That era is over. There are now more GMO crops grown in other countries than there are in the USA. GMO is just a breeding method. All breeding methods engineer better crops by various methods but none are as fast and accurate as GMO science and the new CRISPR gene editing. It s a common lie found on the internet that the EU banned GMOs but that is false. They import thousands of tons of US GMO grains each year. SOME EU countries ban growing them but not consuming them - the EU safety commission says all GMOs are safe. China, India, S America and Russia all eliminated their GMO bans completely. You are ignorant. Those countries now make their own GMO seed for their needs, mostly government projects that give the seed away free. Stop lying. *GMO 20-year safety endorsement: 280 science institutions, more than 3,000 studies* "Currently, there is a social and political controversy about the safety of foods produced from genetically modified (GM) crops. However, in the scientific community, there is no dispute or controversy regarding the safety of these crops. To date, more than 3,000 scientific studies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] have assessed the safety of these crops in terms of human health and environmental impact. These studies together with several reviews performed on a case-by-case from regulatory agencies around the world have enabled a solid and clear scientific consensus: GM crops have no more risk than those that have been developed by conventional breeding techniques.
In addition, there is also extensive literature that compiles the socioeconomic and environmental benefits that transgenic crops have reported in two decades of commercialization [9,10]. This document brings together the public statements of technical and scientific institutions that adhere to this consensus. I made an update based on this document from ChileBio that initially included 40 official documents representing about 190 institutions - the document from ChileBio was subsequently updated in 2017 with the institutions and statements attached here. The update shows that 284 technical and scientific institutions recognize the safety of GM crops and their potential benefits. Interestingly a large part of these institutions are located in Europe, the continent that has put more obstacles to the commercialization of these crops. On the other hand, the countries with most organizations in favor of GM crops are United Kingdom (33), United States (25), Italy (23), Spain (16) and Germany (11). In conclusion, 284 technical and scientific institutions recognize that GM crops are not riskier than those produced by conventional breeding, and/or the potential benefits of these crops." geneticliteracyproject.org/2017/06/19/gmo-20-year-safety-endorsement-280-science-institutions-more-3000-studies/
We could not feed the world as we do if it weren't genetic manipulation of organisms. GMO techniques are vital to meeting demands for food the world over. Furthermore, genetic manipulation of crops have made it possible to introduce into native foods the nutrients that may be missing in a traditional diet causing malnutrition and all that stems from that. For example, the introduction of the beta-carotene gene into rice in the Orient where vitamin A deficiency was common completely and promptly solved that problem seeing that the body converts beta-carotene into Vitamin A.
@@joncold4water Well if Bill Gates keep buying all the farms to close it or to build IA laboratory of course we are not gonna be able to feed everyone that is the hole idea 🤷🏻♂️ wake up my friend
Many countries have bandit, but in America, they let the big pharmaceuticals control everything, and because people are so healthy. They can’t have that because they make no money off of people being healthy. They’re never gonna give you the cure for cancer which other countries have because they make too much money off of Cancer so stop spending the money on cancer research it’s not going to that they’re never gonna give you the cure there are countries who have bio engineered food. You’re not allowed to buy it. You go to other countries you can taste the difference. Everything is so much more flavorful. It’s so much more healthier that’s why you seen and other countries they’re so skinny and they’re not overweight like we are in this country And are in certain states and certain countries all the stuff to keep us being sick kids want junk food every day they want fast food every day they’re hooked on it because they weren’t your children to be obese. They want your children to be really sick so they continue to make money off of our children Size size I see these fat people buying two large drinks now and they’re buying diet soda diet soda has a sweetener and that’s unhealthy for you but they continue to drink it. There’s no such thing as diet soda. OK it’s ridiculous. You’re buying something that isn’t even really a diet if you’re on a diet, you don’t drink soda.
Thank you for all this labeling, because it has caused me to buy less and less prepackaged and processed foods, and I feel AWESOME! It has been a real eye-opener to see how much food carries this label. Grow a garden and hunt and fish, because pretty soon the whole damn food supply is going to be made of this crap.
Only in America 😢 I will also add Shop local farms that grow organic plants Look for small ranches that have free range, pasture raised and pasture finished foodstuffs. Also...when it comes to lettuce...go for hydroponic so you know the soil was not contaminated by workers' bathrooming in the fields..( if you can't plant your own.). WASH your field grown/ tree grown foods so that they are cleaner.... When I was little, there were only normal foods, nothing was processed. In early grades we learned about FARMS not factories😢 We need yo go back to that.
Agenda 21 is to kill most of the population slowly and make them so sick that they have to go to doctor to get medicine so that big pharma can get richer. That was all a part of the elites plan for humanity
If you read the labeling info given out to the food companies, you would know the labeling is lame, not all bioengineered foods have to be listed. Many food groups are exempt too. The new labeling is better than none, but not all inclusive. Also, it was blatantly obvious that a lot of lobbying went into the criteria.
Nope. It is back again. It is all poison now here. You gotta struggle real good to find any natural non GMO/bioengineered food. All toxic and plastic without taste.
BioEngineering means so much more than just GMO. It is Scary and Not Necessary to Create FrankenFood in order to Control the Farm Industry while at the same time Slipping the Consumers The Mickey. Is it real meat or is it Grown in a Lab ? The name change from GMO to BioEngineering is the conditioning process towards Acceptance. This process has been used quite a lot over the past three years, and we have now come to recognize how Manipulative, and Dangerous it is. Everyone just close your eyes and swallow what we put out.
Sickening, just sickening! Will come a time when they will no longer even label things at all! Things such as gmo and crickets, what ever else they pretend is nutricious.
Well if that is the only thing that is available, you know what it will cause before you eat it. Even fruit and vegetables have been sprayed with a toxic spray by Bill Gates. Nothing has not been touched even the water ways so the fish is contaminated.
GMOs only exists because they are MORE nutritious and provide more food per acre. You are very ignorant. There is no issue with labeling so you lied about that. People Strongly Against GMOs Had Shakier Understanding Of Food Science, Study Finds Jan 26, 2019 "People who most intensely oppose genetically modified food think they know a lot about food science, but they actually know the least, according to a peer-reviewed paper published in January in the journal Nature Human Behaviour. GMOs are widely considered safe by scientists, but opponents have said they want more science on the potential harm so that subjective arguments aren't part of the equation. However, previous surveys have shown that providing more scientific facts about GMOs to people doesn't change their minds. The survey, conducted by four universities, asked 2,000 people in Europe and the United States how much they knew about genetically modified food, what their opinion was and how intense it was." Read the full coverage at: www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/01/26/687852367/people-strongly-against-gmos-had-shakier-understanding-of-food-science-study-fin The original peer reviewed study is here: www.harvestpublicmedia.org/post/study-people-opposed-gmos-don-t-know-much-about-science-they-think
The rest of your incomplete sentence: : "...far too late to wallow in conspiracy theories after the entire scientific world around the globe failed to find a single negative issue with GMO foods." *GMO 20-year safety endorsement: 280 science institutions, more than 3,000 studies* "Currently, there is a social and political controversy about the safety of foods produced from genetically modified (GM) crops. However, in the scientific community, there is no dispute or controversy regarding the safety of these crops. To date, more than 3,000 scientific studies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] have assessed the safety of these crops in terms of human health and environmental impact. These studies together with several reviews performed on a case-by-case from regulatory agencies around the world have enabled a solid and clear scientific consensus: GM crops have no more risk than those that have been developed by conventional breeding techniques.
In addition, there is also extensive literature that compiles the socioeconomic and environmental benefits that transgenic crops have reported in two decades of commercialization [9,10]. This document brings together the public statements of technical and scientific institutions that adhere to this consensus. I made an update based on this document from ChileBio that initially included 40 official documents representing about 190 institutions - the document from ChileBio was subsequently updated in 2017 with the institutions and statements attached here. The update shows that 284 technical and scientific institutions recognize the safety of GM crops and their potential benefits. Interestingly a large part of these institutions are located in Europe, the continent that has put more obstacles to the commercialization of these crops. On the other hand, the countries with most organizations in favor of GM crops are United Kingdom (33), United States (25), Italy (23), Spain (16) and Germany (11). In conclusion, 284 technical and scientific institutions recognize that GM crops are not riskier than those produced by conventional breeding, and/or the potential benefits of these crops." geneticliteracyproject.org/2017/06/19/gmo-20-year-safety-endorsement-280-science-institutions-more-3000-studies/
Yes important to read the labels. I had some samples of this protein powder from the health food store. They have some products that are organic that this protein powder has pea & rrice and when I asked business a question if it was non-GMO they would not answer me they said look up on the website. It's so ridiculous. Oh but on the label is his organic cocoa shift. a bunch of crap
@@barbaraclayton6053 When consumers are as ignorant as you, the labels are not enough. The organic industry propaganda goons have poisoned your mind with activist lies. They don't want you to know there are no GMO peas or rice or wheat sold in the US. *60,000 food products with Non-GMO Project label may be “false or misleading,” FDA guidance document says* "The Non-GMO label may see its ubiquitous butterfly wings trimmed, according to a new guidance document from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) aimed at promoting accurate food marketing practices. In late March 2019, the agency released a set of recommended guidelines detailing how non-GMO and GMO-derived products should be labeled in order to comply with federal law. The update only “represents the current thinking” of the FDA on the issue and compliance with the new guidance is voluntary. But the agency identified specific kinds of information commonly found on non-GMO labels as “false or misleading,” suggesting the FDA wants food companies to rethink their marketing strategies. The clarification also may open the door to legal challenges of companies using non-GMO labels that can be seen as deceiving to consumers. Varieties of everything from beer to breakfast cereal are marketed as non-GMO in grocery stores across the US. That includes thousands of foods that do not have a GMO version on the market, including salt, raisins and tomatoes. For the most part, those who embrace non-GMO labeling, many of them committed organic food advocates, share the same fundamental animosity toward so-called genetically engineered foods. Some, like the organic industry group Just Label It, also argue that the labels promote “transparency in our food system.” Many farmers and scientists argue just the opposite, saying that such labels promote confusion and the misleading belief that non-GMO products are safer or more nutritious than their genetically engineered counterparts. Last fall, the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, an organization that has been rated by the University of Pennsylvania as the top science and technology think tank in the US, submitted a citizen’s petition to the FDA challenging the use of the Non-GMO Project’s logo, saying that it “deliberately deceives and misleads consumers in violation of the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.” “They are exactly the sort of deceptive and misleading labels Congress was intent on prohibiting,” Val Giddings, a geneticist and senior fellow at the ITIF, told the GLP by email. ITIF petitioned the FDA “….to issue a regulation prohibiting the use of the term ‘Non-GMO’ on consumer foods and goods and requiring distributors to omit any ‘Non-GMO’ term or claims on their labeling.” Many products brandish various non-GMO labels, including eggs, green beans and walnuts (among many more examples), which don’t have genetically engineered equivalents on the market. Some of them, like the FDA’s example of salt, don’t contain any DNA whatsoever. Advertising a product that contains no DNA as “non-GMO” is misleading. Henry Miller, the founding director of the FDA’s Office of Biotechnology, has argued that these labels prompt “nearly half of consumers [to] avoid GMO-labeled foods.” He called on the FDA to go further and stop food companies from marketing products as non-GMO when there are no GMO equivalents available to the public." geneticliteracyproject.org/2019/04/11/30000-food-products-with-non-gmo-project-label-may-be-false-or-misleading-fda-guidance-document-says/ Edit note: since this letter was released the number of misleading labels has doubled. It originally said 30K, I changed it to 60K based on current data.
What a good little puppet you are! If you are under 40 years old you have never seen a world free of the largest longest marketing propaganda campaign in all history. Organic industry tyranny for 33 years and counting: "Although GMOs are regarded as safe as their conventional counterparts by every major food safety authority in the world, the organic industry spends nearly $3 billion a year through over 330 different organizations leading with fear and “information spin” as an industry to sell their products. They also sent a $160,000 cash bribe to the IARC to buy that claim of a low cancer risk from glyphosate, it paved the way for abuse of our legal system in false cancer lawsuits. By creating an unfounded fear that requires tighter regulations on GMO crops, they are hoping to force them out of the food supply, thereby creating a bigger market share to sell more products in their more than $65 billion wheelhouse. The unfortunate consequence of these [non-GMO] labels is that the food companies and lobbyists tend to create an unnecessary “us vs. them” divide. When food companies use fear against competitors to sell a product, farmers take it personally." www.agdaily.com/insights/farm-babe-label-trends-end/ Now why do you suppose organic food is so expensive?? Imagine what 3 billion dollars could do for humanitarian goals - end a different disease forever every year.... End all hunger in at least one country...... Funding nasty propaganda? Really?? www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Markets/The-organic-food-industry-has-been-engaged-in-a-multi-decade-public-disinformation-campaign-claims-report?OnSite&
Organic has been the biggest joke in the world. You need to get off You Tube and watch real people tell the truth. Pay more for geo engineered food, that isn't marked.
This is how they are pedaling pedaphilia also. " It's no longer pedaphilia....it's minor attracted persons". The sorcery being used through the manipulation of words along with a certain "hype" in her voice is how they push these things over the publics head
Hey you sicko demon - you are flagged for this hate speech offense and your channel is reported. You are so ignorant you spelled pedophilia wrong! This is only over YOUR head, not over their heads of anyone with a grade school education.
@@kittybeck151 Wrong!!! YOU and millions like YOU are only fooled by this - read the articles and tell me this is not what happened to you, or continue to lie about it: If you are under 40 years old you have never seen a world free of the largest longest marketing propaganda campaign in all history. *Organic industry tyranny for 33 years and counting:* "Although GMOs are regarded as safe as their conventional counterparts by every major food safety authority in the world, the organic industry spends nearly $3 billion a year through over 330 different organizations leading with fear and “information spin” as an industry to sell their products. They also sent a $160,000 cash bribe to the IARC to buy that claim of a low cancer risk from glyphosate, it paved the way for abuse of our legal system in false cancer lawsuits. By creating an unfounded fear that requires tighter regulations on GMO crops, they are hoping to force them out of the food supply, thereby creating a bigger market share to sell more products in their more than $65 billion wheelhouse. The unfortunate consequence of these [non-GMO] labels is that the food companies and lobbyists tend to create an unnecessary “us vs. them” divide. When food companies use fear against competitors to sell a product, farmers take it personally." www.agdaily.com/insights/farm-babe-label-trends-end/ Now why do you suppose organic food is so expensive?? Imagine what 3 billion dollars could do for humanitarian goals - end a different disease forever every year.... End all hunger in at least one country...... Funding nasty propaganda? Really?? www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Markets/The-organic-food-industry-has-been-engaged-in-a-multi-decade-public-disinformation-campaign-claims-report?OnSite&
Margaret I agree with what you wrote, but I think I probably disagree with you if we go a little further. Every single time I see a demand, in a law or in a proposal, for labeling of GMO/bioengineered food, it always wants to tell the consumer only whether SOMETHING in the food is bioengineered. It never wants you to know WHAT is bioengineered. If you are a consumer who has taken the trouble to educate yourself, you would know that there is no feature that is common to all bioengineered foods. If you have decided that you want, for example, to avoid GMO foods that are from herbicide tolerant plants, the bioengineered label may be steering you, instead, away from a food with an added vitamin, or a food that uses less of a pesticide, or a food that was protected from a plant disease. And all those non-GMO Project labels you see in products in the stores are just as bad in the other direction. They label as GMO-free a whole bunch of foods that couldn't possibly be GMO. What good is the GMO-free icon on a bottle of olive oil, when all olive oil is GMO free? What good is the GMO-free icon on a head of lettuce when all lettuce is GMO free? And almost as bad is that they have decided that some foods are GMO which you would never consider to be GMO. For example, I don't know if you consider a food to be GMO when it's meat or milk from an animal that was fed with a GMO grain. I don't know if you consider a food to be GMO when all the novel protein or DNA has been removed by processing, like sugar or vegetable oil. I have talked to lawmakers who wanted to write labeling laws, and asked them to identify the ingredient that is bioengineered. They all give some deceptive reason why they don't want to do that.
My family used to like Graham crackers and milk. Now you can find any without the Bio ingredients added. Now they have the taste and consistency of wet sawdust.
Because the fact is that cloud seeding is a desperate experiment that rarely works. GMOs for floods, salty soils, extreme temperatures and plant disease control are saving more lives every day.
@@skylarsartnphotography3450 No you will not. You are just repeating a mindless RUclips meme that people can't actually do. Hobby gardens are fine but you can't grow your own grains and oil seeds and many other foods/meats. Your climate determines how much you get from a garden and you will spend every winter eating dried, pickled, canned and smoked foods that take a long time to process and a lot of room to store. Grow up and educate yourself! Swiss lied about GMOs being dangerous - They are tested to the same standard used for drugs, meaning they are safer than any other food you can buy. Nobody tests organic, heirloom or conventional produce, YOU are the guinea pig for those. Organic foods are the only ones that have consistently poisoned and killed consumers with e-coli and excessive toxic organic pesticides. Organic zucchinis have in fact poisoned and killed people while the mainstream GMO zucchinis are safe from containing the toxic curcubitan that regular zucchinis contain. That is why they are all GMO in our markets - safety.
If a company goes to such lengths to hide their ingredients -- particularly with just a QR code -- I automatically don't want their food products. Coming soon :Soylent Green?
You already are. Peoples health is crap now. Diabetes And allergies alone. You are paying higher insurance rates with all that this is affecting. As just a couple examples. As long as they make profits. That’s all that matters.
We DESERVE to know what's in our food! Not in scientific language but plain simple English. You should not need a chemistry degree to know the truth. This QR scan crap is WRONG!! Where is our FDA? Who do they work for? APPARENTLY not the American people. If I can't read your labels, I buy from companies whose labels I can READ!!!
GMO Be From list of like 12 different ingredients Bi Engendered To a list could be from 54 different ingredients. I guess it good for USA When other countries outlawed it February 2022
That era is over. There are now more GMO crops grown in other countries than there are in the USA. GMO is just a breeding method. All breeding methods engineer better crops by various methods but none are as fast and accurate as GMO science and the new CRISPR gene editing. It s a common lie found on the internet that the EU banned GMOs but that is false. They import thousands of tons of US GMO grains each year. SOME EU countries ban growing them but not consuming them - the EU safety commission says all GMOs are safe. China, India, S America and Russia all eliminated their GMO bans completely. You are ignorant. Those countries now make their own GMO seed for their needs, mostly government projects that give the seed away free. Stop lying. *GMO 20-year safety endorsement: 280 science institutions, more than 3,000 studies* "Currently, there is a social and political controversy about the safety of foods produced from genetically modified (GM) crops. However, in the scientific community, there is no dispute or controversy regarding the safety of these crops. To date, more than 3,000 scientific studies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] have assessed the safety of these crops in terms of human health and environmental impact. These studies together with several reviews performed on a case-by-case from regulatory agencies around the world have enabled a solid and clear scientific consensus: GM crops have no more risk than those that have been developed by conventional breeding techniques.
In addition, there is also extensive literature that compiles the socioeconomic and environmental benefits that transgenic crops have reported in two decades of commercialization [9,10]. This document brings together the public statements of technical and scientific institutions that adhere to this consensus. I made an update based on this document from ChileBio that initially included 40 official documents representing about 190 institutions - the document from ChileBio was subsequently updated in 2017 with the institutions and statements attached here. The update shows that 284 technical and scientific institutions recognize the safety of GM crops and their potential benefits. Interestingly a large part of these institutions are located in Europe, the continent that has put more obstacles to the commercialization of these crops. On the other hand, the countries with most organizations in favor of GM crops are United Kingdom (33), United States (25), Italy (23), Spain (16) and Germany (11). In conclusion, 284 technical and scientific institutions recognize that GM crops are not riskier than those produced by conventional breeding, and/or the potential benefits of these crops." geneticliteracyproject.org/2017/06/19/gmo-20-year-safety-endorsement-280-science-institutions-more-3000-studies/
@@PeggyAmaya That is a lie. There is no law that says top experts in biotech must be shot in the head when they leave a job at Monsanto, which has now been gone for 5 years. These professionals must sign a contract for any conflict of interest protection. The USDA is so universally trusted that it wrote the Codex Alimentarius for the world. The entire world uses these food safety guidelines. You are way too ignorant to be making such comments.
@@popeyegordonIt is an observation. Biotech is corrupt, medicine is corrupt, medical bioiogy academics are corrupt. You are way too indoctrinated to be taken seriously.
@@popeyegordon so changing the name of Monsanto, by becoming part of Bayer makes Monsanto no longer in existence? Does this affiliate the former Monsanto with Nazis and concentration camps?
Yes! They are ending up on the right side of science facts and consumer education. We are beating back the fear mongering propaganda of the organic thugs. If not for Trump our FDA would have already banned the word 'natural' and the term 'non-GMO from food labels.
I shop at Natural GROCERS. Their produce is 100% organically grown. I have not looked closely at their canned goods, most of which are organic or NON-GMO, but IF any BE or GMO foods skipped through, it would be a lot less than "commercial" brands. Organic food costs more to buy, but it is worth it. At least as long as we can still afford food.
That's an incredibly ignorant and worn out old conspiracy theory. There are only 3 fresh GMO produce items available in stores and you don't know what they are. Stupid shoppers like you have been suckered by the organic industry propaganda campaign. People Strongly Against GMOs Had Shakier Understanding Of Food Science, Study Finds Jan 26, 2019 "People who most intensely oppose genetically modified food think they know a lot about food science, but they actually know the least, according to a peer-reviewed paper published in January in the journal Nature Human Behaviour. GMOs are widely considered safe by scientists, but opponents have said they want more science on the potential harm so that subjective arguments aren't part of the equation. However, previous surveys have shown that providing more scientific facts about GMOs to people doesn't change their minds. The survey, conducted by four universities, asked 2,000 people in Europe and the United States how much they knew about genetically modified food, what their opinion was and how intense it was." Read the full coverage at: www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/01/26/687852367/people-strongly-against-gmos-had-shakier-understanding-of-food-science-study-fin The original peer reviewed study is here: www.harvestpublicmedia.org/post/study-people-opposed-gmos-don-t-know-much-about-science-they-think
@@cynthiakeller5954 No. Not like that in any way. That's an incredibly ignorant and worn out old conspiracy theory. There are only 3 fresh GMO produce items available in stores and you don't know what they are. Stupid shoppers like you have been suckered by the organic industry propaganda campaign. People Strongly Against GMOs Had Shakier Understanding Of Food Science, Study Finds Jan 26, 2019 "People who most intensely oppose genetically modified food think they know a lot about food science, but they actually know the least, according to a peer-reviewed paper published in January in the journal Nature Human Behaviour. GMOs are widely considered safe by scientists, but opponents have said they want more science on the potential harm so that subjective arguments aren't part of the equation. However, previous surveys have shown that providing more scientific facts about GMOs to people doesn't change their minds. The survey, conducted by four universities, asked 2,000 people in Europe and the United States how much they knew about genetically modified food, what their opinion was and how intense it was." Read the full coverage at: www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/01/26/687852367/people-strongly-against-gmos-had-shakier-understanding-of-food-science-study-fin The original peer reviewed study is here: www.harvestpublicmedia.org/post/study-people-opposed-gmos-don-t-know-much-about-science-they-think
@@cynthiakeller5954 Hey you hateful science illiterate conspiratards - GMO conspiracy theories Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org › wiki › GMO_conspiracy_th... "An example of Monsanto-based conspiracy theorizing were the claims by some anti-GMO activists that Monsanto banned GMOs from their cafeterias"
No proof? NEVER HAPPENED!!! Where is your proof of a single case of 'poisoning' of a human or animal from safe, fully tested GMO food crops? All the documented poisoning cases are from organic foods containing e-coli or toxic plants like the non-GMO zucchini. Organic/wild zucchinis contain varying amounts of a deadly toxin called curcubitan. This has sickened and killed people, hence all zucchinis in markets are GMO. GMO 20-year safety endorsement: 280 science institutions, more than 3,000 studies "Currently, there is a social and political controversy about the safety of foods produced from genetically modified (GM) crops. However, in the scientific community, there is no dispute or controversy regarding the safety of these crops. To date, more than 3,000 scientific studies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] have assessed the safety of these crops in terms of human health and environmental impact. These studies together with several reviews performed on a case-by-case from regulatory agencies around the world have enabled a solid and clear scientific consensus: GM crops have no more risk than those that have been developed by conventional breeding techniques.
In addition, there is also extensive literature that compiles the socioeconomic and environmental benefits that transgenic crops have reported in two decades of commercialization [9,10]. This document brings together the public statements of technical and scientific institutions that adhere to this consensus. I made an update based on this document from ChileBio that initially included 40 official documents representing about 190 institutions - the document from ChileBio was subsequently updated in 2017 with the institutions and statements attached here. The update shows that 284 technical and scientific institutions recognize the safety of GM crops and their potential benefits. Interestingly a large part of these institutions are located in Europe, the continent that has put more obstacles to the commercialization of these crops. On the other hand, the countries with most organizations in favor of GM crops are United Kingdom (33), United States (25), Italy (23), Spain (16) and Germany (11). In conclusion, 284 technical and scientific institutions recognize that GM crops are not riskier than those produced by conventional breeding, and/or the potential benefits of these crops." geneticliteracyproject.org/2017/06/19/gmo-20-year-safety-endorsement-280-science-institutions-more-3000-studies/
@@chrisa1146 Thanks for volunteering to prove your science illiteracy and total lack of debate skills to the world. It is now a matter of record and your employer can find this offense of yours. *Playing the shill gambit is always a forfeit of the debate at hand.* It is a pathetic form of cheating by trying to poison the well rather than countering with a cogent refutation that might prove your point or win a debate. I see lameoids pull this stupid blunder 10 times a day in the vaccines and GMO safety debates. If you want to prove a fault in science, use the tools scientists use, peer reviewed studies and unbiased information sources. If you don't have solid evidence, consider what a fool you are being. Shill shill shill just makes you look like a blathering idiot and forfeits every time, the win goes to science truth. Explained simply here(or in the dictionary of your choice): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_the_well This is especially ludicrous when you consider the full safety of vaccines has been clear for decades and the GMO safety debate ended five years ago and no company for profit anywhere would spend a single penny paying a "shill" to promote something already attained in 2016: allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2016/05/gmo-safety-debate-is-over/
@@flowerpower3618 they are increasing lists for Bioengineering products, leaving us less choices for us to eat products, that don’t have that labels! Eventually everything will be Bioengineering in the future! I did my research!
No it definitely is NOT or you would equally demand to see labels for other breeding methods such as seed selection, hybridization or grafting. But you don't because you are a science illiterate conspiratard manipulated by RUclips clickbait videos and the organic industry propaganda campaign. GMO is not an ingredient. Period.
Bioengineered labels, just means leave it on the store shelves to us. You compare products like ketchup for example, sold in this country and Canada or European nations. The stuff sold in the US is full of added garbage sugars, chemicals etc. They aren't allowed to sell that mess in other nations. Stick to foods as close to how the Lord made them, leave all the processed mess on the shelves.
There isn't enough labeling or clear labeling on these products. The best thing to do, for now anyway, is to avoid all prepared or processed foods. It is has an ingredient label then it is likely not good for you. If there is one word that you do not recognize or understand on an ingredient label, just know that that is intentional.
That is an idiotic hateful LIE from a hypocrite who wants us to think he is religious. You are just a hater. FDA launches “Feed Your Mind” website to educate about GE foods "On March 4, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) launched its “Feed Your Mind” website, which is the first public-facing product from the $7.5 million that Congress appropriated starting in 2017 for an agricultural biotechnology education and outreach initiative. According to the FDA, the initiative’s goal is to “share science-based information that educates, informs and broadens understanding about agricultural biotechnology for consumers.” Congress (and the special interests that lobbied for the appropriation) clearly intended to use the authoritative voice of the FDA to increase consumer understanding of agricultural biotechnology and correct misconceptions and misinformation. The initiative’s website includes fact sheets, infographics and videos. It will be followed later this year and in 2021 by additional materials for middle school classrooms, resources for health professionals and consumer materials. In reviewing “Feed Your Mind,” one finds information that is scientifically accurate (with reliable references) and relatively easy for a non-scientist to understand. If you know nothing about GMOs and read the website’s contents, you will clearly be better informed about what GMOs are, although not necessarily about why GMOs have been so controversial. The question that remains is how this website (which is not easy to find from the FDA’s homepage, nor does it quickly appear when entering basic questions about GMOs into an internet search engine) will educate a significant segment of American consumers. Will the FDA promote the website and its materials through an ad campaign? Will they send emails or postcards to Americans telling them to visit the website? I cannot imagine that the average American consumer visits FDA’s website with any great frequency. One can reasonably assume that the number of consumers who will search for the “Feed Your Mind” website, even if they know it exists, will be extremely small. So far, the FDA has only announced the website to its list of stakeholders. Much more outreach will be needed if the information they have generated is to have the impact Congress intended." Article source: geneticliteracyproject.org/2020/05/06/us-government-launches-gmo-website-may-allow-gm-crops-in-some-wildlife-refuges/ FDA site link: www.fda.gov/food/consumers/agricultural-biotechnology?CFSANCU_FeedYourMind_03042020&Eloqua
Because things will become like that and was always mentioned. Starvation is on the list, but in the meantime we will bring in the food with the poison in it to tide it over.
It needs to be stated clearly on the packaging and stickers on produce. People should not be required to have a cell phone when shopping so they can know what is in a product.
No it definitely is NOT or you would equally demand to see labels for other breeding methods such as seed selection, hybridization or grafting. But you don't because you are a science illiterate conspiratard manipulated by RUclips clickbait videos and the organic industry propaganda campaign. GMO is not an ingredient. There is no difference in the food, only the efficiency of growing that crop for our hard working farmers. Organic methods are unsustainable and conventional farming uses far more toxic pesticides and fuel and water.
@@user-md5ob6mg5o You are wrong. It definitely is NOT needed or you would equally demand to see labels for other breeding methods such as seed selection, hybridization or grafting. But you don't because you are a science illiterate conspiratard manipulated by RUclips clickbait videos and the organic industry propaganda campaign. GMO is not an ingredient. There is no difference in the food, only the efficiency of growing that crop for our hard working farmers. Organic methods are unsustainable and conventional farming uses far more toxic pesticides and fuel and water.
Stickers on fruit and vegetables DO identify Organic foods. Look for the numeric code on those stickers. The ones with FIVE NUMBERS BEGINNING WITH "9" ARE ORGANIC. This was a requirement pushed by the European Union years ago.
@@MG.50 This video and the foods shown in the thumbnail are USA sourced. The laws are about USA labeling. Brits have been making fools of themselves by caving to the minority organic propagandists, putting them into a silly conundrum. Organic farming is too inefficient for the EU to achieve its planned sustainability goals. EU labeling laws are different and not valid in comparison here. There are hundreds of ignorant amateur RUclips videos claiming to be informing consumers when in fact they are misleading you about PLU codes. Most of these channel owners could care less, they just re-post someone else's garbage for click bait revenue. "The PLU coding system is voluntary, not mandated by any governing body. There are currently over 1400 PLU codes issued for fresh produce and produce related items. Use of PLU Codes is with the understanding that IFPS accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect, special or other consequential damages of whatever kind resulting from whatever cause through the use of the PLU Codes or any information therein, even if IFPS has been advised of the possibility of such damages." www . ifpsglobal . com/PLU-Codes There was a change in the codes a few years ago and RUclips videos randomly ignore the changes or still have the old numbers presented as fact today. "Numbering conventions - Red tomatoes with PLU code in a supermarket. Non-organic produce is randomly assigned four-digit PLU codes in the 3000 and 4000 series.[1] Organic produce may be designated by prefixing the four-digit, non-organic PLU with a "9". For example, non-organic bananas are 4011, while organic bananas are 94011. In the future, the 83000 and 84000 series will be used; however, unlike the "9" prefix, the leading "8" will not denote a general category. (At one time, numbers prefixed with "8" were reserved for GMO products, but they were opened for general use after GMO growers didn't use them.)[4]" Wikipedia There is nothing stopping any grocer from using the typical organic codes on all their produce if they think you will buy more.
The words do not mean the same thing the bioengineered stuff covers a larger group of things. They do not mean the same thing they're trying to screw you over again!
This is so wrong!! It is very prejudiced against middle and lower income citizens and is very racist. How much money has Monsanto “donated” to the FDA for these new rules??
Just buy whole, organic food when possible. Cook from scratch. Don’t buy premade packaged “food”, especially if it has a QR code on it! Do your best to buy fresh, whole organic food in it’s natural state and cook/bake your own meals and snacks.
For a long while I wasted my time reading labels trying to find any boxed food that was free of Corn Syrup, Canola Oil, or Soy because of those three were GMO. I figured if I could avoid the three big GMO ingredients than I would also not be eating so much of the other other ingrediets that I can't even pronounce. One day it just clicked in my head, an understanding that almost all the boxed, canned, and jarred foods are ruined with these added poisons. I don't waste time reading the labels much any more because there is no point in even going down the aisle they are in. Like you said, we have to make everything ourselves.
IMO i have found that not too much taste the same anymore , its extremely salt ,the turkey ham ,slice y.cheese ,potted meat , corn beef etc etc etc So much for salt being bad for Hiphertension .
You don't have to eat preserved meats. That is your choice if you do. Our taste buds die and become less sensitive as we age. Duh!! How did you not know that fact?
Really ? Lab created food ! This is wrong in soo many ways ! You’re going to trust lab created anything ? I guess when God created it it wasn’t good enough ? In fact he told us not to do this ! But we keep thinking we know better 🤦♀️
I did the real unbiased factual research for you. Nobody wants to sell Shiva's books. They were banned from Amazon because they are just lies. *About the anti-biotech activist Vandana Shiva:* Shiva has attracted intense criticism from the scientific community for perpetuating long-debunked myths about agriculture, biotechnology and food safety.
"Shiva is scheduled to speak in late January at Stanford University and the University of California, Santa Cruz on “equitable and sustainable” farming methods. Her positions on a variety of issues have irked and at times outraged scientists who consider her a disseminator of misinformation who profits at the rate of $40,000 a lecture (or more) to spread propaganda critical of mainstream views of biotechnology. Raised in prosperity, this Indian Brahmin was formally trained as a philosopher, embracing and promoting a form of Quantum Theory that is now widely dismissed. She often falsely claims that she is a trained physicist, and those false ‘scientific’ credentials are often echoed by her supporters. The GLP has carried numerous articles about her history of misstatements and fabrications (here, here, here). She was the subject of a scathing critique, “Seeds of Doubt,” by Michael Specter of The New Yorker, which documented her history of misleading claims and what Specter maintained often verged on anti-science gibberish. For more than three decades, she has relentlessly campaigned against globalization, focusing on food and agriculture socio-economic issues and an opposition to GMOs, free trade and intellectual property rights. She alternately promotes land redistribution, indigenous and peasant farmers’ rights, organic-only food production and ayurvedic health practices over conventional medicines, all of which she characterizes as an “earth democracy” movement necessary to restore “harmony,” people and nature. Shiva receives financial backing from high-profile activist groups such as the Center for Food Safety, which shares offices with her in Washington. Among her most controversial talking points is her false claim that there was no hunger in India prior to the Green Revolution. The truth is almost 180 degrees the opposite, as the Green Revolution, marked in part by the introduction of synthetic chemical fertilizers and pesticides enable massive increases in food production. A recent review of the evidence shows, “the production of cereal crops tripled during this period, with only a 30% increase in land area cultivated.” Shiva also blames the Green Revolution for increasing poverty, indebtedness and despair among farmers. Her notorious allegation that the introduction of insect-resistant GMO crops in India led many farmers to commit suicide has been evaluated and dismissed as inaccurate. Shiva is also a fierce opponent of so-called Golden Rice, a crop engineered to combat vitamin A deficiency in developing countries. In response to the scheduling of her two talks at Stanford and UC Santa Cruz, 39 scientists from around the world co-authored an open letter to both universities protesting the invitations. The signatories told the GLP that their aim is to alert the events’ organizers, participants and attendees to the numerous falsehoods in Shiva’s philosophy. The letter, reproduced below in full, blasts Shiva for her “use of anti-scientific rhetoric to support unethical positions.” Neither university has scheduled a scientist to present the evidence-based case for crop biotechnology." geneticliteracyproject.org/2020/01/14/39-biotech-experts-open-letter-protests-anti-gmo-activist-vandana-shivas-anti-science-talks-at-stanford-and-uc-santa-cruz/
These GMO or bioengineered foods are illegal is many countries yet we continue to sell them in the US!
Yes. And America is still pushing the poison C19 vax even to babies!
They are everywhere, so many place don't put it on their labels. Don't be fooled.
@@vivrowe2763 You are the fool who is lying. You can only find 3 GMO produce items in US groceries and you don't know what those are.
That era is over. There are now more GMO crops grown in other countries than there are in the USA.
GMO is just a breeding method. All breeding methods engineer better crops by various methods but none are as fast and accurate as GMO science and the new CRISPR gene editing. It s a common lie found on the internet that the EU banned GMOs but that is false. They import thousands of tons of US GMO grains each year. SOME EU countries ban growing them but not consuming them - the EU safety commission says all GMOs are safe. China, India, S America and Russia all eliminated their GMO bans completely. You are ignorant. Those countries now make their own GMO seed for their needs, mostly government projects that give the seed away free. Stop lying.
*GMO 20-year safety endorsement: 280 science institutions, more than 3,000 studies*
"Currently, there is a social and political controversy about the safety of foods produced from genetically modified (GM) crops. However, in the scientific community, there is no dispute or controversy regarding the safety of these crops. To date, more than 3,000 scientific studies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] have assessed the safety of these crops in terms of human health and environmental impact. These studies together with several reviews performed on a case-by-case from regulatory agencies around the world have enabled a solid and clear scientific consensus: GM crops have no more risk than those that have been developed by conventional breeding techniques.
In addition, there is also extensive literature that compiles the socioeconomic and environmental benefits that transgenic crops have reported in two decades of commercialization [9,10].
This document brings together the public statements of technical and scientific institutions that adhere to this consensus. I made an update based on this document from ChileBio that initially included 40 official documents representing about 190 institutions - the document from ChileBio was subsequently updated in 2017 with the institutions and statements attached here.
The update shows that 284 technical and scientific institutions recognize the safety of GM crops and their potential benefits. Interestingly a large part of these institutions are located in Europe, the continent that has put more obstacles to the commercialization of these crops. On the other hand, the countries with most organizations in favor of GM crops are United Kingdom (33), United States (25), Italy (23), Spain (16) and Germany (11).
In conclusion, 284 technical and scientific institutions recognize that GM crops are not riskier than those produced by conventional breeding, and/or the potential benefits of these crops."
geneticliteracyproject.org/2017/06/19/gmo-20-year-safety-endorsement-280-science-institutions-more-3000-studies/
Because people are still TV mind controlled and uninformed and the NWO is still controlling the media
I don't believe a word they say. The food we eat is killing us
Amen to that 🙏🙏🙏🕊
Absolutely true , not to mention the cheap cheeseburger 🍔 s
We all have a choice on what we put in our bodies. I don't eat anything that is not real food.
@@Susan-cl3eb Yes indeed, even with how pricey and difficult it can be , I try to eat as clean as possible
Well the cautious thing you should do is top eating food.
Bioengineered means a whole lot more than GMO. Check it out people.
@ducky: I have tried checking it out. It is all such gobbledygook of explanations, and lies, how is one supposed to check it out?
It's disgusting.
Yeah but you want hear that on the lame stream media!
Exactly
@@riseharris5204 I don't use LSM
Bio engineering food should be banned completely
That will never happen 😔
We could not feed the world as we do if it weren't genetic manipulation of organisms. GMO techniques are vital to meeting demands for food the world over. Furthermore, genetic manipulation of crops have made it possible to introduce into native foods the nutrients that may be missing in a traditional diet causing malnutrition and all that stems from that. For example, the introduction of the beta-carotene gene into rice in the Orient where vitamin A deficiency was common completely and promptly solved that problem seeing that the body converts beta-carotene into Vitamin A.
Many of these other countries would not even eat bioengineered food.
@@joncold4water Well if Bill Gates keep buying all the farms to close it or to build IA laboratory of course we are not gonna be able to feed everyone that is the hole idea 🤷🏻♂️ wake up my friend
Many countries have bandit, but in America, they let the big pharmaceuticals control everything, and because people are so healthy. They can’t have that because they make no money off of people being healthy. They’re never gonna give you the cure for cancer which other countries have because they make too much money off of Cancer so stop spending the money on cancer research it’s not going to that they’re never gonna give you the cure there are countries who have bio engineered food. You’re not allowed to buy it. You go to other countries you can taste the difference. Everything is so much more flavorful. It’s so much more healthier that’s why you seen and other countries they’re so skinny and they’re not overweight like we are in this country And are in certain states and certain countries all the stuff to keep us being sick kids want junk food every day they want fast food every day they’re hooked on it because they weren’t your children to be obese. They want your children to be really sick so they continue to make money off of our children Size size I see these fat people buying two large drinks now and they’re buying diet soda diet soda has a sweetener and that’s unhealthy for you but they continue to drink it. There’s no such thing as diet soda. OK it’s ridiculous. You’re buying something that isn’t even really a diet if you’re on a diet, you don’t drink soda.
Thank you for all this labeling, because it has caused me to buy less and less prepackaged and processed foods, and I feel AWESOME! It has been a real eye-opener to see how much food carries this label. Grow a garden and hunt and fish, because pretty soon the whole damn food supply is going to be made of this crap.
be aware: fresh produce can be GMO and your meat sources can feed on GMO grains. So...are we really getting away from GMO/GE foods?
If you can afford one CJ, get a freeze dryer and you can store away food for up to 30 years.
and crap it is.
Just wondering if you got the Covid shots……you are bioengineered also if you did…….
Only in America 😢
I will also add
Shop local farms that grow organic plants
Look for small ranches that have free range, pasture raised and pasture finished foodstuffs.
Also...when it comes to lettuce...go for hydroponic so you know the soil was not contaminated by workers' bathrooming in the fields..( if you can't plant your own.).
WASH your field grown/ tree grown foods so that they are cleaner....
When I was little, there were only normal foods, nothing was processed.
In early grades we learned about FARMS not factories😢
We need yo go back to that.
Why dont the govt leave our food alone? They have messed up everything else.
Exactly I was saying same thing too. Can't eat foods I use to enjoy anymore thanks crap they put into the foods now.
Agenda 21 is to kill most of the population slowly and make them so sick that they have to go to doctor to get medicine so that big pharma can get richer. That was all a part of the elites plan for humanity
They want us dead
@@antoniojohnson6688 The food I use to enjoy doesn't even taste the same anymore.
I agree !
This is PURE EVIL!
Well they are satanists.
The food industry is using deceptive tactics? Imagine that.
If you read the labeling info given out to the food companies, you would know the labeling is lame, not all bioengineered foods have to be listed. Many food groups are exempt too. The new labeling is better than none, but not all inclusive.
Also, it was blatantly obvious that a lot of lobbying went into the criteria.
GMO / bioengineered is banned in Europe !
They want Americans dead
Nope. It is back again. It is all poison now here. You gotta struggle real good to find any natural non GMO/bioengineered food. All toxic and plastic without taste.
BioEngineering means so much more than just GMO. It is Scary and Not Necessary to Create FrankenFood in order to Control the Farm Industry while at the same time Slipping the Consumers The Mickey. Is it real meat or is it Grown in a Lab ? The name change from GMO to BioEngineering is the conditioning process towards Acceptance. This process has been used quite a lot over the past three years, and we have now come to recognize how Manipulative, and Dangerous it is. Everyone just close your eyes and swallow what we put out.
You’re right!
I don't want it either.
Well said!
I totally agree with you…
Exactly. The term "bioengineering" is really just a marketing scheme.
Banned by other countries. Bioengineering and GMO should be banned in USA.
Sickening, just sickening! Will come a time when they will no longer even label things at all! Things such as gmo and crickets, what ever else they pretend is nutricious.
Well if that is the only thing that is available, you know what it will cause before you eat it. Even fruit and vegetables have been sprayed with a toxic spray by Bill Gates. Nothing has not been touched even the water ways so the fish is contaminated.
GMOs only exists because they are MORE nutritious and provide more food per acre. You are very ignorant. There is no issue with labeling so you lied about that. People Strongly Against GMOs Had Shakier Understanding Of Food Science, Study Finds Jan 26, 2019 "People who most intensely oppose genetically modified food think they know a lot about food science, but they actually know the least, according to a peer-reviewed paper published in January in the journal Nature Human Behaviour.
GMOs are widely considered safe by scientists, but opponents have said they want more science on the potential harm so that subjective arguments aren't part of the equation. However, previous surveys have shown that providing more scientific facts about GMOs to people doesn't change their minds.
The survey, conducted by four universities, asked 2,000 people in Europe and the United States how much they knew about genetically modified food, what their opinion was and how intense it was." Read the full coverage at: www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/01/26/687852367/people-strongly-against-gmos-had-shakier-understanding-of-food-science-study-fin
The original peer reviewed study is here: www.harvestpublicmedia.org/post/study-people-opposed-gmos-don-t-know-much-about-science-they-think
Look up the video of Bill Gates talking about bioengineering food to depopulate the world at the world health organization meeting !
RUclips deleted my comment. Fascists!
True, but the countries he favor is getting 100% real food. He should be banned from the U.S. for good.
@@zeemc2751 He should be brought to Justice and pay for his crimes against humanity.
@@NikkiP_ Yes,
God is Just.
You better research this because it's not what their saying!! It's not safe at all!
I wouldn't expect any truth whatsoever coming from any news source these days
WOW NBC has discovered Bioengineered foods! By the time mainstream media discuss anything it is far too late.
The rest of your incomplete sentence: : "...far too late to wallow in conspiracy theories after the entire scientific world around the globe failed to find a single negative issue with GMO foods."
*GMO 20-year safety endorsement: 280 science institutions, more than 3,000 studies*
"Currently, there is a social and political controversy about the safety of foods produced from genetically modified (GM) crops. However, in the scientific community, there is no dispute or controversy regarding the safety of these crops. To date, more than 3,000 scientific studies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] have assessed the safety of these crops in terms of human health and environmental impact. These studies together with several reviews performed on a case-by-case from regulatory agencies around the world have enabled a solid and clear scientific consensus: GM crops have no more risk than those that have been developed by conventional breeding techniques.
In addition, there is also extensive literature that compiles the socioeconomic and environmental benefits that transgenic crops have reported in two decades of commercialization [9,10].
This document brings together the public statements of technical and scientific institutions that adhere to this consensus. I made an update based on this document from ChileBio that initially included 40 official documents representing about 190 institutions - the document from ChileBio was subsequently updated in 2017 with the institutions and statements attached here.
The update shows that 284 technical and scientific institutions recognize the safety of GM crops and their potential benefits. Interestingly a large part of these institutions are located in Europe, the continent that has put more obstacles to the commercialization of these crops. On the other hand, the countries with most organizations in favor of GM crops are United Kingdom (33), United States (25), Italy (23), Spain (16) and Germany (11).
In conclusion, 284 technical and scientific institutions recognize that GM crops are not riskier than those produced by conventional breeding, and/or the potential benefits of these crops."
geneticliteracyproject.org/2017/06/19/gmo-20-year-safety-endorsement-280-science-institutions-more-3000-studies/
Yes important to read the labels. I had some samples of this protein powder from the health food store. They have some products that are organic that this protein powder has pea & rrice and when I asked business a question if it was non-GMO they would not answer me they said look up on the website. It's so ridiculous. Oh but on the label is his organic cocoa shift. a bunch of crap
@@barbaraclayton6053 When consumers are as ignorant as you, the labels are not enough. The organic industry propaganda goons have poisoned your mind with activist lies. They don't want you to know there are no GMO peas or rice or wheat sold in the US.
*60,000 food products with Non-GMO Project label may be “false or misleading,” FDA guidance document says* "The Non-GMO label may see its ubiquitous butterfly wings trimmed, according to a new guidance document from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) aimed at promoting accurate food marketing practices. In late March 2019, the agency released a set of recommended guidelines detailing how non-GMO and GMO-derived products should be labeled in order to comply with federal law.
The update only “represents the current thinking” of the FDA on the issue and compliance with the new guidance is voluntary. But the agency identified specific kinds of information commonly found on non-GMO labels as “false or misleading,” suggesting the FDA wants food companies to rethink their marketing strategies. The clarification also may open the door to legal challenges of companies using non-GMO labels that can be seen as deceiving to consumers.
Varieties of everything from beer to breakfast cereal are marketed as non-GMO in grocery stores across the US. That includes thousands of foods that do not have a GMO version on the market, including salt, raisins and tomatoes. For the most part, those who embrace non-GMO labeling, many of them committed organic food advocates, share the same fundamental animosity toward so-called genetically engineered foods. Some, like the organic industry group Just Label It, also argue that the labels promote “transparency in our food system.” Many farmers and scientists argue just the opposite, saying that such labels promote confusion and the misleading belief that non-GMO products are safer or more nutritious than their genetically engineered counterparts.
Last fall, the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, an organization that has been rated by the University of Pennsylvania as the top science and technology think tank in the US, submitted a citizen’s petition to the FDA challenging the use of the Non-GMO Project’s logo, saying that it “deliberately deceives and misleads consumers in violation of the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.”
“They are exactly the sort of deceptive and misleading labels Congress was intent on prohibiting,” Val Giddings, a geneticist and senior fellow at the ITIF, told the GLP by email. ITIF petitioned the FDA “….to issue a regulation prohibiting the use of the term ‘Non-GMO’ on consumer foods and goods and requiring distributors to omit any ‘Non-GMO’ term or claims on their labeling.” Many products brandish various non-GMO labels, including eggs, green beans and walnuts (among many more examples), which don’t have genetically engineered equivalents on the market. Some of them, like the FDA’s example of salt, don’t contain any DNA whatsoever. Advertising a product that contains no DNA as “non-GMO” is misleading. Henry Miller, the founding director of the FDA’s Office of Biotechnology, has argued that these labels prompt “nearly half of consumers [to] avoid GMO-labeled foods.” He called on the FDA to go further and stop food companies from marketing products as non-GMO when there are no GMO equivalents available to the public." geneticliteracyproject.org/2019/04/11/30000-food-products-with-non-gmo-project-label-may-be-false-or-misleading-fda-guidance-document-says/
Edit note: since this letter was released the number of misleading labels has doubled. It originally said 30K, I changed it to 60K based on current data.
EAT ORGANIC ONLY. SPREAD THE WORD.🌎💯✌️💪
Yes and if you got the vaccine you are Bioengineered.
Exactly Bc they slowly Killin people it’s Terrible 😞
What a good little puppet you are! If you are under 40 years old you have never seen a world free of the largest longest marketing propaganda campaign in all history. Organic industry tyranny for 33 years and counting: "Although GMOs are regarded as safe as their conventional counterparts by every major food safety authority in the world, the organic industry spends nearly $3 billion a year through over 330 different organizations leading with fear and “information spin” as an industry to sell their products. They also sent a $160,000 cash bribe to the IARC to buy that claim of a low cancer risk from glyphosate, it paved the way for abuse of our legal system in false cancer lawsuits. By creating an unfounded fear that requires tighter regulations on GMO crops, they are hoping to force them out of the food supply, thereby creating a bigger market share to sell more products in their more than $65 billion wheelhouse. The unfortunate consequence of these [non-GMO] labels is that the food companies and lobbyists tend to create an unnecessary “us vs. them” divide. When food companies use fear against competitors to sell a product, farmers take it personally."
www.agdaily.com/insights/farm-babe-label-trends-end/
Now why do you suppose organic food is so expensive?? Imagine what 3 billion dollars could do for humanitarian goals - end a different disease forever every year.... End all hunger in at least one country...... Funding nasty propaganda? Really??
www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Markets/The-organic-food-industry-has-been-engaged-in-a-multi-decade-public-disinformation-campaign-claims-report?OnSite&
Repent & believe the Gospel, Jesus loves you and died for you on the cross so your sins can be forgiven
Organic has been the biggest joke in the world. You need to get off You Tube and watch real people tell the truth. Pay more for geo engineered food, that isn't marked.
Crimes against humanity
No, just crimes against US citizens.
This is how they are pedaling pedaphilia also. " It's no longer pedaphilia....it's minor attracted persons". The sorcery being used through the manipulation of words along with a certain "hype" in her voice is how they push these things over the publics head
Hey you sicko demon - you are flagged for this hate speech offense and your channel is reported. You are so ignorant you spelled pedophilia wrong! This is only over YOUR head, not over their heads of anyone with a grade school education.
They are only fooling themselves.
@@kittybeck151 Wrong!!! YOU and millions like YOU are only fooled by this - read the articles and tell me this is not what happened to you, or continue to lie about it: If you are under 40 years old you have never seen a world free of the largest longest marketing propaganda campaign in all history. *Organic industry tyranny for 33 years and counting:* "Although GMOs are regarded as safe as their conventional counterparts by every major food safety authority in the world, the organic industry spends nearly $3 billion a year through over 330 different organizations leading with fear and “information spin” as an industry to sell their products. They also sent a $160,000 cash bribe to the IARC to buy that claim of a low cancer risk from glyphosate, it paved the way for abuse of our legal system in false cancer lawsuits. By creating an unfounded fear that requires tighter regulations on GMO crops, they are hoping to force them out of the food supply, thereby creating a bigger market share to sell more products in their more than $65 billion wheelhouse. The unfortunate consequence of these [non-GMO] labels is that the food companies and lobbyists tend to create an unnecessary “us vs. them” divide. When food companies use fear against competitors to sell a product, farmers take it personally."
www.agdaily.com/insights/farm-babe-label-trends-end/
Now why do you suppose organic food is so expensive?? Imagine what 3 billion dollars could do for humanitarian goals - end a different disease forever every year.... End all hunger in at least one country...... Funding nasty propaganda? Really??
www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Markets/The-organic-food-industry-has-been-engaged-in-a-multi-decade-public-disinformation-campaign-claims-report?OnSite&
I’ve been seeing those labels & I avoid all labels that say that
When they say bioengineerd food. Then they do not have to list all the stuff in it!
whole foods market
If they say it's good don't eat it.
That label should NEVER be concealed in the "bar code". We WANT TO KNOW. And It needs to be in plain English, not computer sign.
Margaret I agree with what you wrote, but I think I probably disagree with you if we go a little further. Every single time I see a demand, in a law or in a proposal, for labeling of GMO/bioengineered food, it always wants to tell the consumer only whether SOMETHING in the food is bioengineered. It never wants you to know WHAT is bioengineered. If you are a consumer who has taken the trouble to educate yourself, you would know that there is no feature that is common to all bioengineered foods. If you have decided that you want, for example, to avoid GMO foods that are from herbicide tolerant plants, the bioengineered label may be steering you, instead, away from a food with an added vitamin, or a food that uses less of a pesticide, or a food that was protected from a plant disease.
And all those non-GMO Project labels you see in products in the stores are just as bad in the other direction. They label as GMO-free a whole bunch of foods that couldn't possibly be GMO. What good is the GMO-free icon on a bottle of olive oil, when all olive oil is GMO free? What good is the GMO-free icon on a head of lettuce when all lettuce is GMO free? And almost as bad is that they have decided that some foods are GMO which you would never consider to be GMO. For example, I don't know if you consider a food to be GMO when it's meat or milk from an animal that was fed with a GMO grain. I don't know if you consider a food to be GMO when all the novel protein or DNA has been removed by processing, like sugar or vegetable oil.
I have talked to lawmakers who wanted to write labeling laws, and asked them to identify the ingredient that is bioengineered. They all give some deceptive reason why they don't want to do that.
My family used to like Graham crackers and milk. Now you can find any without the Bio ingredients added. Now they have the taste and consistency of wet sawdust.
Better learn how to make them yourself!
Considering they've known how to seed the clouds and make it rain. Why do we need foods bioengineered against drought?
Because the fact is that cloud seeding is a desperate experiment that rarely works. GMOs for floods, salty soils, extreme temperatures and plant disease control are saving more lives every day.
ha ha good point!
Everything is just a lie.
The term " Acheta " is the labelling for
CRICKETS in your food. Enjoy
Eating dangerous chemicals and why the government won't band Bio engineered foods
GMO farming uses 37% LESS pesticides. Stop spitting in the faces of our honest hard working farmers and crop scientists.
@@popeyegordonEnjoy it! I'll pass and grow my own food
@@skylarsartnphotography3450 No you will not. You are just repeating a mindless RUclips meme that people can't actually do. Hobby gardens are fine but you can't grow your own grains and oil seeds and many other foods/meats. Your climate determines how much you get from a garden and you will spend every winter eating dried, pickled, canned and smoked foods that take a long time to process and a lot of room to store. Grow up and educate yourself!
Swiss lied about GMOs being dangerous - They are tested to the same standard used for drugs, meaning they are safer than any other food you can buy. Nobody tests organic, heirloom or conventional produce, YOU are the guinea pig for those.
Organic foods are the only ones that have consistently poisoned and killed consumers with e-coli and excessive toxic organic pesticides. Organic zucchinis have in fact poisoned and killed people while the mainstream GMO zucchinis are safe from containing the toxic curcubitan that regular zucchinis contain. That is why they are all GMO in our markets - safety.
If a company goes to such lengths to hide their ingredients -- particularly with just a QR code -- I automatically don't want their food products. Coming soon :Soylent Green?
It’s not nice to fool with Mother Nature!😢 we will pay the price years from now .
You don't have years, they want it all done by 2030 they started the clock about two week ago for the countdown to 2030.
Not if you do not eat processed foods. do not eat the poison. Yes, less convenient, but smarter
You already are.
Peoples health is crap now.
Diabetes
And allergies alone.
You are paying higher insurance rates with all that this is affecting. As just a couple examples.
As long as they make profits. That’s all that matters.
Bull Bioengineered means full of heavy metals and when you get to much metal it cause all kinds of deadly shit
They cross species. For example, a fish and a plant. A spider and a plant. Whoopee.
@bryan: I found v.fine metal shavings at bottom of Max house coffee by accident!!!
Oh i know its getting bad sue that company@@terywetherlow7970
These GMO/BE products are banned in Europe where food is food.
When the label changes from specific to generic for no obvious reason I find it suspicious.
We DESERVE to know what's in our food! Not in scientific language but plain simple English. You should not need a chemistry degree to know the truth. This QR scan crap is WRONG!! Where is our FDA? Who do they work for? APPARENTLY not the American people. If I can't read your labels, I buy from companies whose labels I can READ!!!
GMO
Be From list of like 12 different ingredients
Bi Engendered
To a list could be from
54 different ingredients.
I guess it good for USA
When other countries outlawed it
February 2022
That era is over. There are now more GMO crops grown in other countries than there are in the USA.
GMO is just a breeding method. All breeding methods engineer better crops by various methods but none are as fast and accurate as GMO science and the new CRISPR gene editing. It s a common lie found on the internet that the EU banned GMOs but that is false. They import thousands of tons of US GMO grains each year. SOME EU countries ban growing them but not consuming them - the EU safety commission says all GMOs are safe. China, India, S America and Russia all eliminated their GMO bans completely. You are ignorant. Those countries now make their own GMO seed for their needs, mostly government projects that give the seed away free. Stop lying.
*GMO 20-year safety endorsement: 280 science institutions, more than 3,000 studies*
"Currently, there is a social and political controversy about the safety of foods produced from genetically modified (GM) crops. However, in the scientific community, there is no dispute or controversy regarding the safety of these crops. To date, more than 3,000 scientific studies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] have assessed the safety of these crops in terms of human health and environmental impact. These studies together with several reviews performed on a case-by-case from regulatory agencies around the world have enabled a solid and clear scientific consensus: GM crops have no more risk than those that have been developed by conventional breeding techniques.
In addition, there is also extensive literature that compiles the socioeconomic and environmental benefits that transgenic crops have reported in two decades of commercialization [9,10].
This document brings together the public statements of technical and scientific institutions that adhere to this consensus. I made an update based on this document from ChileBio that initially included 40 official documents representing about 190 institutions - the document from ChileBio was subsequently updated in 2017 with the institutions and statements attached here.
The update shows that 284 technical and scientific institutions recognize the safety of GM crops and their potential benefits. Interestingly a large part of these institutions are located in Europe, the continent that has put more obstacles to the commercialization of these crops. On the other hand, the countries with most organizations in favor of GM crops are United Kingdom (33), United States (25), Italy (23), Spain (16) and Germany (11).
In conclusion, 284 technical and scientific institutions recognize that GM crops are not riskier than those produced by conventional breeding, and/or the potential benefits of these crops."
geneticliteracyproject.org/2017/06/19/gmo-20-year-safety-endorsement-280-science-institutions-more-3000-studies/
It should be illegal not to have to list it on the ingredients. Who is gonna know that a QR code means that it has a bio engineer ingredient?
Taste different and texture is different on most I've eaten😮
This is to get around telling you mrna is being added to food.
If they are safe why are they banned 1oo countries
They are everywhere, just not marked.
We allowed Monsanto CEO Michael Taylor to head the USDA. He made them USDA approved.
@@PeggyAmaya That is a lie. There is no law that says top experts in biotech must be shot in the head when they leave a job at Monsanto, which has now been gone for 5 years. These professionals must sign a contract for any conflict of interest protection. The USDA is so universally trusted that it wrote the Codex Alimentarius for the world. The entire world uses these food safety guidelines. You are way too ignorant to be making such comments.
@@popeyegordonIt is an observation. Biotech is corrupt, medicine is corrupt, medical bioiogy academics are corrupt. You are way too indoctrinated to be taken seriously.
@@popeyegordon so changing the name of Monsanto, by becoming part of Bayer makes Monsanto no longer in existence? Does this affiliate the former Monsanto with Nazis and concentration camps?
the people who come up with this crap know where they are going to end up
Yes! They are ending up on the right side of science facts and consumer education. We are beating back the fear mongering propaganda of the organic thugs. If not for Trump our FDA would have already banned the word 'natural' and the term 'non-GMO from food labels.
Food banks 😢
Filthy rich
Iam so glad I stopped buying prepackaged food, junk food, fast food or anything with added sugar and I feel termendous
My phone is only used for calls, texts and pictures. No searching the Internet or the QRcode bs.
Is there any where we can find food without this poison in it?
I shop at Natural GROCERS. Their produce is 100% organically grown. I have not looked closely at their canned goods, most of which are organic or NON-GMO, but IF any BE or GMO foods skipped through, it would be a lot less than "commercial" brands.
Organic food costs more to buy, but it is worth it. At least as long as we can still afford food.
Grow your own food....and not to mention its much cheaper too
I bet the people who is creating these foods won’t eat them. You have to be a smart and inform shopper.
That's an incredibly ignorant and worn out old conspiracy theory. There are only 3 fresh GMO produce items available in stores and you don't know what they are. Stupid shoppers like you have been suckered by the organic industry propaganda campaign. People Strongly Against GMOs Had Shakier Understanding Of Food Science, Study Finds Jan 26, 2019 "People who most intensely oppose genetically modified food think they know a lot about food science, but they actually know the least, according to a peer-reviewed paper published in January in the journal Nature Human Behaviour.
GMOs are widely considered safe by scientists, but opponents have said they want more science on the potential harm so that subjective arguments aren't part of the equation. However, previous surveys have shown that providing more scientific facts about GMOs to people doesn't change their minds.
The survey, conducted by four universities, asked 2,000 people in Europe and the United States how much they knew about genetically modified food, what their opinion was and how intense it was." Read the full coverage at: www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/01/26/687852367/people-strongly-against-gmos-had-shakier-understanding-of-food-science-study-fin
The original peer reviewed study is here: www.harvestpublicmedia.org/post/study-people-opposed-gmos-don-t-know-much-about-science-they-think
Like the x creators who didn't take the x in their arm.
@@cynthiakeller5954 No. Not like that in any way. That's an incredibly ignorant and worn out old conspiracy theory. There are only 3 fresh GMO produce items available in stores and you don't know what they are. Stupid shoppers like you have been suckered by the organic industry propaganda campaign. People Strongly Against GMOs Had Shakier Understanding Of Food Science, Study Finds Jan 26, 2019 "People who most intensely oppose genetically modified food think they know a lot about food science, but they actually know the least, according to a peer-reviewed paper published in January in the journal Nature Human Behaviour.
GMOs are widely considered safe by scientists, but opponents have said they want more science on the potential harm so that subjective arguments aren't part of the equation. However, previous surveys have shown that providing more scientific facts about GMOs to people doesn't change their minds.
The survey, conducted by four universities, asked 2,000 people in Europe and the United States how much they knew about genetically modified food, what their opinion was and how intense it was." Read the full coverage at: www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/01/26/687852367/people-strongly-against-gmos-had-shakier-understanding-of-food-science-study-fin
The original peer reviewed study is here: www.harvestpublicmedia.org/post/study-people-opposed-gmos-don-t-know-much-about-science-they-think
@@cynthiakeller5954 Hey you hateful science illiterate conspiratards -
GMO conspiracy theories Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › GMO_conspiracy_th...
"An example of Monsanto-based conspiracy theorizing were the claims by some anti-GMO activists that Monsanto banned GMOs from their cafeterias"
We are being poisoned from every angle
No proof? NEVER HAPPENED!!! Where is your proof of a single case of 'poisoning' of a human or animal from safe, fully tested GMO food crops? All the documented poisoning cases are from organic foods containing e-coli or toxic plants like the non-GMO zucchini. Organic/wild zucchinis contain varying amounts of a deadly toxin called curcubitan. This has sickened and killed people, hence all zucchinis in markets are GMO.
GMO 20-year safety endorsement: 280 science institutions, more than 3,000 studies
"Currently, there is a social and political controversy about the safety of foods produced from genetically modified (GM) crops. However, in the scientific community, there is no dispute or controversy regarding the safety of these crops. To date, more than 3,000 scientific studies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] have assessed the safety of these crops in terms of human health and environmental impact. These studies together with several reviews performed on a case-by-case from regulatory agencies around the world have enabled a solid and clear scientific consensus: GM crops have no more risk than those that have been developed by conventional breeding techniques.
In addition, there is also extensive literature that compiles the socioeconomic and environmental benefits that transgenic crops have reported in two decades of commercialization [9,10].
This document brings together the public statements of technical and scientific institutions that adhere to this consensus. I made an update based on this document from ChileBio that initially included 40 official documents representing about 190 institutions - the document from ChileBio was subsequently updated in 2017 with the institutions and statements attached here.
The update shows that 284 technical and scientific institutions recognize the safety of GM crops and their potential benefits. Interestingly a large part of these institutions are located in Europe, the continent that has put more obstacles to the commercialization of these crops. On the other hand, the countries with most organizations in favor of GM crops are United Kingdom (33), United States (25), Italy (23), Spain (16) and Germany (11).
In conclusion, 284 technical and scientific institutions recognize that GM crops are not riskier than those produced by conventional breeding, and/or the potential benefits of these crops."
geneticliteracyproject.org/2017/06/19/gmo-20-year-safety-endorsement-280-science-institutions-more-3000-studies/
@@popeyegordonPaid shill/troll
@@chrisa1146 Thanks for volunteering to prove your science illiteracy and total lack of debate skills to the world. It is now a matter of record and your employer can find this offense of yours. *Playing the shill gambit is always a forfeit of the debate at hand.* It is a pathetic form of cheating by trying to poison the well rather than countering with a cogent refutation that might prove your point or win a debate. I see lameoids pull this stupid blunder 10 times a day in the vaccines and GMO safety debates. If you want to prove a fault in science, use the tools scientists use, peer reviewed studies and unbiased information sources. If you don't have solid evidence, consider what a fool you are being. Shill shill shill just makes you look like a blathering idiot and forfeits every time, the win goes to science truth. Explained simply here(or in the dictionary of your choice): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_the_well This is especially ludicrous when you consider the full safety of vaccines has been clear for decades and the GMO safety debate ended five years ago and no company for profit anywhere would spend a single penny paying a "shill" to promote something already attained in 2016: allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2016/05/gmo-safety-debate-is-over/
I don’t like either names! Why are we being forced to eat those foods?
Forced?
@@flowerpower3618 they are increasing lists for Bioengineering products, leaving us less choices for us to eat products, that don’t have that labels! Eventually everything will be Bioengineering in the future! I did my research!
Bring on the NON bio engineered foods and labeling, make a whole section in the store for them. Vote with your dollar.
Don't buy processed foods!!!
Don't buy take away either, nor eat anything from places you don't know or are foreign owned.
Organic peanut butter is a processed food. So is applesauce. Think before you repeat memes fed to you by the organic industry propagandists.
Safe for humans - govt. always tell the truth - got it.
Stop messing with our food that’s nasty you wonder why so many people sick or overweight
I HAVE THROWN AWAY asO MUCH . TAUGHT ME TO READ THE LABELS and cook from SCRATCH.
Labelling is a MUST.
No it definitely is NOT or you would equally demand to see labels for other breeding methods such as seed selection, hybridization or grafting. But you don't because you are a science illiterate conspiratard manipulated by RUclips clickbait videos and the organic industry propaganda campaign. GMO is not an ingredient. Period.
Bioengineered labels, just means leave it on the store shelves to us. You compare products like ketchup for example, sold in this country and Canada or European nations. The stuff sold in the US is full of added garbage sugars, chemicals etc. They aren't allowed to sell that mess in other nations. Stick to foods as close to how the Lord made them, leave all the processed mess on the shelves.
There isn't enough labeling or clear labeling on these products. The best thing to do, for now anyway, is to avoid all prepared or processed foods. It is has an ingredient label then it is likely not good for you. If there is one word that you do not recognize or understand on an ingredient label, just know that that is intentional.
If they say its safe; we can be certain its not.
That is an idiotic hateful LIE from a hypocrite who wants us to think he is religious. You are just a hater. FDA launches “Feed Your Mind” website to educate about GE foods
"On March 4, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) launched its “Feed Your Mind” website, which is the first public-facing product from the $7.5 million that Congress appropriated starting in 2017 for an agricultural biotechnology education and outreach initiative. According to the FDA, the initiative’s goal is to “share science-based information that educates, informs and broadens understanding about agricultural biotechnology for consumers.” Congress (and the special interests that lobbied for the appropriation) clearly intended to use the authoritative voice of the FDA to increase consumer understanding of agricultural biotechnology and correct misconceptions and misinformation.
The initiative’s website includes fact sheets, infographics and videos. It will be followed later this year and in 2021 by additional materials for middle school classrooms, resources for health professionals and consumer materials.
In reviewing “Feed Your Mind,” one finds information that is scientifically accurate (with reliable references) and relatively easy for a non-scientist to understand. If you know nothing about GMOs and read the website’s contents, you will clearly be better informed about what GMOs are, although not necessarily about why GMOs have been so controversial. The question that remains is how this website (which is not easy to find from the FDA’s homepage, nor does it quickly appear when entering basic questions about GMOs into an internet search engine) will educate a significant segment of American consumers.
Will the FDA promote the website and its materials through an ad campaign? Will they send emails or postcards to Americans telling them to visit the website? I cannot imagine that the average American consumer visits FDA’s website with any great frequency. One can reasonably assume that the number of consumers who will search for the “Feed Your Mind” website, even if they know it exists, will be extremely small. So far, the FDA has only announced the website to its list of stakeholders. Much more outreach will be needed if the information they have generated is to have the impact Congress intended." Article source: geneticliteracyproject.org/2020/05/06/us-government-launches-gmo-website-may-allow-gm-crops-in-some-wildlife-refuges/ FDA site link: www.fda.gov/food/consumers/agricultural-biotechnology?CFSANCU_FeedYourMind_03042020&Eloqua
We learned that 3 yrs ago
Nothing but poison.....❤🇺🇸🐿✌🌱🌱
Then why are there food shortages? 🧐
Legit question!!
Because things will become like that and was always mentioned. Starvation is on the list, but in the meantime we will bring in the food with the poison in it to tide it over.
Climate change droughts and wars that use starvation as a weapon. This is in the news every day! Why are you so ignorant?
You have a great deal to learn about the NWO Agendas. Unplug the TV and start searching on the internet.
I don't remember any food shortages until Biden took office
The lablel should be the same on all products. May as well not have FDA .
It's all poison.
Not safe!!!
These people need to go to jail for poisoning my food!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So, are they accepted in other countries? If not, I don’t want it either.
Just stop messing with my dang food. Let nature grow it naturally.
I eat whole food, plant based and am healthier than ever! Why pay for “food” that kills you?
Got news, anything that says,"plant based" is bioengineered!!
It needs to be stated clearly on the packaging and stickers on produce. People should not be required to have a cell phone when shopping so they can know what is in a product.
No it definitely is NOT or you would equally demand to see labels for other breeding methods such as seed selection, hybridization or grafting. But you don't because you are a science illiterate conspiratard manipulated by RUclips clickbait videos and the organic industry propaganda campaign. GMO is not an ingredient. There is no difference in the food, only the efficiency of growing that crop for our hard working farmers. Organic methods are unsustainable and conventional farming uses far more toxic pesticides and fuel and water.
Agree
@@user-md5ob6mg5o You are wrong. It definitely is NOT needed or you would equally demand to see labels for other breeding methods such as seed selection, hybridization or grafting. But you don't because you are a science illiterate conspiratard manipulated by RUclips clickbait videos and the organic industry propaganda campaign.
GMO is not an ingredient. There is no difference in the food, only the efficiency of growing that crop for our hard working farmers. Organic methods are unsustainable and conventional farming uses far more toxic pesticides and fuel and water.
Stickers on fruit and vegetables DO identify Organic foods. Look for the numeric code on those stickers. The ones with FIVE NUMBERS BEGINNING WITH "9" ARE ORGANIC. This was a requirement pushed by the European Union years ago.
@@MG.50 This video and the foods shown in the thumbnail are USA sourced. The laws are about USA labeling. Brits have been making fools of themselves by caving to the minority organic propagandists, putting them into a silly conundrum. Organic farming is too inefficient for the EU to achieve its planned sustainability goals. EU labeling laws are different and not valid in comparison here.
There are hundreds of ignorant amateur RUclips videos claiming to be informing consumers when in fact they are misleading you about PLU codes. Most of these channel owners could care less, they just re-post someone else's garbage for click bait revenue.
"The PLU coding system is voluntary, not mandated by any governing body. There are currently over 1400 PLU codes issued for fresh produce and produce related items. Use of PLU Codes is with the understanding that IFPS accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect, special or other consequential damages of whatever kind resulting from whatever cause through the use of the PLU Codes or any information therein, even if IFPS has been advised of the possibility of such damages."
www . ifpsglobal . com/PLU-Codes
There was a change in the codes a few years ago and RUclips videos randomly ignore the changes or still have the old numbers presented as fact today. "Numbering conventions - Red tomatoes with PLU code in a supermarket. Non-organic produce is randomly assigned four-digit PLU codes in the 3000 and 4000 series.[1] Organic produce may be designated by prefixing the four-digit, non-organic PLU with a "9". For example, non-organic bananas are 4011, while organic bananas are 94011. In the future, the 83000 and 84000 series will be used; however, unlike the "9" prefix, the leading "8" will not denote a general category. (At one time, numbers prefixed with "8" were reserved for GMO products, but they were opened for general use after GMO growers didn't use them.)[4]" Wikipedia
There is nothing stopping any grocer from using the typical organic codes on all their produce if they think you will buy more.
Yes this needs to be removed from our food completly. It is not necessary to have them in our foods. Yes it is very deceitful.
The words do not mean the same thing the bioengineered stuff covers a larger group of things. They do not mean the same thing they're trying to screw you over again!
If in doubt…don’t buy…
Simple enough for me
I will not purchase any foods labeled “Contains a bioengineered food product”, or GMO foods.
This is so wrong!! It is very prejudiced against middle and lower income citizens and is very racist. How much money has Monsanto “donated” to the FDA for these new rules??
Hey nothing to see here …
Look over there 😅
Just a way to try and sneak there foods we don't want to eat in on us
It should not be in our food. Frankenfood. This is criminal
BS foods would be more accurate.
We will refuse to eat this garbage!! Other countries are banning these foods being shipped to their countries
Do not buy BIOENGINEERED food!! They are not safe!! There is absolutely no reason for this !!
Wait! what? This is making it more confusing for shoppers. It should be revised. Look for Organic labeling and you should be okay 👍
That is the plan. To confuse the shoppers. I'm not confused.
You still have to be careful, many prepackaged foods have toxic ingredients. Just because its organic doesnt make it automatically okay.
Better yet, eat real food that doesn't need a label!
The bioengineered food label sounds worse to me. Either way, I need to do better when I shop.
Things like changing the wording or, in the case of our government, redefining the words, do not change the facts. 😡
I don't believe that I don't buy nothing with bioengineered products in it
Just buy whole, organic food when possible. Cook from scratch. Don’t buy premade packaged “food”, especially if it has a QR code on it! Do your best to buy fresh, whole organic food in it’s natural state and cook/bake your own meals and snacks.
Stay away from bioengineering food!!! No they are not good for you
None of the Bioengineering food for me . None ,zero ,nada .
YEP, anything with that on it I don't buy and definitely don't eat! Make everything yourself
For a long while I wasted my time reading labels trying to find any boxed food that was free of Corn Syrup, Canola Oil, or Soy because of those three were GMO. I figured if I could avoid the three big GMO ingredients than I would also not be eating so much of the other other ingrediets that I can't even pronounce. One day it just clicked in my head, an understanding that almost all the boxed, canned, and jarred foods are ruined with these added poisons. I don't waste time reading the labels much any more because there is no point in even going down the aisle they are in. Like you said, we have to make everything ourselves.
IMO i have found that not too much taste the same anymore , its extremely salt ,the turkey ham ,slice y.cheese ,potted meat , corn beef etc etc etc So much for salt being bad for Hiphertension .
You don't have to eat preserved meats. That is your choice if you do. Our taste buds die and become less sensitive as we age. Duh!! How did you not know that fact?
How can it be legal for them to get away with these tricks?
I wonder if this is why so many people are getting cancer these days.
If you can, grow your own food!
Organic is the only way to go
deceitful, as always. If they were good for human bodies to eat, they would not have to be deceitful about them.
Why do they have to keep doing stuff to food. I have been reading labels lately. Won’t buy it if it is BIO. Or , GMO.
Don't buy anything bioengineered
No mRNA in foods!
Support your local farmers
It's not nice to fool Mother Nature
Good Reporting ! appreciated
Really ? Lab created food ! This is wrong in soo many ways ! You’re going to trust lab created anything ? I guess when God created it it wasn’t good enough ? In fact he told us not to do this ! But we keep thinking we know better 🤦♀️
We don't want it !!! 😡
Anyone curious on this subject should research Vandana Shiva and her books and lectures.
I did the real unbiased factual research for you. Nobody wants to sell Shiva's books. They were banned from Amazon because they are just lies. *About the anti-biotech activist Vandana Shiva:* Shiva has attracted intense criticism from the scientific community for perpetuating long-debunked myths about agriculture, biotechnology and food safety.
"Shiva is scheduled to speak in late January at Stanford University and the University of California, Santa Cruz on “equitable and sustainable” farming methods. Her positions on a variety of issues have irked and at times outraged scientists who consider her a disseminator of misinformation who profits at the rate of $40,000 a lecture (or more) to spread propaganda critical of mainstream views of biotechnology. Raised in prosperity, this Indian Brahmin was formally trained as a philosopher, embracing and promoting a form of Quantum Theory that is now widely dismissed. She often falsely claims that she is a trained physicist, and those false ‘scientific’ credentials are often echoed by her supporters. The GLP has carried numerous articles about her history of misstatements and fabrications (here, here, here). She was the subject of a scathing critique, “Seeds of Doubt,” by Michael Specter of The New Yorker, which documented her history of misleading claims and what Specter maintained often verged on anti-science gibberish.
For more than three decades, she has relentlessly campaigned against globalization, focusing on food and agriculture socio-economic issues and an opposition to GMOs, free trade and intellectual property rights. She alternately promotes land redistribution, indigenous and peasant farmers’ rights, organic-only food production and ayurvedic health practices over conventional medicines, all of which she characterizes as an “earth democracy” movement necessary to restore “harmony,” people and nature.
Shiva receives financial backing from high-profile activist groups such as the Center for Food Safety, which shares offices with her in Washington. Among her most controversial talking points is her false claim that there was no hunger in India prior to the Green Revolution. The truth is almost 180 degrees the opposite, as the Green Revolution, marked in part by the introduction of synthetic chemical fertilizers and pesticides enable massive increases in food production. A recent review of the evidence shows, “the production of cereal crops tripled during this period, with only a 30% increase in land area cultivated.” Shiva also blames the Green Revolution for increasing poverty, indebtedness and despair among farmers. Her notorious allegation that the introduction of insect-resistant GMO crops in India led many farmers to commit suicide has been evaluated and dismissed as inaccurate. Shiva is also a fierce opponent of so-called Golden Rice, a crop engineered to combat vitamin A deficiency in developing countries.
In response to the scheduling of her two talks at Stanford and UC Santa Cruz, 39 scientists from around the world co-authored an open letter to both universities protesting the invitations. The signatories told the GLP that their aim is to alert the events’ organizers, participants and attendees to the numerous falsehoods in Shiva’s philosophy. The letter, reproduced below in full, blasts Shiva for her “use of anti-scientific rhetoric to support unethical positions.” Neither university has scheduled a scientist to present the evidence-based case for crop biotechnology." geneticliteracyproject.org/2020/01/14/39-biotech-experts-open-letter-protests-anti-gmo-activist-vandana-shivas-anti-science-talks-at-stanford-and-uc-santa-cruz/
i do not buy any processed food, its all non food crap
Both should be put on.