the more you listen to Jabzy repeating their desire to recreate some vague medieval kingdom, the more you can't tell if they are meming some good EU4 contents.
@@cjware316 Europa Universalis 4, a grand strategy video game by Paradox that focuses on the period between 1444 to 1836 and lets you rewrite history in any way you want.
I like that there is no BS intro and begging for subscribers and likes. Just straight to the point. Straight to the content. I also like the illustrations of different people. The Danish looks Danish, the French looks French, etc.
I hate youtubers who say “but before we get started make sure drop a like, subscribe and check me out on patreon blah blah blah” when you just want them to cut the crap
@@odiadordeisrael It depended, for some slavic states (like Croatia) I agree that he just adapted to politics. But for western and nordic countries (Britain, France, Danemark/Sweden/Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerlands...) he had a rather fixed opinion during the entirety of the party existence. He even had kind of a classification. The most contradictory parts were really in the East (some Balkan countries, Hungary, and that hilarious part about Ukrainian women). He needed some of those countries, badly, yet theorically for the nazis slavs were the same of jews and sub-saharan blacks, inferiors to be exterminated. I think he just "needed" to change that stance, at least temporarily, for political purpose.
@@xenotypos The Slavs were always considered Aryan just not all nations that lived in the Slavic domain were pure enough aryan aka mixed with non Slavic elements . In other words the pure Slavic was as aryan as the Germanic but the Regions the Slavs lived in were infused with a variety of non aryans( theoretically) incursions historically to denote some Slavs nations as often insufficiently pure enough aryan to be wholly included. Though most populations were partially going to be included as citizens ( thus aryan)50% -60% of Baltic’s , 35% of Ukrainians , 90% of Czechs, etc etc .
It's hilarious how contradictory the Nazis were on stuff like this 'These guys? Obviously Slavs. These dudes right next to them? Germans! Why? Cause we said so!"
You mean all the hateful bullshit he based on lies, misunderstandings and thin air WEREN'T actually logically consistent when you looked at it with even vague braincells?
As a follower for over 6 years now, it amazes me how much your content has evolved. It also somehow manages to scratch every shower thought question I’ve unknowingly had about history!!
Have you read Otto Wagner's "memoirs of a confidant". Quite interesting how in 1936 Hitler was talking abut setting up a Greater European Union with a customs union with Poland, Czechoslovakia and everyone else in Europe. Obviously 3 years later there'd be war, so basically I think Hitler's "plans" for the future changed every week. This video is a nice compilation, though probably far from definitive of all the various writings German leaders made about possible future configurations.
People are not wring in saying he made stuff up, but one could also say he was trying to adapt best to a growing pool of his own knowledge and understanding of the world. Suppose he didn't become delirious and full of health complications later in life, then he may have tried different approaches for getting ceasefires between different factions.
As an Irishman I love that you mentioned how Fine Gael (who are currently in government at the moment) were founded by fascists it's also why you'll hear Irish people refer to them as blue shirts given their links with Eoin O'Duffy when they were founded in the 30s
@@burtonkephart6239 because as an npc, he is mandated to mention fascists as much as possible, even when their combined atrocities compare to any left wing party or agenda.
I find it quite interesting how hitler is this despicable human being but he also seemed to be the tamed one of his circle. Gobels and himler seemed to be much, much worse than him
Because they were worse. Historical propaganda portrays Hitler as the cruelest, even if that's not entirely true. You can't be too curious because you'll immediately be called a Nazi or simply anti-Semitic.
Literally the main reason why people don't want to kill Hitler when he was a baby. A more extreme version of him would take power (assuming they also have the charisma of Hitler), and would probably be more strategic than him based on previous war experiences and whether or not they were a part of the military to which most of the Nazi Party (Freikorps members) was.
It's like Germany didn't understand the British at all. Britain doesn't like hegemony in Europe full stop, doesn't matter if they are the same race, different race or different species.
No the Brits don't really make any sense, "bro we literally want to ally with you, trade with you, protect your empire, why tf are you trying to wage a war that is ruinous to yourself ?"
@@generaladvance5812 there's a difference between an anti-British hegemon like Napoleon and what Hitler wanted which was a pro-British hegemon. The alternative was what we got, a communist and American split Europe with a ruined Britain.
@@AFGuidesHD Britian didn't want a hegemony in Europe fall stop. A powerful country would threaten the balance of power what Britian wanted to keep after the Congress of Vienna. Even before this, Britan fought wars aganinst a Powerful france for centuries, an ally can quickly become a rivial and this wasn't on the table. A powerful European what threatens the balance of power will always threaten britians interests, e.i. The 7 years war, Napoleonic war, Crimean War, Both World wars.
There already is a video on Japan's ambitions: ruclips.net/video/yYlEhJRSUq8/видео.html. And it sounds like the next video will be on Germany's ambitions outside of Europe.
I am looking forward to the next video on this, I hope you’ll do more and maybe talk about Germanys goals for other continents. Also, I am curious, what sources are you using for info?
@@Obrez1 😂😂😂ok . They control access to Black Sea n Mediterranean , they play everybody ( US, Russia , Israel , Europe , Africa etc) they helped goad Russia and Germany into ww1, mass murder of Greek and Armenian Christians ( Armenian genocide -still haven’t admitted it, hey young Turks !) etc etc . They mucked up the whole Middle East causing unrest and half of todays problems there .the ottomans were a authoritarian empire that enslaved many and subjected even more
Seems like flipping was the better deal for Italy. Only lost the colonies and Istria instead of half the country. Mussolini should have stayed with his original distrust of the Germans and joined the Stressa front. There wouldn't have been a WW2.
Well, the only reason he didn't was Britain and France wouldn't support him in his empire building. He basically just said "fuck it, I don't like Germany ruling, but at least I'll get a bigger slice this way." Plus Britain and France were letting Germany push so much he felt they lost sight of their plans.
I see this abjection all the time, "WW2 wouldn't happen". Of course it would. I severely doubt Italy was the reason Germany was so confident to invade Poland and without Italy, best case scenario is that the war starts sometime in 1940 instead. People keep throwing scenarios around but WW2 is an imperative in the same way that WW3 is. Even if it happens 3000 years from now, there will be a WW3 just like there would have been a WW2 even if you removed Italy from the equation.
Most of Germany’s claims on Italy took place after they had already flipped. Notice the reference to Italian treachery. Furthermore, the claims expressed in these videos are the MAXIMUM claims of these nations. In no way could all of these claims been satisfied.
WW2 is still happening in some form, although if it's UK, France and Italy vs Germany it would be a one-sided conflict. Who knows, maybe the Nazis would have maintained their friendship with the Soviets in lieu of losing Italy, leading to an unholy alliance between the two?
@Keiki Haniyasushin he just a useful idiot for your cause. Hell he does not even understand that he is racially speaking a subhuman by the logic of National Socialism
While I’m not aware of the Soviets having any designs to expand farther west then East Germany it would still be cool to see the Soviets plans for Cold War expansion
there litteraly werent any, there was only a insane plan "7 days to the river rhine" where a swift blitzkrieg operation would crush west germany in 7 days, probably leading to the unificacion of germany under east germany.
1) 1812 France lead by Napoleon invaded Russia 2) 1914 Germany invaded Russia 3) 1918 US, England Japan 10+ or 20+ (differrment sources) invaded Russia during Revolution 4) 1941 Germany invaded USSR 5) 1989 US EU NATO secretly helped USSR implosion + break up. Who invades whom??
I'm waiting with excitement part 3, I'm curious if it's true that they truly had designs in America, not only the US or Canada but Latin America, what would they want the continent to be.
Nothing serious. Like, there were some table talks that were never a part of the official policy, just wishful thinking that were completely void of reason and realism. But essentially, everything outside of the Generalplan Ost was not official and not a priority. Especially for places like Americas and Africa. Generalplan Ost was already extremely optimistic and if successful would take the entire century if not more to be finished and would eat all the time, resources, money and focus that Germany could muster. Even various topics within the rest of Europe were kinda non-defined (as you can see in the video) as Germans really did not care that much. It was mostly an afterthought. The priority was eastern expansion and reorganization of the order in the east. Everything else was not really planned, but had more of a "we'll cross that bridge when we come to it" vibe. But sure, you could probably dig out some table talk about Germans planning planetary domination and expanding their influence into space as well. But those were nothing but a simple table talk and fantasies that no one really took seriously. Simply because even their main goal and reason for starting the war was already outside of their scope of possible. It made little sense to fantasize much about Americas, Africa etc.
I don’t know about what they would’ve done with North America, but I did see articles on how Germany planned to expand trade in South America, in the hopes of becoming their biggest trade partner, and achieving economic hegemony. They even planned to divide the continent into different countries under German control. Roosevelt presented a map concerning this, and while the map was a forgery, it was based off a real map to get South America into the New Order.
European Confederation”, drafted in 1943 under Foreign Minister, Ribbentrop, he wanted a European Union. Maybe not what we have today, but some type of European federation.
the aryans are and were a superior culture and race. only the chinese/japanese are somewhat comparable. but at the time of hitler it was not understood fully, or rather it was forgotten, that the slavs, the rus and ukrainians especially, were aryans. partly from the initial group of aryans/indoeuropeans, and later formed and united and guided by nordic aryans, in the viking age, leading to kievan-rus, which later tumbled the step hordes. after that, however, they replaced and intermixed with the steppe hordes, and when the russian empire replaced the mongol one, they gradually because less european and chose/had to adapt to the role of "the world island" geopolitical player, and not the european or the rimworld player. after all it is geography that shapes cultures, that in terns shapes genetics and "longterm/inborn culture". hence why most cultures are valid and competitive, in their specialized inviroment... were it not for the joker-card: technology/anti-biological evolution. which is the underlying course for all bullshit in the world. that much have been known from the start. but its and armsrace and an opioid both, so who are to lower their gun first?
The tiny pupils all alone on the eye. And the eyebrows... Omg I love the tiny and isolated pupils..so cute..A bridge between realism..and South Park eyes
If I remember right, Hitler's entire plan was to just focus on the East. If Britain and France hadn't cared about Poland, then WW2 as we know it would not have happened. It would have just been more of a Nazi-Soviet war than anything else, because Hitler surprisingly cared very little for the West and just wanted his own empire out of the way from everyone elses. I suppose it helps that everything East of Moscow was completely uncontested outside of the Soviet Union, so if they had conquered them, then they would have no competition or threats (except maybe the Japanese but considering Hitler called them Honorary Aryans, I'm sure there would have been some sort of compromise)
Can you give me at least one reference to the fact that he wasn’t planning a war against the west? I am currently researching the subject for a school project.
@@harry3615 that's not true. Hitler wanted to punish the west for the embarrassment of Versailles treaty. He was always craving for France and Britain and US. It was just a matter of time before he could attack them. If he was successful on Russians he would have unlimited resources for an offensive on the west side. Hitler was not trustworthy. His goal was to control the world by conquest
While what you said about the Hungary-Romania conflicts was true, its important to note that Hitler and some of his generals were impressed with the Hungarian Army at times, especially the performance of the Carpathian Group and the defence of the Árpád line. The only good thing they really said about the Romanians is that they contributed more men. The Romanians were criticized at the Seige of Odessa for using WW1 tactics. Further, Hitler distrusted the Latins, which included romanians. Antonescu was less radical than the very pro-german Iron Guard, so its possible that he would try to side with Italy in the Latin Bloc, bringing the romanian influenced Balkand with it. Hungary had no designes on the lower Balkans and had abandoned its claims on Croatia. This would make them much more cooperative ally. On the other hand, the Hungarian fascist parties were also anti-german, so they would have likely closed themselves off like romania did in the Warsaw pact. To me, the choice is such a tossup that Hitler would likely let the two duke it out and side with the winner
This comment sounds like a classic mad Hungarian only because Hitler and the Na*is wrote bad things about the Hungarians but spoke greatly about the leader Ion Antonescu and how they would crush Hungary if a war broke up after WW2. It is true that Ion Antonescu fought the Iron Guard who were Pro-Germans but you forgot to mention that Hitler supported it, and allowed Iron Guard officials and Politicians to take refuge in Germany.
Let me guess.. you're a hungarian 🤣 You need to write a whole essay full half-thruts well chosen to defend your nationalistic pride, but lowkey you know that if Germany had won it would have been in Antonescu's favore and your country probably would have been annexed.
@@InAeternumRomaMater You're the one that sounds mad. I made points for why Hitler could have preferred either one. He also said that "[Antonescu] is a born soldier, but his misfortune is having romanians under his command." He didn't like either country, and pretending that he liked Romania makes no sense. Also why would I be mad? There's no reason for me to want my country to be a Nazi puppet. I'm just discussing historical events. Why do you like someone that basically raped your country and let nearly every neighbor take a bite out?
@@andrasbeke3012 And weirdly, Hitler wanted to put Ion Antonescu in Command of the Stalingrad divisions. Herman Hoths 4th division (German) would have been changed with the Romanian 4th division under Constantinescu Claps and Dumitrescus 3rd Division (Romanian), and Paulus 6th division (German) would have been under the command of a Romanian Marshal. Of course this didn't happen because Stalingrad didn't fall, but Hitler still wanted the Romanians to be in control of Stalingrad who saw History's bloodiest battle. And in your comment you did try to put in a way that Hitler talked greatly about the Hungarian Carpathian division and the Árpád line and came with "how Romanians were criticised at the Siege of Oddessa" and also how they (you probably meant the Na*is) wrote the only good thing about the Romanians was how they contributed with more men, but you didn't write where you got those quotes.
really capitalizing on trending Kanye lol. I'm going to go back and watch your scramble for Africa stuff again. I've taken in enough WW2 history over the last few years
With regards to Spain, some members of the basque nationalist party in exile in France sought accommodation with the Germans and there were talks of establishing an independent basque republic on the grounds that they were more aryan than the rest of Spaniards. In fact a few years ago a bit of an scandal happened because some tapes were found apparently of a few German officers going through the Basque Country and investigating its culture and also the names of several high ranking basque nationalist party members was discovered. Interestingly enough, this was not the case with the catalonian nationalists, as while the left wing section sided with the republicans and were the ones in control of the region along with the anarchists during the civil war, most of the right wing which belonged for the most part to the high catalan burgoise collaborated with the nationalists during the spanish civil war, giving them important financial aid and representation in the exterior, receiving in return their land and industrial properties seized during the civil war and many of them would become important members of the francoist state (with many joining the Falange despite its centralist positions) so there really wasn't any attempt on that side to seek an agreement with the germans.
Also there’s a lot to be said about Hitlers view on Spain and the Spaniards. Like many of his views of other nations, his opinions could swing 180 depending on the mood he was in. After Franco “made” Hitler to reject him into the Axis, there was talk of still carrying out an invasion of Spain itself for taking Gibraltar, but when Hitler caught wind of it he refused on the grounds that if Napoleon failed to conquer Spain, that meant that Spaniards had a spirit of resistance and guerrilla warfare that would be a logistical and military nightmare for the German army. Other times he would call them lazy and oriental.
@@silverhost9782 Kaiser, we cant defeat France: lets go over Belgium than ... GB lets declare war. Mein Führer, we cant get Danzig by democracy and Poland doesnt accept German land, which got stolen 1919, but Germany is rdy to give up. Most people in Danzig were German and the Königsberg region suffered, because Poland forbid Germany to tranport goods threw their land (Königsberg region was separated thanks to the victory powers 1919). Königsberg region suffers, delclaring war to Poland is justified ... what does GB do: declare war, which means half of the world is into war: why, because GB declared war extremly often or to quote Silverhost978: GBs empirte was the second biggest dick and thief in human history (mongol first).
That's not easily possible, all Axis nations had completing interests. I'm sure you can find someone on reddit who could theoretically make one, but they don't usually take commissions.
it wasn't really "Anglo" relations, it was quite literally Churchill-American relations, it's why Churchill is such a big hero in America. Before the half-American came along Britain was a rival of America, as America even during the war treated them like an enemy more than an ally. It's why the Germans were so confused as to why Britain preferred to be treated this way than ally with Germany against the Americans.
Well, we pretty much know what would have happened because the administrative documents for a post-war Europe exist. They were created by Hans Heinrich Lammers, Chief of the Reich Chancellery. What I like to imagine, is immediately following the collapse of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics through Operation Barbarossa and the end of the war in Europe, the victorious German/Axis soldiers return to their respective homelands to a hero’s welcome and with a new sense of pride and honor the likes of which the world has never seen before. With the war over, the Greater German Reich, the Republic of Finland, Kingdom of Romania, and Kingdom of Hungary all received colonies in the East. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics is carved up into pieces. The Baltic States become protectorates, while Ukraine and Russia proper up to the Ural Mountains become German colonies. While the exact extent of the colonies varies, the concept is pretty clear. The newly established Reichskommissariat Russland is to be governed by none other than Joseph Stalin with ϟA-Obergruppenführer Siegfried Kasche as Reichskommissar. Adolf Hitler had always admired Joseph Stalin and hoped that with the defeat of the Soviet Union he would rule by his side. Believing his brutal methods and policies are necessary to keep the peoples of Eastern Europe in line. Having reportedly stated: “Stalin knows better than anyone else, how to handle the Russians.” But Slavic People would not have had many rights and would be treated as second-rate citizens at best, slaves at worst. In the west, the Kingdom of Norway, Kingdom of Denmark, the Low Countries, and France would regain their independence with the withdrawal of the Wehrmacht, but with pro-German governments and there are also territorial changes for France and Belgium. Luxembourg was annexed by Germany. Greece and the Balkans would also regain their independence but would be under more firm German control compared to Western Europe. Citizens from western countries would be partially resettled in lands in Poland now vacated of Poles (also resettled). This consists mainly of Dutch and Belgian people but Danish and French volunteers also welcome as well. They would be given farmland and a farm in Poland. Gradually, a European Union would be created with Germany as the most powerful member state. Adolf Hitler wanted this Union to include all of Europe, including neutral nations, but he did not plan on invading any of them if they had refused to join. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland would officially not part of this Union but would be closely associated with it, obtaining most of its resources from its Empire while the Union acquires most of its resources from the former Soviet Union (European Russia). A European Army, Navy, and Air Force would be created, in which German would be the command language. Healthcare remains a national aspect with no plans for a larger European healthcare system. Certain aspects such as environmental laws and animal rights laws would be forced on all European countries. This Union would see the free movement of persons and goods, pretty much like the present Schengen Agreement. With the free movement of persons and goods, it would be possible to study abroad and find work abroad, pretty much like in the European Union today. The European economy would be a planned economy to a large extent with fixed wages and prices for a lot of goods. Studies are made about how much a bottle of wine should cost to make the bottle profitable and affordable at the same time, for example. Historically, currency was never clear. Some plans wanted to introduce the Reichsmark (ℛℳ) as the European currency, other plans called for fixed exchange rates with countries retaining their own currency.
Are you going to make a video on German colonial ambitions or not, because I am even more interested in nazi Germany after watching your videos and would like to see what they were planning for aftica and other continents
Hitler was a very, VERY stupid man and that's when he wasn't hopped up on enough coke to see god. You ever actually read his book? An author the man was not.
The definitions they used are arbitrary, withouta doubt. However, a truly scientific and universally true method to define a people has exited since the 90's... i.e. genomic sequences.
As a Romanian, this gives me mixed feelings. It would seem that my country would be markedly better off today if the Nazis won, but I can't quite reconcile that with the overall loss that humanity as a whole would suffer. It's better for the world at large that things turned out the way they did, but I doubt it's better for my country. Then again, Antonescu was mortal. What then, what after his death? Hitler didn't respect Romania, he respected Antonescu. More food for thought I guess.
I'm also Romanian, I would suggest you read the book 'Maresalul Ion Antonescu - o biografie' You will see there notes that are considered personal, like one of us texting someone and only 2 people would know the context. From what I can tell you without leaving a spoiler, We had the upper hand in getting everything we wanted, Hitler and SS were on our side since 1942, we could've taken back N Transylvania after the war and live as the small hegemon in the Balkans, but there is information about German retalion if we decided to go too further. Again, as a romanian I suggest you read books that cover personal notes of historical individuals, this is the best way to learn history and see exactly personal opinions :)
Fascinating! I find it amazing that some of these complex proposed divisions and solutions were still apparently being expounded by leaders within Germany even when to any objective viewer the War was already going so badly for them in 1943! P.S……I also enjoyed hearing the River Danube being “Da-noob” for the first time ever! 🤣
Dont wanna defend the germans they were terrible but they did not want to take over entire europe. They only really had beef with Poland and the Ussr. They then had to open up other fronts because France and the UK declared war on them.
@@hazzmati there is literally an hours worth of content on this video and the last one showing the serious plans to do much more they just never got the chance
@@hazzmati that's simply psuedo history. hitler was always gonna attack france, and they declared war in defense of their ally which hitler knew they'd do
Britain and France should've just let Germany take Poland and not declare war, then let Germany and Russia inevitably turn on each other and watch them fight it out.
Why would Greenland return to Denmark? Greenland was occupied preemptively by the US, not by the UK, and the US was never, ever going to leave even if the British had signed peace with Germany. The Danes asked the US to leave after WW2 in our timeline, and the US simply refused. If Denmark remained under German control, the US would have simply orchestrated an independence vote in Greenland and then signed a free association agreement or outright annexation. Given the horrors of Nazi rule, 99% of Greenlanders would've voted in favour voluntarily. The same applies to Iceland: the US wouldn't leave and Iceland still would've become a staunch US ally.
It's more than the Germans saw the English as the same as them racially, and as a group that was highly enterprising, successful and good at war. To Nazi eyes, the English were admirable due to the size of their empire, but the reasons why that empire came into being and the reasons why the nazis wanted one of their own were completely different. Hitler himself had to frequently deny that he had an inferiority complex towards them during speeches in the 1930s. The Nazis categorically showed that they misunderstood England/Britain at every turn during and before WW2 and this admiration they had was part of those misunderstandings. Interested to seeing a source for your final claim there.
@@silverhost9782 mein kamph where he praises how British ruled india. His reasons weren’t different, the difference really is what at least in Hitler’s mind he would’ve exterminated Slavs for German farmers while british reason to conquer india was to control trade and open markets for their own goods
@@zuesmaya8167 However, recent research (see several websites) that England killed 100 million? In India over 200 years, WITHOUT direct residential land grab. This was same tactic as used in Ireland, etc.
I love the fact that Hitler always compares other slavic ethnicities to Czechs and says that Czechs couldn't be germanized. Even though Czechs share the biggest amount of German DNA compared to other slavic nations hahaha
Its because contrary to popular belief the Nazis did not put race above everything. They did alliances based on pragmatism and politics just like any other empire in history.
@@silverhost9782 An horrible idea is giving a crazy country like the SU/Russia the opportunity to get better weapon like the nuklear bomb. Now we can do nothing, when the SU/Russia declares war on someone. Horrible was the need for the Brits to stay Europes number one: they destroyed themselfs and Europe. We could had an alliance, crush with Japan the USA and stay continent number one. Now we all fade away in the shadow of the USA and China: both got strong, because of the greedy Britains oh, and the USA destroys the whole world and will wipe out human kind. Hitler knew that: now we all live in the souless USA system, which will destroy us all.
@@sammybeutlin2763 Unfortunately, there were two major powers in Europe being run by lunatics. The one who shot first got beaten to death, whilst the other was left to die of his own accord 40 years later. Overall, could have been worse. I'm not going to respond to the rest of that unhinged nonsense because it doesn't really deserve a response though
Use your head mate, in an ideal world they would have done, but declaring war on the two most powerful European army nations is seriously not a good idea.
So Hitler was basically like "I dunno. I didn't think I'd get this far."
He didn’t think he’d have to fight the west
@@pels_stackedand if the west knew what we were doing we wouldn’t have fought at all
@@pels_stackedincorrect
@@jenghiskhan69 his whole plan was to go east
Germany all the way to the Pacific, because the east would try to kill or replace us. Now we're at war in Europe again thanks to the east.
the more you listen to Jabzy repeating their desire to recreate some vague medieval kingdom, the more you can't tell if they are meming some good EU4 contents.
Eu4 has only about 56 years of the medieval period. The game focus the Early modern period. Something like CK3 would be more appropriate.
@@someguysomeone3543 Extended Timeline
What is EU4?
@@cjware316 Europa Universalis 4, a grand strategy video game by Paradox that focuses on the period between 1444 to 1836 and lets you rewrite history in any way you want.
@@1HUSEINKAPETAN11821
“…creation of a Burgundian State.”
Oh no.
OmG fUnNi tNO rEfERenCE!!1!
I mean they got that stuff from somewhere ya know.
STRENG GEHEIM
No hope under the black sun.
Hail the nightmare! There is no hope under the black sun
Expect this to be monetized for 1 day and never again like last time lol. In seriousness though really appreciate the effort you put into these videos
Yes, two 36 min videos that will receive 0 ad money. Must be painful
@@LucidFL and probably god-tier amount of book-reading, research, drawing of the borders and characters went into it so it makes it even more tragic
I don’t think monetization was the main goal here. He gained a LOT of views which will fuel his other videos that are monetized
Very totalitarian actually... He's doing a great job.
I like that there is no BS intro and begging for subscribers and likes. Just straight to the point. Straight to the content.
I also like the illustrations of different people. The Danish looks Danish, the French looks French, etc.
I hate youtubers who say “but before we get started make sure drop a like, subscribe and check me out on patreon blah blah blah” when you just want them to cut the crap
@@Frogman69.. same here. I've gotten really good at fast forwarding that crap but its refreshing to not have to.
I rarely see that on history related channels
Same. I was shocked he jumped immediately into on.
Refreshing.
@@tomlxyz Now lots promote scams like established titles or Kamikoto knives.
What I concluded from this is that Hitler basically made up who was aryan and non-aryan as he went along
no he didn't
@@ottomeyer6928 Elaborate then
@@odiadordeisrael It depended, for some slavic states (like Croatia) I agree that he just adapted to politics. But for western and nordic countries (Britain, France, Danemark/Sweden/Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerlands...) he had a rather fixed opinion during the entirety of the party existence. He even had kind of a classification.
The most contradictory parts were really in the East (some Balkan countries, Hungary, and that hilarious part about Ukrainian women). He needed some of those countries, badly, yet theorically for the nazis slavs were the same of jews and sub-saharan blacks, inferiors to be exterminated. I think he just "needed" to change that stance, at least temporarily, for political purpose.
It also explains why he place the Italians so low despite being a German ally
@@xenotypos The Slavs were always considered Aryan just not all nations that lived in the Slavic domain were pure enough aryan aka mixed with non Slavic elements . In other words the pure Slavic was as aryan as the Germanic but the Regions the Slavs lived in were infused with a variety of non aryans( theoretically) incursions historically to denote some Slavs nations as often insufficiently pure enough aryan to be wholly included. Though most populations were partially going to be included as citizens ( thus aryan)50% -60% of Baltic’s , 35% of Ukrainians , 90% of Czechs, etc etc .
It's hilarious how contradictory the Nazis were on stuff like this
'These guys? Obviously Slavs. These dudes right next to them? Germans! Why? Cause we said so!"
You mean all the hateful bullshit he based on lies, misunderstandings and thin air WEREN'T actually logically consistent when you looked at it with even vague braincells?
As Natsoc, I agree.
@@weareeverywhere8851 I'm curious to know your thoughts on how to define identity, what YOU mean when you say "race", etc.
'Kill them all! Except the women, obviously as they are way too hot for them to not to be Germanic!'
@@Nero-ho6gt I don't even think he knows what to define race by. The irony of natsocialism.
As a follower for over 6 years now, it amazes me how much your content has evolved. It also somehow manages to scratch every shower thought question I’ve unknowingly had about history!!
Have you read Otto Wagner's "memoirs of a confidant". Quite interesting how in 1936 Hitler was talking abut setting up a Greater European Union with a customs union with Poland, Czechoslovakia and everyone else in Europe. Obviously 3 years later there'd be war, so basically I think Hitler's "plans" for the future changed every week. This video is a nice compilation, though probably far from definitive of all the various writings German leaders made about possible future configurations.
He lives in my heart
People are not wring in saying he made stuff up, but one could also say he was trying to adapt best to a growing pool of his own knowledge and understanding of the world.
Suppose he didn't become delirious and full of health complications later in life, then he may have tried different approaches for getting ceasefires between different factions.
Either that or all the propaganda is just disjointed and illiterate
For the people wanting to look him up, his name is Wagener, not Wagner.
Hitler began using methamphetamine in 1936. That might have played a role in his mind changing every couple hours
15:30 Jabzy can't help but laugh under his breath
Just clicked and he immediately starts explaining, keep it up man
I feel like a lot of these plans must have been conceived 5 beers into the night or something lmao
I share his dream he is the greatest superhero ever lived right up there with Batman and Elvis
@@georgeboehringer5530 careful george
@@georgeboehringer5530you like cowards ?
As an Irishman I love that you mentioned how Fine Gael (who are currently in government at the moment) were founded by fascists it's also why you'll hear Irish people refer to them as blue shirts given their links with Eoin O'Duffy when they were founded in the 30s
What’s your point
@@burtonkephart6239 no one likes them..
@@burtonkephart6239 because as an npc, he is mandated to mention fascists as much as possible, even when their combined atrocities compare to any left wing party or agenda.
Durr you sure showed him, durr
@@freeminded7 He's just your average Irishman. A worthless npc piece of shit island.
These videos are so fascinating! Thanks for the details, and I look forward to hearing about the "other bold plans" outside of the continent.
I find it quite interesting how hitler is this despicable human being but he also seemed to be the tamed one of his circle. Gobels and himler seemed to be much, much worse than him
Because they were worse. Historical propaganda portrays Hitler as the cruelest, even if that's not entirely true. You can't be too curious because you'll immediately be called a Nazi or simply anti-Semitic.
An authoritarian dreamer surrounded by extremists
Maybe he thought he was the rational one by being surrounded by worse people than himself.
Literally the main reason why people don't want to kill Hitler when he was a baby. A more extreme version of him would take power (assuming they also have the charisma of Hitler), and would probably be more strategic than him based on previous war experiences and whether or not they were a part of the military to which most of the Nazi Party (Freikorps members) was.
One small correction: Romania was compensated with Transnistria, since what you mention as Moldova was actually Bessarabia.
It's like Germany didn't understand the British at all. Britain doesn't like hegemony in Europe full stop, doesn't matter if they are the same race, different race or different species.
No the Brits don't really make any sense, "bro we literally want to ally with you, trade with you, protect your empire, why tf are you trying to wage a war that is ruinous to yourself ?"
@@AFGuidesHD I already explained Britains position above. No hegemony in Europe, regardless of who is attempting it.
@@generaladvance5812 there's a difference between an anti-British hegemon like Napoleon and what Hitler wanted which was a pro-British hegemon. The alternative was what we got, a communist and American split Europe with a ruined Britain.
@@AFGuidesHD Hegemony is hegemony, Britain does not care if it is pro or anti anything. Foreign policy for centuries.
@@AFGuidesHD Britian didn't want a hegemony in Europe fall stop. A powerful country would threaten the balance of power what Britian wanted to keep after the Congress of Vienna. Even before this, Britan fought wars aganinst a Powerful france for centuries, an ally can quickly become a rivial and this wasn't on the table. A powerful European what threatens the balance of power will always threaten britians interests, e.i. The 7 years war, Napoleonic war, Crimean War, Both World wars.
I can't believe Hitler tried to claim that some Roman emperors were Germanic. I wonder if Dovahhatty has seen this, he'd be pissed.
Every time I hear the word Burgundy the TNO brainrot kicks in.
This is absolutely fascinating. Your detail is amazing. Congratulations! Fantastic job! Please keep up the great work 🙏 and never given up.
34:47 man, that's a cursed map
Interesting. I’d like to see a video on German (and by extension possibly Japanese) ambitions on the rest of the world.
@GreatJabzy wth
That's not how grabbing land works. The concept itself is an everest yet to be sumitted
There already is a video on Japan's ambitions: ruclips.net/video/yYlEhJRSUq8/видео.html. And it sounds like the next video will be on Germany's ambitions outside of Europe.
@@WellBehavedForeigner Yes we know these are unrealistic ambitions, I was just curious on what they wanted for the rest of the world.
@@timothyhh Ah, thank you!
I am looking forward to the next video on this, I hope you’ll do more and maybe talk about Germanys goals for other continents.
Also, I am curious, what sources are you using for info?
It is certainly mostly Wikipedia. I have seen most of this detailed on there.
Elvis didn’t actually die and neither did my other hero
Thanks for the video! You make such excellent videos! Glad to have your videos to watch :)
Can't wait for the Turkey content. Such an interesting dynamic between the two, especially with the WW1 relations
Turkey messed up the 20 century more than most like to think
@@burtonkephart6239 With what? What did Turkey do?
@@Obrez1 😂😂😂ok . They control access to Black Sea n Mediterranean , they play everybody ( US, Russia , Israel , Europe , Africa etc) they helped goad Russia and Germany into ww1, mass murder of Greek and Armenian Christians ( Armenian genocide -still haven’t admitted it, hey young Turks !) etc etc . They mucked up the whole Middle East causing unrest and half of todays problems there .the ottomans were a authoritarian empire that enslaved many and subjected even more
@@burtonkephart6239 Woah, and they got away with all of this? Based.
@@Obrez1 yes so far . Wake up. They still don’t recognize the Armenian genocide . Imagine if Germany did the same about their major boo boo
Thank you for your narration, pacing, and subtle ambient music. I appreciate this.
Seems like flipping was the better deal for Italy. Only lost the colonies and Istria instead of half the country. Mussolini should have stayed with his original distrust of the Germans and joined the Stressa front. There wouldn't have been a WW2.
Well, the only reason he didn't was Britain and France wouldn't support him in his empire building. He basically just said "fuck it, I don't like Germany ruling, but at least I'll get a bigger slice this way." Plus Britain and France were letting Germany push so much he felt they lost sight of their plans.
I see this abjection all the time, "WW2 wouldn't happen".
Of course it would.
I severely doubt Italy was the reason Germany was so confident to invade Poland and without Italy, best case scenario is that the war starts sometime in 1940 instead.
People keep throwing scenarios around but WW2 is an imperative in the same way that WW3 is. Even if it happens 3000 years from now, there will be a WW3 just like there would have been a WW2 even if you removed Italy from the equation.
@@wallachia4797 it's the natural way of things I guess, rise and fall repeatedly.
Most of Germany’s claims on Italy took place after they had already flipped. Notice the reference to Italian treachery. Furthermore, the claims expressed in these videos are the MAXIMUM claims of these nations. In no way could all of these claims been satisfied.
WW2 is still happening in some form, although if it's UK, France and Italy vs Germany it would be a one-sided conflict. Who knows, maybe the Nazis would have maintained their friendship with the Soviets in lieu of losing Italy, leading to an unholy alliance between the two?
To unite the peoples of Europe under a single banner for a common cause
"that's a nice country you got there, would be a shame is someone came and lebensed your raums"
As a fellow flemish person, it's true to this day that we are more based than our nothern neighbour, the Netherlands.
Well, more bases than the walloons obviously
More striving to serve in SS = based
I am sorry?
The flemish should join the netherlands but still keep cultural identity that we we can become a stronghold in europe
@@ptero Yes.
@@henkschrader4513 Problem with the Netherlands is that they are far more liberal than the Flemish. I wouldn't mind to join if they weren't.
what did kanye want in europe?
To be in Paris
@@pumpkinspimph5250aryans in paris
Turkey just vibing while basically all other countries in the map have been altered in some way.
Jabzy : What did Hitler want for Europe ?
Kanye : He wanted to build highways!
@Keiki Haniyasushin he just a useful idiot for your cause. Hell he does not even understand that he is racially speaking a subhuman by the logic of National Socialism
"He made highways!!!!"
15:33 you know when a plan is bad when the narrator laughs at it
Very interesting -- some of these claims are just bizarre! Also, possible cursed TNO Burgundy moment??
Great work with minimal advertisement!
This video is genuinely brilliant
To be honest, I like the idea of bringing together all the Germanic countries (Germany, Denmark, Sweden, Norway etc.) and creating 1 big German state.
And Flanders being finally seperated! So: Germany, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Austria, Flanders and the Netherlands :)
While I’m not aware of the Soviets having any designs to expand farther west then East Germany it would still be cool to see the Soviets plans for Cold War expansion
there litteraly werent any, there was only a insane plan "7 days to the river rhine" where a swift blitzkrieg operation would crush west germany in 7 days, probably leading to the unificacion of germany under east germany.
Russian Imperial designs as well
Only a Jewish person would say that
1) 1812 France lead by Napoleon invaded Russia
2) 1914 Germany invaded Russia
3) 1918 US, England Japan 10+ or 20+
(differrment sources) invaded Russia
during Revolution
4) 1941 Germany invaded USSR
5) 1989 US EU NATO secretly helped
USSR implosion + break up.
Who invades whom??
Obviously he wanted to sell his art collection, duh... 😏
I thought YT was recommending me the same video until I saw it had 3 parts
I'm waiting with excitement part 3, I'm curious if it's true that they truly had designs in America, not only the US or Canada but Latin America, what would they want the continent to be.
Nothing serious. Like, there were some table talks that were never a part of the official policy, just wishful thinking that were completely void of reason and realism. But essentially, everything outside of the Generalplan Ost was not official and not a priority. Especially for places like Americas and Africa. Generalplan Ost was already extremely optimistic and if successful would take the entire century if not more to be finished and would eat all the time, resources, money and focus that Germany could muster.
Even various topics within the rest of Europe were kinda non-defined (as you can see in the video) as Germans really did not care that much. It was mostly an afterthought. The priority was eastern expansion and reorganization of the order in the east. Everything else was not really planned, but had more of a "we'll cross that bridge when we come to it" vibe.
But sure, you could probably dig out some table talk about Germans planning planetary domination and expanding their influence into space as well. But those were nothing but a simple table talk and fantasies that no one really took seriously. Simply because even their main goal and reason for starting the war was already outside of their scope of possible. It made little sense to fantasize much about Americas, Africa etc.
I don’t know about what they would’ve done with North America, but I did see articles on how Germany planned to expand trade in South America, in the hopes of becoming their biggest trade partner, and achieving economic hegemony. They even planned to divide the continent into different countries under German control. Roosevelt presented a map concerning this, and while the map was a forgery, it was based off a real map to get South America into the New Order.
@@Wustenfuchs109 take a shot every time you typed table talk
European Confederation”, drafted in 1943 under Foreign Minister, Ribbentrop, he wanted a European Union. Maybe not what we have today, but some type of European federation.
the aryans are and were a superior culture and race. only the chinese/japanese are somewhat comparable.
but at the time of hitler it was not understood fully, or rather it was forgotten, that the slavs, the rus and ukrainians especially, were aryans. partly from the initial group of aryans/indoeuropeans, and later formed and united and guided by nordic aryans, in the viking age, leading to kievan-rus, which later tumbled the step hordes. after that, however, they replaced and intermixed with the steppe hordes, and when the russian empire replaced the mongol one, they gradually because less european and chose/had to adapt to the role of "the world island" geopolitical player, and not the european or the rimworld player. after all it is geography that shapes cultures, that in terns shapes genetics and "longterm/inborn culture".
hence why most cultures are valid and competitive, in their specialized inviroment... were it not for the joker-card: technology/anti-biological evolution. which is the underlying course for all bullshit in the world. that much have been known from the start. but its and armsrace and an opioid both, so who are to lower their gun first?
Ok weirdo , go get some sunlight and touch some grass .
Take your meds and brush up on your writing Eugene.
Yap yap yap, touch grass
The tiny pupils all alone on the eye. And the eyebrows...
Omg I love the tiny and isolated pupils..so cute..A bridge between realism..and South Park eyes
Finally, the second part is here!
If I remember right, Hitler's entire plan was to just focus on the East. If Britain and France hadn't cared about Poland, then WW2 as we know it would not have happened. It would have just been more of a Nazi-Soviet war than anything else, because Hitler surprisingly cared very little for the West and just wanted his own empire out of the way from everyone elses. I suppose it helps that everything East of Moscow was completely uncontested outside of the Soviet Union, so if they had conquered them, then they would have no competition or threats (except maybe the Japanese but considering Hitler called them Honorary Aryans, I'm sure there would have been some sort of compromise)
Exactly. Even Ian Kershaw has said there is no proof/documents to show Germany was planning to go West before September 1939
Can you give me at least one reference to the fact that he wasn’t planning a war against the west? I am currently researching the subject for a school project.
@@harry3615 that's not true. Hitler wanted to punish the west for the embarrassment of Versailles treaty. He was always craving for France and Britain and US. It was just a matter of time before he could attack them. If he was successful on Russians he would have unlimited resources for an offensive on the west side. Hitler was not trustworthy. His goal was to control the world by conquest
@@harry3615Mein Kampf
Don't cope. Hitler and the Nazis had to be stopped. They exterminated "inferior" humans and caused millions of genocides.
A very well researched presentation, thank you.
New kanye concert?
He wanted a world where Europe was the cultural centre of the world not America or the Soviets he wanted to create a volksgemeinschaft.
Such grand ambitions. Little did Hitler know, the swas wouldn't stika.
21:43 mistake in the vid, Bulgaria DID declare on the Allies, but not on the Soviets
6:56
*Burgundian Lullaby intensifies*
While what you said about the Hungary-Romania conflicts was true, its important to note that Hitler and some of his generals were impressed with the Hungarian Army at times, especially the performance of the Carpathian Group and the defence of the Árpád line. The only good thing they really said about the Romanians is that they contributed more men. The Romanians were criticized at the Seige of Odessa for using WW1 tactics. Further, Hitler distrusted the Latins, which included romanians. Antonescu was less radical than the very pro-german Iron Guard, so its possible that he would try to side with Italy in the Latin Bloc, bringing the romanian influenced Balkand with it. Hungary had no designes on the lower Balkans and had abandoned its claims on Croatia. This would make them much more cooperative ally.
On the other hand, the Hungarian fascist parties were also anti-german, so they would have likely closed themselves off like romania did in the Warsaw pact.
To me, the choice is such a tossup that Hitler would likely let the two duke it out and side with the winner
This comment sounds like a classic mad Hungarian only because Hitler and the Na*is wrote bad things about the Hungarians but spoke greatly about the leader Ion Antonescu and how they would crush Hungary if a war broke up after WW2.
It is true that Ion Antonescu fought the Iron Guard who were Pro-Germans but you forgot to mention that Hitler supported it, and allowed Iron Guard officials and Politicians to take refuge in Germany.
Let me guess.. you're a hungarian 🤣
You need to write a whole essay full half-thruts well chosen to defend your nationalistic pride, but lowkey you know that if Germany had won it would have been in Antonescu's favore and your country probably would have been annexed.
@@InAeternumRomaMater You're the one that sounds mad. I made points for why Hitler could have preferred either one. He also said that "[Antonescu] is a born soldier, but his misfortune is having romanians under his command."
He didn't like either country, and pretending that he liked Romania makes no sense.
Also why would I be mad? There's no reason for me to want my country to be a Nazi puppet. I'm just discussing historical events.
Why do you like someone that basically raped your country and let nearly every neighbor take a bite out?
@@andrasbeke3012 I sound mad? I have no reason to be. And where did you get the quote from?
@@andrasbeke3012 And weirdly, Hitler wanted to put Ion Antonescu in Command of the Stalingrad divisions. Herman Hoths 4th division (German) would have been changed with the Romanian 4th division under Constantinescu Claps and Dumitrescus 3rd Division (Romanian), and Paulus 6th division (German) would have been under the command of a Romanian Marshal. Of course this didn't happen because Stalingrad didn't fall, but Hitler still wanted the Romanians to be in control of Stalingrad who saw History's bloodiest battle. And in your comment you did try to put in a way that Hitler talked greatly about the Hungarian Carpathian division and the Árpád line and came with "how Romanians were criticised at the Siege of Oddessa" and also how they (you probably meant the Na*is) wrote the only good thing about the Romanians was how they contributed with more men, but you didn't write where you got those quotes.
Cool, waiting for the part which includes rest of the world
Fun fact: King Leopold I of Belgium is from the house of saxe-coburg & gotha, which makes him german.
really capitalizing on trending Kanye lol. I'm going to go back and watch your scramble for Africa stuff again. I've taken in enough WW2 history over the last few years
@keikihaniyasushin8574 SURE THING PAL
With regards to Spain, some members of the basque nationalist party in exile in France sought accommodation with the Germans and there were talks of establishing an independent basque republic on the grounds that they were more aryan than the rest of Spaniards. In fact a few years ago a bit of an scandal happened because some tapes were found apparently of a few German officers going through the Basque Country and investigating its culture and also the names of several high ranking basque nationalist party members was discovered. Interestingly enough, this was not the case with the catalonian nationalists, as while the left wing section sided with the republicans and were the ones in control of the region along with the anarchists during the civil war, most of the right wing which belonged for the most part to the high catalan burgoise collaborated with the nationalists during the spanish civil war, giving them important financial aid and representation in the exterior, receiving in return their land and industrial properties seized during the civil war and many of them would become important members of the francoist state (with many joining the Falange despite its centralist positions) so there really wasn't any attempt on that side to seek an agreement with the germans.
Also there’s a lot to be said about Hitlers view on Spain and the Spaniards. Like many of his views of other nations, his opinions could swing 180 depending on the mood he was in. After Franco “made” Hitler to reject him into the Axis, there was talk of still carrying out an invasion of Spain itself for taking Gibraltar, but when Hitler caught wind of it he refused on the grounds that if Napoleon failed to conquer Spain, that meant that Spaniards had a spirit of resistance and guerrilla warfare that would be a logistical and military nightmare for the German army. Other times he would call them lazy and oriental.
Can't wait for South America part
@20:10 Yeah I'm convinced not invading Gibralter was a massive blunder of the Germans and Italians
Please do "What did Churchill want in WW2?" next
For Germany to stop being a dick, and for the Empire to safely continue into the future, that's it really
@@silverhost9782 Kaiser, we cant defeat France: lets go over Belgium than ... GB lets declare war.
Mein Führer, we cant get Danzig by democracy and Poland doesnt accept German land, which got stolen 1919, but Germany is rdy to give up. Most people in Danzig were German and the Königsberg region suffered, because Poland forbid Germany to tranport goods threw their land (Königsberg region was separated thanks to the victory powers 1919). Königsberg region suffers, delclaring war to Poland is justified ... what does GB do: declare war, which means half of the world is into war: why, because GB declared war extremly often or to quote Silverhost978: GBs empirte was the second biggest dick and thief in human history (mongol first).
@@sammybeutlin2763 sounds like a huge cope on your part tbh
@@silverhost9782 RIP British Empire
@@dwaynebronson870 Least we had one Dwayne,
Nice video
@GreatJabzyyour fake
Fascinating to listen to. Feel like this should get linked up with Indy Neidell's WW2 series
Great video! Btw, would you do a map with every axis claims on it?
That's not easily possible, all Axis nations had completing interests. I'm sure you can find someone on reddit who could theoretically make one, but they don't usually take commissions.
Ic
Part three coming that talks about rest of the world?
Such an ambitious projects they had... We actually need that vitality once again, that's the spirit of the Europeans.
He is my hero
11:29 how badly can you missjudge Anglo-American Relations
@GreatJabzy if you're the real one then why aren't you using his account?
it wasn't really "Anglo" relations, it was quite literally Churchill-American relations, it's why Churchill is such a big hero in America. Before the half-American came along Britain was a rival of America, as America even during the war treated them like an enemy more than an ally. It's why the Germans were so confused as to why Britain preferred to be treated this way than ally with Germany against the Americans.
He should have never trusted Anglo elites initially. Big mistake.
Could you make a video about the same topic but with Spain instead of Germany?
Well, we pretty much know what would have happened because the administrative documents for a post-war Europe exist. They were created by Hans Heinrich Lammers, Chief of the Reich Chancellery.
What I like to imagine, is immediately following the collapse of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics through Operation Barbarossa and the end of the war in Europe, the victorious German/Axis soldiers return to their respective homelands to a hero’s welcome and with a new sense of pride and honor the likes of which the world has never seen before.
With the war over, the Greater German Reich, the Republic of Finland, Kingdom of Romania, and Kingdom of Hungary all received colonies in the East. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics is carved up into pieces. The Baltic States become protectorates, while Ukraine and Russia proper up to the Ural Mountains become German colonies. While the exact extent of the colonies varies, the concept is pretty clear. The newly established Reichskommissariat Russland is to be governed by none other than Joseph Stalin with ϟA-Obergruppenführer Siegfried Kasche as Reichskommissar. Adolf Hitler had always admired Joseph Stalin and hoped that with the defeat of the Soviet Union he would rule by his side. Believing his brutal methods and policies are necessary to keep the peoples of Eastern Europe in line. Having reportedly stated:
“Stalin knows better than anyone else, how to handle the Russians.”
But Slavic People would not have had many rights and would be treated as second-rate citizens at best, slaves at worst.
In the west, the Kingdom of Norway, Kingdom of Denmark, the Low Countries, and France would regain their independence with the withdrawal of the Wehrmacht, but with pro-German governments and there are also territorial changes for France and Belgium. Luxembourg was annexed by Germany. Greece and the Balkans would also regain their independence but would be under more firm German control compared to Western Europe.
Citizens from western countries would be partially resettled in lands in Poland now vacated of Poles (also resettled). This consists mainly of Dutch and Belgian people but Danish and French volunteers also welcome as well. They would be given farmland and a farm in Poland.
Gradually, a European Union would be created with Germany as the most powerful member state.
Adolf Hitler wanted this Union to include all of Europe, including neutral nations, but he did not plan on invading any of them if they had refused to join.
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland would officially not part of this Union but would be closely associated with it, obtaining most of its resources from its Empire while the Union acquires most of its resources from the former Soviet Union (European Russia).
A European Army, Navy, and Air Force would be created, in which German would be the command language.
Healthcare remains a national aspect with no plans for a larger European healthcare system.
Certain aspects such as environmental laws and animal rights laws would be forced on all European countries.
This Union would see the free movement of persons and goods, pretty much like the present Schengen Agreement.
With the free movement of persons and goods, it would be possible to study abroad and find work abroad, pretty much like in the European Union today.
The European economy would be a planned economy to a large extent with fixed wages and prices for a lot of goods. Studies are made about how much a bottle of wine should cost to make the bottle profitable and affordable at the same time, for example.
Historically, currency was never clear. Some plans wanted to introduce the Reichsmark (ℛℳ) as the European currency, other plans called for fixed exchange rates with countries retaining their own currency.
This world is just a HOI4 players idea of the world. Which isn't a good thing.
I never knew Der Führer was such a talented fan fiction writer!
Are you going to make a video on German colonial ambitions or not, because I am even more interested in nazi Germany after watching your videos and would like to see what they were planning for aftica and other continents
There is an upcoming part 3
@@outerspace7391 oh that's really cool!
I knew fascist views on ethnicity were simplistic and stupid, but I never realized the extent to which it's all just ethnographic fanfiction.
Hitler was a very, VERY stupid man and that's when he wasn't hopped up on enough coke to see god. You ever actually read his book? An author the man was not.
You are mixing up fascism and national socialism
Your mistaking fascism with nazism.
The definitions they used are arbitrary, withouta doubt. However, a truly scientific and universally true method to define a people has exited since the 90's... i.e. genomic sequences.
Yep, as well as their wishfull horseshit view of history and linking that to more horseshit ideas
6:50 BURGUNDY 😂
In other words, Germany and the UK have a lot in common.
Our commonality is literally in our blood.
Reminds me of drunken college freshmen discussing geopolitics at 2:00 AM
Damn this is a good video
@Keiki Haniyasushin
Why?
@Keiki Haniyasushin
What are the lies in the video though?
@@RestitutorEuropa don’t listen to him he’s just delusional
I wonder what role Turkey would play in all this, due to the strategic Bosphorus and the Dardanelles.
Oh no not burgundy...
What did Ye want in Europe?
Based
An anglo/german empire that does sound scary image that on a map
This is the best timeline for Ireland lol
Great video 👍🏻
Fun fact: the Nazi Brittany has the same name as the current Brittany's flag
You should read the Stuckart Denkschrift. Very interesting.
That carved out Wallonia makes no sense. It was supposed to be part of Burgundy which was a Degrelle idea.
Uh oh, ordenstaat burgund moment?
As a Romanian, this gives me mixed feelings. It would seem that my country would be markedly better off today if the Nazis won, but I can't quite reconcile that with the overall loss that humanity as a whole would suffer. It's better for the world at large that things turned out the way they did, but I doubt it's better for my country. Then again, Antonescu was mortal. What then, what after his death? Hitler didn't respect Romania, he respected Antonescu. More food for thought I guess.
I'm also Romanian, I would suggest you read the book 'Maresalul Ion Antonescu - o biografie' You will see there notes that are considered personal, like one of us texting someone and only 2 people would know the context. From what I can tell you without leaving a spoiler, We had the upper hand in getting everything we wanted, Hitler and SS were on our side since 1942, we could've taken back N Transylvania after the war and live as the small hegemon in the Balkans, but there is information about German retalion if we decided to go too further.
Again, as a romanian I suggest you read books that cover personal notes of historical individuals, this is the best way to learn history and see exactly personal opinions :)
every country in Europe would be better off because they would not be flooded with millions of Africans
As an bulgarian I can say that Bulgaria declared war on USA and the UK in 1943.
Hearts of iron 4 ahh bordergore
We can still do this
Fascinating! I find it amazing that some of these complex proposed divisions and solutions were still apparently being expounded by leaders within Germany even when to any objective viewer the War was already going so badly for them in 1943!
P.S……I also enjoyed hearing the River Danube being “Da-noob” for the first time ever! 🤣
How else do you say it. I've said that way all my life
Granted I do live in the US and we are known for mispronouncing things anyway
try not to take over Europe and fail as Germany **challenge impossible**
Dont wanna defend the germans they were terrible but they did not want to take over entire europe. They only really had beef with Poland and the Ussr. They then had to open up other fronts because France and the UK declared war on them.
@@hazzmati They did, in fact, want to take over the entirety of Europe. Read a book, mo chara.
@@hazzmati there is literally an hours worth of content on this video and the last one showing the serious plans to do much more they just never got the chance
@@achanneltruly5331 they didn’t. Hitler respected the uk and had no intention of attacking france until those two declared war on germany
@@hazzmati that's simply psuedo history. hitler was always gonna attack france, and they declared war in defense of their ally which hitler knew they'd do
What’s the music you use in the background of your videos?
Britain and France should've just let Germany take Poland and not declare war, then let Germany and Russia inevitably turn on each other and watch them fight it out.
Germans were going to invade france for alsace Loraine
6:57 ORDENSTAAT BURGUND CONFIRMED?
Why would Greenland return to Denmark? Greenland was occupied preemptively by the US, not by the UK, and the US was never, ever going to leave even if the British had signed peace with Germany. The Danes asked the US to leave after WW2 in our timeline, and the US simply refused. If Denmark remained under German control, the US would have simply orchestrated an independence vote in Greenland and then signed a free association agreement or outright annexation. Given the horrors of Nazi rule, 99% of Greenlanders would've voted in favour voluntarily. The same applies to Iceland: the US wouldn't leave and Iceland still would've become a staunch US ally.
Germany’s love for britain reality shows how bad British rule was. Germany wanted to use British india as a blueprint for how to rule Eastern Europe
It's more than the Germans saw the English as the same as them racially, and as a group that was highly enterprising, successful and good at war. To Nazi eyes, the English were admirable due to the size of their empire, but the reasons why that empire came into being and the reasons why the nazis wanted one of their own were completely different. Hitler himself had to frequently deny that he had an inferiority complex towards them during speeches in the 1930s. The Nazis categorically showed that they misunderstood England/Britain at every turn during and before WW2 and this admiration they had was part of those misunderstandings. Interested to seeing a source for your final claim there.
@@silverhost9782 mein kamph where he praises how British ruled india. His reasons weren’t different, the difference really is what at least in Hitler’s mind he would’ve exterminated Slavs for German farmers while british reason to conquer india was to control trade and open markets for their own goods
@@zuesmaya8167What part of Mein Kampf is that? Quoting Wikipedia doesn’t count.
@@zuesmaya8167 However, recent research (see several websites) that
England killed 100 million? In India
over 200 years, WITHOUT direct
residential land grab. This was same
tactic as used in Ireland, etc.
Nazi Germany killed 27 million Soviets,
Imperial Japan killed 20 million Chinese
+ others.
I love the fact that Hitler always compares other slavic ethnicities to Czechs and says that Czechs couldn't be germanized. Even though Czechs share the biggest amount of German DNA compared to other slavic nations hahaha
Its because contrary to popular belief the Nazis did not put race above everything. They did alliances based on pragmatism and politics just like any other empire in history.
Incorrect; he actually said a sizeable number of Czechs could be Germanised
When the Soviet Union joined Germany in the invasion of Poland, why did Britain and France not declare war on them too?
Because declaring war on both would be a horrible idea if, you know, they had any intention of actually winning the resulting war
@@silverhost9782 An horrible idea is giving a crazy country like the SU/Russia the opportunity to get better weapon like the nuklear bomb. Now we can do nothing, when the SU/Russia declares war on someone. Horrible was the need for the Brits to stay Europes number one: they destroyed themselfs and Europe. We could had an alliance, crush with Japan the USA and stay continent number one. Now we all fade away in the shadow of the USA and China: both got strong, because of the greedy Britains oh, and the USA destroys the whole world and will wipe out human kind. Hitler knew that: now we all live in the souless USA system, which will destroy us all.
@@sammybeutlin2763 Unfortunately, there were two major powers in Europe being run by lunatics. The one who shot first got beaten to death, whilst the other was left to die of his own accord 40 years later. Overall, could have been worse. I'm not going to respond to the rest of that unhinged nonsense because it doesn't really deserve a response though
Use your head mate, in an ideal world they would have done, but declaring war on the two most powerful European army nations is seriously not a good idea.