I believe the Kyosho is best overall. The comparison doesn't touch a few very important aspects ofthe Kyosho. 1st of all the A-pillar (on the side of the windscreen) is correctly curved on the Kyosho, while on the Autoart they reproduced it as a much simpler straight line. It's just a mistake by Autoart. Then there is the side air intake which is much better made on the Kyosho. As for the wheels. Those on the Kyosho have the inflating valve, and it's actually a separate piece, I believe it's actually a metal part. Then we could talk about the fact that the Kyosho has working suspensions, and the air outlet on the passenger side on the front clamshell can be opend to reveal the fuel filler cap. These days seems like everything Autoart must be better than any Kyosho, but it's really not the case, and that's especially true on the Miura P 400 and SV by Kyosho. But I could say the same about the 911 2.7 RS by Minichamps which is a better model than the 911 2.7 RS by Autoart.
Usually I find the body shape of Kyosho's to be weaker than autoart, but in this case it's shape was actually pretty accurate to the actual car. I still find autoart's body details to be a bit more refined, but Kyosho always nails it with the details especially the interior.
I've got a used kyosho (never thought I'd get an expensive looking model like that for a good price (100CAD ≈ 80USD). Wheels are maybe a smidge too much inside fenders, and fender lips are missing, but then you get movable lashes (even more refined) to access the oil without opening the hood, you get generic kyosho michelin tyres that are sooo crisp, realistic photo-etched steering wheel, etc... I mean. Both models are gems.
I have both models. They are great replicas. The problem with the kyosho is the slightly higher rear grille. I also don't think it's 100% correct in the autoart. In some details one is better than the other. However, in things as important as the wheels/rims (level of detail, chrome), door openings and grilles or the general line of the car (bodywork, design), the kyosho is superior, it´s better. The paint treatment is somewhat better in the autoart. However, inside, both in terms of details, quality of materials or fidelity, kyosho clearly wins!! No doubt! Overall, if I could only choose one, I'd go with the kyosho. It is better adding all the sections or points and those that I consider to be the most important in the car.
Kyoshos rims have slightly more detail / shading. I also like Kyoshos tire tread pattern. And as others mentioned, seatbelts. Otherwise Autoart in all other instances. Why did you buy both lol
The Kyosho in this video belongs to my friend but meanwhile, I have actually gotten myself a Kyosho Miura SV in red/orange and gold. I might do a video on that one in the future :) Also I agree with you!
I think the Kyosho is better in some areas and the AUTOart in other areas. I've got 2 Kyosho Miura in my collection and have had 6 different versions :) Great video as always!
Yes. Kyosho has the correct 27 slats on the front grill, but the rear grill under the tail lights is too tall. (Depends on what full scale car they used for reference though. Some restorers unfortunately have a close enough good enough mentality and Kyosho may have dutifully coppied an errant restoration. (I give credit to Kyosho for putting the Urraco out in 1/18 though. Thanks, but please finish the V-8 line of cars!)
If you took the best of both models and combined them you would have the perfect model. Kyosho has the best enterior. AutoArt more refined detail. Video is easier to watch with the Mute button actuated. Dreadful music.
Me sorprende que ambas piezas al unirlas por mitad como en el video coinciden de manera muy similar, lo que indica que son replicas increíbles al modelo real!
Dear Diecast Fanatic, I haven't been able to comment on your wonderful videos. I have been busy with fam and school. I am here to apologize, i feel guilty.
Hahaha bro, I forgive you! I've considered using the instrumental of Roll In Peace before, and now that you mention it I will definitely use it in my next video ;)
I believe the Kyosho is best overall. The comparison doesn't touch a few very important aspects ofthe Kyosho. 1st of all the A-pillar (on the side of the windscreen) is correctly curved on the Kyosho, while on the Autoart they reproduced it as a much simpler straight line. It's just a mistake by Autoart. Then there is the side air intake which is much better made on the Kyosho. As for the wheels. Those on the Kyosho have the inflating valve, and it's actually a separate piece, I believe it's actually a metal part. Then we could talk about the fact that the Kyosho has working suspensions, and the air outlet on the passenger side on the front clamshell can be opend to reveal the fuel filler cap. These days seems like everything Autoart must be better than any Kyosho, but it's really not the case, and that's especially true on the Miura P 400 and SV by Kyosho. But I could say the same about the 911 2.7 RS by Minichamps which is a better model than the 911 2.7 RS by Autoart.
Surprised the Kyosho had seatbelts while the AutoArt did not.
In the real thing, there are no seatbelts. They were never created at that time.
@@toyotasupra1990 it should not have a roof ariel either.
Usually I find the body shape of Kyosho's to be weaker than autoart, but in this case it's shape was actually pretty accurate to the actual car. I still find autoart's body details to be a bit more refined, but Kyosho always nails it with the details especially the interior.
right on. that says all, I think. your last sentence sums it all, objectively.
I've got a used kyosho (never thought I'd get an expensive looking model like that for a good price (100CAD ≈ 80USD). Wheels are maybe a smidge too much inside fenders, and fender lips are missing, but then you get movable lashes (even more refined) to access the oil without opening the hood, you get generic kyosho michelin tyres that are sooo crisp, realistic photo-etched steering wheel, etc... I mean. Both models are gems.
AutoArt is always the most accurate models on the market at their price point! I own this model. Beautifully engineered. Great value for the money.
Kyosho, because it's the only brand that has it on green, my favourite colour for the Miura
Autoart forever, Kyosho no esta nada mal por su precio, ambas opciones son muy buenas.
I have both models. They are great replicas.
The problem with the kyosho is the slightly higher rear grille. I also don't think it's 100% correct in the autoart. In some details one is better than the other. However, in things as important as the wheels/rims (level of detail, chrome), door openings and grilles or the general line of the car (bodywork, design), the kyosho is superior, it´s better. The paint treatment is somewhat better in the autoart. However, inside, both in terms of details, quality of materials or fidelity, kyosho clearly wins!! No doubt!
Overall, if I could only choose one, I'd go with the kyosho. It is better adding all the sections or points and those that I consider to be the most important in the car.
Definitely Autoart. I have it in red.
I agree, I believe the Aa is better too
Yestercars..NOW I HAVE THE RED ,..AUTOart !?! ,..HA Ha ha a a
Kyosho & Autoart. They Are the best!!!
Kyosho's interior was better
Auto art's exterior was better
Both are value for money depends upon you that you want interior to be better or exterior
Kyoshos rims have slightly more detail / shading. I also like Kyoshos tire tread pattern. And as others mentioned, seatbelts. Otherwise Autoart in all other instances. Why did you buy both lol
The Kyosho in this video belongs to my friend but meanwhile, I have actually gotten myself a Kyosho Miura SV in red/orange and gold. I might do a video on that one in the future :) Also I agree with you!
@@TheDiecastFanatic I have the same blood orange / gold. It’s fantastic!
Autoart is the clear winner but Miura is such a beautiful car that I would be extremely happy with either model
I think the Kyosho is better in some areas and the AUTOart in other areas. I've got 2 Kyosho Miura in my collection and have had 6 different versions :) Great video as always!
Yes. Kyosho has the correct 27 slats on the front grill, but the rear grill under the tail lights is too tall. (Depends on what full scale car they used for reference though. Some restorers unfortunately have a close enough good enough mentality and Kyosho may have dutifully coppied an errant restoration. (I give credit to Kyosho for putting the Urraco out in 1/18 though. Thanks, but please finish the V-8 line of cars!)
@@jpatt1000 I have the Urraco, desperately need the Jalpa and Silhouette to go with it
Kyosho did a better job for the interior, that’s it
advantages and drawbacks to both.... Kyosho has more details in some places and the autoart has more in others...
both are fantastic, good to own both
I am an Autoart fan but koyosho held it's own here it's dead even but koyosho might have the slightly better interior
If the kyosho paint was on the autoart it would be perfect the pasty ish orange is more lamborghinish to me than more deep orange
Brandon Peterson True
Exactly
Autoart is better for the details, but i think the Kyosho colour is more similar to the real...
If you took the best of both models and combined them you would have the perfect model. Kyosho has the best enterior. AutoArt more refined detail. Video is easier to watch with the Mute button actuated. Dreadful music.
~On days like these~
Me sorprende que ambas piezas al unirlas por mitad como en el video coinciden de manera muy similar, lo que indica que son replicas increíbles al modelo real!
I like both of them.
İ Want Both Of Them
Muy buen vídeo. AUTOart me pareció mejor 👍👍
I WANT M
KYOSHO
I mean autoart
Kyosho made the best Miura and sv.
kyosho is the best
Both is fancy
Towards the end I forgot which side was which
Its 50/50 belts on kyosho. Light bulbs Autoart.
Autoart, but the Kyosho has the better interior....
My favorite is AUTOart!
Kyosho is better!!
Olha a minha eu tenho uma da uma olhada lá pea você ver os detalhes
kyosho that car better
AutoArt, sin duda alguna
Dear Diecast Fanatic,
I haven't been able to comment on your wonderful videos. I have been busy with fam and school. I am here to apologize, i feel guilty.
And i really think u should use a instrumental of Roll in peace
Hahaha bro, I forgive you! I've considered using the instrumental of Roll In Peace before, and now that you mention it I will definitely use it in my next video ;)
The Diecast Fanatic.... Thx, Have a nice day😉😀
Kyosho
AUTOART GÜZEL BEN ONU SEVİYORUM
Yestercars..NOW I HAVE THE RED ,..AUTOart !?! ,..HA Ha ha a a
Autoart
U can see the curvs with autoart.
thats meeee 😄😄😄
MELDE GAWD Hope it's ok to use 🤔? Love your stuff and credited you in the description and I'm not earning from this 🔥💯😁
yes I said nothing thank you guy ^_^
Cool video....want more you be subbed..see you in the web
Autoart!!!!! I have a Kyosho Porsche 911 Carrera. The car is not made at all well. The curve that descends from the roof makes you cry.
Why talk about Porsche models if video is about Miura?
@@barondegil1 I expressed my preference .... "Autoart". Then I added a personal comment. What is the problem?
@@Frank-72 Nothing. It’s just that your comment looks like you want to say that Kyosho is bad. Buy good Kyosho model, not crooked 911.
Kyosho ferraris are like that to . The f40 and 355 are annoyingly innacurate shapes . Countach to
#YesterCars #YesterToys ,..OW w w w )))) ,..I HAVE THE BIG REDBULL AUTOART ,..HA Ha a a a !?!
Definitely Autoart and on the kyosho models nothing opens(doors etc.)
There you’re mistaken with the resin Kyosho/GT Spirit version of the miura. On This one can be opened everything as well as on the Autoart one can.
AUTOart:)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's a draw.
Yes, son. It's a draw.
AUTOART BETTER
muy parejo
kyosho