SIMPLE DEFINITIONS for ALL the Cognitive Functions (Si, Ni, Se, Ne, Fi, Ti, Te, Fe)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 сен 2024
- We give simple definitions for all the extraverted and introverted cognitive functions.
☆Check out what I'm up to!☆
Hi there! I'm Joyce, a certified MBTI® Master Practitioner, Enneagram Coach, Jungian Typology Expert, Master NLP Practitioner, and Gallup® CliftonStrengths Coach.
WONDERING WHICH ONE OF THE 16 PERSONALITY TYPES YOU ARE?
Book a session to get my take on your type. I'd love to help guide you on your type-discovery journey!
Here is my scheduling link to arrange a time with me:
calendly.com/j...
I charge $85 for a typing session. Another colleague of mine certified by Personality Hacker will work alongside me and we will give you our independent assessments of you.
Want to go deeper? For $97, you can purchase a typing session with 1 hour of additional coaching with me.
Or maybe you know your personality type already and are seeking some type-based coaching? As a trained coach, I can help you apply type concepts to all areas of your life for lasting change. The coaching session rate is $49.99 per hour. :)
If you’d like to get in touch, you can email me at joycemeng22@gmail.com
For those of you who are interested, I am also launching a website and releasing a typology book next year!
Here's a link to my coaching website if you'd like to learn more about me and the services I offer: www.joycemengc...
Connect with me on Twitter: / joycemeng22
Like the show? Buy me a coffee! (it means the world to me): ko-fi.com/joyc...
Show your support by becoming a monthly patron! ko-fi.com/joyc...
Want to know when the next Type Talks video is premiering? Join our Discord community for the latest updates! / discord
Cheat Sheet:
Si - Detailed Representation of Reality in Your Mind
Se - Reality as It Is
Ni - Essential Knowing of Future Reality
Ne - Expansion of Ideas to Push the Limits of Possibility
Fi - Truth of the Soul, Refined Values
Ti - Truth of the Mind, Refined Principles
Te - Application of Logic to Reach Measurable Goals
Fe - Finesse of Shared Feeling to Reach Mutually Fulfilling Relationships and Emotional Equilibrium
#INTJ #INFJ #ENFJ #ENTJ #ENFP #ENTP #INTP #INFP #ESFP #ESTP #ISFP #ISTP #ISTJ #ISFJ #ESFJ #ESTJ #16types #mbti #cognitivefunctions
As an ESFJ, I definitely use my Fe dom to connect with EVERYONE I meet. I just can't help it, I invest myself so highly with people and their current moods and situations. I'm always fascinated by people.
As a Primary school teacher, working with children with special needs, my co-workers are always either baffled or amazed how well I connect to my students, or why children are always attracted to my energy. I'm very happy with my Fe-Si combo. 🤗🤗🤗
Same here ESFJ🥰
0:11 introverted sending Si
1:29 ni or introverted intuition - essential knowing of future reality (1st: intj, infj) (Intj,infj, 2nd: entj, ENFJ)
2:40 SE extroverted sensing (Estp, Esfp) reality as it is
3:44 NE extroverted intuition (Entp, Enfp)
4:32 judging functions
4:35 Fi introverted feeling - truth of the soul - refined values (Infp, isfp)
5:19 Ti introverted thinking - truth of the mind - refined principles (intp, istp)
6:00 TE Extroverted Thinking (ESTJ, ENTJ)
Application of logic to reach measureable goals
6:41 FE Extroverted Feeling (ESFJ, ENFJ)
Finesse of shared feeling to reach mutually fulling relationships and emotional equilibrium
Your videos are great! I love that they are brief, so I can watch them in one sitting, but I can watch additional videos to broaden my depth of knowledge on MBTI. Thanks so much.
Nice to know these bite-sized videos add to your life in a positive way! :) Thanks for watching.
It seems to me that like Fe, Te can also take into consideration consensus. Or at least that's the way it seems to me from an auxiliary perspective, as I routinely consider what other people think about various matters.
Absolutely! Extraverted judging functions like to check in with group feedback, and that includes Te :)
You could say that Ne only sees what is possible from a specific starting point going forward to somewhere unknown. And Ni sees what is propable by narrowing down the most likely solution pathway. Like finding the destination of a percieved long success-path in the future. Ne alone dont know what will succeed or any destinations unless Si have experienced the Ne paths and Ne-parts before. So Ne is often very uncertain in what’s going to happen, but is rarely surpriced of the outcome if Si has a lot of experience.
This is very well explained! Thank you, Words With Meaning.
@@JoyceMeng22 You're welcome. I'm glad it actually makes sense to you bc I was a little worried it didn't make sense with everything else we know about these functions. I have heard many different explanations on all the functions that it sometimes starts to blur the clarity around them. Opinion vs truth per source fx. This happens when the explanations are a little different from source to source every time (Mostly). Fx The text before this was my attempt to explain something I have often perceived about my Ne & Si. Which only adds even more info into making more clarity vs blurring of the clarity. Obviously i was going for the clarity here.
Some time ago I was at a confused state about the clear essence & substance of Ne and Ni. They where blurring or mixing my understanding. According to all the explanations I have found about them it started to look they could do more or less the same. So why divide them right?
At some point later I was watching videos completely off this topic which also involved a lot of other stereo types outside MBTI. And I was looking more into that to prepare my self against other kinds of bias. But the interesting this was the host of this heated debate in that show often said: quote "We dont work with possibility here, We only work with probability". Because it is more real and based in reality etc. I am pretty sure he is an ESTP, trying to tell people how to be more real like him and his men etc. Classic stereotypical ESTP stuff. I was surprised to actually find it this strong.
So the more he used that statement the more clear it became how blind and irrelevant he thought about talking in terms of possibilities (Ne), to no surprise of an ESTP. His respond was to shut it down every time in any Ne argument, bc it's not real (Se).
Most of the guests was/is also Se users, so I had to wait for an episode where an Ne user joined the conversation, which is rare it seems. To see how he would deal with that person and vice versa.
A long grinding story made short. As mentioned he is blind and ignores anything Ne related and forcefully fights against it when someone communicates with Ne possibilities and only sees probability as reality. It was interesting to see this live and that narrowed it down for me to see that Ne's perception is only possibilities and Ni is probabilities (Somehow). Bc I have heard that Ne is also working with probability which seems entirely wrong in this case. And I can often really struggle with the probability aspect way more than coming up with new possibilities and analogies to roughly the same size of my Si experience. So maybe that's it really or to an extant perhaps.
Fx can Ni see possibilities or is that person actually using their Ne lower down in their stacks to do that work and vice versa for Ne users figuring out the probability using their Ni lower down?
Another possibility is using that the highest intuition function is capable but has to go through it's own long process to produce a kind of a reversed result. If Ne cant narrow down like Ni than has to test to explore every possibility like an experiment to see what happens until you hit the correct one. One by one, idea after idea. With small changes to stir the fabric of time and motion. Like the butterfly effect. Where Ni dont seem to need that and quickly spots a way that probably works. How that works is hard for me to tell.
@@Popcorn_Assassin Yeah, a lot of Se doms think they are Ne dominants. I find this to be an interesting topic; if you'd ever like to discuss the differences between Ne/Si and Ni/Se, I'd love to have a private video chat with you (if you are comfortable with that). :) Send me an email at joycemeng22@gmail.com if you are down. No pressure if you'd rather not though. I just thought it would be helpful to hear your perspective in even more depth.
This is the reason I don't really understand how Ne and in extension Ni can function without Se or Si. In order to generate ideas and possibly narrow down to one outcome, one needs to have or gather factual data about the world in the first place. Or is it the case that Ni and Ne doms make a small amount of information go a really long way?
Ni is really bad at seeing when there is a contradiction that changes the whole probability though. Often they rush through the story and focus on the beginning, end and important parts.
They tend to also follow their pathway until they think something is unlikely, which may be rare but the overall prediction is still nowhere near as likely as they think.
Imagine an Ni user who accurately predicts that X and if X then Y are very likely (90%) and if XY then Z is likely (75%) and goes off that as XYZ will very likely happen.
Simple probability says that 0.9*0.9*0.75 is 0.6075.
40% of the outcomes are virtually invisible to the Ni user despite them assuming correctly that these are the 3 overwhelmingly likely outcomes at each node
How could Se ca just know anyone wears a shirt in a strange way, without any past impression of how a shirt is worn the 'regular' way? Fashion often changes how shirts are typically worn. Whether a shirt is worn in or out of pants for example depends on the fashion of a specific time period.
Yeah. That's a good point! I view extraverted sensing as having a good awareness of the 'spectrum of the physical world'. Thus it's able to notice when something is on the lower end of the spectrum. So yes, that would require them to have some past impression of the object as well.
Se users have past impressions in the form of Ni patterns. These patterns are generalized, making them useful for evaluating new people/situations. Whereas Si archetypes are context-dependent, making them more useful for evaluating familiar people/situations.
From my experience, because Se doesn’t modify sensation or reality, I experience things with more intensity, I’ve noticed. So even when it comes to the clothing example provided, it’s not really about, ”I think this looks out of place. How can I make it better?” It’s more like, “Look at this NEON GREEN JACKET!! Wow! I need it now!” I don’t really care for whether it’s gonna look perfect, how it’s supposed to be worn. I don’t even care about whether it’s trending or what brand it is. It’s the visceral reaction to the physical properties that keeps me engaged to it. And it feels more coincidental if other people happen to like it as well.
@@beatofmyown I do know esfps indeed tend to react in such an intense way to things like you describe. It reminds me a bit of how children react vs adults if they can not have a cookie. The kid cries intensily and the adult has a higher degree of what seems to be indifference and says 'oh ok'.
What I'm curious about what you mean about Se no wanting to modify sensation/reality, this thus results in a more intense experience? Do you mean because it does not go through a layer of interpretation, which helps to create some distance to such a thing happening?
Also, this intensity seems higher in the esfp than estps. Maybe Ti rather than Fi kinda blocks intensity, as Ti is more indifferent too.
Also, I would not be suprised if estps kinda hide their intense experience, as they seem more self aware when it comes to looking cool.
@@PowerRedBullTypology Hi! Yes to the 2nd paragraph. It’s intense because there’s no interpretation. 👍🏼 And I can see how that intensity can be correlated to Fi as well. Ti tends to be indifferent.
I liked your explanation on Ni. It helped me understand my own brain. :)
When it comes to logic, another way to look at it is, deductive reasoning is Ti and inductive reasoning is Te. It's also helpful to understand that each function is a dipole with another function. Ti-Fe, Te-Fi, Si-Ne, and Se-Ni. Someone dominant in Ti will feel vulnerable with their Fe feelings and someone who is dominant with their Fe will feel vulnerable with their Ti for example.
Wonderful summary, thankyou!
I have heard that when you combine Ne and Fi (The way ENFP would combine those 2) it can simulate Fe. What do you think?
Yes, that can definitely be the case!
They also have the Get Things Going Interaction Style in Linda Beren's typology school of thought, which is covered in this video: ruclips.net/video/Hk8evF5jInI/видео.html
I thought there was a positional component to Fe. An Fe is concerned about where they line up compared to other people. I think my husband is lead Fe and where he fits within his work place has always been very important to him. When he was at a lower level, he accepted that very easily and was very faithful in serving and following those above him. As his positions at work have grown into managerial roles, he's very good at seeing the importance of his role at his position within the tribe as being one where he needs to nurture those under him (in terms of work and making sure they're moving along a pathway to grow their career).
But, if you're someone that's not under his management, and you're not either part of his social level within the company or above, then he really could care less about harmony and all the things you mentioned for Fe's. All dimwits outside of his sphere of being are easier to criticize or ignore. They're part of some other tribe, but certainly not his.
I'd also say that in terms of him seeking harmony, he's not like a hippy waving incense around and allowing everyone to do whatever feels right to them. He really wants everyone to be in harmony with what he believes is right. So back to the work example, harmony revolves around making a good product, improving the company, having integrity, etc. Harmony for harmony's sake, however, is way too loosey goosey for him and he feels like it detracts from the purpose of the company. So if you focus on people getting along in a way that actually makes it harder to focus on the good of the company, he's not down with that.
All this to say that while I agree that an Fe is seeking harmony, it doesn't always look like the hippy singing Kumbaya that we might imagine.
Your husband could be Te/Fi rather than Fe/Ti.
He sounds like an ISTJ, or maybe an ESTJ to me
Exploring "Ne" possibility....never thought of it that way
Howdy from Houston 🙋🏾♀️ 🤠
I'm an ESFJ who used to mistype as high Ti types which I know might seem surprising but this video showed me how I was mixing up Si and Ti
I sometimes get so frustrated that people can't see things as logically as I can in the world, but maybe their sense of logic is different than mine, and another thing I realized is that
I really don't care much about logic at all, I get annoyed if other people don't use it but as for using it myself? If I can get by fine without having to think about things
Even though my Si is strong I know that I have Fe first because unlike Si which I'm fully aware of, Fe is just like a fish in water
i disagree with the temporalization of Si and Ni. i dont think either of these perceiving functions are particularly directed towards either past or future. rather they do different things, and can be applied (through Ti or Te) towards either the past or future, but inherently don't have a tense. they are just a way people perceive (thus inherently 'in the present') but it's only through some connection with thinking that they are extrapolated into the past or future.
wow neat
💙