I've learned so much from your videos over the years Zoran. Your videos on Pluralsight were some of the primary sources of me beginning to really grasp design patterns. And I've enjoyed the way you teach, you make it exciting!
I have seen your plural courses also, to make code readable you make use of extension method extensively. If you could compile separate course/video to teach technique to improve readability that would be awesome. 5* for this video👍
if you need to sort by another property in a comparison when the result is 0, is there a way to avoid the reverse comparer to reverse this second property too? like i want to sort by type and then the name. The type should get reverse but not the name.
I only made static factory for it, because the factory is stateless. The decorator itself is an instance, especially because it is wrapping another instance which it decorates - it is a stateful object.
It is a general rule that methods that apply to instances are not thread safe by design. If thread safety is a requirement, then it is implemented as an orthogonal concern, either on the instance, or some other synchronization target.
Hey Zoran, I love your video and enthusiasm so much. But as a Kotlin dev this code repulses me, because in Kotlin those 18 lines would just be half a line in a functional programming style.
Become a patron and get access to source code and exclusive live streams: www.patreon.com/posts/this-decorator-81381504
I've learned so much from your videos over the years Zoran. Your videos on Pluralsight were some of the primary sources of me beginning to really grasp design patterns. And I've enjoyed the way you teach, you make it exciting!
We cannot thank you enough for the wonderful videos and explanations!
Great work Zoran , I loved the simplicity
I have seen your plural courses also, to make code readable you make use of extension method extensively.
If you could compile separate course/video to teach technique to improve readability that would be awesome.
5* for this video👍
Really smart code!
if you need to sort by another property in a comparison when the result is 0, is there a way to avoid the reverse comparer to reverse this second property too? like i want to sort by type and then the name. The type should get reverse but not the name.
This is very useful - thanks
Explain about prevent reverse 2x using decorator
have you considered practical f# libraries course? how to make f# libraries that can be used by c# front ends?
Not really, but only because there is not enough audience compared to my C# content. I find F# to be a great language.
Very energetic, thanks, i have a question
Does decorator have to be always static
I only made static factory for it, because the factory is stateless.
The decorator itself is an instance, especially because it is wrapping another instance which it decorates - it is a stateful object.
Thanks Zoran. Are you planning on making a follow up to your Object Oriented C# course on Udemy?
Yes, the next course is under way. It will take a few months to complete work before publication.
Has to watch this three times to catch the nuances.
Never seen an extension method made by a factory before.
Not thread safe ?
It is a general rule that methods that apply to instances are not thread safe by design.
If thread safety is a requirement, then it is implemented as an orthogonal concern, either on the instance, or some other synchronization target.
Great video Mr.Zoran. Would like to know if your functional c# course in plural sight or it's equivalent course is available in udemy
There will be no similar content published elsewhere, primarily due to copyright constraints.
Hey Zoran, I love your video and enthusiasm so much. But as a Kotlin dev this code repulses me, because in Kotlin those 18 lines would just be half a line in a functional programming style.