Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
शिव और शंकर में महान अंतर | Difference between Shiv & Shankar
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 фев 2023
- शिव और शंकर में अंतर | Difference between Shiv & Shankar @brahmakumaris
►Copyright : Brahma Kumaris
Watch “#BrahmaKumaris - Program.."
Click on goo.gl/S9sdJY ... to SUBSCRIBE
FOR LATEST UPDATES :
❤ Subscribe Now:goo.gl/S9sdJY
Facebook : / brahmakumaris
RUclips:- / brahmakumaris
Twitter :- / brahmakumaris
Instagram :- / brahmakumaris
Pinterest:- / brahmakumaris
Flickr :- www.flickr.com...
Linkedin :- / brahmakumaris
Soundcloud:- / brahmakumaris
Whatsapp:- wa.me/91941415...
Telegram:- t.me/brahmakum...
Messenger:- m.me/brahamkum...
Blog:- brahmakumaris....
Koo - www.kooapp.com...
Website :- www.brahmakumar...
www.brahmakumar...
E-mail : info@brahmakumaris.com
Om Shanti...❤❤❤
ओम नमः शिवाय ओम नमः शिवाय ओम
ॐ शांती दीदी 🙏
दोनों एक ही हैं।
Nahi hai
Shiv baba is creator of shankhar bhagwan
Sahi kaha aapne didi ji ❤❤❤
Arey Tum log tho pagal hai
Pagal toh tumlog ho🤣🤣🤣 bewakoof insaan shankar, vishnu aur bharma yhe 3 se v bara ek bhagwan hai… jis bhagwan ko yhe teeno v puja karte hai… Sankar kiska tapasya karta hai? Woh uss bhagwan ka tapasya karta hai jo usse bara hai, vishnu aur bharma v ussi bhagwan ko tapasya karta hai… tumlog pagal, bewakoof insaan log hindu, muslim, christan karte raho… bhagwan ek hi hai aur na woh hindu hai na christan na muslim.
कोई शास्त्र प्रमाण है भी पाखंडियों तुम्हारे पास ??
Koi pramaan nhi hai inke pass...
Bass Jo Mann Mei aayega bol denge aur khud ko bohot gyani kahenge ....
Agar Sach Mei shiv aur shankar alag hai toh mere iss sawaal ka jawab do
Shivling bhagwan shiv ka moorti hai naa ki shankar ki toh phir shivling ke sath kyun nandi ji aur parvati ji ki pooja hoti hai kyunki shiv ka toh koi parivaar toh hai nhi toh phir aisa kyun .....?
@@KalkaSat तुम तो पढ़े हो, श्लोक, संहिता आदि बताओ ना फिर।
@@KalkaSat do bade bhai shiv puran ke shlok ka reference do....
Depictions:
Shiva: Often depicted as a formless entity, a Jyotirlinga (column of light), or a cosmic dancer (Nataraja).
Shankar: Typically portrayed in a human form with a serene expression, adorned with a trident (Trishul) and a serpent around his neck.
Roles and Responsibilities:
Shiva: Represents the ultimate reality, the unchanging absolute. He embodies creation, preservation, and destruction as part of the cosmic cycle.
Shankar: Seen as a more active aspect of Shiva, responsible for carrying out specific functions within the cycle. He might be associated with specific stories and interactions with other deities.
Understanding through analogy:
Imagine the sun as Shiva - the source of light and energy. Shankar would then be like the sunlight - a manifestation of the sun's power that interacts with the world.
While Shiva is the ultimate source, Shankar is the form we can comprehend and relate to.
It's important to note that some interpretations view Shiva and Shankar as essentially the same. The concept of their difference lies in emphasizing the formless versus the manifested aspects of the same divine being.
Depictions:
Shiva: Often depicted as a formless entity, a Jyotirlinga (column of light), or a cosmic dancer (Nataraja).
Shankar: Typically portrayed in a human form with a serene expression, adorned with a trident (Trishul) and a serpent around his neck.
Roles and Responsibilities:
Shiva: Represents the ultimate reality, the unchanging absolute. He embodies creation, preservation, and destruction as part of the cosmic cycle.
Shankar: Seen as a more active aspect of Shiva, responsible for carrying out specific functions within the cycle. He might be associated with specific stories and interactions with other deities.
Understanding through analogy:
Imagine the sun as Shiva - the source of light and energy. Shankar would then be like the sunlight - a manifestation of the sun's power that interacts with the world.
While Shiva is the ultimate source, Shankar is the form we can comprehend and relate to.
It's important to note that some interpretations view Shiva and Shankar as essentially the same. The concept of their difference lies in emphasizing the formless versus the manifested aspects of the same divine being.