I would pick the 86-89 version of Tyson to beat any version of Clay/Ali. People tend to compare Tyson to Frazier, but this is not so. I dont see much of a comparison, as they had different styles and techniques. Although Joe had a heart of stone, and an undeniable will to win I believe Mike to be better in every way.
Mike is top ten at best. Ali beat the best of the best in the absolute best era or all time with Parkinson's, biggest name under mikes resume is probably a 40 year old Holmes
It's not much of a contest. Ali had the hand & footspeed, reflexes, defensive brilliance, ring IQ and indominable will and toughness. Mike was great but not at Ali's level.
@@OzWorldSports well its 3 reasons. 1 you couldnt knock him out. 2 one of the best trainers of all time who trained holyfield said not only did he have hardest puch ever but he could also beat tyson ans ali. I even heard ali say rocky would have givin him a hard time.
@@gianni9046 Marciano was 185lbs. He was knocked down by guys who didn't hit nearly as hard as Tyson and was also lot's faster than Rocky. Ali's speed, and skills were like nothing Marciano ever saw. Add to that that Ali fought in what is called the golden era. The most completive era in heavyweight history
Muhammad Ali vs Mike Tyson; who do you think is the GOAT of heavyweight boxing?
I would pick the 86-89 version of Tyson to beat any version of Clay/Ali.
People tend to compare Tyson to Frazier, but this is not so. I dont see much of a comparison, as they had different styles and techniques. Although Joe had a heart of stone, and an undeniable will to win I believe Mike to be better in every way.
Good points
for me as long as Ali finds a way to out smart Tyson, Ali wins but if he doesn't Tyson wins
Yes
Neither. It's Joe Louis.
But between Ali and Tyson, Ali is undeniably greater.
What is your #1 reason for Louis
Ali for me personally ngl
What is your #1 reason
Mike is top ten at best. Ali beat the best of the best in the absolute best era or all time with Parkinson's, biggest name under mikes resume is probably a 40 year old Holmes
Mike had a hard time with Tony Tucker.
Ali, in his real prime, would have won.
Ali imo
What’s your #1 reason
It's not much of a contest. Ali had the hand & footspeed, reflexes, defensive brilliance, ring IQ and indominable will and toughness. Mike was great but
not at Ali's level.
Good stuff
Dumbest topic ever that's been repeated for years by everyone.. Tyson kills Ali.. anyone even with the smallest IQ of boxing knows that..
What is your #1 reason
😂
Mike Tyson isn't even top 10.
What is your reason
His reasoning is that he's an idiot who knows nothing about boxing.
ROCKY MARCIANO!
What is your #1 reason
@@OzWorldSports well its 3 reasons. 1 you couldnt knock him out. 2 one of the best trainers of all time who trained holyfield said not only did he have hardest puch ever but he could also beat tyson ans ali. I even heard ali say rocky would have givin him a hard time.
oh forgot to mention he was 49-0
@@gianni9046 Marciano was 185lbs. He was knocked down by guys who didn't hit nearly as hard as Tyson and was also lot's faster than Rocky. Ali's speed,
and skills were like nothing Marciano ever saw. Add to that that Ali fought in what is called the golden era. The most completive era in heavyweight history