In both the Google I/O presentation this morning, as well as the Nvidia presentation earlier this year, there was a mention of "Privacy". That when a user communicates with a hyper-scale AI platform, their query and answer WOULD NOT be used to train the system. But reading through the updated privacy policies, term & conditions, it seems this is not true. Which begs the question, why would anyone want to use these platforms if their "patterns" are being captured, and used to manipulate the user?
I'm curious about two things. Aren't these projects for startups, not Google? We expect Google to build AI, and startups to focus on case studies, not the other way around. Also, hasn't Google lost its purpose? They were a search company, but as search declines, they seem lost, building AI apps to stay relevant. Companies like OpenAI (Which is not Open anymore) have a clear mission "better AI" like Google's original "better search." It's sad to see Google, a favorite company of mine take this path. What do u think? I am happy to be wrong.
I think these companies are trying to become "platforms" who can do everything! I agree with you. I am more interested in their developer keynote (ruclips.net/video/ddcZnW1HKUY/видео.html) watching now and have a bit more hope there :)
@@engineerprompt I totally agree. Both Google and Microsoft aim to become platforms but take different approaches. Microsoft invests in AI startups, which is more startup-friendly. Google tries to build everything itself, like their unified Vertex AI model. This reminds me of Microsoft's earlier .NET platform approach. Now, Microsoft buys companies with their own methods, like OpenAI. Both want to be platforms, but they have different strategies.
lol very surface-level use cases that have been done as side projects many months ago when agentic architectures came out. unfortunately nothing that caught my attention
after i told my boss this his smiling really big, i mean Really Big Smile! do you know what that smiles means? i never see him smiling, especially on my payday....
![Tee Grizzley - Blow for Blow (feat. J. Cole) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wNLN5xsx5dc/mqdefault.jpg)
In both the Google I/O presentation this morning, as well as the Nvidia presentation earlier this year, there was a mention of "Privacy". That when a user communicates with a hyper-scale AI platform, their query and answer WOULD NOT be used to train the system. But reading through the updated privacy policies, term & conditions, it seems this is not true. Which begs the question, why would anyone want to use these platforms if their "patterns" are being captured, and used to manipulate the user?
I'm curious about two things. Aren't these projects for startups, not Google? We expect Google to build AI, and startups to focus on case studies, not the other way around. Also, hasn't Google lost its purpose? They were a search company, but as search declines, they seem lost, building AI apps to stay relevant. Companies like OpenAI (Which is not Open anymore) have a clear mission "better AI" like Google's original "better search." It's sad to see Google, a favorite company of mine take this path. What do u think? I am happy to be wrong.
I think these companies are trying to become "platforms" who can do everything! I agree with you. I am more interested in their developer keynote (ruclips.net/video/ddcZnW1HKUY/видео.html) watching now and have a bit more hope there :)
@@engineerprompt I totally agree. Both Google and Microsoft aim to become platforms but take different approaches. Microsoft invests in AI startups, which is more startup-friendly. Google tries to build everything itself, like their unified Vertex AI model. This reminds me of Microsoft's earlier .NET platform approach. Now, Microsoft buys companies with their own methods, like OpenAI. Both want to be platforms, but they have different strategies.
What a bunch of nonsense.
Thanks! Good summary
can I pay google for product placement in gemini yet?.
May be soon :)
lol very surface-level use cases that have been done as side projects many months ago when agentic architectures came out. unfortunately nothing that caught my attention
after i told my boss this his smiling really big, i mean Really Big Smile! do you know what that smiles means? i never see him smiling, especially on my payday....
lol!!!! Google a boomer trying to fit in Alpha generation somehow