How officials spend Norwegian taxpayers' money. «Do you have TWO passports from DIFFERENT countries? Then come to Norway and receive an additional THIRD residence permit (asylum for Russian citizens) at the expense of Norwegian taxpayers)». “For reporting this - collective deportation of disabled Ukrainians (members of the international anti-corruption movement) to Ukraine or Russia (when their family lived in Ukraine before moving to the European Union).
“Do you have TWO passports of DIFFERENT states? Come to Norway and get a THIRD residence permit (asylum for Russian citizens) at the expense of Norwegian taxpayers)). "For reporting this - collective deportation of the applicant (Ukrainian-disabled) to Russia. According to the authorities (letters to Ukraine), the reunification, outside Norway, of a family of Ukrainian citizens, whose members have not seen each other for FOUR years , cannot be interpreted as an urgent need of Ukrainians (with Polish roots), who, prior to the collective deportation of disabled people from Norway to Russia, notified the authorities on granting, at the expense of Norwegian taxpayers, asylums in Norway (# 3) to citizens of the Russian Federation who already have TWO citizenship (# 1, # 2) (with the assistance of Russian-speaking organizations in Norway).
Let the Norwegians (from a NATO country) tell how they abducted (from Norway back to Ukraine) in handcuffs (without a trial and an interpreter) those disabled citizens of Ukraine (political scientists and human rights activists), who fought corruption in Ukraine, and in Norway organized free language courses for Russian speakers. /// We are talking about those kind Norwegians who forcibly separated the families of Ukrainians (kidnapping members of their families - fighters against corruption with disabilities, whom the family has not seen for 3 years, because the Norwegians prevent their reunification). /// Crimes in the NATO country against disabled Ukrainians (participants in anti-corruption pickets of Ukrainian human rights activists in Norway) were committed by those Norwegians who condemn the voluntary relocation of Ukrainians to the Russian Federation WITHOUT separating their families. /// Citizens of Ukraine filed collective applications with the ECHR and The Hague crime of Norwegians against Ukrainians. Ctizens of Ukraine (political scientists who teach the language to refugees in Norway) announced the abduction by Norwegians of Ukrainians with disabilities (human rights activists) and the crime of Norwegians against Ukrainians - participants in pickets of Ukrainians (disabled) in a NATO country, who defended their right not to be repressed in Norway for their human rights activities .. Wс
“Do you have TWO passports of DIFFERENT states? Come to Norway and get a THIRD residence permit (asylum for Russian citizens) at the expense of Norwegian taxpayers)). "For reporting this - collective deportation of the applicant (Ukrainian-disabled) to Russia. According to the authorities (letters to Ukraine), the reunification, outside Norway, of a family of Ukrainian citizens, whose members have not seen each other for FOUR years , cannot be interpreted as an urgent need of Ukrainians (with Polish roots), who, prior to the collective deportation of disabled people from Norway to Russia, notified the authorities on granting, at the expense of Norwegian taxpayers, asylums in Norway (# 3) to citizens of the Russian Federation who already have TWO citizenship (# 1, # 2) (with the assistance of Russian-speaking organizations in Norway).
I am a citizen of Russia. I also have a second citizenship. And Norway also gave me additional asylum (residence permit). It is very good that Norway deports Ukrainians back to Ukraine or Russia, and gives asylum to Russians! This is very fair)))😮🎉😂
I only speak Ukrainian. I am using google translator. Therefore, please excuse me if the translation is bad! I am from Western Ukraine. I am a nurse and I save lives. I live now in Germany. I need a lawyer to file, with other disabled citizens of Ukraine, a lawsuit against Norway. My husband, a Ukrainian (oil worker, human rights activist) became disabled as a result of his defense of the rights of other people (Norwegian and Russian media for 9 years). My husband fought corruption in the Russian oil giant, which was headed by the founder of the 6th Directorate of the FSB and the ex-Chancellor of Germany. My husband defended the rights of disabled people and Ukrainians in Norway against Russian-speaking citizens of this NATO country. The Norwegians took my disabled husband to Moscow AFTER: anti-war pickets of my husband in the Russian Federation, his defense of the rights of Ukrainians in Norway, the issuance of documents to my husband by the Norwegian Red Cross for his close relatives (Polish servicemen repressed by the Russians), sentencing his defender to prison (in married to a citizen of Finland for 25 years) in Belarus, who reported the crime of the Norwegians against the Ukrainians and was recognized as a Political prisoner. My husband and his lawyer warned the Norwegians about the coming war, but they did not believe him. The husband was kidnapped and the war began. And after the war began, the Norwegians do NOT admit their mistakes! Unlike the Swedes, the Norwegians DO NOT LIKE to admit their mistakes even when the Chechen refugees deported by the Norwegians were killed in the Russian Federation (Norwegian media).
@@olechristianhenne6583 How officials spend Norwegian taxpayers' money. «Do you have TWO passports from DIFFERENT countries? Then come to Norway and receive an additional THIRD residence permit (asylum for Russian citizens) at the expense of Norwegian taxpayers)». “For reporting this - collective deportation of disabled Ukrainians (members of the international anti-corruption movement) to Ukraine or Russia (when their family lived in Ukraine before moving to the European Union). 😮
@@olechristianhenne6583 “Do you have TWO passports of DIFFERENT states? Come to Norway and get a THIRD residence permit (asylum for Russian citizens) at the expense of Norwegian taxpayers)). "For reporting this - collective deportation of the applicant (Ukrainian-disabled) to Russia. According to the authorities (letters to Ukraine), the reunification, outside Norway, of a family of Ukrainian citizens, whose members have not seen each other for FOUR years , cannot be interpreted as an urgent need of Ukrainians (with Polish roots), who, prior to the collective deportation of disabled people from Norway to Russia, notified the authorities on granting, at the expense of Norwegian taxpayers, asylums in Norway (# 3) to citizens of the Russian Federation who already have TWO citizenship (# 1, # 2) (with the assistance of Russian-speaking organizations in Norway).
@@olechristianhenne6583 Colleagues of the spouse-opponent of the Russian-speaking citizens of Norway demanded from the authorities in collective statements: - carry out a thorough, sufficient and effective verification of the facts of the violation of rights, as provided for in § 96 of the judgment of 28.06.07 in the case of Wagner v. Luxembourg. Those. conduct a formal investigation into crimes - be guided by Art. 16 of the UN Convention against Corruption and paragraph 2 of Art. 3 of the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime. - when considering collective allegations of a crime, apply the UN Convention against Corruption ) and the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (articles: 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 31). - admit that the authorities violated, first of all, the International Code of Conduct for Public Servants, contained in the annex to the resolution 51/59 of the UN General Assembly of December 12, 1996, art. 41 of the Founding Charter of the EU. Rights and others. - Strictly comply with paragraph "a" of Article 6 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. - the competent authorities of Norway, in the absence of CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS (PRIOR to deportation) for crimes, to pay fair compensation to ALL victims of the inaction of the authorities (Article 13 of the Convention, § 71 of the judgment of 26 July 2011 in the case of Georgel and Georgeta Stoeiscu v. Romania) ( §§ 102, 105 of the judgment of 26 May 2020 in Gremina v. Russia). - consider the application on the basis of international law, applying the principle of proportionality and protection of the violated rights guaranteed by these norms (paragraph 10.4 of the HRC Views of 10/20/98 in the case of Dae Hong Pak v. the Republic of Korea, § 27 of the Judgment of 05/17/18 in the case " Latifi v. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia). According to Article 1 of the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders: "EVERYONE has the right, individually and TOGETHER WITH OTHERS, to promote and strive for the protection and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms at the national and international levels", which also applies to deported opponents of Russian-speaking citizens of Norway. According to the Helsinki Accords, the protection of human rights is an international matter, not a matter of only one state. - when considering this complaint, the competent international bodies also apply the provisions of INTERNATIONAL LAW No. S284 (MAGNITSKY LAW), and impose PERSONAL sanctions against violators of human rights, adopted on the basis of the Magnitsky Act. - not to commit crimes against a disabled person (PRIOR to deportation), not to violate the right to information guaranteed by Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; article 19, paragraph 2, of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; article 10, paragraph 1, of the Convention on Human Rights. -recognize the rights of the fighter against corruption violated and ensure their restoration (according to Norwegian law and international law (articles: 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 22, 23, 25, 26 of the Covenant, articles: 2, 3, 5, article 6, paragraph 1, articles: 8, 10, 13, 14, 17, 18 of the European Convention on Human Rights, article 1, paragraph 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights rights; articles: 1, 2; article 3, paragraph 1; articles 4, 6-8, 11, 17, 20, 21, 41, 42, 47 of the EU Charter)...
У меня 2 паспорта (РФ и Украины) + ВНЖ в Норвегии. Я украинец и полон сил и здоровья))) Но Свидетелей Иеговы не призывают на войну, а суды Украина всегда проигрывает, при попытках призвать наших братьев (Церковь то американская, поэтому руки коротки что-то сделать))) Для получения документов в РФ, а затем и в Норвегии я 1). Сначала уехал из ЛНР в Воронеж. 2). Потом, как Свидетель Иеговы из РФ, после запрета СИ в РФ, получил убежище в Норвегии (до войны). Моральную поддержку мне (и не только))) оказало наше русскоговорящее Собрание Осло. А все несогласные с этим украинцы с одним паспортом, у кого я брал уроки языка, были депортированы из Норвегии в Украину или РФ. Не спасло их и то, что стали инвалидами, защищая права других, о чем писали СМИ. Ну, не надо им было идти на пикеты и в полицию, и заявлять, что американскую церковь никто не пресследует в Украине (все события были до войны) и то, что отказ от украинского гражданства не влечет его потерю. Это же решать не им, а UDI))) А за донос на русское Собрание депорт каждого! А я прекрасно живу, с семьей, на юге, в Фредрикстаде, чего и всем желаю))). Да, и у меня не временная защита,а полноценное убежище, т.к. из РФ приехал.😂😂😂😂
How officials spend Norwegian taxpayers' money.
«Do you have TWO passports from DIFFERENT countries? Then come to Norway and receive an additional THIRD residence permit (asylum for Russian citizens) at the expense of Norwegian taxpayers)». “For reporting this - collective deportation of disabled Ukrainians (members of the international anti-corruption movement) to Ukraine or Russia (when their family lived in Ukraine
before moving to the European Union).
“Do you have TWO passports of DIFFERENT states? Come to Norway and get a THIRD residence permit (asylum for Russian citizens) at the expense of Norwegian taxpayers)). "For reporting this - collective deportation of the applicant (Ukrainian-disabled) to Russia.
According to the authorities (letters to Ukraine), the reunification, outside Norway, of a family of Ukrainian citizens, whose members have not seen each other for FOUR years , cannot be interpreted as an urgent need of Ukrainians (with Polish roots), who, prior to the collective deportation of disabled people from Norway to Russia, notified the authorities on granting, at the expense of Norwegian taxpayers, asylums in Norway (# 3) to citizens of the Russian Federation who already have TWO citizenship (# 1, # 2) (with the assistance of Russian-speaking organizations in Norway).
Let the Norwegians (from a NATO country) tell how they abducted (from Norway back to Ukraine) in handcuffs (without a trial and an interpreter) those disabled citizens of Ukraine (political scientists and human rights activists), who fought corruption in Ukraine, and in Norway organized free language courses for Russian speakers. /// We are talking about those kind Norwegians who forcibly separated the families of Ukrainians (kidnapping members of their families - fighters against corruption with disabilities, whom the family has not seen for 3 years, because the Norwegians prevent their reunification). /// Crimes in the NATO country against disabled Ukrainians (participants in anti-corruption pickets of Ukrainian human rights activists in Norway) were committed by those Norwegians who condemn the voluntary relocation of Ukrainians to the Russian Federation WITHOUT separating their families. /// Citizens of Ukraine filed collective applications with the ECHR and The Hague crime of Norwegians against Ukrainians.
Ctizens of Ukraine (political scientists who teach the language to refugees in Norway) announced the abduction by Norwegians of Ukrainians with disabilities (human rights activists) and the crime of Norwegians against Ukrainians - participants in pickets of Ukrainians (disabled) in a NATO country, who defended their right not to be repressed in Norway for their human rights activities ..
Wс
“Do you have TWO passports of DIFFERENT states? Come to Norway and get a THIRD residence permit (asylum for Russian citizens) at the expense of Norwegian taxpayers)). "For reporting this - collective deportation of the applicant (Ukrainian-disabled) to Russia.
According to the authorities (letters to Ukraine), the reunification, outside Norway, of a family of Ukrainian citizens, whose members have not seen each other for FOUR years , cannot be interpreted as an urgent need of Ukrainians (with Polish roots), who, prior to the collective deportation of disabled people from Norway to Russia, notified the authorities on granting, at the expense of Norwegian taxpayers, asylums in Norway (# 3) to citizens of the Russian Federation who already have TWO citizenship (# 1, # 2) (with the assistance of Russian-speaking organizations in Norway).
I am a citizen of Russia. I also have a second citizenship. And Norway also gave me additional asylum (residence permit). It is very good that Norway deports Ukrainians back to Ukraine or Russia, and gives asylum to Russians! This is very fair)))😮🎉😂
I only speak Ukrainian. I am using google translator. Therefore, please excuse me if the translation is bad! I am from Western Ukraine. I am a nurse and I save lives. I live now in Germany. I need a lawyer to file, with other disabled citizens of Ukraine, a lawsuit against Norway. My husband, a Ukrainian (oil worker, human rights activist) became disabled as a result of his defense of the rights of other people (Norwegian and Russian media for 9 years). My husband fought corruption in the Russian oil giant, which was headed by the founder of the 6th Directorate of the FSB and the ex-Chancellor of Germany. My husband defended the rights of disabled people and Ukrainians in Norway against Russian-speaking citizens of this NATO country. The Norwegians took my disabled husband to Moscow AFTER: anti-war pickets of my husband in the Russian Federation, his defense of the rights of Ukrainians in Norway, the issuance of documents to my husband by the Norwegian Red Cross for his close relatives (Polish servicemen repressed by the Russians), sentencing his defender to prison (in married to a citizen of Finland for 25 years) in Belarus, who reported the crime of the Norwegians against the Ukrainians and was recognized as a Political prisoner. My husband and his lawyer warned the Norwegians about the coming war, but they did not believe him. The husband was kidnapped and the war began. And after the war began, the Norwegians do NOT admit their mistakes! Unlike the Swedes, the Norwegians DO NOT LIKE to admit their mistakes even when the Chechen refugees deported by the Norwegians were killed in the Russian Federation (Norwegian media).
Where's is your husband now?!?
@@olechristianhenne6583 I'm in Germany.
My husband was deported to Russia while I was living in Ukraine.
@@olechristianhenne6583
How officials spend Norwegian taxpayers' money.
«Do you have TWO passports from DIFFERENT countries? Then come to Norway and receive an additional THIRD residence permit (asylum for Russian citizens) at the expense of Norwegian taxpayers)». “For reporting this - collective deportation of disabled Ukrainians (members of the international anti-corruption movement) to Ukraine or Russia (when their family lived in Ukraine
before moving to the European Union).
😮
@@olechristianhenne6583
“Do you have TWO passports of DIFFERENT states? Come to Norway and get a THIRD residence permit (asylum for Russian citizens) at the expense of Norwegian taxpayers)). "For reporting this - collective deportation of the applicant (Ukrainian-disabled) to Russia.
According to the authorities (letters to Ukraine), the reunification, outside Norway, of a family of Ukrainian citizens, whose members have not seen each other for FOUR years , cannot be interpreted as an urgent need of Ukrainians (with Polish roots), who, prior to the collective deportation of disabled people from Norway to Russia, notified the authorities on granting, at the expense of Norwegian taxpayers, asylums in Norway (# 3) to citizens of the Russian Federation who already have TWO citizenship (# 1, # 2) (with the assistance of Russian-speaking organizations in Norway).
@@olechristianhenne6583
Colleagues of the spouse-opponent of the Russian-speaking citizens of Norway demanded from the authorities in collective statements:
- carry out a thorough, sufficient and effective verification of the facts of the violation of rights, as provided for in § 96 of the judgment of 28.06.07 in the case of Wagner v. Luxembourg. Those. conduct a formal investigation into crimes
- be guided by Art. 16 of the UN Convention against Corruption and paragraph 2 of Art. 3 of the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime.
- when considering collective allegations of a crime, apply the UN Convention against Corruption ) and the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (articles: 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 31).
- admit that the authorities violated, first of all, the International Code of Conduct for Public Servants, contained in the annex to the resolution 51/59 of the UN General Assembly of December 12, 1996, art. 41 of the Founding Charter of the EU. Rights and others.
- Strictly comply with paragraph "a" of Article 6 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
- the competent authorities of Norway, in the absence of CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS (PRIOR to deportation) for crimes, to pay fair compensation to ALL victims of the inaction of the authorities (Article 13 of the Convention, § 71 of the judgment of 26 July 2011 in the case of Georgel and Georgeta Stoeiscu v. Romania) ( §§ 102, 105 of the judgment of 26 May 2020 in Gremina v. Russia).
- consider the application on the basis of international law, applying the principle of proportionality and protection of the violated rights guaranteed by these norms (paragraph 10.4 of the HRC Views of 10/20/98 in the case of Dae Hong Pak v. the Republic of Korea, § 27 of the Judgment of 05/17/18 in the case " Latifi v. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia).
According to Article 1 of the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders: "EVERYONE has the right, individually and TOGETHER WITH OTHERS, to promote and strive for the protection and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms at the national and international levels", which also applies to deported opponents of Russian-speaking citizens of Norway.
According to the Helsinki Accords, the protection of human rights is an international matter, not a matter of only one state.
- when considering this complaint, the competent international bodies also apply the provisions of INTERNATIONAL LAW No. S284 (MAGNITSKY LAW), and impose PERSONAL sanctions against violators of human rights, adopted on the basis of the Magnitsky Act.
- not to commit crimes against a disabled person (PRIOR to deportation), not to violate the right to information guaranteed by Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; article 19, paragraph 2, of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; article 10, paragraph 1, of the Convention on Human Rights.
-recognize the rights of the fighter against corruption violated and ensure their restoration (according to Norwegian law and international law (articles: 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 22, 23, 25, 26 of the Covenant, articles: 2, 3, 5, article 6, paragraph 1, articles: 8, 10, 13, 14, 17, 18 of the European Convention on Human Rights, article 1, paragraph 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights rights; articles: 1, 2; article 3, paragraph 1; articles 4, 6-8, 11, 17, 20, 21, 41, 42, 47 of the EU Charter)...
У меня 2 паспорта (РФ и Украины) + ВНЖ в Норвегии.
Я украинец и полон сил и здоровья)))
Но Свидетелей Иеговы не призывают на войну, а суды Украина всегда проигрывает, при попытках призвать наших братьев (Церковь то американская, поэтому руки коротки что-то сделать)))
Для получения документов в РФ, а затем и в Норвегии я
1). Сначала уехал из ЛНР в Воронеж.
2). Потом, как Свидетель Иеговы из РФ, после запрета СИ в РФ, получил убежище в Норвегии (до войны).
Моральную поддержку мне (и не только))) оказало наше русскоговорящее Собрание Осло.
А все несогласные с этим украинцы с одним паспортом, у кого я брал уроки языка, были депортированы из Норвегии в Украину или РФ.
Не спасло их и то, что стали инвалидами, защищая права других, о чем писали СМИ.
Ну, не надо им было идти на пикеты и в полицию, и заявлять, что американскую церковь никто не пресследует в Украине (все события были до войны)
и то, что отказ от украинского гражданства не влечет его потерю.
Это же решать не им, а UDI)))
А за донос на русское Собрание депорт каждого!
А я прекрасно живу, с семьей, на юге, в Фредрикстаде, чего и всем желаю))).
Да, и у меня не временная защита,а полноценное убежище, т.к. из РФ приехал.😂😂😂😂