Political media's bias, in a single chart
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 дек 2018
- Vanessa Otero set out to rank an ever-growing partisan media landscape, with the belief that an informed public is a better public.
Learn more about this story at www.newsy.com/86501/
Find more videos like this at www.newsy.com
Follow Newsy on Facebook: / newsyvideos
Follow Newsy on Twitter: / newsy
CNN isn't biased. I just read a CNN piece that said they weren't biased.
Trendy YB umm issa joke
Sure bro.
That’s what biased media would want you to hear
How do you know they're not lying about that
Trendy YB wooosh
ABC, NBC, CNN, Bloomberg, and CBS ranked as "neutral" LMAOOOOO
I was laughing when she made the CHART hahahaha
All of them have a common leftist board controlling their content
Yeah the left keep telling the truth and pissing off the fake news right,what a bummer for the fascist Qanidiots.
Chart shows CNN is in leans left AND pretty low quality. Seems your bias did not allow you to see that
@@sigmasix3719 hmm have you seen too much neutral news lately?
2 years later...the amount of damage the media has done is HUGE!
Yeah, the damage right-wing media has done.
@@death2damari Comment kept it neutral, but you decided to start pointing fingers. I hate to break to you, but speaking from an international perspective, left-wing media is far worse.
@@death2damari You literally brought in the extreme bias they talked about in the video.
The left has backing from the satanic temple. Enough said!
@@AttitudeforQA Ratio. Exposes the kind of people this channel attracts.
This is quite possibly the most inaccurate,biased chart I've ever seen.
I was thinking the same thing. Looks like "my (liberal) opinions on the news"
I'm sure CNN, CBS, NBC, ETC ETC ETC have produced even more inaccurate biased graphics, but I'm not going to subject myself to that kind of torture to verify.
The fact that she puts CNN neutral when all they talk about is how bad conservatives are tells me that she is a liberal.
As someone who is pretty far left CNN is definitely close to the center. Republicans especially Trump aren't really that hard to dislike.
Riley Ellsworth Trump is certainly an idiot and possibly senile, but at least he isn’t as mental as democrats like the mayor of Seattle or some far right republicans like the Infowars Guy.
@@rileyellsworth575 Since you're a far left, that doesn't sound believable
CNN is obviously bias. I can't stand Trump by the way, but you can see the bias.
Riley Ellsworth nope
rating CNN as neutral says it all
It doesn't set CNN to neutral. It says CNN is left leaning, and often provide more opinion over fact.
No they are in the left leaning position
@@drrd4127 Look, the graph has two dimensions. The x-axis indicates left / right bias, and the y-axis indicates factual quality. CNN is clearly a ways down from the top, indicating they use a lot of subjective opinion and analysis in their reporting.
Dot-dot-dot some people will literally complain about anything. How about you come up with your own chart then. And then burn it, since you're obviously biased. As other commenters have pointed out it clearly has CNN and The slightly left-leaning but more opinionated position
@@drrd4127 Dude, they are SLIGHTLY left in that graph. Nowhere NEAR how left leaning CNN really is.
And then she has OAN as Hyper partisan Right. Freaking insanity. This woman is a far left liberal showing HER bias.
Wow she seem so confident, she could slide right into Facebook as a “fact checker”
And Twitter and Georg Sores as extreme left.
Very skanky looking girl, though
@@Watcher6868 damn...
How many have you boned?
Soros' "factchecker" sites and Facebook can be classified as Pravda equivalent.
Her chart has AP news as neutral which was FALSE .
This seems influenced by bias as it is only a singular person. I think that we could use a statistical sample to choose rankings too
If you go to the site, you will learn that each source's rankings is an average of several headlining articles from that source. Each article is evaluated by a trip--one conservative, one moderate, and one liberal. They must come to a consensus on where to place an article for a source on both the horizontal and vertical axes.
@@staceywright7294 Thank you. Sourcing takes more time than speculation.
Even this is biased lmao
their methodology is explained in full. Its based on an academic framework www.adfontesmedia.com/
Okay, this is going to be long but it explains how the research was done and why we see the results as faulty.
So, the methodology used disengages bias by incorporating the use of computers to scan and categorize specific words/phrases, which have been scientifically validated, as left or right leaning. They also had the computer programmed to evaluate the use of opinion based lexicon and fact based lexicon in each headline/report. Continuing, those numbers were then tabulated with use of statistical programming. Giving us the results we see.
So now let me explain and give an example of why it seems to us that the sites are more biased than what this chart shows-
If the numbers showed that a site where people gather their news had 45 articles with right leaning lexicon and 53 with left leaning lexicon, that would place that site slightly left of center but still in the neutral area because the percentage breakdown is 54% left and, 46% right leaning. Now note the numerical differences between 45 and 53. That is 8. Not a big number right? Well now let’s make those numbers more realistic. Let’s say we multiply that 45 and 53 by 1000, making 45,000 right and 53,000 left leaning. That difference is now 8,000. Much more significant, right? However 53,000 is still 54% and 45,000 is still 46%, making the site just slightly left leaning but still neutral. However to the consumer, 8,000 biased articles is still HUGE. (Keep in mind, we cannot consume all 98,000 articles on a site, so we cherry pick what interests us most. If someone is left leaning, they will share left leaning articles that prove their point, typically from a site that they can find articles that support their viewpoint easier, such as Buzzfeed. They won’t share the right leaning articles. This then creates the illusion to the public that a site is more biased than what it appears.
Does this make sense?
So long story short, the graph is accurate but our perspective of reality can make it seem incorrect.
how could it not be.. at some point assumptions have to be made its inherent.
@@karapankratz So at best it completely misrepresents everything by averaging things out. This is why I reject using a computer to analyse this stuff. Maybe a station is overall unbiased for your everyday talking point. But get into something like the 2020 elections and this goes right out the window and all the stations put on their colours and tell us who to vote for.
any thing to the left of info wars and alex jones is leftist commie shit
Vox is "most reliable" omg.. my sides.
VOX on this chart is shown are almost hyper partisan and they are not at the top with the best sources. Maybe your bias is blinding you?
@@debateme9204 dude even at the top, are totally bias hahaha
I’m a lefty, thats LOL FUNNY
Get some glasses. They aren’t even in the green box
All the RUclips professionals showing they can't even read a basic chart, lmao
These media-bias charts tend to be complete and utter shit.
Source?
That chart is one of the most ridiculous things I have seen lately🤣🤣🤣
Why though? Because your outlet was shown to be low on the chart?
Perhaps you're further from center than you realize.
Looking at this chart I can see where her bias is
Stupid naive GenX/early millennial loser she is. Californians, a bunch of liberal zombies when it comes to voting. Assuming she’s from there. She straight up ranks news organisations on her bullshit chart solely according to what the NYT’s has to say about them. Typical though.
Right! How is CNN so close to the middle???
@@joshuat20k Indeed, CNN should be completely to the furthest left of the chart. Lol
@@joynelbonetdelgado4952
You're deluding yourself...
FD S yeah theses people are spewing nonsense lmao. Acting like CNN endorses Soviet communism... how delusional lol.
Was going to watch this, then saw that they scored CNN as "neutral"...moving on...
no if you saw the actually chart cnn when more on the left.
Robin Yu you have to be a dumbass to think that CNN isn’t bias
CNN should be WAY to the left. CBS is way too far to the right as well.
@Robin Yu No, he saw a bullshit video with LEFT biased media in the neutral zone, and it is a blatant lie proven by a 2014 Harvard study on the media's bias. You're just too woke.
@Robin Yu No, he saw a bullshit video with LEFT biased media in the neutral zone, and it is a blatant lie proven by a 2014 Harvard study on the media's bias. You're just too woke.
I didn’t even vote trump either time but he is completely right saying this is a toxic swamp that needs to be drained
Or, euphemism aside, it's an insane death cult that needs to be abolished.
@@calysagora3615 动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Tibet 六四天安門事件 The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 天安門大屠殺 The Tiananmen Square Massacre 反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Rightist Struggle 大躍進政策 The Great Leap Forward 文化大革命 The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution 人權 Human Rights 民運 Democratization 自由 Freedom 獨立 Independence 多黨制 Multi-party system 台灣 臺灣 Taiwan Formosa 中華民國 Republic of China 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 Tibet 達賴喇嘛 Dalai Lama 法輪功 Falun Dafa 新疆維吾爾自治區 The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 諾貝爾和平獎 Nobel Peace Prize 劉暁波 Liu Xiaobo 民主 言論 思想 反共 反革命 抗議 運動 騷亂 暴亂 騷擾 擾亂 抗暴 平反 維權 示威游行 李洪志 法輪大法 大法弟子 強制斷種 強制堕胎 民族淨化 人體實驗 肅清 胡耀邦 趙紫陽 魏京生 王丹 還政於民 和平演變 激流中國 北京之春 大紀元時報 九評論共産黨 獨裁 專制 壓制 統一 監視 鎮壓 迫害 侵略 掠奪 破壞 拷問 屠殺 活摘器官 誘拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 六合彩 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Winnie the Pooh 劉曉波动态网自由门
@@calysagora3615 动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Tibet 六四天安門事件 The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 天安門大屠殺 The Tiananmen Square Massacre 反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Rightist Struggle 大躍進政策 The Great Leap Forward 文化大革命 The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution 人權 Human Rights 民運 Democratization 自由 Freedom 獨立 Independence 多黨制 Multi-party system 台灣 臺灣 Taiwan Formosa 中華民國 Republic of China 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 Tibet 達賴喇嘛 Dalai Lama 法輪功 Falun Dafa 新疆維吾爾自治區 The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 諾貝爾和平獎 Nobel Peace Prize 劉暁波 Liu Xiaobo 民主 言論 思想 反共 反革命 抗議 運動 騷亂 暴亂 騷擾 擾亂 抗暴 平反 維權 示威游行 李洪志 法輪大法 大法弟子 強制斷種 強制堕胎 民族淨化 人體實驗 肅清 胡耀邦 趙紫陽 魏京生 王丹 還政於民 和平演變 激流中國 北京之春 大紀元時報 九評論共産黨 獨裁 專制 壓制 統一 監視 鎮壓 迫害 侵略 掠奪 破壞 拷問 屠殺 活摘器官 誘拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 六合彩 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Winnie the Pooh 劉曉波动态网自由门
the swamp is filled with conservatives and trumpists.
According to her chart we are supposed to believe that NPR and AP are almost entirely fact based and have virtually no bias. What a joke.
Ah yes Bloomberg. CNN are neutral. I was smoking the same thing as the person who wrote this garbage.
Copy and Pasted from another reply (trying to spread the word!)
Okay, this is going to be long but it explains how the research was done and why we see the results as faulty.
So, the methodology used disengages bias by incorporating the use of computers to scan and categorize specific words/phrases, which have been scientifically validated, as left or right-leaning. They also had the computer programmed to evaluate the use of opinion based lexicon and fact-based lexicon in each headline/report. Continuing, those numbers were then tabulated with the use of statistical programming. Giving us the results we see.
So now let me explain and give an example of why it seems to us that the sites are more biased than what this chart shows-
If the numbers showed that a site where people gather their news had 45 articles with right-leaning lexicon and 53 with left-leaning lexicon, that would place that site slightly left of center but still in the neutral area because the percentage breakdown is 54% left and, 46% right-leaning. Now note the numerical differences between 45 and 53. That is 8. Not a big number right? Well now let’s make those numbers more realistic. Let’s say we multiply that 45 and 53 by 1000, making 45,000 right and 53,000 left-leaning. That difference is now 8,000. Much more significant, right? However 53,000 is still 54% and 45,000 is still 46%, making the site just slightly left-leaning but still neutral. However, to the consumer, 8,000 biased articles is still HUGE. (Keep in mind, we cannot consume all 98,000 articles on a site, so we cherry-pick what interests us most. If someone is left-leaning, they will share left-leaning articles that prove their point, typically from a site that they can find articles that support their viewpoint easier, such as Buzzfeed. They won’t share the right-leaning articles. This then creates the illusion to the public that a site is more biased than what it appears.
Does this make sense?
So long story short, the graph is accurate but our perspective of reality can make it seem incorrect.
OAN is neutral then
Lol CNN is in the wrong fucking place
Lol cnn is not neutral
@@selfpromotionpolice9543 long story short. You are basing Article counts is flawed. It should be based on number of views and length of stay per article. In all accounts this is biased and flawed. Also it would be interesting to see what constitutes as left-right leaning terminology. That I would find fascinating. Because CNN is by no means a neutral outlet. They are by far radical left. To have them before MSNBC is appalling. Dont feed us this garbage.
Also it is funny how the major conservative outlets rated so low on quality. Utterly amazing. Ya this was clearly biased programming/manipulation of data.
Yeah, she's a lil' soft on the left.
Found a capitalist.
@@Rikai644 whats wrong with being and working in a system that hasn't led to the death of more that 40 million people due to starvation?
@@FirstnameLastname77777 Fine, I will quit politics.
@@Rikai644 you seem frustrated by me but thats an assumption because I don't know what you're actually thinking i welcome you to have a non toxic conversation with me...
@@FirstnameLastname77777 I support capitalism as long as they did not oppress the working class.
“The corruption in reporting starts very early. It's like the police reporting on the police.” - Julian Assange
Sometimes when I’m upset or feeing down I come back to watch this video to make me feel better like I’m not an idiot like the people in this video are
Yeah you but what about them?
ay the waste of brain...
That’s good stuff! 😂
If you are a conservative, you are not an idiot. You are a demon.
Not accurate. Not even close.
Please give a link to a more accurate source. Thanks in anticipation!!
@Folk Aart Again: please simply give us a link or two to sources which you consider to be more accurate and closer to easily-verifiable reality: back up your claims if you can. Thanks in anticipation!
@@jerrystickman3343 does it say how factual the news outlets are? All I'm seeing is how far they lean politically.
Okay, this is going to be long but it explains how the research was done and why we see the results as faulty.
So, the methodology used disengages bias by incorporating the use of computers to scan and categorize specific words/phrases, which have been scientifically validated, as left or right leaning. They also had the computer programmed to evaluate the use of opinion based lexicon and fact based lexicon in each headline/report. Continuing, those numbers were then tabulated with use of statistical programming. Giving us the results we see.
So now let me explain and give an example of why it seems to us that the sites are more biased than what this chart shows-
If the numbers showed that a site where people gather their news had 45 articles with right leaning lexicon and 53 with left leaning lexicon, that would place that site slightly left of center but still in the neutral area because the percentage breakdown is 54% left and, 46% right leaning. Now note the numerical differences between 45 and 53. That is 8. Not a big number right? Well now let’s make those numbers more realistic. Let’s say we multiply that 45 and 53 by 1000, making 45,000 right and 53,000 left leaning. That difference is now 8,000. Much more significant, right? However 53,000 is still 54% and 45,000 is still 46%, making the site just slightly left leaning but still neutral. However to the consumer, 8,000 biased articles is still HUGE. (Keep in mind, we cannot consume all 98,000 articles on a site, so we cherry pick what interests us most. If someone is left leaning, they will share left leaning articles that prove their point, typically from a site that they can find articles that support their viewpoint easier, such as Buzzfeed. They won’t share the right leaning articles. This then creates the illusion to the public that a site is more biased than what it appears.
Does this make sense?
So long story short, the graph is accurate but our perspective of reality can make it seem incorrect.
@@jerrystickman3343 Sorry, but seeing anything shown as CNN being a reliable trust worthy source, loses credibility right away.
I saw the chart and CNN was sitting pretty smack dab in the middle. That alone screams... it’s just wow
It scews left on the chart. Not the Neutral ground. And its closer to the bottom for quality too.
Someone didn’t watch the video. CNN is way at the bottom and skews left. Stop being stupid.
@@harmonium86 yes but it's still not far enough to the left, if you don't realize that then their brainwashing probably worked on you
@@alexbrewer8592 how'd you arrive at this conclusion?
The thing is that of corporate media doesn’t have a left or right bias, but a bias toward the political establishment. Most tow the line of the Democratic Party, though of course there are exceptions like Fox. This has the effect of making these outlets neoliberal in their tendencies. Neoliberalism is an economically right wing position while at the same time remaining culturally progressive, and tends to favor of state power. Since economics is arguably more important than social issues, I would actually say that it fair to characterize corporate media as right-leaning.
This woman probably isn't the one to be trusted to do it, but it would also be interesting to see a chart with a "reported news", "reported opinion as news", "reported outright lies as news", and "didn't report news that should have been reported" categories. For that you'll need more room to the left of centerline.
Vanessa, I so appreciate that you did this and I was in hopes that you would update us on your latest progress. I was searching to see if NPR (PBS) was bias before supporting them and now I see that they are among the top ones and a little left but not bad. I wonder if that has changed in 4 years? Please give us an updated chart! Excellent idea and great chart & graphing ideas. We, the people, need this. A trusted source. 🙏🏻
The Neutral zone is all messed up. A lot of them don't belong there.
That’s definitely bias of you to say.
mediabiasfactcheck.com/cnn/ I guess not but the dumb thing is y’all are focusing on the zones rather than the fact checking meter. CNN may be in that neural zone but it is definitely not marked as the most reliable resource. That should be the trigger.
@RJ DA Hear me out since a RUclips comment is going to change your opinion, we know CNN is biased and they probably should've put that more left, BUT it is definitely leaning to the bottom of the graph. There are 2 points, the x, and a y.
No one belongs in the middle. Neutral sources is a myth.
Said the totally not biased riech whinge idiot. Its based on the language used, which shows empirically that CNN is NOT left wing but centrist, but the Republiklan needs this strawman in order to keep the Overton window within that definition, so these comments are simply proving that media overall does have a right wing bias, and the people that fall for it not only cannot articulate a coherent or astute argument, but instead rely on declarations and feelings posited as if facts. Which is gaslighting, and a sure sign someone has been subjected to emotive based propaganda programs
" What is the cost of lies? It’s not that we’ll mistake them for the truth. The real danger is that if we hear enough lies, then we no longer recognize the truth at all."
~ Valery Legasov
Especially well-funded lies.
Not good, not terrible.
I watch bits of Fox occasionally to round out my perspective, they have completely given up on even trying to be truthful and unbiased
My liberal brother said he wants unbiased news, so he listens to NPR. I almost fell off my chair.
What we need is an unbiased media bias chart.
The fact she has the CNN logo even remotely near the "Neutral" zone (let alone being almost half way in it) completely discredits this chart.
No it doesn't. They're center-left. This is an important project. Fact analysis doesn't care about your opinions. Perhaps they simply analyze the stories and don't consider things like omissions and cherry picking. Right-wing media is far worse and even dangerous.
@@bumblebootwiddletoes5185 CNN Center Left? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!!!!!
How are they bias. Give examples
@@freddygarfunkle8947 All they did was trash trump, never complimenting any achievements and there where many. Meanwhile all we here is how great Biden is doing which is ironic because the country is doing terrible under Biden. Take your blinders off!
@@swiftaudi do you have examples?
This is about as accurate as hillary's 98% victory poll.
Made it 70 likes you didn’t deserve the 69 likes tbh
MSNBC is not neutral
Trump lost all elections.
That sounds like something who is far, far right would think.
@@user-zb9lv3gh8sthe term "far right" has lost all meaning in recent times
4 Years ago, this chart was disturbing, now the results could be terrifying indeed.
The fact that CNN and the Washington Post are not further on the left make me feel like this chart needs more work.
CNN slightly neutral.. gtfo
bruh fuck out of here. there a bunch of liberal bootlickers
If you think CNN is close to far left your a conservative NPC
CNN is corporate news network aka Clinton News Network aka establish/centrist left, status quo.
This biased bitch is gonna make a chart about how biased news sites are
Robert Carson i am scared of immigrants but the reason why is not what you think. If we keep importing low skilled uneducated South and middle Americans into US at an exponential rate, this country will begin to look like India before you know it. What happens when low skilled uneducated people become a majority? When AI replaces the need for low skilled labor, less and less attainable jobs become available and all of the sudden you have a majority of your population that have literally had the rug swept out from under them. What happens next? What happens next is those people vote and decide elections from now until America collapses. That’s why we’re a little concerned with mass immigration. It’s the death of diversity, not the other way around.
These people just put Ben Shapiro’s DAILY WIRE half on the extreme right and cnn is close to the center 😧 wtf yeah I think we know what kind of person made this 😂
They put the "AP" as neutral LOLOLOL.
What's wrong With Daily Wire?
Ben speaks facts not opinions 🤣
@@infinite088 I think that's what JH is saying . CNN is far left and while ben spits facts he does lean right.
@@infinite088 He says ‘facts’ confidently and quickly, without adequate sources to back up his conjectures. Where I come from, we call those opinions
@@chancellorpalpatine7486 what about youngboy
this aged really well.
What are her qualifications to judge bias?
"I made this using only my opinion and nobody else's to show you which stations are biased."
This screams bias just from that one sentence
@@ihyashh ikr
Actually she used a word counter, so it's nothing to do with her opinions or input, you obviously only heard what you wanted to, which is literally bias
100%
I have officially lost all faith in so called journalism I had a feeling for years but you guys really showed your cards lately. Beginning of the end
How long do you think you were lied to before you realized, “you were being lied to?”
Since I was 13 years old, my philosophy has been, “ One unpunished lie is all it takes to destroy the credibility of someone or some thing!
I also judge people! It’s called a, “Self preservation!”
Here’s the logic, would you allow a convicted child molester to be alone with your children?
The wrong kind of judging is if you were to presume anything about such a straightforward question.
The question itself is meant to wake up your senses!
Check out @John Stossel
Yeah, bias after bias, it’s so cringe.
Wall Street journal is great.
What happens when you turned journalism into a college degree..
watching this is like watching a jreg video except instead of being layered in irony its layered in bias
A few questions: what standard or measurement she used to determine the quality and delivery of each network? Did she take into account parent and child networks? Here is another factor: monetary contributions from Executives and VPs to political candidates?
She's using the ole Personal Bias Bigotry Standards most people use. Whatever she thinks is the Norm and anything to the right of that is Right Wing. Problem is she's obviously a Lefty so the middle is Left to her.
You ask: A few questions: what standard or measurement she used to determine the quality and delivery of each network? I answer: Ted Turners opinion, or who ever he has in charge & that person probably sent it to Turner for is approval.
Easy pleb. You are not supposed to question the reports.
I think this chart needs work . Her neutral candidates are questionable.
Is C-Span neutral?
They put the "AP" as neutral LOLOLOL.
I feel like vice should be near the top, it's almost only primary, stuff like this is peak journalism ruclips.net/video/Plqd8APvln0/видео.html
The founders of the CIA, FBI, DC and the designers of the Pentagon were all Catholic, so too Tucker Carlson, Beck, Hannity, Spicer, O'Reilly, Ingram, Pence, Hawley, Blasio, Manafort, Prince, Devos, Kavanuagh, Barrett, Gates, Fauci, Abbott, Manchin, Comey, Rogan, Jones, Dore, Kulinksi, Rubin, Pool, Peterson, Dice, Cernovich, Crowder, Molyneux, Fuentes, Yilanopouse, Pompeo, Spencer, Bolton, Abrams, Stone, DeVos, Bezos, Cuomo, Pelosi, Biden, Maddow, Hayes, Cooper, Rubio, Cruz, Mattis, Richardson, Ryan, Huckabee, Gingrich, Sessions, Guiliani, Flynn, Bannon, Barr, Christie, Melania, Comey, Johnson, May, Blair, Thatcher, Trudeau, Merkle, Tusk, Farage, Morgan, Cowell, Ventura, Bolsanaro, Putin, Posobiec, Corbett, Robinson, Woods, Icke, Camp, Duke, Kirk, Watson, Iverson, Ball, House, Jones. 7/9 Supreme Court Justices are Roman
Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, Trotsky, Orwell, Freud, Johnson, and Trump all come from Vienna Bavaria capital of the Holy Roman Empire. Pro life is a foundational Roman tenet.
*"But they want absolutely nothing but Palestine. Because Palestine constitutes the veritable center of world political power, the strategic military center for world control"*
Dr Nehum Goldmann
Benjamin Disraeli UK PM 1890, author of Odinism, the Nordic occult embraced by Hitler, and an open Isis worshipper, called for an "Aryan/Semitic alliance to create a superior caucasian race"
www.stitcher.com/show/investigate-joe-rogan/episode/investigating-mike-baker-77021771
Diligence co founded by Bush and Michael Baker. The management team includes: -Judge William Webster, ex-director of CIA and FBI -Nick Day, Royal Marine, and worked for MI5. Has done time in South African prison for bribes. -Trefor Williams, ex UK special forces.
wikispooks.com/wiki/Diligence
Bryan Callen's father Michael Callen's bio on Georgetown's worked in some powerful positions and rubbed elbows with powerful people. Also a member of the CFR. Rogan did mention once a long time ago that a close friend of his used to travel all around the world when he was younger, because of his father's job, only to later find out his father was in the C.I.A. Rogan never identified the friend, but i have listened to some of the things the Callen says and wondered if he was who Rogan was talking about.
What's more Snowden worked at Booz Allen Hamilton, owned by none other than Dov Zakheim, the Pentagon Comptroller on 911 who lost the 3 trillion dollars. The connections and webs are staggering, and all amount to a Russian Israeli infiltration of American politics, leading to the rise of Trump and his attempted fascist coup. They all call Russiagate a hoax, they also all "coincidentally" idolise Assange and Snowden, and they all downplay the fact half of govt was nearly executed on the Senate lawn
Snowden works for Dov Zakheim at Booz Allen Hamilton
www.haaretz.com/.premium-why-snowden-hasn-t-hurt-israeli-intel-1.5258241
www.jpost.com/international/edward-snowden-worlds-most-wanted-fugitive-appears-in-israel-571227
en.globes.co.il/en/article-nsa-whistleblower-edward-snowden-to-speak-in-israel-1001255928
www.timesofisrael.com/topic/edward-snowden/
Dov Zakheim, Pentagon Comptroller 911: missing 3 Trillion dollars
globalvision2000.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=158&pid=361
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dov_S._Zakheim
Dov Zakheim CEO of CPS: put hijack tech in AA fleet June 2001
www.indybay.org/newsitems/2007/12/16/18467275.php
www.washingtonpost.com/business/capitalbusiness/booz-ceo-snowden-was-not-a-booz-allen-person/2013/07/31/a349b51a-f9f6-11e2-8752-b41d7ed1f685_story.html
www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2016/10/05/booz-allen-hamilton-nsa-files-shadow-brokers/
www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/why-did-a-russian-pay-95m-to-buy-trumps-palm-beach-mansion/
amp.miamiherald.com/news/business/article135187364.html
www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/blackwater-founder-held-secret-seychelles-meeting-to-establish-trump-putin-back-channel/2017/04/03/95908a08-1648-11e7-ada0-1489b735b3a3_story.html
www.theguardian.com/media/2020/feb/19/donald-trump-offered-julian-assange-pardon-russia-hack-wikileaks
worldbulletin.dunyabulteni.net/m/article-comment/wikileaks-israel-connection-h66903.html
www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/11/the-secret-correspondence-between-donald-trump-jr-and-wikileaks/545738/
www.politico.com/news/2019/11/12/roger-stone-trial-wikileaks-069831
www.fastcompany.com/4017692/wikileaks-has-leaked-info-on-gay-men-in-saudi-arabia-which-has-the-death-penalty-for-homosexuality
sparktoro.com/blog/we-analyzed-every-twitter-account-following-donald-trump-61-are-bots-spam-inactive-or-propaganda/
The next morning, about 12 hours later, Trump Jr. responded to WikiLeaks. “Off the record I don’t know who that is, but I’ll ask around,” he wrote on September 21, 2016. “Thanks.”
The messages, obtained by The Atlantic, were also turned over by Trump Jr.’s lawyers to congressional investigators. They are part of a long-and largely one-sided-correspondence between WikiLeaks and the president’s son that continued until at least July 2017. The messages show WikiLeaks, a radical transparency organization that the American intelligence community believes was chosen by the Russian government to disseminate the information it had hacked, actively soliciting Trump Jr.’s cooperation. WikiLeaks made a series of increasingly bold requests, including asking for Trump’s tax returns, urging the Trump campaign on Election Day to reject the results of the election as rigged, and requesting that the president-elect tell Australia to appoint Julian Assange ambassador to the United States.
www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/11/the-secret-correspondence-between-donald-trump-jr-and-wikileaks/545738/
Even the *REPUBLICAN INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE CONFIRMED RUSSIAN HACKING*
"It is particularly striking that the committee’s Republicans signed onto this portion of the report, given the insistence by Trump and many Senate Republicans that Ukraine interfered in the 2015 election. Yet here are Republican senators, some of whom have even endorsed that theory, admitting that its origins lie in Russian disinformation."
Trump and senior Campaign officials sought to obtain advance information about WikiLeaks through Roger Stone. In spring 2016, prior to Assange's public announcements, Stone advised the Campaign that WikiLeaks would be releasing materials harmful to Clinton. Following the July 22 DNC release, Trump and the Campaign believed that Roger Stone had known of the release and had inside access to WikiLeaks, and repeatedly communicated with Stone about WikiLeaks throughout the summer and fall of 2016. Trump and other senior Campaign officials specifically directed Stone to obtain information about upcoming document releases relating to Clinton and report back. At their direction, Stone took action to gain inside knowledge for the Campaign and shared his purported knowledge directly with Trump and senior Campaign officials on multiple occasions. Trump and the Campaign believed that Stone had inside information and expressed satisfaction that Stone's information suggested more releases would be forthcoming.
www.lawfareblog.com/collusion-reading-diary-what-did-senate-intelligence-committee-find
"I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud." Julian Asange, Wikileaks, July 19 2010.
fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/alex-jones-admits-cia-family-connections/42683
ffwd.medium.com/all-of-youtube-not-just-the-algorithm-is-a-far-right-propaganda-machine-29b07b12430
www.au.org/church-state/september-2008-church-state/people-events/american-jews-don-t-support-christian-zionism
www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-poll-shows-support-for-israel-plummeting-among-u-s-liberals-millennials-and-women-1.6594182
@@mrcolz9373 it’s just a live feed of congress so yeah it’s very neutral
Maybe someone should create a chart that shows bias in people who create media bias charts.
I feel like some of the bigger news corporations on the Political Bias Chart pay to have themselves placed where they want to be seen on this chart.
That chart is a JOKE. Time literally just ran articles on why it's time for Socialism...
SmithN' Wesson We aren’t taking care of our citizens like other countries. Socialism isn’t the same as a social safety net. The latter provides more freedom.
We rank #58
www.businessinsider.com/countries-most-freedom-in-the-world-2018-4
AmandaBlondie007 Most Americans are completely clueless on the fact we actually have a MIXED economy. When you say “social” they think *COMMIE* . Yet we were one of the first countries to implement *public* education lmao
DA REAL Johnny Appleseed I know. We have gone further right for the couple of decades all in the name of free market capitalism.
Love this video that does a good job illustrating how we are getting screwed . . .
Video link forthcoming
Here is the link of free market capitalism vs social democracy.
ruclips.net/video/YKuRiigagkU/видео.html
Cough cough ppssst pppssst vote for Bernie. He’s a moderate in comparison to the rest of the world and his plans are already being done successfully all over the work. Poke poke nudge nudge. He’s not a sellout; overturn Citizens United; the 1% hate him. Time to give them the finger and pay up.
All over the world. Not work. LOL
When the study for biased news is biased
@Steve Plummer The creator literally said her chart reflects her own personal bias right there in the video you are commenting on. Casper's comment is 100% verifiable fact. I think that makes you the full of shit crackhead.
@@mattpatterson9496 based on the words she used, but the mechanism itself was not. Any human study ever is subject to bias, in fact there's very little in political science that could be considered otherwise.
It's like remarking that water is wet, and thinking that's some kind of "gotcha"
@@uncannyvalley2350 Sad that I have to point out that water is wet but that is the world we live in.
@@mattpatterson9496 sad that after all that you still said anything of merit, her whole team was biased too right, and you totally dont live in self affirming safe space. Care to break down the flaws in her research, can you show us yours?
Didn't think so 😗
@@uncannyvalley2350 You are confusing me. In your first comment you said "in fact there's very little in political science that could be considered" unbiased. Then you ask me to prove that this was not biased?
Well that aged badly
I wonder how this chart fairs today?!
One person's opinion is not an adequate measure of bias. Her method is not scientific, and her metrics are conjured up in her own mind; tainted by her own bias. Yawn.
@Christopher White yeah and most republicans know and understand that, you seem like you tear up if someone calls out cnn
Her method is pretty scientific, she explains some factors in the video. Certainly much more scientific than your armchair analysis.
@@davidmoser1103 scientific my ass
why? CNN is leftist but not as bad as FOX news is extreme
@@davidmoser1103 Scientific such as, Anyone can identify as a little Girl or a Big Black Woman if they feel like it that day. And you are a Anti-Science Bigot if you disagree.
Yeah the Right have never been big on Science, but you Lefties decided to create your own after destroying your party with Hypocrisy.
My Question is WHY? because remember your Science God Al Gore, Told you from his Personal jet and his 18 room mansion that the world is gonna end in 12 years and that time has already come and went.
Why are you still even Breathing. Surely you have to Support the Science on those Facts.. Or are you a Anti-Science Bigot...
Wish I could dislik this twice.
I have been after you tube for years to create a double dislike button
@Steve Plummer shh no need to burst their bubble
@Steve Plummer Only if you're a simpleton without the ability to analyze would you assume that the chart has any merit.
@Steve Plummer The irony is strong on this one bois
What is it with conservatives and disliking? Get a life and stop being an internet hater it’s so dumb
The only way she could have made this chart look almost symmetrical (balanced) is she only evaluates all the ads but not the contents of all the mainstream media. LOL
i love how this whole chart is nothing but a graph of her opinions, lol. I'm actually really hoping there will be a real version of this, it would need to be created by an even mix of those from the left and the right and a board of directors made up of the most moderate among them but a check put on them by admittedly partisan overseers from both sides. it would be a great project but very expensive.
She votes Democrat. Calling it right now.
You don't need to call it. I don't think anyone is doubting that at all.
Bought and paid for.
Ummm. and just what is wrong with voting for the political party that comes closest to your world view?
altareggo, Nothing wrong with voting for the political party that comes closest to your worldview. But if you're charting mainstream media political bias to be used to anchor your political views on accuracy in reporting, you either need to say your viewpoint leans toward The Left or The Right, or hire a broad range of fact checkers from differing political viewpoints.
It doesn't make the difference as long as her methodology is sound.
The chart is a load of bollocks!
Whoever made the chart is living in a state of denial...
Damn.......they must be in a pretty sad state, maybe Alaska or Mississippi
All I needed to do is pause this after a little over a minute to see CBS news touches the line at "skews right" and PBS and New York Times is high up on the list as "highest quality" sources for news. That's about the point in the video where she's informing us that all this reporting is splitting us apart. I suppose the answer in her mind is for one side to simply remain quiet while the other side exerts it's influence over the hearts and minds of the gullible? Isn't the "live and let live" attitude of the right (while the left's propaganda machine was in overdrive) what got us into this mess in the first place?
LMFAO! This list is as biased as you can get. Lmfao!
No, your biased!
@@stedew001 NO YOUR BIASED!!!
@@stedew001
And you're illiterate. It's "you're," not "your."
Quabledistocficklepo, Your username is illiterate. Next....
@@LostinParadise03
I suggest that you get someone else to follow, because Christ is not serving you very well. Maybe he never went to school.
I think that this chart is a good starting point, but by only looking for bias in editorializing stories it doesn't address two other sources of bias in news - namely bias in what news stories are or are not reported on a media outlet and selective editing and omissions of opposing facts. Admittedly trying to factor in those other biases would be far more difficult to do, but unless it is done this chart can't be considered anything other than a half baked cake.
This can't be real because it hasn't been taken down yet.
I remember my uncle showing me this several years ago when trump first started running and I asked them who produced this chart, do they have bias too?
All the far left are n the middle? Hell, I know more than her!
can you say what news IS Neutral? in your opinion. Honestly?
@Christopher White so true
@Christopher White according to most low IQ Liberals, anything that is remotely right or against the DNC is "far right"
yes... because you are the arbiter of what is neutral
@@64_bit80 and what gives the woman in the vid the authority to decide what is neutral? The program has to be designed, you know? Someone has to tell it how to decide what is neutral, which this woman did a poor job of doing
It’s greAt to see a convenient chart of who’s fair and balance...wait a minute.
Who’s putting the chart together and are they truly impartial? 🧐
like saying snopes is the source of truth........ bull !
did you even watch the video holy shit ...pay attention please
Okay, this is going to be long but it explains how the research was done and why we see the results as faulty.
So, the methodology used disengages bias by incorporating the use of computers to scan and categorize specific words/phrases, which have been scientifically validated, as left or right leaning. They also had the computer programmed to evaluate the use of opinion based lexicon and fact based lexicon in each headline/report. Continuing, those numbers were then tabulated with use of statistical programming. Giving us the results we see.
So now let me explain and give an example of why it seems to us that the sites are more biased than what this chart shows-
If the numbers showed that a site where people gather their news had 45 articles with right leaning lexicon and 53 with left leaning lexicon, that would place that site slightly left of center but still in the neutral area because the percentage breakdown is 54% left and, 46% right leaning. Now note the numerical differences between 45 and 53. That is 8. Not a big number right? Well now let’s make those numbers more realistic. Let’s say we multiply that 45 and 53 by 1000, making 45,000 right and 53,000 left leaning. That difference is now 8,000. Much more significant, right? However 53,000 is still 54% and 45,000 is still 46%, making the site just slightly left leaning but still neutral. However to the consumer, 8,000 biased articles is still HUGE. (Keep in mind, we cannot consume all 98,000 articles on a site, so we cherry pick what interests us most. If someone is left leaning, they will share left leaning articles that prove their point, typically from a site that they can find articles that support their viewpoint easier, such as Buzzfeed. They won’t share the right leaning articles. This then creates the illusion to the public that a site is more biased than what it appears.
Does this make sense?
So long story short, the graph is accurate but our perspective of reality can make it seem incorrect.
Could you please update this to include OAN & News Max, etc?
No media are without their own bias. But bias can be made more transparent.
The AP is neutral and completely fact based... 🤣
Edward - from your own source - “Overall, we rate the Associated Press borderline Left-Center Biased due to left-leaning editorializing”
@@tmtaylo4983 Yeah, they got a centrist rating, and then it says that, I forgot you cant see what the extension says. To get Left Leaning bias, that's pretty ok. There are very few who get complete center. Left leaning is better than left and far left, and puts it in the middle. The extension says they are central
@@Edward-qe8xg except that mediabias is not an actual professional fact-checking group using scientifically proven analysis methods, unlike what they claim to be. Amateurs at best.
Well, at least they're popularising the idea of fact-checking.
@@aphroditesaphrodisiac3272 Regardless, AP is unbias, I'd be interested if you could show this bias.
@@stevearcher6100 I would never use buzzfeed or suggest Bloomberg is unbias, but AP is one of the least bias. If you can sent me a bid article, I'll accept it.
This chart needs to be updated for sure😂
That graph is corporate BS.
My chart would look different
Lmaoo how is CNN neutral it’s gatta be pretty left
*Skews left
The chart says CNN is left bias, learn to read a chart.
Apparently not left enough since they really don't want Bernie Sanders to be their running candidate.
CNN is liberal centrist, vide Pro Democrats.
bruh,,,,,,, its right wing
@@pokor5791 But it says CNN is "More Reliable" .. that falls flat.
To paraphrase Ant-Man in Endgame, "She LOOKS like a leftist."
She is totally left. I used to work with her
And you sound like a rightist.
@@jamtariusjjjohnson I bet she has a poster of stalin on the wall.
Alternative title: Biased News source gives chart on “unbiased news sources”
Ah yes, buzzfeed is only slightly left
It'd be interesting to show the logo size based on audience size. It seems there is a slight tilt left based on the graphic for media as a whole based on the selection, but quantity of viewers is an interesting variable.
Either that or an interactive online 3d chart with the Z axis being the popularity.
anyone else notice that Bloomberg news (a left leaning source) was on the right, that should tell you all you need to know
@Simon Eminger they literally campaigned for the democratic party with a large quantity of anti-trump rhetoric, I didn't say leftist i said left leaning
@@aidenfurry471 Democrats are right wingers. Being anti trump doesn't make you a socialist lmao
@@luc6284 so everybody right of Stalin's a right-winger? no that's not how it works you don't get to claim that they're right-wingers just because they're not socialist, the democrats are left-wing just less left than the "democratic-socialists"
@@aidenfurry471 Bernie Sanders is a centrist in my book, but maybe in the American frame of reference a moderate leftist. I do consider proper leftists to be anti-capitalist by definition, but I guess this isn't a rule. In the French revolution the capitalists would have been left wingers whilst the aristocracy was right wing. Overtime these things change and the previous left becomes the new status quo, making it right wing. Regarding America, I don't see any way in which the Democrats are not trying to conserve the status quo, which makes them right wing in my book. The so called "democratic socialists" do call for some moderate reforms, so in a sense they are trying to change the status quo, but they don't seek to overthrow the system as a whole, so I guess they can be considered moderate left at best.
@@luc6284 a centrist? really? the guy that honeymooned in the USSR is a centrist? the same man that praised Venezuela for bread lines and Cuba for its literacy program? are you feeling well?
A lot of work went into this - unfortunatly a good dart thrown at the board would have less bias as this chart!
CBS/ABC/NBC/CNN Neutral? What a freakin joke.
I give her credit for the CONCEPT. There is a desperate need for accountability in US Media. Having said that, it will inevitably attract criticism for perceived mistakes and the founder's own perceived biases (as the report mentions)
I was super excited when I read the title because this is something that I want to do but not only with traditional platforms but social media as well.... but then I saw the chart and how inaccurate and bias it is..SMH
U just described bias, ur the definition of bias. She counted the articles that were right vs left leaning and averaged them. American “left” politics are still relatively center compared to the rest of the world
@@lucamne27 True, but she rated CNN as neutral, and there's just no way. I'm NOT a Trump supporter so don't even go there. I just want the facts from the news. I do want not selective coverage (= bias) or editorial commentary pretending to be straight news. **What is the media so afraid of that it can't trust us to think for ourselves??
@@jchi9341 I think it’s less about bias or conspiracy and more just about numbers. People don’t really want news they just want to be told their opinions right back to them. There’s also probably significant difference in reporting between written articles and the stuff that goes on TV. Personally I just go with AP news
@@lucamne27 compared to Europe and Oceania, not the rest of the world
@Luca Mne Dude, that’s not even remotely true.
Sweetheart, it doesn't matter whether the news makes you angry or polarizes you. ALL that matters, is it the TRUTH !
Why doesn't RUclips show thumbs down ratings anymore? Hmmm not strange in this social climate.
This subject urgently warrants attention. High quality un-processed information would be so much less incendiary, frustrating, and insulting than the produced garbage that for profit news outlets throw at us. Thanks for posting.
The night the first Trump indictments were released I went on Fox, CNN, newsmax and MSNBC.
Newsmax turned the indictment into a gestapo evil witch hunt, and made no reference to the text or availability of the actual indictment.
Fox wasn't far behind, though Ingraham quoted the indictment one time, she did not inform her audience that it was available.
CNN quoted the text often and mentioned that the source material (the actual indictment) was free to download.
MSNBC, believe it or not, openly encouraged their viewers to download the file and gave a link to it on screen.
That told me a whole lot.
Ah perfect, a non bias chart made by a single person. Looks good to me.
Saw the thumbnail with CNN on the line between neutral and skews left, knew I didn’t need to watch it and moved on. If I want lies I’ll watch BBC news. Thanks
The analysis may not be perfect. In fact she admits so much. Just shift everything to the left if you think she's got a bias. Then you still end up with a very useful comparison of different media.
Her analysis is the best I've seen.
why? because your priest told u?
"People need to understand that it's my opinion what other opinions, opinion."
Just as an example, I came across the story Urooj Rahman in my feed. I looked up this story online to see what the narrative would be among some leading news outlets and clicked on three of the top results. The New York post had the most information, including statements made by the judge, the defendant (including those of remorse and some background information claiming the influence of substance abuse), and the messages exchanged that night showing the scope of intent. CNN focused on the BLM movement that led to the riot and emphasized the police car was empty but at least mentioned that she was trying to give other demonstrators Molotov cocktails to follow her example - no mention of messages relayed calling to burn entire precincts down. Reuters had the least amount of information and downplayed everything, making it out like a college prank gone wrong with her trashing a vandalized and abandoned vehicle. This is our news, ladies and gentlemen - the “unbiased” information feed to the world. I literally have to read cringey articles from the myriad of left leaning and one or two right leaning news groups to piece together all the information they leave out to get any semblance of the truth.
how do we know whoever made this chart is the perfect example of objectivity?
Go on her site and review her methodology.
What makes her neutral?
“I want to make news consumers smarter.”
Cue consumers refusing to buy from brands that advertize in either lower corner ---- or just the lower part, period. THAT would change politics by making it FAR more expenssive to buy consent for whatever.
The BBC, Sky News and ITV should all be placed super far left.
But they're not left they are neoliberal which is a right wing ideology culturally progressive economically right wing
@Jesse Hoffman i agree neoliberalism is a disease
Imagine if they did a chart for entertainment media.
Entertainment media, is for entertainment. If it's bad or good it's really up to you based on your taste of entertainment.
Now, if you're getting your news source from entertainment media , then you're the problem.
@@JuaniPodrido Exactly
I'm looking for true news sources, but I can't see the chart well. If you know of any, please comment below! Thanks!!
Great overview and explanation! Thank God that Scripps news is involved in this, good for you thank you for your wonderful analysis!
The most accurate part of this is definitely CNN.
The latest version is a bit different. CNN skews right, Fox news skews left, I think that's correct. There just much more radical bias on both sides of the isle, that makes CNN and Fox News look moderate.
The fact the CNN is even close to the middle ... I can't even take this seriously! 🙈. CNN is SO left and is ALL opinion!
Dude ur talkign about cnn opinion. Like don lemon etc. But their facts first isnt wrong. Yes they are very bias, but they aent fake news and if u think they are. Your just listening to the wrong shit and thats opinion
Yea, CNN should stand for Commie news network cause that's basically what they are
@@user-br2gi8kh5s how exactly are they communist lol?
@@dobrik333 The policies that the network puts out are basically communist
@@user-br2gi8kh5s ik they are liberal and left bias, but they arent even close to communist. Name one communist thing.
This aged like milk 🥛
Neutrality is not objectivity. Being neutral isn’t something you should be proud of.Objectivity gives you the right answers because it doesn’t apply a false sense of truth like the words neutrality and centrism.
Bahahahahahaha 😂😂😂 she think ABC is objective. That’s a good one
Appeal to populism
Bull Shivic
(Bolshevik, bull, civic- minded, demagogue), someone who gains political power by appealing to people's emotion's instincts, & prejudices in a way that is considered manipulative & myopic; someone who incessantly reiterates the same petty complaints, until they are taken seriously.
There are citizens with valid complaints & issues, but invariably the meeting will have to deal with some Bullshivic & his personal gripe of "supreme importance".
How the hell is CNN unbiased?
Did you forget the y axis? CNN is leaning in the more opinion based btw
Crazy how often this chart would actually need to change. It should look like ants on apples.
I had to sign into Google just to see this