Do you think the interview would have been better had Tucker and Putin had a team of people who were working on content? To be sure Putin had no what his audience wanted to hear.
British author and political commentator Douglas Murray interviews Israel's Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu on TalkTV: ruclips.net/video/F57xdV_mIsA/видео.html
In an interview with Russian citizens, Putin answers various questions for 4-5 hours every year in December! For him, 2 hours with one person is an easy walk.
I saw that in a previous comment and I'd like to check one of those out. It emphasizes how unique this conversation was because of their different styles.
@@talktochrismillerRT has the one of the most extensive archives available to watch speeches and interviews from Putin over the years that can be viewed in one spot. Just thought I'd throw it out there in case it's something that might help save time looking for sources.
Putin doesn't living in Kremlin! Admistration work in this big building. He lives at different area out of Moscow. He is working there and completely administrative
@@talktochrismiller Putin is used to answer unseen questions without notes, teleprompter or an aide whispering in his ear. He knows history, understands economics and does not use euphemisms, but says directly what he wants to say. No spinning a bottle around. All qualities of a true statesman. No wonder his approval rate is steadily about 80%. Our western leaders can only dream about such numbers.
Putin said, "Is this going to be a talk show or a serious discussion?" (Well 30 seconds did becond nearly 30 mjnutes but...) War is a serious issues and the geopolitical, historical complexities need to be understood. Western corporate media provides zero insights into these complexities. Personally, as an American (tax paying/funder of war) I feel the urgency to get educated.
Professors John Mearshiemer and Jeffrey Sachs will have fully grasped Resident Putin's 30 minutes introduction, and insight, others, such as Hillary Rodham Clinton, Victoria Nuland, and those with a shorter attention span, like President Joseph Robin Biden Jnr, less so, but Tucker Carlson a professional journalist and interviewer, was able to absorb the interlude, and the anecdotes skillfully, with ease, making this meeting informative, and brilliant, well done to both men present 💯%👍🏻.
Either way a bridge has been created . This interview will open up a lot of eyes and minds and hopefully lead open mindedness and peace . Brave Tucker for doing this for a greater cause . Bravo Putin brilliant as ever . Mature analysis, great .
Just like Trump said before , why not open a dialogue between Russia and the western world? For too long, USA has been holding Russia as enemy of the states, why? Politicians, Republicans or Democrats, are alway acting so righteous and noble by attacking Putin without truly understand their own motive or trying to please the misinformed publics.
Мы благодарны Такеру за то, что он дал возможность сказать нашему президенту то, что он хотел. Мы в России понимаем,что это интервью было не для нас, потому что мы знаем все, о чем говорит Путин: и нашу историю, и наши намерения, и отношение запада к нам. Это было послание западному зрителю. И очень хочется верить, что нашего президента услышали те, к кому он обращался. Мы за мир, всегда были за мир, и будем за мир, кто бы что ни говорил.
@@Alikot1 Translation: We are grateful to Tucker for having given the opportunity to our president to say what he wanted to say. We in Russia understand that this interview was not for us, because we know what Putin was talking about: Our history, our aims, and the relations of the West towards us. This was a message to Western people. We really want to believe that our president is heard by the people he addressed. We are for peace, we have always been for peace, and we will be for peace, regardless what other people say.
Putin started the interview by taking his watch off. That is a major signal that Putin was sitting down to have a long talk without rush. He was giving his time to Tucker but will also not be pressed to respond to his questions.
Chris Miller is critical. of Putin because he is intending to criticize Puttin because he is trying to make false propaganda perhaps defending U.S. and Nato the evil empires Chris be more honest and tell the true instead of prospect devils in the world and warmongers.
In fact, his message with that non-verbal gesture could mean: I'm not in a hurry, time works for me. Do you want to come to an agreement or will the wheel of time run over you.
the president was very impressive...his answer to every issue that tucker chucked at him was eloquently articulated. to me it was epic interview and riveting. the truth was delivered convincingly with confidence without enforcing body language that would help convince the public ...
Interview wasn't shaky. this exactly what Putin planned and was really smart - first 20-25 he explained the history since most American's have no clue and the fundamental infomtaion on why this conflict is happening.
@talktochrismiller I understand why Putin launched into a passionate monologue. The Englishman and the Russian set their heavy cast-iron buttocks on what should later become their development area. The Russians who marched across Eurasia to reach Alaska and Northern California and the Brits who got into every terrestrial hole wanted to know everything about the place they had colonized and were about to explore. The Americans in their outbound activities, on the contrary, pursue a butterfly policy leaping from Nicaragua to Somali and Ukraine and paying no attention to specifics of indigenous environment
Russians are in general a historically aware and interested people. Putin is a historically minded Russian. The historical start to this excellent and worthwhile interview did not surprise me!
They are, but unfortunately they're fed the wrong history. Of course all countries tend to tweak history somewhat to favour themselves, but Russia takes this to an extreme.
@@istvanglock7445He didn't tell a lie. So what's the problem? I see US media feed lies to their public on a daily basis changing events which happened in my life time, but russians are the one rewriting history? Bfr
Putin was in the KGB. He is smart he has a law degree. He is a martial artist. He knows exactly how to manage a conversation. Even if the interview happened in the United States Putin would still be sitting the same way and be relaxed.
Keep in mind Dr.Putin has a PhD in economics with a focus on planning for the mineral economy. It’s no surprise the Russian Empire outmaneuvered the harshest sanctions in history. Hell sanctions even backfired onto Europe and is crushing the EU’s economies
Not sure what that means…do you mean in plain enough language for a young person to understand? That doesn’t mean the political hacks aren’t working at ways to imprint their muddle on it. Thank you, Tucker, for a mature effort to establish some understanding. God help us all.
This wasn't a conversation, nor was it intended to be. It was intended to be, or at least it was sold as, an interview. But it turned out to be a monologue.
@@istvanglock7445 you’re complaining about Putin taking 20 mins to explain his countries history? I think it was very important to do that since most Americans know nothing about Russia other than what they’ve been fed by the media as far as questions go he asked good questions that were a mix of easy and hard for example the question about Putin trying to get rid of Nazism in Ukraine and Tucker asking how he will do that if he doesn’t even control Ukraine. Another one was why he attacked Ukraine. It’s really important to get the “enemies” perspective rather than just hating them for no reason
@@riyoszu I wasn't complaining about anything, just stating facts. Read what I said. Russian history is not a secret, so there's no good reason for most Americans not to acquaint themselves with it, just as there's no reason for Putin not to do the same. You seem to have not been paying much attention over the last 2 years. There was nothing new in this monologue - Putin has been trying to justify this invasion for that length of time. The good thing was that Putin confirmed that his primary reason for invading Ukraine was in taking the first step toward recreating the Russian Empire. You think people hate Russia for no reason? Where in God's name have you been since Feb 2022? The totally unjustified invasion of a sovereign nation, followed by the Bucha and other atrocities, the rapes, the murders, the deliberate targeting of civilians. Russia has truly shown the world what it is. Many knew what it was already. But too many Americans still don't have a clue. That ridiculous comment about Nazism reveals you to be a Russian troll. Even the most stupid Americans don't buy into that nonsense.
The smug, sophomoric presumptions of American Exceptionalism meets age-old, historic and pragmatic reality. This conversation illustrates the difference between historical realities and pragmatic wisdom compared to nationalistic propaganda and hegemonic arrogance. The fact that so few Americans were NOT intentionally privileged with this dialogue speaks volumes about American intentionality.
Good analysis, thank you. Only, your last statement that both Carlson and Putin are doing things to push closer to addressing the topic using whatever means including manipulation, is a very western perspective. Actually I would say Putin was being extremely neutral and direct but that itself required detail - so his conversational style was unfamiliar to me, as a westerner, mostly because he *avoided* rhetoric, and wanted to provide substance and meaning. Carlson in turn should be praised for giving Putin the chance to actually express ideas, which as far as I can find no other western journalist has ever done, period.
"The smug, sophomoric presumptions of American Exceptionalism meets age-old, historic and pragmatic reality." Compare that to reception Elon Musk experienced while procuring rockets from Russia in 2001. The "Pragmatic reality" is delusional, controlling of the masses, and stifling of the Entrepreneur (i.e. American Exceptionalism). Musk succeeded despite the naysayers and haters. That is also American Exceptionalism for in Russia, he would have been in jail just like Yukos founder, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, and under a permanent unjustified Red Notice like Bill Browder still remains under.
Excellent analysis of what turned out to be a surprisingly important interview for those wanting to understand the thinking of this fascinating world leader.
A western audience wants some bullet points or a "listicle" as they don't have the attention span to digest a long history lesson about complex geopolitical events.
I think this is the assumption of what they want because this is what has intentionally been offered by the mainstream media to achieve the desired outcomes of those in power. It's been shown that there's a huge demand for the long form media especially when it comes to the news and current events. Long form media is well on its way to becoming the preferred option of getting information by the majority of the public.
Americans are bottom line people. We want others to get to the point. It is just our style. I think most of us in the USA wonder why we are even there and butting into a situation that really doesn't involve us. Same for Israel and Gaza. We have enough problems at home and should mind our own business. I think we make these situations worse overseas. Tucker's questions pop the propaganda balloon we hear at home about the intentions of Putin.
Putin visibly removed his wristwatch as the interview started too, maybe he planned to, maybe force of habit---but this really communicated that he was in for an intricate, serious, and thorough conversation
I don't wear watches, or bracelets or any other jewelry because my skin sweats and irritates under a bracelet, when I wear one. It causes discomfort for me, in short words. May be, Putin has similar problem, so he removed his watch so they wouldn't distract him during serious conversation. Or, may be, he just took them off and put in front of him to control timing, so he wouldn't need to check them time from time, which could have been interpreted as eagerness, or irritation.
I don't understand why we are discussing Russia's ancient history? If Putin wants to start reclaiming historical territories, he should begin with himself and return the Russian Far East to China. Ukrainians don't need to prove their historical right to exist. They have their own culture, their own language, and the entire world, including Putin, has long recognized them. Why not focus on resolving issues rather than revisiting ancient history?
@@mariajones8304 судя по всему Вы пропустили историческую справку... Украина как государство появилось после 1991 года и на тот момент культура, язык, история и прочее на 90% - русские! То что происходит сейчас - насильственная украинизация из-за которой в том числе стал сопротивляться восток Украины. Представте картину, допустим мексиканцы в США из Техаса приходят к власти и говорят - все США мексиканцы, государственный язык во всем США - испанский, запрещено учить, смотреть СМИ, кино и т.д. , обращаться в госсударственные рганы, медицина и прочее - запрещены на английском, культура, история, обычаи - никогда не было США, все мексиканское... Всё наследие США уничтожается (памятники, история и т.д.) вместо них воздвигаются памятники героям, которые уничтожали в свое время американцев (это конечно сложно представить, так как америка не вела на своей территории внешних войн, но допустим)... север США поднимает мятеж против этого, мексиканцы объявляю ВСЕХ жителей севера террористами и посылает (против конституции) свою армию бомбить север США - вот что произошло на Украине простым языком - указ временно исполняющего обязанности президента Украины Турчинова от 14.04.2014г. (АТО - антитеррористическая операция), с этого и началась война на Украине - гражданская!!! Армия Украины пошла убивать население Украины на востоке (Донбасе)!!! И Минские соглашения - между властями Украины и представителями Донбаса, Россия не участник соглашений, а их гарант как и Германмя, Франция! Еще раз - война на Украине началась 14.04.2014 года с Указа верховной власти Украины!!!
Very interesting thank you for producing this and giving your insight. I just find it So disheartening that we have such talented and intelligent people like yourself in the United States but yet we allow the most evil, corrupt and selfish people to make decisions on our behalf. Given what’s happening lately maybe the tide is finally turning…
I thougbht it was a great interview. The Anglo-saxon media was very dismissive and called it a major anti-climax for both concerned, I'm not so sure. Putin was clearly not the freak he has been depicted as. And I think a lot of people could relate to Carlson in this interview and can recount similar positions they have faced themselves. Overall I think he did a great job. And given its viewership, I can't see how this could be considered a failiure.
Putin's talking and facial expression in more genuine than other politicians we are familiar with... Thank you for going into detail about the interview - I just found your channel and already following you Mr. Miller - keep up your great work so more people can understand others more instead of leaning towards the hate campaign by the deep states.
Yep. Especially when talking to Tucker about the "de-nazification" ... you could see this subject was still sensitive to Putin. Born in 1952, WWII had only been over for 7 years at that point.
I've watched a lot of videos after that interview. This is a really great interview. For me, as a Russian person, it was very important that we were heard all over the world, in particular in English-speaking countries. Because many people have heard only one position on this issue. And if you haven't changed your mind, but at least listened, then this is a great victory on the path to peace.
Fun Fact about Russia: It was Russia who saved The Union during the American Civil War as they sent their Navy to San Francisco and New York when England and France were just about to enter the war on the side of the Confederates since London created the Confederates. France was already in Mexico making a spear head movement to resupply the Confederates and to open up a Pacific Theatre and to create a port in California. England already amassed 11,000 troops and growing stationed at their Northern Confederacies border now called Canada ready to open a Northern Theatre to divert Union troops away from their Southern Confederacy then to attack The Unions naval blockade. The Union would have been completely destroyed and annexed by those two great powers leaving the Confederates to exist as either a puppet state of London or to be fully brought back into the fold of the British Empire. London was already courting (threatening/bribing) other countries to get involved like Spain while Russia was in talks with Prussia to ally with incase London was to intervene. Seeing all of this Tsar Alexander II wrote a letter to Queen Victoria saying “If you enter in this war it will be a casus belli for all out war with the Russian Empire”. The stage was set for the 1st World War and Russia stopped it. There is also a memorial in San Francisco for the hundreds of Russian sailors who came off their Asiatic fleet ships that died while helping the city put out a fire that threatened to lay waste to it during the War.
The Russian fleet also threatened to Shell Australian ports along with other British Pacific Colonies if Britain aided the Confederates. A confederate war ship spent a lot of time in Australian waters and was supported by the Australian public, some even signing on as crew members. This Confederate war ship laid waist to the US Pacific whaling fleet and is reported to have fired the last shot in the war. The name of the ship was called the CSS Shenandoah. Its surrender was at Liverpool England where Confederate Commander Bulloch was stationed Russia also helped Thailand (Kingdom of Siam) maintain its sovereignty from being completely Partitioned/Annexed from the British and French around the same time. The very word Thai (ไทย) means 'free man' in the Thai language which is partially to thank to the Russians as they might have ended up being a colony or part of another country/colony if not for their intervention.
About question of Nord Stream, Putin knew Tucker was rejected from CIA application when he was young, so he become journalist....and made some kind of joke...#You did it?
Learn about how many "journalists" worldwide are actually members of the c... Who do you think defined the "news" we are supposed to hear, read or see? I am surprised to discover so many naive people in our civilised west...
Не совсем так. В русском языке местоимение: "Вы" имеет два значения: 1. Единственное число этого местоимения - это уважительное обращение к собеседнику, например: Это сделали Вы, Такер!, и 2. Множественное число - это обращение к нескольким людям, например: Это сделали вы, граждане США. Путин говорит ""вы" во множественном числе, имея в виду США, потому что он достаточно воспитан, чтобы не вешать всех собак на Карлсона. Но в переводе получается игра слов, в которой реакция Такера бесценна)) Наша благодарность этому смелому и честному журналисту.
No. It's complete BS. If it's true that Tucker's father is CIA and his son wanted to serve they would have found a job for him. No, the CIA did not reject Tucker- he " rejected " them.
In all analyzes of the interview, it was noted how long Putin's introduction was and how far back in time he went. No one from the US side humbly asked where the usa were in 862 when they already had their own history and country? The life of the usa began in 1779 with the genocide of the local population. Decisions and implementation of what is good and what is not in the world were appropriated by the USA with the argument of force and weapons. And that in a society of cultures where, in fact, no one allowed usa to speak at all, let alone judge. The only freedom usa have in this historical context is to humbly keep quiet, listen and learn. Especially because it is so painfully evident that everything that has been done on the world stage by the usa in the last 150 years has been a big (primarily moral) failure with far-reaching consequences for everyone. Deep retrospection and a large dose of humility are urgently needed. This is actually the wisely hidden and gentlemanly message of Putin's long introduction.
Americans are a young nation. Very young. This is evident from the actions. Russian philosophers, analysts and political scientists say that sometimes Americans resemble spoiled children in their behavior in the world. The American identity is 250 years old. This is the age of the Bolshoi Theatre in Moscow. It's a Russian joke.
This conversation is the closest I've seen Tucker Carlson get to a logical, dialectical dialogue in his efforts to disclose the truth to his viewers, to the American people, about everything that Russia is, means, and stands for in addition to being the biggest country in the world.
Excellent analysis, Chris! Your insights on cultural differences, storytelling, and communication style made this fascinating to watch. Would love to see more of these insights from you in future videos. Putin comes across as the seasoned storyteller with Carlson, who seems too gobsmacked or starstruck to probe deeper. I get the impression he was learning about some of these historic events for the first time, which put him at a disadvantage.
Don't let Tucker fool you he will be what he needs to be in order to get the audience to absorb as much information as possible. It's especially true here when many people were watching Putin be interviewed for the first time in their lives. Tucker is very well versed on the topic of Russia and its history but he is doing this for an audience who is not informed. He is playing the role of his audience who has been subjectively sheltered from being informed as well as outright lied to by the government on the subject of Russia. Most media is edited and polished before being shown to the public and it's quite obvious this was untouched and raw footage which is a credit to Tucker imho.
Tucker and Putin both share a love of history. Putin mentioned that in the beginning. I don't think the history lesson was for Tucker. If you listen to military men they often go over the history of a country. Listen to Col. McGregor talk. He goes into depth about history in his responses. Bush Jr. understood Russia more because Condi Rice was an expert on Russia. She spoke the language. Nuland who was in Obama's admin had family on her father's side from Bessarabia which was a part of Russia at one point. I don't think Putin has anyone in his admin that came from America and now works with him. At least now Putin has someone like Tucker to give him air time. I think what happened is very important. America and Russia should at least respect each other. Both cultures have good and bad to them like all cultures do.
The history of Russia has more than 1000 years, and this is only what is confirmed by documents, the originals of which are in Russia. Putin told the story very briefly, just to understand the ties between Russia and Ukraine. In Russian schools, all children study history in more detail, with dates, photos of documents, names, events, background, analysis of what happened. History has been studied in schools for several years without fail. This is called education.
История за 30 секунд - это сарказм. Невозможно рассказать историю России за такое короткое время, но это всё равно была максимально сокращенная версия.😂 И тут больше не про Россию, сколько про Украину и почему он считает её искусственно созданной страной. Всем мира
To a Western audience the historical component would be almost meaningless as most westerners would have little understanding or a web/mindset to make sense of all the cultural, historical information unless they had specific knowledge or expertise in this area. Tucker despite his journalistic skills was at times baffled by the educational component of Putin's comprehensive account of the many relevant background factors. Those who have had a solid grounding in history particularly Russian/Ukrainian would not have not been surprised by anything Putin stated. There was nothing new here. Putin's goal during the initial part of the interview was simply to expound on ithe relevance of issues which are not generally known in the West. Putin covered the entire interview in an articulate,, civilised, coherent and lucid manner. There are few world leaders who are capable of demonstrating such a level of communication & statesmanship !
Putin stated at the beginning that Tucker was fond of history like Putin is. Tucker had a college major in history? Didn't Putin say that? I don't think think the history lesson was for Tucker. Putin's history lesson was about a country that share a culture and faith which made them unified and successful. I think it was important to establish that Ukraine has many cultures/languages attached to it including Russian and that Russian connection goes way back. I believe Russia had a President from Kiev and another from the Donbass area. Someone correct me if I am wrong. There really isn't any Ukraine culture so why is Zelensky now denying the contributions of Russians living there? Why are we not hearing the close relationship Russians have had with Ukraine? Ukraine also has a rich history of Orthodox Christianity. The story Putin told was about a Town that has one of the oldest churches there. I think this is why Putin has not flattened Ukraine. Ukraine and Russia relationship seems a bit similar to USA and Canada relationship or India and Nepal. If Western forces had not gotten involved I think the Russians and Ukranians would have resolved this by now. Putin seems to want to make Russia Great Again. What is wrong with that? That is his job as their leader. Both Tucker Carlson and Putin are subjects of misinformation and character assassination. They have that in common even thought they are from different countries. Some have said this is reminiscent of the The Kennedy-Khruschev Exchanges. Carlson may be paving the way for Trump to have diplomatic dialog with Russia in the future. I vote for diplomatic dialog over nuclear war!!
@@elibrod9981 In some areas, yes. I agree, but Poland used to extend to L'viv, Ukraine, so they also have a historical stake in the country. I think Putin was making the point that Ukraine was not a separate country from Russia in culture, faith, or language for many decades, but now people are trying to break those ties. Correct me if I am wrong. One can't just rewrite boundaries and ties within countries. The British tried much of that, and new boundaries broke up clans, tribes, and people groups. The result is a mess. Outsiders can't solve these problems nor should they meddle in it. Imagine if Putin started telling Americans how to handle our border issues??!! Good grief, we would ban Russian vodka!!
Right at the beginning he specifically states he wishes to discuss historical context before he answers the question. Then Western people behave as if the historical context was the answer to the question, as if they had not heard him state that he would not yet be answering the question at this time, and as if they didn't make it far enough into the interview to get the answer. They are either stupid, or they are liars.
Very good interview and should change a lot of opinions about bad Russia . Russia wants to be accepted as a friend and efforts should be made to that end .
I am not sure Russia and America can be friends but I do believe we should respect each other. Many agreements have been made with Russia and not honored. That does not build trust in a relationship.
I don't understand why you Europeans elect our leaders. Which in turn they don't care about your life. What they can do is use the media to brainwash you. And they cheered, you guys worked hard to pay your taxes. They (EU leaders) also serve and obey their American bosses. Not your country or your life itself. I'm in Vietnam and I've heard Mr. Putin say things in interviews for 2 years now. Why are you surprised and now you know 😂. It's sad that your leaders talk about freedom and democracy all day long. To deceive you 😢
As far as I know, only USA that always accuses other countries as their enemies (or other things that USA have done themselves) and attacks them either through military actions or sanction or both; whereas other countries just want to work together with USA and be treated as equal at least.
In fact, we Russians were surprised that Putin started with the History of Russia, we did not expect this, but there is one remark: Before the interview, the list of questions was not specified, so Putin began with what he considered necessary, our President communicated with Tucker as a friend to whom he wanted to give a little history lesson, but it was made for a foreign audience. We in Russia know our history, we are taught this lesson at school, so at first we were bored😁. But this is our president, he is a patriot and loves his country very much. The second hour of the interview was much more interesting. But in Russia, we would like Tucker to ask more pointed questions about what the Biden administration is doing in Ukraine. But Tucker probably shouldn't have been asked the awkward questions that have to do with the American government. Therefore, what happened was what happened. And Putin was careful in his answers; as a former KGB officer, he knows a lot about presenting information to a journalist. If we were talking about Black Rock and the pharmaceutical companies that America created in Ukraine, it would be a global scandal! Putin also understood that Tucker would be in danger, so everything went within the limits of what was permitted. He kept Tucker safe. Tucker flew from Moscow to Belgrade, and from there flew to America. We are grateful to Tucker for his courage. I hope he will come to Russia more than once. But already as a tourist.❤️🇷🇺
1:33 That's wrong Putin is not living in the kremlin it's his work place. he lives in Novoogarevo(i'd say like in hour from the kremlin(by car)). and a few roads closing to let president in and out the city. it's common i have seen it few times
I appreciate the reaction and break down! Especially for an interview that could be perceived as having a historical political impact. Your professional opinions and thoughts are super interesting!
Tucker wisely avoided going into a ditch by overly trying to hurry Putin up. His occasional use of humor was important, and he also avoided overusing it; as well as not trying to dominate the conversation. Putin will make a deal with Trump (assuming his re-election) to stop this terrible war. There can be a settlement and probably Putin's further territorial ambitions will end there. But what a terrible human toll there has been. As in the Palestine attacks, the savage side of our species has again shown itself.
Putin did not start this war in ukrain the only terrorist attack has been by ukrain. Do your home work before making a fool of youself. I like to deal with proven facts not BS.
Putin told us what he wants us to think Putin believes rather than saying what would sell best. He wasn’t going for winning westerners over to be neutral or even pro-Russia
The translation is not correct: You did it (explosion on the "Nord Stream") in the Russian language there are 2 meanings of YOU, this is a respectful address to the elder or 2 variant of the plural address. They translated it as You to the elder, BUT Putin spoke as a plural, talking about America as a state. It turned out to be a good joke, but the context is not correct.
In an interview, Putin spends half an hour giving a history lesson. Meanwhile, Biden takes the same time just to recall the flavor of ice cream he had.
посмотрите выступление Путина в Мюнхене 10 февраля 2007 года (February 10th 2007 at 43rd Munich Security Conference) если бы присутствующие там прислушались к его словам сегодня был бы совсем другой мир! Путин Наш Президент 💪!!! на западе часто говорят что он тиран 😂😂😂 я вам скажу так я лучше буду жить в такой "тирании" чем в вашей "демократии". Россия вперед!!!! с Нами правда! с Нами Бог!!!
A point which struck me about this interview is that Vladimir Putin very often paused to think, before answering Tucker Carlson's questions. This is a good conversational style, I think, for serious conversations. So often, in my own social milieu, all participants feel they have to respond as fast as possible. This is often thoughtless and the response is misguided. Another point - once or twice I think, Putin asked for clarification of Tucker's questions. Again, I must comment that in my environment, one person says something, and the other feels impelled to disagree, before they have really understood the question. Again it is misguided, and not productive of harmony. I ask, which is the better, the more intelligent conversational style?
I thank you for pointing that out! However Vladimir Putin does speak English, and I assume understands it; so, your comment may be only part of the reason for the pauses before relpying.
@@robertmiller9345Путин отлично говорит по-немецки. По-английски, как сам говорит наш президент, он может "немножко объясниться". Здесь мы видим серьезное интервью ("не ток-шоу ";)), в котором не должно быть места даже нечаянному недопониманию. Поэтому работают только профессионалы.
Thank you again. I assume you are writing from Russia. Can you tell me where? I live in Masterton New Zealand. I did visit Russia on three occasions - November 1991, January 1994, and in the summer of 2006. @@Alikot1
Us "Russians" heard these stories a million times and I listened to this interview without the interpretation and while Tucker was asking questions to get an understanding or to achieve a certain goal, to Russians he seemed like an uneducated person who didn't understand anything Putin was saying because several times Putin says: "As i said earlier" or "again...". But as a post-soviet living in the US I understand that "stupid" question isn't always stupid and asked due to innocence, there's always an agenda, but Russians don't realize that. Putin himself didn't realize that, his tone wasn't interpeted by the interpreter obviously when you could hear him sigh and say things like: "once again..."
@@talktochrismiller you're welcome. Putin isn't as smart as the West thinks he is. Them Russians shoot things straight without agendas. There's a saying Russians are walnuts and Americans are cherries. Walnut seems tough on the outside but with a 100 grams of vodka you're super sweet and share everything about your life but Americans are like cherries because they seem all "smiley" and soft and kind on the outside but deep inside they are paranoid and tough people who don't trust anyone but themselves lol
There are several points I would like to comment on which as a native Russian find were misinterpreted or misunderstood: 1) Kremlin- it is NOT Putin's house, he does not live in Kremlin. Even his office is in different building which is a part of big complex inside of the Kremlin walls. That particular venue is separate too, the building is for official meetings, receptions and other formal events including interviews..... Putin lives outside of Moscow and he gets driven to Kremlin every morning. 2) History- Putin deliberately took long time in historical introduction just to prove to the Russian audience that US/ Europe don't care about their complex millennial history and where the roots of the current conflict are. 3) Abstract? Russian soul is not an abstract.... All Russian literature is about Russian soul, about spiritual struggles, finding the meanings of life, morality, complex relationship with God and people..... philosophy! Putin even ended the interview with the words on the soul which made Carlson very unforgettable and speechless. 4) When Putin refers Carlson to his opponents find out their answers from them - it is called decency in normal world. In Russian culture it would be considered as gossip and it is frowned upon. Especially at such high level. He said that during the interview several times that it would be incorrect to reveal someone else's thoughts spoken out loud during their conversations behind the closed doors. He can only takes responsibility for his own words, he will never take the responsibility for what the other person said.... At the official level - it is a skill of high diplomacy and that is why Russian diplomacy outsmarts the US/ Western in many debates.
Something I also want to point out; is that both of these man had an earpiece in and where relying on a translator. This causes some delay and make a conversation significantly harder to guide & follow, than if you both speak the (native) language.
I found the conversation to be extremely enlightening. Putins message was actually concise and simple when perceived at a macro position; “The US wouldnt let the past be the past. They wanted an enemy for their agents to work against. The US violated international law byway of violating the NATO and USSR agreement with 1. Government coo’s, 2. Forces at the Russia border nation (Ukraine), 3. Allowing buffer nations to join NATO. And then put sanctions on Russia. So Russia invaded with a forced hand. Btw nobody knows who’s running the US government.” - Putin. Also, if above is true.. the US government is lying and propagating lies to the American populace.
Putin apparently said you (plural) and the translator didn't make it clear by saying something like "you guys". I think Putin was laughing when he realised the translation led to a funny misunderstanding.
Very interesting observations and well worth watching. Putin is apparently very interested in history so it’s not surprising that it came up in the interview. What’s most obvious from the interview is that Putin is very cognitive, intelligent and politically astute. He’s obviously very much on top the issues currently before him and is very comfortable dealing with questions Tucker put to him. All of this is very different from the Western government/media impressions we get.
I was thinking the exact same thing watching this interview, East versus west culture was completely on display. But I wasn’t seeing it that positive for the west.
I think when Putin does not tell when the other person said this is actually very good. If he puts the orher person in a position where they have to come out and flat out deny it it does 2 things 1) increases the temperature. You cant easily in future agree a deal with someone who is on record that you claim is a lie 2) he avoids having to imply motives he cant know 3) putin cant be called a liar. If the talk is private nobody can prove either way so Putin will always be called a liar
I really loved the 2 hemispheres analogy. I honestly been thinking about the world working like a human brain for a long time now and hearing Putin bring this analogy up just left me speechless.
Another thing i think is a potential excellent tactic is this not saying what the other person said and saying go ask them 1) it means Putin cannot be accused of lying about that person 2) if that actually happens and someone DOES go ask them a dialog has innadvertantly been opened by proxy and dialog is what he wants
Great dissection and video. Thanks for the upload. subscribed Please do more dissections videos on World Leader’s Interviews. eg Benjamin Netanyahu, Rishi Sunak, Joe Biden etc
Такер Карлсон много сделал для американского народа.Он открыл мост между двумя народами.Столько положительных комментариев об этом диалоге от жителей Америки!Нам надо понимать друг друга! Наш президент показал как хорошо знает историю своей страны и любит Россию.Думаю, что много думающих и анализирующих американцев знают историю своей страны.Нам есть о чём поделиться.Но в этих отношениях не должно быть место "плохим мыслям" друг о друге.
Tucker did not do as much homework/prepwork for this interview. He did not really appear to have much knowledge about the events leading up to the present day based on his questions. Putin gives annual reports/interviews in which he responds questions. These last 2 to 3 hours.
Tucker does know this. Putin, however, didn't speak to Tucker, through him Putin spoke to the Western commoner audience, who are brainwashed and has no clue. And this is the reason Western "elites" were so pissed and scared by this interview, as they knew, Tucker will not edit it to make Putin look any different, then he appeared in this interview IRL.
In an interview with Russian citizens, Putin answers various questions for 4-5 hours every year in December! For him, 2 hours with one person is an easy walk.
And he always says what he wants home or not, he is known for that maxho attitude. But Tucker listened to him, Tucker represent free media, so he didn’t had to be rough, and he is always trying to be chary and to look friendly. Megyn Kelly interview with him was whole another story, he was very rough, jet very polite informally, she said they talked about family, there even a video where he said like we would not be abole to make a point, why confusedly said why? He answered we would be mesmerized by your beauty. He has a swag and jokes 😅
@@dallasstudent1605 I see that as the combination of personal and diplomatic ethics. Karin Kneissl, a former Foreign Minister of Austria, in her interview to BBC, when asked what Putin was as a person, said: "Putin is the most intelligent and accomplished gentleman - and focus here on "gentleman, and I've seen a few - I've ever met".
Mr. Chris Miller вы проделали хорошую работу! Спасибо! Я не эксперт по коммуникациям, но мне откликнулось всё то, о чём вы нам рассказали. Посмотрела всё на одном дыхании. Хотелось бы продолжения) Ещё меня заинтересовала тема с 7:45 по 9:05 о том, как наша культура влияет на наше общение.
Putin has actually made most of these pronouncements on a site called “Russian News”. I get on it 5 days a week and it features Putin, Lavrov and Zaharova.
9:07 Sharing a story mid conversation is such a Slavic thing to do. We just love to enrich the conversation (answer) with a story because there's no better way to deliver it. It was funny to see Tucker all confused in that part of the interview :)
Answering the question: Who blew up Nord Stream? Vladimir Putin says: "Вы.." This was translated: "You for sure" but it is incorrect. This should have been translated as: "You guys" Meaning you Americans and then smiled :)
When they exchanged about North Steam pipeline, Putin mentioned that Carlson could have joined CIA at one moment in the past. It wouldn't be suprising considering the affiliation of his father with this agency. What do you thing of Carlson reaction?
I thought his reaction was interesting - especially since there were several moments of what seemed to be genuine merriment. It'd be cool to hear Tucker's reaction to that comment - I know he's posted a reaction video so I need to check it out.
Putin is intelligent, confident, knowledgeable, and experienced. No matter how many less flattering adjectives may apply, he's a formidable opponent in any endeavor, including interviews. When it comes to Russian history, he definitely made selections in what to tell, how to tell it, and how to frame it. However, knowing a bit about Russian history, I spotted no lies; historians can always find something to fight about, but, in this case, they'd have to reach pretty far to claim that he doesn't have foundation for his claims. Of the rest of what he said, much is impossible to verity. No doubt, Putin is well aware of that, and may have taken the opportunity to lie. Certainly, all he said that's opinion, rather than fact, or is unverifiable, should be critically reviewed, before _maybe_ accepted. It's a fairly good sign that he started out truthfully, though, and, true or not, knowing what he wants us to think is informative, in itself. In a more confrontational interview, we would've learned less about that, and instead more about the journalist. Very few journalists are interesting enough to even begin to justify that. Tucker Carlson did as good a job as anyone could be expected to; any journalist thinking they could've confronted and intimidated Putin, and gotten anything out of him that he didn't want to share, must be on some pretty strong drugs.
I just have one question. Was it possible for a Russian journalist to come to the White House and ask Biden whatever he wants for two hours?? NO, of course. "No" should mean a lot to any normal thinking person.
I studied missions and cross cultural communications in college many years ago and later worked in a foreign country for several years. Most Other cultures don't communicate in the same way that Americans do. I could clearly see some of the differences when they had their interview. Overall I felt that it was informative and interesting. It seemed that Putin was more in control, although I believe they both did a great job. I feel that the interview was helpful to many.
It would have been good if you could have given us an opinion as to how sincere and truthful you thought Putin was throughout the interview. Particularly regarding some of the controversial statements he made. I would say Putin showed a complete lack of avoidance, hubris and cliche nonsense that we get from Western leaders when talking about sensitive issues.
You know how Putin commented the interview and Carlson? "He is a dangerous men" - about Carlson, because he is unpredictible. Putin was expecting a standart western unprofessional talk show - when journalists are trying to talk themselves all the time, attack, blame. And Putin said he prepered for that, but in the end it was " a nice " talk, what impressed him.
Oh finally: you will notice when he wont divulge what the other persom said its always a long topic and could become all about that person. However when it is a simple no context or framing required answer he DOES tell you what that person said. Like when he talks about asking bush to join NATO. That andwer doesnt require input and framing so he can explain he said basically yes i dont see why not
First analysis where they analyzer didn't say that this should have been an in your face type if dialog. The left mesia should look at with an honest approach and jlnot loaded with their bias and agenda.
When he was a kid he traveled, dude he literally aaid he drove a car 😂😂😂 In Europe you need to be 18 yo drove a car lol You didn’t even listing. And in early 80s Putin was over 30
I personally thing the 30 seconds or one minute thing was a mistranslation. I think it was supposed to be 30 minutes too one hour, but I don't speak Russian not can I really hear Putin so I'm only speculating.
What should I react to next? Drop your suggestions in the comments!
I would love to see your take on the presidential debates!!! They seem so silly and would love to see a professionals take
Do you think the interview would have been better had Tucker and Putin had a team of people who were working on content? To be sure Putin had no what his audience wanted to hear.
British author and political commentator Douglas Murray interviews Israel's Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu on TalkTV: ruclips.net/video/F57xdV_mIsA/видео.html
How about a commentary re: British author and political commentator Douglas Murray interviews Israel's Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu
Do Biden😅
In an interview with Russian citizens, Putin answers various questions for 4-5 hours every year in December! For him, 2 hours with one person is an easy walk.
I saw that in a previous comment and I'd like to check one of those out. It emphasizes how unique this conversation was because of their different styles.
@@talktochrismillerRT has the one of the most extensive archives available to watch speeches and interviews from Putin over the years that can be viewed in one spot. Just thought I'd throw it out there in case it's something that might help save time looking for sources.
😂
Putin doesn't living in Kremlin! Admistration work in this big building. He lives at different area out of Moscow. He is working there and completely administrative
@@talktochrismiller Putin is used to answer unseen questions without notes, teleprompter or an aide whispering in his ear. He knows history, understands economics and does not use euphemisms, but says directly what he wants to say. No spinning a bottle around. All qualities of a true statesman. No wonder his approval rate is steadily about 80%. Our western leaders can only dream about such numbers.
Putin said, "Is this going to be a talk show or a serious discussion?" (Well 30 seconds did becond nearly 30 mjnutes but...) War is a serious issues and the geopolitical, historical complexities need to be understood. Western corporate media provides zero insights into these complexities. Personally, as an American (tax paying/funder of war) I feel the urgency to get educated.
absolutely - I thought this was an super interesting mix of the two - chasing soundbytes vs understanding.
Professors John Mearshiemer and Jeffrey Sachs will have fully grasped Resident Putin's 30 minutes introduction, and insight, others, such as Hillary Rodham Clinton, Victoria Nuland, and those with a shorter attention span, like President Joseph Robin Biden Jnr, less so, but Tucker Carlson a professional journalist and interviewer, was able to absorb the interlude, and the anecdotes skillfully, with ease, making this meeting informative, and brilliant, well done to both men present 💯%👍🏻.
@@aneurindavies5943 You go to the colonnie for the 'resident' Putin.
Did you seriously believe that the US education system would cover Russia's History? How is that, given that it does not even cover US History?
great assessment - @@aneurindavies5943
Either way a bridge has been created . This interview will open up a lot of eyes and minds and hopefully lead open mindedness and peace . Brave Tucker for doing this for a greater cause . Bravo Putin brilliant as ever . Mature analysis, great .
my thoughts! thank you for watching.
Just like Trump said before , why not open a dialogue between Russia and the western world? For too long, USA has been holding Russia as enemy of the states, why? Politicians, Republicans or Democrats, are alway acting so righteous and noble by attacking Putin without truly understand their own motive or trying to please the misinformed publics.
Мы благодарны Такеру за то, что он дал возможность сказать нашему президенту то, что он хотел.
Мы в России понимаем,что это интервью было не для нас, потому что мы знаем все, о чем говорит Путин: и нашу историю, и наши намерения, и отношение запада к нам.
Это было послание западному зрителю.
И очень хочется верить, что нашего президента услышали те, к кому он обращался.
Мы за мир, всегда были за мир, и будем за мир, кто бы что ни говорил.
@@Alikot1 Translation:
We are grateful to Tucker for having given the opportunity to our president to say what he wanted to say.
We in Russia understand that this interview was not for us, because we know what Putin was talking about: Our history, our aims, and the relations of the West towards us.
This was a message to Western people.
We really want to believe that our president is heard by the people he addressed.
We are for peace, we have always been for peace, and we will be for peace, regardless what other people say.
@@gegebenein.gaussprozess7539спасибо, братишка ❤
Putin started the interview by taking his watch off. That is a major signal that Putin was sitting down to have a long talk without rush. He was giving his time to Tucker but will also not be pressed to respond to his questions.
this is a great point and I'm glad that a few have mentioned it. That nonverbal gesture goes a long way.
@@talktochrismiller also , Putin wears his watch on his right hand because (i dont have proof of this) it annoys him to wear it on his left hand.
@@bukefalbarca5769yeah, I remember he actually said it somewhere.
Chris Miller is critical. of Putin because he is intending to criticize Puttin because he is trying to make false propaganda perhaps defending U.S. and Nato the evil empires Chris be more honest and tell the true instead of prospect devils in the world and warmongers.
In fact, his message with that non-verbal gesture could mean: I'm not in a hurry, time works for me. Do you want to come to an agreement or will the wheel of time run over you.
the president was very impressive...his answer to every issue that tucker chucked at him was eloquently articulated. to me it was epic interview and riveting. the truth was delivered convincingly with confidence without enforcing body language that would help convince the public ...
Interview wasn't shaky. this exactly what Putin planned and was really smart - first 20-25 he explained the history since most American's have no clue and the fundamental infomtaion on why this conflict is happening.
thought this was a big part of the interview and while it may have taken awhile it did lay a groundwork that let other discussion take place.
Exactly .
@@talktochrismilleryes and those discussions need to be focused on the Rothschild international bankers, the core of the worlds problems.
@talktochrismiller I understand why Putin launched into a passionate monologue. The Englishman and the Russian set their heavy cast-iron buttocks on what should later become their development area. The Russians who marched across Eurasia to reach Alaska and Northern California and the Brits who got into every terrestrial hole wanted to know everything about the place they had colonized and were about to explore. The Americans in their outbound activities, on the contrary, pursue a butterfly policy leaping from Nicaragua to Somali and Ukraine and paying no attention to specifics of indigenous environment
But most won't listen it, it will be boring for them.
Russians are in general a historically aware and interested people.
Putin is a historically minded Russian.
The historical start to this excellent and worthwhile interview did not surprise me!
The nation of serfs and slaves largely does as it's told and buys into centuries of lies about its imperial history.
They are, but unfortunately they're fed the wrong history. Of course all countries tend to tweak history somewhat to favour themselves, but Russia takes this to an extreme.
@@istvanglock7445He didn't tell a lie. So what's the problem?
I see US media feed lies to their public on a daily basis changing events which happened in my life time, but russians are the one rewriting history? Bfr
@@istvanglock7445 and an example would be? Im wondering as Russian myself
Lol being histricly aware and using history as propaganda tool is not the same thing. Quite the opposite actually
Putin was in the KGB. He is smart he has a law degree. He is a martial artist. He knows exactly how to manage a conversation. Even if the interview happened in the United States Putin would still be sitting the same way and be relaxed.
can't wait to see if there will ever be a convo like this in the U.S.
Keep in mind Dr.Putin has a PhD in economics with a focus on planning for the mineral economy. It’s no surprise the Russian Empire outmaneuvered the harshest sanctions in history. Hell sanctions even backfired onto Europe and is crushing the EU’s economies
@@talktochrismiller sadly i don't think there will be, hopefully though.
Putin have degree in economy also.
Putin King of the World 😎 and Biden is Parkinson daddy 😂
For once, this was an adult conversation destined to reach a world of teenagers.
Not sure what that means…do you mean in plain enough language for a young person to understand? That doesn’t mean the political hacks aren’t working at ways to imprint their muddle on it. Thank you, Tucker, for a mature effort to establish some understanding. God help us all.
@@SSoF-07y08zhe’s saying essentially that the discussion was very much needed and was a mature interview but it reached a immature crowd of people.
This wasn't a conversation, nor was it intended to be. It was intended to be, or at least it was sold as, an interview. But it turned out to be a monologue.
@@istvanglock7445 you’re complaining about Putin taking 20 mins to explain his countries history? I think it was very important to do that since most Americans know nothing about Russia other than what they’ve been fed by the media as far as questions go he asked good questions that were a mix of easy and hard for example the question about Putin trying to get rid of Nazism in Ukraine and Tucker asking how he will do that if he doesn’t even control Ukraine. Another one was why he attacked Ukraine. It’s really important to get the “enemies” perspective rather than just hating them for no reason
@@riyoszu
I wasn't complaining about anything, just stating facts. Read what I said. Russian history is not a secret, so there's no good reason for most Americans not to acquaint themselves with it, just as there's no reason for Putin not to do the same.
You seem to have not been paying much attention over the last 2 years. There was nothing new in this monologue - Putin has been trying to justify this invasion for that length of time. The good thing was that Putin confirmed that his primary reason for invading Ukraine was in taking the first step toward recreating the Russian Empire.
You think people hate Russia for no reason? Where in God's name have you been since Feb 2022? The totally unjustified invasion of a sovereign nation, followed by the Bucha and other atrocities, the rapes, the murders, the deliberate targeting of civilians. Russia has truly shown the world what it is. Many knew what it was already. But too many Americans still don't have a clue.
That ridiculous comment about Nazism reveals you to be a Russian troll. Even the most stupid Americans don't buy into that nonsense.
The smug, sophomoric presumptions of American Exceptionalism meets age-old, historic and pragmatic reality. This conversation illustrates the difference between historical realities and pragmatic wisdom compared to nationalistic propaganda and hegemonic arrogance. The fact that so few Americans were NOT intentionally privileged with this dialogue speaks volumes about American intentionality.
I haven't read a sentence like that since grad school. Thanks for watching!
This sentence alone has increased my level of English 🤣 brilliantly said
Good analysis, thank you. Only, your last statement that both Carlson and Putin are doing things to push closer to addressing the topic using whatever means including manipulation, is a very western perspective. Actually I would say Putin was being extremely neutral and direct but that itself required detail - so his conversational style was unfamiliar to me, as a westerner, mostly because he *avoided* rhetoric, and wanted to provide substance and meaning. Carlson in turn should be praised for giving Putin the chance to actually express ideas, which as far as I can find no other western journalist has ever done, period.
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
"The smug, sophomoric presumptions of American Exceptionalism meets age-old, historic and pragmatic reality." Compare that to reception Elon Musk experienced while procuring rockets from Russia in 2001. The "Pragmatic reality" is delusional, controlling of the masses, and stifling of the Entrepreneur (i.e. American Exceptionalism). Musk succeeded despite the naysayers and haters. That is also American Exceptionalism for in Russia, he would have been in jail just like Yukos founder, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, and under a permanent
unjustified Red Notice like Bill Browder still remains under.
Excellent analysis of what turned out to be a surprisingly important interview for those wanting to understand the thinking of this fascinating world leader.
thanks for watching!!
A western audience wants some bullet points or a "listicle" as they don't have the attention span to digest a long history lesson about complex geopolitical events.
bingo - collision of culture in practice.
I think this is the assumption of what they want because this is what has intentionally been offered by the mainstream media to achieve the desired outcomes of those in power. It's been shown that there's a huge demand for the long form media especially when it comes to the news and current events. Long form media is well on its way to becoming the preferred option of getting information by the majority of the public.
Americans are bottom line people. We want others to get to the point. It is just our style. I think most of us in the USA wonder why we are even there and butting into a situation that really doesn't involve us. Same for Israel and Gaza. We have enough problems at home and should mind our own business. I think we make these situations worse overseas. Tucker's questions pop the propaganda balloon we hear at home about the intentions of Putin.
@@dallasstudent1605потому что вы не получили прибыли, вложив деньги в убийство славян.
Вы же сами ответили на свой вопрос.
and the origins of this story must be known, Putin was consistent and was able to convey the entire essence of the origins of the conflict
Putin visibly removed his wristwatch as the interview started too, maybe he planned to, maybe force of habit---but this really communicated that he was in for an intricate, serious, and thorough conversation
this is a super insightful observation. I hadn't realized that and it does speak volumes. thanks for sharing!
I don't wear watches, or bracelets or any other jewelry because my skin sweats and irritates under a bracelet, when I wear one. It causes discomfort for me, in short words. May be, Putin has similar problem, so he removed his watch so they wouldn't distract him during serious conversation.
Or, may be, he just took them off and put in front of him to control timing, so he wouldn't need to check them time from time, which could have been interpreted as eagerness, or irritation.
I don't understand why we are discussing Russia's ancient history? If Putin wants to start reclaiming historical territories, he should begin with himself and return the Russian Far East to China. Ukrainians don't need to prove their historical right to exist. They have their own culture, their own language, and the entire world, including Putin, has long recognized them. Why not focus on resolving issues rather than revisiting ancient history?
@@mariajones8304 судя по всему Вы пропустили историческую справку... Украина как государство появилось после 1991 года и на тот момент культура, язык, история и прочее на 90% - русские! То что происходит сейчас - насильственная украинизация из-за которой в том числе стал сопротивляться восток Украины. Представте картину, допустим мексиканцы в США из Техаса приходят к власти и говорят - все США мексиканцы, государственный язык во всем США - испанский, запрещено учить, смотреть СМИ, кино и т.д. , обращаться в госсударственные рганы, медицина и прочее - запрещены на английском, культура, история, обычаи - никогда не было США, все мексиканское... Всё наследие США уничтожается (памятники, история и т.д.) вместо них воздвигаются памятники героям, которые уничтожали в свое время американцев (это конечно сложно представить, так как америка не вела на своей территории внешних войн, но допустим)... север США поднимает мятеж против этого, мексиканцы объявляю ВСЕХ жителей севера террористами и посылает (против конституции) свою армию бомбить север США - вот что произошло на Украине простым языком - указ временно исполняющего обязанности президента Украины Турчинова от 14.04.2014г. (АТО - антитеррористическая операция), с этого и началась война на Украине - гражданская!!! Армия Украины пошла убивать население Украины на востоке (Донбасе)!!! И Минские соглашения - между властями Украины и представителями Донбаса, Россия не участник соглашений, а их гарант как и Германмя, Франция!
Еще раз - война на Украине началась 14.04.2014 года с Указа верховной власти Украины!!!
Путин снял часы, вербально показывая собеседнику, что он не ограничивается во времени беседы, это для того что бы собеседник был не напряжён...
Very interesting thank you for producing this and giving your insight. I just find it So disheartening that we have such talented and intelligent people like yourself in the United States but yet we allow the most evil, corrupt and selfish people to make decisions on our behalf. Given what’s happening lately maybe the tide is finally turning…
the internet is a crazy place - excited for the opportunity we have to connect.
I thougbht it was a great interview. The Anglo-saxon media was very dismissive and called it a major anti-climax for both concerned, I'm not so sure. Putin was clearly not the freak he has been depicted as. And I think a lot of people could relate to Carlson in this interview and can recount similar positions they have faced themselves. Overall I think he did a great job. And given its viewership, I can't see how this could be considered a failiure.
I thought it was a great conversation. Like you said - not every conversation has to be climatic. There is beauty in the mundane.
Putin's talking and facial expression in more genuine than other politicians we are familiar with... Thank you for going into detail about the interview - I just found your channel and already following you Mr. Miller - keep up your great work so more people can understand others more instead of leaning towards the hate campaign by the deep states.
thank you, my friend! Happy to have you here.
Yep. Especially when talking to Tucker about the "de-nazification" ... you could see this subject was still sensitive to Putin. Born in 1952, WWII had only been over for 7 years at that point.
I've watched a lot of videos after that interview.
This is a really great interview. For me, as a Russian person, it was very important that we were heard all over the world, in particular in English-speaking countries. Because many people have heard only one position on this issue. And if you haven't changed your mind, but at least listened, then this is a great victory on the path to peace.
I think it’s a great way for us to open up more communication! Thanks for watching.
Fun Fact about Russia: It was Russia who saved The Union during the American Civil War as they sent their Navy to San Francisco and New York when England and France were just about to enter the war on the side of the Confederates since London created the Confederates. France was already in Mexico making a spear head movement to resupply the Confederates and to open up a Pacific Theatre and to create a port in California. England already amassed 11,000 troops and growing stationed at their Northern Confederacies border now called Canada ready to open a Northern Theatre to divert Union troops away from their Southern Confederacy then to attack The Unions naval blockade. The Union would have been completely destroyed and annexed by those two great powers leaving the Confederates to exist as either a puppet state of London or to be fully brought back into the fold of the British Empire.
London was already courting (threatening/bribing) other countries to get involved like Spain while Russia was in talks with Prussia to ally with incase London was to intervene.
Seeing all of this Tsar Alexander II wrote a letter to Queen Victoria saying “If you enter in this war it will be a casus belli for all out war with the Russian Empire”. The stage was set for the 1st World War and Russia stopped it.
There is also a memorial in San Francisco for the
hundreds of Russian sailors who came off their Asiatic fleet ships that died while helping the city put out a fire that threatened to lay waste to it during the War.
The Russian fleet also threatened to Shell Australian ports along with other British Pacific Colonies if Britain aided the Confederates. A confederate war ship spent a lot of time in Australian waters and was supported by the Australian public, some even signing on as crew members. This Confederate war ship laid waist to the US Pacific whaling fleet and is reported to have fired the last shot in the war. The name of the ship was called the CSS Shenandoah. Its surrender was at Liverpool England where Confederate Commander Bulloch was stationed
Russia also helped Thailand (Kingdom of Siam) maintain its sovereignty from being completely Partitioned/Annexed from the British and French around the same time. The very word Thai (ไทย) means 'free man' in the Thai language which is partially to thank to the Russians as they might have ended up being a colony or part of another country/colony if not for their intervention.
About question of Nord Stream, Putin knew Tucker was rejected from CIA application when he was young, so he become journalist....and made some kind of joke...#You did it?
Exactly - Tucker laughed at it but you could tell that he was surprised.
Learn about how many "journalists" worldwide are actually members of the c...
Who do you think defined the "news" we are supposed to hear, read or see?
I am surprised to discover so many naive people in our civilised west...
I would think at this point that Tucker gets on his knees and Thanks God he was rejected from the CIA.
Не совсем так.
В русском языке местоимение: "Вы" имеет два значения: 1. Единственное число этого местоимения - это уважительное обращение к собеседнику, например: Это сделали Вы, Такер!, и 2. Множественное число - это обращение к нескольким людям, например: Это сделали вы, граждане США.
Путин говорит ""вы" во множественном числе, имея в виду США, потому что он достаточно воспитан, чтобы не вешать всех собак на Карлсона.
Но в переводе получается игра слов, в которой реакция Такера бесценна))
Наша благодарность этому смелому и честному журналисту.
No. It's complete BS. If it's true that Tucker's father is CIA and his son wanted to serve they would have found a job for him. No, the CIA did not reject Tucker- he " rejected " them.
In all analyzes of the interview, it was noted how long Putin's introduction was and how far back in time he went. No one from the US side humbly asked where the usa were in 862 when they already had their own history and country? The life of the usa began in 1779 with the genocide of the local population. Decisions and implementation of what is good and what is not in the world were appropriated by the USA with the argument of force and weapons. And that in a society of cultures where, in fact, no one allowed usa to speak at all, let alone judge. The only freedom usa have in this historical context is to humbly keep quiet, listen and learn. Especially because it is so painfully evident that everything that has been done on the world stage by the usa in the last 150 years has been a big (primarily moral) failure with far-reaching consequences for everyone. Deep retrospection and a large dose of humility are urgently needed. This is actually the wisely hidden and gentlemanly message of Putin's long introduction.
Americans are a young nation. Very young. This is evident from the actions. Russian philosophers, analysts and political scientists say that sometimes Americans resemble spoiled children in their behavior in the world. The American identity is 250 years old. This is the age of the Bolshoi Theatre in Moscow. It's a Russian joke.
The US is too young for Americans to appreciate history
Да, ребята, без обид, но в России только балету больше лет, чем вашей стране))
This conversation is the closest I've seen Tucker Carlson get to a logical, dialectical dialogue in his efforts to disclose the truth to his viewers, to the American people, about everything that Russia is, means, and stands for in addition to being the biggest country in the world.
Excellent analysis, Chris! Your insights on cultural differences, storytelling, and communication style made this fascinating to watch. Would love to see more of these insights from you in future videos. Putin comes across as the seasoned storyteller with Carlson, who seems too gobsmacked or starstruck to probe deeper. I get the impression he was learning about some of these historic events for the first time, which put him at a disadvantage.
thank you for watching, Janna! great comments and I wonder how a part 2 would be different than the first.
Don't let Tucker fool you he will be what he needs to be in order to get the audience to absorb as much information as possible. It's especially true here when many people were watching Putin be interviewed for the first time in their lives. Tucker is very well versed on the topic of Russia and its history but he is doing this for an audience who is not informed. He is playing the role of his audience who has been subjectively sheltered from being informed as well as outright lied to by the government on the subject of Russia. Most media is edited and polished before being shown to the public and it's quite obvious this was untouched and raw footage which is a credit to Tucker imho.
Tucker and Putin both share a love of history. Putin mentioned that in the beginning. I don't think the history lesson was for Tucker. If you listen to military men they often go over the history of a country. Listen to Col. McGregor talk. He goes into depth about history in his responses. Bush Jr. understood Russia more because Condi Rice was an expert on Russia. She spoke the language. Nuland who was in Obama's admin had family on her father's side from Bessarabia which was a part of Russia at one point. I don't think Putin has anyone in his admin that came from America and now works with him. At least now Putin has someone like Tucker to give him air time. I think what happened is very important. America and Russia should at least respect each other. Both cultures have good and bad to them like all cultures do.
The history of Russia has more than 1000 years, and this is only what is confirmed by documents, the originals of which are in Russia. Putin told the story very briefly, just to understand the ties between Russia and Ukraine. In Russian schools, all children study history in more detail, with dates, photos of documents, names, events, background, analysis of what happened. History has been studied in schools for several years without fail. This is called education.
Interesantna i inteligentna analiza! Čestitam!
thank you for watching!!
История за 30 секунд - это сарказм. Невозможно рассказать историю России за такое короткое время, но это всё равно была максимально сокращенная версия.😂 И тут больше не про Россию, сколько про Украину и почему он считает её искусственно созданной страной.
Всем мира
peace to you! Thanks for watching
And your point ends when your country decide genocide people because you want land back!
To a Western audience the historical component would be almost meaningless as most westerners would have little understanding or a web/mindset to make sense of all the cultural, historical information unless they had specific knowledge or expertise in this area. Tucker despite his journalistic skills was at times baffled by the educational component of Putin's comprehensive account of the many relevant background factors. Those who have had a solid grounding in history particularly Russian/Ukrainian would not have not been surprised by anything Putin stated. There was nothing new here. Putin's goal during the initial part of the interview was simply to expound on ithe relevance of issues which are not generally known in the West. Putin covered the entire interview in an articulate,, civilised, coherent and lucid manner. There are few world leaders who are capable of demonstrating such a level of communication & statesmanship !
❤
Putin stated at the beginning that Tucker was fond of history like Putin is. Tucker had a college major in history? Didn't Putin say that? I don't think think the history lesson was for Tucker. Putin's history lesson was about a country that share a culture and faith which made them unified and successful. I think it was important to establish that Ukraine has many cultures/languages attached to it including Russian and that Russian connection goes way back. I believe Russia had a President from Kiev and another from the Donbass area. Someone correct me if I am wrong. There really isn't any Ukraine culture so why is Zelensky now denying the contributions of Russians living there? Why are we not hearing the close relationship Russians have had with Ukraine? Ukraine also has a rich history of Orthodox Christianity. The story Putin told was about a Town that has one of the oldest churches there. I think this is why Putin has not flattened Ukraine. Ukraine and Russia relationship seems a bit similar to USA and Canada relationship or India and Nepal. If Western forces had not gotten involved I think the Russians and Ukranians would have resolved this by now. Putin seems to want to make Russia Great Again. What is wrong with that? That is his job as their leader. Both Tucker Carlson and Putin are subjects of misinformation and character assassination. They have that in common even thought they are from different countries. Some have said this is reminiscent of the The Kennedy-Khruschev Exchanges. Carlson may be paving the way for Trump to have diplomatic dialog with Russia in the future. I vote for diplomatic dialog over nuclear war!!
Correction: not “connection” to Russia, but being One same country
@@elibrod9981 In some areas, yes. I agree, but Poland used to extend to L'viv, Ukraine, so they also have a historical stake in the country. I think Putin was making the point that Ukraine was not a separate country from Russia in culture, faith, or language for many decades, but now people are trying to break those ties. Correct me if I am wrong. One can't just rewrite boundaries and ties within countries. The British tried much of that, and new boundaries broke up clans, tribes, and people groups. The result is a mess. Outsiders can't solve these problems nor should they meddle in it. Imagine if Putin started telling Americans how to handle our border issues??!! Good grief, we would ban Russian vodka!!
Right at the beginning he specifically states he wishes to discuss historical context before he answers the question. Then Western people behave as if the historical context was the answer to the question, as if they had not heard him state that he would not yet be answering the question at this time, and as if they didn't make it far enough into the interview to get the answer. They are either stupid, or they are liars.
Very good interview and should change a lot of opinions about bad Russia . Russia wants to be accepted as a friend and efforts should be made to that end .
I am not sure Russia and America can be friends but I do believe we should respect each other. Many agreements have been made with Russia and not honored. That does not build trust in a relationship.
What agreements ? I am not aware of any .
I don't understand why you Europeans elect our leaders. Which in turn they don't care about your life. What they can do is use the media to brainwash you. And they cheered, you guys worked hard to pay your taxes. They (EU leaders) also serve and obey their American bosses. Not your country or your life itself. I'm in Vietnam and I've heard Mr. Putin say things in interviews for 2 years now. Why are you surprised and now you know 😂. It's sad that your leaders talk about freedom and democracy all day long. To deceive you 😢
As far as I know, only USA that always accuses other countries as their enemies (or other things that USA have done themselves) and attacks them either through military actions or sanction or both; whereas other countries just want to work together with USA and be treated as equal at least.
Your right
In fact, we Russians were surprised that Putin started with the History of Russia, we did not expect this, but there is one remark: Before the interview, the list of questions was not specified, so Putin began with what he considered necessary, our President communicated with Tucker as a friend to whom he wanted to give a little history lesson, but it was made for a foreign audience. We in Russia know our history, we are taught this lesson at school, so at first we were bored😁. But this is our president, he is a patriot and loves his country very much. The second hour of the interview was much more interesting. But in Russia, we would like Tucker to ask more pointed questions about what the Biden administration is doing in Ukraine. But Tucker probably shouldn't have been asked the awkward questions that have to do with the American government. Therefore, what happened was what happened. And Putin was careful in his answers; as a former KGB officer, he knows a lot about presenting information to a journalist. If we were talking about Black Rock and the pharmaceutical companies that America created in Ukraine, it would be a global scandal! Putin also understood that Tucker would be in danger, so everything went within the limits of what was permitted. He kept Tucker safe. Tucker flew from Moscow to Belgrade, and from there flew to America. We are grateful to Tucker for his courage. I hope he will come to Russia more than once. But already as a tourist.❤️🇷🇺
1:33 That's wrong Putin is not living in the kremlin it's his work place. he lives in Novoogarevo(i'd say like in hour from the kremlin(by car)). and a few roads closing to let president in and out the city. it's common i have seen it few times
thanks for providing this clarification! much shorter of a commute than Tucker, but you're right.
@@talktochrismillerit’s funny, but for me to fly to Moscow from my city is actually faster than the commute from Moscow airports to the Red Square 😂
Tucker Carlson is a best Journalist in world, we American love his talk show and God Bless Tucker Carlson!!!👈👍❤👈
I appreciate the reaction and break down! Especially for an interview that could be perceived as having a historical political impact. Your professional opinions and thoughts are super interesting!
Awh - thank you!! that means a lot - appreciate you watching!
No, it's not gonna have any impact whatsoever. Not with people like Nudelman running this trainwreck.
Tucker wisely avoided going into a ditch by overly trying to hurry Putin up. His occasional use of humor was important, and he also avoided overusing it; as well as not trying to dominate the conversation. Putin will make a deal with Trump (assuming his re-election) to stop this terrible war. There can be a settlement and probably Putin's further territorial ambitions will end there. But what a terrible human toll there has been. As in the Palestine attacks, the savage side of our species has again shown itself.
Putin take of his wristwatch at the begining of interview , signaling to Tucker , I have time as much you need ( hours).
Putin did not start this war in ukrain the only terrorist attack has been by ukrain.
Do your home work before making a fool of youself.
I like to deal with proven facts not BS.
Was Putin genuine or not? What do you think? I think he was genuine.
I believe that he was.
@@talktochrismiller❤❤❤
❤
Putin told us what he wants us to think Putin believes rather than saying what would sell best. He wasn’t going for winning westerners over to be neutral or even pro-Russia
yes 100%
We should ask Tucker to do a 2 hour interview with president of the US 😅
i would love to make a video about that!!
Respect to Carlson for courage and hope he stays safe 🙏🏻
The translation is not correct: You did it (explosion on the "Nord Stream") in the Russian language there are 2 meanings of YOU, this is a respectful address to the elder or 2 variant of the plural address. They translated it as You to the elder, BUT Putin spoke as a plural, talking about America as a state. It turned out to be a good joke, but the context is not correct.
In an interview, Putin spends half an hour giving a history lesson. Meanwhile, Biden takes the same time just to recall the flavor of ice cream he had.
LOL!! Good one.
посмотрите выступление Путина в Мюнхене 10 февраля 2007 года (February 10th 2007 at 43rd Munich Security Conference) если бы присутствующие там прислушались к его словам сегодня был бы совсем другой мир! Путин Наш Президент 💪!!! на западе часто говорят что он тиран 😂😂😂 я вам скажу так я лучше буду жить в такой "тирании" чем в вашей "демократии". Россия вперед!!!! с Нами правда! с Нами Бог!!!
Wow this was really interesting. Thank you!
thank you for watching!!
Карлсон смелый и честный ❤. Путин умный . Он патриот. Желает мира на земле. ❤
thanks for watching! ❤️
A point which struck me about this interview is that Vladimir Putin very often paused to think, before answering Tucker Carlson's questions. This is a good conversational style, I think, for serious conversations. So often, in my own social milieu, all participants feel they have to respond as fast as possible. This is often thoughtless and the response is misguided. Another point - once or twice I think, Putin asked for clarification of Tucker's questions. Again, I must comment that in my environment, one person says something, and the other feels impelled to disagree, before they have really understood the question. Again it is misguided, and not productive of harmony. I ask, which is the better, the more intelligent conversational style?
Love your assessment of the communication tactic!!
Путин, прежде чем ответить, выслушивал перевод вопроса Такера с английского на русский. Этим и вызваны задержки с ответами.
I thank you for pointing that out! However Vladimir Putin does speak English, and I assume understands it; so, your comment may be only part of the reason for the pauses before relpying.
@@robertmiller9345Путин отлично говорит по-немецки. По-английски, как сам говорит наш президент, он может "немножко объясниться".
Здесь мы видим серьезное интервью ("не ток-шоу ";)), в котором не должно быть места даже нечаянному недопониманию.
Поэтому работают только профессионалы.
Thank you again. I assume you are writing from Russia. Can you tell me where? I live in Masterton New Zealand. I did visit Russia on three occasions - November 1991, January 1994, and in the summer of 2006. @@Alikot1
Us "Russians" heard these stories a million times and I listened to this interview without the interpretation and while Tucker was asking questions to get an understanding or to achieve a certain goal, to Russians he seemed like an uneducated person who didn't understand anything Putin was saying because several times Putin says: "As i said earlier" or "again...". But as a post-soviet living in the US I understand that "stupid" question isn't always stupid and asked due to innocence, there's always an agenda, but Russians don't realize that. Putin himself didn't realize that, his tone wasn't interpeted by the interpreter obviously when you could hear him sigh and say things like: "once again..."
Super interesting perspective, thanks for sharing.
@@talktochrismiller you're welcome. Putin isn't as smart as the West thinks he is. Them Russians shoot things straight without agendas. There's a saying Russians are walnuts and Americans are cherries. Walnut seems tough on the outside but with a 100 grams of vodka you're super sweet and share everything about your life but Americans are like cherries because they seem all "smiley" and soft and kind on the outside but deep inside they are paranoid and tough people who don't trust anyone but themselves lol
There are several points I would like to comment on which as a native Russian find were misinterpreted or misunderstood:
1) Kremlin- it is NOT Putin's house, he does not live in Kremlin. Even his office is in different building which is a part of big complex inside of the Kremlin walls. That particular venue is separate too, the building is for official meetings, receptions and other formal events including interviews..... Putin lives outside of Moscow and he gets driven to Kremlin every morning.
2) History- Putin deliberately took long time in historical introduction just to prove to the Russian audience that US/ Europe don't care about their complex millennial history and where the roots of the current conflict are.
3) Abstract? Russian soul is not an abstract.... All Russian literature is about Russian soul, about spiritual struggles, finding the meanings of life, morality, complex relationship with God and people..... philosophy! Putin even ended the interview with the words on the soul which made Carlson very unforgettable and speechless.
4) When Putin refers Carlson to his opponents find out their answers from them - it is called decency in normal world. In Russian culture it would be considered as gossip and it is frowned upon. Especially at such high level. He said that during the interview several times that it would be incorrect to reveal someone else's thoughts spoken out loud during their conversations behind the closed doors. He can only takes responsibility for his own words, he will never take the responsibility for what the other person said.... At the official level - it is a skill of high diplomacy and that is why Russian diplomacy outsmarts the US/ Western in many debates.
thanks for sharing this!
Boris Johnson. Mentioned name that explained the essence. There is no (western) media that pointed it as an important "action". Sad.
Something I also want to point out; is that both of these man had an earpiece in and where relying on a translator.
This causes some delay and make a conversation significantly harder to guide & follow, than if you both speak the (native) language.
this is a great point. It's like a zoom call with bad connection. With this in mind - it's pretty impressive the convo they still were able to have.
Wow I love the way depth you broke it down with. It's a gift to be able to do that.b
thank you for watching and commenting!
Awesome breakdown of the conversation (as expected from you)! I loved your analysis from a rhetorical and interpersonal perspective.
thank you, RC! This was a super fun one and I'm glad you enjoyed it!
I found the conversation to be extremely enlightening. Putins message was actually concise and simple when perceived at a macro position; “The US wouldnt let the past be the past. They wanted an enemy for their agents to work against. The US violated international law byway of violating the NATO and USSR agreement with 1. Government coo’s, 2. Forces at the Russia border nation (Ukraine), 3. Allowing buffer nations to join NATO. And then put sanctions on Russia. So Russia invaded with a forced hand. Btw nobody knows who’s running the US government.” - Putin.
Also, if above is true.. the US government is lying and propagating lies to the American populace.
Loved this video
thank you!
Putin apparently said you (plural) and the translator didn't make it clear by saying something like "you guys". I think Putin was laughing when he realised the translation led to a funny misunderstanding.
Great topic for your channel Chris. Hopefully this is a boost for your channel that was needed. It's only up from here.
Yes! glad you're here.
Well done !! Thank you.
you bet - thanks for watching!
If all interviews would go back to 'source / through history' the world would be a much better place.
Very interesting observations and well worth watching. Putin is apparently very interested in history so it’s not surprising that it came up in the interview. What’s most obvious from the interview is that Putin is very cognitive, intelligent and politically astute. He’s obviously very much on top the issues currently before him and is very comfortable dealing with questions Tucker put to him. All of this is very different from the Western government/media impressions we get.
Thanks for watching! I agree with your assessment
All the media who flame on Tucker should take class on communication from you
Excellent! Thank you.
Of course! Thanks for watching.
I was thinking the exact same thing watching this interview, East versus west culture was completely on display. But I wasn’t seeing it that positive for the west.
Bravo young man!
Thank you!
I think when Putin does not tell when the other person said this is actually very good. If he puts the orher person in a position where they have to come out and flat out deny it it does 2 things 1) increases the temperature. You cant easily in future agree a deal with someone who is on record that you claim is a lie 2) he avoids having to imply motives he cant know 3) putin cant be called a liar. If the talk is private nobody can prove either way so Putin will always be called a liar
good point! Thanks for watching!
Please note that the President answered all of the respected Tucker’s questions.
This time I'm already convinced that he's really smart
Мне понравился Ваш разбор интервью. Привет из России, Санкт-Петербург. Комментарий в продвижение Вашего канала.
Спасибо за просмотр. Привет из США
I really loved the 2 hemispheres analogy. I honestly been thinking about the world working like a human brain for a long time now and hearing Putin bring this analogy up just left me speechless.
Another thing i think is a potential excellent tactic is this not saying what the other person said and saying go ask them 1) it means Putin cannot be accused of lying about that person 2) if that actually happens and someone DOES go ask them a dialog has innadvertantly been opened by proxy and dialog is what he wants
I think Putin is just very strict not telling what people said in a conversation where they had agreed it to be confidencial.
I like this a lot. Just analyzing the conversation itself objectively without judging it at all. Like everyone else.
Thank you! That’s my goal.
You are the first I have seen acknowledge the cultural differences in communication.
I think it plays a major part in interviews like this and we’d be remiss to not acknowledge it. Glad you watched!
Hell yeah. Killer content, I like these kind of videos
heck yeah! I'll be bringing more this weekend. Glad to have you here.
Started to look like Tucker was the therapist letting the patient vent. Btw, I love Tucker and I support Russia too.
Great dissection and video. Thanks for the upload. subscribed
Please do more dissections videos on World Leader’s Interviews. eg Benjamin Netanyahu, Rishi Sunak, Joe Biden etc
copy that - will do. Thanks for the sub. Shoot me over specific talks or meetings that you have in mind.
There’s an interview of Netanyahu with lex Friedman.
Такер Карлсон много сделал для американского народа.Он открыл мост между двумя народами.Столько положительных комментариев об этом диалоге от жителей Америки!Нам надо понимать друг друга! Наш президент показал как хорошо знает историю своей страны и любит Россию.Думаю, что много думающих и анализирующих американцев знают историю своей страны.Нам есть о чём поделиться.Но в этих отношениях не должно быть место "плохим мыслям" друг о друге.
Thoughtfully said! Thank you for watching.
Tucker did not do as much homework/prepwork for this interview. He did not really appear to have much knowledge about the events leading up to the present day based on his questions.
Putin gives annual reports/interviews in which he responds questions. These last 2 to 3 hours.
that's interesting - so Putin is used to media taking several hours
Это лож! Они длятся по 4-5 часов и отвечает всей стране гражданам это правда😂 Для него 2 часа с одним человеком это легкая прогулка 😂❤❤❤
Tucker does know this. Putin, however, didn't speak to Tucker, through him Putin spoke to the Western commoner audience, who are brainwashed and has no clue. And this is the reason Western "elites" were so pissed and scared by this interview, as they knew, Tucker will not edit it to make Putin look any different, then he appeared in this interview IRL.
In an interview with Russian citizens, Putin answers various questions for 4-5 hours every year in December! For him, 2 hours with one person is an easy walk.
Я даже удивился что всего 2 часа, так мало
Through stories, God told us the past, present and future to the end!
Facts!
Very objective account of the actual interview itself. Great piece. My greatest salutations !!
Thank you for watching!
Correction, the year 862 is the 9th century (not the 8th century as Carlson suggests).
And he always says what he wants home or not, he is known for that maxho attitude. But Tucker listened to him, Tucker represent free media, so he didn’t had to be rough, and he is always trying to be chary and to look friendly. Megyn Kelly interview with him was whole another story, he was very rough, jet very polite informally, she said they talked about family, there even a video where he said like we would not be abole to make a point, why confusedly said why? He answered we would be mesmerized by your beauty. He has a swag and jokes 😅
Feels like Putin wanted to get a lot of his chest. Like he was long waiting for someone to listen to his side. I do appreciate the history 😀
but honestly...if english man says in a minute means in fact half an hour + so I don't see any problem there, in couple seconds means up to 10 minutes
hahah true, “be there in a minute”
as we’re leaving the house
This was interesting 👍
thanks for watching! ❤️
Confidentiality between private persons and in a media driven diplomatic setting cannot be measured by a private convo confidentiality metric.
If Putin has told what the American side said they would have called him a liar. He was wise in not stating what Americans have said.
@@dallasstudent1605 I see that as the combination of personal and diplomatic ethics. Karin Kneissl, a former Foreign Minister of Austria, in her interview to BBC, when asked what Putin was as a person, said: "Putin is the most intelligent and accomplished gentleman - and focus here on "gentleman, and I've seen a few - I've ever met".
Mr. Chris Miller вы проделали хорошую работу! Спасибо! Я не эксперт по коммуникациям, но мне откликнулось всё то, о чём вы нам рассказали. Посмотрела всё на одном дыхании. Хотелось бы продолжения) Ещё меня заинтересовала тема с 7:45 по 9:05 о том, как наша культура влияет на наше общение.
Thank you for this feedback! I’m glad you watched.
Putin has actually made most of these pronouncements on a site called “Russian News”. I get on it 5 days a week and it features Putin, Lavrov and Zaharova.
9:07 Sharing a story mid conversation is such a Slavic thing to do. We just love to enrich the conversation (answer) with a story because there's no better way to deliver it. It was funny to see Tucker all confused in that part of the interview :)
Putin is very much like Peter Falk as Inspector Columbo. Funny.
Answering the question: Who blew up Nord Stream? Vladimir Putin says: "Вы.." This was translated: "You for sure" but it is incorrect. This should have been translated as: "You guys" Meaning you Americans and then smiled :)
oh wow! the smile after that say a lot.
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 nice video
thank you, Jimmy!
When they exchanged about North Steam pipeline, Putin mentioned that Carlson could have joined CIA at one moment in the past. It wouldn't be suprising considering the affiliation of his father with this agency.
What do you thing of Carlson reaction?
I thought his reaction was interesting - especially since there were several moments of what seemed to be genuine merriment. It'd be cool to hear Tucker's reaction to that comment - I know he's posted a reaction video so I need to check it out.
Tucker already knew the answer, Putin just confirmed it for him. ( BTW, Many Americans also awared of this fact as Tucker )
Putin is intelligent, confident, knowledgeable, and experienced. No matter how many less flattering adjectives may apply, he's a formidable opponent in any endeavor, including interviews. When it comes to Russian history, he definitely made selections in what to tell, how to tell it, and how to frame it. However, knowing a bit about Russian history, I spotted no lies; historians can always find something to fight about, but, in this case, they'd have to reach pretty far to claim that he doesn't have foundation for his claims. Of the rest of what he said, much is impossible to verity. No doubt, Putin is well aware of that, and may have taken the opportunity to lie. Certainly, all he said that's opinion, rather than fact, or is unverifiable, should be critically reviewed, before _maybe_ accepted. It's a fairly good sign that he started out truthfully, though, and, true or not, knowing what he wants us to think is informative, in itself. In a more confrontational interview, we would've learned less about that, and instead more about the journalist. Very few journalists are interesting enough to even begin to justify that. Tucker Carlson did as good a job as anyone could be expected to; any journalist thinking they could've confronted and intimidated Putin, and gotten anything out of him that he didn't want to share, must be on some pretty strong drugs.
I just have one question.
Was it possible for a Russian journalist to come to the White House and ask Biden whatever he wants for two hours??
NO, of course.
"No" should mean a lot to any normal thinking person.
I studied missions and cross cultural communications in college many years ago and later worked in a foreign country for several years. Most Other cultures don't communicate in the same way that Americans do. I could clearly see some of the differences when they had their interview. Overall I felt that it was informative and interesting. It seemed that Putin was more in control, although I believe they both did a great job. I feel that the interview was helpful to many.
Love this insight! I imagine you’ve seen some cool conversations. Thanks for sharing.
It would have been good if you could have given us an opinion as to how sincere and truthful you thought Putin was throughout the interview. Particularly regarding some of the controversial statements he made. I would say Putin showed a complete lack of avoidance, hubris and cliche nonsense that we get from Western leaders when talking about sensitive issues.
You know how Putin commented the interview and Carlson?
"He is a dangerous men" - about Carlson, because he is unpredictible. Putin was expecting a standart western unprofessional talk show - when journalists are trying to talk themselves all the time, attack, blame.
And Putin said he prepered for that, but in the end it was " a nice " talk, what impressed him.
Oh finally: you will notice when he wont divulge what the other persom said its always a long topic and could become all about that person. However when it is a simple no context or framing required answer he DOES tell you what that person said. Like when he talks about asking bush to join NATO. That andwer doesnt require input and framing so he can explain he said basically yes i dont see why not
First analysis where they analyzer didn't say that this should have been an in your face type if dialog. The left mesia should look at with an honest approach and jlnot loaded with their bias and agenda.
very cool to know - I know there are a lot of analyses out there
When he was a kid he traveled, dude he literally aaid he drove a car 😂😂😂 In Europe you need to be 18 yo drove a car lol You didn’t even listing. And in early 80s Putin was over 30
Putin demonstrated superiority of russian mind over weastern. Taker sad he needs 1 year to understand what Putin sad.
I think is Respect to speak sharp for seriously questions and Putin said that he have no right to speak in details and Putin is right for all!
- why say 20 seconds, when Putin said 30 seconds to a minute?
- Tucker agreed - his bad :)
Luôn luôn ủng hộ tổng thống putin và Nước Nga vĩ đại. Viva Russia viva putin 🇷🇺❤👍
I personally thing the 30 seconds or one minute thing was a mistranslation. I think it was supposed to be 30 minutes too one hour, but I don't speak Russian not can I really hear Putin so I'm only speculating.
For someone who understands russian and saw original Putin speech its sad how much talking points missing in the translation.
He literally sad just that, translation was precise.
He didnt mean it literally. In Russia people say "5 seconds" when they ask someone to wait.