When writing the limit as an integral, I noticed that 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑥² − 1 _almost_ works, so I guessed that it was really 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑘𝑥² − 1 for some constant 𝑘. Plugging that into the Riemann sum I found that 𝑘 = 4 works, and that gave me the boundaries 𝑎 = 1 ∕ 2 and 𝑏 = 5 ∕ 2. So my integral became ∫[1 ∕ 2, 5 ∕ 2] (4𝑥² − 1)𝑑𝑥, which also happens to evaluate to 56 ∕ 3. Great video by the way!
@@ahmet-23-1 Yes, of course. Just like Prime Newtons did in the video I figured that 𝛥𝑥 = 2 ∕ 𝑛, which turns the Riemann sum into lim 𝑛→∞ ∑[𝑖 = 1, 𝑛] 2 ∕ 𝑛 ⋅𝑓(𝑎 + 𝑖⋅2 ∕ 𝑛) I then assumed 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑘𝑥² − 1 ⇒ 𝑓(𝑎 + 𝑖⋅2 ∕ 𝑛) = 𝑘(𝑎 + 𝑖⋅2 ∕ 𝑛)² − 1 Plugging that into the Riemann sum, I got lim 𝑛→∞ ∑[𝑖 = 1, 𝑛] 2 ∕ 𝑛⋅(𝑘(𝑎 + 𝑖⋅2 ∕ 𝑛)² − 1), which I then simplified to lim 𝑛→∞ ∑[𝑖 = 1, 𝑛] 2 ∕ 𝑛⋅((𝑎√𝑘 + 𝑖⋅2√𝑘 ∕ 𝑛)² − 1) By comparing this to lim 𝑛→∞ ∑[𝑖 = 1, 𝑛] 𝑛 ∕ 2⋅((1 + 𝑖⋅4 ∕ 𝑛)² − 1) I realized that I needed to set 2√𝑘 = 4, which gave me 𝑘 = 4 and 𝑎√𝑘 = 1, which gave me 𝑎 = 1 ∕ √𝑘 = 1 ∕ 2.
Dear Sir ,I really appreciated the way you have articulated it. Things have become easily comprehandable for me with full of clarity.I resolved these problems myself in my note pad with full of confidence having watched this video. Thanks a lot and keep on enlightening the viewers like us.
Great explanation. Appreciate that you expanded the problem to include finding and evaluating the integral. This allowed us to gain more insight into the meaning of the terms. Brilliant!
... Good day Newton, When I watch a presentation of this topic, the problem for me is not to be able to follow it properly, but to possibly reproduce it! In short I don't find this subject difficult, but it still is difficult to give the whole material a firm place in my head, isn't it crazy?! A subject that I therefore have to repeat regularly, to be able to explain it to other interested students over and over again! Newton, thank you for another clear presentation on Riemann, and I will also recommend it to other students having some problems regarding this topic; great work! Take care, Jan-W
The integeral that I have reach to is 1/2 integeral of x^2-1 from 1 to 5 Which give the same value of 56/3 This can be reach be letting delta x = 4/n and a=1and b=5
I am confused by how he got 2n^3+3n^2+n when he expanded n(n+1)(n+1), because it looks like it should be n(n^2+2n+1) => n^3+2n^2+n, could someone explain please?
haha 8:45 "lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vivamus auctor id justor eu ultrices" means customer service with a basketball coach.
When writing the limit as an integral, I noticed that 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑥² − 1 _almost_ works, so I guessed that it was really 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑘𝑥² − 1 for some constant 𝑘.
Plugging that into the Riemann sum I found that 𝑘 = 4 works, and that gave me the boundaries 𝑎 = 1 ∕ 2 and 𝑏 = 5 ∕ 2.
So my integral became ∫[1 ∕ 2, 5 ∕ 2] (4𝑥² − 1)𝑑𝑥, which also happens to evaluate to 56 ∕ 3.
Great video by the way!
How do you get to type these fancy math expressions in comments?
@@PrimeNewtons If you're using MacOS, just open the Edit menu and choose "Emojis and Symbols".
hey, can you explain how did you do this part "Plugging that into the Riemann sum "
@@ahmet-23-1 Yes, of course.
Just like Prime Newtons did in the video I figured that 𝛥𝑥 = 2 ∕ 𝑛,
which turns the Riemann sum into
lim 𝑛→∞ ∑[𝑖 = 1, 𝑛] 2 ∕ 𝑛 ⋅𝑓(𝑎 + 𝑖⋅2 ∕ 𝑛)
I then assumed 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑘𝑥² − 1 ⇒ 𝑓(𝑎 + 𝑖⋅2 ∕ 𝑛) = 𝑘(𝑎 + 𝑖⋅2 ∕ 𝑛)² − 1
Plugging that into the Riemann sum, I got
lim 𝑛→∞ ∑[𝑖 = 1, 𝑛] 2 ∕ 𝑛⋅(𝑘(𝑎 + 𝑖⋅2 ∕ 𝑛)² − 1),
which I then simplified to
lim 𝑛→∞ ∑[𝑖 = 1, 𝑛] 2 ∕ 𝑛⋅((𝑎√𝑘 + 𝑖⋅2√𝑘 ∕ 𝑛)² − 1)
By comparing this to lim 𝑛→∞ ∑[𝑖 = 1, 𝑛] 𝑛 ∕ 2⋅((1 + 𝑖⋅4 ∕ 𝑛)² − 1)
I realized that I needed to set 2√𝑘 = 4, which gave me 𝑘 = 4
and 𝑎√𝑘 = 1, which gave me 𝑎 = 1 ∕ √𝑘 = 1 ∕ 2.
Dear Sir ,I really appreciated the way you have articulated it. Things have become easily comprehandable for me with full of clarity.I resolved these problems myself in my note pad with full of confidence having watched this video. Thanks a lot and keep on enlightening the viewers like us.
Great explanation. Appreciate that you expanded the problem to include finding and evaluating the integral. This allowed us to gain more insight into the meaning of the terms. Brilliant!
Bro you deserve a lot more than this! Keep going on!
... Good day Newton, When I watch a presentation of this topic, the problem for me is not to be able to follow it properly, but to possibly reproduce it! In short I don't find this subject difficult, but it still is difficult to give the whole material a firm place in my head, isn't it crazy?! A subject that I therefore have to repeat regularly, to be able to explain it to other interested students over and over again! Newton, thank you for another clear presentation on Riemann, and I will also recommend it to other students having some problems regarding this topic; great work! Take care, Jan-W
Hello Jan-W. I fixed it. I noticed it as soon as it was published. I appreciate your attention to detail. Have a wonderful day. I hope for the same.
@@PrimeNewtons ... No problem Newton, we're here to help each other! Jan-W
Me being kind in every video I watch.
The integeral that I have reach to is
1/2 integeral of x^2-1 from 1 to 5
Which give the same value of 56/3
This can be reach be letting delta x = 4/n and a=1and b=5
Awesome explanation... Seems quite doable
Excellent explanation. Thanks. I look forward to watching more of your videos.
awesome video mate
great explanation
great explanation!! 😊
Great video sir....❤
Excelente!!
Happy New year :)
Nice to watch your video today
Awesome video 😊🎉
mucho gracias
perfect
thxxx
Lim = 2 * Integral ((1 + 4x) ** 2 dx) (from 0 to 1) - 2.
greatttt
so good explanation
Excellent
I am confused by how he got 2n^3+3n^2+n when he expanded n(n+1)(n+1), because it looks like it should be n(n^2+2n+1) => n^3+2n^2+n, could someone explain please?
Hey man, it's because we have n(n+1)(2n+1), and not n(n+1)(n+1)
Oh ok, thank you, I didn’t see the 2n part
Advanced stuff. Hope I can follow it.
How many hats do you have, man ?
I just counted. 23
beautiful
thank you sire
For this part I would use Oh notation rather than write out the full fraction.
haha 8:45 "lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vivamus auctor id justor eu ultrices" means customer service with a basketball coach.
When I saw this I kept treating i like it was the imaginary unit, so I thought it would involve a contour integral!
😁
♥