Understanding Software Defined Networking with

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 дек 2024

Комментарии • 37

  • @whereistheline8964
    @whereistheline8964 4 месяца назад +7

    Thank you! Please Provide the Part 2. you explain it very well

    • @45Drives
      @45Drives  4 месяца назад +2

      Coming soon!

    • @jamesmaes5072
      @jamesmaes5072 Месяц назад +3

      @@45Drives Still coming soon?

  • @MarcoRotella
    @MarcoRotella 5 месяцев назад +9

    Yes, part 2 please, really interesting

    • @45Drives
      @45Drives  4 месяца назад

      Coming soon!

  • @thegoncaloalves
    @thegoncaloalves 19 дней назад +1

    Is part 2 still coming? We really need it guys!

  • @markx6288
    @markx6288 5 месяцев назад +11

    Software Defined Routing .. yes please!

  • @samsung99monitor6
    @samsung99monitor6 5 месяцев назад +10

    Part 2 please 😀

  • @techaddressed
    @techaddressed 4 месяца назад +2

    Looking forward to part 2.

    • @45Drives
      @45Drives  4 месяца назад

      Coming soon!

  • @DDD-d1g
    @DDD-d1g 5 месяцев назад +7

    10:22 Just noticed that 172.12.*.* is not a private IP range. Only 172.16+.*.* are in the private IP range. Meaning the after 172, the second octet needs to be 16 or greater.

    • @user-lg4le8xr4s
      @user-lg4le8xr4s 5 месяцев назад +1

      172.16.0.0/12. From 172.16.0.0 to 172.31.255.255

    • @mitcHELLOworld
      @mitcHELLOworld 5 месяцев назад

      You are right, but in practice this has absolutely no effect as it’s a fully NAT’d network. You can really use anything you want :) great catch though! If theres anything else you’d like to see in a follow up video, just let me know!

  • @demanuDJ
    @demanuDJ 5 месяцев назад +3

    I want to know a little more about OVS

  • @SergioScabuzzo
    @SergioScabuzzo 12 дней назад

    Great content! Is part two still on the docket? I've been eagerly waiting to see if I want to go this route (pun intended)

    • @45Drives
      @45Drives  11 дней назад

      Yes, part II is in the works!

  • @johnnyjohnny5786
    @johnnyjohnny5786 Месяц назад

    I'm new to Proxmox stuff so pls tell me - if I want to set up SDN on my node and my 'real' local network is 172.12.12.X (I mean in this network work all my computers / prinetrs etc.) then do I need to create subnet ( like here 10:50 ) 172.12.12.0/24 also?

    • @45Drives
      @45Drives  Месяц назад

      If you are only planning on having a single network that is bridged directly to your LAN, it really doesn't make sense to use SDN. You should just use the standard bridge tied directly to the physical network interface from your Proxmox VE server that connects back to your switching.
      SDN is beneficial if you have multiple VLANs you wish to create for different VMs/containers or if you want to create a NAT'd network that can get out to the internet but nothing can get in to the devices on it, etc.

  • @fbifido2
    @fbifido2 3 месяца назад

    @14:40 - why can't it show a drop-down list of all your current bridge?

  • @neoand_in2matrix
    @neoand_in2matrix 4 месяца назад +2

    Plz part 2 🎉

  • @killua_148
    @killua_148 День назад

    Remember that it won't work automatically if using Proxmox Firewall.
    This is because the dhcp request is blocked by the firewall. The official wiki page "Setup Simple Zone With SNAT and DHCP" shows how to solve the problem.

  • @fbifido2
    @fbifido2 3 месяца назад

    @15:42 - does this mean we can create VLAN in any ZONE ????
    - can we create VALN in Simple, VLAN, QinQ, VXLAN, EVPN Zones ????

  • @DDD-d1g
    @DDD-d1g 5 месяцев назад +3

    Can you please add the link to "45 home lab" channel in the description? I found it to be: www.youtube.com/@45HomeLab

  • @28469
    @28469 5 месяцев назад +5

    give us a tech tip on bench pressing, holy guns

    • @mitcHELLOworld
      @mitcHELLOworld 5 месяцев назад +1

      Haha appreciate it man. Have a cpl bench pressing videos on my channel under shorts actually 😅

    • @28469
      @28469 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@mitcHELLOworld 335 holy crap

    • @45Drives
      @45Drives  4 месяца назад +1

      We'll commence internal talks on this immediately! 😅💪

  • @yekyawhan
    @yekyawhan Месяц назад

    Part 2 please

  • @ZeronicMatrix
    @ZeronicMatrix 5 месяцев назад +1

    Trying to run Proxmox is really janky to be honest, when your using TrueNAS Scale for storage. iSCSI barely works and NFS seems to be the only solution but that is horrible slow, even with 10G and SATA SSDs.

    • @MarcoRotella
      @MarcoRotella 5 месяцев назад +3

      Been running on iscsi for the last four years with no problem whatsoever.. what problems did you face?

    • @toddratson7526
      @toddratson7526 5 месяцев назад

      I have been running Proxmox VE on 5 servers with TrueNAS Scale for storage for years now and it has been reliable and performant.

    • @floriantthebault521
      @floriantthebault521 5 месяцев назад

      Ah ah, I have that exact same problem witht he same setup. ISCSI barely works for me too. I can configure it, but only one node of the cluster sees the iscsi lun shares, the others ignores it whatever I do. It's infuriating.

    • @mitcHELLOworld
      @mitcHELLOworld 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@floriantthebault521sounds like you don’t have persistent reservations configured or setup properly.

    • @floriantthebault521
      @floriantthebault521 5 месяцев назад

      @@mitcHELLOworld Yeah, I found out where was the "problem". It's config and shitty documentation. TrueNas makes you declare your Zvol as extents... and then you had to manually declare those extents as Associated Targets... it was trial and error, but it's truly bad UI design and bad documentation.