a IFV variant of the Milrem Type X could be something . . . the Type X will be turretless & the hull will be raised a few inches to comfortably accommodate 3 - 5 troops in full tactical gear . . . the heightened hull will feature 2 roof hatches, one for the gunner & the other for observer . . . immediate forward of the roof hatch will incorporate a 25 MM GAU-12/U six-barrel rotary cannon & a custom 13.5 MM HMG . . . both mounted to a 360° deg rotating remote weapons station . . . the Type X suspension setup could do with a proper heavy duty 5.0 in. suspension lift for enhanced off roadability across rough terrain . . .
Robotic vehicles. Cheap and you don't care if it gets destroyed. But it still has firepower to make it a real threat and has armor to make them have to use something anti tank to kill it. Down side is ECM will wreck it
Type X and themis are very good looking but they seem to move relatively slow( even if it says 80 km h max road speed) , I understand that autonomous or remotely operated vehicles are difficult to move fast because of the important data flux creating latency. My point is that, for now they seem useless on the battlefield and just are huge slow moving expensive targets for the enemies (stop , acquire, validate, then fire) And please give that themis a hydraulic suspension system especially if soldiers hop on it
We humans shouldn't rely too much on robots replacing human soldiers, because robots don't have a heart of honor. We humans, on the other hand, have a heart and we must be the ones to win the war with our own hands, otherwise it means that we have learned nothing from history!
@@Lord_Juvens AMERICA is not angle, look what they did to japan and iraqi citizen. ThIs Ukraine fight is also American fault. they put nato troops near their border and blow up russian gas pipe that was supplying gas to Europe. Anyone would of get upset if someone did this to them.
@@Desert_Kingdom NATO troop build-up came AFTER the invasion, same as blowing up nord stream. You must be a special kind of idiot if you think it's someone elses fault than a country invading another. That countries want to join NATO is the logical move as we can see now, the fear of Russia not respecting sovereign countries was justified. Thank god the Baltics are already in NATO so Russia keeps their greedy fingers off them. Keep making up crap to justify an invasion all you want, but anyone with at least a minimum of mental capacities sees the flaws in your non-existent logic.
Your statement makes no sense. AI and Robotics will be save lives on the battlefield. The Russians have been exposed. Their military sucks. They’re literally sending people into combat “meat grinder” missions with no weapons or ammo! Killing a drone or UAV means someone lives. They perform high risk missions better than a human in most cases.
@@Desert_KingdomYou are talking propaganda nonsense. Nobody is forced to join NATO btw. The countries joined because they fear Russias aggression and it is their choice because we can already what Russia did to Georgia and Chechnia and now Ukraine. So dont be a fool, NATO is mostly defensive. Also look at Finland and Sweden, they were neuteal until Russia attacked Ukraine. Use the brain that you have for logical thinking and dont get fooled by russian propaganda. At the end it isnt NATOs fault, it is Russia. As you said NATO is not an angel but Russia must be the devil then.
a IFV variant of the Milrem Type X could be something . . . the Type X will be turretless & the hull will be raised a few inches to comfortably accommodate 3 - 5 troops in full tactical gear . . . the heightened hull will feature 2 roof hatches, one for the gunner & the other for observer . . . immediate forward of the roof hatch will incorporate a 25 MM GAU-12/U six-barrel rotary cannon & a custom 13.5 MM HMG . . . both mounted to a 360° deg rotating remote weapons station . . . the Type X suspension setup could do with a proper heavy duty 5.0 in. suspension lift for enhanced off roadability across rough terrain . . .
Wonderful design
Robotic vehicles. Cheap and you don't care if it gets destroyed. But it still has firepower to make it a real threat and has armor to make them have to use something anti tank to kill it.
Down side is ECM will wreck it
Great and interesting,
Willing to know more and future deal
A loot's of guns !
Робот наблюдатель круто
❤
Really excellent 💝
Type X and themis are very good looking but they seem to move relatively slow( even if it says 80 km h max road speed) , I understand that autonomous or remotely operated vehicles are difficult to move fast because of the important data flux creating latency.
My point is that, for now they seem useless on the battlefield and just are huge slow moving expensive targets for the enemies (stop , acquire, validate, then fire)
And please give that themis a hydraulic suspension system especially if soldiers hop on it
What price this toys?
All amazing and i cant afford it.
I heard Milker this entire video....
Top
Rvc 8.8 zırhlı araç üzerine Altay 4 130mm insansız kulesini enterge ettim tasarımı ve
Akıl sagligin yerinde değil dostum
3 weeks ago
We humans shouldn't rely too much on robots replacing human soldiers, because robots don't have a heart of honor. We humans, on the other hand, have a heart and we must be the ones to win the war with our own hands, otherwise it means that we have learned nothing from history!
Yeah, tell that the Russians 🤔
@@Lord_Juvens AMERICA is not angle, look what they did to japan and iraqi citizen. ThIs Ukraine fight is also American fault. they put nato troops near their border and blow up russian gas pipe that was supplying gas to Europe. Anyone would of get upset if someone did this to them.
@@Desert_Kingdom NATO troop build-up came AFTER the invasion, same as blowing up nord stream.
You must be a special kind of idiot if you think it's someone elses fault than a country invading another.
That countries want to join NATO is the logical move as we can see now, the fear of Russia not respecting sovereign countries was justified.
Thank god the Baltics are already in NATO so Russia keeps their greedy fingers off them.
Keep making up crap to justify an invasion all you want, but anyone with at least a minimum of mental capacities sees the flaws in your non-existent logic.
Your statement makes no sense. AI and Robotics will be save lives on the battlefield. The Russians have been exposed. Their military sucks. They’re literally sending people into combat “meat grinder” missions with no weapons or ammo! Killing a drone or UAV means someone lives. They perform high risk missions better than a human in most cases.
@@Desert_KingdomYou are talking propaganda nonsense. Nobody is forced to join NATO btw. The countries joined because they fear Russias aggression and it is their choice because we can already what Russia did to Georgia and Chechnia and now Ukraine. So dont be a fool, NATO is mostly defensive.
Also look at Finland and Sweden, they were neuteal until Russia attacked Ukraine.
Use the brain that you have for logical thinking and dont get fooled by russian propaganda.
At the end it isnt NATOs fault, it is Russia. As you said NATO is not an angel but Russia must be the devil then.
😂😂😂😂😂
What did he say UK trials HMT?? is UK asking to acquire this platform???