*My 5 Lens Kit for Sony A7III / A7S III / A7C [ E-mount ]* - bit.ly/E-mountLenses *Sony FE 24mm F1.4 GM Long term Review* w/ Sony A7III - bit.ly/SonyFE24mmF14LongTerm
3 года назад+29
It is one of the most versatile lenses. It works perfectly for doing interviews, as a close-up or mid-shot, and is the best macro available from Sony. Thanks for the video. Greetings from Moscow.
The first time I bought my sony A7iii this was the first lens I bought as a wedding photographer. I must say it was my all the way lens from Preparation to church then to the reception.
I bought this lens before I even had a full frame camera and it does not disappoint! I am glad that you noted the bit of focusing noise as my copy was quite loud at first but has since become lees noticeable. It's so sharp , it takes your breath away!
The first of 50 videos about this lens which shows the autofocus speed in the long focal length range. otherwise all of them only ever testify in the macro area. great, thank you very much!
I really appreciate the time you put into this review. I had heard good things about this lens, but made me feel certain about the purchase I just made. Will be using it with the Alpha 1, so can only imagine what the results will be like. Testing in Iceland this month.
I use it on the a7r4 and it brings out the potential & detail of the sensor - both at macro and infinity. Its a very versatile lens - whether for macro - architecture - landscape - fine art compositions. I have a collection of older mf macro lenses and was surprised at how ergonomic this lens is - AF combined with DMF for more macro precision works very well - also on the the r4 one can use it in both crop and ff mode so the versatilty of macro range increases. It is also one of my favorite lenses.
I use this lens in combination with my a7R iv for portraiture and love the results. I haven't used it much for actual macro work (LOL). Your macro images look terrific William! What lighting do you use for macro photos?
This is my 2nd lense. I really love the controls on the lense itself, it's really handy! I really love this lense for virtually everything. I think I made a good choice for my first none-kit lense.
Do you experience any ‘movement’ in the lens? Particularly at close focus in manual? A slight clunk… not always there and disappears when OIS is switched off.
I recently bought the 135mm GM and it was between that lens and the 90mm G. I just didn't shoot macro enough to justify it, but I have a feeling I'll buy it eventually.
I just picked up the 135mm gm and it's an amazing lens. I use it every chance I get for portraits. I pull out my 90mm when I don't have a enough room to use the 135mm. But I never use the 90mm with anyone with fair skin due to it shows everything lol and creates more work in editing.
It would be perfect if you had also put the fetas used in the photos. I can't get the whole object in focus, I need to use an f16... f20 and then you need a lot of iso or a lot of light. In the clip at minute 5:12 there is a watch that can be seen very clearly from the bracelet, what f did you use, or did you do Focus Stacking? A tutorial like this would be nice. thank you.
My 90 mm macro is coming in Tomorrow. It's going on my Sony a7r4. I can't wait 🙂. My current kit is a sony 100mm to 400mm with a 1.5 extender. I have the Tamron 17 to 28mm 2.8 and the 28 to 75mm 2.8.
Sharp even wide open and works great for flowers, bugs and everything close.. I'm personally not the biggest fan of the background highlights in some situations and it's just a little bit on the heavy side (beter on the A6600) but that's forgivable. It's been my workhorse for many years now. For more bokehliciousness I'd throw a faster lens in my bag, too..
It’s a phenomenal lens for doing school portraits. I used it for all of the Pre-K classes in 3 school districts and it is so sharp. But I wouldn’t use it on high school pictures due to it is so sharp it will make more work for you if some of the older students who have acne or fair skin. But it’s the sharpest lens i own. I use it with my a7riv and this combo is a truly awesome system that will always put A smile on your face when you see the image results
@@TheHybridShooter I was worried about the larger files slowing down my editing computer and my 2020 iPad Pro 12.9. And the iPad pro handles these files just as fast as my $2800 computer using lightroom.
@Qflick I have been so happy with Sony since I made the switch in February. $14, 000 later I have the a7r4, a9, 135mm f1.8 GM, sigma 105mm f1.4, 90mm macro, Sony 200-600, Tamron 70-180 f2.8, samyang 85mm and 35mm f1.4 lenses and the the Sony 50mm f1.8. And that's not including the switch to all-new speedlights for Sony and triggers. And I said to myself now I am done buying camera stuff. And I stop buying camera stuff cuz I'm not rich either I just used all my money I make to buy more camera stuff. So I didn't buy nothing except I just got my new iPad Pro 12.9 m1 1tb in the mail today. It is a pretty nice piece of Machinery that downloads and uploads from Lightroom almost twice as fast. Now the wife wants to go on vacation and I'm all tapped out. She's going to kick my ass
I am between this and the 100mm stf gm . I know it actually steps down more because of the engineering of the lens , but still its very versatile for both portraits and macro . I already have the 85mm gm , so maybe the 90mm would be to close to the same. But I don't think you could go wrong with either one.
@@TheHybridShooter macro would be the main reason, I just thought it would make for a nice portrait also, So I think the 90mm would probably be better.
How does the autofocus perform on apsc (a6500)? Is it a viable option for shots with fast shutter speeds, such as sport action or running dogs (outdoors)? I was considering a fast prime telephoto lens for apsc, such as the sony 85 1.8, but if this performs decently, i'd love to get this due to its macro option. Thank you!
i use to have the a6500 with the 90 macro glass. the images came out beautiful. it works fine for sport shooting. but most people would get the 70-200 f4 or 2.8 for action/sport shooting. the 90 macro is an expensive glass. if you really want to shoot macro, i recommend this glass. but if you want to get action/sport images, i recommend the tamron 70-180 2.8. the 85 1.8 is a fantastic portrait lens on the a6500. but its not versatile like a zoom lens for action/sport. that doesnt mean you cant use it for those occasions. it just wont be ideal.
also, i only had a 56mm 1.4 glass for shooting volleyball games. i made it work by moving around the court to get my angles. i was allowed to shoot next to the courts so i was able to get tight shots. some angles i wasnt able to get bc players came to close to me. that's how it is when you shoot with prime glass. if you can afford the zoom glass, go for it.
I'm thinking about getting into taking up close photos of bugs, can someone tell me if this would be a good idea with this lens? Or are there better options?
Great lens that I wish took the teleconverters. Instead I have to lug around a 180mm f2.8 1:1 macro that is bigger and heavier than my 70-200 GM. Wish Sony would become the first to provide a mirrorless designed 150-180mm 1:1 macro lens - it seems that the DSLR designs from third party manufacturers is all that is left (Canon and Nikon have discontinued the lens).
Making teleconverters work with a macro lens would probably be quite difficult. If you need longer telephoto lens, I recommend using this one with an APS-C camera. That will give you 135mm equivalent and higher magnification than with FF camera.
@@TheHybridShooter However, cropping by means of a smaller sensor doesn't solve the increased _working distance advantage_ provided by lenses with a longer focal length.
@@TheHybridShooter Since I use the A7Riv that is an option without having to carry an APSC camera. I just make sure to carry the 90 G and 100-400 GM with me for the times that I don't have the 180 macro but I really like the "look" I get with that lens. :)
The main advantage is optical stabilization which is extremely important on this type of lens. 90mm focal length is also significantly more versatile than 105 IMO.
It is cheaper but it doesn't have image stabilization. And this lens have. And this lens have a way faster autofocus than sigma. This macro lens is definitely worth buying.
I am thinking the same thing about the 100mm f1.4. I have the 85mm f1.4, the 90mm, and the 135mm GM. And I still want the 100mm f1.4 lol. I had the sigma 105mm f1.4 for my Nikon Z6 and never used my 85mm since I bought it. I figured I will get rid of my 85mm if I get the 100mm
This lens is incredible, I only wish Sony had focus bracketing built in to their bodies like other manufacturers do. In 2021 it feels stone age to use a focus slider or manually focus when manufacturers like Fuji has had bracketing for years.
Using ff for macro photography is like using a Harley Davidson on a racetrack. It doesn't make sense. Best combo for macro oly m1mii/miii and 30 f3.5 or better 60 f2.8. Focus bracketing, 10fps with flash, great dof, ibis, hhhrs(m1miii), much better autofocus in low light compared to any system. Everything else just doesn't make sense.
Hello when I put it in manual mode, I zoom perfectly from a distance, but when I shoot the zoom it disappears and the photo is seen from afar, what could it be?
I think @neweditions could be referring to the automatic focus magnifier, which engages when you manually zoom but switches back to normal view when you press the shutter. My A7iii does this too. It's a menu setting, but unfortunately I haven't looked into how it can be changed. A bit of googling should do it.
Contax 120mm macro for their 645 2 1/4 camera was considered IT. Transparencies were almost 3 dimensional. Ah, the golden days... I still don't see any pastry shops.
@@TheHybridShooter The plane of focus is not flat, it is slightly curved, so unfortunately it doesn't make a good lens for taking tack sharp picture of flat objects such as film negatives as the corners will start to fall out of focus
@@TheHybridShooter Scandisk Extreme Pro 64 GB. I do know of an issue with the those cards which was fixed with a firmware update, but my camera is up to date. I have a Sony tough and a Lexar USH II cards and they work fine. UHS I cards give me the “Unable to read memory card; Reinsert memory card”.... message.
I have neve encountered or heard about any of these issues, so it must be unit-specific. Also make sure to format the card in-camera (if possible) before you use it.
@@TheHybridShooter With respect, I disagree. In my tests the 135mm GM lens is sharper (centre to edge) at all comparable apertures - even its f/1.8 is sharper than f/2.8 on the macro. It is also better corrected for chromatic aberrations. Maybe I have a bad copy of the macro lens.
@@BruceMarlier I was comparing my experience of their comparative IQ and sharpness - as for whatever else you were trying to explain, tell me something that I don't already know.
*My 5 Lens Kit for Sony A7III / A7S III / A7C [ E-mount ]*
- bit.ly/E-mountLenses
*Sony FE 24mm F1.4 GM Long term Review* w/ Sony A7III
- bit.ly/SonyFE24mmF14LongTerm
It is one of the most versatile lenses. It works perfectly for doing interviews, as a close-up or mid-shot, and is the best macro available from Sony. Thanks for the video. Greetings from Moscow.
Agreed, it is indeed a very versatile lens.
Always my pleasure!
The first time I bought my sony A7iii this was the first lens I bought as a wedding photographer. I must say it was my all the way lens from Preparation to church then to the reception.
I bought this lens before I even had a full frame camera and it does not disappoint! I am glad that you noted the bit of focusing noise as my copy was quite loud at first but has since become lees noticeable. It's so sharp , it takes your breath away!
So glad I found your review of this lens at first, as I am intending to buy it to shoot wrist watches as well! Great review!
The first of 50 videos about this lens which shows the autofocus speed in the long focal length range. otherwise all of them only ever testify in the macro area. great, thank you very much!
Mine should arrive in a couple of days, can not wait to put my hands on it!!!!😍
I really appreciate the time you put into this review. I had heard good things about this lens, but made me feel certain about the purchase I just made. Will be using it with the Alpha 1, so can only imagine what the results will be like. Testing in Iceland this month.
I use it on the a7r4 and it brings out the potential & detail of the sensor - both at macro and infinity. Its a very versatile lens - whether for macro - architecture - landscape - fine art compositions. I have a collection of older mf macro lenses and was surprised at how ergonomic this lens is - AF combined with DMF for more macro precision works very well - also on the the r4 one can use it in both crop and ff mode so the versatilty of macro range increases. It is also one of my favorite lenses.
Great content as always , thanks for posting .
Thank you!
I use this lens in combination with my a7R iv for portraiture and love the results. I haven't used it much for actual macro work (LOL). Your macro images look terrific William! What lighting do you use for macro photos?
I loved this lens when I had it paired to my a7r3. Perfect combination
I got the a7iii and the macro 90mm and it's a beast. I could not be more happy
This is my 2nd lense. I really love the controls on the lense itself, it's really handy! I really love this lense for virtually everything. I think I made a good choice for my first none-kit lense.
Exactly what I needed! Thank you!
My pleasure, thank you for watching!
i have the same setup and i love it !!! great video :) bye from Italy
my favorite portrait and table top lens in 20 years of professional shooting
This is the sharpest set of images I have ever seen in my entire life lol, I've heard people say it's sharp but this is madness
Do you experience any ‘movement’ in the lens? Particularly at close focus in manual? A slight clunk… not always there and disappears when OIS is switched off.
mine comes tomorrow. yippie!!
Looking forward to the compact primes review. I would appreciate a 40 or 50 with that size but I haven't heard many great things so far...
Unfortunately, I won't be reviewing those anytime soon.
I recently bought the 135mm GM and it was between that lens and the 90mm G. I just didn't shoot macro enough to justify it, but I have a feeling I'll buy it eventually.
I just picked up the 135mm gm and it's an amazing lens. I use it every chance I get for portraits. I pull out my 90mm when I don't have a enough room to use the 135mm. But I never use the 90mm with anyone with fair skin due to it shows everything lol and creates more work in editing.
This is a great review!
Thank you!
Thanks for the great review. For what do you typically use the button on the barrel?
I have set it up for focus magnification. I used to use it for Eye-AF but that is automatic now on latest Sony Cameras.
Awesome review ! I use this lens on a daily basis it’s an amazing investment for any macro shooter.
Thank you!
It would be perfect if you had also put the fetas used in the photos. I can't get the whole object in focus, I need to use an f16... f20 and then you need a lot of iso or a lot of light. In the clip at minute 5:12 there is a watch that can be seen very clearly from the bracelet, what f did you use, or did you do Focus Stacking? A tutorial like this would be nice. thank you.
Nice shot of the Speedmaster! Just got the lens for shooting watches (I am a watch trader)
Thanks for the video
Thank you!
The photo is so beautiful👍👍👍👍
If someone is on the fence as to whether or not they want to buy it. Let me save you some time. Buy it.
It's probably more about whether to buy this or the sigma 105, which is just about as excellent
@@cvbattum if that’s the case, go with Sony if you want the image stabilization and optimal performance with Sony.
I did buy it and it's noisy as #$$%...90mm macro NOT for video!
My 90 mm macro is coming in Tomorrow. It's going on my Sony a7r4. I can't wait 🙂. My current kit is a sony 100mm to 400mm with a 1.5 extender. I have the Tamron 17 to 28mm 2.8 and the 28 to 75mm 2.8.
also one of my favorite lens, though i wish the AF was a tad faster so that its even more versatile
That probably depends more on the camera, it is very fast withA7 III as you can see in the video.
EXCELLENT concise review! Any experience with this lens in combination with Sony's APS-C bodies?
Thank you! Unfortunately not, I have only used it on a full frame.
Sharp even wide open and works great for flowers, bugs and everything close.. I'm personally not the biggest fan of the background highlights in some situations and it's just a little bit on the heavy side (beter on the A6600) but that's forgivable. It's been my workhorse for many years now. For more bokehliciousness I'd throw a faster lens in my bag, too..
Do you suppose this lens would be good for food photography? i.e. let's say I have a dish of pasta... do you think this would be good?
Vďaka za super vysvetlenie 👌🙂
It’s a phenomenal lens for doing school portraits. I used it for all of the Pre-K classes in 3 school districts and it is so sharp. But I wouldn’t use it on high school pictures due to it is so sharp it will make more work for you if some of the older students who have acne or fair skin. But it’s the sharpest lens i own. I use it with my a7riv and this combo is a truly awesome system that will always put A smile on your face when you see the image results
Thank you for sharting your experiences! I am also looking forward to using it with A7R IV-A once it arrives.
@@TheHybridShooter I was worried about the larger files slowing down my editing computer and my 2020 iPad Pro 12.9. And the iPad pro handles these files just as fast as my $2800 computer using lightroom.
@Qflick I have been so happy with Sony since I made the switch in February. $14, 000 later I have the a7r4, a9, 135mm f1.8 GM, sigma 105mm f1.4, 90mm macro, Sony 200-600, Tamron 70-180 f2.8, samyang 85mm and 35mm f1.4 lenses and the the Sony 50mm f1.8. And that's not including the switch to all-new speedlights for Sony and triggers. And I said to myself now I am done buying camera stuff. And I stop buying camera stuff cuz I'm not rich either I just used all my money I make to buy more camera stuff. So I didn't buy nothing except I just got my new iPad Pro 12.9 m1 1tb in the mail today. It is a pretty nice piece of Machinery that downloads and uploads from Lightroom almost twice as fast. Now the wife wants to go on vacation and I'm all tapped out. She's going to kick my ass
So even though its a macro it would work well for normal photography and video use as well and even portraits? Damn.
Nice video as usual.
Thank you! Yes, that is correct.
Thanks!
I am between this and the 100mm stf gm . I know it actually steps down more because of the engineering of the lens , but still its very versatile for both portraits and macro . I already have the 85mm gm , so maybe the 90mm would be to close to the same. But I don't think you could go wrong with either one.
Those are very different types of lenses, so it mainly depends on what do you intend to use it for.
@@TheHybridShooter macro would be the main reason, I just thought it would make for a nice portrait also, So I think the 90mm would probably be better.
@@donniegenton5495 Yes, definitely.
plz Hybrid Shooter, do you know if this amazing lens have some hotspot if we use it for infrared photography ? (with a fullspectrum camera of course!)
Unfortunately, I have no idea.
@@TheHybridShooter thanks :)
How does the autofocus perform on apsc (a6500)? Is it a viable option for shots with fast shutter speeds, such as sport action or running dogs (outdoors)? I was considering a fast prime telephoto lens for apsc, such as the sony 85 1.8, but if this performs decently, i'd love to get this due to its macro option. Thank you!
I have never tested it on APS-C camera, so I don’t know, but see no reason why there should be any issues.
i use to have the a6500 with the 90 macro glass. the images came out beautiful. it works fine for sport shooting. but most people would get the 70-200 f4 or 2.8 for action/sport shooting. the 90 macro is an expensive glass. if you really want to shoot macro, i recommend this glass. but if you want to get action/sport images, i recommend the tamron 70-180 2.8. the 85 1.8 is a fantastic portrait lens on the a6500. but its not versatile like a zoom lens for action/sport. that doesnt mean you cant use it for those occasions. it just wont be ideal.
also, i only had a 56mm 1.4 glass for shooting volleyball games. i made it work by moving around the court to get my angles. i was allowed to shoot next to the courts so i was able to get tight shots. some angles i wasnt able to get bc players came to close to me. that's how it is when you shoot with prime glass. if you can afford the zoom glass, go for it.
Is there any news about new version of macro lens from Sony ?
I'm not aware of any new version.
I'm thinking about getting into taking up close photos of bugs, can someone tell me if this would be a good idea with this lens? Or are there better options?
Yes
@@vaisakhviswam8112 thanks!
90mm works, but look into the Sigma 105mm too, for little critters that extra length may work in your favour
Is the focusing scale supposed to move independently from the focus ring?
When you pull the focusing ring back to manual mode, it will be moving.
@TheHybridShooter It is supposed to move without it being engaged to shoot manual?
Thanks! Probably a stupid question, what do these multi-colored numbers mean? )
Focus distance scale in both centimeters and inches.
How is it due to range vs the 70-200 gm because its also a mid tele lens.
I can't really answer that, 70-200 obviously provides more flexibility, but it is a completely different type of lens.
@@TheHybridShooter true, thanks for the reply though :) subbed.
No problem, I appreciate your subscription!
Never been so early !
Great lens that I wish took the teleconverters. Instead I have to lug around a 180mm f2.8 1:1 macro that is bigger and heavier than my 70-200 GM. Wish Sony would become the first to provide a mirrorless designed 150-180mm 1:1 macro lens - it seems that the DSLR designs from third party manufacturers is all that is left (Canon and Nikon have discontinued the lens).
Making teleconverters work with a macro lens would probably be quite difficult. If you need longer telephoto lens, I recommend using this one with an APS-C camera. That will give you 135mm equivalent and higher magnification than with FF camera.
@@TheHybridShooter However, cropping by means of a smaller sensor doesn't solve the increased _working distance advantage_ provided by lenses with a longer focal length.
Of course it does, the working distance will be the same as when using 135mm lens of full frame.
@@TheHybridShooter Since I use the A7Riv that is an option without having to carry an APSC camera. I just make sure to carry the 90 G and 100-400 GM with me for the times that I don't have the 180 macro but I really like the "look" I get with that lens. :)
Can I use this for jewerly photography on models?
Yes, sure.
I don't even have any Sony gear but watch this anyway. Nobody does gear pr0n better than THS.
Thank you!
It would be nice to see is there an advantage between this lens and the Sigma 105 mm Macro, which is way cheaper than the Sony
The main advantage is optical stabilization which is extremely important on this type of lens. 90mm focal length is also significantly more versatile than 105 IMO.
It is cheaper but it doesn't have image stabilization. And this lens have. And this lens have a way faster autofocus than sigma. This macro lens is definitely worth buying.
Still the best macro lens in 2022. And perhaps 2023 as well.
how is the autofocus in video? any focus noise observed in videos? how does it compare with Nikon 105mm macro Z mount?
Would be good for jewelry too?
Yes.
Is it good for video shooting sir.?
Yes, apart from the focus breathing.
How many meters can it zoom in.? I need the lens to zoom in 100 to 200 meters
@@aitodayz This is not a zoom lens. If you mean focusing, you can focus to infinity.
The review is very good, I think that when you engage the manual focus it is mechanical, not by wire.
Thank you, no, it is definitely focus by wire, you can hear the motor noise when focusing manually.
Also Good for portrait and landscape architecture ? :) Thanks
Yes, I think so (as I have said in the video).
So, I take it you like it? Haha nice review
Can I use it on Sony a6400?
yes
It’s ok to use on my a7c
For sure.
I am having 85 1.8 batis and this 90mm, but why, god, why i am thinking about 105 1.4?!
I am thinking the same thing about the 100mm f1.4. I have the 85mm f1.4, the 90mm, and the 135mm GM. And I still want the 100mm f1.4 lol. I had the sigma 105mm f1.4 for my Nikon Z6 and never used my 85mm since I bought it. I figured I will get rid of my 85mm if I get the 100mm
This lens is incredible, I only wish Sony had focus bracketing built in to their bodies like other manufacturers do. In 2021 it feels stone age to use a focus slider or manually focus when manufacturers like Fuji has had bracketing for years.
Using ff for macro photography is like using a Harley Davidson on a racetrack. It doesn't make sense. Best combo for macro oly m1mii/miii and 30 f3.5 or better 60 f2.8. Focus bracketing, 10fps with flash, great dof, ibis, hhhrs(m1miii), much better autofocus in low light compared to any system. Everything else just doesn't make sense.
Hello when I put it in manual mode, I zoom perfectly from a distance, but when I shoot the zoom it disappears and the photo is seen from afar, what could it be?
This is not a zoom lens, focal length is fixed. You are just magnifying focus point.
@@TheHybridShooter Thank you
So the zoom could only be done in post-production?
Not really, if you want to zoom, you should probably get a zoom lens such as 70-200mm.
I think @neweditions could be referring to the automatic focus magnifier, which engages when you manually zoom but switches back to normal view when you press the shutter. My A7iii does this too.
It's a menu setting, but unfortunately I haven't looked into how it can be changed. A bit of googling should do it.
@@MarcelVolker Yes, I also mentioned that in my original answer.
Contax 120mm macro for their 645 2 1/4 camera was considered IT. Transparencies were almost 3 dimensional. Ah, the golden days...
I still don't see any pastry shops.
Shame the field curvature isn't v flat
What do you mean by that?
@@TheHybridShooter The plane of focus is not flat, it is slightly curved, so unfortunately it doesn't make a good lens for taking tack sharp picture of flat objects such as film negatives as the corners will start to fall out of focus
@@user-rh9zk7zm5f If you mean distortion, the amount is very small and it can be completely fixed by profile correction.
I want it so bad but I m broke
am still waiting for the 70 gm Macro
That might be a very long wait, 70mm is too short for most macro work, so I think that Sony would release 100mm macro first.
That's so sad when we don't see the GH5 MII in The Hybrid Shooter channel. :(
It’s just another repackage, so I am not particularly interested in reviewing it.
Hey, great vid. I’m having issues with my A7iii; slot 1 will only read UHS II cards. Have you ever had or heard of this issue?
No, I have never heard about such issues. Both slots should work with any type of SD cards. What card are you using?
@@TheHybridShooter Scandisk Extreme Pro 64 GB. I do know of an issue with the those cards which was fixed with a firmware update, but my camera is up to date. I have a Sony tough and a Lexar USH II cards and they work fine. UHS I cards give me the “Unable to read memory card; Reinsert memory card”.... message.
If the issue only occurs with one specific SD card, the issue is most likely not with the camera.
@@TheHybridShooter It also occurs with my Lexar, and PNY cards as well. I use the Sandisk as my primary.
I have neve encountered or heard about any of these issues, so it must be unit-specific. Also make sure to format the card in-camera (if possible) before you use it.
It's strange about Sony, cheap-looking (plastic) cameras but first-rate lenses.
I strongly disagree with the first part, that is a thing of distant past.
I couldn't agree more, although - in terms of image quality - the 135mm f/1.8 GM lens might be slightly better.
135mm GM is also fantastic, but not as sharp as 90mm Macro below F4.
@@TheHybridShooter With respect, I disagree. In my tests the 135mm GM lens is sharper (centre to edge) at all comparable apertures - even its f/1.8 is sharper than f/2.8 on the macro. It is also better corrected for chromatic aberrations. Maybe I have a bad copy of the macro lens.
@@BruceMarlier I was comparing my experience of their comparative IQ and sharpness - as for whatever else you were trying to explain, tell me something that I don't already know.
I just can’t justify it when I already have a 85 1.8
Are you using some AI app to read this text?