Some mistakes : in 11th and 12th centuries, Normandy was part of France. The local ruler happened to be the Duke of Normandy, who was also King of England, but his French territories were part of the Kingdom of France, for which he was vassal to the French King. 1st Colonial Empire : territories in India are missing 2nd Colonial Empire : protectorate of Morroco is missing as well as middle eastern colonies (Syria and Lebanon)
Not just Normandy, technically the French part of the "Angevin Empire" was still France. So it's the same. It's just that in those few instances (and many other ones) the King of France's power didn't reach that territory. Which happened a lot in the kingdom of France, as the king had very limited powers, compared to his nobles.
Nice video. You should have shown when the territory is divided between different french rulers and write the name of the nations they fight against. It gives us a better understanding of the reasons why the border changes.
Also, it's West Francia, not just Francia. The Western nobility was romanized, so a French identity quickly developed. But the Eastern two parts of Charlemagne's empire, which his other two sons got, kept their Germanic Franconian identity - and the name. There were West Francia, East Francia and in the middle - Lothringia, named after the third son Lothar.
The house of Bourbon is a subbranch of the house of Capet (which is itself one of the oldest Frankish houses, the Robertians). When Louis XVI was deposed he was renamed "Louis Capet".
Mistakes regarding Francia : forgot to add territorial gains in 536 (Provence and Italy) Rebellion against Chram, Saxon revolt of 555. Land gained in Southern Britany. Spanish Marche wasn’t directly in Frankish Control. Added the whole conquest of Metz(Alémanie) in 502 instead of 496 - 502. Thurungii conquered in 531.
My family name is initially an old Frank one, Durand (formerly Durandal, formerly Thorn Thaël), it relates to a mythical sword used by Roland, a nephew of Charlemagne during a battle against the moors, in Ronceveaux.
What a decadence French brothers, Charlemagne, Louis XIV and Napoleon Bonaparte for you to have Macron today. May God bless France, from a Brazilian who loves your country!
What do you know about Macron, when Bolsonaro's joke of a presidency has led Brazil to its ruin? At least our country's not decadent. Even better, it's more economically stable than most of our european neighbors thanks to Macron's financial acumen.
It’s amazing you even put the changing of color of the flag during Valerie giscard d’estaing presidence. FYI macron restablished the original colors :)
There are a few issues with accuracy and consistency in this video, probably more than I myself notice, but they should be pointed out: -The flag apparently posing as the Merovingian/Carolingian standard is actually an imaginative rendering of the Oriflamme, a flag that was used during the high and late middle ages, and whose existence can only be confidently traced from the 11th century onwards. I don't know of any surviving Carolingian flags, though it doesn't matter so much as standardized, let alone national flags did not exist at this time at all. -During the Merovingians and Carolingians, the state was divided up according to the principles of patrimonium, meaning that the whole state was treated as the personal property of the king that his sons equally divide among each other. This was the cause of many civil wars throughout this age, Francia commonly being divided into 3/4 practically independent states; but there is no trace of it in the video. -In an opposite twist of events, the situation during the Hundred years' war and prior, during the reign of Philippe Augustus, is portrayed as if France was just a spec on the map! Much of France was controlled by the English king and his domestic allies, but these provinces still remained the kingdom of France. The English king was looking to crown himself with the French crown, not go bring the English crown to France.
The map is far to small in scale. Non French bits like Newhaven (aka Havre), Ponthieu, and English Flanders (Calais, Graveling and so forth), even Ham in Picardy was once upon a time not French. Also all that territory annexed of little old Monaco needs to shown blown up. Furthermore, Papal Avignon was seriously way bigger than that little white speck shown. To be honest, one could write 10 volume book on the territorial history of what is nowadays France. One gets the feeling that the deep state/Satanists don’t won’t folk knowing how much land has been annexed into France and suchlike.
“dizzy” is the nickname of Disraeli and “Poète de Satan” is one of the names of Victor Hugo. Dizzy was an open Jew whilst saint Victor Hugo the Freemasonic/Priory of Sion grandmaster was a crypto Jew.
Normandy and later the french part of what we call now the "Angevin empire" were still inside the kingdom of France, the borders didn't change, only the actual reach (in practice) of the power of the king of France (which btw happened a lot, not just in those two intances). Maybe a light blue color would have been better than removing those territories entirely.
Si c'est ce qui te constitue et te convient mais on devrait parler de Gallia et non de france sauf à partir du milieu du 17 siècle avant le nom france n'existe pas. En gros la France a moins de 300 ans.
@@Bubulles1977 Donc François 1er qui avait régné au 16 ème siècle n'était pas roi de France ! C'est François 1er qui par l'ordonnance de Villers-Cotteret avait remplacé le Latin par le Français comme langue officielle du Royaume de France donc ne dis pas n'importe quoi !
Franks were successor of Rome, they fought for Rome, under roman authority. after the battle of catalonic field, frank earned the military authority over FRANCI (that's how Frankish states was born). From Rhein river to Reims city (actual France). That's the first Francia. The conquest of actual Germany was done after that, under roman authority.
@@leoleboss9414 Salian Franks, who basically further developed into the Flemish, Dutch; but also got assimilated by the majority Gallo-Roman population in Wallonia and Northern France (particularly where the Langues d'oïl are spoken - in some of those regions the Salian Franks were still a slight majority; especially the region Francique, which includes Wallonia, Picardy, Normandy, Champagne and Lorraine). These Franks were allowed by the Romans to settle on the left bank of the Rhine (so mostly in the southern Netherlands, Flanders, Wallonia and parts of northern France). They rose to prominent positions within the empire. Eventually they would conquer most of Western Europe, mostly after the invasions of other Germanic tribes. The Ripuarian Franks didn't settle on imperial lands. They lived mostly in central Germany and parts of eastern France. They further developed into the Franconians and spoke a form of Old High German (High German being the current standard German language) that evolved into the Franconian dialect. Clovis, who conquered most of Gaul, was a Salian Frank. The Carolingians were originally also Salian Franks, but the mother of Charlemagne was Ripuarian and since him the Carolingian dynasty and Frankish nobility favoured the use of Old High German over Frankish/Old Low Franconian/Old Dutch.
@@gringologie9302 The first Fanks to have lived in the Roman Empire were centered not arround Eastern France, but around the cities of Cambrai and Tournai, which are in modern day Northern France and Wallonia. The Frankish heartland has always consisted of parts of both Gaul and Germania (or, if you please, parts of modern day France, Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany; especially the Ripuarian Franks, who, unlike the Salians, didn't settle on the left banks of the Rhine under Roman authority). The Frankish conquest of other German regions did not happen under Roman authority. I don't know where you read that.
We speak of West Francia as long as there were Frankish rulers. We speak of France when the first French dynasty (house of Capet) comes to power, which is in the 10th century and not the 12th century. Just like how we also use Byzantium to refer to the ERE when the empire became more Greek.
Actually the first french dynasty was the Merovingiens , at that time France was a people, not a state. But certainly it has nothing in common with the "French" entity we see today of course.
The House of Capet was Frankish, even though talking of a Frankish doesn’t mean anything at that point since they all mingled with the local gallo-roman. Their title when Hughes Capet ascended the throne was Rex Francorum, latin for King of the Franks, and was an official title up until the Revolution. The term France and Francia is actually the same, because Francia means France in Latin. The term Rex Franciae, which means King of France/Francia was commonly used starting from Philippe II, when the royal authority meant to assert its claim over a certain defined territory instead of a loose Frankish identity. It is also during that time when ancient French language came more and more prevalent in the court administration instead of Latin, hence the use of France. The distinction between France and Francia is made by historians in order to differentiate the Merovingian and Carolingian period with the rest of French History. Also the same way the term Byzantine Empire was historically never used to qualify the eastern part of the Roman Empire, at least not 300 years after the fall of Constantinople. The Hellenic identity of the eastern part of the Empire has always been the case since these lands were conquered by the Republic. Saying that the Eastern Roman Empire was called Byzantine Empire because it was becoming more Greek is just wrong.
@@Kingleazard Merovingians were Frankish. France - as a state, nation or even concept - didn't exist yet, as I already mentioned. The French as a people (nation) didn't even exist yet, but were formed during these period (8th century). Franks were a Germanic people (the French a Romance people). There were Salian and Ripuarian Franks. The Salians were allowed to settle in the WRE, on the left bank of the Rhine by the Roman empire and settled mostly in northern France - where the langues d'oïl, like French, are spoken - Wallonia, Flanders and the Southern Netherlands and can be considered the ancestors of modern Flemish and Dutch people. Their language Old Frankish or Old Low Franconian is also known as Old Dutch (that's not a coincidence). Clovis, a Merovingian, was a Salian Frank. So was Charlemagne, at least partially, his mother was Ripuarian. Ripuarian Franks didn't settle in Gaul until after the fall of the WRE. They can be considered the ancestors of certain German - not Germanic peoples - peoples (namely Franconians). Old French came to exist around the region of Paris and would soon spread across most of modern day France (due to the nobility speaking it or due to it being enforced) during the next centuries. French people are basically Gallo-Romans (Gauls who absorbed a minority of Romans and along with them most of their culture and language), who absorbed a minority of Frankish peoples who settled in that region, along with parts of their culture and language. Do note that the border in the 8th century (majority Germanic - majority Romance) used to be more to the south than it is today; most of that is due to French conquest and the popularity of French amongst the nobility after the 10th century. Do not conflate the "Franks"/"Francs" with the French/français. The French were named after them (do note that "Frank" was used for Western Europeans in general in Greece and the Middle East during the medieval period). The Germans that came from them as well (Franconian); the Dutch/Flemish dropped the name. The Merovingians can be dated back to the 5th century (Childeric I) and the Salian Franks further. The oldest accounts we have of Old French date back to the 8th century (langues d'oïl were some of the first Romance languages to differentiate from Vulgar Latin - the form of Latin that was used for daily conversation - due to the extra influence they experienced from the Frankish language). So even chronologically that wouldn't be possible. It is of course true that Gallo-Romans, and later the first French people, were the majority population in (most parts of) Gaul.
@@nonamelenina1046 You are conflating the Franks with the French. Many used the title of "Franks"; including modern day Franconians (a group of Germans) to refer to themselves. In Byzantium and the Middle East "Franks" were used to refer, not to France, but to the people of Western Europe as a whole. "because Francia means France in Latin" No, Francia is an actual English word. Even the French language distinguishes France from Francia (France - Francie). "The distinction between France and Francia is made by historians in order to differentiate the Merovingian and Carolingian period with the rest of French History." So why do historians still refer to "Francia" as "Francia" during the Carolingian period. The Carolingians were Franks and spoke a Germanic language. It indeed exists to differentiate, just like Byzantium, as I mentioned. But not the Merovingian period from the Carolingian period. Namely, as the name implies, the Frankish period from the French period. It's really that simple. "when ancient French language came more and more prevalent in the court administration instead of Latin" Oh, god, there's so much wrong here. First off, the French language isn't ancient. Old French is medieval (8th century). Secondly, it didn't replace Latin among the nobility. The Frankish nobility spoke Old Frankish, unless it was in a religious context (but so did the French). "Also the same way the term Byzantine Empire was historically never used to qualify the eastern part of the Roman Empire, at least not 300 years after the fall of Constantinople." Correct, your point being? "The Hellenic identity of the eastern part of the Empire has always been the case since these lands were conquered by the Republic." There's no relation here? The Hellenic identity has always been the case because the Romans accepted Hellenic culture (in fact, they accepted many different cultures; often they never even actively tried to Romanise the regions they conquered). "Saying that the Eastern Roman Empire was called Byzantine Empire because it was becoming more Greek is just wrong." Yes it is wrong, but I didn't say that. I never said it "was" (at least not until the 17th century) called that way. I said we do it today for that particular reason. That being said; it's not because Philippe II decided to claim the Frankish identity, like the Byzantine Greeks, like the Germans of the HRE, like the Turkish of Rûm, like how even Russia claimed to be "Romans" or their legitimate successors that they actually were Franks/Romans. I implore you to do a little research on who the Franks actually were, their language, as well as the (Old) French language. And perhaps maybe also do a little research on the ethnogenesis of the French people. Also, the house of Capet was French, not Frankish (quote me a single source that makes that outrageous claim). Franks were a Germanic people and have always been so (also quote me a single source that contradicts that statement). Also, does this sound like French or an early form of French to you? www.language-museum.com/encyclopedia/f/frankish.php Or here for phonetics: ruclips.net/video/jefaToEtXH4/видео.html Here's a little more information about the Frankish language: ruclips.net/video/hMrLt4iqOHk/видео.html www.britannica.com/topic/Frankish-dialect Wikipedia has pages about it (and Old French and Vulgar Latin) too, if you prefer that. I suppose you're probably French. So, bonne journée!
@@ewoudalliet1734 There are may things in your answer that tries to make me say things that I didn't say. Franks does not equate to French people, this is a fact yes, but the mingling of the Frankish people with the gallo-romans gave birth to the French people. That's what I said. During the High medieval ages, there was a distinction between the Franks and the Gallo-Roman population in Gaul, which became more blurry by the end of the Carolingian period. The title of King of the Franks was indeed used by the French monarchy, it doesn't that I personally consider the Franks as French. I don't know where you got the idea that I'm conflating Franks with French people. The Franks in Gaul were just a minority and formed in large part the nobility, that's why I said the House of Capet is frankish. Maybe you will disagree and call me ignorant or whatever. Instead of reading me, who is not a historian, maybe I would suggest you to read these two articles: 'The Origins of the French Nobility: A Reassessment' by Bouchard and 'Nobility and Family in Medieval France: A Review Essay' by Bisson who go far more in depth than whoever might write on RUclips can go. It's not because Francia and Francie are actual words in English and French that my point is wrong. Francia in latin does mean France. Here again you can read, if you haven't read it, 'The "Regnum Francie" of Suger of Saint-Denis: An Expansive Ile-de-France' by Jeremy duQuesnay Adams, where the author explains the relation between France, Francia and the royal domain. On language I used the term 'ancient French' as in Old French yeah, it doesn't look like modern French. The gallic populace spoke vulgar latin which evolved into the different languages that the people in France spoke, including the langue'Oïl. The Frankish nobility spoke Old Frankish indeed, but they did switched to latin and Old French at some point. And I think there's nothing to add on the Eastern Roman Empire since it seems we both agree on that matter :)
França assim como a maioria dos paises europeus são pequenos em territorios mais o povo soube prospera e fazer do pequeno territorio uma grande nação imagina a França com o tamanho do Brasil Índia ou Argentina
from around 1150 where we see a large part of the territory lost, in particular Aquitaine, it is not really true, it certainly belonged to the Plantagenêts but they were not king of these territories in France but Duke (duke of Aquitaine...). is to say that these territories were still part of the kingdom of France and the Plantagenet kings had to pay tribute to the kings of France as duke of his territories in France. Besides, it posed problems because the lords of Aquitaine did not know if they should join their duke (Plantagenêt) or their king (king of France) in the event of war between the French king and the English king.
2:47-3:08 : Mistakes: Should be fix from *King of Francia* to *Emperor of Francia* . At the Treaty of Verdun of 843, Charles the Bald restored the title *King of Francia*
Nope "emperor of Francia" never existed as a title. It was Rex Francorum and Western Roman Emperor or "Roman Emperor". Historians talk only about the "Carolingian Empire"
@@thibaultletricheur1884 At 800, Charlemagne was proclaimed as "Emperor" by Pope Leo, as effort for moving the Roman Empire from the East to the West. Pope Leo was the Roman Catholic Church pope and leader of the Papal States. He knowns for helping Charlemagne which proclaimed as "Emperor", in effort to move the Roman Empire from the East to the West.
There are a lot of mistakes in your video that are being addressed in the comments, but showing the Merovingian Frankish kingdoms as a single kingdom under the King of Paris/Neustria is your biggest mistake in my opinion.
@@mochiyume7537 The Romans simply renaming the town after the name of the Parisii. Thus was then renamed Lutèce, Civitas Parisiorum or "city of Parisii". It was not until the end of the 5th century AD, due to the rise of the Gallic city under the reign of Clovis, that Paris became the capital of the kingdom of the Franks. Sorry but what you say is wrong.
@@mochiyume7537 Franks originated from between what is known today the Netherlands and northwestern Germany, not today’s Franconia. I don’t know why you’re talking about Charlemagne’s empire when I was talking about the Merovingian dynasty. And it’s Francia, not Franchise. And the capital of the empire was Aix-la-Chapelle, or Aachen, in today’s Rhineland and not in Franconia. And Paris existed for centuries as Lutetia or Civitas Parisiorum during the Roman era.
i am not sure where you got the fact that the franks held territory so far away. The Carolingian state only expanded into the east francian area, not past the Elbe.
Francia: *invade America* Reino Unido: NO Francia: *Invade Europa* Reino Unido: NO Francia: *Invade Africa* Reino Unido: NO Reino Unido y Francia: amigos 🤝
Djibouti 🇩🇯 gained independance in 1977 not in 1962. It is the last French 🇨🇵 territory on the African continent (except the Scattered Islands, Mayotte, and Reunion)
@@comisalessandro There has been a French military base in Djibouti since 1977. An American base also since 2002, an Italian military base, a Japanese one and a Chinese base since 2017. which brings a lot of money to Djibouti.
Why Brittany inclused in 942 ? its only in 1532 brittany was attached to french kingdom. In 987; Brittany had not participated to election of Hugues Capet.
Petite erreur sur la carte : l'Île Maurice a été remise à la Grande-Bretagne, mais le territoire de l'île de la Réunion reste à ce jour un territoire français. Small error on the map: Mauritius was handed over to Great Britain, but the territory of Reunion Island remains to this day a French territory.
@@Lyendith no its not the old version. The old version does not have the same lyrics as this song. Anyway it doesn't matter the video is very good and its the only little negative point. I only found this error since I'm french
@@shylver8 Des erreurs, il y en a un paquet : les frontières de la France qui restent inchangées après Clovis alors que son royaume est partagé entre ses fils. Ou la Syrie et le Liban, protectorats français qui n'apparaissent pas... D'autres ont déclaré avoir du d'autres erreurs auxquelles je n'ai pas prêté attention.
@@КнязьМышкин-и9р il a conquit la plupart de l'Europe, a vassalisé la Prusse et l'Autriche, a soumit la Russie et la obligé à être son allié et enfin il a détruit des amées avec ses subordonnés alors qu'elles pouvaient être trois fois plus nombreuses en étant à la tête d'une armée qui été souvant défavorisé comme par exemple la campagne de France de 1814.
Precision, Napoléon Ier and III, also King Louis XVI after 1790 and Kings Louis XVIII, Charles X and Louis Philippe I arent at the head of France but French, which is significantly different.
Most people in modern day France could in theory all be descended from the Capetians with how long ago they were formed but it would be impressive to be able to trace back your lineage all the way back to then
@@sirruadhri3316 yeah what’s cool though is on my moms side her mom traced back to the caroligegin dynasty and her dad traced back to the Capetian dynasty so they are traced back to relatives but from 2 diff family members
The very last présidents of on this list doesnt deserve to appear. They are a shame to french history. Gave our country to arabs and financials without even a fight. Just for their narrow interests. Et surtout, surtout, vive la France ! Nice choice of set of musics by the way.
Up next: The Territorial expansion of Russia
Sorry I took so long, as you can see it goes back even farther than England or Spain
Hallo
Doubles in size in 20 years
Doesn't expand for three centuries
Based
Tha Franks werent frenchs they were germans.
@@santiagoale1377 wtf why r u saying that's obviously wrong
yea i can see but about king before clovais 1 like coldian sorry for bad spelling
11:12 Napoleón joined the chat
11:20 Napoleón He was banned for speed hack
xDD
*Napoleon joined the server
Napoléon*
Some mistakes : in 11th and 12th centuries, Normandy was part of France. The local ruler happened to be the Duke of Normandy, who was also King of England, but his French territories were part of the Kingdom of France, for which he was vassal to the French King.
1st Colonial Empire : territories in India are missing
2nd Colonial Empire : protectorate of Morroco is missing as well as middle eastern colonies (Syria and Lebanon)
he also didn't remove alsace lorraine from france when germany got it from 1871-1918
and Cameroon
Not just Normandy, technically the French part of the "Angevin Empire" was still France. So it's the same.
It's just that in those few instances (and many other ones) the King of France's power didn't reach that territory. Which happened a lot in the kingdom of France, as the king had very limited powers, compared to his nobles.
Also in 2020 France's flag become "dark" again
This probably took weeks to make and loads of research and effort so i’m not very mad at some minor mistakes.
Nice video. You should have shown when the territory is divided between different french rulers and write the name of the nations they fight against. It gives us a better understanding of the reasons why the border changes.
Yes!
@@france1259 france
Also, it's West Francia, not just Francia. The Western nobility was romanized, so a French identity quickly developed. But the Eastern two parts of Charlemagne's empire, which his other two sons got, kept their Germanic Franconian identity - and the name. There were West Francia, East Francia and in the middle - Lothringia, named after the third son Lothar.
Oui
We fight england
Hugh Capet had no idea that his dynasty would last over 800 years
Good man Hugh
C est Hugues
@@darch4534 Hugues*
Technically even now his dynasty still reigns too, just in Spain instead.
@@zefyrisd69 and Luxemburg
Britannia for almost 300 years: "Breath quietly so the gigant won't spot us"
*How many kings named Louis do you want?*
*France:* *Yes*
The house of Bourbon is a subbranch of the house of Capet (which is itself one of the oldest Frankish houses, the Robertians). When Louis XVI was deposed he was renamed "Louis Capet".
Pareil pour celle des Valois
Yes, Citizen Louis Capet
@@Baba.Yaga95 oui les Valois et les Bourbons descendent tous les 2 de Robert le fort.
Les républicains ne sont rien que pour ça dès enflures !!! Oser baffouer le nom de leur souverain !!!
Mistakes regarding Francia : forgot to add territorial gains in 536 (Provence and Italy) Rebellion against Chram, Saxon revolt of 555. Land gained in Southern Britany. Spanish Marche wasn’t directly in Frankish Control. Added the whole conquest of Metz(Alémanie) in 502 instead of 496 - 502. Thurungii conquered in 531.
Altough its a good video, no hate in my comment I suggest you search into obscure topic of history.
How do you know such precise obscure events ?
My family name is initially an old Frank one, Durand (formerly Durandal, formerly Thorn Thaël), it relates to a mythical sword used by Roland, a nephew of Charlemagne during a battle against the moors, in Ronceveaux.
That's very interesting to have such an ancient surname going back to the time of Charlemagne
epic
@@sirruadhri3316 and it's a quite common family name across France and Wallonia
The battle of Ronceveaux was against the Basques. Didn't know for the Durand part tho, that's à cool origin
Charlemagne?
You mean Karl don't you??
What a decadence French brothers, Charlemagne, Louis XIV and Napoleon Bonaparte for you to have Macron today. May God bless France, from a Brazilian who loves your country!
Can it be called a decadence when we had Hollande before Macron though.
What do you know about Macron, when Bolsonaro's joke of a presidency has led Brazil to its ruin? At least our country's not decadent. Even better, it's more economically stable than most of our european neighbors thanks to Macron's financial acumen.
@@professionalprocrastinator8103 Si, notre pays est en décadence depuis 40 ans et Macron est l'un des pires. C'est un socialiste.
Nothing is more decadent than having a gay president or chancellor. All of Europe is in full decline.
you're right it's not like your president bolsonaro, Macron dishonors France from morning to night
It’s amazing you even put the changing of color of the flag during Valerie giscard d’estaing presidence. FYI macron restablished the original colors :)
He announced the changing of the colours after I uploaded the video though :/
Impeccable, super video avec musique inclut. Beau travail,merci beaucoup ce magnifique 👍
Merci beaucoup pour regarder!!
There are a few issues with accuracy and consistency in this video, probably more than I myself notice, but they should be pointed out:
-The flag apparently posing as the Merovingian/Carolingian standard is actually an imaginative rendering of the Oriflamme, a flag that was used during the high and late middle ages, and whose existence can only be confidently traced from the 11th century onwards. I don't know of any surviving Carolingian flags, though it doesn't matter so much as standardized, let alone national flags did not exist at this time at all.
-During the Merovingians and Carolingians, the state was divided up according to the principles of patrimonium, meaning that the whole state was treated as the personal property of the king that his sons equally divide among each other. This was the cause of many civil wars throughout this age, Francia commonly being divided into 3/4 practically independent states; but there is no trace of it in the video.
-In an opposite twist of events, the situation during the Hundred years' war and prior, during the reign of Philippe Augustus, is portrayed as if France was just a spec on the map! Much of France was controlled by the English king and his domestic allies, but these provinces still remained the kingdom of France. The English king was looking to crown himself with the French crown, not go bring the English crown to France.
The map is far to small in scale. Non French bits like Newhaven (aka Havre), Ponthieu, and English Flanders (Calais, Graveling and so forth), even Ham in Picardy was once upon a time not French. Also all that territory annexed of little old Monaco needs to shown blown up. Furthermore, Papal Avignon was seriously way bigger than that little white speck shown. To be honest, one could write 10 volume book on the territorial history of what is nowadays France. One gets the feeling that the deep state/Satanists don’t won’t folk knowing how much land has been annexed into France and suchlike.
I could legit see the expansion of the Angevin Empire in 1160 and the territorial expansion of the French invasion of the Toulouse! Nice work.
Exactly 100 years after the French vassal conquered England. Coincidence?
France: Father did i did great?
Rome: Yes you did great my son.
The french arent descended from the romans
@@Mauri7782 but they we're part of rome and they spoke romance
@@shareem1779 yes frence spoke latin
@@ronaldmaggay2100 latin based language not latin itself
@@shareem1779 almost the whole europe.and north africa was ruled by rome but it doesnt mean they are romans
Crazy to think that the foundation of france dates back to the end of the roman empire. Its just something amazing to think of
That’s what they teach you in French elementary schools! Very difficult to fight against…
"Anyone who looks at the history of France is dizzy" - Victor Hugo
"Anyone who looks at the history of France is dizzy" - Victor Hugo
“dizzy” is the nickname of Disraeli and “Poète de Satan” is one of the names of Victor Hugo. Dizzy was an open Jew whilst saint Victor Hugo the Freemasonic/Priory of Sion grandmaster was a crypto Jew.
Best kingdom, best history in a world. Longue vie au roi!!!
Vive la France ! Vive le Roi !⚜⚜⚜❤❤❤
Britain or Russia has the best history
@@emnsky8 Britain have not history , the first dynasti of britain kings was French
@@Agamemnon- britain have not history?)😂😂
@@emnsky8 Britain 💩
I didn't realise France had so few colonies. Vive la France.
It lacks a few in the video
Few? Just the second largest after England 🙄
Vive la France 🇫🇷 ❤️
@@rvn-manu111 oui
@@hegoney5841 third* after england and Spain
Awesome video, small mistake though: France lost Alsace-Lorraine from 1871-1918 to Germany, it isn't shown on the map though
not alsace lorraine ..alsace Moselle 😉
Normandy and later the french part of what we call now the "Angevin empire" were still inside the kingdom of France, the borders didn't change, only the actual reach (in practice) of the power of the king of France (which btw happened a lot, not just in those two intances).
Maybe a light blue color would have been better than removing those territories entirely.
LONG LIVE NORMANDY 🇬🇬🇯🇪❤️🔥🇫🇷✝️👑
Guillaume wasn't the king of the french
@@billclinton915 Of course he wasn't yes. What does it have to do with what I said though ?
@@billclinton915 mais il était vassal du roi de France.
@@pascalladalle9018 jsp
Honestly bro this is a very good video. Me being a history worm 9/10 👍
I'm the same myself as you can see, I'm glad you enjoyed it
Me for the first 3 minutes of the video: *where charlemagne*
I was doing the same thing lol
It's 3 AM and idk why I watch this. Nice video.
Quelle grande histoire que celle de la France !! Comment ne pas en être fier !!
Je suis un américain et J'aime la France! J'étudie le français avec Duolingo.
Facile, être un gauchiste.
@@idhem5718 bahahha
Si c'est ce qui te constitue et te convient mais on devrait parler de Gallia et non de france sauf à partir du milieu du 17 siècle avant le nom france n'existe pas. En gros la France a moins de 300 ans.
@@Bubulles1977 Donc François 1er qui avait régné au 16 ème siècle n'était pas roi de France ! C'est François 1er qui par l'ordonnance de Villers-Cotteret avait remplacé le Latin par le Français comme langue officielle du Royaume de France donc ne dis pas n'importe quoi !
Funny how both modern day France and Germany used to be one individual kingdom and all under the guys who kept invading the Roman Empire for centuries
The Franks were allied to the Romans , they did not fought the Roman empire . They only fought other Germanic tribes and the kingdom of Syagrius .
Franks were successor of Rome, they fought for Rome, under roman authority. after the battle of catalonic field, frank earned the military authority over FRANCI (that's how Frankish states was born). From Rhein river to Reims city (actual France). That's the first Francia.
The conquest of actual Germany was done after that, under roman authority.
@@leoleboss9414 Salian Franks, who basically further developed into the Flemish, Dutch; but also got assimilated by the majority Gallo-Roman population in Wallonia and Northern France (particularly where the Langues d'oïl are spoken - in some of those regions the Salian Franks were still a slight majority; especially the region Francique, which includes Wallonia, Picardy, Normandy, Champagne and Lorraine). These Franks were allowed by the Romans to settle on the left bank of the Rhine (so mostly in the southern Netherlands, Flanders, Wallonia and parts of northern France). They rose to prominent positions within the empire. Eventually they would conquer most of Western Europe, mostly after the invasions of other Germanic tribes.
The Ripuarian Franks didn't settle on imperial lands. They lived mostly in central Germany and parts of eastern France. They further developed into the Franconians and spoke a form of Old High German (High German being the current standard German language) that evolved into the Franconian dialect.
Clovis, who conquered most of Gaul, was a Salian Frank. The Carolingians were originally also Salian Franks, but the mother of Charlemagne was Ripuarian and since him the Carolingian dynasty and Frankish nobility favoured the use of Old High German over Frankish/Old Low Franconian/Old Dutch.
@@gringologie9302 The first Fanks to have lived in the Roman Empire were centered not arround Eastern France, but around the cities of Cambrai and Tournai, which are in modern day Northern France and Wallonia.
The Frankish heartland has always consisted of parts of both Gaul and Germania (or, if you please, parts of modern day France, Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany; especially the Ripuarian Franks, who, unlike the Salians, didn't settle on the left banks of the Rhine under Roman authority).
The Frankish conquest of other German regions did not happen under Roman authority. I don't know where you read that.
There's something really funny about seeing Napoleon vanish and reappear and finally vanishing for continuity
We speak of West Francia as long as there were Frankish rulers. We speak of France when the first French dynasty (house of Capet) comes to power, which is in the 10th century and not the 12th century. Just like how we also use Byzantium to refer to the ERE when the empire became more Greek.
Actually the first french dynasty was the Merovingiens , at that time France was a people, not a state. But certainly it has nothing in common with the "French" entity we see today of course.
The House of Capet was Frankish, even though talking of a Frankish doesn’t mean anything at that point since they all mingled with the local gallo-roman. Their title when Hughes Capet ascended the throne was Rex Francorum, latin for King of the Franks, and was an official title up until the Revolution. The term France and Francia is actually the same, because Francia means France in Latin. The term Rex Franciae, which means King of France/Francia was commonly used starting from Philippe II, when the royal authority meant to assert its claim over a certain defined territory instead of a loose Frankish identity. It is also during that time when ancient French language came more and more prevalent in the court administration instead of Latin, hence the use of France. The distinction between France and Francia is made by historians in order to differentiate the Merovingian and Carolingian period with the rest of French History.
Also the same way the term Byzantine Empire was historically never used to qualify the eastern part of the Roman Empire, at least not 300 years after the fall of Constantinople. The Hellenic identity of the eastern part of the Empire has always been the case since these lands were conquered by the Republic. Saying that the Eastern Roman Empire was called Byzantine Empire because it was becoming more Greek is just wrong.
@@Kingleazard Merovingians were Frankish. France - as a state, nation or even concept - didn't exist yet, as I already mentioned. The French as a people (nation) didn't even exist yet, but were formed during these period (8th century).
Franks were a Germanic people (the French a Romance people). There were Salian and Ripuarian Franks. The Salians were allowed to settle in the WRE, on the left bank of the Rhine by the Roman empire and settled mostly in northern France - where the langues d'oïl, like French, are spoken - Wallonia, Flanders and the Southern Netherlands and can be considered the ancestors of modern Flemish and Dutch people. Their language Old Frankish or Old Low Franconian is also known as Old Dutch (that's not a coincidence). Clovis, a Merovingian, was a Salian Frank. So was Charlemagne, at least partially, his mother was Ripuarian. Ripuarian Franks didn't settle in Gaul until after the fall of the WRE. They can be considered the ancestors of certain German - not Germanic peoples - peoples (namely Franconians).
Old French came to exist around the region of Paris and would soon spread across most of modern day France (due to the nobility speaking it or due to it being enforced) during the next centuries. French people are basically Gallo-Romans (Gauls who absorbed a minority of Romans and along with them most of their culture and language), who absorbed a minority of Frankish peoples who settled in that region, along with parts of their culture and language. Do note that the border in the 8th century (majority Germanic - majority Romance) used to be more to the south than it is today; most of that is due to French conquest and the popularity of French amongst the nobility after the 10th century.
Do not conflate the "Franks"/"Francs" with the French/français. The French were named after them (do note that "Frank" was used for Western Europeans in general in Greece and the Middle East during the medieval period). The Germans that came from them as well (Franconian); the Dutch/Flemish dropped the name. The Merovingians can be dated back to the 5th century (Childeric I) and the Salian Franks further. The oldest accounts we have of Old French date back to the 8th century (langues d'oïl were some of the first Romance languages to differentiate from Vulgar Latin - the form of Latin that was used for daily conversation - due to the extra influence they experienced from the Frankish language). So even chronologically that wouldn't be possible.
It is of course true that Gallo-Romans, and later the first French people, were the majority population in (most parts of) Gaul.
@@nonamelenina1046 You are conflating the Franks with the French. Many used the title of "Franks"; including modern day Franconians (a group of Germans) to refer to themselves. In Byzantium and the Middle East "Franks" were used to refer, not to France, but to the people of Western Europe as a whole.
"because Francia means France in Latin"
No, Francia is an actual English word. Even the French language distinguishes France from Francia (France - Francie).
"The distinction between France and Francia is made by historians in order to differentiate the Merovingian and Carolingian period with the rest of French History."
So why do historians still refer to "Francia" as "Francia" during the Carolingian period. The Carolingians were Franks and spoke a Germanic language. It indeed exists to differentiate, just like Byzantium, as I mentioned. But not the Merovingian period from the Carolingian period. Namely, as the name implies, the Frankish period from the French period. It's really that simple.
"when ancient French language came more and more prevalent in the court administration instead of Latin"
Oh, god, there's so much wrong here. First off, the French language isn't ancient. Old French is medieval (8th century). Secondly, it didn't replace Latin among the nobility. The Frankish nobility spoke Old Frankish, unless it was in a religious context (but so did the French).
"Also the same way the term Byzantine Empire was historically never used to qualify the eastern part of the Roman Empire, at least not 300 years after the fall of Constantinople."
Correct, your point being?
"The Hellenic identity of the eastern part of the Empire has always been the case since these lands were conquered by the Republic."
There's no relation here? The Hellenic identity has always been the case because the Romans accepted Hellenic culture (in fact, they accepted many different cultures; often they never even actively tried to Romanise the regions they conquered).
"Saying that the Eastern Roman Empire was called Byzantine Empire because it was becoming more Greek is just wrong."
Yes it is wrong, but I didn't say that. I never said it "was" (at least not until the 17th century) called that way. I said we do it today for that particular reason. That being said; it's not because Philippe II decided to claim the Frankish identity, like the Byzantine Greeks, like the Germans of the HRE, like the Turkish of Rûm, like how even Russia claimed to be "Romans" or their legitimate successors that they actually were Franks/Romans.
I implore you to do a little research on who the Franks actually were, their language, as well as the (Old) French language. And perhaps maybe also do a little research on the ethnogenesis of the French people.
Also, the house of Capet was French, not Frankish (quote me a single source that makes that outrageous claim). Franks were a Germanic people and have always been so (also quote me a single source that contradicts that statement).
Also, does this sound like French or an early form of French to you? www.language-museum.com/encyclopedia/f/frankish.php
Or here for phonetics: ruclips.net/video/jefaToEtXH4/видео.html
Here's a little more information about the Frankish language: ruclips.net/video/hMrLt4iqOHk/видео.html
www.britannica.com/topic/Frankish-dialect
Wikipedia has pages about it (and Old French and Vulgar Latin) too, if you prefer that.
I suppose you're probably French. So, bonne journée!
@@ewoudalliet1734 There are may things in your answer that tries to make me say things that I didn't say.
Franks does not equate to French people, this is a fact yes, but the mingling of the Frankish people with the gallo-romans gave birth to the French people. That's what I said. During the High medieval ages, there was a distinction between the Franks and the Gallo-Roman population in Gaul, which became more blurry by the end of the Carolingian period.
The title of King of the Franks was indeed used by the French monarchy, it doesn't that I personally consider the Franks as French. I don't know where you got the idea that I'm conflating Franks with French people.
The Franks in Gaul were just a minority and formed in large part the nobility, that's why I said the House of Capet is frankish. Maybe you will disagree and call me ignorant or whatever. Instead of reading me, who is not a historian, maybe I would suggest you to read these two articles: 'The Origins of the French Nobility: A Reassessment' by Bouchard and 'Nobility and Family in Medieval France: A Review Essay' by Bisson who go far more in depth than whoever might write on RUclips can go.
It's not because Francia and Francie are actual words in English and French that my point is wrong. Francia in latin does mean France. Here again you can read, if you haven't read it, 'The "Regnum Francie" of Suger of Saint-Denis: An Expansive Ile-de-France' by Jeremy duQuesnay Adams, where the author explains the relation between France, Francia and the royal domain.
On language I used the term 'ancient French' as in Old French yeah, it doesn't look like modern French. The gallic populace spoke vulgar latin which evolved into the different languages that the people in France spoke, including the langue'Oïl. The Frankish nobility spoke Old Frankish indeed, but they did switched to latin and Old French at some point.
And I think there's nothing to add on the Eastern Roman Empire since it seems we both agree on that matter :)
Your videos are gorgeous dont give up.Love From Turkey
It would be interesting to show the french maritime territories
Vive la france 🇫🇷.
@National Anthems Perché
@National Anthems vous reviendrez bientôt ;)
Vive la France 💙 🇨🇵⚜ ✨🥳 !
Vive la France et Vive le roi!!!
@@sirruadhri3316 its a president bro
@@sirruadhri3316 Surtout pas 🤣
Napoleon 1813: i guess you can have the throne back Louis
Napoleon 1815: Lol JK
Some errors at the end: islands of reunion and comores off east african coast are still under french rule
1815: well that was fun guys, back to the iconic borders
meanwhile Britain be like: L+kingless+no consorts+touch British isles+get revolutioned
I like what Louis did, i bet that he was the best king
Which LOUIS? 💀
Yeah which Louis there was like 400 Million of them
Great job ! Very interesting ! Thanks a lot ! 👍
Thanks for watching!!
12:32
Sud America: Oh merd!
Sud Pole: ... it's the life... it's the life...
Literalmente veo este tipo de videos solamente por las canciones, son muy épicas
¡¡Muchas gracias por su apoyo!!
França assim como a maioria dos paises europeus são pequenos em territorios mais o povo soube prospera e fazer do pequeno territorio uma grande nação imagina a França com o tamanho do Brasil Índia ou Argentina
Do not forget colonisation which boosted their economy
Rosselló (northern Catalonia) was not under french rule until 1659.
22:47 Charles is not the king now but the emperor
from around 1150 where we see a large part of the territory lost, in particular Aquitaine, it is not really true, it certainly belonged to the Plantagenêts but they were not king of these territories in France but Duke (duke of Aquitaine...). is to say that these territories were still part of the kingdom of France and the Plantagenet kings had to pay tribute to the kings of France as duke of his territories in France. Besides, it posed problems because the lords of Aquitaine did not know if they should join their duke (Plantagenêt) or their king (king of France) in the event of war between the French king and the English king.
Big mistake, Brittany was independent until 1488, the duchy loss a war against France then annexed in 1532.
Good gwada thank you, and we had a large autonomy until the republican dictatorship of 1789.
How comes that NWO worthy and demonworshiper and mates with Gilles de Rais - Joan of Arc didn’t do anything to stop the annexation of Brittany?
8:00 c'est la musique dans la Belle au bois dormant ?
@fares🇨🇵 qu'est que tu racontes ?🤨
@fares🇨🇵 non c’est l hymne du royaume de France sous henri IV et le russe (je sais pas écrire son nom) l à retravaillé sous Louis XVI
@fares🇨🇵 ok dsl
2:47-3:08 : Mistakes: Should be fix from *King of Francia* to *Emperor of Francia* . At the Treaty of Verdun of 843, Charles the Bald restored the title *King of Francia*
Nope "emperor of Francia" never existed as a title. It was Rex Francorum and Western Roman Emperor or "Roman Emperor". Historians talk only about the "Carolingian Empire"
@@thibaultletricheur1884 At 800, Charlemagne was proclaimed as "Emperor" by Pope Leo, as effort for moving the Roman Empire from the East to the West.
Pope Leo was the Roman Catholic Church pope and leader of the Papal States. He knowns for helping Charlemagne which proclaimed as "Emperor", in effort to move the Roman Empire from the East to the West.
There are a lot of mistakes in your video that are being addressed in the comments, but showing the Merovingian Frankish kingdoms as a single kingdom under the King of Paris/Neustria is your biggest mistake in my opinion.
@@mochiyume7537 The Romans simply renaming the town after the name of the Parisii. Thus was then renamed Lutèce, Civitas Parisiorum or "city of Parisii". It was not until the end of the 5th century AD, due to the rise of the Gallic city under the reign of Clovis, that Paris became the capital of the kingdom of the Franks. Sorry but what you say is wrong.
@@mochiyume7537 Franks originated from between what is known today the Netherlands and northwestern Germany, not today’s Franconia. I don’t know why you’re talking about Charlemagne’s empire when I was talking about the Merovingian dynasty. And it’s Francia, not Franchise. And the capital of the empire was Aix-la-Chapelle, or Aachen, in today’s Rhineland and not in Franconia. And Paris existed for centuries as Lutetia or Civitas Parisiorum during the Roman era.
Please could I have the name of the song at 5:14 (not the french god save our king) ;)
"Marche pour la ceremonie des Turcs"
11:12 We're all here for one man and one man alone.
Do one for Serbia (631-2022)
i am not sure where you got the fact that the franks held territory so far away. The Carolingian state only expanded into the east francian area, not past the Elbe.
Yes, rather fanciful
it didn't included their dominance over Navarre, still a great video.
Francia: *invade America*
Reino Unido: NO
Francia: *Invade Europa*
Reino Unido: NO
Francia: *Invade Africa*
Reino Unido: NO
Reino Unido y Francia: amigos 🤝
XD
No friends
Djibouti 🇩🇯 gained independance in 1977 not in 1962.
It is the last French 🇨🇵 territory on the African continent (except the Scattered Islands, Mayotte, and Reunion)
Very strange. Let me understand.... Is not the legion etrangere still exercising there? It got independent really after the '77?
@@comisalessandro There has been a French military base in Djibouti since 1977. An American base also since 2002, an Italian military base, a Japanese one and a Chinese base since 2017.
which brings a lot of money to Djibouti.
Got your point! It's like a international point/help for the country... Strategic base.
You only showed France losing Alsace-Lorraine in the 1880's-1890's. But it was taken by Germany in 1871
He also didn't include the conquests of the Alemanni (Alsace, Switzerland, Baden) in the 6th century by the Franks until Charlemagne.
Guyana 💕 you don’t leave France 🇫🇷 thank you
Repose en paix pour Jacque Chirac qui est malheureusement décédé en 2018-2020
Rest in Peace
?
1932-2019 imbéciles va j'espère c'est une faute
@r Soit il est mort 2 fois soit il a eu une vie très très courte
Mistake - France controlled Djibouti until 1977 not 1962
Also morocco
Such a great country 🇲🇫!
🇷🇺
@@МеХаНиК-ф2в tg
Why Brittany inclused in 942 ? its only in 1532 brittany was attached to french kingdom. In 987; Brittany had not participated to election of Hugues Capet.
It was already part of the French kingdom. It's been part of the royal domein since 1532. That's different.
@@Leopold_van_Aubel no sorry it was not part of french kingdom before 1532
Just a small precision, Louis-Philippe was King of the French (he got elected) and not King of France.
3:09 WTF Freddy Mercury?
Also what happened to the territory?
The Frankish Empire was divided up between the sons of Louis I following his death
During the XVIII th century, there were small French territories in India, that I would not see at first glance.
0:05 Clovis joins the chat 0:22 Clovis is banned for being too old
1:27 Clovis II joins the chat 1:35 clovis is banned for dying
A count of approx population would be awesome !
That would have been great but would have already added more work onto the pile as this video was the most work I've put into any of my early videos
Petite erreur sur la carte : l'Île Maurice a été remise à la Grande-Bretagne, mais le territoire de l'île de la Réunion reste à ce jour un territoire français.
Small error on the map: Mauritius was handed over to Great Britain, but the territory of Reunion Island remains to this day a French territory.
What is the name of the song in the background of the video?
Which song do you want to know the name of?
@@sirruadhri3316 the first song in the video pls
Loved it!
Should have also mentioned their enemies so we would know with whom they are fighting with.
Fair enough, such as England in the hundred years war
@@sirruadhri3316 Also the seven years war*
Its simple the french fight with all other country.
@@nerevarindoril3435 but dude other people like me don't know which empire was fighting with them at that time
We litterally fought against every neighbourg countries
Good video
Btw WTF was this "Marseillaise" song ??!!
Lyrics are wrong !
It say "farouche" in stead of "féroce" and "marchez" instead of "marchons"
Yeah I picked it because it sounded dramatic, the words are completely wrong in some areas
It’s an older version. Some words are different.
@@Lyendith no its not the old version.
The old version does not have the same lyrics as this song. Anyway it doesn't matter the video is very good and its the only little negative point.
I only found this error since I'm french
@@shylver8 Des erreurs, il y en a un paquet : les frontières de la France qui restent inchangées après Clovis alors que son royaume est partagé entre ses fils. Ou la Syrie et le Liban, protectorats français qui n'apparaissent pas... D'autres ont déclaré avoir du d'autres erreurs auxquelles je n'ai pas prêté attention.
nice
1940 - 1944 : The correct term is "French state", "Vichy's Regim", Petain wasn't a dicator, only Hitler's puppet
What La Marseillaise's version is played?
Look up La Marseillaise Napoleon, should be the first video that comes up
@@sirruadhri3316 In 5:05, what is the title of this theme?
Pretty good but the borders are sometimes sloppy
idk why but ive been focusing more on the leaders than the expansion
Yes France has had a very interesting set of leaders
Vive la France meilleur pays de l'histoire 🇨🇵♥️
🇨🇵🥾🥾🥾
@@عباسمحمد-د1ص3ش tg
@@عباسمحمد-د1ص3ش tg
@@عباسمحمد-د1ص3ش ?
@@عباسمحمد-د1ص3ش ?
Britanny stayed fully independant until 1151, and intermitantly independant until the 16th century
Excellent
The funny thing for me is that in italian France is called Francia
How do you say England then, is it similar to the French translation of england "Angleterre"
@@sirruadhri3316 yeah, It s "Inghilterra"
@@ilbranca9208 In Spanish it is also Francia and Inglaterra.
In Greek they still call it Gallia (Gaule) which is mind blowing!
@@zied6456What is the Greekman’s name for PortuGAUL?
Excepté du gouvernement je kiffe mon pays et je suis fier d'être français 🇨🇵
La musique : Guillaume de Machaud.
Losing North America was their worst mistake... It would be much better world today...
Napoleon sold it. He desperately needed the money.
@@alyassuppaleridhil7892 he is an idiot then
@@КнязьМышкин-и9р the greates person
@@КнязьМышкин-и9р if you wanna know how big losser or a great person Napoleon was please go and see oversimplified video
@@КнязьМышкин-и9р il a conquit la plupart de l'Europe, a vassalisé la Prusse et l'Autriche, a soumit la Russie et la obligé à être son allié et enfin il a détruit des amées avec ses subordonnés alors qu'elles pouvaient être trois fois plus nombreuses en étant à la tête d'une armée qui été souvant défavorisé comme par exemple la campagne de France de 1814.
Precision, Napoléon Ier and III, also King Louis XVI after 1790 and Kings Louis XVIII, Charles X and Louis Philippe I arent at the head of France but French, which is significantly different.
Intéressant ! Mon pays ♥️
Mon pays aussi!!
@@sirruadhri3316 Tu est Français ?
It s a little bit imprecise when you show the territories of france near Italy and in Italy but it s ok overall
Salut !
en 1969 c'est Georges Pompidou ! ;) il manque le "p"!
When you’ve actually directly traced your ancestors to both the Capetian and dynasty before that totally not me
Most people in modern day France could in theory all be descended from the Capetians with how long ago they were formed but it would be impressive to be able to trace back your lineage all the way back to then
@@sirruadhri3316 yeah what’s cool though is on my moms side her mom traced back to the caroligegin dynasty and her dad traced back to the Capetian dynasty so they are traced back to relatives but from 2 diff family members
10:17 music??
Anthem of the Bourbon Restoration
Hey, what are your sources to do this episode ? :)
i may not be a historian but where is leon blum between the 2 world wars?
He was prime minister, not president
right, the french communist party (PCF) was the majority at that time
The very last présidents of on this list doesnt deserve to appear. They are a shame to french history. Gave our country to arabs and financials without even a fight. Just for their narrow interests.
Et surtout, surtout, vive la France !
Nice choice of set of musics by the way.
3:07 Well, that was quick 😅
There was 3 francia at that moment. Not shown in the vod.
Ima need to know the name of the song in the beginning
Look up Guillaume de Machaut
🇨🇵 Vive la France 🇨🇵
4:25 name of this song?
Grande Dieu sauve le roi
The original version of the GB anthem.
@@hrafneldr9086 exact !
This animation is wrong Brittany was independant till 1532
The territorial expantion of Azteca Empire and Mexico
Buenísimo!