Ah, the classic 11x11 conundrum! It's like trying to find a matching sock in a laundry basket you know it's in there somewhere, but it's just playing hide and seek! If only math had a 'find my missing sock' app, we'd all be geniuses by now.
@@ElementAiden yeah, apparently someone in my town has one but I was unable to contact him. I will not buy my own because bigger ones have been announced
@@wowzers-sv2ym 1. Always start edges or center bars with something that already has a few pieces solved 2. use M slice for edges, especially for the bigger ones 3. do lots of solves to be comfortable with the different pieces types and turning quicker
When unboxing my new QiYi 11x11 I said that no one in the world has solved an 11x11 in under 10 minutes so I would have to use my laptop for timing, while editing I then found that somehow you had!
@@kidifu-cubes uwr for 8x8 is with yau. I don't really see the advantage, since eventually edges take only a small part of the solve, so it's better to optimize centers than edges
@@sickness.official not at all. First time I wanted a uwr was for 15x15 since I thought it was really attainable. And once you get uwr for one big cube, you kinda get them all
@@odl3144 one of the reasons is how much improvement there is. Sometimes I think I'm at my limit, but then I come back in a few months and get significantly better times. I found a lot of small optimizations that don't even exist on wca big cubes. And it's also fun to improve my piece recognition, since that's another thing to improve on
@@apcubes also, how do you deal with parity? Is there some resource you have with all the parity algorithms for all your big cubes? Or is there some way to intuitively solve parity(like megaminx corner PLL )
@@speedcubingdotorg hard to say, 11x11 is a nice middle ground since I can still turn fast but it also feels like a big cube. I bring a 9x9 with me a lot since it's convenient and doesnt take long. I practice other big cubes if I want to reach a goal or something. And of course, wca big cubes for competitions, which is not very frequent
Stackmatting 11x11 lmaooo
STACKMAT DUDE
Ah, the classic 11x11 conundrum! It's like trying to find a matching sock in a laundry basket you know it's in there somewhere, but it's just playing hide and seek! If only math had a 'find my missing sock' app, we'd all be geniuses by now.
Why not socks with the apple tag that can find your location thingy to locate the sock built in the sock
My 11 x 11 Rekord is 1:32. Also when will be posting again?
1 hour and 32 minutes
@@karz3733 probably not for a few months, busy with university
Oh
Even more impressive every time ! I didn’t even know sub-9 was possible for you lmao
He solves an 11x11 slower than my 7x7 pb
Congrats ap! This is amazing. I'm just happy to get sub-19
@@MrEFynn did you get it today?
@@apcubes Yes I did. 18:47.82
Ok. Pack it up. Ap is making UWR here. LFG
Dude u gotta try the zettaminx
@@ElementAiden yeah, apparently someone in my town has one but I was unable to contact him. I will not buy my own because bigger ones have been announced
Never look at the clock before oll and pll lol.
Great solve
can you make a tutorial on l2c and l4e? thanks
@@brokin_official alr
What would be your 3 main tips for solving big cubes fast? (Or just getting faster at them?)
@@wowzers-sv2ym 1. Always start edges or center bars with something that already has a few pieces solved
2. use M slice for edges, especially for the bigger ones
3. do lots of solves to be comfortable with the different pieces types and turning quicker
@@apcubes alright
Thank you!
When unboxing my new QiYi 11x11 I said that no one in the world has solved an 11x11 in under 10 minutes so I would have to use my laptop for timing, while editing I then found that somehow you had!
man to think that jus a few years back it took you two hours and some change 😔😔😔
Do you think yau could be useful for bigger cubes than 7x7? At least 8 or 9?
@@kidifu-cubes uwr for 8x8 is with yau. I don't really see the advantage, since eventually edges take only a small part of the solve, so it's better to optimize centers than edges
On 8x8 or 9x9 , edges take way less time than centres,a few edges solved isn't worth slow centers
What is your wca id?
When you were new to cubing, did you ever think you could hold so many UWR’s?
@@sickness.official not at all. First time I wanted a uwr was for 15x15 since I thought it was really attainable. And once you get uwr for one big cube, you kinda get them all
Insane
This is nearing my 9x9 pb and I'm scared lol
new ap vid
speedy 😱
what do you average on 7x7 ?
@@BIGDANNYMAPPING 2:30 I think
Damn how are u immune to pops :o
Will u make a tutorial?
@@NguyenCuber69 probably not anytime soon
What about very large cubes appeals to you?
I’m just wondering
@@odl3144 one of the reasons is how much improvement there is. Sometimes I think I'm at my limit, but then I come back in a few months and get significantly better times. I found a lot of small optimizations that don't even exist on wca big cubes. And it's also fun to improve my piece recognition, since that's another thing to improve on
@@apcubes 👍 keep it up!
@@apcubes also, how do you deal with parity? Is there some resource you have with all the parity algorithms for all your big cubes? Or is there some way to intuitively solve parity(like megaminx corner PLL )
Nice yo!
WHAT
It takes me 7 minutes to solve 7x7 and you're over here getting Sub10Min on an 11x11 lmao
I once solve a 7 by 7 in 12 minutes
I am guessing you are confident enough now that if the solve is over 10 minutes you just don't care about the time?
@@speedcubingdotorg last time I got above 10 minutes was several months ago, and I avg sub9 now
@@apcubes which big cubes do you practice most?
@@speedcubingdotorg hard to say, 11x11 is a nice middle ground since I can still turn fast but it also feels like a big cube. I bring a 9x9 with me a lot since it's convenient and doesnt take long. I practice other big cubes if I want to reach a goal or something. And of course, wca big cubes for competitions, which is not very frequent