I'm currently learning how to mix my musics and every time I search for an information on youtube, your videos pop up haha Thank you for your work, you're really helping :)
Thanks for making these videos, you can read manuals until your blue in the face - but manuals don't tell you how it sounds and what to listen for, nor the end result. Between using automation items (as described here) and automation pre-fx envelopes you can cover just about everything. I know some use auto-trim, but I'd prefer to do automation and know it is done the best I can get it. Thanks again!
I don't think they haven't thought of them, I think it's hard to implement correctly (it took Cockos half a year of work and many iterations to do it properly) so it's one of those features developers think twice before engaging a lot of effort in it.
@ 3:16 I don't see mine getting the visual adjustment when I move the volume. I can *hear* the volume ducking from the automation, I just don't see that wave form being altered. Is this a setting?
This is not my understanding of de-essing. You are doing time domain amplitude adjustment! De-essing is a frequency dependent filter that only normalises (compresses) certain frequencies. 'S' are typically above 7kHz so using a band pass compressor above those frequencies would be more appropriate. You should hone in on the sibilants that need sorting out. All you are doing is amplitude modulation which can sound horrible over a long period.
So if I make Ess sounds with my mouth that are lower in volume, it will "sound horrible over a long period"? Agree to disagree. I think changing the frequency of the sound at certain points sounds weird and un-natural to me.
I'm currently learning how to mix my musics and every time I search for an information on youtube, your videos pop up haha
Thank you for your work, you're really helping :)
The global volume function for essss i have wanted and searched for in the past... thank you!
This is unreal! This is the key to pro vox. I tried this with harsh consonants too and it is incredible. Thanks again Kenny.
Really digging these enhancements to Reaper's automation functionality.
Thanks for making these videos, you can read manuals until your blue in the face - but manuals don't tell you how it sounds and what to listen for, nor the end result. Between using automation items (as described here) and automation pre-fx envelopes you can cover just about everything. I know some use auto-trim, but I'd prefer to do automation and know it is done the best I can get it. Thanks again!
I had a hunch that this could be done and you have cleared up the questions i had about them.
Kenny this is simply genious. wish I had seen this video a few weeks ago, would have saved me a whole day. Reaper is amazing.
Really great improvement. Kudos to you and Justin!
Justin and Schwa (John Schwarz) are the developers.
Automation Items is genius. I don't know how no other major company thought of them.
I don't think they haven't thought of them, I think it's hard to implement correctly (it took Cockos half a year of work and many iterations to do it properly) so it's one of those features developers think twice before engaging a lot of effort in it.
I think FL implemented this many years ago
This is exactly what I need right now Kenny thanks!!
Thanks Kenny for another very useful tutorial!
Great video, I had De-ess automation on my agenda for today! Wouldn't those colored spectral peaks help a lot?
new intro. yeh... lets go kenny
Anybody else finds it funny when the lyrics say "Im a horse" ? :D
@ 3:16 I don't see mine getting the visual adjustment when I move the volume. I can *hear* the volume ducking from the automation, I just don't see that wave form being altered. Is this a setting?
Brilliant!
Шикарно!
Brilliant !!!
Thanks!
Espetacular...
Wow!
This is not my understanding of de-essing. You are doing time domain amplitude adjustment! De-essing is a frequency dependent filter that only normalises (compresses) certain frequencies. 'S' are typically above 7kHz so using a band pass compressor above those frequencies would be more appropriate. You should hone in on the sibilants that need sorting out. All you are doing is amplitude modulation which can sound horrible over a long period.
So if I make Ess sounds with my mouth that are lower in volume, it will "sound horrible over a long period"? Agree to disagree. I think changing the frequency of the sound at certain points sounds weird and un-natural to me.