Sniffer Dogs Trained To Catch Illegal Tobacco | Dog Detectives

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 41

  • @army7andqueenjisoo472
    @army7andqueenjisoo472 Год назад +4

    The most loving thing is the three of them love and trust each other a lot

  • @likeablesdaily
    @likeablesdaily 11 месяцев назад +1

    Theyre just too wiggly compare with usual K9s😂

    • @Demun1649
      @Demun1649 6 месяцев назад

      Britain doesn't use the Americanism of K9. We use the number 42. Guess why? And Springers are not wiggly, they are the most intelligent of dogs, and need constant stimulation. No other breed can be trained to carry out so many different tasks. What breed do you compare them to?

  • @tracker5849
    @tracker5849 Год назад

    What is illegal about cigarettes? I don't understand

    • @SHINeeKari
      @SHINeeKari Год назад +1

      From what I gather, these are cheaper, (somehow) more toxic/non-regulated and random substances tossed in with regular tobacco.

    • @powellpker
      @powellpker 6 месяцев назад +1

      They pretend they are doing it for the publics saftey and to stop " dangerous counterfit cigs".. But reality is the tax just hasn't been paid on them.. The tax man couldnt give a toss what the public is smoking aslong as they get paid off it, if they dont.. then its an issue.

  • @dianelopes8199
    @dianelopes8199 2 года назад +2

    wouldn't need these hard working dogs if the government didn't charge so much tax on tobacco, if lowed the tax more people would buy from shop

    • @Demun1649
      @Demun1649 Год назад +2

      And more would get lung cancer, and put the costs up on the NHS. And where does that money come from? Maybe, if you get cancer because you smoke, you should be forced to go private.

    • @powellpker
      @powellpker 6 месяцев назад

      @@Demun1649 Clearly have no clue how the economy works, if more people die on lung cancer that will save money in pensions, you think cancer care is the same as 30 years retirement hahaaa?

    • @Demun1649
      @Demun1649 6 месяцев назад

      @@powellpker I have more of a clue how the economy works. MCIS, ACCA, ACWA, ensures that.

    • @powellpker
      @powellpker 6 месяцев назад

      @@Demun1649 Then why do you think someone with cancer will take more money from the goverment than someone retiring at 65?

    • @Demun1649
      @Demun1649 6 месяцев назад

      @@powellpker Did you understand my post? I think not. I never referred to, nor compared, those two completely different scenarios. And NO ONE retires at 65 any more. Keep up.

  • @devilmyke
    @devilmyke 2 года назад +2

    Maybe the legal tobacco shouldn't be so unbelievably expensive

    • @NeapolitanApe
      @NeapolitanApe 2 года назад +4

      It stops people from smoking... Not completely, obviously. But it does reduce it. Who wants to smoke 2 packs a day if it costs $20 a day? That's like $7000 a year.

    • @devilmyke
      @devilmyke 2 года назад

      @@NeapolitanApe yea but just ban it then lol..And what about people like me that started to smoke back when it was heavily advertised but now im too addicted and have to pay £22 for 50g

    • @NeapolitanApe
      @NeapolitanApe 2 года назад +1

      @@devilmyke Prohibition doesn't work

    • @devilmyke
      @devilmyke 2 года назад

      @@NeapolitanApe its like cannabis aswell..if you artificially rise the price of somthing/Make it illegal it just opens up opportunities for people to sell it under the counter which can lead to buying other things under the counter/on the back street

    • @NeapolitanApe
      @NeapolitanApe 2 года назад +1

      @@devilmyke also the government needs the tax dollars... That's why they won't outright ban it

  • @Eristotl3
    @Eristotl3 2 года назад +2

    Da F is illegal tobacco?

    • @Demun1649
      @Demun1649 Год назад

      Ask your kids. They must be, MUST BE, brighter than you.

    • @Eristotl3
      @Eristotl3 Год назад

      @@Demun1649oh no some random person on the internet called me stupid.

    • @Demun1649
      @Demun1649 Год назад

      @@Eristotl3 No. Just someone hoping that only a moron would type an unintelligible question. Are you a Yenghi?