It was an offshore turbine, built onshore to test technology. Its role was experimental, allowing the turbine supplier to test different aspects of generation, different mechanical and electrical settings, different modes... The turbine had planning consent for 5 years. It generated to the grid during that time, but also had long periods where it was subject to test and upgrade. Think of it as a Frankenstein Turbine. At the end of the 5 year period it had to be removed. As it was an experimental turbine it was unsuitable for use elsewhere, mainly due to the test which had been carried out and its scale, but also as it would be very hard to insure or get a warranty for.
I need some one from UK i need some informations
Why did the turbine get nocked down?
It was an offshore turbine, built onshore to test technology. Its role was experimental, allowing the turbine supplier to test different aspects of generation, different mechanical and electrical settings, different modes...
The turbine had planning consent for 5 years. It generated to the grid during that time, but also had long periods where it was subject to test and upgrade. Think of it as a Frankenstein Turbine.
At the end of the 5 year period it had to be removed.
As it was an experimental turbine it was unsuitable for use elsewhere, mainly due to the test which had been carried out and its scale, but also as it would be very hard to insure or get a warranty for.
What was wrong with it
It had collected all the subsidies it could.
0000
This is good
Oyh
💚 ♻️ 💪 ☀️