Thank you so much for promoting our game! Your support means the world to us. As a small indie dev team, we are so grateful! To join the adventure of All Things DnD inside of LootQuest follow this short instruction: 1. Play through the tutorial real quick 2. Enter your hometown 3. Talk to the "Wise man" marked with a book and a speech bubble as icon 4. Engage in the "Tale of All Things DnD" 5. Fight your way through and hunt for the treasure Good luck on your adventures, Nils & Felix from LootQuest
While I'm immensely wary around evil characters (alignment-speaking), even as a pally I don't automatically assume that an evil race means evil character, and am willing to help encourage a better path if they are in trouble.
I play a lawful evil character in a campaign I'm in. Who in fact is a devil, he's actually a rather chill dude who just wants to have fun, but embraces the whole necessary evil side of things when it comes to getting things done, since cant make an omelette without cracking a few eggs. The important thing is to keep in mind even then, just how far is too far in regards to the other characters and how they'd respond.
I have a feeling this would have been one of those paladins who would have had a conniption if he saw a tiefling or half-orc paladin. Like, any "monstrous" race in the party has to be put down in their zeal.
Stories like this are why I believe Paladin is the hardest class to rp, because you need to find a healthy middle between a righteous warrior and a cooperative party member who works with others who don’t share their views or alignment. I often see players fall into self righteousness justifying being antagonistic because it’s the will of their god or go 180 and basically play like a murderhobo with no regards to their oath
I play a minotaur oath conquest paladin. Outside of combat, he is the chillest guy but cross his friends or threaten an innocent he will fight you. The moment combat is over or the opponent chooses not to fight he won't do anything to you
@@greatkhanjr5618 you know a party member in a campaign we’re Im a player is playing a Minotaur barbarían oath of conquest paladin I love how he rp his Minotaur but he leans more in the barbarian than in the paladin
paladins arent that hard to play, at least not in current editions, previously they where a nightmare due to the aligment and the way it clashed so heavily with others. Now days its more of a problem of people tinking that just because they are a paladin they are morally superior to everyone. Most players seem to tink that they have moral highground on any argument and anyone saying the contrary its wrong, stupid or evil, it makes it worse that not that many DMs actually put consequences behind this actions and the players justkeep doing watever they want
To be fair. The very concept of the class would mean people would find it difficult not to slide into Fundamentalist behavior. It preys on the more primal part to human psyche, I'm sure you understand.
Happens a lot with paladins. Especially people new to the game or new to playing paladins. RP is fine but not if it messes with other player's rp or disrupts the game. Sometimes, the paladin just needs to deal with evil in the party to keep the game going.
But why? (Why always paladin I mean. It works in both ways.) I played a paladin. Twice. And both times it resulted in PvP. Cause, sorry, but I also want to RP. And if you start to talk shit about the goddess of my char he will warn you several times. And then just bonk you with his mace. Same with torture and killing (and then reviving and torturing again) of innocent person. Upd. Though in this story pal indeed acted as piece of you know what.
@@ДобрыйХаосит-х6ф I wouldn't say you are in the wrong, but a much more productive solution is communicating your needs and attitudes to your fellow player, so you could both set your expectations and boundaries: any in-game course of action will be much smoother from this point on
@@ДобрыйХаосит-х6ф I'm in agreement with you. In just about every single case, evil characters are the primary instigators for either PvP or something very close to it. I'm fine with letting others RP (I'm sometimes left as the only one who initiates any kind of RP when no one steps up), but I'm always wary of evil ones. That being said however, I'm also a big fan of characters that are commonly thought of as evil that make a turnaround and go for a more good route in a game, and am willing to give them a chance.
@@ДобрыйХаосит-х6ф and people like you are why horror stories like this keep happening. That's all the reason "why" a decent person could possibly need.
@@Dragon359 Heh. I once played as NE goliath pal. And yes he was evil, so he doesn't care about anyone but himself and will of his goddess. But he anyway helped everyone. Why? Because goliaths love challenges, so... "Some spirit terrorises the forest? Where? Undead? Banshee even> Oho! Good foe! DRAGON?! Ah. Artificial. Anyway, show the way."
Hey atdd (hope you don’t mind the nickname)but I was wondering if you could possibly maybe do the dnd story I went through when I was little it was my first and most memorable game I ever played played, and I’d love to see it brought to life again by your story telling just once more to be able to look back on that memory and moment in time and see it brought to life once more,I’ll truly never forget that moment but I really just want to experience it once again, and I believe that if anyone can do it it’s you because all of your videos have so much life in the stories that you tell of others experiences In dnd.
I haven't clicked on one of these in a looooong time. Seeing the old animation for the DM I automatically associated it with the tons of times I'd hear the former voice over. Maybe change it? Especially with such a drastic sound change, it's like seeing Sonic and Tails while hearing Team Rocket. That was someone else, not you.
Daemon by original definition is a being higher than a mortal. Some contexts will have this as spirits in general even the spirits of mortals, but otherwise it is anything from a nature spirit to the creator of the universe. Most settings that will use Daemons as something seperate from Demons will have them as any non-mortal spiritual entity that isn't a Demi-god or higher existance, even if they might get up to that level of power dependent on specifics for an individual.
not to be bad, but what happened to the original reader. He had so much passion when it came to reading the stories out. Not saying the new guy is bad(he has good cadence) but did the original VA quit or something? Genuinely curious.
Last time i played an evil character, he was lawful evil, and i played him as a pragmatic yet cold utilitarian. Would the cost of someone outweigh the reward for saving them? Their loss. Would while he was a bit of an unlikeable character in universe, the players enjoyed him. Eventually he became less "beurocrat" and more campy. (I even borrowed a couple emet-selch lines for my character)
I think _you're_ the one who didn't hear something correctly. It had nothing to do with a miscommunication. The douche immediately grasped for other reasons to hate the character, such as it being overpowered, as soon as the group pointed out the "miscommunication," which proves the hatred went deeper than just not liking a character's race.
Honestly its stuff like this that always reminds me not to make a justice paladin and make a paladin whos trying to change so they can relate to those around them. For a example a criminal who becomes a paladin but is dealing with their past.
Alot of things here the Paladin did wrong, but I feel like a miscommunication error is on the DM's part. Daemon? Demon? And they still sound similar in the description. If I was the DM I would have retconned the Paladin being beheaded, tell Paladin no more PvP and give him the choice to continue.
To continue on with my last thought though, before realizing miscommunication, as DM I would have nipped the conflict in the bud the moment it arose. I feel not just an error, but DM is 75% of the blame for things spiraling the way it did. No one comes out of this smelling sweet.
I'm sorry Y'all, the tides have turned. With this new narrator the Drive to continue the praise of "Yirbel Lives" feels moot. Like I might as well referencing something from an entirely different channel. The vibe isn't right. That said i am getting more immersed in how this new one describes things...perhaps I need a new trend to utter throughout the journey of this new voice. Hmmmm 6:00 this man's trying to die!
So the entire party is at fault, but all blame is placed on Paladin’s player. They didn’t properly communicate. He clearly was confused with the foul beast comments & likely said demon a few times which were dropped from this telling. It would’ve been more in character to immediately attack on meeting, but the player was likely trying to justify why he’d adventure with a vile, evil beast…when he could no longer justify, he attacked. Instead of pausing & the DM ensuring lack of player knowledge that the character likely would have, they instead let him play his character correctly, given the misunderstanding, and then rejoiced in his character’s death. Kinda pathetic. Unless the narrator left something out, I’m very much in disagreement on this. As the group clearly learned afterward that it was based on confusion/OOC misunderstanding, decent people would’ve retconned, maybe making it a dream, maybe a vision of his deity to teach him the difference; instead, the “vile creature” turned out to be a vile creature ensuring a kill & the evil party members supporting the decision of permanent-death. Narrator should’ve noted the Paladin had been mislead into joining an evil party from the start. When I gamed, good characters would have to justify why they’d let monster races in their class or why they’d let anyone with known evil acts get away with it. Monster race characters would have trouble in neutral/good race areas & the others would have problems if they tried to go to a stronghold of the monster-character’s race. Even if a monster character had a backstory where he maybe saved a village so the villagers grew to accept it, there would always be a few villagers who didn’t agree and the next village over, let alone the nearest town, wouldn’t have the same feelings.
Paladin's player sounds a lot like a type who wants to smite people irl for not belonging to his own religious views. Also... A daemon or daimon is a guiding spirit. Not demon-related.
I have plenty of paladin characters, and I always know better than to roleplay them in a way that screws with everyone else's characters, let alone the session. Mostly because I don't like role-playing a self-righteous asshole and would rather play as a paladin who thinks like a person and not let his oath and religion dictate every little thing.
Thank you so much for promoting our game! Your support means the world to us. As a small indie dev team, we are so grateful!
To join the adventure of All Things DnD inside of LootQuest follow this short instruction:
1. Play through the tutorial real quick
2. Enter your hometown
3. Talk to the "Wise man" marked with a book and a speech bubble as icon
4. Engage in the "Tale of All Things DnD"
5. Fight your way through and hunt for the treasure
Good luck on your adventures,
Nils & Felix from LootQuest
While I'm immensely wary around evil characters (alignment-speaking), even as a pally I don't automatically assume that an evil race means evil character, and am willing to help encourage a better path if they are in trouble.
I once played with this one guy that was 100% against evils characters
I play a lawful evil character in a campaign I'm in.
Who in fact is a devil, he's actually a rather chill dude who just wants to have fun, but embraces the whole necessary evil side of things when it comes to getting things done, since cant make an omelette without cracking a few eggs.
The important thing is to keep in mind even then, just how far is too far in regards to the other characters and how they'd respond.
I have a feeling this would have been one of those paladins who would have had a conniption if he saw a tiefling or half-orc paladin. Like, any "monstrous" race in the party has to be put down in their zeal.
Well, they kinda do...
Stories like this are why I believe Paladin is the hardest class to rp, because you need to find a healthy middle between a righteous warrior and a cooperative party member who works with others who don’t share their views or alignment. I often see players fall into self righteousness justifying being antagonistic because it’s the will of their god or go 180 and basically play like a murderhobo with no regards to their oath
I play a minotaur oath conquest paladin. Outside of combat, he is the chillest guy but cross his friends or threaten an innocent he will fight you. The moment combat is over or the opponent chooses not to fight he won't do anything to you
@@greatkhanjr5618 you know a party member in a campaign we’re Im a player is playing a Minotaur barbarían oath of conquest paladin I love how he rp his Minotaur but he leans more in the barbarian than in the paladin
@@narutofror nice.
paladins arent that hard to play, at least not in current editions, previously they where a nightmare due to the aligment and the way it clashed so heavily with others. Now days its more of a problem of people tinking that just because they are a paladin they are morally superior to everyone. Most players seem to tink that they have moral highground on any argument and anyone saying the contrary its wrong, stupid or evil, it makes it worse that not that many DMs actually put consequences behind this actions and the players justkeep doing watever they want
To be fair.
The very concept of the class would mean people would find it difficult not to slide into Fundamentalist behavior.
It preys on the more primal part to human psyche, I'm sure you understand.
There was no miscommunication there. He thought he was doing the right thing and he wasn't.
This makes me sad as someone that plays mostly Drow, followers of Eilistraee
The auto-generated subtitles capitalized "Among Us"
Just pointing that out
When in the video
@@ThefifthBishopofGord near the end
Pretty … heh … SUS
I miss subtitles in these, i understand english but i enjoy reading along
@@MaindexOmega saaaame
Video starts at 1:20
Happens a lot with paladins. Especially people new to the game or new to playing paladins. RP is fine but not if it messes with other player's rp or disrupts the game. Sometimes, the paladin just needs to deal with evil in the party to keep the game going.
But why? (Why always paladin I mean. It works in both ways.) I played a paladin. Twice. And both times it resulted in PvP. Cause, sorry, but I also want to RP. And if you start to talk shit about the goddess of my char he will warn you several times. And then just bonk you with his mace.
Same with torture and killing (and then reviving and torturing again) of innocent person.
Upd. Though in this story pal indeed acted as piece of you know what.
@@ДобрыйХаосит-х6ф I wouldn't say you are in the wrong, but a much more productive solution is communicating your needs and attitudes to your fellow player, so you could both set your expectations and boundaries: any in-game course of action will be much smoother from this point on
@@ДобрыйХаосит-х6ф I'm in agreement with you. In just about every single case, evil characters are the primary instigators for either PvP or something very close to it. I'm fine with letting others RP (I'm sometimes left as the only one who initiates any kind of RP when no one steps up), but I'm always wary of evil ones. That being said however, I'm also a big fan of characters that are commonly thought of as evil that make a turnaround and go for a more good route in a game, and am willing to give them a chance.
@@ДобрыйХаосит-х6ф and people like you are why horror stories like this keep happening. That's all the reason "why" a decent person could possibly need.
@@Dragon359 Heh. I once played as NE goliath pal. And yes he was evil, so he doesn't care about anyone but himself and will of his goddess. But he anyway helped everyone. Why? Because goliaths love challenges, so... "Some spirit terrorises the forest? Where? Undead? Banshee even> Oho! Good foe! DRAGON?! Ah. Artificial. Anyway, show the way."
I had a feeling that the reason the paladin was being so antagonistic was because he misunderstood the name Damon.
Is there a link to this Damon Homebrew? I'm curious?
Been a bit since I've watched an All things. Always enjoy the stories. I'm curious though when/why they changed the voice.
To quote Lord Beerus from DragonBall: "Nobody preaching about justice is ever a good guy."
Hey atdd (hope you don’t mind the nickname)but I was wondering if you could possibly maybe do the dnd story I went through when I was little it was my first and most memorable game I ever played played, and I’d love to see it brought to life again by your story telling just once more to be able to look back on that memory and moment in time and see it brought to life once more,I’ll truly never forget that moment but I really just want to experience it once again, and I believe that if anyone can do it it’s you because all of your videos have so much life in the stories that you tell of others experiences In dnd.
I miss the animations. Took a while fir this narrator's voice to grow on me, and i still miss the old guy, but it's all things DnD!!!
Is this one real? I won't stay unless he is.
While I miss them too. The "animations" were more like gifs than actual animations tbh.
I haven't clicked on one of these in a looooong time. Seeing the old animation for the DM I automatically associated it with the tons of times I'd hear the former voice over. Maybe change it? Especially with such a drastic sound change, it's like seeing Sonic and Tails while hearing Team Rocket. That was someone else, not you.
Daemon by original definition is a being higher than a mortal. Some contexts will have this as spirits in general even the spirits of mortals, but otherwise it is anything from a nature spirit to the creator of the universe. Most settings that will use Daemons as something seperate from Demons will have them as any non-mortal spiritual entity that isn't a Demi-god or higher existance, even if they might get up to that level of power dependent on specifics for an individual.
In some lore Daemons are also Demi-God level spirits infact Baphomet the irl one is actually a Daemon but is a being of Balance and Equality.
not to be bad, but what happened to the original reader. He had so much passion when it came to reading the stories out. Not saying the new guy is bad(he has good cadence) but did the original VA quit or something? Genuinely curious.
Last time i played an evil character, he was lawful evil, and i played him as a pragmatic yet cold utilitarian. Would the cost of someone outweigh the reward for saving them? Their loss. Would while he was a bit of an unlikeable character in universe, the players enjoyed him. Eventually he became less "beurocrat" and more campy. (I even borrowed a couple emet-selch lines for my character)
Look for a special edition time magazine: Dungeons & Dragons-the game that changed the world
The two are as similar as their names, I personally remember them as DAYmon (light = good) and just plain old demon (obviously evil)
Just came back after a while. Miss the old voice, but stories still good.
I think _you're_ the one who didn't hear something correctly. It had nothing to do with a miscommunication. The douche immediately grasped for other reasons to hate the character, such as it being overpowered, as soon as the group pointed out the "miscommunication," which proves the hatred went deeper than just not liking a character's race.
Honestly its stuff like this that always reminds me not to make a justice paladin and make a paladin whos trying to change so they can relate to those around them. For a example a criminal who becomes a paladin but is dealing with their past.
Could you be a postal worker subclass and be a Mailer Daemon?
Who in their right mind would make a pc for another player to kill?
Alot of things here the Paladin did wrong, but I feel like a miscommunication error is on the DM's part. Daemon? Demon? And they still sound similar in the description. If I was the DM I would have retconned the Paladin being beheaded, tell Paladin no more PvP and give him the choice to continue.
To continue on with my last thought though, before realizing miscommunication, as DM I would have nipped the conflict in the bud the moment it arose. I feel not just an error, but DM is 75% of the blame for things spiraling the way it did. No one comes out of this smelling sweet.
I'm sorry Y'all, the tides have turned. With this new narrator the Drive to continue the praise of "Yirbel Lives" feels moot. Like I might as well referencing something from an entirely different channel. The vibe isn't right. That said i am getting more immersed in how this new one describes things...perhaps I need a new trend to utter throughout the journey of this new voice. Hmmmm 6:00 this man's trying to die!
Dude what happened to the previous guy / voice actor ???
So the entire party is at fault, but all blame is placed on Paladin’s player. They didn’t properly communicate. He clearly was confused with the foul beast comments & likely said demon a few times which were dropped from this telling. It would’ve been more in character to immediately attack on meeting, but the player was likely trying to justify why he’d adventure with a vile, evil beast…when he could no longer justify, he attacked. Instead of pausing & the DM ensuring lack of player knowledge that the character likely would have, they instead let him play his character correctly, given the misunderstanding, and then rejoiced in his character’s death. Kinda pathetic. Unless the narrator left something out, I’m very much in disagreement on this. As the group clearly learned afterward that it was based on confusion/OOC misunderstanding, decent people would’ve retconned, maybe making it a dream, maybe a vision of his deity to teach him the difference; instead, the “vile creature” turned out to be a vile creature ensuring a kill & the evil party members supporting the decision of permanent-death. Narrator should’ve noted the Paladin had been mislead into joining an evil party from the start.
When I gamed, good characters would have to justify why they’d let monster races in their class or why they’d let anyone with known evil acts get away with it. Monster race characters would have trouble in neutral/good race areas & the others would have problems if they tried to go to a stronghold of the monster-character’s race. Even if a monster character had a backstory where he maybe saved a village so the villagers grew to accept it, there would always be a few villagers who didn’t agree and the next village over, let alone the nearest town, wouldn’t have the same feelings.
Some people just suck at this game
Or it could be *MATT DAMON:*
Sounds like another murder hobo
Came back because I really liked this channel but....AI narrator now so, unsubscribing.
Paladin's player sounds a lot like a type who wants to smite people irl for not belonging to his own religious views. Also... A daemon or daimon is a guiding spirit. Not demon-related.
I have plenty of paladin characters, and I always know better than to roleplay them in a way that screws with everyone else's characters, let alone the session. Mostly because I don't like role-playing a self-righteous asshole and would rather play as a paladin who thinks like a person and not let his oath and religion dictate every little thing.
Daemon is the first concept to be demonized by Christians and translated means soul, so technically both things are both.
Do we know what Happened to the old narrator he's ok right? I'm fine with the new narrator im just worried about the old one
84783 Luna Valley
As he goes on about this ad with vigorous efforts & the gameplay looks like a cheaper version of a Japanese game that’s only tap & attack 😂😂😂
Is this an actual voice actor or a bot?
Sounds like an actual dude to me :0
This is the actual person who makes and posts these videos. The VA we heard from all of the past videos dipped out for some reason.
No but really, what happened to the original narrator with the more nasily voice??
Your deception is not high enough to go unnoticed!
I've been gone for about a year, what happened to your voice??
They switched VA's if I am correct
Puberty bro
Did I hear that right? Your dm takes away agency by forcing intimidation rolls between players?
No? Where did you get the idea that the DM forced the Spellblade to do an Intimidation roll?
@@Taygon45 When he said he did. Pay attention.
@@gustaafargoan I did. I did not hear at any point that the DM said they ordered an intimidation roll. Can you time stamp it?
@@Taygon45 nope. I heard it. You do the research.
@@gustaafargoan So you're just gonna dig your head in the sand and claim you heard it instead of time stamping it?