VW ID.4 GTX | Top Speed Acceleration 0-180 kph | AWD vs RWD comparison
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024
- Top speed acceleration time of the ID.4 GTX [AWD] comapred with the ID.4 Pro [RWD]. Some Top speed runs, Rolling accelerations between them, top speed noise level of the GTX. Basicly the sportiest test out there on my channel. Enjoy.
ID.Furkan VW ID.4 Master Sheet
docs.google.co...
Discord - EV Club - Join our growing group of EV enthusiasts!
/ discord
If you are interested in the latest ins and outs of the car please SUBSCRIBE [+ bell] on this channel so you wont miss any new videos
Thanks for stopping by and I see you again in the future!
Follow me on
/ id.furkan
/ idfurkan
#VolkswagenID4 #VWID4GTX #ID4GTX
![DDG & G Herbo - Nosey [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/I9Ra0Zc2NlQ/mqdefault.jpg)
This is not the end of the German Adventure.
What I found most interesting is the difference in time from 0 to 160. 0-100 is just 1.8 seconds difference. That doesn't play a huge role in everyday driving. But 0-160 is already 14 s difference. On the Autobahn, the non GTX seriously lacks "Überhohlprestige".
I think the best way to compare them is by the 0-150 time. 160 with the RWD takes just too long to lock at 160kph on gps, much quicker to 159 (162-163 on dash. You see the same with the GTX and 180, takes just too long to go on a clean 180 GPS value
I think Volkswagen would dispute your persistence in stating the range is the same. It isn’t, and you haven’t tested it either.
its continously within 1-3% of the consumption difference.. in real life thats maybe 3 to 12 km's if you drive at the same style. Thats for me the "same" when you consider the the amount of torque and power the GTX can deliver more when needed. If you are braking and accelerating every 5 km. sure the GTX will suffer 10-20% range hit, but normal highway driving its just too close to say GTX is consuming WAY more then the Pro. its just similiar, but the RWD wins it by 1-3% every time.
I noticed the instant consumption seemed to freeze during the earlier acceleration runs. I would expect to see 150KWh for the max, but saw 59. Must be another VW bug (a beetle? 😂).
It's 150 kW (power) vs 150 kwh/100km (battery capacity consumption per 100 km) choose wisely before expacting a nuclair power plant under the hood
Thanks for your video. Good stuff. Right now the ID.4 AWD, the Q4 E-Tron 50 and the Ioniq 5 AWD are my choices. But still have to wait since two of those are still not available in the USA. The ID.4 AWD is but very few and far between.
What good videos please that APP uses for the iD.4 with an IPHONE 12 or 13
Thank you very much for the comparison!
It make happy moment for me. Each of the auto is very good.
Over all in your opinion.. which is better GTX or the PRO?..
In what way you want to compare? The ultimate version is not available to spec. 1st max with awd. Because currently only DCC is available with sport suspension and the 1st max doesn't have the sport suspension. And with DCC you don't really need the sport suspension as extra.
Good made and very helpful. Thank you for your work.
I'm on a toss up between the Ioniq 5 ultimate awd and the gtx max. Can't actually decide
what is important for you. make a list. will make it easier
@@EV.Furkan wife and I have been doing that for a couple of days. We are leaning to the Ioniq, would have gone straight for that, but was offered a good price on the gtx at the dealer which made them more comparible. The Ioniq makes me smile, the gtx is the safe choice