You know, these cases of best friends suing each other, especially for trivial things is just sooo sad. Case # 2: The plaintiff ruined friendship of what was clearly an accident. What the case only proves is how petty and selfish she is. I hope the defendant finds a better friend.
@@conkeycruisers7203 considering that I don’t know you, I wasn’t talking to you. The judge said that the school did the same the as the doctor, which is not true
I think the mom in the first case should've gone after the parents of the kid who bit her son instead of the school. Otherwise I'm pretty sure she would've won her case.
@ninadavis5517 That is what probably caused his injury to get worse. I'm surprised that Judge Mabeline missed that. That standard of care is so outdated!!!
It the 1st case...The plaintiff will learn EVENTUALLY all that the judge told her...Children learn emotional intelligence through stuff happening... The 2nd case...Plaintiff is delusional...Entitled much...
@@MedOKCBecause it's not like she can actually sue the child who injured HER child because he's way too young, so the parents are responsible. If you get bitten by a dog who'd gotten loose due to irresponsible owners, would you sue the dog itself or would you instead go after the owners of it?
You know, these cases of best friends suing each other, especially for trivial things is just sooo sad. Case # 2: The plaintiff ruined friendship of what was clearly an accident. What the case only proves is how petty and selfish she is. I hope the defendant finds a better friend.
“A learned fool is more a fool than an ignorant fool.”
― Moliere
This quote in my mind sums up the second case. The plaintiff is a lousy friend.
Sue the child's parents for damages.
So I guess we should all sue the schools when children get into fights at school too. The first plaintiff is delusional.
Applying antibiotic ointment is not the same as going to a doctor and being prescribed an oral antibiotic. 🤦🏼♀️
I'm fully aware of how oral versus topical antibiotics works. That practice is outdated.
@@conkeycruisers7203 considering that I don’t know you, I wasn’t talking to you. The judge said that the school did the same the as the doctor, which is not true
I think the mom in the first case should've gone after the parents of the kid who bit her son instead of the school. Otherwise I'm pretty sure she would've won her case.
1,200$ for a f****** cell phone that was silly
School should not apply antibiotic ointment.
The nurse did
@ninadavis5517 That is what probably caused his injury to get worse. I'm surprised that Judge Mabeline missed that. That standard of care is so outdated!!!
Sue the mom
The second case is juvenile!
Who doesn't get insurance on their phone?!
Yeah, especially a $1,200 phone at that!
It the 1st case...The plaintiff will learn EVENTUALLY all that the judge told her...Children learn emotional intelligence through stuff happening...
The 2nd case...Plaintiff is delusional...Entitled much...
Second case is pathetic.
I have no idea why some of these Judges take certain cases. The 2nd case was such a waste of time...smh
The network choose the cases...Not the judge...
The plaintiff is barking up the wrong tree, she should sue the biter's parents.
And WHY might that be????????????? Of course, as they say, ANYONE can sue . . .WINNING is quite another.
@@MedOKCBecause it's not like she can actually sue the child who injured HER child because he's way too young, so the parents are responsible.
If you get bitten by a dog who'd gotten loose due to irresponsible owners, would you sue the dog itself or would you instead go after the owners of it?