I have one question in regards to comparing fees. If you highlight that the fund's MER is 0.19% does that include the avg MER of the underlying ETFs or is that expense in addition to that? Thx
I challenge you to make a global stocks ETF in an equal weight design, including a hedged version AND them both having no more than 3X the MER of your current global stock / hedged version ETFs. Not really interested in the equal weight S&P500 fund you have. Kill it off / funnel the current holders into the ones I suggested.
![[Quarterly Economic update Webinar] Will inflation spoil the equity party?](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DV4Y-Om9P3Y/mqdefault.jpg)
Speaker is wrong, cost is $1.9 per $1000 invested per year
It is very good information and any chance to get all powerpoint info? because I need listen a lot of times and write down notes.
I think a 36% allocation to Australia is too much of a home bias for my liking.
I have one question in regards to comparing fees. If you highlight that the fund's MER is 0.19% does that include the avg MER of the underlying ETFs or is that expense in addition to that? Thx
It includes everything
But once you include tax drag it basically becomes a 0.27% mer which is the same as VDHG
Their similar, but given VDHGs exposure to income assets, I'd say that makes them different. Everyone's "tax drag" is also different.
If you include the tax inefficiencies of VDHG (the underlying funds are not ETFs), DHHF is possibly cheaper.
Does Vanguard pay any taxes in Australia? Or are they another mega corp getting away with paying nothing to AUS?
To me, that's something to consider.
I challenge you to make a global stocks ETF in an equal weight design, including a hedged version AND them both having no more than 3X the MER of your current global stock / hedged version ETFs.
Not really interested in the equal weight S&P500 fund you have. Kill it off / funnel the current holders into the ones I suggested.