It is still a great video about nuclear power. Despite what has become outdated, it does do a good job of explaining it, and why we should go with nuclear power.
The Greeks used ground up Lead as a spice for food and drink. Similarly the people of the time this video was produced did not know it was dangerous to cell walls. It is a good tool when used well but not in the medical field. Still though. What a great historical video. I am glad it was uploaded. Thank you.
I thought that myself, until I realised that the giger counter noise can be added in post, and the rock could be any old rock at all, and the giger counter needle could be moved with puppetry. All of those things could be done with the technology of the time... HOWEVER, there were also a proliferation of chemistry sets that includes real uranium and real giger counters, so who knows maybe it WAS real. Radiation sickness was known for about 40-50 years before this was made, however, so I would expect a scientist to know its danger.
Totally! LFTR, IFR, et al are incredible technology that not only provides more energy per kilo of fissile material but without the needless high level waste of today's antique reactor designs. (lftr = lithium fluoride thorium reactor, ifr = integral fast reactor)
We hope new remake 'Astro Boy(Atom)' Animated films and TV series will be released again by the production of Walt Disney Animation Studio in the future beginning in the 2030s. Astro Boy Series truly look like and fit the Walt Disney Animation.
no mention of Lise Meitner who was cheated of the1944 Nobel prize for discovering induced fission of Uranium and who first hypothesized a fission chain reaction
I remember this documentary and it's educational because it's teaches about science. But I think Walt Disney should know that this person worked on Donald in Mathmagicland and that's a great educational cartoon.
I remember this movie and it's on Disney plus. But this movie came out after Peter Pan and before Lady and the Tramp. For Walt Disney, that means it's between the years of his movies.
The color version of the intro is available on 16mm educational films provided to Pinellas county FL schools. Hopefully, there are still copies available.
The world is not solid. We only perceive it to be. Molecules and atoms are not solid so how can solidity be made of non solid things. It is vibrations that make things seem solid or not.
Dieses phantastische Video durften wir Anfang der 60er Jahre auf dem Gymnasium sehen. Nicht nur eine unerschöpfliche Energiequelle für die Zivilisation, sondern auch paradiesische Zustände durch radioaktiven Dünger und radioaktive Futtermittel ! Bösedenker kommentierten: lieber fernsehfaul als radioaktiv ! TIP: Hirn einschalten :-)))
Dr. Heinz, the friendly doctor of Disney and NASA, was a scientist who's work researching high altitude effects on pilots used prisoners at Dachau. What a sweet guy he turned out to be. Look up Operation Paperclip.
Neither Eisenhower, nor Churchill nor de Gaulle mentioned gas chambers or holocaust. Eisenhower, who often said he hated Germans and killed more than a few by starvation and exposure after the war. He tells how he visited the camps immediately after the war -- and complains of how cruelly Jews were treated, nothing about systematic killing. Dr. Mengel did not conduct experiments. He was compassionate and German compassion did not fit the propaganda needs of the allies, so they made him a villain So why should I trust you?.
"Let the atom be a worker, not a soldier"... these words were written on a building in Pripjat, the city next to Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. 50,000 people lived there. Now it's a ghost town.
Ja sehr schön... Vor allem die tollen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten wie Atom-Antrieb für Düsenflugzeuge oder noch besser radioaktives Düngemittel.. seeehr schön, mjam mjam.. *ironie*
@smilexshoko nuclear power is actually fairly safe. the number of deaths caused by fossil fuel is a lot greater than the number caused by nuclear power, even with events like those in Fukushima and Chernobyl. honestly, look it up. statistically, fossil fuels are far FAR more dangerous to us both in the long and short term, the deaths just aren't publicised..
ok, anyone who thinks "Fukushima" is all the reason needed to abandon nuclear energy, listen up. 1) You seriously need to consider your favourite media outlet more critically. Fear and sensationalism sells copy and therefore ad space; even without any radiation deaths or cancers in all this time, every march all we hear about is the anniversary of the meltdowns - never of the ~20000 people killed by the quake and waves, or the destitute or dead evacuees. 2) Learn what becquerels and sieverts are. Then read up on Gôiainia, the Taiwan apartments, the Hiroshima survivors, etc. If nuclear radiation was as exceptionally deadly as you've been brought up to believe, these should be reports of mass death and cancer clusters. The stats say either no long term effect from doses thousands times what is found around Fukushima, or potentially beneficial, hormetic effects. 3) Read up on Onagawa nuclear plant, further north up the coast and hit just as hard as Fukushima. Total safe shutdown. Hundreds of residents ran TO the plant for safety. If nuclear was as intrinsically dangerous as Caldicott, Wasserman, Gundersen etc have told you, that plant and all the rest should be smoking, glowing wreckage. But now it has to prove on paper it can do what it has already done in reality, just to be allowed to supply ultra-low electricity to a deficit-crippled Japan that is burning more coal and gas every year.
Helen Caldicott is not a scientist. There was a clip of her confronted with the facts of radiation exposure showing very few extremely deleterious effects...her response was I can't prove it wrong, i.e., "it's dangerous cause I said so". That's _not_ science. Wake up everyone nuclear is a tool, which when treated with due respect can power us away from fossil fuels.
Also the Documentaries Eyes in Outer Space, Mars and Beyond and this one are on the Walt Disney Treasures DVD Tomorrowland. But so are Man in Space and Man and the Moon. According to the program of Mars and Beyond, there's a cameo appearance of Donald Duck in there. I'll show the people him. But I think Walt Disney should know that the cartoon that's on The Plausible Impossible is Thru The Mirror(it's a Mickey Mouse cartoon and it's on Disney plus. But it's like Alice in Wonderland).
One of the few episodes of the era that did not use of Mel blanc or Eric bauza or Jim backus bob bergen Jeff Bergman voice talent so instead Tabitha st germain famous for the voices of rarity princess Luna and many other characters in hasbro library Andrea libman most cuteness as the voice of fluttershy roll Chan and last Janice kawaye as the famous voice of Mary bell Jenny Wakeman
@ 1:32 -- The preceding sentence is utter crap. Jules Verne was not an engineer, and the Nautilus did not run, as implied, on nuclear power in the original novel. (It DID run on nukes in the Disney movie, but that's not what the narrator was implying). Instead, the Nautilus in the original ran on NaHg batteries, with the sodium coming from the seawater.
Danke, das war ja ein spannender Artikel, zumal der Link dort schon NACH diesem Film hier ist! Aber es ist ja gut so, wenn das hier weite Verbreitung findet. Aber die Anti-Atom-Bewegung begann mit der Nachrüstungsdebatte unter Helmut Schmidt und den Pershing 2-Raketen!
This is very old fashioned and omits all that we know today about why nuclear radiation is safe - as also confirmed by the very small death toll at Chernobyl and the zero toll at Fukushima and other accidents. The film should be remade and brought up to date to include the environment. Then the absolute necessity of nuclear power and its extraordinary safety would be made clear. This is why I will give it "unlike". Academic professor of nuclear physics
Dear Wade. I don't know, where you got Your 'information' about Fukushima, but the radiation-level was and IS that high, that many people are dying already of cancer and other related illnesses! Same in Chernobyl. And not only the firefighters there. Even on the US-westcoast you can messure the radiation in the Pacific-waters. We don't talk about Japan and it's coast. I'm sure YOU would not eat those fish caught there, if you know, where they came from. You believe in UFOs, too?
The deathtoll in Fukushima will show up only in a couple of years, my friend. Cancer grows very slowly! And in Chernobyl there were many dead, first of all the firefighters!
Jörn Napp That is untrue. You can speculate that next year I will be hit on the head by a meteorite. That is speculation not science. Science predicts that it is very unlikely that ANYBODY at all will die from radiation at Fukushima, as I was able to say 4 years ago www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-12860842 so no change. Unfortunately the number of people who have been killed by the fear of radiation is high, over 1000, and the massive damage to the environment by turning safe nuclear power stations off has already occurred.
"cancer grows very slowly" heh, what a way to dismiss lack of extra cancer diagnoses. The dismissive phrase you're looking for is not "cancer grows very slowly!" - because often-times, that's not the case, is it, now? The phrase you're looking for is, an elevated exposure to raidation increases risk of cancer - and if elevated for decades, increases an individual's risk of developing cancer to some considerable (but predictable) extent. You're going to have to look at the type of radiation and its half-life and concentration, and the route for inhalation/ingestion, and what exposure all that translates to, before you can say you "know" there's an increased risk. Oh my, it's almost as-if we have scientists for doing that very thing! Well I never! XD
Ja den Film gibt es auf deutsch. Er wurde mir in der ~10. Klasse als Lehrfilm vorgeführt. Allerdings waren die erst 5min., die Walt Disney als Werbesendung für seinen Vergnügungspark nutzt rausgeschnitten..... Sag bescheid, wenn Du die deutsche Version i'wo findest ;)
Ja den Film gibt es auf deutsch. Er wurde mir in der ~10. Klasse als Lehrfilm vorgeführt - ist aber Ewigkeiten her... da führ man noch mit der Kutsche zur Schule :() . Allerdings waren die erst 5min., die Walt Disney als Werbesendung für seinen Vergnügungspark nutzt, rausgeschnitten..... Sag bescheid, wenn Du die deutsche Version i'wo findest ;)
AFAIK gibt es den Film nicht online auf Deutsch (ich habe zumindest nichts gefunden). Man kann ihn aber ausleihen: (keine URLs.. argh. Also auf medienrecherche.lmz-bw.de nach dem Titel suchen, als Medienzentrum Freiburg auswaehlen, bei mir war es der 2. Treffer...) ...allerdings als 16mm Film... ;-)
Haben wir heute in der Schule gesehen, nicht auf DVD oder VHS, sondern auf Filmrolle. Wir wollen unseren Lehrer überraschen und ihm eine Version auf DVD geben, damit er nicht immer den Projektor für Filmrollen ausleihen muss. Weiß jemand wo es die deutsche Version gibt? Just watched this in school, on a video roll. We want to surprise our teacher by giving him this film on DVD, but we can't find the german version. Does anyone how where to get it?
vermutlich ;-) kann man filme auch von youtube runterladen und dann auf dvd brennen... untertitel könnte man vielleicht dann ebenso noch einsetzen. dafür gibts einige webseiten
Gut gemacht. Typisch Disney. Aber sehr überholt. Viele kluge Leute waren in dieser Zeit enthusiastisch über die erhofften Möglichkeiten der friedlichen Nutzung der Kernkraft. In diesem Fall auch der später im deutschen TV bekannt gewordenen HEINZ HABER!
Der Film ist bewusst "pro Atom" - war so ja auch von der US-Regierung in Auftrag gegeben worden. "Sachlich" bedeutet für mich immer auch neutral und über die Gefahren geht der Film gar nicht ein - weil das im Bewusstsein der 50er noch nicht vorhanden war. Da der Film für Kinder gedacht ist, sind die deutschen "Atom-Sendungen" z.B. der Sendung mit der Maus weit besser wie ich finde - für Kinder.
well, he served for the German Luftwaffe in WWII until 1942, when he was wounded. He returned back to university to do military research. He was brought to the USA after the war to deny the Soviets access to his scientific expertise and knowledge, where he contributed to the development of NASA (source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinz_Haber)
Yes, and unlike Wernher von Braun he was a staunch supporter of the ideology. He was an avid member of various far right parties before 1933 and a member of the NSDAP after 1933. Say what you will about the Nazis, but the Germans have always been on the cutting edge of engineering and technology. Operation Paperclip saved various talented scientists that would’ve otherwise been killed or enslaved by the Soviets. Had it not been for it, we would be 20-30 years behind technologically.
Also ein Atomflugzeug halte ich für fast so verantwortungslos wie das in den 50ern mal ernsthaft disktuierte Atom-Auto. Bei Atom-Flugzeugträgern oder Atom-Ubooten ist die Unfallgefahr lang nicht so hoch wie bei Drohnen, Flugzeugen - oder eben Autos
Question to all the 'friends' of nuclear power: Are you willing, to live right beside a powerplant and later place one waste-container inside your own garden? If not, you are a simple lier!
Absolutely. Nuclear power will be what propels us on deep space voyages. I'd love to go intergalactic, and if that means using a nuclear reactor to propel me and others througj the harsh vacuum of space, sign me up. So of course I'd live next to one.
![Run Away - Tzuyu(TWICE) ツウィ 쯔위 [Music Bank] | KBS WORLD TV 240906](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KnHNNyAYiu0/mqdefault.jpg)
There is a beauty and optimism to the 1950s that we have long since lost...
Nuclear power is where 50s utopianism was right.
Love the atom!
It is still a great video about nuclear power. Despite what has become outdated, it does do a good job of explaining it, and why we should go with nuclear power.
Total propaganda, and your reply shows how well it worked.
Beautiful production, as only the Disney of old could make it.
The Greeks used ground up Lead as a spice for food and drink. Similarly the people of the time this video was produced did not know it was dangerous to cell walls. It is a good tool when used well but not in the medical field.
Still though. What a great historical video. I am glad it was uploaded. Thank you.
It is, in fact, a great tool of modern medicine, and much of what he talks about is still in use today, saving lives.
I thought that myself, until I realised that the giger counter noise can be added in post, and the rock could be any old rock at all, and the giger counter needle could be moved with puppetry. All of those things could be done with the technology of the time... HOWEVER, there were also a proliferation of chemistry sets that includes real uranium and real giger counters, so who knows maybe it WAS real. Radiation sickness was known for about 40-50 years before this was made, however, so I would expect a scientist to know its danger.
Thanks for Posting❗🤓👍
Brilliant science! Nuclear energy is still our long-term future.
Damn right it is. I wish more people would embrace it.
Totally! LFTR, IFR, et al are incredible technology that not only provides more energy per kilo of fissile material but without the needless high level waste of today's antique reactor designs. (lftr = lithium fluoride thorium reactor, ifr = integral fast reactor)
We hope new remake 'Astro Boy(Atom)' Animated films and TV series will be released again by the production of Walt Disney Animation Studio in the future beginning in the 2030s. Astro Boy Series truly look like and fit the Walt Disney Animation.
The Atom is our future!
no mention of Lise Meitner who was cheated of the1944 Nobel prize for discovering induced
fission of Uranium and who first hypothesized a fission chain reaction
Atomflugzeuge? Ich kenne Bilder aus den 50ern wo sogar Atomautos als Zeichnungen zu sehen ist, eine unglaubliche Euphorie. Wie die Genetik heute!
結構前から原子のようなものの存在に気づいた人がいたことに、やっぱ人間すごいなぁと素直に感心した。その反面、どんなものにも危険はあるのかと思った
I remember this documentary and it's educational because it's teaches about science. But I think Walt Disney should know that this person worked on Donald in Mathmagicland and that's a great educational cartoon.
he says "Lord Ernest Rutherford of England" but in fact he was from New Zealand
Born in New Zealand with a British nationality
Heinz just out here handling uranium bare handed
I remember this movie and it's on Disney plus. But this movie came out after Peter Pan and before Lady and the Tramp. For Walt Disney, that means it's between the years of his movies.
Very nice movie
The color version of the intro is available on 16mm educational films provided to Pinellas county FL schools. Hopefully, there are still copies available.
The world is not solid. We only perceive it to be. Molecules and atoms are not solid so how can solidity be made of non solid things. It is vibrations that make things seem solid or not.
Nationalism… optimistic science… and nuclear. All is my favorite
Dieses phantastische Video durften wir Anfang der 60er Jahre auf dem Gymnasium sehen. Nicht nur eine unerschöpfliche Energiequelle für die Zivilisation, sondern auch paradiesische Zustände durch radioaktiven Dünger und radioaktive Futtermittel ! Bösedenker kommentierten: lieber fernsehfaul als radioaktiv ! TIP: Hirn einschalten :-)))
Dr. Heinz, the friendly doctor of Disney and NASA, was a scientist who's work researching high altitude effects on pilots used prisoners at Dachau. What a sweet guy he turned out to be.
Look up Operation Paperclip.
Prof Haber wasn't in Dachau at all. Don't tell lies.
Like many German scientists, they were recruited to the USA.
Neither Eisenhower, nor Churchill nor de Gaulle mentioned gas chambers or holocaust. Eisenhower, who often said he hated Germans and killed more than a few by starvation and exposure after the war. He tells how he visited the camps immediately after the war -- and complains of how cruelly Jews were treated, nothing about systematic killing. Dr. Mengel did not conduct experiments. He was compassionate and German compassion did not fit the propaganda needs of the allies, so they made him a villain So why should I trust you?.
I'm the First) after 10 years...
я даже знаю с какого видоса пришёл)
Сундучата.
Oy ey, russian bois.
Who watched the film in chemistry class at school? :D
Professor Heinz Haber war ein Mannheimer Wissenschaftler!
"Let the atom be a worker, not a soldier"... these words were written on a building in Pripjat, the city next to Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. 50,000 people lived there. Now it's a ghost town.
I believe this documentary came out in the same year as Old Yeller. That's a dramatic movie and it's on Disney plus.
Ja sehr schön... Vor allem die tollen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten wie Atom-Antrieb für Düsenflugzeuge oder noch besser radioaktives Düngemittel.. seeehr schön, mjam mjam.. *ironie*
Busquem conhecimentos constantes, saiam de crenças limitantes.
@smilexshoko nuclear power is actually fairly safe. the number of deaths caused by fossil fuel is a lot greater than the number caused by nuclear power, even with events like those in Fukushima and Chernobyl. honestly, look it up. statistically, fossil fuels are far FAR more dangerous to us both in the long and short term, the deaths just aren't publicised..
Coal also releases far more radioactive material, in the form of carbon 14.
ok, anyone who thinks "Fukushima" is all the reason needed to abandon nuclear energy, listen up.
1) You seriously need to consider your favourite media outlet more critically. Fear and sensationalism sells copy and therefore ad space; even without any radiation deaths or cancers in all this time, every march all we hear about is the anniversary of the meltdowns - never of the ~20000 people killed by the quake and waves, or the destitute or dead evacuees.
2) Learn what becquerels and sieverts are. Then read up on Gôiainia, the Taiwan apartments, the Hiroshima survivors, etc. If nuclear radiation was as exceptionally deadly as you've been brought up to believe, these should be reports of mass death and cancer clusters. The stats say either no long term effect from doses thousands times what is found around Fukushima, or potentially beneficial, hormetic effects.
3) Read up on Onagawa nuclear plant, further north up the coast and hit just as hard as Fukushima. Total safe shutdown. Hundreds of residents ran TO the plant for safety. If nuclear was as intrinsically dangerous as Caldicott, Wasserman, Gundersen etc have told you, that plant and all the rest should be smoking, glowing wreckage. But now it has to prove on paper it can do what it has already done in reality, just to be allowed to supply ultra-low electricity to a deficit-crippled Japan that is burning more coal and gas every year.
Helen Caldicott is not a scientist. There was a clip of her confronted with the facts of radiation exposure showing very few extremely deleterious effects...her response was I can't prove it wrong, i.e., "it's dangerous cause I said so". That's _not_ science. Wake up everyone nuclear is a tool, which when treated with due respect can power us away from fossil fuels.
@@yegfreethinker The "tool" is you.
Caldicott is more like a propagandist. @@yegfreethinker
Also the Documentaries Eyes in Outer Space, Mars and Beyond and this one are on the Walt Disney Treasures DVD Tomorrowland. But so are Man in Space and Man and the Moon. According to the program of Mars and Beyond, there's a cameo appearance of Donald Duck in there. I'll show the people him. But I think Walt Disney should know that the cartoon that's on The Plausible Impossible is Thru The Mirror(it's a Mickey Mouse cartoon and it's on Disney plus. But it's like Alice in Wonderland).
One of the few episodes of the era that did not use of Mel blanc or Eric bauza or Jim backus bob bergen Jeff Bergman voice talent so instead Tabitha st germain famous for the voices of rarity princess Luna and many other characters in hasbro library Andrea libman most cuteness as the voice of fluttershy roll Chan and last Janice kawaye as the famous voice of Mary bell Jenny Wakeman
@ 1:32 -- The preceding sentence is utter crap. Jules Verne was not an engineer, and the Nautilus did not run, as implied, on nuclear power in the original novel. (It DID run on nukes in the Disney movie, but that's not what the narrator was implying). Instead, the Nautilus in the original ran on NaHg batteries, with the sodium coming from the seawater.
Amazing
Brave new world!
Danke, das war ja ein spannender Artikel, zumal der Link dort schon NACH diesem Film hier ist! Aber es ist ja gut so, wenn das hier weite Verbreitung findet. Aber die Anti-Atom-Bewegung begann mit der Nachrüstungsdebatte unter Helmut Schmidt und den Pershing 2-Raketen!
This is very old fashioned and omits all that we know today about why nuclear radiation is safe - as also confirmed by the very small death toll at Chernobyl and the zero toll at Fukushima and other accidents. The film should be remade and brought up to date to include the environment. Then the absolute necessity of nuclear power and its extraordinary safety would be made clear. This is why I will give it "unlike". Academic professor of nuclear physics
Dear Wade.
I don't know, where you got Your 'information' about Fukushima, but the radiation-level was and IS that high, that many people are dying already of cancer and other related illnesses! Same in Chernobyl. And not only the firefighters there. Even on the US-westcoast you can messure the radiation in the Pacific-waters. We don't talk about Japan and it's coast. I'm sure YOU would not eat those fish caught there, if you know, where they came from. You believe in UFOs, too?
Jörn Napp FYI there has been meaningful increase in radiation on our west coast.
The deathtoll in Fukushima will show up only in a couple of years, my friend. Cancer grows very slowly! And in Chernobyl there were many dead, first of all the firefighters!
Jörn Napp That is untrue. You can speculate that next year I will be hit on the head by a meteorite. That is speculation not science. Science predicts that it is very unlikely that ANYBODY at all will die from radiation at Fukushima, as I was able to say 4 years ago www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-12860842 so no change. Unfortunately the number of people who have been killed by the fear of radiation is high, over 1000, and the massive damage to the environment by turning safe nuclear power stations off has already occurred.
"cancer grows very slowly" heh, what a way to dismiss lack of extra cancer diagnoses. The dismissive phrase you're looking for is not "cancer grows very slowly!" - because often-times, that's not the case, is it, now? The phrase you're looking for is, an elevated exposure to raidation increases risk of cancer - and if elevated for decades, increases an individual's risk of developing cancer to some considerable (but predictable) extent. You're going to have to look at the type of radiation and its half-life and concentration, and the route for inhalation/ingestion, and what exposure all that translates to, before you can say you "know" there's an increased risk. Oh my, it's almost as-if we have scientists for doing that very thing! Well I never! XD
Fire, air, water, earth talk about Avatar, The Last Air bender!
Gibt es den Film noch irgendwo auf Deutsch? Ich könnte den für die Schule gebrauchen :P
Ja den Film gibt es auf deutsch.
Er wurde mir in der ~10. Klasse als Lehrfilm vorgeführt.
Allerdings waren die erst 5min., die Walt Disney als Werbesendung für seinen Vergnügungspark nutzt rausgeschnitten..... Sag bescheid, wenn Du die deutsche Version i'wo findest ;)
Great movie :)
Ja den Film gibt es auf deutsch.
Er wurde mir in der ~10. Klasse als Lehrfilm vorgeführt - ist aber Ewigkeiten her... da führ man noch mit der Kutsche zur Schule :() .
Allerdings waren die erst 5min., die Walt Disney als Werbesendung für seinen Vergnügungspark nutzt, rausgeschnitten..... Sag bescheid, wenn Du die deutsche Version i'wo findest ;)
Busquem conhecimento constante. Saiam dos dogmas e de crenças limitantes
AFAIK gibt es den Film nicht online auf Deutsch (ich habe zumindest nichts gefunden).
Man kann ihn aber ausleihen: (keine URLs.. argh. Also auf medienrecherche.lmz-bw.de nach dem Titel suchen, als Medienzentrum Freiburg auswaehlen, bei mir war es der 2. Treffer...)
...allerdings als 16mm Film... ;-)
Ach Walt, musste das sein? -.-
良いというかなんというか……
if walt disney was alive now he would 111
Haben wir heute in der Schule gesehen, nicht auf DVD oder VHS, sondern auf Filmrolle.
Wir wollen unseren Lehrer überraschen und ihm eine Version auf DVD geben, damit er nicht immer den Projektor für Filmrollen ausleihen muss. Weiß jemand wo es die deutsche Version gibt?
Just watched this in school, on a video roll. We want to surprise our teacher by giving him this film on DVD, but we can't find the german version. Does anyone how where to get it?
vermutlich ;-) kann man filme auch von youtube runterladen und dann auf dvd brennen... untertitel könnte man vielleicht dann ebenso noch einsetzen. dafür gibts einige webseiten
ausserdem ist das original doch ungemein lustig... wenn der italiener im Super-Mario-Englisch spricht.... unschlagbar!
Gut gemacht. Typisch Disney. Aber sehr überholt. Viele kluge Leute waren in dieser Zeit enthusiastisch über die erhofften Möglichkeiten der friedlichen Nutzung der Kernkraft. In diesem Fall auch der später im deutschen TV bekannt gewordenen HEINZ HABER!
Ich hab des öfteren noch gesuch, ob ich was brauchbares finde... Gibt aber leider nichts... Entweder ist es schlecht Qualität oder auf Englisch :/
Hasst du den Film zufällig auf deutsch ?:-)
Der Film ist bewusst "pro Atom" - war so ja auch von der US-Regierung in Auftrag gegeben worden. "Sachlich" bedeutet für mich immer auch neutral und über die Gefahren geht der Film gar nicht ein - weil das im Bewusstsein der 50er noch nicht vorhanden war. Da der Film für Kinder gedacht ist, sind die deutschen "Atom-Sendungen" z.B. der Sendung mit der Maus weit besser wie ich finde - für Kinder.
18:56
awesime shot
Samael Aun Weor
Isn't Hanz an ex-SS?
Most likely
well, he served for the German Luftwaffe in WWII until 1942, when he was wounded. He returned back to university to do military research. He was brought to the USA after the war to deny the Soviets access to his scientific expertise and knowledge, where he contributed to the development of NASA (source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinz_Haber)
Yes, and unlike Wernher von Braun he was a staunch supporter of the ideology. He was an avid member of various far right parties before 1933 and a member of the NSDAP after 1933. Say what you will about the Nazis, but the Germans have always been on the cutting edge of engineering and technology. Operation Paperclip saved various talented scientists that would’ve otherwise been killed or enslaved by the Soviets. Had it not been for it, we would be 20-30 years behind technologically.
NaC18 🤔
Also ein Atomflugzeug halte ich für fast so verantwortungslos wie das in den 50ern mal ernsthaft disktuierte Atom-Auto. Bei Atom-Flugzeugträgern oder Atom-Ubooten ist die Unfallgefahr lang nicht so hoch wie bei Drohnen, Flugzeugen - oder eben Autos
Tink is hot!
HEY man can u send me summary of the movie please i have an exam xDD
propaganda bros
Question to all the 'friends' of nuclear power: Are you willing, to live right beside a powerplant and later place one waste-container inside your own garden? If not, you are a simple lier!
Absolutely. Nuclear power will be what propels us on deep space voyages. I'd love to go intergalactic, and if that means using a nuclear reactor to propel me and others througj the harsh vacuum of space, sign me up. So of course I'd live next to one.
Jörn Napp What's a lier?
Adam Olympia lol...give him a break. One or two typos within a comment is okay.
Jörn Napp Nope, then again I wouldn't want to be next to a oil or coal plant either :P
+Jörn Napp Master simple grammar, then we'll believe you're an expert in nuclear technology.
Pathetic !!!!!!
How can a 1950s man be anti coal and oil?