There is indeed a Saab that goes under 10s, yes. But it's modded for using an Audi 4WD drivetrain. And yes it uses a Saab 2 litre 16V turbo engine. Search for Gustav N Saab and you should find it.
Ari nurrkalas volvo 850 10,10 sec 650hp. This car last update: 402m: 9.60sek @ 250kmh 0-100kmh= 2.8sek 0-200kmh= 6.6sek 0-250kmh= 9.6sek 100-150kmh= ~1.8sek 100-200kmh= ~3.8sek 180-250kmh= 3.2sek More than twice faster than a lambo gallardo 550.
BA! a BMW is like Volkswagen is like Audi is like Opel. A Honda is like Toyota is like Nissan. A Saab is a SAAB never like another and always different. Dont forget Saab put much more into engine technology than any other company with the APC system and developing a turbo charged system for EVERYDAY USE. they stuck with 4 cylinder turbo engines when every one else went to a V6. So to me a Saab is a smart car just cuz its the only one who thought out side the box from day one with everything!:)
vtec is good really mostly with forced induction but they tend to blow up :/ but if you get a legit one which are hard to come by! then yea you can have a beast on your hands! i preffer awd dsm's no traction issues what so ever! :D
The reason hondas run faster with less hp is because they are much lighter in weight. Saabs have crumple zones and even stripped to nothing weigh 2400lbs. Hondas can easily run in the 1500lb range, its simple power to weight. This car ran 10.42 at 142mph. Saabs also make huge torque and will beat many cars on the road from a roll, its something that has to be experienced.
@Supersupra87 only a very few true tuner/race civics or acruas run that fast on a N/A setup. the only reason alot dont is because of the motors tendency to be weak (and people dont know what theyre doing) and dont like a whole lot of power but it can be done with the right engine like the b18 or k20 but after dumping enough money into it to buy a 11second car in the first place really. the stanard for civics in the USA are 18 seconds hahahaha X^D
+1 this. Saabs weren't design to handle. The chassis flexed like a noodle, and 60+% of the weight is in the front. Not to mention it's set up for comfort. but in the case of this car thats irrelevant
@@fortune300 well the b234r can take 800hp on stock internals! find me another 4 cyl that can do this, only gm can and did! this engine is insane ! it is the best 4 cyl ever made !
16~18sec for the granny non-vtec engine.. yes, lol... ~12sec K20 stock engine (hatchback). Putting a K20 in is not that difficult.... Is there any Saab that goes under 10sec 1/4mile ??? :-----) I dont hate saab, i just hate when they give it 6 of 5...... Maybe 6/5 compared to Saab cars only, then yes.
no, its not good for a front driven cars. examples of that is ford focus, honda integra etc. its way to much weight on the front wheels and it understeers. and for the record - i drive a bmw z4 2,5si.
Ha this car will out run a 850R ... one the 850 R weighs a ton! like its fuckin heavy! .. the 9-3 doesn't have alot of weight so its faster on the long haul. thats it. cuz its gonna need all its power to haul its self down the line and the 9-3 well Viggen anyway has a good sharp torque band and would gladly take on ur 850 R :P
The handling on a 9-3 SE is awful, I've owned one, if you think they handle well you're on crack. The handling on an integra type-r is very good by any cars standards, fwd or not. I'd imagine you'd struggle to keep up with one on the twisties with your z4
lol, Acceleration 6 of 5. Bullshit... The Civic type-r got 3 of 5, because of the fwd. Supra and skyline got 5 of 5.... this doesnt make any sense. "11.01 sec, try beating that with another FWD car" lol...... , 11sec is pretty much a standard with Honda civics in the USA. they are running 10sec and lower with 4cylinder NON TURBO engines. How many thumbs down do i get now ? xD
whoooaa that reminds me of the 2nd one with the cosy xD thats pretty unique man cant wait to see it in action
If I recall correctly, it is running the Quaife gearset... I could be wrong though!
I think the band that sings this is "Fake Moss"
i love the sound in the car XD sounds like a jet :p
i want thos head lights!!!!!
@Sunseeker888 Yeah right. GM wanted to break down Saab for "Opel"
There is indeed a Saab that goes under 10s, yes. But it's modded for using an Audi 4WD drivetrain. And yes it uses a Saab 2 litre 16V turbo engine. Search for Gustav N Saab and you should find it.
You are a Volvo driver who never drive a Saab.The handling is for a front driven car really good!
I like the escort cosworth wing
Its just different, most of us saab guys are just tired of the norm. Of course its not the optimal car, thats half the fun, personally.
Fake Moss does sing the song. The song is called Go West.
Ari nurrkalas volvo 850 10,10 sec 650hp.
This car last update:
402m: 9.60sek @ 250kmh
0-100kmh= 2.8sek
0-200kmh= 6.6sek
0-250kmh= 9.6sek
100-150kmh= ~1.8sek
100-200kmh= ~3.8sek
180-250kmh= 3.2sek
More than twice faster than a lambo gallardo 550.
does any one know what transmition is using in this car? pushing all that power to your front wheel requires top notch transmition setup
These guys should mod a saturn. like a FWD wagon sw2 or sc2
Saab power
does anybody know where i can get the spolier on that car????
BA! a BMW is like Volkswagen is like Audi is like Opel. A Honda is like Toyota is like Nissan. A Saab is a SAAB never like another and always different. Dont forget Saab put much more into engine technology than any other company with the APC system and developing a turbo charged system for EVERYDAY USE. they stuck with 4 cylinder turbo engines when every one else went to a V6. So to me a Saab is a smart car just cuz its the only one who thought out side the box from day one with everything!:)
vtec is good really mostly with forced induction but they tend to blow up :/ but if you get a legit one which are hard to come by! then yea you can have a beast on your hands! i preffer awd dsm's no traction issues what so ever! :D
The reason hondas run faster with less hp is because they are much lighter in weight. Saabs have crumple zones and even stripped to nothing weigh 2400lbs. Hondas can easily run in the 1500lb range, its simple power to weight. This car ran 10.42 at 142mph. Saabs also make huge torque and will beat many cars on the road from a roll, its something that has to be experienced.
165-225km/h in 3.6 sec.....
so Im guessing it did the 1/8th in 7.4 sec @ 165??
Where can I get the front and back bumper?
its custom made by them
Ye but this isnt a 9-3 its a 900 OR the first model of 9-3 with the T5 system.
@zzgocartman Woah, crazy! :)
@Supersupra87 only a very few true tuner/race civics or acruas run that fast on a N/A setup. the only reason alot dont is because of the motors tendency to be weak (and people dont know what theyre doing) and dont like a whole lot of power but it can be done with the right engine like the b18 or k20 but after dumping enough money into it to buy a 11second car in the first place really. the stanard for civics in the USA are 18 seconds hahahaha X^D
That Alfa 147 would probably break apart on half a track , sorry the truth is hard...
songname?
i saw another video same car and it does 1/4 in 10.41 sec
+1 this. Saabs weren't design to handle. The chassis flexed like a noodle, and 60+% of the weight is in the front. Not to mention it's set up for comfort. but in the case of this car thats irrelevant
We know, thanks to GM! A useless Opel platform
@@fortune300 well the b234r can take 800hp on stock internals! find me another 4 cyl that can do this, only gm can and did! this engine is insane ! it is the best 4 cyl ever made !
@dryadson Still, better than being owned by GM
16~18sec for the granny non-vtec engine.. yes, lol... ~12sec K20 stock engine (hatchback). Putting a K20 in is not that difficult.... Is there any Saab that goes under 10sec 1/4mile ??? :-----)
I dont hate saab, i just hate when they give it 6 of 5...... Maybe 6/5 compared to Saab cars only, then yes.
Maybe they just like bimmers :) I personally love BMWs including the old ones...
no, its not good for a front driven cars. examples of that is ford focus, honda integra etc. its way to much weight on the front wheels and it understeers. and for the record - i drive a bmw z4 2,5si.
filmed with a microwave.
Rick Roll
2 bad saab aint swedish no more
Spyker from HOLLAND owns it now
Ha this car will out run a 850R ... one the 850 R weighs a ton! like its fuckin heavy! .. the 9-3 doesn't have alot of weight so its faster on the long haul. thats it. cuz its gonna need all its power to haul its self down the line and the 9-3 well Viggen anyway has a good sharp torque band and would gladly take on ur 850 R :P
No more saab.....
The handling on a 9-3 SE is awful, I've owned one, if you think they handle well you're on crack.
The handling on an integra type-r is very good by any cars standards, fwd or not. I'd imagine you'd struggle to keep up with one on the twisties with your z4
Some of the Volvo cars from autotech is better than this Saab and they are also front-wheel drive
alfa romeo 147 gt would beat u no bothet :)) sorry,thruth:)
lol, Acceleration 6 of 5. Bullshit...
The Civic type-r got 3 of 5, because of the fwd. Supra and skyline got 5 of 5.... this doesnt make any sense.
"11.01 sec, try beating that with another FWD car" lol...... , 11sec is pretty much a standard with Honda civics in the USA. they are running 10sec and lower with 4cylinder NON TURBO engines.
How many thumbs down do i get now ? xD