@@maximilianbatz2070 THANK YOU!!!! How bloody ironic is it that he talks about our ability to distinguish sounds while there's this incessant dog-training click going on in the background...
It is also a miracle that I'm able to watch such a well designed lecture by a renowned professor liguistics on the internet FOR FREE! It's a great time to be alive.
I wish all education system was on the internet for free! Paid by sponsors and such. An online, free enrollment with a schedule for who ever wants. Free books, access to everything free.. It is in the corner i guess. I can see that future.
I majored in linguistics and although Dr. Pinker is not a pure linguist, he gives one of the best and most accessible descriptions of a brief overview of linguistics. Truly an amazing subject and it is such a disappointment that there are no linguistics classes in any high school in the world pretty much. A class in linguistics, even just a class in syntax, would help so many more people be able to learn new languages quickly and efficiently. Not just that, but more people would have a deep understanding of themselves and others.
@@labelrouge9891 His specialty is not in Linguistics, it’s in Psycholinguistics. He focuses more on the mechanics and anatomy of the brain with regard to language as a faculty of the human experience and also how psychology affects and is affected by language. Basically, to put it in laymen’s terms, his expertise is not strictly within phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, or pragmatics but rather how any or all of each of those presents in the brain and psychology of a native speaker of any given language. Pragmatics would most closely align with his field and of course he has great understanding of each topic, more so than the lay person, but it is my understanding that none of those core foundational aspects of the field of linguistics are his specialty. Someone like Noam, on the other hand…pure linguist. Dude pioneered X-bar theory in syntax and has done several other works on groundbreaking stuff in modern linguistics. He’s a bit crazy, but a great linguist.
I love it too, but I hope that some ideas will have progressed in 20 years. Anyway, this thinker will remain precious and always interesting to study, even in 20 years and even if he may have been wrong in places.
I love how clearly this man thinks. Its clarity layed gently onto silence. Like listening to a pure chime from one of those Tibetan buddhist singning bowls.
The sign of creative intelligence (inherent in the author of this comment @helimax): The ability to absorb specific concretized information, extrapolate upon it, integrate the latter with the former, resulting in the formation of an opinion, to then correlate it abstractively with sound, as a means to express that which is otherwise ineffable, yet is understood, PRECISELY THROUGH said abstraction. Ahh, the magic of art!! Well done!
That is an excellent definition of art. The abstract idea or feeling you once felt or always thought ineffable, until it mysteriously arises from the page/canvass/screen like a long lost friend. @@AndImOkayWithIt
What six minutes and he did not address the subject matter! You poor deluded fools, you just want to thank people society identity famous without thought. What's in your head Zombie? Stooges maybe
I absolutely love the way Steven explains things in his lectures. He doesn't over express words that don't need to be to show his intelligence. Profess Pinker is a brilliant man and awesome teacher.
An essential trait of mastering your craft is being able to teach the vastness of its content, with all its intrinsic and numerous permutations and exceptions, in simple language to the layman or apprentice. It shows a deep level of knowledge synthesis and understanding in that discipline. Someone who has not mastered their craft are not intrinsically good teachers - at least for STEM careers. I have noticed an easy "tell" (poker) is when a student asks them an unusual or lateral but valid question and they either brush it off like a politician would "I'll answer questions at the end of the lecture" (when the asker has conveniently forgotten it or now just wants to go home) or over-simplifying/altering the proposed question to make it easier to answer. Hence the term "master and apprentice". Masters by definition must always be able to effectively teach.
Haha. And the remote control he's holding changed from a black one to an Apple TV remote controller. Maybe they had some technical issues and he bought a MacBook with him haha
When I watch something like this, it kills me. I was taught in a, 'just learn it' environment. Not in an, exploratory arena. This vid (Imo) is a fantastic example of how we should learn.
100 percent! Engagement is the key to learning. Picking up a textbook can be pretty intimidating for some people, but videos like these have the ability to spark a level of understanding which leads people (like me) to explore a topic in much more detail.
Most of us, including me, don’t value enough the fact that so much information is shared on the internet for free! I just watch them for entertainment without realising how much I’ve actually learnt, and how much more I could have learnt with a more educational mindset. Thank you!
We live in a great age, Big Think and free and quick exchange of information is just amazing. To have,in this instance, 30 years of (basic) knowledge of linguistics summarized in an hour long video, truly spectacular. :) You have my thanks.
This is excellent. Structural linguistics is my favourite subject. I will be going back over this while taking notes to fill in the many blanks I am discovering. This video will influence future book purchases.
The dumbing down of America has been completed. In a few short weeks, the morons will be running the country and anyone deemed to be "too smart" will be subject to ridicule and/or physical harm, just like back in sixth grade. Instead of trolling comments on instructive videos that are beyond your intellectual abilities, Kevin, why don't you just apply to be Trump's Secretary of State?
Maravillosa síntesis de la teoría lingüística! El ejemplo del bebé es muy bueno. Un niño que solo balbucea puede indicar con el dedo algo que quiere, emitir un sonido que aún no es lengua y expresar un deseo, antes de ser capaz de usar una oración completa y con sentido: un tipo de pensamiento, que ya discrimina la realidad, pero no en palabras. Muy buen video. Que suerte tienen algunos de ustedes que lo tuvieron de profesor
I have been fascinated by language and how we speak for a long time. I love studying other languages to see the difference in rules of grammar as well as words. I have studied Mandarin for years and have become aware of a vastly different way of expression with different grammatical rules. Even French and Italian, though more closely related to English, have their own uniqueness.
What I find fascinating regarding linguistics as a computer programmer is how we can use assembly mnemonics and the language syntax to control the flow of electricity in a computers components. Here we find that language has mathematical properties.
This was truly awesome. It flows. Very well constructed. My first language is Portugese but I could understant everything and relate to the content. Beautiful. I'll watch it again in the future. The more I learn, the more I can teach. Thank you so much.
The probability of "green ideas" being uttered has increased greatly since "Green" became associated with environmentalism and specific political philosophies.
It's a bit fuzzy because Pinker originally studied Psychology but in recent years/decades, he has almost exclusively worked in the field of linguistics. I have myself studied linguistics and we were given several texts by Pinker to read. So, he doesn't just do this as a hobby, he actually researches and publishes academic papers in the field of linguistics.
and that illustrates how language works. (actually not = a kind of; in this case, a person with a different diploma) Now, stop thinking about elephants!
I have myself a Bachelor's and a Master's degree in linguistics and still I have very much enjoyed this lecture. It neatly summarizes what I have learned over the course of many years. However, as a non-native English speaker, there is one feature that I must admit still isn't entirely clear to me. Namely, it is that of "he be workin'" in AAVE. Professor Pinker notes that this feature is unique to AAVE and that it means something like: "he's got a job" (as opposed to "he's working right now, in this moment"). I also learned about this during my undergrad studies and was told by my professors that it is "unique to AAVE". However, from what I can tell, the meaning of "he's got a job" also exists in General American English or RP in the form of the simple present "he works". So, apparently the sentence: "he be workin' at a hospital" (AAVE) is different from "he works at a hospital" (RP). However, I can't quite understand where the difference lies. They seem to express the same idea, yet I'm told the former means something different because it contains a grammatical feature that only exists in AAVE. I'm sure some of the fine folks in this comment section can unravel this mystery for me :).
In AAVE, the “habitual be” emphasizes that an action is habitual or recurring. So it would be more accurate to say “He be working” means that he has been working on a regular basis (and still is). Then, by implication, since he works regularly, he likely has a job.
If you wanna know more about languages, logic, and interesting facts & trivia about language etc, I recommend NativLang on youtube. Very high quality videos, but for some reason the videos gets a very very low view count. He also got an interesting playlist about the construction of human language.
Excellent, thank you, Steven Pinker! At 71, it's nice to pick up on a subject that interests me very much, but never studied. Interesting how this instantly available, free, attractive and beautifully organized lecture is so satisfying. And I can save it and watch again. I've ordered one of your books and will enjoy it more being able to visualize you speaking.
Very good explanation of language from the perspective of cognitive science. I'm picking cognitive linguistics as my future study goal. Thank you Prof. Pinker.
Wow, what a fascinating lecture! Pinker is an amazing intellect! Last year I read a great book of his called The Better Angels of Our Nature, in which he very convincingly argues that human society has been steadily improving throughout our history, contrary to what many people believe. I'd love to delve further into his work! Thanks for sharing this video.
Oh! If you had the time, and wouldn't mind, what's the one paragraph from that book that would leave me curious enough to buy it myself ? :3 (Thank you, I hope. Lol)
@@janebanedoe9917 This is what caused me to buy it: I read from reviews that he proposed a theory of constant human progress to increasing nonviolence. I wondered how he fit the first half of the twentieth century, with its two world wars, the Holocaust, the Armenian Genocide, the slaughter involved in the partition of India, etc. into his scheme. He managed to do it, but I still wonder what it would have taken to make him question his thesis.
I'm a computer scientist student and after watching this I'm going to study linguistics more. As it has more of an impact on my work than I've been lead to believe in my classes.
If pinker and doctor sapolsky meet at a bar...what would they talk about?..imagine how much knowledge those professors have...it would be one of the most interesting chats two human beings may have
+Milo I think Pinker makes a powerful statement about overt conservative racism vs covert liberal racism here. by his definition of ebonics and how it is the cultural norm of black society he shows us that covert racism is more acceptable. and that socially engineering a culture to kill itself is more accepted than killing that culture directly. also by criticizing covert racism, you as an individual can be marginalized as a racist. or in the case that you're black, marginalized and ostracized as an "uncle tom" note how he uses linguistics to link "ebonics" to "african americans"
+alvisc2002 Okay, let me begin by saying that I earned a bachelor's degree in Sociology from San Diego State University. I am extremely familiar with overt/covert racism and I always love a good race conversation. So, I made that comment, not to criticize covert racism, but rather, to highlight how funny and awkward Mr. Pinker sounds. Simple humor, nothing more(I understand that this is hard to interpret via the comment section on RUclips). Now, for the more important issue at hand, what in the WORLD are you talking about? Could Mr. Pinker's comments be considered as covert racism? Absolutely. Associating bad grammar and spelling with a certain ethnic group, with such normality, is definitely along those lines. Merriam-Webster defines racism as: 1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race 2 : racial prejudice or discrimination www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/racism I personally prefer the second definition, as I feel it is more accurate. Racism is racism. It can be overt and it can be covert. It is a negative ideal that has greatly affected the world around us. I chuckle when others use the words "conservative" and "liberal", because those two words have been so derived of content over the last couple of decades. Hardly anyone knows what those words mean nowadays. What I have learned in life, coming from a low income neighborhood and going on to complete my degree, is that the dollar has brought racism to our world. Amongst many other things such as war, incarceration, and murder. +alvisc2002, I truly wish that you, and others would see it that way. However, I understand that we all come from different backgrounds, and that the current system has actually worked well for some of us. The fact that you use the words "conservative" and "liberal" leads me to believe that you will not make the connection between money and racism. So, rather than try to convince you, I'll ask you a simple question. Can you please define the terms "overt conservative racism", and "covert liberal racism"? I did not know there was such a thing.
+Milo He definitely wasn't saying that "black english" (African American Vernacular English) is improper... He was saying the complete opposite. So I don't get how you think that he's being covertly racist.
+Miss E I agree with you. His message was that language is ever changing and that if a word or phrase is accepted and understood we might alter what we deem appropriate. However, not all black people say "he be workin". Additionally, I had nothing to say on the topic of overt/covert racism until our buddy +alvisc2002 starting making up terms(overt conservative racism, and covert liberal racism). +Miss E, here's the thing. Covert racism is so subtle that you hardly recognize it when it happens. That's why it is referred to as covert. Covertly, Mr. Pinker, associates the phrase "he be workin" with the African American community. When in fact, not every member uses this phrase, and people of other ethnicities(including white) use this phrase. That can be interpreted as covert racism, but I'm positive that this was not his intention. Again, +Miss E, I had nothing to say on the subject of overt/covert racism until I read the ridiculous phrases "overt conservative racism" and "covert liberal racism". I am in agreement with you. The reason why I commented "exactly" is because I asked +alvisc2002 to define those phrases for me and he/she didn't. I wonder how long we will continue this dialogue.
Agreed. I wish I had access to the numerous thought provoking online lectures during my school years. Albeit the double edge sword for the new generations though, with infinite knowledge comes infinite distractions. Unfortunately human nature (especially children) is like electricity, it prefers the path of least resistance to the "perceived" reward.
72daystar as someone who also had premature gray thrust upon them...our skin colour had remained the same. lol they didn't use HD makeup foundation on him. this is the result.
He's just capitalizing on the "aging supper successful rock star" image. If you look at later lectures, he gets rid of the tent-sized Blazer and enormous shoulder pads. Now, he looks really hip! That's called aging gracefully.
8:08 Language is not the same as thought. Many people report that they think in "language", but cognitive psychologists have shown that there are many kinds of thought that don't actually take place in the form of sentences. For example, we know from ingenious experiments that non linguistic creatures, such as babies before they've learned to speak, or other kinds of animals, have sophisticated kinds of cognition. They register cause and effect, and objects, and the intentions of other people, all without the benefit of speech. We also know that even in people that do have speech, namely adults, a lot of thinking goes on in forms other than language.... even when you understand language, what you come away with ts not in itself the actual language that you hear. Another important finding in cognitive psychology is that long term memory for verbal material records the just or the meaning or the content of the words rather than the exact form of the words. (An echo of the meaning, rather than the structure itself)... In fact even when it comes to understanding a sentence, the actual words are the tip of a vast iceberg of very rapid unconscious non-linguistic processing that's necessary even to make sense of the language itself.
@@zapdos3369 except when a representation of those “thoughts” which you may also be mistaking for “feelings”, are more accurately conveyed/communicated by that which transcends language: art!!
@Naphtaly Ramotedi how would you explain his examples though? eg., do you not mentally rotating the visual geometric shape, absent “words/language” to ascertain whether or not they are the same?
For sure this video can be recommended for everyone who only want to start learning english, cause this professor describes everything clearly, without using any hard constructions, which can usually confuse.
That was quite wonderful ! I believe that the concepts exist within the mind, first, and then we have to look for around for what-is-the-word, that other people use, to describe that concept.
Thank you, "Big Think" for sharing that here on your channel ---- and thank you most especially, Professor Steven Pinker. That was a most interesting, well thought and delivered presentation on language: its value to us all to communicate, and a means to help us understand the workings of the human brain. :)
"The sounds a guy makes when he exhales" Apparently Pinker has not yet discovered inward singing, the greatest tool in singing technology since yodeling, dude.
This excellent lecture reminds me of what an incredibly difficult challenge it is to produce AI capable of understanding language and using it at the level humans do.
This is straight up 75% of what an intro ling course will teach you at a four year university, same examples and everything, but in the time of one lecture and spoken by an authority in the field
look who's going to back to this video again and again and again? that's me. I loved it! honestly, it was fruitful more than the linguistic course I had in my university -.- everything that I couldn't understand professor Pinker said it in a simple and comprehensive way.
Love these sort of videos. Wittgenstein, "Philosophy is the misunderstanding of language." Language is an abstraction of reality based on a set of objective rules which can be subjectively influenced, the conscious mind is an abstraction of reality, essentially a language. Life as we know it is a language. Various life forms have various languages, which is why Wittgenstein stated in so many words even if an animal could speak you wouldn't be able to understand it. I know I'm just beating a dead horse stating this, but stating it helps me organize my thoughts and it might help someone else. Anyone care to argue with my idea helps me broaden my intellectual horizon.
+AtenAkaAton1 - True that when the horse tells you it’s about to die, you won’t understand it. Wittgenstein, credited alternately with being the smartest person who ever lived and with being a verbose fool who couldn’t render a simple idea understandable to anyone else, has basically told us that any logic-like sequence of events can be called a language, especially if produced by a conscious agent. Given that most people entertain a silent, continuous verbal monologue, which occupies much of the waking day in remarks about what’s going on or rehearsal of what is planned, we can say that we do think using language. Yet difficult mental computations, such as determining the optimum route to your mother’s house, or noting that her daffodils are yellow, can be done non-verbally as Pinker claims. Thoughts concerning distant or future items are probably within reach of dogs, who after all follow a trail for miles apparently knowing what they expect to find at the end. But language gives people more opportunity to discuss the content of these thoughts in detail with other people; or to analyze their logical implications much further than otherwise possible. For dogs any complex thought remains much a private affair, nor do we consider Snoopy a promising student for Pinker’s next class.
Well, looks like my three years of linguistics in University just went down the drain. I love this video! It’s literally a nutshell of a whole degree 😆
Esta conferencia es una genialidad... Me ha dado la vuelta a años de reflexiones e intuiciones sobre el lenguaje, la inteligencia y las facultades humanas...
The analytic philosophers laid great emphasis on language analysis. The analysis of language reveals the logical structure of thought which has its traces in the factual environment of the individual.
Prof.Steven P is the best professor that I have ever seen; he truly deserves to be called " the scientist of linguists" He is articulate and an eloquent speaker🌷
As a Master student in Linguistics myself, though I have had lectures on the same topics already, I am just so much in love still with his talk and how beautiful linguistics is. Ps: I love the way he titles Noam Chomsky as the Grand-Daddy of Modern Linguistics. 🤗😂 So true.
I used to study The Great Cources, In average they had about 30 lectures per course. This style of teaching, a whole subject within a lecture feels dense but time saving!
To boldly go where "I can't get no" Be so boldly spoken Where "wet hair, lather, rinse, repeat" Is followed like some record broken. Where men shout "duck" We'll waddle and quack and other antics For colourless green ideas sleep furiously When we play with our semantics. Or is that syntax? Man bites dog? I told him it was sunny outside But Guinness noted that Faulkner wrote Dot dot dot (could be a long ride). Shall we discuss sex with Doctor Ruth? Sounds a bit like it's "all gone sticky" One wug, two wugs, tall wugs both? Playing with grammer, that's the tricki Est thing to - in any tongue - do, Even if grammar rules should be innate. (Though retroflex /dʒ/ is quite tricky too) This is a nightmare for Google translate.
+differous01 - But if "Den Mann beisst der Hund," no confusing the danger of dogs to postal workers for an exceptional reversal, as German hath case grammar. And it confoundeth not Google this occasion, as "den" be unambiguous in pointing out the accuser.
Verner Hornung Google translated the written English words in their context (subject + verb + object) to deduce where the subject/object indicators should go in the target language. What it cannot do is put the written words into the context of words spoken in the video. The significance of 'man eats dog', and of my poem as a whole, is lost to me wot wrote it (unless I replay the video, and even then, having reduced Pinker's lessons to non-sequiturs, it's still non-sense).
differous01 - I hope Google is aware German isn't always subject + verb + object, but verb second (or sometimes last) regardless of where the subject appears, and if there's an auxiliary, it often goes last instead of in front of the verb. Hence "Die Boote muessen gestoppt werden," literally "the boats must bestopped will," where we just say "the boats must be stopped." But I agree Google will certainly wolf down your poem if you try to get a Russian out of it.
Verner Hornung so everyone and yourselves is based itself you original language is German mine is english. How will ever learn if I were died . obstante are the ones unwilling routine to doe then pick other languages it phychology and mixed rationality that in mathematics robot would doe what closer to perfection?
clichuin xethyoinun - Admittedly I'm biased. If I were an ancient Egyptian, I'd run around in a white linen kilt with no shirt on and prefer words spelled with reed-leaf and bird signs.
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
Want to get Smarter, Faster™?
Subscribe for DAILY videos: bigth.ink/SmarterFaster
The "Spanish (Latin America)" subtitles are in English for the last 6 minutes
thank you 🙏🙏🙏
Please get rid of the special effects, they are really distracting
@@maximilianbatz2070 THANK YOU!!!! How bloody ironic is it that he talks about our ability to distinguish sounds while there's this incessant dog-training click going on in the background...
@@granmadave great content. Superbly annoying sound effects
It is also a miracle that I'm able to watch such a well designed lecture by a renowned professor liguistics on the internet FOR FREE! It's a great time to be alive.
I know, right?!
I wish all education system was on the internet for free! Paid by sponsors and such. An online, free enrollment with a schedule for who ever wants. Free books, access to everything free.. It is in the corner i guess. I can see that future.
It's also a miracle that Bill Mahr is giving away the solutions to all our problems for FREE!
I agree. The internet used for good!
Too bad Trump is president :/
I majored in linguistics and although Dr. Pinker is not a pure linguist, he gives one of the best and most accessible descriptions of a brief overview of linguistics. Truly an amazing subject and it is such a disappointment that there are no linguistics classes in any high school in the world pretty much. A class in linguistics, even just a class in syntax, would help so many more people be able to learn new languages quickly and efficiently. Not just that, but more people would have a deep understanding of themselves and others.
What do you mean by saying pure linguist?
@@labelrouge9891 His specialty is not in Linguistics, it’s in Psycholinguistics. He focuses more on the mechanics and anatomy of the brain with regard to language as a faculty of the human experience and also how psychology affects and is affected by language. Basically, to put it in laymen’s terms, his expertise is not strictly within phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, or pragmatics but rather how any or all of each of those presents in the brain and psychology of a native speaker of any given language. Pragmatics would most closely align with his field and of course he has great understanding of each topic, more so than the lay person, but it is my understanding that none of those core foundational aspects of the field of linguistics are his specialty. Someone like Noam, on the other hand…pure linguist. Dude pioneered X-bar theory in syntax and has done several other works on groundbreaking stuff in modern linguistics. He’s a bit crazy, but a great linguist.
Such a great idea
@@labelrouge9891Dr. Pinker said it in the video
he said he is more like a Cognitive Scientist rather than Linguist
@@labelrouge9891Dr. Pinker was Psychologist before he got involved in linguistics field
This lecture can never get old, this man is a king; I love how he express in detail and clearly.
I love it too, but I hope that some ideas will have progressed in 20 years. Anyway, this thinker will remain precious and always interesting to study, even in 20 years and even if he may have been wrong in places.
Yeah, king of being friends with Epstein
there's something very pleasant in hearing Mr. Steven Pinker saying "he be workin"
I feel exactly the same as you
Wait until he talks about sex with Dr. Ruth
I loved it!!!
@D Kahn Please consider that some of your assumptions might be wrong
Dottore.
I love how clearly this man thinks. Its clarity layed gently onto silence. Like listening to a pure chime from one of those Tibetan buddhist singning bowls.
the sign of true intelligence- the abilityto break ideas and concepts to their simplest forms. Einstein was the best, imho
The sign of creative intelligence (inherent in the author of this comment @helimax):
The ability to absorb specific concretized information, extrapolate upon it, integrate the latter with the former, resulting in the formation of an opinion, to then correlate it abstractively with sound, as a means to express that which is otherwise ineffable, yet is understood, PRECISELY THROUGH said abstraction.
Ahh, the magic of art!!
Well done!
he clearly was not thinking very much when he went on epstien's plane over and over again
That is an excellent definition of art. The abstract idea or feeling you once felt or always thought ineffable, until it mysteriously arises from the page/canvass/screen like a long lost friend. @@AndImOkayWithIt
I can't appreciate enough how well structured this video is. It's so easy to understand concepts and connections among them.
Professor Pinker just made the entire history of linguistics seem like a 101 class. Nicely done.
fullyawakened any he’s probably better than any of professor on this topic in his delivery
Philology has entered the Chat
@@Morghast gotta bring back panini like nhk interview program about edo mathematics
What six minutes and he did not address the subject matter! You poor deluded fools, you just want to thank people society identity famous without thought. What's in your head Zombie? Stooges maybe
well I listened to the stream of noises Pinker made and i found them quite agreeable, so I thought I'd make some odd black marks in this box.
lool
If you break down language and written language like that it really does fuck with your mind
@Neal Murfitt Your screen marks are noted.
In looking at your random assemblage of black marks in the box, it caused me to spew out random comical noises in agreement.
Sadly the marks are not black on white but white on black. Oh the humanity!
This professor is really creative and productive to his presentation. He has a deep understanding on how language exists. I am amazed and inspired.
I absolutely love the way Steven explains things in his lectures. He doesn't over express words that don't need to be to show his intelligence. Profess Pinker is a brilliant man and awesome teacher.
1:21 1:21
An essential trait of mastering your craft is being able to teach the vastness of its content, with all its intrinsic and numerous permutations and exceptions, in simple language to the layman or apprentice. It shows a deep level of knowledge synthesis and understanding in that discipline. Someone who has not mastered their craft are not intrinsically good teachers - at least for STEM careers. I have noticed an easy "tell" (poker) is when a student asks them an unusual or lateral but valid question and they either brush it off like a politician would "I'll answer questions at the end of the lecture" (when the asker has conveniently forgotten it or now just wants to go home) or over-simplifying/altering the proposed question to make it easier to answer. Hence the term "master and apprentice". Masters by definition must always be able to effectively teach.
30 mins in and I'm just wondering if he's ever going to stand behind the podium
Haha. And the remote control he's holding changed from a black one to an Apple TV remote controller. Maybe they had some technical issues and he bought a MacBook with him haha
Oh, he switched remote again... hmm... odd.
Haha. Don't Be Too much.🤣. But He is so good tho. Very clear explanation.😭
Ahahahahah damn, you made my day
Not likely Miss Moneypenny, me thinks it (podium) be only a theatrical prop, for this fillum.
As a translator and language enthusiast I found this VERY fascinating! So glad I found this video!
Learned more from this video than all of semester lectures...
iphoneusdsd where did you study?
Everest college
Damn really? I learned pretty much all of this in a single semester 100 level intro linguistics course at my local community college.
When I watch something like this, it kills me.
I was taught in a, 'just learn it' environment.
Not in an, exploratory arena.
This vid (Imo) is a fantastic example of how we should learn.
u got fb?
100 percent! Engagement is the key to learning. Picking up a textbook can be pretty intimidating for some people, but videos like these have the ability to spark a level of understanding which leads people (like me) to explore a topic in much more detail.
Most of us, including me, don’t value enough the fact that so much information is shared on the internet for free! I just watch them for entertainment without realising how much I’ve actually learnt, and how much more I could have learnt with a more educational mindset. Thank you!
We live in a great age, Big Think and free and quick exchange of information is just amazing. To have,in this instance, 30 years of (basic) knowledge of linguistics summarized in an hour long video, truly spectacular. :) You have my thanks.
This is excellent. Structural linguistics is my favourite subject. I will be going back over this while taking notes to fill in the many blanks I am discovering. This video will influence future book purchases.
Pinker is a great explainer. He comes up with fantastic examples for all his key but perhaps counterintuitive ideas and points. Love it.
I want to be this man when I grow up.
I pretend he is Lenard Hofstadter while he talks :b
The dumbing down of America has been completed. In a few short weeks, the morons will be running the country and anyone deemed to be "too smart" will be subject to ridicule and/or physical harm, just like back in sixth grade. Instead of trolling comments on instructive videos that are beyond your intellectual abilities, Kevin, why don't you just apply to be Trump's Secretary of State?
u can't . It is not something to be acquired! . it's a Gift
TopHatKi
start growing out your hair now
Maravillosa síntesis de la teoría lingüística! El ejemplo del bebé es muy bueno. Un niño que solo balbucea puede indicar con el dedo algo que quiere, emitir un sonido que aún no es lengua y expresar un deseo, antes de ser capaz de usar una oración completa y con sentido: un tipo de pensamiento, que ya discrimina la realidad, pero no en palabras. Muy buen video. Que suerte tienen algunos de ustedes que lo tuvieron de profesor
I have been fascinated by language and how we speak for a long time. I love studying other languages to see the difference in rules of grammar as well as words. I have studied Mandarin for years and have become aware of a vastly different way of expression with different grammatical rules. Even French and Italian, though more closely related to English, have their own uniqueness.
Very interesting session sir.
What I find fascinating regarding linguistics as a computer programmer is how we can use assembly mnemonics and the language syntax to control the flow of electricity in a computers components. Here we find that language has mathematical properties.
This was truly awesome. It flows. Very well constructed. My first language is Portugese but I could understant everything and relate to the content. Beautiful. I'll watch it again in the future. The more I learn, the more I can teach. Thank you so much.
I speak, write, and read three languages. I used to teach ESL. Thank you very much. Your video helped me a lot with my teachings.
The probability of "green ideas" being uttered has increased greatly since "Green" became associated with environmentalism and specific political philosophies.
Agreed
And a lot of those ideas can be figuratively colorless. Ha ha
Andrew Marvell - The Garden - Annihilating all that's made, To a Green Thought in a Green Shade
Thanks for noticing & noting that......It may not be the flesh of his meaning, rather the spirit....
Which proves one of his points beautifully, that language is a constantly developing thing.
I got assigned to watch this video as a project in school, but i'm finding it genuinly interesting! Narration was clear and efficient. Good stuff👍
Steven Pinker: "I'm actually not a linguist"
Description: "Steven Pinker, renowned linguist..."
Channel administrator:Hey you wouldn't believe what we do for click bait
It's a bit fuzzy because Pinker originally studied Psychology but in recent years/decades, he has almost exclusively worked in the field of linguistics. I have myself studied linguistics and we were given several texts by Pinker to read. So, he doesn't just do this as a hobby, he actually researches and publishes academic papers in the field of linguistics.
Agreed with rainbow
cognitive psychology is a branch of linguistics
and that illustrates how language works. (actually not = a kind of; in this case, a person with a different diploma) Now, stop thinking about elephants!
one of the most fascinating lectures I have heard in my entire life, I thank you
I have myself a Bachelor's and a Master's degree in linguistics and still I have very much enjoyed this lecture. It neatly summarizes what I have learned over the course of many years.
However, as a non-native English speaker, there is one feature that I must admit still isn't entirely clear to me. Namely, it is that of "he be workin'" in AAVE. Professor Pinker notes that this feature is unique to AAVE and that it means something like: "he's got a job" (as opposed to "he's working right now, in this moment"). I also learned about this during my undergrad studies and was told by my professors that it is "unique to AAVE".
However, from what I can tell, the meaning of "he's got a job" also exists in General American English or RP in the form of the simple present "he works". So, apparently the sentence: "he be workin' at a hospital" (AAVE) is different from "he works at a hospital" (RP). However, I can't quite understand where the difference lies. They seem to express the same idea, yet I'm told the former means something different because it contains a grammatical feature that only exists in AAVE.
I'm sure some of the fine folks in this comment section can unravel this mystery for me :).
In AAVE, the “habitual be” emphasizes that an action is habitual or recurring. So it would be more accurate to say “He be working” means that he has been working on a regular basis (and still is). Then, by implication, since he works regularly, he likely has a job.
He expresses himself very well... It feels pleasurable to hear him speak.
Such an insightful lecture. I am very grateful and thankful for having Prof. Pinker in RUclips.
An amazing era to enjoy the enlightenment from a great mind.
This video inspired me to learn more about linguistics.
Informative
Videos like this help me to stay focused on transferring into MIT and getting my linguistics degree there
I'm speechless.Amazing work and such a great proffessor . Thank you so much for!
If you wanna know more about languages, logic, and interesting facts & trivia about language etc, I recommend NativLang on youtube.
Very high quality videos, but for some reason the videos gets a very very low view count. He also got an interesting playlist about the construction of human language.
thanx for this recommandation, the channel looks promising!
I also recommend LangFocus. I love that channcel. I also love NativLang, I've been subscribed there for a while now.
Thanks. I'll check that out.
He also got???
This is the most thorough discussion of the subject of language I have ever heard/read. Amazing!
You are already legendary. You discussed with Fodor and Chomsky and demonstrated that human people have the necessity of speaking, like socializing
Excellent, thank you, Steven Pinker! At 71, it's nice to pick up on a subject that interests me very much, but never studied. Interesting how this instantly available, free, attractive and beautifully organized lecture is so satisfying. And I can save it and watch again. I've ordered one of your books and will enjoy it more being able to visualize you speaking.
Very good explanation of language from the perspective of cognitive science. I'm picking cognitive linguistics as my future study goal. Thank you Prof. Pinker.
I appreciate how the video description says reknowned linguist and at the top of the video the dr says " now im not a linguist". 😄😄😄
Wow, what a fascinating lecture! Pinker is an amazing intellect! Last year I read a great book of his called The Better Angels of Our Nature, in which he very convincingly argues that human society has been steadily improving throughout our history, contrary to what many people believe. I'd love to delve further into his work! Thanks for sharing this video.
Oh! If you had the time, and wouldn't mind, what's the one paragraph from that book that would leave me curious enough to buy it myself
? :3 (Thank you, I hope. Lol)
@@janebanedoe9917 This is what caused me to buy it: I read from reviews that he proposed a theory of constant human progress to increasing nonviolence. I wondered how he fit the first half of the twentieth century, with its two world wars, the Holocaust, the Armenian Genocide, the slaughter involved in the partition of India, etc. into his scheme. He managed to do it, but I still wonder what it would have taken to make him question his thesis.
I'm a computer scientist student and after watching this I'm going to study linguistics more. As it has more of an impact on my work than I've been lead to believe in my classes.
My god, an amazing lecture that is filled with horribly distracting sound design and graphics.
If pinker and doctor sapolsky meet at a bar...what would they talk about?..imagine how much knowledge those professors have...it would be one of the most interesting chats two human beings may have
vbgthashit amazing lol also conversation between Chomsky and pinker are great. Podcast of sapolsky nd Sam Harris was amazing
He be workin!
+Milo I think Pinker makes a powerful statement about overt conservative racism vs covert liberal racism here.
by his definition of ebonics and how it is the cultural norm of black society he shows us that covert racism is more acceptable.
and that socially engineering a culture to kill itself is more accepted than killing that culture directly.
also by criticizing covert racism, you as an individual can be marginalized as a racist. or in the case that you're black, marginalized and ostracized as an "uncle tom"
note how he uses linguistics to link "ebonics" to "african americans"
+alvisc2002
Okay, let me begin by saying that I earned a bachelor's degree in Sociology from San Diego State University. I am extremely familiar with overt/covert racism and I always love a good race conversation.
So, I made that comment, not to criticize covert racism, but rather, to highlight how funny and awkward Mr. Pinker sounds. Simple humor, nothing more(I understand that this is hard to interpret via the comment section on RUclips).
Now, for the more important issue at hand, what in the WORLD are you talking about?
Could Mr. Pinker's comments be considered as covert racism? Absolutely. Associating bad grammar and spelling with a certain ethnic group, with such normality, is definitely along those lines.
Merriam-Webster defines racism as:
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/racism
I personally prefer the second definition, as I feel it is more accurate.
Racism is racism. It can be overt and it can be covert. It is a negative ideal that has greatly affected the world around us. I chuckle when others use the words "conservative" and "liberal", because those two words have been so derived of content over the last couple of decades. Hardly anyone knows what those words mean nowadays.
What I have learned in life, coming from a low income neighborhood and going on to complete my degree, is that the dollar has brought racism to our world. Amongst many other things such as war, incarceration, and murder.
+alvisc2002, I truly wish that you, and others would see it that way. However, I understand that we all come from different backgrounds, and that the current system has actually worked well for some of us. The fact that you use the words "conservative" and "liberal" leads me to believe that you will not make the connection between money and racism.
So, rather than try to convince you, I'll ask you a simple question. Can you please define the terms "overt conservative racism", and "covert liberal racism"?
I did not know there was such a thing.
Exactly!
+Milo He definitely wasn't saying that "black english" (African American Vernacular English) is improper... He was saying the complete opposite. So I don't get how you think that he's being covertly racist.
+Miss E
I agree with you. His message was that language is ever changing and that if a word or phrase is accepted and understood we might alter what we deem appropriate.
However, not all black people say "he be workin".
Additionally, I had nothing to say on the topic of overt/covert racism until our buddy +alvisc2002 starting making up terms(overt conservative racism, and covert liberal racism).
+Miss E, here's the thing. Covert racism is so subtle that you hardly recognize it when it happens. That's why it is referred to as covert.
Covertly, Mr. Pinker, associates the phrase "he be workin" with the African American community. When in fact, not every member uses this phrase, and people of other ethnicities(including white) use this phrase. That can be interpreted as covert racism, but I'm positive that this was not his intention.
Again, +Miss E, I had nothing to say on the subject of overt/covert racism until I read the ridiculous phrases "overt conservative racism" and "covert liberal racism".
I am in agreement with you.
The reason why I commented "exactly" is because I asked +alvisc2002 to define those phrases for me and he/she didn't.
I wonder how long we will continue this dialogue.
I love listening Mr Pinker.
Always seems so evident and even when I do not agree I find reasons to reflect on my previous beliefs
Absolutely wonderful and enriching! Greetings from Costa Rica!
In 11 years of school I hadn't had a class as informative as this.
Agreed. I wish I had access to the numerous thought provoking online lectures during my school years. Albeit the double edge sword for the new generations though, with infinite knowledge comes infinite distractions. Unfortunately human nature (especially children) is like electricity, it prefers the path of least resistance to the "perceived" reward.
its beautiful to heard this professor talking aboit linguistics.
Plus 1 million views, *recovers faith in humanity*
Gratitude to the team, included Mr. Pinker, for the production and sharing of this amazing lecture.
I studied linguistics back in the eighties before moving into political science and economics. I loved this lecture.
The makeup artist appears to have worked in Opera previously.
72daystar as someone who also had premature gray thrust upon them...our skin colour had remained the same. lol they didn't use HD makeup foundation on him. this is the result.
72daystar It's actually the lighting. It's too blue and needs to be warmed up with some yellow, orange or red.
Yatty Yat ayllw
ha thanks for pointing that out - hilarious
He's just capitalizing on the "aging supper successful rock star" image. If you look at later lectures, he gets rid of the tent-sized Blazer and enormous shoulder pads. Now, he looks really hip! That's called aging gracefully.
What a fascinating lecture, i was riveted to the screen. Thank you for making this video available to us all.
What is a Fascinating lecture
This is the best, the most comprehensive and the most effective summary on"language" available over the internet!
8:08 Language is not the same as thought. Many people report that they think in "language", but cognitive psychologists have shown that there are many kinds of thought that don't actually take place in the form of sentences. For example, we know from ingenious experiments that non linguistic creatures, such as babies before they've learned to speak, or other kinds of animals, have sophisticated kinds of cognition. They register cause and effect, and objects, and the intentions of other people, all without the benefit of speech. We also know that even in people that do have speech, namely adults, a lot of thinking goes on in forms other than language.... even when you understand language, what you come away with ts not in itself the actual language that you hear. Another important finding in cognitive psychology is that long term memory for verbal material records the just or the meaning or the content of the words rather than the exact form of the words. (An echo of the meaning, rather than the structure itself)... In fact even when it comes to understanding a sentence, the actual words are the tip of a vast iceberg of very rapid unconscious non-linguistic processing that's necessary even to make sense of the language itself.
+Joe Carter I 'heart' Joe. ^^.
Language is the bridge between all types of thought though. When you want to describe those other thoughts you use..language
@@zapdos3369 except when a representation of those “thoughts” which you may also be mistaking for “feelings”, are more accurately conveyed/communicated by that which transcends language: art!!
@Naphtaly Ramotedi how would you explain his examples though? eg., do you not mentally rotating the visual geometric shape, absent “words/language” to ascertain whether or not they are the same?
@@AndImOkayWithIt it actually just transcends verbal communication but is still communication and therefore language.
the sound designer went all in for this video :D
For sure this video can be recommended for everyone who only want to start learning english, cause this professor describes everything clearly, without using any hard constructions, which can usually confuse.
That was quite wonderful ! I believe that the concepts exist within the mind, first, and then we have to look for around for what-is-the-word, that other people use, to describe that concept.
Thank you, "Big Think" for sharing that here on your channel ---- and thank you most especially, Professor Steven Pinker. That was a most interesting, well thought and delivered presentation on language: its value to us all to communicate, and a means to help us understand the workings of the human brain. :)
love his unintentional neologism "stounds" at 4:32 combining 'stands' with 'sounds'
"The sounds a guy makes when he exhales"
Apparently Pinker has not yet discovered inward singing, the greatest tool in singing technology since yodeling, dude.
other cognitive scientists are only speaking half the time! The other half of the time they're breathing...in!
@@zksurvivor ..but not anymore baby!
This excellent lecture reminds me of what an incredibly difficult challenge it is to produce AI capable of understanding language and using it at the level humans do.
This gentleman speaks very well,easy to understand and makes me want to learn more.
This is straight up 75% of what an intro ling course will teach you at a four year university, same examples and everything, but in the time of one lecture and spoken by an authority in the field
True privilege to be taught by Steven Pinker!
excellent presentation of the topic
Steven Pinker u are the man
Mukoro Oweh, Jr. He be workin dem linguistics
Brilliant. Your book, The Language Instinct, changed my perception. I cite your ideas often. :)
Do you think it is still relevant today?
Thank you sir! I am not sure if it is just me but I find this man' s voice very very pleasing to hear. He is so good at explaining. Thank you again
What an awesome lecture!
If clear thinking, careful enunciation and delivery solves basic existential problems, this guy reigns supreme.
I'd call language the most successful meme.
look who's going to back to this video again and again and again? that's me. I loved it! honestly, it was fruitful more than the linguistic course I had in my university -.- everything that I couldn't understand professor Pinker said it in a simple and comprehensive way.
If only my linguistics professor at university had shown us this... I would have considered linguistics much more interesting right away!
I love the examples at 11:45 - "What's up in the hizzy?"
Master Pinker has a beautiful intellect and nature…, I have to watch this over n over
Excelente palestra, Sr. Pinker! Muito obrigada!
Love these sort of videos. Wittgenstein, "Philosophy is the misunderstanding of language." Language is an abstraction of reality based on a set of objective rules which can be subjectively influenced, the conscious mind is an abstraction of reality, essentially a language. Life as we know it is a language. Various life forms have various languages, which is why Wittgenstein stated in so many words even if an animal could speak you wouldn't be able to understand it. I know I'm just beating a dead horse stating this, but stating it helps me organize my thoughts and it might help someone else. Anyone care to argue with my idea helps me broaden my intellectual horizon.
+AtenAkaAton1 - True that when the horse tells you it’s about to die, you won’t understand it. Wittgenstein, credited alternately with being the smartest person who ever lived and with being a verbose fool who couldn’t render a simple idea understandable to anyone else, has basically told us that any logic-like sequence of events can be called a language, especially if produced by a conscious agent. Given that most people entertain a silent, continuous verbal monologue, which occupies much of the waking day in remarks about what’s going on or rehearsal of what is planned, we can say that we do think using language.
Yet difficult mental computations, such as determining the optimum route to your mother’s house, or noting that her daffodils are yellow, can be done non-verbally as Pinker claims. Thoughts concerning distant or future items are probably within reach of dogs, who after all follow a trail for miles apparently knowing what they expect to find at the end. But language gives people more opportunity to discuss the content of these thoughts in detail with other people; or to analyze their logical implications much further than otherwise possible. For dogs any complex thought remains much a private affair, nor do we consider Snoopy a promising student for Pinker’s next class.
Nice. Thank you
I love the way he explains things.
Well, looks like my three years of linguistics in University just went down the drain. I love this video! It’s literally a nutshell of a whole degree 😆
“Real eyes realize real lies.”
- 2pac!
Esta conferencia es una genialidad... Me ha dado la vuelta a años de reflexiones e intuiciones sobre el lenguaje, la inteligencia y las facultades humanas...
7:50 he be workin, LOL!
This dude is a genius. This could also explain how intuition works. The same way language works.
THANKS
FOR
BEING
PRESENT
AS
PRESENT
HEART FELT
❣❣❣❣❣❣❣❣❣
"Look at what you'll be doing for the next hour" Oh crap, I thought this video said 5 minutes. To late now.
At 8:00 wouldn't the standard English counterparts be " he works" and "he is working" ?
I think "he works" is ambiguous. It does not necessarily convey a regular and repeated action, although we often use it to mean that.
The analytic philosophers laid great emphasis on language analysis. The analysis of language reveals the logical structure of thought which has its traces in the factual environment of the individual.
This was really good
He looks genius heheh... I adore him and I subscribed! He is brilliant! :) We need humans like him, very useful in the community.
Prof.Steven P is the best professor that I have ever seen; he truly deserves to be called " the scientist of linguists"
He is articulate and an eloquent speaker🌷
As a Master student in Linguistics myself, though I have had lectures on the same topics already, I am just so much in love still with his talk and how beautiful linguistics is. Ps: I love the way he titles Noam Chomsky as the Grand-Daddy of Modern Linguistics. 🤗😂 So true.
And he was using slang too.
Language, its happening as we speak.
:) Touché
I used to study The Great Cources, In average they had about 30 lectures per course. This style of teaching, a whole subject within a lecture feels dense but time saving!
Fascinating. Don't start watching unless you have 50 minutes to spare!
I won't soon look at voice recognition software with disdain.
Everything that Steve Pinker has written is truly excellent. Get any of his books and you will be both pleased and educated.
In a parallel universe this is Steven Tyler!
. . . and Steven has humongous sex with Dr Ruth there . Nice universe , that one :)
To boldly go where "I can't get no"
Be so boldly spoken
Where "wet hair, lather, rinse, repeat"
Is followed like some record broken.
Where men shout "duck"
We'll waddle and quack and other antics
For colourless green ideas sleep furiously
When we play with our semantics.
Or is that syntax? Man bites dog?
I told him it was sunny outside
But Guinness noted that Faulkner wrote
Dot dot dot (could be a long ride).
Shall we discuss sex with Doctor Ruth?
Sounds a bit like it's "all gone sticky"
One wug, two wugs, tall wugs both?
Playing with grammer, that's the tricki
Est thing to - in any tongue - do,
Even if grammar rules should be innate.
(Though retroflex /dʒ/ is quite tricky too)
This is a nightmare for Google translate.
+differous01 - But if "Den Mann beisst der Hund," no confusing the danger of dogs to postal workers for an exceptional reversal, as German hath case grammar. And it confoundeth not Google this occasion, as "den" be unambiguous in pointing out the accuser.
Verner Hornung Google translated the written English words in their context (subject + verb + object) to deduce where the subject/object indicators should go in the target language.
What it cannot do is put the written words into the context of words spoken in the video. The significance of 'man eats dog', and of my poem as a whole, is lost to me wot wrote it
(unless I replay the video, and even then, having reduced Pinker's lessons to non-sequiturs, it's still non-sense).
differous01 - I hope Google is aware German isn't always subject + verb + object, but verb second (or sometimes last) regardless of where the subject appears, and if there's an auxiliary, it often goes last instead of in front of the verb. Hence "Die Boote muessen gestoppt werden," literally "the boats must bestopped will," where we just say "the boats must be stopped."
But I agree Google will certainly wolf down your poem if you try to get a Russian out of it.
Verner Hornung so everyone and yourselves is based itself you original language is German mine is english. How will ever learn if I were died . obstante are the ones unwilling routine to doe then pick other languages it phychology and mixed rationality that in mathematics robot would doe what closer to perfection?
clichuin xethyoinun - Admittedly I'm biased. If I were an ancient Egyptian, I'd run around in a white linen kilt with no shirt on and prefer words spelled with reed-leaf and bird signs.
This topic has been on my mind for the last few years.