i dont get why you feel the need to be intentionally awkward and hard to deal with, when all the officers are doing is their job, they havent gone to the location for no reason they have been called there, treat them like a normal person because if you are awkward to them they will be awkward to you. simple
What don't you get?! The reason - the one and only reasons. Is to provoke confrontation to make better content - which makes more views - which makes more money. Forget his behaviour it's basically interactive theatre. Money is the motive.
So, you refuse to leave private property when asked by the representative of the land owner (yes a tenant counts). They are then entitled to use reasonable force to escort you from their land. That does not constitute assault.
@@noble6894You can only take civil action if they've done something wrong in the incident. People can't take civil action just because their ego got hurt
They do 100 hours training, and then get paid about the same as a newly qualified nurse after 3yrs at degree level then 1 year of mentoring, seems fair?
What about he batty eyelashes never mind the law !!! These cops must obey the law and enforce the law not their feelings and discretion !!! This cult organisation must obey the laws just as everybody else has to !!!
Arrogance? Maybe. But nobody did anything wrong here They can ask him to leave and use minimal/reasonable force to remove him You know that right? I can criticise their attitude with you all day. But there just wasn't anything wrong done here today. There's no assault it was perfectly legal
@@davepegington9066 The cult members should have called the coppers to remove their victims. Putting hands on and claiming you are doing it because this is your property is still an assault. Security guards are to observe and report, only.
@@adcolt54 no it isn't. You can keep howling it all night That doesn't make it so You can legally remove someone using reasonable force. The legal criteria for assault isn't met That's the bottom line of it whether you like it or not is irrelevant But personally I'm happy with the law. Because it means I get to use reasonable force to remove a trespasser too. (and I have) But it's quite clear you're not interested in the law. You just want to claim the police are always wrong regardless of facts and your team. (Whoever they happen to be) are always right regardless of facts Don't be such a d1ck. Use your critical thinking skills and make judgements based on facts and logic instead of emotions. Like a child I repeat again. Auditor was asked to leave Refused Reasonable force was used There's no argument here whatsoever. Just petulant childish whining
APPEARS TO BE CRAWLING WARFARE OF A JEWISH POLICE GULAG HUMAN TRAFFICKING STATE. REMBER POLICE ARE BI-POLAR DISSORDER.COMMUNIST JEWISH/SIRIA STATE STARTING 70S TO NOW AS SANGUINARY MASS BIPOLAR FOSTER CHILDREN. PATHOLOGICAL LIES IS TIP OF ICE BERG WITHESE SANGUINE PEOPLES OF ANY COLOR OF THEM. AS SOVIET UNION WAS/IS 1937-85 AS MASS MIGRANTS INFLUX 73 ONWARDS.FOSTER TOWNS CITIES OF THESE SANGUINARY ADULTS CHILDREN IN AUTHORITY.
Of course it has. You're not going to get an intelligent person to do your dirty work, are you? The only qualification needed these days is to be gullible.
It has. Genuinely. It went out with height and fitness requirements. This is how you end up with tattooed thugs with massive holes in their ears bullying people around, and 5 foot snidey women pretending to be law enforcement when in reality they're revenue collectors who don't GAF about British values.
APPEARS TO BE CRAWLING WARFARE OF A JEWISH POLICE GULAG HUMAN TRAFFICKING STATE. REMBER POLICE ARE BI-POLAR DISSORDER.COMMUNIST JEWISH/SIRIA STATE STARTING 70S TO NOW AS SANGUINARY MASS BIPOLAR FOSTER CHILDREN. PATHOLOGICAL LIES IS TIP OF ICE BERG WITHESE SANGUINE PEOPLES OF ANY COLOR OF THEM. AS SOVIET UNION WAS/IS 1937-85 AS MASS MIGRANTS INFLUX 73 ONWARDS.FOSTER TOWNS CITIES OF THESE SANGUINARY ADULTS CHILDREN IN AUTHORITY.
The best punishment for a Scientologist is being a Scientologist. Being one of those screwballs is a terrible fate and an expensive fate as well, they deserve it.
I have seen it before but WPC eyelashes is ok isint she ohhhhhhhhh MATRON lol x it is just one rule for the force positions of power souless organizations and or souless establishments and another for us Good Human Beings isint it x
So they can use tazers and gas plus a button to protect themselves , however we the public have to wait for them to turn up and protect us. We should have the legal right to defend ourselves when out in public with legally allowed items.
Sorry but this doesn't apply The auditor was asked to leave and didn't Reasonable force was used. Well within the law. Other comments remark on police attitude. That may be so. But there just wasn't anything unlawful done here. Auditor trespassing told to leave and wouldn't. Minimal and legal force used Why would you want that to be in any way different, when it means you wouldn't be able to use reasonable force to remove a trespasser from your own house who refused to leave?? Be reasonable here
Halsbury’s Laws of England, Paragraph 1400, Volume 45, IVth Edition. “If a trespasser peaceably enters or is on land, the person who is in or entitled to possession may request him to leave, and if he refuses to leave may remove him from the land using no more force than is reasonably necessary."
They've been taught to automatically hate anybody with a camera with no exceptions! If the Scientology people had opened fire on you with a machine gun, you would still be in the wrong for having a camera.
So not having got his own way, he should have then launched into more affronted verbage? Halsbury’s Laws of England, Paragraph 1400, Volume 45, IVth Edition. “If a trespasser peaceably enters or is on land, the person who is in or entitled to possession may request him to leave, and if he refuses to leave may remove him from the land using no more force than is reasonably necessary."
@Audit-The-Auditors People in the building told them to leave the premises, which they did. The land owner did not tell them to leave the land. It is not trespass if you leave when asked. It is only trespass if you refuse to leave when asked. And Trespass is a civil matter not criminal.
@@bigbadcameraauditsuk5627 Force was used because he didn't leave. The land owner doesn't have to even be there: ' To justify the expulsion of a trespasser, the person who uses force must be in possession or acting under the authority of the person in possession.' No-one said it was criminal. Yes, a civil matter dealt with by common law.
@Audit-The-Auditors Common Law (R v Griffiths 1988) If you have an honestly held belief that you or another, are in imminent danger, then you may use such force as is reasonable and necessary to avert that danger. That was not the situation here.
Because police uphold common law. Halsbury’s Laws of England, Paragraph 1400, Volume 45, IVth Edition. “If a trespasser peaceably enters or is on land, the person who is in or entitled to possession may request him to leave, and if he refuses to leave may remove him from the land using no more force than is reasonably necessary."
Breach of the peace Regina versus Howell also 1982 states a breach of the peace occurs when someone has the fear of being harmed to give someone the fear of being harmed you have to use threatening and or abusive language or hold a threatening and or abusive sign. The wording is very important. It also goes on to say once a breach of the peace has passed there is no breach of the peace IT'S PASSED. The police have no powers to demand a name and address and no powers to detain. Seeing as the corrupt tyrant pigs are there I would say the breach of the peace has passed. No wonder every one loathes these gang members. The tyrant pigs are not here for us the public anymore. They are a corrupt parliamentary army for the ruling elite. DON'T help them in anyway only way they will learn how sick we are sick of them abusing are rights.
Well said, we all need to stand up to these pig's and not allow them to abuse their powers to oppress and stifle our human and civil rights, unfortunately the sheeple will blindly follow directions and do as they're told, whilst the minority like ourselves will continue to stand up for ourselves.
Just looked it up.. A Public Place is . Any highway and any other premises or place to which at the material time, the public have or permitted to have access, whether on payment or otherwise. Section 33 Criminal Justice Act 1972.
@@BareBritainAudits Yes. I think if you had it on a card or off by heart you'd really call them out. By the way , I'm a retired Policeman, I joined in 1969 and I can remember we had to know about that , we were taught it at Training School.
@@BareBritainAudits And once any implied right of access has been removed, then you become a trespasser. Halsbury’s Laws of England, Paragraph 1400, Volume 45, IVth Edition. “If a trespasser peaceably enters or is on land, the person who is in or entitled to possession may request him to leave, and if he refuses to leave may remove him from the land using no more force than is reasonably necessary."
I mean it's really not that hard to understand... you were on private property without permission, they wanted you off , you refused and got assaulted in the process then they were called to see what's going on. It seems to me you've been recording for quite a while if you were assaulted you could've showed them the footage, or like you said it's a civil matter should've left and pressed charges. The pictures of you that they took was also on private property that they own the rights for so any photography that doesn't breach your right to privacy isn't any legal issue, and it cannot be since you were outside in public 🤷🏻♀️ I do agree it could've been handled much better, though, she did come at you with attitude, and it did get progressively worse however you refusing to answer any questions didn't really help either though
@wiccanwarrior9 none wear hats anymore....they just look like a load of tramps....gadgets strapped all over them...disgraceful uniform. Seen some cops, filthy shoes crumpled trousers...dirty vests. How can you take these battered action toys seriously. ?
Some of the comments on here :-) I would suggest that 90% of the people commenting on this forum wouldn't have the courage to do what these 2 officers are doing on a daily basis. It really does show a low level of intelligence when you attack how someone looks i.e. "Her false eyelashes". Lets be honest for a lot of you the most dangerous thing you possible do on a daily basis is get out of bed and think. I presume those officers can go home and at least say to their partners and, or families that they've tried their hardest to make a difference to those in need. Honest question, apart from sitting behind the safety of your keyboard. What difference have you made today to peoples lifes? what courage have you shown. My guess is very little to what these new officers are doing on a daily basis.
there is a lot of stigma against police officers in general especially in western countries, most of the people who watch these "auditing" channels are anarchists who have that "all cops are bad" mentality and wanna see them defunded or they think they are all corrupt. I have seen so much criticism in this comment section that it is actually embarrassing, people seem to neglect the fact that you need to have actual qualifications to get into the force and i absolutely doubt that most people commenting hate against these 2 have more than basic GCSEs and maybe a shitty college degree, since the type of people who go out of their way to find these videos arent usually the smart type. They're like a hivemind tunnel visioned on hating the police for the sake of it, and viewing all these other comments form braindead people alike reinforces their agenda that cops in this country are doing nothing useful now im not saying that having lots of qualifications automatically makes you good at the job, but the "children in uniform" and "zero qualifications" claims ive seen commented are nothing but thoughtless bias against the police done with no research in mind
Looks like Barbie and Ken in a Police vertion of Baywatch. You have got to love the little hand crafted map it's definitely worth a Blue Peter Badge🤡 🤣
Here are two candidates for salon worker if they had the intelligence and personal skills to communicate with the public. They would require a further six months training to be able to paint nails at a beauty salon. I’m not sure if they would be capable of it. Just my opinion
Civilised citizens uses their intelligence rather then steeping into someone land for conflict! And Civilised citizen will politely say sir you are trespassing the private property maybe by mistake!
Good training for those two police officers. How to deal with a petulant child. Despite all the prodding and goading from the so-called auditor they kept calm. That's more than can be said for the auditor.
I would love to see an ‘auditors abroad’ episode (a spin off from idiot abroad but dumber). Viewers could fund you to travel to Russia, China, North Korea, Middle East and even Western European countries like France… just so we can see how the police there deal with your behaviour and then make a comparison to our own authorities. It might broaden your knowledge about your human rights and civil liberties here in the UK. Please please can we start a go fund me???? 😁🙏
is this what jayne torvill and christopher dean are doing now wow should get there skates on and do one well handled they was a disgrace not following the law
The woman is ignorant, the man told her making a video about Scientology and she said “regarding”. When she was caught out as making a stupid statement she started getting arsey.
The owner or 'their authorised agent' is the usual legal term - I'm a council tenant, not a land/property owner, but if I tell you to get out of my flat and you don't, you're trespassing. Same in a supermarket, for instance - the guy that collects the trolleys wouldn't be able to tell me shit, but managers and supervisors could bar me for whatever reason. I'd imagine a similar structure exists within the 'church' of scientology, but as they're notoriously tight lipped about what happens behind closed doors in the cult, it's hard to say.
State of the eye lashes - how unprofessional is that looks so pathetic - they look like just come out of 6th form - dear dear me how can you respect kids who have seen nothing in life. Why are they putting immature kid sin these situations. Why crime and violence is rife and all these kids focus on is tweets and non hate crime - the state of the police is a real concern.
So many are auditing these days that I think the UK laws will be changed. if this happens, people who really need to film the baddies may not be allowed. and I will miss AB's "Auditing Britain." He is at least very funny.
Coppers just out of play school should by law be required to wear a arm band letting the public know they are learning how to do the job just as a learner driver And they get to drive a noddy car as well bless them
These idiots need to know the definition of a ' Public Place. ' . It is Any place that is a Public Place , or, any place ,that is open to the public on payment or otherwise., It's a bit more than that but that's the crux.
Once any implied right of access has been removed. Halsbury’s Laws of England, Paragraph 1400, Volume 45, IVth Edition. “If a trespasser peaceably enters or is on land, the person who is in or entitled to possession may request him to leave, and if he refuses to leave may remove him from the land using no more force than is reasonably necessary." Therefore hands can be used to remove.
@@Audit-The-Auditors Yes , this is true, but these laws are continuously changed by legal challenges , Case Law. Trespass in itself is a minefield. So is , What is ' Reasonable Force, " not necessarily laying hands on. Which in itself is " Common Assault.' Trespass in it'self is not a criminal offence, But can be included with other criminal offences, e.g. The theft Act 1968. Aggravated Burglary . The best line of use for the auditors, is to use The definition of a ' Public Place ' as defined by Sec. 33 of the Criminal Justice Act 1972. As a case for argument at the time. But maybe retreat as the better part of defence if necessary or be prepared to defend the challenge in court. It is likely though , armed with this knowledge, you could go a long way..
@@ianford5113 Justifiably laying hands on is not still an assault. No-one claimed trespass is a criminal offence. The above appears to be very clear, they entered and were told to leave, refused, so reasonable force was used to eject. No mines were detonated, other than the compromised ego of the auditor.
@@Audit-The-Auditors ok.!! Were only as good as the video. Without seeing how near ,' The Highway ' is, but it maybe is right next to the leadin to the car park and entrance. Then it comes within the definition of a ' Public Place.' Regardless of them waving the land registry paper around, and that forefront being owned by someone, ( as all land in the UK is.) If the auditors had been subject to a ' Common Assault ' on that bit of land, Not in the building past the door entrance, a physical barrier indicating privacy, then those two excuses for Constables, should have reported the offender or offenders for intended prosecution, it's not their job ,to be judge and jury, they should present the case to a court and let that court decide.its not clear where the assault took place either, just basing this on the video.
@@ianford5113 You are completely wrong, The officers attended and determined the most appropriate outcome based upon the evidence. It was clear why the auditor was there and he even confirmed he was instructed to leave. Common law provided the authority to physically remove. There was no assault.
Neighbour had her garage broken into, phoned the police, guess what they turn up. But if you trespass which is a civil matter you know that thy turn up
English Common Law Trespass (Halsbury's Laws of England), if you refuse to leave privately owned property when asked to do so by the owner or an agent of the owner (Staff Member), the owner or agent of the owner can remove you using reasonable force.
So when your a victim of Assault, you have to give your job situation???? What has that got to do with it? "Oh sorry, we aren't going to pursue the charge of Assault as you are currently out of work" lol
No assault took place. Halsbury’s Laws of England, Paragraph 1400, Volume 45, IVth Edition. “If a trespasser peaceably enters or is on land, the person who is in or entitled to possession may request him to leave, and if he refuses to leave may remove him from the land using no more force than is reasonably necessary."
i dont get why you feel the need to be intentionally awkward and hard to deal with, when all the officers are doing is their job, they havent gone to the location for no reason they have been called there, treat them like a normal person because if you are awkward to them they will be awkward to you. simple
Cause he’s had no life.
What don't you get?! The reason - the one and only reasons. Is to provoke confrontation to make better content - which makes more views - which makes more money. Forget his behaviour it's basically interactive theatre. Money is the motive.
@@jman6587and there's nothing wrong with that
@@FoFilm5That policewoman just stares blankly. Is she high?
Because he's got nowt better to do but to wind people up.
Oh I'm sorry he's doing the nebulously defined role of "holding them accountable."
So, you refuse to leave private property when asked by the representative of the land owner (yes a tenant counts). They are then entitled to use reasonable force to escort you from their land. That does not constitute assault.
He wants them to use force so he can sue them for money
@@noble6894You can only take civil action if they've done something wrong in the incident. People can't take civil action just because their ego got hurt
We can't expect them to be very well trained when a hairdresser gets about 4 years training to their few months. It shows!
The more I watch these YT audits, it seems most police officers go through zero training.
They do 100 hours training, and then get paid about the same as a newly qualified nurse after 3yrs at degree level then 1 year of mentoring, seems fair?
Actually, the basic police training lasts two years when you include the probationary period.
@@barneybiggles 2 years training actually.
I see the piggy bloke even looks like a pig
What about he batty eyelashes never mind the law !!! These cops must obey the law and enforce the law not their feelings and discretion !!! This cult organisation must obey the laws just as everybody else has to !!!
Pity there not as interested in the grooming gangs......
You can see the love in her eyes missed her perr
Gary Hart: They're can't be interested in the grooming gangs because that would be racist.
Torvill n Dean need to skate off in Cruise control, totally out of their depth 👍
Clever. Haha
I think it was Dean, that was a Constable in the Nottinghamshire Constabulary.!!
@@ianford5113 That's correct my friend, from 1974 to 1980, he was a police constable with Nottinghamshire Police 👍
She has arrogance dripping from her tyrant in the making!
Ive got a parrot that dont screach half as much as her ✌️✌️🇬🇧🇬🇧
Arrogance? Maybe. But nobody did anything wrong here
They can ask him to leave and use minimal/reasonable force to remove him
You know that right?
I can criticise their attitude with you all day.
But there just wasn't anything wrong done here today.
There's no assault it was perfectly legal
@@davepegington9066 The cult members should have called the coppers to remove their victims. Putting hands on and claiming you are doing it because this is your property is still an assault. Security guards are to observe and report, only.
@@adcolt54 no it isn't.
You can keep howling it all night
That doesn't make it so
You can legally remove someone using reasonable force.
The legal criteria for assault isn't met
That's the bottom line of it whether you like it or not is irrelevant
But personally I'm happy with the law. Because it means I get to use reasonable force to remove a trespasser too. (and I have)
But it's quite clear you're not interested in the law.
You just want to claim the police are always wrong regardless of facts and your team. (Whoever they happen to be) are always right regardless of facts
Don't be such a d1ck.
Use your critical thinking skills and make judgements based on facts and logic instead of emotions. Like a child
I repeat again.
Auditor was asked to leave
Refused
Reasonable force was used
There's no argument here whatsoever. Just petulant childish whining
Would you though?
PC Hammond the female officer
Can't have attended police training at all what a complete embarrassment, she comes across as awful
And a bit lost looking.
APPEARS TO BE CRAWLING WARFARE OF A JEWISH POLICE GULAG HUMAN TRAFFICKING STATE. REMBER POLICE ARE BI-POLAR DISSORDER.COMMUNIST JEWISH/SIRIA STATE STARTING 70S TO NOW AS SANGUINARY MASS BIPOLAR FOSTER CHILDREN. PATHOLOGICAL LIES IS TIP OF ICE BERG WITHESE SANGUINE PEOPLES OF ANY COLOR OF THEM. AS SOVIET UNION WAS/IS 1937-85 AS MASS MIGRANTS INFLUX 73 ONWARDS.FOSTER TOWNS CITIES OF THESE SANGUINARY ADULTS CHILDREN IN AUTHORITY.
I thought she handled it fairly well
Well this is what happens when you only recruit students from university.
I'm sure the level of intelligence to get into the police has deliberately been lowered!
Of course it has. You're not going to get an intelligent person to do your dirty work, are you? The only qualification needed these days is to be gullible.
It has. Genuinely.
It went out with height and fitness requirements.
This is how you end up with tattooed thugs with massive holes in their ears bullying people around, and 5 foot snidey women pretending to be law enforcement when in reality they're revenue collectors who don't GAF about British values.
APPEARS TO BE CRAWLING WARFARE OF A JEWISH POLICE GULAG HUMAN TRAFFICKING STATE. REMBER POLICE ARE BI-POLAR DISSORDER.COMMUNIST JEWISH/SIRIA STATE STARTING 70S TO NOW AS SANGUINARY MASS BIPOLAR FOSTER CHILDREN. PATHOLOGICAL LIES IS TIP OF ICE BERG WITHESE SANGUINE PEOPLES OF ANY COLOR OF THEM. AS SOVIET UNION WAS/IS 1937-85 AS MASS MIGRANTS INFLUX 73 ONWARDS.FOSTER TOWNS CITIES OF THESE SANGUINARY ADULTS CHILDREN IN AUTHORITY.
it has , becuase they are more likely to blindly follow orders from the government with no moral compass
@@CavalierFitness As are women in general.
National database for all serving constables including name, number, station, and mugshot.
Remove qualified immunity.
There are several already. Just dont use a censored internet youll find them easy
Yeah because the likes of ISIS and domestic terrorists wouldn't find that particularly helpful would they? Oh wait....
@@thefiestaguy8831 🤣🤣🤣🤣 surely that comment is a joke right 😅
WPC 4172. Her false eyelashes are too heavy for her eyelids! Look at her blinking away!
They do make her look pretty though.
@@adburn1066 pretty scary
If she had flipped them any faster she might have lift off. Better than a load of gang tats though.
Excuse me rude 😢 she's my wife
Wah ha ha ha haaaaaaaa!!! You wish!
Keep saying, they are all corrupt
It seams if anyone has a camera you are the guilty person.
Oh yeah? Guilty of what? And how can it be articulated?
The best punishment for a Scientologist is being a Scientologist. Being one of those screwballs is a terrible fate and an expensive fate as well, they deserve it.
What is more worrying & very suspicious is what are these places hiding ? Why all the secrecy ?
The auditing cult doesn't hide though.
It’s a mad cult they just want to stop people realising it’s all built on nonsensical rubbish
Scientology?
let the cops stumble into violations themselves, no need to guide them it makes you look kinda insecure.
I have seen it before but WPC eyelashes is ok isint she ohhhhhhhhh MATRON lol x it is just one rule for the force positions of power souless organizations and or souless establishments and another for us Good Human Beings isint it x
They "train" for a poxy 12 weeks. An insult to the meaning "Academy"
If it was any long they fall asleep😂😂😂
Actually probationary police training lasts for two years.
@@Audit-The-Auditors That'll be the hands on 2 years training then ,Very appropriate, "HANDS ON" their very good at that part.
@@Noseypoke-mr7th I have no clue what you're attempting to illustrate?
@@Audit-The-Auditors This is one of the very few audits were cops have NOT laid "HANDS ON" the auditor, but I suppose we are only in PART 1
They would arrest you as the person in there would be willing to give details where as your not. So the cops are right. You are wrong simple!
Policing in the 21st Century.
Nothing like wasting tax payer money and taking police away from being where they are actually needed. Fool.
I can't look at silly birds that do that to their eyebrows without laughing...
So they can use tazers and gas plus a button to protect themselves , however we the public have to wait for them to turn up and protect us.
We should have the legal right to defend ourselves when out in public with legally allowed items.
Sorry but this doesn't apply
The auditor was asked to leave and didn't
Reasonable force was used. Well within the law.
Other comments remark on police attitude. That may be so. But there just wasn't anything unlawful done here.
Auditor trespassing told to leave and wouldn't.
Minimal and legal force used
Why would you want that to be in any way different, when it means you wouldn't be able to use reasonable force to remove a trespasser from your own house who refused to leave??
Be reasonable here
You gave up your guns like good little NPCs... the police state in the uk will get worse.
@@nomadiclapse I didn't
@@davepegington9066 was I addressing you specifically muppet?
You in this context means the UK.
@@davepegington9066 Did he refuse to leave?
The ridiculous eyelashes 🙄
Sexist shhit
I agree, it's like watching 2 Tarantulas screaming for attention 👍
You don't answer questions unless you're found to be breaking the law...yet, all you do is go on to answer all their questions
NO HE'S ANSWERING THEIR STUPID QUESTIONS TO KNOCK THEM BACK..TO EDUCATE THEM
Corporate policy officers
First day on job - nervous adjustment of uniform in mirror. Second day on job - attempted violation of citizens rights.
quiet you freak
The Cult of Scientology vs The Cult of Auditing!!!
You couldn't make it up.
Coppers always know the way out of taking any action and they know you will get a letter saying no further action…. Waste of time
Jeepers creepers, where did she get those peepers??? Children in uniform again!
Halsbury’s Laws of England, Paragraph 1400, Volume 45, IVth Edition.
“If a trespasser peaceably enters or is on land, the person who is in or entitled to possession may request him to leave, and if he refuses to leave may remove him from the land using no more force than is reasonably necessary."
They've been taught to automatically hate anybody with a camera with no exceptions! If the Scientology people had opened fire on you with a machine gun, you would still be in the wrong for having a camera.
ANOTHER CHARGE WOULD BE STEALING LEAD FROM A SUDO RELIGIOUS PREMICES
Has that woman copper got FALSE EYELASHES on ? Ffs..
Yes they stop her hat blocking her eyes 😂😂😂😂
police are not always bad, they just trying to figure out whats gone on and when they get the call they have no clue so they have to ask
Well done for standing your ground and remaining calm.
A few more home truths of the force and constables involved wouldn't have gone a miss
So not having got his own way, he should have then launched into more affronted verbage?
Halsbury’s Laws of England, Paragraph 1400, Volume 45, IVth Edition.
“If a trespasser peaceably enters or is on land, the person who is in or entitled to possession may request him to leave, and if he refuses to leave may remove him from the land using no more force than is reasonably necessary."
@Audit-The-Auditors
People in the building told them to leave the premises, which they did.
The land owner did not tell them to leave the land.
It is not trespass if you leave when asked. It is only trespass if you refuse to leave when asked.
And Trespass is a civil matter not criminal.
@@bigbadcameraauditsuk5627 Force was used because he didn't leave.
The land owner doesn't have to even be there: ' To justify the expulsion of a trespasser, the person who uses force must be in possession or acting under the authority of the person in possession.'
No-one said it was criminal. Yes, a civil matter dealt with by common law.
@Audit-The-Auditors
Common Law (R v Griffiths 1988)
If you have an honestly held belief that you or another, are in imminent danger, then you may use such force as is reasonable and necessary to avert that danger.
That was not the situation here.
@@bigbadcameraauditsuk5627 It wasn't, so why quote it? What are you trying to hide?
I think these officers have been very polite and listened these two idiots who are just trying to aggravate any situation to get a response
The Milky bar kid and barbie😂😂😂😂pathetic
Good to see Ray Mears back.
Trespassing is a civil matter and not a criminal matter, so why are the involved in this matter
Because police uphold common law.
Halsbury’s Laws of England, Paragraph 1400, Volume 45, IVth Edition.
“If a trespasser peaceably enters or is on land, the person who is in or entitled to possession may request him to leave, and if he refuses to leave may remove him from the land using no more force than is reasonably necessary."
Very well said BBA..
Brit police are so wholesome
Breach of the peace Regina versus Howell also 1982 states a breach of the peace occurs when someone has the fear of being harmed to give someone the fear of being harmed you have to use threatening and or abusive language or hold a threatening and or abusive sign. The wording is very important. It also goes on to say once a breach of the peace has passed there is no breach of the peace IT'S PASSED. The police have no powers to demand a name and address and no powers to detain. Seeing as the corrupt tyrant pigs are there I would say the breach of the peace has passed. No wonder every one loathes these gang members. The tyrant pigs are not here for us the public anymore. They are a corrupt parliamentary army for the ruling elite. DON'T help them in anyway only way they will learn how sick we are sick of them abusing are rights.
Well said, we all need to stand up to these pig's and not allow them to abuse their powers to oppress and stifle our human and civil rights, unfortunately the sheeple will blindly follow directions and do as they're told, whilst the minority like ourselves will continue to stand up for ourselves.
Well said Chris
Just looked it up.. A Public Place is . Any highway and any other premises or place to which at the material time, the public have or permitted to have access, whether on payment or otherwise. Section 33 Criminal Justice Act 1972.
So a church open to the public applies ✌🏻💯
@@BareBritainAudits Yes. I think if you had it on a card or off by heart you'd really call them out. By the way , I'm a retired Policeman, I joined in 1969 and I can remember we had to know about that , we were taught it at Training School.
@@BareBritainAudits And once any implied right of access has been removed, then you become a trespasser.
Halsbury’s Laws of England, Paragraph 1400, Volume 45, IVth Edition.
“If a trespasser peaceably enters or is on land, the person who is in or entitled to possession may request him to leave, and if he refuses to leave may remove him from the land using no more force than is reasonably necessary."
bros getting wide with police
I mean it's really not that hard to understand... you were on private property without permission, they wanted you off , you refused and got assaulted in the process then they were called to see what's going on.
It seems to me you've been recording for quite a while if you were assaulted you could've showed them the footage, or like you said it's a civil matter should've left and pressed charges.
The pictures of you that they took was also on private property that they own the rights for so any photography that doesn't breach your right to privacy isn't any legal issue, and it cannot be since you were outside in public 🤷🏻♀️
I do agree it could've been handled much better, though, she did come at you with attitude, and it did get progressively worse however you refusing to answer any questions didn't really help either though
Hands in pockets... hands tucked in vest...cops are so slovenly....
@wiccanwarrior9 none wear hats anymore....they just look like a load of tramps....gadgets strapped all over them...disgraceful uniform. Seen some cops, filthy shoes crumpled trousers...dirty vests. How can you take these battered action toys seriously. ?
Get to some more hotels. Because its time to fight back ..ENGLAND 💪.
You mean the World Cup? It's over mate. Too late to get a hotel now.
If she get fluttering them eyelashes she going to take off 😂😂tyrants in the making we see 😢
Keep up the good work Officers.
Some of the comments on here :-) I would suggest that 90% of the people commenting on this forum wouldn't have the courage to do what these 2 officers are doing on a daily basis. It really does show a low level of intelligence when you attack how someone looks i.e. "Her false eyelashes". Lets be honest for a lot of you the most dangerous thing you possible do on a daily basis is get out of bed and think. I presume those officers can go home and at least say to their partners and, or families that they've tried their hardest to make a difference to those in need. Honest question, apart from sitting behind the safety of your keyboard. What difference have you made today to peoples lifes? what courage have you shown. My guess is very little to what these new officers are doing on a daily basis.
😂😂😂😂 here is a 🏆
Well said!
there is a lot of stigma against police officers in general especially in western countries, most of the people who watch these "auditing" channels are anarchists who have that "all cops are bad" mentality and wanna see them defunded or they think they are all corrupt. I have seen so much criticism in this comment section that it is actually embarrassing, people seem to neglect the fact that you need to have actual qualifications to get into the force and i absolutely doubt that most people commenting hate against these 2 have more than basic GCSEs and maybe a shitty college degree, since the type of people who go out of their way to find these videos arent usually the smart type. They're like a hivemind tunnel visioned on hating the police for the sake of it, and viewing all these other comments form braindead people alike reinforces their agenda that cops in this country are doing nothing useful
now im not saying that having lots of qualifications automatically makes you good at the job, but the "children in uniform" and "zero qualifications" claims ive seen commented are nothing but thoughtless bias against the police done with no research in mind
This is frustrating.
2 Auditors talking over each other.
What a weird bloke going around harrassing police. Why not go and bother politicians who have destroyed the police service?
What a strange. Comment 🙄
@@BareBritainAuditsnot really. Why not do something productive instead of being a 🔔🔚
@@LBRacingCars what do you call productive??
Its like watching a training exercise for young officers which they have failed 1000%
Looks like Barbie and Ken in a Police vertion of Baywatch. You have got to love the little hand crafted map it's definitely worth a Blue Peter Badge🤡 🤣
Here are two candidates for salon worker if they had the intelligence and personal skills to communicate with the public. They would require a further six months training to be able to paint nails at a beauty salon. I’m not sure if they would be capable of it. Just my opinion
Just watch the Louis Therroux documentry on the church when his was investingating them in the USA.
That officer is a cutie, she can take down my particulars any time 😂
What is going on with her eyelashes 🤷♂️ all stuck together like something has gone all over her face 😂 wonder what it was 😮
SPONK
Civilised citizens uses their intelligence rather then steeping into someone land for conflict! And Civilised citizen will politely say sir you are trespassing the private property maybe by mistake!
Good training for those two police officers. How to deal with a petulant child. Despite all the prodding and goading from the so-called auditor they kept calm. That's more than can be said for the auditor.
Is she allowed to have pet caterpillars on her eyelids?
Which legislation would be contravened?
The protection of wildlife act?🤔
More like straight out of the nursery not only the cops but those who phoned for them
Good work. But don't call them" Sir", you put them over you in deferential manner. Which of course ,they lap it up as an ego boost.
Exactly "constable" is all that's needed.
I would love to see an ‘auditors abroad’ episode (a spin off from idiot abroad but dumber). Viewers could fund you to travel to Russia, China, North Korea, Middle East and even Western European countries like France… just so we can see how the police there deal with your behaviour and then make a comparison to our own authorities. It might broaden your knowledge about your human rights and civil liberties here in the UK. Please please can we start a go fund me???? 😁🙏
Great idea let me know once you raised the money I will need 🫡💯
@@BareBritainAudits I’d imagine you’ll only need a one way ticket mate so shouldn’t be too much! 🇨🇳 🇰🇵 🇸🇦 🇷🇺 🇫🇷 👍🏼
@templeacoustic-uk you do realise your point is totally invalid right? I bet you 1 of the same morons that voted Labour 🙄🙄🙄
is this what jayne torvill and christopher dean are doing now wow should get there skates on and do one well handled they was a disgrace not following the law
Excellent 👍
I went and stood on the public footpath and I had a problem with them filming-WTF!
The woman is ignorant, the man told her making a video about Scientology and she said “regarding”. When she was caught out as making a stupid statement she started getting arsey.
These two really did just fall off the tray in the sausage making plant 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. Great video my friend 🤘🤘💯🤘💯🤘💯
"children hiding in cupboards" ?? ...
maybe to power kitchen machinery with some kind of generator 😱
All these comments i just filled with people who spend there time in Wetherspoons all day and are bored😂😂 tragic😂
What pepper spray is it??
Our research 😂😂😂
That woman copper should be in prison anyway with them outrageous eye lashes, outraging public decency.
broo, british police aint policing anymore
" 🇬🇧 Bare Britain Investigates 🇬🇧" sounds better then. "Bare Britain Audits" 👍
Why would somebody's employment status be relevant to the Police, for them to investigate an alleged assault?
I think she'd be more suited to Onlyfans than the police.
Imagine being this difficult 😂😂 they started off sound with you 😂
That paper may come from the landowner but doesn't the landowner have to be there to say they want you off the property??
It would be a bit ridiculous if true but I don't know.
The owner or 'their authorised agent' is the usual legal term - I'm a council tenant, not a land/property owner, but if I tell you to get out of my flat and you don't, you're trespassing.
Same in a supermarket, for instance - the guy that collects the trolleys wouldn't be able to tell me shit, but managers and supervisors could bar me for whatever reason.
I'd imagine a similar structure exists within the 'church' of scientology, but as they're notoriously tight lipped about what happens behind closed doors in the cult, it's hard to say.
why wear fake eyelashes
Her eyes say it all
State of the eye lashes - how unprofessional is that looks so pathetic - they look like just come out of 6th form - dear dear me how can you respect kids who have seen nothing in life. Why are they putting immature kid sin these situations. Why crime and violence is rife and all these kids focus on is tweets and non hate crime - the state of the police is a real concern.
So many are auditing these days that I think the UK laws will be changed. if this happens, people who really need to film the baddies may not be allowed. and I will miss AB's "Auditing Britain." He is at least very funny.
oh it could change right enough but as you said not for the better, it will just be more draconian
@@awhisperinthewind4253 Think that was the point
She was fit aswell, shame she a cop😔
Who trains them ...Avon ? ✌️✌️🇬🇧🇬🇧
Coppers just out of play school should by law be required to wear a arm band letting the public know they are learning how to do the job just as a learner driver And they get to drive a noddy car as well bless them
Where did you pull that from
Clearly straight out the salon with those lashes 😊😊😊😊
Somebody must have told the splitarse that false eyelashes look attractive. They dont love, you look ridiculous.
What on earth gives young women nowadays the impression that two dead bats hanging from their eyelids is a good look !?
These idiots need to know the definition of a ' Public Place. ' . It is Any place that is a Public Place , or, any place ,that is open to the public on payment or otherwise., It's a bit more than that but that's the crux.
Once any implied right of access has been removed.
Halsbury’s Laws of England, Paragraph 1400, Volume 45, IVth Edition.
“If a trespasser peaceably enters or is on land, the person who is in or entitled to possession may request him to leave, and if he refuses to leave may remove him from the land using no more force than is reasonably necessary."
Therefore hands can be used to remove.
@@Audit-The-Auditors Yes , this is true, but these laws are continuously changed by legal challenges , Case Law. Trespass in itself is a minefield. So is , What is ' Reasonable Force, " not necessarily laying hands on. Which in itself is " Common Assault.' Trespass in it'self is not a criminal offence, But can be included with other criminal offences, e.g. The theft Act 1968. Aggravated Burglary . The best line of use for the auditors, is to use The definition of a ' Public Place ' as defined by Sec. 33 of the Criminal Justice Act 1972. As a case for argument at the time. But maybe retreat as the better part of defence if necessary or be prepared to defend the challenge in court. It is likely though , armed with this knowledge, you could go a long way..
@@ianford5113 Justifiably laying hands on is not still an assault. No-one claimed trespass is a criminal offence.
The above appears to be very clear, they entered and were told to leave, refused, so reasonable force was used to eject.
No mines were detonated, other than the compromised ego of the auditor.
@@Audit-The-Auditors ok.!! Were only as good as the video. Without seeing how near ,' The Highway ' is, but it maybe is right next to the leadin to the car park and entrance. Then it comes within the definition of a ' Public Place.' Regardless of them waving the land registry paper around, and that forefront being owned by someone, ( as all land in the UK is.) If the auditors had been subject to a ' Common Assault ' on that bit of land, Not in the building past the door entrance, a physical barrier indicating privacy, then those two excuses for Constables, should have reported the offender or offenders for intended prosecution, it's not their job ,to be judge and jury, they should present the case to a court and let that court decide.its not clear where the assault took place either, just basing this on the video.
@@ianford5113 You are completely wrong, The officers attended and determined the most appropriate outcome based upon the evidence. It was clear why the auditor was there and he even confirmed he was instructed to leave. Common law provided the authority to physically remove.
There was no assault.
My god anyone must be able to join the sausage factory
Neighbour had her garage broken into, phoned the police, guess what they turn up. But if you trespass which is a civil matter you know that thy turn up
she is in danger of tripping over her fake eyelashes
English Common Law Trespass (Halsbury's Laws of England), if you refuse to leave privately owned property when asked to do so by the owner or an agent of the owner (Staff Member), the owner or agent of the owner can remove you using reasonable force.
4:07 Sidhu Moose wala 4:38 this was the best part
❤❤❤
Jhoota is here
The cult probably pays the filth large sums to turn blind eyes to their dubious shenanigans
The police always protect organisations rather than a member of the public
So when your a victim of Assault, you have to give your job situation???? What has that got to do with it? "Oh sorry, we aren't going to pursue the charge of Assault as you are currently out of work" lol
No assault took place.
Halsbury’s Laws of England, Paragraph 1400, Volume 45, IVth Edition.
“If a trespasser peaceably enters or is on land, the person who is in or entitled to possession may request him to leave, and if he refuses to leave may remove him from the land using no more force than is reasonably necessary."
“You go to their head office”.
“God?”