how old are you?
please make longer explanatory videos. You are doing us a disservice by making things too short
I remember that "Teddy bear with iron jaws" Regan was in office back then and the "cold war" was still going..... Dam I feel ol'e
Why don't you talk about freeing Aleppo from the resistance
They are only "freedom fighters" planting flowers.
yes children would be celebrating in the streets of aleppo if they weren't killed by Russian airstrikes.
A whole lot has happened in Russia since 2016…
The traitors destroy the great mighty USSR..
Russia: we should divide the land up evenly. I think i'll take like 85% of it though.
others: *draw weapon*
lol, like nothing good ever happens in Russia...
For BBC and Britain bad events in Russia are good since Russian Empire times
but after all that bad take place ..Russia come back strongly as it has shown this from the day she has come into existence. Hope and pray from India for Russians
Info Warrior The bad things are still going on, Einstein
Nothing about Nagorno-Karabakh...
Fallen but never forgotten
I liked the part at 0:55. They are making at look as though it was Russia who attacked Chechnya, when in fact, Russia was defending itself. In 1999 Chechnya broke the armstice and attacked Dagestan, one of the Federal subjects of Russia. I'm sure that if, say, Ireland tried to secede from the UK, become an extremist islamic state and wage war against them, the brits would love it...
They were defending themselves by invading?
Ok, you’ve got it all wrong, Ireland already “seceded” from UK all the way back in 1922. It’s Northern Ireland that remains apart of the UK. The Brits have already combatted their fair share of Islamic extremists, out in Iraq and Afghanistan, along with the US. Then people like you will call us tyrants. The hypocrisy…
"If you dont miss CCCP (USSR) you have no heart, but if you want it to return, you have no soul."
Proxy_Clipzy not soul. It’s brain.
not a soul, its brain
The world was more peaceful when the USSR was around and it was around today placed like the Middle East would be better
Can we make a movie about how many wars USA has started for the last decade ?
Polly P That will take 6 movies and 7 books....
It will return
Now suppose someone in USSR manages to somehow watch it in 1991...
The region has always seen protests and demonstrations since collapse of the mighty USSR
BBC forgot about Tajikistan, a small mountain Persian speaker country in Central Asia, border with Afghanistan and China, where was civil war since 1991, died more than three hundred thousands (300,000) innocent people, because of USSR and democracy, it was a part of Soviet Union... I don't pay for showing my motherland
Idiot. The civil war broke out exactly because the USSR was gone.
I forgot all these things had happened. Yikes
This makes nowadays events more …. The red flags have been here for all long.
polonium poisoning ??? damn these Russians are crazy xD
Erfan Moradi read an article about this. I assume you don't know what happened
Erfan Moradi That guy was an ex-KGB agent. He had to die! I suppose MI-6 do all the same with betrayer's scum.
How about Russia 31 years since the USSR, please make one
Let us see how devastated their ( all former USSR republics) history since the name of democracy landed. The intentions are pure, yet a strong meaning were not that visible. Hoping to restore the original UNITY in Diversity in that region rather than Division
Where real man cried...
Who’s the Irish reporter please?
0:23 Intelligence personel stationed abroad by the CCCP were they transferred to russia or ukraine?
May one day our Soviet motherland shall through the ashes to the top again!
no chance, russian has an economy no bigger than Italy's yet has a population 85 million more than Italy, furthermore the average russian earns 4 times less and lives 20 years less than the average westerner, maybe putin should focus on these domestic issues instead of engaging in foreign adventurism in places like syria.
30 years now.
@0:44 some friendship treaty that was 🙄
you forgot the gas shut down and annexation of Crimea.
people in West hate Russia and Russia hate back , that's all it is , show some love u will get love back
да нам вообще по хуй на вас - на хуй вас ненавидеть ?
everybody owns those tanks now
The BBC is so good at hating others. That's truly professional.
Waiting for "The London Bridge has Fallen"
Indians want that to happen
Its 30 years now since the end of the ussr
Это было страшное время.
@Synergy Speaks it dissolved
1999 - belgrade, thats was point
yeah. That was the key moment when Russians understood that West is NOT a friend.
true
Hmmmm i cant see whats wrong with that when russia make something bad theese channel post bad something about it
When US does it BBC will make something why The US do it and why is it actually right (no offense)
I love americans BTW
BBC please do the same now with the US
Did they the same for USA ?
Now the west is in conflict also
причем здесь Узбекистан вообще? бред, такую чушь в одну кучу накидали.
evil empire,how many people's lives destroyed these fascists
Thanks to your Stalin, Georgia. Dumbass.
Propagated by west
Love to Russia 🇷🇺 from India 🇮🇳
how does it feel to be a supporter of fascists?
The success of Stalin - the man who used to boast that he conquered the United States "from the plow to the atomic bomb in just a generation" - compared to Gorbachev's failure shows that a socialist economy is unable to function with a minimum of efficiency without requiring a massive dose of political violence. In an attempt to reform a decadent regime, Gorbachev moved faster with the process of political opening in the hope of removing the predictable resistance that the Soviet bureaucracy would create to economic reform measures, as thorough proof with the failed attempt. coup d'état in August 1991 - which ended up precipitating the final crisis of socialism and the dissolution of the USSR itself
Its Chinese parallel - Deng Xiaoping - adopted a logic diametrically opposed to that of Gorbachev: it prioritized the achievement of economic prosperity (adopting in practice capitalism) precisely to delay any attempt at political opening, as was evident with the acceleration of the economy. reforms after the Tiananmen Square massacre.
It is important to note that it was Karl Marx himself who, in his Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, discerned the scenario in which the conditions for a social revolution process are formed, describing it as follows:
“At a certain stage in its development, the material productive forces of society contradict existing production relations or - which is only their legal expression - with the property relations in which they have been active until then. From the forms of development of the productive forces, these relations are transformed into fetters of them. So, it is a time of social revolution. '*
By rejecting the pursuit of profit maximization as an instrument to stimulate innovation, socialist countries ended up condemning themselves to obsolescence. Thus, they lost the chance to incorporate the productivity gains made possible by technological progress. That is why the capitalist countries managed to provide a greater rise in the standard of living of their population, even without pursuing the egalitarian ideal. Therefore, until the “final crisis of socialism” (to paraphrase K. Marx's own definitions once again), it was only a matter of time. But religious fanatics do not give up on their faith, even against the indisputable proof of the facts, which completely refute it!
* Reproduced according to MARX, K. Preface to the Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, organized by Florestan Fernandes and published under the title K. Marx: Theory and historical process of the social revolution, In Marx & Engels, Great Social Scientists Collection, History, vol. 36. São Paulo: Ática, 1983. p. 232. Commemorative edition of the centenary of Karl Marx's death
Naa nanti di Boris yalsin kalau PUTIN DI G-20 BAWA DENGAN DOKUMEN KALAU MARAH MARAH BISA BISA HANCUR LEBUR HABIS HABISAN KAYAKNYA YAA??? JADI DI USAHAKAN JANGAN MARAH MARAH HEE ????? MASA TUDAK ADA MARAH MARAH HEE???? INGAT UNGAT DAN INGAT HEE???
Was this the BBC's first anti propaganda video on Russia?
Reminds one of just how piss-poor historical summaries of events can be.
Hey, even China's state-own TV channel can make a less lousy propaganda than this one
BBC is just too shy to show the truth
Thank you Russia
Western propaganda at its best....
Лет
Лет
czech-chen-nyahh
lol
666 likes
THANK YOU AFGHANISTAN FOR BRINIGNG DOWN THE USSR 🇦🇫🇦🇫 LMAOOOO
)
Glory to putin!
Command_Unit Death to Putin, glory to the USSR
Poorly made propaganda. BBC needs to rewatch Soviet propaganda to see how things are supposed to be done in this Business.
Putin will be immemorialized. Bad ass leader.
Delirium bbc you aren’t good news more