Out of all the Monarchs Elizabeth I is my favorite. She was strong and ruled with her head not her heart. She knew the Tudor dynasty would end regardless rather with her or because of Marriage so she decided to be the virgin queen and never take a husband. That’s power and that made her a legacy.
You have to love the irony of the Tudor family. People loved Kathrine of Aragon but most hated her daughter Mary. People hated Anne but most loved Elizabeth The son that Henry had to have is barely remembered but yet the daughter he shunned the most is the hair that he needed. I think that the reason she was such a successful queen is because she learned from her brother and sister mistakes. The biggest difference between Mary Stuart and Elizabeth is Mary ruled with heart not her head she was a woman before she was a ruler. Elizabeth was a ruler first and she ruled with her head. I honestly think the reason she never married was because she saw how her father wives were treated and because she was sexually abused by Tomas Seymour
She also would not have wanted to share or give up that power. Elizabeth made sacrifices that Mary Stuart did not. You rightly said “ Mary ruled with her heart “first and Elizabeth with her head before her heart. Elizabeth also knew that naming a successor was like placing a target on your back because everyone runs after the heir.
the bigger irony is that Elizabeth wasn't this huge hater of Mary Stuart as people think she was. Mary was actually her favorite choice as heir and she would chose her in a heartbeat over literally everyone else who were claiming the throne.
Either way the Tudor dynasty would've ended with Elizabeth. I believe this is the reason Elizabeth never married or had children...doing both would've meant her giving up power. I don't really blame her decision.
They thing is, even if she would have birthed an heir, it would have ended the Tudor dynasty, as her husbands line would have become the dynastic name. Ex: Victoria was house of Hanover, but Edward VII was Saxe Coburg Gotha. Prince Philip, and lord Mountbatten, thought when Elizabeth II became queen the house name would change to Mountbatten. But, government stood up and made sure it stayed Windsor.
Very right. I'd like to add. Elizabeth I did the best thing for herself and her time. I understand the logic. She would hold her position well and then, like a loving mother, see that things may be as orderly as possible by the time she passes away, i.e. passing her crown to James of Scotland.
Queen Victoria was the only Queen to change the name. Queen Anne of Great Britain was still a Stuart even after marriage and had a son (who died of smallpox) but had he of lived and become King would it not still be the house of Stuart then? 🤔
Regarding the defeat of the Spanish Armada, one detail is very often overlooked and it's important because it provides a great deal of context for why it happened. While the galleon was the fastest ship of the time, the Spanish were not heading to English waters for a naval fight. Rather, they were on a mission to land on English soil with the goal of starting a land war. Two things worked marvelously in Elizabeth's favor. She had intelligence from Sir Francis Walsingham that her country was in danger of attack by the Spanish and therefore could prepare for it. And then the weather changed, miraculously, in favor of the English fleet and they were able to maneuver quickly and with more agility than the ill-equipped Armada, with Drake's command, and easily cause mass casualties along with what the weather had already done to the Spanish. Spain was completely unprepared to be caught off guard in the water before they'd made landfall. That's why the English were able to overtake them.
Also, Drake was quick-witted, courageous, and a bit wild but not very reckless (at least in comparison to others who served the Queen). He and the naval commanders used everything they had to their advantage and then kept engaging until they made the Spanish essentially think the English were half demon creatures of the sea, chasing them down WITH FIRE - to the continent and some to the mists of the Scottish Sea. One of the things that has made me admire Elizabeth and get advisors most is their intelligence operations and utilizing psychology (whether they realized it beyond "human nature" or not)
I've always admired and looked up to Queen Elizabeth 1st, starting when I saw Glenda Jackson play the part of the queen in the 1970's both when they didca. Story on Channel 2 and again when she was in the movie, "Mary, Queen of Scotts."
Glenda Jackson is Elizabeth 1 in my mind when it comes to historical drama’s about the Tudors. Both of those performances are stellar but her performance in Elizabeth R still commands a lot of respect and admiration. Miss Jackson certainly opened my eyes and sparked an interest in this magnificent monarch.
Smart woman that queen Elizabeth. There is full authority & power under that crown and she denied all proposals with no regrets. Didn't phase her what was told to her she wasn't hand over the power to anyone at all 😁
Because of Henry and Cromwell's betrayal Elizabeth's mother us killed. Henry goes on to destroy other women. Thus, Elizabeth would NEVER subjugate herself to a husband- who would become King, usurping the throne, according to the Royal rules of the time.
Except for the man (her father) whose crown she inherited and the countless men who advised her and protected her life, without whom she would've been "eliminated" on day 1. Other than that...
@@PJPeterson without a mother's womb all those men would have ended their lives as sperm cells...get it??? they would NOT exist and neither would you... had I been your mother
Elizabeth got her revenge against Henry 8th for murdering her mother. She saw how he treated women ... and children. She was determined that no man would ever treat her that way. So, she never married.
and she basically made his nightmare come true, even from beyond grave! by ending the dynasty he was obsessed with and making his attempts for male heir, for nothing
I'm from India 🇮🇳 and I have always admired and loved Queen Elizabeth 1 Tudor (aka The Virgin Queen and Good Queen Bess) and her legacy. She was a really powerful and a strong woman by all means. In this day and age, when feminism is rampant and has become toxic, there are a lot of wannabe women who portray themselves as strong and independent, which is sad. Well, here was Elizabeth 1, a truly strong woman, a real inspiration.
Si Si 👍 ojalá pi opoooop pop 💩 PO opoooo o oolong o ojalá PPP or iodine I iodine 1:27 1:27 iooam oam in poppio o p o oop ojalá please oipi popopopopopopopopooppòpopò
El ser de un horóscopo X no quiere decir si eres fuerte o debil. Es la traision, es el llegar a un poder, es la vurla de un gavilán. Hoy una bruja casadora, y un inútil son Reyes. Una inocente la sacricaron unos lobos. Ella cinicamente se hizo presente. El poca madre la invito a su boda. Ella sorpresa vio que estaba presente una bruja y inocentemente penso que recuperaria el amor de su vida. El nieto y una abuela son reyes. Una madre castrante y un hijo debil son Reyes. Que pagaran ambos el tiempo nos dira. .
There's some debate now about the Tillbury (spelling?) speech. Lucy Worsley's series discusses it. From what I recall, it is now though she gave the speech after the Armada disaster. Don't remember for sure, but it is interesting that we're still learning new things about history.
Assuming that all of these accounts of history are truthful and taking them all at face value, we have much to learn from our history and must seek to apply these lessons from history to our current times and current situations - it also shows us that our history is complicated and intertwined with such things as religion, ie Catholic v Protestant and there are many lessons to be drawn from all of this history
I really doubt Elizabeth could marry anyone, even if she wanted to all of her recognized suitors were either kings or princes from other foreign powerful dynasties and by accepting either of them, she would've been handing England over to a foreign monarchy (you lie if you say you can even imagine such a thing or at least imagine English at the time accepting such a fate) which isn't just strategic weakness, but contrasts to everything she dreamed about as a queen. in best case, she had to marry an ordinary English nobleman which would be far beneath her, but at that would be much more acceptable for people which leaves Robert Dudley, but of course, he was hated and a pariah among courtiers, so she and him were star-crossed lovers in every way imaginable and she definitely couldn't have marry a pirate. and by considering how much unwilling she was to be under control of a man (I mean look at how Mary I's marriage with Philip turned out and worse than that, the way Henry VIII, Elizabeth's god damn father treated his wives, including her mother) by all accounts getting married was just not meant to be for her. she didn't want it and neither did the nature and universe
@@lporquai9048 Lord Darnley was legally King consort and not King of Scots. The title King of Scots was given to him by Mary but was not, as required, approved by parliament.. He had no ruling authority. He also demanded the Crown Matrimonial which would have made him co-ruler and given him succession rights but it was never given. Just to name one.
Elizabeth The Queen Mother Crowned at early age of 16 years old.. Married to Franz Baviera and Josef Asburgo. Sophie and Rodolfo Sophie reign UK United Kingdom as Elizabeth II.. Rodolfo reign GB Great Britain as Edward..
Marys mother, Catherine of Arogan was Catholic. Henry split from the Catholic church to marry Elizabeths mother, Anne Boleyn. They were then protestant or called it the Church of England. You were considered a heretic if you were openly Catholic. It's pretty wild.
@@williethomas5116 Agreed, however this is considered blasphemy to the Catholic's during this time period. The staunch differences in the way each faction worshipped led folks to consider the other religion worshipping practically a different god. This is why the narrator phrased it the way they did.
Yes, I agree. Their claim was pathetically weak. At least Richard York had a strong legitimate claim to the throne. Now, did he kill his nephews to get the throne? We still don’t know for certain conclusively, but it is certain that he was the rightful King of England.
38:13 yeah I’m sure there was NO artistic license to make her look younger lol yeah she wore a ton of makeup but had he painted her to look her age he’d have lost his head 😂
@@Consrignrant I take it that you must be an 'unbeliever' in GOD - therefore, you DON'T know - of *HIS BLESSINGS* nor of *HIS MIRACLES.* TOO BAD, for you!!!
Super documentary comprehensive information with some lesser known historical details which shed a different light on the Tudor siblings. However the music is distracting, too loud and repetitive.
Henry killed and divorced to get a male heir to lead England into its Golden Age, meanwhile, the future monarch who would make it all happen grew up right under Henry's nose, invisible... Just a little girl in a men's world.
The narrator, and she is not alone in this , always describe the main characters,as " incredibly handsome"or" beautiful," . When,if their portraits are anything to go by, were pot ugly. Seems pyshophancy is ingrained in the English. For centuries. Maybe they are afraid they will get their heads chopped off if they tell the truth .
Maybe the artists just weren't that good back then? Perhaps they were not capable of capturing a true likeness. I mean to be honest I think a lot of the portraits look very similar.
@@juliepeters3716 maybe the artists were just too good at capturing their likeness. Henry 8 had Holbein repaint one of his too realistic portraits of himself, and his daughter Queen Elizabeth did much the same; ordering that no new portraits be shown of herself over the age of thirty. Wouldn't have mattered. She was still pock-marked, toothless and bald before she was thirty anyway. In truth, she looked as ugly on the outside as she was on the inside. A Tyrant.
It does not really matter he is still a male everyone would look up to him and he would still be a king a king consort but still just because he is male everyone would want him to rule over Elizabeth she played it smart refused to marry to give any man her power and position and refused children due to her fathers treatment of her mother and her stepmother.
There was a lot more at stake back then compared to Elizabeth's 2 century. Monarchs had a lot more political power then. Every one of noble birth wanted a piece of it. She couldn't trust anyone, least of all a princely husband. In a religiously divided country, she would have been at risk of being plotted against. The wrong ambitious, royal or noble husband, would have been the perfect figure head for potential plotters. This included other powerful monarchs who wanted to install their own puppets on the English throne . She couldn't trust anyone. Her choice gave her all the power and kept her on the throne for decades.
It’s not only important that she not marry because she would be married to a man (not a king, but one whom would be favored over her, as a man), to whom she would religiously be REQUIRED to FIRST obey, and fall in line with any and all her husband’s demands… before any of her demands as queen of England. That was the rule of her times by marriage and by rule as a monarch. This is far different from the laws of other queens beyond her time and beyond comprehension by leaders of today.
Elizabeth II was able to marry and keep her position as monarch because it was the 20th century and things had moved on. As head of a Constitutional Monarchy parliament insured whoever she married would not become monarch.
Yes, Mary Boleyn had two children (many say both were Henry VIII's children but neither were ever recognized) Catherine and Henry Carey. Catherine's daughter was a Lady of Elizabeth's household.
Elizabeth was wise in covering her tracks had she ever been implicated in the Wyatt plot but Mary showed time and time again that she was dumb and not clever in the slightest;seriously why implicate yourself obviously in these kinds of things? Couldn't she learn from her cousins example
Elisabeth II hizo casi lo mismo Solo que no dejó que Felipe de Edimburgo, fuese rey Noooo, aquí mando solamente Yo CUANDO LA REINA QUIERE, EL REY SE QUEDA FUERA 😊
You understand why I only mostly write ? As I know I will survive and I can read my own writing. I bewaeth the only Bible to my only son Jesus. My 32 trillion slaves and 32 trillion sevants and assets etc go to my Sister Mary mother and wife of my only son Jesus.
RATU ISLAM ASLI KONSTRIBUSI SATU DUNIA, YANG DI DAPAT CUMA SECUIL DAN MISKIN. RAKYAT CUMA MANGAP" MERUSAK DAN MENIKMATI DUIT KERAJAAN SAJA. RATU ASLI DISEKAP, RAKYAT DAN RAJA RATU MALING CUMA MANGAP" HAAAA DUIT.
Out of all the Monarchs Elizabeth I is my favorite. She was strong and ruled with her head not her heart. She knew the Tudor dynasty would end regardless rather with her or because of Marriage so she decided to be the virgin queen and never take a husband. That’s power and that made her a legacy.
You have to love the irony of the Tudor family.
People loved Kathrine of Aragon but most hated her daughter Mary. People hated Anne but most loved Elizabeth
The son that Henry had to have is barely remembered but yet the daughter he shunned the most is the hair that he needed.
I think that the reason she was such a successful queen is because she learned from her brother and sister mistakes.
The biggest difference between Mary Stuart and Elizabeth is Mary ruled with heart not her head she was a woman before she was a ruler. Elizabeth was a ruler first and she ruled with her head.
I honestly think the reason she never married was because she saw how her father wives were treated and because she was sexually abused by Tomas Seymour
mary was only hated by staunch protestants
Well said.
Yeah, Elizabeth I wasn't going to let any man or woman push her away from the throne.
She also would not have wanted to share or give up that power. Elizabeth made sacrifices that Mary Stuart did not. You rightly said “ Mary ruled with her heart “first and Elizabeth with her head before her heart. Elizabeth also knew that naming a successor was like placing a target on your back because everyone runs after the heir.
the bigger irony is that Elizabeth wasn't this huge hater of Mary Stuart as people think she was. Mary was actually her favorite choice as heir and she would chose her in a heartbeat over literally everyone else who were claiming the throne.
Either way the Tudor dynasty would've ended with Elizabeth. I believe this is the reason Elizabeth never married or had children...doing both would've meant her giving up power. I don't really blame her decision.
They thing is, even if she would have birthed an heir, it would have ended the Tudor dynasty, as her husbands line would have become the dynastic name. Ex: Victoria was house of Hanover, but Edward VII was Saxe Coburg Gotha. Prince Philip, and lord Mountbatten, thought when Elizabeth II became queen the house name would change to Mountbatten. But, government stood up and made sure it stayed Windsor.
Very right. I'd like to add. Elizabeth I did the best thing for herself and her time. I understand the logic. She would hold her position well and then, like a loving mother, see that things may be as orderly as possible by the time she passes away, i.e. passing her crown to James of Scotland.
Mary of Teck and Churchill were intensely against the idea of the house of Mountbatten.
Queen Victoria was the only Queen to change the name. Queen Anne of Great Britain was still a Stuart even after marriage and had a son (who died of smallpox) but had he of lived and become King would it not still be the house of Stuart then? 🤔
@@Natashaa_1 to quote tootsie pop, the world may never know.
@@Natashaa_1her son was a member of the house of oldenburg
Regarding the defeat of the Spanish Armada, one detail is very often overlooked and it's important because it provides a great deal of context for why it happened. While the galleon was the fastest ship of the time, the Spanish were not heading to English waters for a naval fight. Rather, they were on a mission to land on English soil with the goal of starting a land war.
Two things worked marvelously in Elizabeth's favor. She had intelligence from Sir Francis Walsingham that her country was in danger of attack by the Spanish and therefore could prepare for it. And then the weather changed, miraculously, in favor of the English fleet and they were able to maneuver quickly and with more agility than the ill-equipped Armada, with Drake's command, and easily cause mass casualties along with what the weather had already done to the Spanish.
Spain was completely unprepared to be caught off guard in the water before they'd made landfall. That's why the English were able to overtake them.
Thanks for sharing dearie.
Fha
,
Amen❤❤❤
Also, Drake was quick-witted, courageous, and a bit wild but not very reckless (at least in comparison to others who served the Queen). He and the naval commanders used everything they had to their advantage and then kept engaging until they made the Spanish essentially think the English were half demon creatures of the sea, chasing them down WITH FIRE - to the continent and some to the mists of the Scottish Sea.
One of the things that has made me admire Elizabeth and get advisors most is their intelligence operations and utilizing psychology (whether they realized it beyond "human nature" or not)
You are only reiterating history, so what is your point.
How sad king Henry destroyed so many wives to have a son .And it end up with a wiser ,strong daughter queen.
God's sense of irony is unmatched.
El destino es impredecible y le jugo una mala jugada al Rey.
How sad Elizabeth killed his dynasty and how ironic that it is the entire reason he destroyed those other wives. She ultimately made them die in vain.
I've always admired and looked up to Queen Elizabeth 1st, starting when I saw Glenda Jackson play the part of the queen in the 1970's both when they didca. Story on Channel 2 and again when she was in the movie, "Mary, Queen of Scotts."
Glenda Jackson is Elizabeth 1 in my mind when it comes to historical drama’s about the Tudors. Both of those performances are stellar but her performance in Elizabeth R still commands a lot of respect and admiration. Miss Jackson certainly opened my eyes and sparked an interest in this magnificent monarch.
Smart woman that queen Elizabeth. There is full authority & power under that crown and she denied all proposals with no regrets. Didn't phase her what was told to her she wasn't hand over the power to anyone at all 😁
I agree and if she said its raining its pissing it down
Because of Henry and Cromwell's betrayal Elizabeth's mother us killed. Henry goes on to destroy other women. Thus, Elizabeth would NEVER subjugate herself to a husband- who would become King, usurping the throne, according to the Royal rules of the time.
She’s a strong independent woman who do NOT need no man 💅👠💅
Except for the man (her father) whose crown she inherited and the countless men who advised her and protected her life, without whom she would've been "eliminated" on day 1. Other than that...
@@PJPeterson without a mother's womb all those men would have ended their lives as sperm cells...get it??? they would NOT exist and neither would you... had I been your mother
@@PJPetersonshut up
@@Daphxxne No.
@@PJPeterson yes🫶🏻
Elizabeth got her revenge against Henry 8th for murdering her mother. She saw how he treated women ... and children. She was determined that no man would ever treat her that way. So, she never married.
😊
and she basically made his nightmare come true, even from beyond grave! by ending the dynasty he was obsessed with and making his attempts for male heir, for nothing
This ending the dynasty
18:46 @@altinaykor364
How is it revenge to die with no heir or anyone to carry your name? There was no revenge, nor did Elizabeth seek it. Neofeminist revisionist nonsense.
I'm from India 🇮🇳 and I have always admired and loved Queen Elizabeth 1 Tudor (aka The Virgin Queen and Good Queen Bess) and her legacy. She was a really powerful and a strong woman by all means. In this day and age, when feminism is rampant and has become toxic, there are a lot of wannabe women who portray themselves as strong and independent, which is sad. Well, here was Elizabeth 1, a truly strong woman, a real inspiration.
Si Si 👍 ojalá pi opoooop pop 💩 PO opoooo o oolong o ojalá PPP or iodine I iodine 1:27 1:27 iooam oam in poppio o p o oop ojalá please oipi popopopopopopopopooppòpopò
@@footballbezt3213Are you being racist here? Couldn't understand ur writing.
your point about feminism has turned toxic😭how much you're right, and that hurts😢😢😢
I agree with you. Sadly, feminism has become quite toxic. And yet, the concept is not "new". Elizabeth I was a true independent woman ❤
Feminists today do zero justice to women. All women and men should respect and admire and Elizabeth I
Greatest female monarch throughout British history！What a glorious Queen Elizabeth I❤❤❤
I don’t like the Tudors much but I respect Elizabeth I
@@弘历爱新觉罗 if you believe that, you will believe anything.
Elisabeth the first was an evil tyrant.
She murdered her cousin!
@ingridwatsup9671 some fucking cousin she turned out to be!
She was born to be a Queen.
Yes…a queen consort.
@@direfranchement yes and no.
LOVE ELIZABETH
Im a Virgo woman too.
We are quite strong and typically have good hearts.
Agree, I'm a Virgo woman too!
Astrology is nonsense.
@Sonic-dogmagitrac
@@Consrignrant
Traducir al español
El ser de un horóscopo X no quiere decir si eres fuerte o debil.
Es la traision, es el llegar a un poder, es la vurla de un gavilán.
Hoy una bruja casadora, y un inútil son Reyes.
Una inocente la sacricaron unos lobos.
Ella cinicamente se hizo presente.
El poca madre la invito a su boda.
Ella sorpresa vio que estaba presente una bruja y inocentemente penso que recuperaria el amor de su vida.
El nieto y una abuela son reyes.
Una madre castrante y un hijo debil son Reyes.
Que pagaran ambos el tiempo nos dira.
.
There's some debate now about the Tillbury (spelling?) speech. Lucy Worsley's series discusses it. From what I recall, it is now though she gave the speech after the Armada disaster. Don't remember for sure, but it is interesting that we're still learning new things about history.
I call it destiny! Shw was Destined to be a queen ❤️
Loved it, thank you!! 😍👌
Wow, what a powerful voice! This artist's vocal range is incredible, and the emotion they convey is just captivating
Assuming that all of these accounts of history are truthful and taking them all at face value, we have much to learn from our history and must seek to apply these lessons from history to our current times and current situations - it also shows us that our history is complicated and intertwined with such things as religion, ie Catholic v Protestant and there are many lessons to be drawn from all of this history
Elizabeth siempre me sorprende, su personalidad y su aporte al reino de cultura y arte.
I really doubt Elizabeth could marry anyone, even if she wanted to
all of her recognized suitors were either kings or princes from other foreign powerful dynasties and by accepting either of them, she would've been handing England over to a foreign monarchy (you lie if you say you can even imagine such a thing or at least imagine English at the time accepting such a fate) which isn't just strategic weakness, but contrasts to everything she dreamed about as a queen.
in best case, she had to marry an ordinary English nobleman which would be far beneath her, but at that would be much more acceptable for people which leaves Robert Dudley, but of course, he was hated and a pariah among courtiers, so she and him were star-crossed lovers in every way imaginable and she definitely couldn't have marry a pirate. and by considering how much unwilling she was to be under control of a man (I mean look at how Mary I's marriage with Philip turned out and worse than that, the way Henry VIII, Elizabeth's god damn father treated his wives, including her mother) by all accounts getting married was just not meant to be for her. she didn't want it and neither did the nature and universe
She was essentially a perfect ruler in her time.
absolutely loved this documentary .i love british history .
Lovely she is younger than her age... ahead of time ❤❤❤❤
Well, this is a nice video. There are some facts that are completely in accurate.
Like what?
Wich of them??
@@lporquai9048 Lord Darnley was legally King consort and not King of Scots. The title King of Scots was given to him by Mary but was not, as required, approved by parliament.. He had no ruling authority. He also demanded the Crown Matrimonial which would have made him co-ruler and given him succession rights but it was never given. Just to name one.
Elizabeth : I want to be a virgin queen!
Henry the 7th : rolling in his grave!
Philip II didn’t sail from Spain to the Netherlands before the Armada in 1588.
He didn’t leave Spain again after he returned there in 1560.
Where have you got this from? Because Spain controlled Netherlands and the low countries from 55 ?
Yes he did..
Can you imagine arguing with people who study history and have a whole tv show about it.
THIS IS GAME OF THRONES, MANY SITUATIONS THE SAME
Ivan the Terrible was thinking of marrying Elizabeth as well.
They continually drag out the marriage question. We got it the first time.
Elizabeth The Queen Mother
Crowned at early age of 16 years old..
Married to Franz Baviera and Josef Asburgo.
Sophie and Rodolfo
Sophie reign UK United Kingdom as Elizabeth II..
Rodolfo reign GB Great Britain as Edward..
Me encanto el documental de elizabeth primera ❤😊
The extraordinaty strong Gloriana ❤
¡ Muchas gracias !
❤a
Why does it say that Mary believes in a "different" God from Elizabeth???
Catholic God (Queen Mary's) vs. Protestant God (Queen Elizabeth I's).
Marys mother, Catherine of Arogan was Catholic. Henry split from the Catholic church to marry Elizabeths mother, Anne Boleyn. They were then protestant or called it the Church of England. You were considered a heretic if you were openly Catholic. It's pretty wild.
@@Alanik06but they are choosing to worship the same God in different ways.
@@williethomas5116 Agreed, however this is considered blasphemy to the Catholic's during this time period. The staunch differences in the way each faction worshipped led folks to consider the other religion worshipping practically a different god. This is why the narrator phrased it the way they did.
Good question. It's the same God. The problem with Catholicism is that the Pope has more power than the Word of God. Do some research on the Jesuits.
¡¡¡Excelente documental!!! Gracias
The whole Tudor dynasty was a self emploding dynasty!!!
*imploding
Despite male Tudor interests
Simplemente ESPECTACULAR! ❤
The Tudors had a weak claim to the throne which is why they had no other choice to take the crown in battle.
Yes, I agree. Their claim was pathetically weak. At least Richard York had a strong legitimate claim to the throne. Now, did he kill his nephews to get the throne? We still don’t know for certain conclusively, but it is certain that he was the rightful King of England.
Edward became the prince of England and German
LOVE YOU ELIZABETH
Ana Bolena and James Tudor born children..
Elizabeth Tudor.. George Wales
Edward Tudor.. Mariane Somerset
Exelents biografi and very artict performance❤
Super Smart,
I think Katherine Parr sent Elizabeth away to protect her.
I think so as well.
Excelente
❤
Supremamente consciente de cambios una niña de 2 años hay Dios estos historiadores
Why is the title missing the “I” in Elizabeth
It’s not
Excelente historia
38:13 yeah I’m sure there was NO artistic license to make her look younger lol yeah she wore a ton of makeup but had he painted her to look her age he’d have lost his head 😂
Tons of makeup. Agreed. She insisted upon the maiden queen appearance.
GOD gave her the "victory" over the Armada ... it was England's "destiny."
No, the weather gave England the "victory". Imbecile.
@@Consrignrant If JESUS could still the ''storm'' - HE could also raise IT up.
It WAS GOD who made it England's destiny to triumph over the Armada.
@@tsbrowne6787 Lol. Not much going on between your ears, is there.
@@Consrignrant I take it that you must be an 'unbeliever' in GOD -
therefore, you DON'T know - of *HIS BLESSINGS* nor of *HIS MIRACLES.*
TOO BAD, for you!!!
@@tsbrowne6787 I think you rattled their demons! 😄
✌️🧸🇬🇧 God has your fate ...in the palm of His hand ...and His band, continues to play ▶️
Grandiosa Reina.
0:07 bet she had a dopple ganger in ireland 0:23 😂❤
🖤
Super documentary comprehensive information with some lesser known historical details which shed a different light on the Tudor siblings. However the music is distracting, too loud and repetitive.
Aprenda a concentrarce
Ella es iconica ✨️
Marabilloso❤❤❤
Oh to sit and spend just 24 hours with her. And talk. No, I take that back, I'd just listen...
Pues que lo deje en Paz y que tenga su hijito felicitaciones ❤❤❤
Henry killed and divorced to get a male heir to lead England into its Golden Age, meanwhile, the future monarch who would make it all happen grew up right under Henry's nose, invisible... Just a little girl in a men's world.
They don’t even mention that the Spanish fleet was much, much older and more cumbersome
According to this Elizabeth never executed Mary of Scott
The narrator, and she is not alone in this , always describe the main characters,as " incredibly handsome"or" beautiful," .
When,if their portraits are anything to go by, were pot ugly.
Seems pyshophancy is ingrained in the English. For centuries. Maybe they are afraid they will get their heads chopped off if they tell the truth .
Maybe the artists just weren't that good back then? Perhaps they were not capable of capturing a true likeness. I mean to be honest I think a lot of the portraits look very similar.
@@juliepeters3716 maybe the artists were just too good at capturing their likeness. Henry 8 had Holbein repaint one of his too realistic portraits of himself, and his daughter Queen Elizabeth did much the same; ordering that no new portraits be shown of herself over the age of thirty. Wouldn't have mattered. She was still pock-marked, toothless and bald before she was thirty anyway.
In truth, she looked as ugly on the outside as she was on the inside.
A Tyrant.
29:09 Sonó muy genial 👑
She could have done what Elizabeth 11 did, marry a Prince not a King and keep the Tudor line.
It does not really matter he is still a male everyone would look up to him and he would still be a king a king consort but still just because he is male everyone would want him to rule over Elizabeth she played it smart refused to marry to give any man her power and position and refused children due to her fathers treatment of her mother and her stepmother.
There was a lot more at stake back then compared to Elizabeth's 2 century. Monarchs had a lot more political power then. Every one of noble birth wanted a piece of it. She couldn't trust anyone, least of all a princely husband. In a religiously divided country, she would have been at risk of being plotted against. The wrong ambitious, royal or noble husband, would have been the perfect figure head for potential plotters. This included other powerful monarchs who wanted to install their own puppets on the English throne . She couldn't trust anyone. Her choice gave her all the power and kept her on the throne for decades.
It’s not only important that she not marry because she would be married to a man (not a king, but one whom would be favored over her, as a man), to whom she would religiously be REQUIRED to FIRST obey, and fall in line with any and all her husband’s demands… before any of her demands as queen of England. That was the rule of her times by marriage and by rule as a monarch. This is far different from the laws of other queens beyond her time and beyond comprehension by leaders of today.
Elizabeth II was able to marry and keep her position as monarch because it was the 20th century and things had moved on. As head of a Constitutional Monarchy parliament insured whoever she married would not become monarch.
🎉
I have a question.... Elisabeth had nephews or nieces I think?! From her mother's sister (her aunt) Mary Boleyn's Children? Is this a true fact?
Those would be cousins. If her siblings, Mary and Edward, had kids, they would have been her nieces and nephews.
Yes, Mary Boleyn had two children (many say both were Henry VIII's children but neither were ever recognized) Catherine and Henry Carey. Catherine's daughter was a Lady of Elizabeth's household.
11:42 , this isn't affection, this is sexual abuse lol
Nothing "lol" about it. Grow up
@@proudsussexerthe lol is about historians who talk about a " romance " between 13 years old elizabeth and a 30' years old man
@@proudsussexerhe tried to mary her older sister Mary first, it was never a romance and he never cared about Elizabeth
@@dendenne4856 Understood
@@dendenne4856 Yes I know that
R.I.P
You misspelled her name on the thumbnail.
Lol. It is indeed mispelled! Yikes
Elzabeth! Lol
Elizabeth was wise in covering her tracks had she ever been implicated in the Wyatt plot but Mary showed time and time again that she was dumb and not clever in the slightest;seriously why implicate yourself obviously in these kinds of things? Couldn't she learn from her cousins example
I prefer Marie Stuart
Henrry o Enrrique ?
Elizabeth o Isabel ?
Que extraña traducción de Enrique "eicho" por Enrique "octavo"... Fallo 😡
Warna iris mata Ratu Elizabeth 1 sama seperti warna iris mata Saya.
Era una mujer muy inteligente
none of this history was in the movie with blancett
con este audio lo va a ver tu PM
Henry 8 ?? .No será Henry VIII (octavo)
Elizabeth I was no more a virgin than Mick Jagger 😂
Really ?
Oh please..
@@lporquai9048 are you really asking that?
@@diamond13130 She was well known to have had lovers. I mean… do you think they just snuggled?
@@Andy_Babb No, it is not "well known". You're talking out of your *ss.
Pero los protestantes y los católicos creen en el mismo Dios, la Santísima Trinidad, son diferentes en doctrinas pero Dios es el mismo para ambos
You mean Henry 8.
Mucha injusticia todo por no aceptar que una mujer suceda la corona.
Why is the title name spelled Elzabeth? And NOT ELIZABETH?
so, Anne poisoned him?! wtf
Ambiciosa igual a la madre
根源は、自分を愛せないものが、人を愛せるだろうか。
確かに、危ない自己中心的になりやすいです。慈悲とは。
自分だけの幸福もない。他人だけの不幸もないですよね～。
Elisabeth II hizo casi lo mismo
Solo que no dejó que Felipe de Edimburgo, fuese rey
Noooo, aquí mando solamente Yo
CUANDO LA REINA QUIERE, EL REY SE QUEDA FUERA 😊
You understand why I only mostly write ? As I know I will survive and I can read my own writing.
I bewaeth the only Bible to my only son Jesus. My 32 trillion slaves and 32 trillion sevants and assets etc go to my Sister Mary mother and wife of my only son Jesus.
Weren't Tudors usurpers?
Xenia so ass exinia una de esas claves qu. Extiendien. No.
自分を犠牲にするとは違うよね～。
.
RATU ISLAM ASLI KONSTRIBUSI SATU DUNIA, YANG DI DAPAT CUMA SECUIL DAN MISKIN. RAKYAT CUMA MANGAP" MERUSAK DAN MENIKMATI DUIT KERAJAAN SAJA. RATU ASLI DISEKAP, RAKYAT DAN RAJA RATU MALING CUMA MANGAP" HAAAA DUIT.
Your comment makes no sense