1989 Upper Deck cards were actually somewhat oversized out of the factory, so it would be highly unusual for it to be the standard size without trimming. And if it were undersized, they would call out "minimum size" rather than trimming. When they return "evidence of trimming", they're observing an anomaly along the edges rather than calling out the size.
That Griffey Jr rookie is a real head scratcher. Were they afraid to give it grade? I am sure they graded hundreds of them over the years. I would crack it and resubmit it.
Luv the vids, and commentary! U guys re- invergerated me ! Just sent in and got back 21 cards ,70’s -mid 80’s cards from sgc! Gwynns , cal Ripken’s, Ozzie rc, and other good stuff , sending more in soon , thanks again for the spark gentlemen!!
This is a prime example of why I don't get my cards graded. I watched you guys pull that '89 Jr rc, and to see it come back with that grade, WTF, are they high? To grade or not to grade, to each his own. You guys' rock and keep the great ripping videos coming, be safe.
You obviously haven’t grasped the concept of grading. It’s just another man’s or woman’s opinion. It doesn’t mean they’re wrong or right. It’s subjective.
Great video as usual guys. Looks like a crease/wrinkle running vertically through the R, in Robinson. Also has lots of surface imperfections above his last name.
Nice reveal Snake and Rusty!! Wow hammered time.. I watched you pull that Griffey..trimmed B$!! I have a 58’ Maris new holder PSA 4 ..and it looks like a 4, your 58’ Maris looks at least like a “6” you got reamed in that one!! Cricky!! Outstanding 80’ Nolan!! Thanks Guys!!
I sent a 1968 Nolan Ryan to SGC, came back a 7. I thought the card was better than that, so cracked it out and submitted to PSA. Got Evidence of trimming. Cracked it out again and submitted to SGC, got Evidence of trimming second time when they graded it a 7 two months earlier. Makes no sense at all.
Irritating on the Griffey. Grading companies grade actual trimmed cards, but reject pack pulled ones. I was so rooting for a 7 for your 58 Roger. Like you said, yours is crazy crisp and colorful. Most others I see are hazy.
I have a question for you guys, do you get your cards graded for free? Reason I ask, the grades you are predicting for these cards aren’t worth sending in. Just curious if you get your cards graded for free.
1989 Upper Deck cards were actually somewhat oversized out of the factory, so it would be highly unusual for it to be the standard size without trimming. And if it were undersized, they would call out "minimum size" rather than trimming. When they return "evidence of trimming", they're observing an anomaly along the edges rather than calling out the size.
great Pappas RC all those cards look great in a tux!
Man, that Griffey. Crazy they said there was trimming!
Awesome cards! Tough break on the Griffey!
That Griffey Jr rookie is a real head scratcher. Were they afraid to give it grade? I am sure they graded hundreds of them over the years. I would crack it and resubmit it.
Why did you trim that Griffey???
LOL
Luv the vids, and commentary! U guys re- invergerated me ! Just sent in and got back 21 cards ,70’s -mid 80’s cards from sgc! Gwynns , cal Ripken’s, Ozzie rc, and other good stuff , sending more in soon , thanks again for the spark gentlemen!!
SGC is usually very consistent but I feel they were really tough on this submission
This is a prime example of why I don't get my cards graded. I watched you guys pull that '89 Jr rc, and to see it come back with that grade, WTF, are they high? To grade or not to grade, to each his own. You guys' rock and keep the great ripping videos coming, be safe.
You obviously haven’t grasped the concept of grading. It’s just another man’s or woman’s opinion. It doesn’t mean they’re wrong or right. It’s subjective.
Great video as usual guys. Looks like a crease/wrinkle running vertically through the R, in Robinson. Also has lots of surface imperfections above his last name.
Super nice 5 on the Maris! Disappointing about the Griffey though. Nice cards as always
Nice reveal Snake and Rusty!! Wow hammered time.. I watched you pull that Griffey..trimmed B$!! I have a 58’ Maris new holder PSA 4 ..and it looks like a 4, your 58’ Maris looks at least like a “6” you got reamed in that one!! Cricky!! Outstanding 80’ Nolan!! Thanks Guys!!
Great returns fellas!! Sorry bout that Griffey! Crack that sucker out and resubmit!!!
Thank you for a good video. Better luck next time. Have a great week.
I sent a 1968 Nolan Ryan to SGC, came back a 7. I thought the card was better than that, so cracked it out and submitted to PSA. Got Evidence of trimming. Cracked it out again and submitted to SGC, got Evidence of trimming second time when they graded it a 7 two months earlier. Makes no sense at all.
I would send the Griffey to PSA.
Great video, tough results except for 2 or 3 of them
Irritating on the Griffey. Grading companies grade actual trimmed cards, but reject pack pulled ones. I was so rooting for a 7 for your 58 Roger. Like you said, yours is crazy crisp and colorful. Most others I see are hazy.
Awesome 👏
I agree SGC Usually are good about this contact them they will listen
Awesome Roger Maris rookie! 🙂
Cards lookin good all suited up in a fresh tux
That Griffey is just a hole in the boat. They dirty done you wrong!
Great cards though, fellas!
Fun reveal I think you guys did well
Fantastic video and great graded cards
Griffey’s a head scratcher for sure
Blows my mind sgc doesn’t know modern cards like the 89 upper deck set and said that was trimmed. They do good with vintage but sheesh.
Really love the nolan
I have a question for you guys, do you get your cards graded for free? Reason I ask, the grades you are predicting for these cards aren’t worth sending in. Just curious if you get your cards graded for free.
Maris deserved better
If you want to lose money grading cards. Watch these guys. 🤦♂️
Really nice Maris! No way Griffey out of the pack should get an A/Evidence of Trimming though, that’s rough. Otherwise another great submission!