JWST had a Turbulent History, but was worth it.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024

Комментарии • 585

  • @ScienceAsylum
    @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +23

    Get Nebula for 40% off with my link: go.nebula.tv/scienceasylum
    Then watch me in a D&D game: nebula.tv/videos/neurotransmissions-a-therapeutic-dungeons-dragons-oneshot?ref=scienceasylum

    • @acombo
      @acombo Год назад +2

      nah

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +6

      @@acombo That's fine. I'm not pressuring you.

    • @acombo
      @acombo Год назад +3

      💀@@ScienceAsylum

    • @govcorpwatch
      @govcorpwatch Год назад

      5:16 Dr. Angela Collier @acollierastro has some great data points regarding Webb and the naming of the 'scope. very funny. Webb has nothing to do with space, he was just simply an administrator from Dept. of State brought in to manage NASA for a time period. He had no real discoveries or anything significant that he himself contributed other than just Administrating. 🤣 ruclips.net/video/18aA36pUIbc/видео.html

    • @meinkamph5327
      @meinkamph5327 Год назад +1

      Ur not a good listener.
      You are not able too see.
      But it's all just for funnies......

  • @iammrbeat
    @iammrbeat Год назад +15

    Update- I now have grass! I've been watching the grass grow for a few days now!

  • @0-by-1_Publishing_LLC
    @0-by-1_Publishing_LLC Год назад +194

    The first design was for an 8,000-mile-diameter space telescope, but building a World Wide Webb telescope proved to be problematic.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +35

      😂

    • @chuckoneill2023
      @chuckoneill2023 Год назад +5

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @AlexandarHullRichter
      @AlexandarHullRichter Год назад +14

      Ironically, there actually is such a world-wide networked telescope set up to get that 8,000 mile diameter. It's called the Event Horizon telescope, and that's how we've gotten the images we have of the M86 super massive black hole, as well as Sagittarius A*

    • @Piotrek7654321
      @Piotrek7654321 Год назад +2

      For now.

  • @andueskitzoidneversolo2823
    @andueskitzoidneversolo2823 Год назад +229

    Learning history is supposed to bother us. That's how we learn to be better

    • @Wisteriu
      @Wisteriu Год назад +40

      That's one of the best youtube comments I've ever read...

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +44

      Fair point.

    • @saratov99
      @saratov99 Год назад

      Year, turns out they were right in the 50's, now communists are in power everywhere.

    • @highlander723
      @highlander723 Год назад +1

      @@Wisteriu Not really I've seen way better

    • @jasonremy1627
      @jasonremy1627 Год назад +15

      History that doesn't upset people is just public relations.

  • @iammrbeat
    @iammrbeat Год назад +8

    You finally made a history video! lol

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +8

      😆 Researching this was BRUTAL! I have a newfound appreciation for history YTers.

    • @trevinbeattie4888
      @trevinbeattie4888 Год назад +3

      Well hello, Mr. Beat! ❤

  • @surgeeo1406
    @surgeeo1406 Год назад +52

    Watching the launch live was my personal moon landing experience, I was obsessed with it for weeks!

    • @MrEkzotic
      @MrEkzotic Год назад

      Cool. I didn't watch it launch, but I did see it in person when it was being built.

    • @highlander723
      @highlander723 Год назад

      How high did your heart rate get. I watched the launch myself. 145 with worry and stress

    • @anthonyb5279
      @anthonyb5279 Год назад +2

      @@highlander723 I was stressed till we got well calibrated images from it.

    • @zblurth855
      @zblurth855 Год назад +1

      it was such a awesome launch, my family did see me disappear at the Christmas party lol, to bad I was the only one neerding out on it

    • @surgeeo1406
      @surgeeo1406 Год назад +1

      @@zblurth855 I was alone too 😭 I tried explaining my mom how much of a big deal it was, but she was all like "As long as you're happy sweetie."

  • @playgroundchooser
    @playgroundchooser Год назад +38

    Nick, I probably overuse this; but this may be your best video yet. Learning about history *should* make one upset, as that is the only way we can avoid repeating it.

    • @highlander723
      @highlander723 Год назад +6

      I think the title was a little misleading I was expecting a technical video about the challenges and building it not seven minute history lesson about the namesake.

    • @joho0
      @joho0 Год назад +1

      If you get upset about history, you might not want to read about Genghis Khan.

    • @MusicalRaichu
      @MusicalRaichu Год назад +2

      @@joho0 but the mongols are an exception to everything in history.

    • @sacha9593
      @sacha9593 Год назад

      The goal is not to "learn" about history but to feel superior to people of the past and to virtue signal.
      It seems to me that the cancel crowd* don't try to "avoid" doing the same mistakes as McCarthy and friends, they just try to emulate him for the other side.
      *I am not talking about Science Asylum

    • @djgroopz4952
      @djgroopz4952 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@MusicalRaichuHow are they an exception?

  • @DaBlondDude
    @DaBlondDude Год назад +45

    It's a misunderstood thing; trying to do something that's never been done means treading in unknown places = inevitable that errors be made while learning. The American CERN got canceled too by yet more who don't understand the pioneering process

    • @highlander723
      @highlander723 Год назад

      Yeah people that try to cancel other people because they don't agree with narratives or responsible for more damage in scientific progress than anything else

    • @snex000
      @snex000 Год назад

      You want to spend trillions on science, great. Spend YOUR trillions. Public moneys are not yours to play with.

    • @ChinnuWoW
      @ChinnuWoW Год назад +11

      @@snex000 Science develops technology to improve your life. It's very important for humanity. It should absolutely be funded by tax money. You should instead be complaining about the trillions spent per year on the military just to meddle with other countries to start wars.

    • @snex000
      @snex000 Год назад

      @@ChinnuWoW Science that produces results will be invested in on its own, because investors like profits. The government only gets in the way, as you clearly saw in this video. It's nothing but grifters taking their cut while the actual project budget explodes and goes overdue. Stop engaging in whataboutism. This is NOT what tax dollars are for. There shouldn't even BE tax dollars.

    • @zblurth855
      @zblurth855 Год назад +7

      @@snex000 OMG you know that fundamental science is one of the best investment a government can make as it is estimated that every dollar spend in it increases the gpd by 7$
      you know creation of jobs, a LOT of new technologies (if you know what a book is you can find one dedicated to all the new tech that descended from the Apollo program)
      Also I hope you do not enjoy the internet or GPS or anything that needed infrastructure and development by public money lol

  • @jasonengel
    @jasonengel Год назад +12

    I appreciate the deep dive into the history surrounding the name for this telescope.

  • @user-xr7rv4vb8n
    @user-xr7rv4vb8n Год назад +13

    Great video as always. The JWST is truly a wondrous accomplishment and shows what the human race is capable of when we put our minds and investment to it.

  • @luudest
    @luudest Год назад +13

    After one year of operation and exciting results: No one asks about the money anymore 😂

    • @chrimony
      @chrimony Год назад +1

      We still ask about how long it took.

    • @jayjasespud
      @jayjasespud Год назад +1

      ​@@chrimonyGood thing you have videos like this to answer, then.

    • @chrimony
      @chrimony Год назад

      @@jayjasespud There's no good answer. They messed up.

  • @apburner1
    @apburner1 Год назад +10

    I don't really care what Webb thought or did, it was 1950 ffs, a completely different time and set of norms.

  • @bejibx
    @bejibx Год назад +7

    On behalf of all overly-straightforward people, thank you Mr. Beat for the heads clarification

  • @Nf6xNet
    @Nf6xNet Год назад +9

    Wow, this one went down some rabbit holes! I'm sure glad that JWST is a success.

  • @Golden_SnowFlake
    @Golden_SnowFlake Год назад +7

    I really enjoyed this video format.
    Well done, Not because I specifically enjoyed this video, but because I think others will too, obviously.
    The dirt lawn segment was especially spot on.

  • @billyyank2198
    @billyyank2198 Год назад +4

    "Hexagons are the best-agons."
    Someone has been watching CGP Grey.

    • @charleswood1193
      @charleswood1193 Год назад +1

      Yes! This is exactly what I was thinking! How long before he mentions @CGPGrey 's bees 🐝

  • @misterlau5246
    @misterlau5246 Год назад +5

    Great historical essay.
    When you have to do this big project and you are the first ones to do it,..
    Advancements are not easy to achieve

  • @parallaxe5394
    @parallaxe5394 Год назад +3

    Hello. It is not only american history Nick. The more you learn about history in general the more you want to cry, cry and cry.

  • @jamesmnguyen
    @jamesmnguyen Год назад +11

    That spectrum diagram of the EM ranges of JWST and Hubble was really cool to see. I wonder what the other telescopes would look like on that graph?

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +9

      Thanks! I spent _entirely too much_ time on that graphic.

    • @jamesmnguyen
      @jamesmnguyen Год назад +7

      ​@@ScienceAsylum Your worked paid off. It really showed how wide the EM range of JWST is.

    • @highlander723
      @highlander723 Год назад +2

      It was the only good technical part of the video

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +3

      @@highlander723 I actually intended this month's video to be a technical video about the telescope, but the video had other plans.

    • @highlander723
      @highlander723 Год назад +2

      @@ScienceAsylum Hey make whatever video you want. Just make the title reflect the content. Its too clickbaity, you are better than that!

  • @collin4555
    @collin4555 Год назад +4

    Alright, that's a pretty solid investigation of the historical record, and I'm glad to be made aware of it. In general I would say I'm apprehensive naming things after people though. I'd rather we just didn't. But I'll own the fact that this is mostly a vague emotional position that I can't rationalize, and I wouldn't expect that to mean anything.

  • @blightchip4236
    @blightchip4236 Год назад +5

    I love when Mr Beat interrupts people’s videos

  • @misakamikoto8785
    @misakamikoto8785 Год назад +88

    If limited budget can build something like this, just imagine what humans can build if there are no war and no military spendings.

    • @wally7856
      @wally7856 Год назад +11

      Not much, rockets were developed by the military.

    • @Sonny_McMacsson
      @Sonny_McMacsson Год назад +17

      @@wally7856 Because something arose from X doesn't mean it had to arise from X or otherwise not exist. In the world OP is imagining, some other path would most certainly exist.

    • @wally7856
      @wally7856 Год назад +5

      @@Sonny_McMacsson Then he needs to stop imagining and wake up. In a world full of humans, war and military spending is how technology moves forward.

    • @beardlyinteresting
      @beardlyinteresting Год назад

      @@wally7856 False, most scientific advancement was made purely for the sake of scientific curiosity.

    • @Sonny_McMacsson
      @Sonny_McMacsson Год назад

      @@wally7856 No, he doesn't. How things are isn't a good reason to keep them that way or not aim for better. Humans doing something also isn't definitive evidence that humans are innately that way. I'd say imagination and want to improve is more awake than someone asleep justifying the status quo.
      Also, the military and war being what moves tech forward is B.S. and it should be obvious enough that's the case. It being A way doesn't make it essential nor mean other things ways don't. Many of us have made things because we like to do it and military applications were never a factor.

  • @asicdathens
    @asicdathens Год назад +5

    Northrop Grumman was charging $1m for each day it remained inside the clean chamber at Redondo Beach. The fact that some NG employees messed the spacecraft component and added months in delays at the end it benefited the company

    • @misteratoz
      @misteratoz 8 месяцев назад

      That's fucked up

  • @Hossak
    @Hossak Год назад +2

    The large hadron cost about 5 billion, plus a billion a year running costs plus upgrades plus plus plus. The next one is already more than 20 billion...... estimated.

  • @boriskourt
    @boriskourt Год назад +8

    Yay! Glad you are on Nebula now :)

  • @GIRGHGH
    @GIRGHGH Год назад +7

    I hope eventually we can see them make the big boy. Twice the size, 3 times the wavelength coverage, and launched less than a decade after inception.

    • @highlander723
      @highlander723 Год назад +3

      plans are on the table.... its going to be called the Carl Sagan observatory

  • @JonathanMandrake
    @JonathanMandrake Год назад +8

    to me, it seems like the red and lavender scare are both massive violations of the first amendment, but what do i as a non american know xD

    • @chrimony
      @chrimony Год назад

      Now we're told that the "far right" is "weaponizing" the 1st Amendment. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +5

      Oh, for sure, but (unfortunately) laws are rarely enforced equally and consistently (not even the bill of rights). They bend to the whim/mood of the people who enforce them.

  • @amonraii7273
    @amonraii7273 11 месяцев назад +2

    We live in the era of people's personal opinions decades ago on completely unrelated topics wiping off their entire achievements. Snowflakes for sure

  • @ComradePhoenix
    @ComradePhoenix Год назад +2

    Come for the science, stay for the thoughtful and incisive historical perspective.

  • @lexinwonderland5741
    @lexinwonderland5741 Год назад +15

    As a queer person in STEM, **thank you so much for this video**!! It genuinely acknowledges the horrors that happened to us under the US government, but clarifies point by point with facts instead of picking an easy scapegoat. This was brilliantly done, great content!!

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +7

      Thanks for letting me know. I was a little worried I wasn't doing the topic justice.

  • @bierrollerful
    @bierrollerful Год назад +14

    The show "For All Mankind" touched on the lavender scare in and around NASA. The "scare" was that people with a different sexual orientation were more vulnerable to blackmail because they would be ostracized by society and would lose their job at NASA if it became public.
    You'd think the solution was to _not_ ostracize them, so that they'd be _less_ vulnerable... but at the time, they decided to do the exact opposite and just double down on the paranoia.
    (the show is pretty good for the first two seasons or so btw)

    • @MrAlRats
      @MrAlRats Год назад +3

      So you think changing the mindset of all Americans about a group of people would have been easier than preventing a small minority of people from occupying certain jobs? People who are more vulnerable to blackmail have always been a national security threat.

    • @collin4555
      @collin4555 Год назад

      @@MrAlRats I mean, they made it worse, and the gay people are just going to hide and keep working. It's not exactly a genius strategy.

    • @TheLastScoot
      @TheLastScoot Год назад +5

      @@MrAlRats If you control whether you hire them, you can make it clear that you won't fire people for that reason, and that you'd support them through any hardships they face.

    • @bierrollerful
      @bierrollerful Год назад +6

      @@MrAlRats Yeah, becaue I highly doubt that "all Americans" had that mindset.
      And making things worse for vulnerable people only makes them even more vulnerable. So that angle is completely backwards anyway.

    • @MrAlRats
      @MrAlRats Год назад

      @@bierrollerful You're delusional. The vast majority of people in America at the time found homosexuality to be disgusting. Most people would disown their children if they came out as homosexual. Homosexuals were legitimately concerned about being ostracised by their family members and friends. And anybody who has a secret can be blackmailed into leaking classified info or sabotaging critical projects. Making vulnerable people more vulnerable is not a concern. National security is far more important.

  • @hurmzz
    @hurmzz Год назад +6

    I always thought not naming the telescope to a scientist was the weird thing.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +4

      Oh yeah, it's definitely weird. It's just not _offensive._

    • @hurmzz
      @hurmzz Год назад +1

      @@ScienceAsylum yeah I learned more about Webb (the person) only recently. You explained it very well. Turns out Webb actually tried working against bigotry.
      But we also must not forget the environment is a major influencer on behavior and people tend to be scared of things they don’t understand. Doesn’t mean they are evil though.

  • @davideldridge3686
    @davideldridge3686 Год назад +3

    We made the JWST battery. It took so long, they had us make a whole new battery that hadn't been in storage for so long.

  • @Hydroverse
    @Hydroverse Год назад +5

    It'd be cool if the telescope was 10m in diameter.

    • @TlalocTemporal
      @TlalocTemporal Год назад

      100m would be even cooler. A constellation of JWSTs at each planet's oitside Lagrange point forming a real-time telescope of dozens of AU in diameter would be nuts, and completely possible with today's technology.

  • @punditgi
    @punditgi Год назад +2

    It definitely pays to be a little crazy to watch this channel. 🙄

  • @R.o.Ro.
    @R.o.Ro. 11 месяцев назад +2

    Big shoutout to ESA and Ariane Space as well.

  • @hurmzz
    @hurmzz Год назад +4

    The budget is actually tiny when you consider that it’s not coming from a country, but basicly a continent. You can’t even see it’s tiny fraction of the total spending. Then there’s inflation. But the most important things are the advances we are getting back from it. And it would probably be possible to calculate a value for that (although in the future when these things have happened), would be interesting to see a cost/benefit calculation for something like this. Like all the stuff that came from the Apollo missions that’s provided decades of new science and tech.

    • @AverageAlien
      @AverageAlien Год назад

      Doesn't matter, still all funded by stolen tax payer wealth. The only stolen wealth that can be justified is the wealth going to millitary and courts. Outside of that, everything should be in the private sector exclusively.

  • @XEinstein
    @XEinstein Год назад +7

    13:38 Hexagons ARE the bestagons, indeed!

  • @stevengeorges9046
    @stevengeorges9046 Год назад +19

    Thank you European Space Agency for launching JWST, and for doing a fantastic job extending its lifetime!!!! 👏🏼🚀

  • @SpaveFrostKing
    @SpaveFrostKing 11 месяцев назад +1

    From Wikipedia: "Webb made racial integration a priority for the agency. NASA publicly supported the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and initiated a series of innovative programs aimed at increasing black participation including specifically targeting black colleges and schools with recruitment programs. On one occasion Webb and Werner von Braun famously confronted and lectured segregationist Alabama Governor George Wallace on racial integration in front of the press. NASA had the worst black representation of any government agency in 1961, but by the time Webb stepped down, it was the best and considered the model for other government agencies on racial integration."
    James Webb was a good guy. Was he perfect, especially by today's standards? Probably not. But he clearly thought civil rights were important. It would have been easy for someone in his position to hire a few token minorities, but largely maintain the status quo, saying something like, "NASA hires by merit - we hope in the future the black colleges are better so we're able to hire more of their graduates."

  • @SudaNIm103
    @SudaNIm103 Год назад +1

    Even if he had said it; As a gay man, I’m personally okay with the naming of the JWST. While I value the controversy and the conversations it fosters, I acknowledge the naming honors Webb's work at NASA and in no material way serves to platform or perpetuate any wrongheaded, discriminatory beliefs he held.
    I think this serves as a good teachable moment, perhaps now more than ever before we must learn how to distinguish between the faults and virtues of historic and public figures.
    This isn’t a tacit prescription, for how to handle every problematic figure, but I think it's exemplary of the attitude we should strive to take when addressing these matters. While we should not turn a blind eye to such ill revelations, we should neither jump to strike from history or remembrance, those tainted but otherwise deserving. We can leverage, celebrate, and remember their works and greatness while we acknowledge, contextualize, and mourn their harm and failures.
    Our virtue and capacity to achieve greatness is matched if not exceeded by our ignorance, short-sightedness, and propensity for fear. This is true of us all, the best and the worst; it's innate to our humanity.

  • @chuckoneill2023
    @chuckoneill2023 Год назад +1

    So Dan Savage (of Savage Love fame) started that whole controversy? Wow.
    I like him as a gay rights activist. This just goes to prove he's not a journalist (though a fine writer).

  • @andrewzhuk8713
    @andrewzhuk8713 10 месяцев назад +1

    "the more I learn about American history" reminded me about sterilization of people who had low IQ. I believe it was somewhere in mid 1900.

  • @Ti0Luch0
    @Ti0Luch0 7 месяцев назад +1

    Terrible stuff history has to reveal, indeed. Good thing you're an astrophysicist. Thank you for your work!

  • @tetraquark4477
    @tetraquark4477 Год назад +1

    wow. I'm old. I still remember salivating over Kepler being launched 2 years before they launched it.

  • @SurajKumar-ln8ij
    @SurajKumar-ln8ij Год назад +3

    The one factor which applies to every telescope is
    "Size Matters".

  • @reBorn7458X
    @reBorn7458X 11 месяцев назад +1

    Out of 10 billion dollars, 8 billion ended in someone else’s pockets.
    I want to be Nasa scientist, I wanna eat 10 billion pie too!!!

  • @edwardcs1285
    @edwardcs1285 Год назад +5

    This is amazing. Thank you for the deep dive into the history.

  • @justanormalyoutubeuser3868
    @justanormalyoutubeuser3868 Год назад +1

    5:26 The soviet Vostok missions put the first humans in space. The way you say it suggests NASA did, a big lie by omission.

  • @dragovian
    @dragovian Год назад +1

    Hexagons ARE the Bestagons!
    shoutout to your- no, THE best april's fool joke

  • @IamGhede
    @IamGhede Год назад +1

    Hexagons are the bestagons! I just recently rewatched that video. Yesterday in fact and it was so good that I watched it twice.

  • @javiej
    @javiej Год назад +1

    ... and that's why the politicians managing the JWT program were sent to UK, to manage the HS2.program.

  • @Optimal_Living01
    @Optimal_Living01 Год назад +2

    Keep posting we're watching, large view count don't matter if their not "loyal" views. You'll always have "crazie" fan in me.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +2

      I made something a little different than usual and a lot of people don't like that. I bet the video will find its audience eventually. #NoRegrets

    • @Optimal_Living01
      @Optimal_Living01 Год назад +2

      @@ScienceAsylum at least your not taking sponsorships that might compromise your fan loyalty 😂 take the sponsorship but still have a critical thinking and probing point of view. I think the formula for you have works great, simple explanations, no "wooing" the crowd with jargon, or focusing on visuals without a comprehensive explanation. Among your peers, you were the one that started my interest in science, I downloaded your book (free pdf, forgive me🥺) and I like your approach with the clones, and "people in the comments typing", and having your loving wife be apart of your growth. 💪 Great men aren't supposed to please everybody, only those that matter lol To put it simply, when I watch one of your peers videos, I gotta rewatch it a couple time to understand (go figure) but I only have to watch your videos once to understand.

  • @fredg8328
    @fredg8328 11 месяцев назад +1

    They probably had to spend a few millions more just to investigate about this quote

  • @Pixels7
    @Pixels7 Год назад +3

    13:37 love the reference

  • @sphakamisozondi
    @sphakamisozondi 10 месяцев назад +1

    The Keyboard Warrior Clone, lowkey has good questions 😅

  • @imaginaryphi1618
    @imaginaryphi1618 Год назад +1

    ...unfolded et cetera. Pun intended.
    Good to see you in good shape Nick. 🤗

  • @TheVoidSinger
    @TheVoidSinger Год назад +1

    Didn't see that you had popped up on Nebula, nice, instant follow.

  • @ericpug9154
    @ericpug9154 Год назад +2

    Well, there goes plans for the Trudeau telescope.

  • @davidmoyer9303
    @davidmoyer9303 Год назад +2

    The way Mr.Beat pulls that off deserves some kind of award!

  • @lyledal
    @lyledal Год назад +1

    "The mid-1900s..."
    Oh, lort. I AM SO OLD.

  • @garyfilmer382
    @garyfilmer382 Год назад +1

    A brilliant video, thank you, Nick, an historical narrative on some of most important political and social justice issues that have concerned us in modern times, along with a potted history of the JWST. NASA should just stick to naming telescopes and space probes after astronomers/physicists, and astronomical nomenclature though, that way arguments can be avoided (hopefully!). I’m subversively over budget too (Lol!🤣), having recently spent $I,800 on a new (secondhand) Takahashi telescope 🔭 Stunning optics!

  • @EpicMathTime
    @EpicMathTime Год назад +1

    How do you always make videos about things I had random conversation about the same day?

  • @neoness1268
    @neoness1268 Год назад +1

    Awesome video about the James Webb telescope 👌✨✨✨✨✨

  • @jonfreeman8102
    @jonfreeman8102 10 месяцев назад +1

    Great videos but if you think American History is bad check out Russian, Chinese, Turkish, Czech Vietnamese or literally any other country in the world. We all have messed up histories. Sadly it’s human nature. America is not even slightly unique in this way. Always annoying and intellectually lazy when people call out only America for their history just because it’s trendy.

  • @gbreslin6635
    @gbreslin6635 Год назад +2

    Hey mate, I like you. You're a good man :)

  • @Sonny_McMacsson
    @Sonny_McMacsson Год назад +1

    I would go with Telescopy McTelescopeface to avoid controversy.
    Funny that: Antony Blinken -> A. Blinken -> Abe Lincoln

    • @narfwhals7843
      @narfwhals7843 Год назад +1

      I would totally be cool with scopey mcscopeface.

  • @kennichols3992
    @kennichols3992 Год назад +1

    Dan Savage (of The Stranger) is a lunatic. For a small example, there was a political candidate that he hated. So Dan, having a severe cold, went t this politician's campaign headquarters and - not kidding - licked all the door knobs, hoping to sicken the politician's staff. Then he wrote a piece on what he did.

  • @michaeldeal1625
    @michaeldeal1625 Год назад +3

    I wished you could have said more about why it was decided that the Webb Telescope would focus exclusively on the IR range, while Hubble was more on the visible and UV. And what can be investigated in each regime.

    • @johnsmith34
      @johnsmith34 Год назад +1

      I doubt there's more than what has already been said in this video and others.
      Longer wavelengths can see earlier parts of the universe which we couldn't see before. We don't really know what we're going to see with it, and that's the value of this telescope that you wouldn't get from something that is merely better than Hubble.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +2

      PBS Space Time did a good video on it already: ruclips.net/video/kw-Rs6I2H5s/видео.html I had nothing to add.

  • @sobertillnoon
    @sobertillnoon Год назад +1

    Seriously Nick‽ doubled, tripled, quintupled, then 8 times? Have the courage to say octupled you coward!

  • @jonathanwalther
    @jonathanwalther Год назад +1

    That political rabbit hole...... Great stuff!

  • @michaelmcdoesntexist1459
    @michaelmcdoesntexist1459 Год назад +2

    What we learned today?
    Hexagons are bestagons!
    Jokes aside, is hurtful to know you can stand for equality to the point of resigning a very important job, just to have a few people in the future decades accusing you of being exactly the kind of person you opposed for the sake of visibility and controversy. Almost as hurtful as admitting the budget for spacial investigation is so small... almost as hurtful as recognizing in the present day that were facing the same social problems we faced 70 years ago and learned almost nothing.
    Yes. Learning history isn't always a pleasant experience, specially when politics come to the table. But is necessary if we want to build a better world. Thank you for sharing this with us.

  • @iaov
    @iaov Год назад +2

    Not a site I would think to go to for history, but well done. Thanks!❤️

  • @frk0788
    @frk0788 Год назад +1

    Hexagons are without any doubt the bestagons.

  • @RoscoeDaMule
    @RoscoeDaMule Год назад +1

    dude ur videos have been so disappointing this year

  • @davidmoyer9303
    @davidmoyer9303 Год назад +1

    Definitely the craziest episode I've ever seen!

  • @paxdriver
    @paxdriver Год назад +6

    I've never heard of the lavender scare. This is a really important video.

  • @andrea7693
    @andrea7693 Год назад +1

    Hexagon are definitely the bestagons 😂

  • @colt5189
    @colt5189 Год назад +1

    I remember when a scientist got fired a few years ago for having pictures of women on his tshirt when he landed a probe onto a moving asteroid.

    • @narfwhals7843
      @narfwhals7843 Год назад

      Maybe you should look into that again. As far as I can tell Matt Taylor is still working at Esa.

  • @AUBREYTHOMAS1979
    @AUBREYTHOMAS1979 Год назад +1

    JWST is a mirror-cle.... Nick missed an opportunity 😂😂😂

  • @cherubin7th
    @cherubin7th Год назад +1

    True, but that space CGI are worth it.

  • @TheIvalen
    @TheIvalen 11 месяцев назад +1

    Hi. What do you use to make the Timeline graphics used in the video? I like the visuals.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  11 месяцев назад

      It's After Effects. I designed the graphic myself as a template a few years ago and then update it periodically (when I learn new things).

  • @haydengittins2836
    @haydengittins2836 Год назад +4

    I have to admit I expected to see more kickback in the comments against your disgust of homophobia... then I remembered this is a Science channel so the average IQ is higher than normal.
    Great video once again.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +1

      Just give it time. The video hasn't made it outside my bubble yet.

    • @danieloberhofer9035
      @danieloberhofer9035 Год назад +2

      Oh boy, I can't even begin to tell you how much I wish this sentiment holds true.
      The atrocious ignorance some comment sections show is really hard to stomach sometimes.
      But judging from past experience, Nick's audience is indeed waaaaaaay above average when it comes to using their heads for more useful things than just housing the hole in which to put food in. 😉

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +2

      @@danieloberhofer9035 I make a point to delete/block offensive comments. I want to keep my comment section friendly.

    • @danieloberhofer9035
      @danieloberhofer9035 Год назад +1

      @@ScienceAsylum 👍👍👍
      I love how the Internet gives me more thumbs than I actually have to give a thumbs-up to good people like you, Nick.

  • @lahaya237
    @lahaya237 Год назад +1

    😂original way to portray us reactors

  • @robertbeaman5761
    @robertbeaman5761 Год назад +1

    I keep telling everyone that the smartest people in the world work at NASA

  • @azoberma7723
    @azoberma7723 Год назад +1

    13:37 "hexagos are the bestagons" ✨

  • @CarlMahnke
    @CarlMahnke Год назад

    Just picking a new name OR crawling through 50.000 pages and spend a fortune on doing that. Only NASA!

  • @mhonella
    @mhonella Год назад +4

    Another great video. Mr. Beat was a good addition.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +1

      Agree. I was happy to have him make an appearance.

    • @brothermine2292
      @brothermine2292 Год назад

      I disagree. The Mr Beat skit spent a minute to say what could have been said in 10 seconds, in order to tell lame jokes.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +1

      @@brothermine2292 Ah, you prefer pure educational content. Mr Beat and I make EDUtainment content. You seem to be in a _slightly_ wrong corner of RUclips.

    • @brothermine2292
      @brothermine2292 Год назад

      @@ScienceAsylum : Why would you conclude that because I found Mr Beat's humor lame, that I don't appreciate your humor more? The fact that I've viewed many of your videos is strong evidence that you're mistaken.

  • @Tony_Autrey__Last_Atlas
    @Tony_Autrey__Last_Atlas Год назад +1

    PLEASE do a video on spinors!

  • @joz6683
    @joz6683 Год назад +3

    Thaks for the history leason. The history of science is a passions of mine. Your should do more, the timeline is great.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +2

      It's also a passion of mine. I can't fully understand something until I get into the history behind it.

    • @highlander723
      @highlander723 Год назад

      @@ScienceAsylum Can judge it through the lens of today's standards versus standards of the time? Just asking

  • @h7opolo
    @h7opolo Год назад +1

    i like your acting as the commenting clone.

  • @j_mase
    @j_mase Год назад +2

    Great explanation of a complicated topic! I also appreciate the Futurama reference. Nothing like being entertained and educated at the same time. Thank you for what you do!

  • @ericeaton2386
    @ericeaton2386 Год назад +1

    I spy a Hello Internet shirt!

  • @anjachan
    @anjachan 10 месяцев назад +1

    wow, but the cost was worth it 😂

  • @Bassotronics
    @Bassotronics Год назад

    The aliens should help pay back all we invested trying to locate them. Heck, they’ll probably do the same when they see us.

  • @projectabryzz3163
    @projectabryzz3163 Год назад +2

    This Mr. Beat-Guy looks like he was present at the demon core incident....

  • @GlenHunt
    @GlenHunt 11 месяцев назад +2

    Congrats on getting in on Nebula!! You once told me that you'd love to, and now you're there. Awesome. (Also, I know it's been about two weeks since you posted this and you probably won't see it, but I'm super happy for you.)

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  11 месяцев назад

      Thanks! It's been a long time coming. It should provide some stability 👍

  • @CristianLopez-xi4rt
    @CristianLopez-xi4rt Год назад +4

    10:51 I guess cancel culture has been here all along 😂

  • @jasonremy1627
    @jasonremy1627 Год назад +2

    Nice collab!

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Год назад +2

      Thanks! We're friends, so making cameos in each other's videos isn't uncommon.

  • @alfadog67
    @alfadog67 Год назад +2

    I just love the historical perspective you show us! Thanks Professor Nick!