Very interesting. I wondered if the minimax equilibrium and the nash equilibrium could be the same regarding the payments matrix?? if I m not doing a mistake the nash equilibriums are 9,7 (Run Hide) and 9,8 (Fight Hide) which are differents from the minimax eq in this example but theorically do they could be the same? Thanks for your answear :)
![Natanael Cano - Amor Eterno [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EO4prCs6WpM/mqdefault.jpg)
I think the example she said is maxmin instead of minimax....
You are right
Isn't this maximin?
The video is unfortunately incorrect. She explains maxmin not minmax.
This is where the dislike button would've come in handy, had it not been disabled.
@@kautukraj true that. Really hate that decision.
It's really useful, thanks! But sometimes I will get confused between "Maximin" and "Minimax"
Baay'ee Baay'ee gaaridha, nati tolera , thank you so much
Thank you. Now I understand
It is maximin not minimax
Can you make a video explaining Stackelberg games? That'd be really helful, at least to me :)
Very interesting. I wondered if the minimax equilibrium and the nash equilibrium could be the same regarding the payments matrix?? if I m not doing a mistake the nash equilibriums are 9,7 (Run Hide) and 9,8 (Fight Hide) which are differents from the minimax eq in this example but theorically do they could be the same? Thanks for your answear :)
Hi would you cover extended form games please? struggling trying to find the NE of extended form games
wrong explanation