French Open 2024 Finals - Alcaraz one step from career slam, Swiatek sweeps to fourth Roland Garros

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 37

  • @chriskneebone8044
    @chriskneebone8044 5 месяцев назад +6

    What a French Open!

  • @God1stForever
    @God1stForever 5 месяцев назад +6

    Your show is very much appreciated

  • @Adiz9809
    @Adiz9809 5 месяцев назад +3

    ‏re: players who won their first three Grand Slam finals - it is worth mentioning that on Saturday afternoon Iga Swiatek has won her 5th Grand Slam title - in her 5th Grand Slam final (she is the first player to win 5/5 GS finals since the great Roger Federer, who got to 7/7 before losing to Rafa at the French Open in 2006)
    Also, a shout-out to her rival in the match of the tournament - and comeback player of the year candidate - Naomi Osaka, who has won her first 4 Grand Slam finals... more to come soon?

  • @graemenoeldeans
    @graemenoeldeans 5 месяцев назад +4

    IGA won 26 of 41 points from 5 2 down she won 63% of points in last 5 games so

  • @leithbouacida2483
    @leithbouacida2483 5 месяцев назад +1

    Amazing episode!

  • @jukkao.parviainen8669
    @jukkao.parviainen8669 5 месяцев назад +3

    Not to forget that Rybakina choked to Paolini, so for sure Ryba vs. Iga would been more a popcorner match! These are things out of Iga’s hands, literally, how other players perform.

  • @tennisbonus
    @tennisbonus 5 месяцев назад +1

    loved this episode. thanks for the great coverage TW

  • @andieolivia
    @andieolivia 5 месяцев назад +1

    De Jong played very well in qualies. I was not surprised when he took a set of Carlos. That test early on proved to be very good for him.

    • @tennisweeklypodcast
      @tennisweeklypodcast  5 месяцев назад

      It really did. Where do you De Jong will finish the season?

  • @roger1346798520
    @roger1346798520 5 месяцев назад +1

    Re: on players winning their first 3 grand slam finals, it’s easy to forget that Federer won his first 7 from 2003 to 2006 until losing the 2006 French against Rafa. Also his compatriot Stan Wawrinka won all 3 of his finals as well. Some nostalgic Swiss excellence there ~~

  • @kasiaxx-k9x
    @kasiaxx-k9x 5 месяцев назад +4

    Nadal dominated Roland Garros for years and people were complaining? :)

  • @Drubujo
    @Drubujo 5 месяцев назад +1

    re: players who won their first three grand slam finals, I'm surprised none of you thought of the great Stan Wawrinka! He beat the world no. 1 in all three of them as well.

  • @GaryTornado-zy2mz
    @GaryTornado-zy2mz 5 месяцев назад +8

    Swiatek wins 4th French and 5th Major but sure leaving Paris with the knowledge that the match is still on the bigger hitting opponents racquets on faster/indooor surfaces that Osaka match has me excited for the rest of the season ❤

    • @Drubujo
      @Drubujo 5 месяцев назад +1

      Osaka still hasn't been back on the court for long so she can continue progressing as the season goes on as well. She could be in frightening form by the time we get to the North American hard courts.

    • @jukkao.parviainen8669
      @jukkao.parviainen8669 5 месяцев назад

      @@DrubujoIt was actually a final , unfortunate that they met on the second round!

    • @GaryTornado-zy2mz
      @GaryTornado-zy2mz 5 месяцев назад

      @@Drubujo That’s what I’m excited about. I feel like after that match and her gradual progress that by the time September rolls around Osaka will bring the heat. Peak Osaka is still the best hardcourt player in the game.

    • @OO-ts5ow
      @OO-ts5ow 5 месяцев назад

      LOL OSAKA IS OVERRATED. 11 tournaments played now. Compare to muchova, svitolina, bibi comeback. Laughable

  • @joshheinink
    @joshheinink 5 месяцев назад

    Alcaraz will get multiple slams per year

  • @maciekszymanski8340
    @maciekszymanski8340 5 месяцев назад +6

    Tennis is not about entertaining the audience, but about determining the winner.

    • @tennisweeklypodcast
      @tennisweeklypodcast  5 месяцев назад +2

      It's a big business and that business depends on people wanting to watch

    • @broncoguy4862
      @broncoguy4862 5 месяцев назад +1

      Tennis is about generating revenue like any business. If the fans aren't entertained, they won't watch. No fans = no advertisers = no revenue. Tennis, especially on the women's side, went through a period of self-reflection in the 90's in an effort to boost the fan experience...that's why Wimbledon now has on-court interviews, and tournaments add little moments like the winner of a match autographing balls before hitting them to the fans. It's often said that interest in the Williams sisters saved tennis for the US market.

    • @maciekszymanski8340
      @maciekszymanski8340 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@broncoguy4862Women wrestling is very entertaing. And it's made up and orchestrated to be even more funny yet it generates much less money than tennis. Guess why...

  • @marionsmith4728
    @marionsmith4728 5 месяцев назад +4

    I dont see you moaning when Serena was dominant,you can only beat the people in front of you,its up to the other player's to raise their game

    • @tennisweeklypodcast
      @tennisweeklypodcast  5 месяцев назад

      I don't think the podcast existed then!

    • @tennisbonus
      @tennisbonus 5 месяцев назад +2

      A lot of her finals were closer!

  • @graemenoeldeans
    @graemenoeldeans 5 месяцев назад

    grand slam surfaces most early champions played grass and clay before hard courts 3 of the 4 were grass so useless fact