What is the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation? And what does it mean?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
  • This video provides an overview of the accidental discovery and explanation of the cosmic microwave background radiation, the afterglow of the big bang, and follows the narrative of Steven Weinber'gs fantastic book: The First Three minutes. After reviewing the initial experimental work of Penzias and Wilson, a detailed account of the theoretical interpretation is presented, including a discussion of the thermodynamic legacy of the big bang, the Planck radiation law, recombination, and galaxy formation.
    References:
    The First Three Minutes - Steven Weinberg
    Cosmology - Steven Weinberg
    The Inflationary Universe - Alan Guth
    Introduction to Cosmology - Matts Roos
    An Introduction to Cosmology - P. OLESEN
    An Introduction to Modern Cosmology - Andrew Liddle
    Introduction to Cosmology - Barbara Ryden
    You can help support this channel via the Physics Explained Patreon account: / physicsexplained
    You can follow me on instagram: / physics_explained_ig
    You can follow me on Twitter: / physicsexplain1

Комментарии • 496

  • @gianni2k
    @gianni2k 3 года назад +535

    Hi Andrew, it’s Gianni here from our PhD days. Just massive congratulations on your videos, I’m happy you stayed in contact with all this fascinating stuff. I’m watching all of them and steal some ideas and explanations here and there for my students, hope you don’t mind. Hope all is well, best.

    • @PhysicsExplainedVideos
      @PhysicsExplainedVideos  3 года назад +208

      Hey Gianni! It is so good to hear from you :-) Thank you for your very kind words, they mean a lot. Seeing your message brought a massive smile to my face and transported me back in time - we had some wonderful conversations. Are you still in Argentina? Would love to catch up

    • @gianni2k
      @gianni2k 3 года назад +165

      @@PhysicsExplainedVideos I got a permanent position in Santiago, Chile, where I’ve been living with my wife, a dog and 3 cats for 7 years now. How about a zoom call one of these days? I speak of you often with my wife, just a fantastic, incredibly bright and interesting human being. Some real happy memories of you in a tough moment of my life. Would love a chat again.

    • @mg7509
      @mg7509 3 года назад +18

      @@PhysicsExplainedVideos huge fan of your videos. Love, from Argentina. ;)

    • @tonib5899
      @tonib5899 2 года назад +5

      He will be flattered your sharing his ideas.your students also benefit.As long as it’s not plagiarism the point of ideas is to share. Hope all is well.

    • @kevincleary627
      @kevincleary627 2 года назад +1

      It's Andrew? I could have sworn you were Brian Cox! You sound just like him and explain things just as well. Best physics videos on RUclips! I watch and rewatch them all.

  • @kaanasker4914
    @kaanasker4914 3 года назад +137

    Thank you, this channel is simply the "best" physics channel.

    • @PhysicsExplainedVideos
      @PhysicsExplainedVideos  3 года назад +5

      Thanks!

    • @CraftyF0X
      @CraftyF0X 3 года назад +1

      @@PhysicsExplainedVideos Um, forgive me this naively stupid question but I rly don't know who to ask about it. So if one does learn about Rindler horizons and Unruh radiation one may come up with the probably stupid question that how their effects (if they are present at all) are seperated from the CMB ? Let me explain a bit, and you correct me where I went wrong, so our reference frame can be thought as an accelerating one relative to certain distant parts of the universe due to the expansion. If that is true then this would mean that from our point of view the empty space in those regions would have black body radiation which should look like smooth thermal equilibrium. Now the question is that could this be really similar to the CMB itself ? I mean ofc the CMB has tiny temperature fluctuations, but is it possible that the Unruh effect modfies somehow the data ?

    • @alfredobeltran611
      @alfredobeltran611 3 года назад

      Agree 100%. Thanks for doing this kind of videos

  • @prakashraj4519
    @prakashraj4519 3 года назад +91

    I'm watching every video of yours, they are enlightening me.

  • @_abdul
    @_abdul 3 года назад +45

    We all have had our fair share of "White Dielectric Material"

    • @pipertripp
      @pipertripp 3 года назад +8

      I was spewing it liberally all over the disc golf course just this afternoon.

    • @duncanbrown7082
      @duncanbrown7082 3 года назад +2

      Apparently it’s good luck to be struck by it.

  • @craigwall9536
    @craigwall9536 3 года назад +7

    I met Penzias shortly after he and Wilson had been awarded the Nobel Prize; for some reason he gave a lecture at a Unitarian Church in Tulsa, Oklahoma, to an audience of about 30 people. I felt so bad for him- he was led to believe that they were interested in Cosmology. In fact, they were using him as a status symbol in a rivalry between two Unitarian "ministers" engaged in "one-upsmanship". When he took questions after the talk it became quite apparent that the audience was trying to use leading questions to put words in his mouth and he got pretty indignant.
    As the meeting broke up I tried to offer some condolences about how they had used him, but he was pretty terse and got out of there as fast as he could. I couldn't blame him. I myself, though an electronic technician doing avionics but with an interest in physics, had not been aware of this topic in cosmology and attended on a whim; if I had been up to speed on the subject I'd have asked a real question of two. As it was, I'm sure he left with a very bad taste in his mouth regarding the level of intellect in Oklahoma.

  • @emmettgriner6345
    @emmettgriner6345 3 года назад +28

    Awe-inspiring, as usual. You assemble the pieces of the story without getting bogged down in the details but disclose the details in boxed digressions. It was good to see how this video built on your video about the ultraviolet catastrophe. Also as usual, you've given me a few days worth of homework. Thank you and please keep up the good work.

    • @PhysicsExplainedVideos
      @PhysicsExplainedVideos  3 года назад

      Thanks for the kind words and continued support, I really appreciate it!

    • @rakeshkumar-db7qh
      @rakeshkumar-db7qh 3 года назад

      @@PhysicsExplainedVideos व,शव,चक्वबक,

    • @rakeshkumar-db7qh
      @rakeshkumar-db7qh 3 года назад +1

      @@PhysicsExplainedVideos सीसीकोचकसीक्सी,,हचकसीसीक्सी,सकचव,व्हवसीसीसीसीवबचककववववव,व,वेब,कि,बकच्छकवक्वब,कि भ,जब च,कककववहकवचवबचवकब,कवचकिववक्व,ब,वववचसवव,कसवच,वच, हसीब,9ककवव0किसी,हसीब हककवबछव,, हवकववक्वव,कि,ब,कककवच्चव वचक्व,च,कवव,शव सीसीसीसीववववक्सीककब,ववकच्छ,कसाव ,हवभकवसीसीसीसी,वककककवव हचचक कच्छ,कवसीसीकोह,कवसीसीसीसीगकव,भबच्छकव,सीसीसीसीब,ववसीक्सीक छह,सहसीब, किवकसीghcckccv,cvivvcvvhhv,chccchvvvvcvh,v ccv,v,cvcvccchvvhvccc cv,ccvvkvbi,ccccv vccccvv ccchchbccchvchvchchv,chchccvcchcvvv chxhccvvccvococcvccv,vccv b,ix icchicb,ccccv b,ccccccch cccchcvcovv,vcccccccvcv,hvccvccc. Cccvh occcccIcccch,, h,vcvccccvvcvccccc,occvccch,ccccvcc cccv cc c c h,hch hhccccch,c vc kcccc hcch vkvvv,hcckcccccc,bcbv,cc vv, vcccc

    • @rakeshkumar-db7qh
      @rakeshkumar-db7qh 3 года назад

      Ccvccbccc ,hc hb,cch,chcv, vo,b vhcvhकि,ह,,हगसीसीH,कि,वकबसाग,चववव,सHवक,कि क्वचि

    • @rakeshkumar-db7qh
      @rakeshkumar-db7qh 3 года назад

      @@PhysicsExplainedVideos छह,कि व,कि, हव ,वबकब्वग vc iकि। ककववव,क्वक्सव,ऑब्सीसीज ,

  • @Mr._Wizard
    @Mr._Wizard Год назад +2

    Former physics undergrad here, have been out of school for some years now. This content is incredible.
    Makes me feel like I'm able to apply myself to thinking about this stuff again. Really hope you keep making videos

  • @lewgiere2823
    @lewgiere2823 3 года назад +77

    As a retired EE (30+ years of RF/MW engineering, in both military and commercial electronics arenas) I've found your physics videos to be very delightful to watch. I've covered a lot of material over the decades and appreciate your illustrative depth of the derivations and meticulous treatment of the physics principles.
    This is technical pleasure-reading at its best. I particularly enjoyed your eight-part series on the maths of general relativity, the Bohr model of the atom, and of course this microwave background study.
    I very much look forward to seeing more.

    • @PhysicsExplainedVideos
      @PhysicsExplainedVideos  3 года назад +8

      Thanks for the feedback, much appreciated!

    • @Shadowless_Kick
      @Shadowless_Kick 7 месяцев назад

      @@PhysicsExplainedVideosMany articles say that the microwave radiation distribution corresponds to ~3K temperature because universe expansion has caused the temperature to “cool down” from 3000K at the recombination time. I think “cool down” is very misleading, 3K is not actual temperature, it is the apparent temperature due to Doppler shift effect. 3K implied by the microwave radiation distribution we detect today actually corresponds to the 3000K universe temperature 14 billion years ago. Can you kindly confirm this? Thanks

  • @awolgeordie9926
    @awolgeordie9926 3 года назад +35

    Another masterpiece. What I love about your videos is that anyone with A level maths can follow the working. For me though, this will require a second viewing. Thanks man.

  • @ahamadullahkhan4896
    @ahamadullahkhan4896 3 года назад +3

    This is the best physics related RUclips channel explaining concepts in detail…..thanks a lot sir…….

  • @Moral-insights
    @Moral-insights 3 года назад +24

    You just have to continue to produce these videos. I have never really come across physics videos that I can listen to for more than ten minutes. Your work is great and it's so great that I had to come out and actually comment on a RUclips video which I don't do much at all. I am here to encourage you to continue producing these great works, I am hungry for this stuff and I am far from being satiated.

    • @PhysicsExplainedVideos
      @PhysicsExplainedVideos  3 года назад +3

      Thank you very much for your kind words of encouragement, they mean a lot! I have plenty more videos on the way!

  • @awkweird_panda
    @awkweird_panda 3 года назад +10

    Found your channel yesterday, going to binge watch all your videos now💯

  • @austist
    @austist Год назад

    my person deep down has an agonizing interest in answering questions i have for this universe. i have yet to fully understand the contents of this video but i will come back when im learned and do understand. thank you for your content

  • @pyrokinetikrlz
    @pyrokinetikrlz 3 года назад +5

    One thing that is almost never mentioned is that the CMB irregularities are extremely small and that lovely multicolor graph is a very exaggerated representation of the real thing

    • @pyrokinetikrlz
      @pyrokinetikrlz 3 года назад +2

      1 part in 100 thousand, as said in this video

  • @NadellaVasishta
    @NadellaVasishta 3 года назад +5

    Been a fan of your work and presentation since black body radiation video.. thanks for making productive content for us.. ❤️

  • @DoganErbahar
    @DoganErbahar 3 года назад +1

    Saw the video 4 days ago. Knew it would be awesome, so saved it for a quiet night, and enjoyed every single atom of it. Keeps getting better and better...

  • @srinivasatr1395
    @srinivasatr1395 3 года назад +19

    Really appreciate your in depth understanding of the subject you are presenting and doubly appreciate the meticulous nature of your explanation. Great work. Keep it up.

  • @EMWave
    @EMWave 3 года назад +2

    Yet another wonderful explanation of formation in such a lucid way. It makes my day when I watch your videos. It is comforting to know that universe works on a basic laws of physics, yet it looks very complicated when looked at it with bare eyes. Thank You!

  • @supreetsahu1964
    @supreetsahu1964 3 года назад +3

    Your channel is everything I ever wanted from RUclips. Hope you skyrocket to a million subscribers soon

  • @Filip-ci3ng
    @Filip-ci3ng 3 года назад +6

    This is great !
    If opinion of a RUclips hobby physics follower matters, I think the best CMB short story so far

  • @ironlegnebula
    @ironlegnebula 3 года назад +5

    Thank you very much for keeping quality content going!

  • @kappo8993
    @kappo8993 3 года назад +2

    Just amazing! I'm from Brazil and I would probably never find that level of information and detailed content by ordinary ways. Thanks.

  • @musicmakelightning
    @musicmakelightning 3 года назад +14

    Brilliant work. I will add that as a child I lived in New Jersey within a bike ride of the Penzias/Wilson antenna and I rode past it many times. I had no clue what it was, and neither did my parents. It was only much later when I got into university that I learned what it was, and how Penzias won the Nobel Prize using it. Penzias gave the speech at my graduation and I was a rabid physics fan, so it was an experience I will always remember.

  • @toxxikanshul
    @toxxikanshul 3 года назад +14

    This is a GEM. I am a Phd research scholar with my thesis on CMB. And this video is must watch for anyone to begin research in this field.

    • @PhysicsExplainedVideos
      @PhysicsExplainedVideos  3 года назад +1

      Cheers for the kind words, much appreciated. Good luck with the PhD!

    • @toxxikanshul
      @toxxikanshul 3 года назад

      @@PhysicsExplainedVideos thanx and can i have your email bcuz i tried to search in “about” section but its not there.

    • @prateekgupta2408
      @prateekgupta2408 3 года назад

      @@toxxikanshul you're lying that you're a PhD student

    • @toxxikanshul
      @toxxikanshul 3 года назад

      @@prateekgupta2408 oh lol okay bro. Im surely not gonna pleasure u with proof. Blessings for u.

    • @Shadowless_Kick
      @Shadowless_Kick 7 месяцев назад

      @@PhysicsExplainedVideos I think it would be nice if you emphasized why the background microwave can be detected in any direction -- of course, the reason is that the point where we were was INSIDE the universe then and we are still inside the universe now, but this explanation could be hard for most viewers to figure out by themselves.

  • @LetsFindOut1
    @LetsFindOut1 2 года назад +3

    i forget if ive commented before, but just want to give a little encouragement along with the rest of the commenters here.
    I'm reading up on JWST and am trying to grasp the general consensus about the LCDM model and obviously the CMB is a huge part of what any model of the universe must fit into. So I just want to say thanks for making such articulate and precise explanations in easily digestible video form. (your graphics are amazing too btw)
    Your channel is one of the few that find a great balance between understandable-but-too-simple and accurate-but-too-complex-to-follow. I walk away feeling like Ive understood a majority of the maths and (equally importantly) the history of how theorists arrived at our current understanding.
    Too many popular explanations of the CMB in particular fail to explain blackbody radiation, Dicke and Peeble's prediction of the recombination epic, and useful historical tid-bits like that Penzias and Wilson were originally looking for 21-cm lines and even pointed their telescope at Andromeda to rule out Milky Way origins for the unexpected microwaves.
    Sorry for the ramble. No need to respond, just keep up the great work. This channel will undoubtedly be used in the classroom for generations to come. It's just way too insightful not to. (I can only hope you get compensated appropriately for your excellent work).

  • @nexus3112
    @nexus3112 3 года назад +1

    Your videos make me perceive the concept at the plank level of understanding ... keep it up ... Really appreciate your work!

  • @ReynaSingh
    @ReynaSingh 3 года назад +19

    Keep up the good content 🙏

  • @Briantreeu123
    @Briantreeu123 3 года назад +7

    Great video great channel thank u for these videos and the explanations that come with it. Maybe a video on Gravitational wave background

  • @amityaffliction4848
    @amityaffliction4848 3 года назад +3

    Excellent video. Well done

  • @georgefan2977
    @georgefan2977 3 года назад +11

    This is some incredible work. Also I love the dark theme, super friendly for our eyes

  • @evilotis01
    @evilotis01 3 года назад +6

    is it the actual, detectable remnant of the birth of the universe? or is it ... bird shit? what a great story :)

  • @EASYTIGER10
    @EASYTIGER10 7 месяцев назад

    This is the clearest explanation of microwave background Radiation I've heard

  • @tiaraguy7705
    @tiaraguy7705 Год назад +6

    I'm very much your average Joe who works a normal job and has a GED but I've come to realize in these last couple years I always seem to enjoying watching videos regarding science or reading about the history of math. I even enjoy videos like these when it's so far out of my pay grade but I still feel like it can teach me so much even from a conceptual standpoint. It helps me feel like I have a slightly better grasp of something that's still very foggy to me. Hopefully I will be able to understand this from a purely mathematical view someday too.

  • @felicityc
    @felicityc 3 года назад +5

    I really like these videos even if I have gone over it all a thousand times.
    probably the accent

  • @johngavin1175
    @johngavin1175 3 года назад +2

    Ah,yes. Good vid,man. Disappointed to see it drew in some conspiracy theorists and flat earthers. Oh well. Subbed.

  • @mostinho7
    @mostinho7 3 года назад +4

    The first time I understand what all the pop science channels mean when saying the universe was opaque before it cooled down
    13:45

  • @sanjaya718
    @sanjaya718 19 дней назад

    Fantastic description! Crystal clear

  • @misterschifano
    @misterschifano 3 года назад +8

    Your videos are exactly what I need as I prepare to make the transition from being a lifelong chemistry and physics teacher to a second career as an actual physicist. I watch once all the way through for conceptual flow, then again stopping them until I can do the maths shown at each step. The single fastest improvement in my rigorous understanding.

  • @thorntontarr2894
    @thorntontarr2894 3 года назад +12

    You are to be commended for NOT making it so simple that the message is not presented. This video would have been so helpful during undergraduate days, about the time Wilson, Penzias & Pebbles were doing their work. Yes, I am old. Along with your Vacuum Catastrophe Video this is the best I have ever seen on these topics. Your work is very important; I thank you for your energy.

  • @3Space1time
    @3Space1time 3 года назад +5

    You need not mention radiation as microwave is a type of radiation only 😄
    Btw Loved the video 🤩

  • @dottedrhino
    @dottedrhino 3 года назад +2

    I hope you will continue making these excellent video's :)

  • @kaanasker4914
    @kaanasker4914 3 года назад +7

    Can you make a video about general relativity?

    • @coeur8042
      @coeur8042 3 года назад

      Yes, and all relativity theories!

  • @rajarshisen1631
    @rajarshisen1631 3 года назад +2

    Your work is simply beautiful 👍

  • @murraymadness4674
    @murraymadness4674 3 года назад +1

    It really is fascinating...how much we can learn from equations ---- the most awesome power of all is "="

  • @DrDress
    @DrDress 3 года назад +4

    I just had my car washed, but this morning it had a big blotch of white dielectric material on it.

  • @naseemnich860
    @naseemnich860 3 года назад +3

    Hi great fan of your videos but could you add the subtitle

  • @syte_cloud9829
    @syte_cloud9829 3 года назад +7

    i absolutely love these videos

  • @kentonjones5394
    @kentonjones5394 3 года назад +2

    I appreciate your work.

  • @mattkerle81
    @mattkerle81 Год назад +4

    Straight up in my top three physics channels for accessibility and making complex topics available for under grads, thanks!

  • @tophan5146
    @tophan5146 3 года назад +3

    20:50 Hey, I remember integrals that result in a PI from your other video!

  • @marlonwood6529
    @marlonwood6529 3 года назад +5

    Always makes me happy to see a new video of yours :)

  • @kulhman
    @kulhman 3 года назад +4

    Your videos are so in depth. I'm glad the algorithm brought you to my attention. Keep up the great work!

  • @marcosfreijeiro8763
    @marcosfreijeiro8763 3 года назад +1

    Awesome videos, love your content. Keep them coming👍🏻👍🏻

  • @AZ-vy4gl
    @AZ-vy4gl 3 года назад +4

    This is tons better than the usual "they heard extra static" explanation I've heard from everywhere else

  • @icyfyer
    @icyfyer 3 года назад +1

    I love these videos. Thank you so much.

  • @JGS2295
    @JGS2295 3 года назад +1

    Another excellent video!

  • @mpicos100
    @mpicos100 3 года назад +4

    Fantastic videos. Historical background, physical explanations (really good and insightful), some mathematical formulas to show how works the numbers, and great presentations with graphics and so on. Thanks for this, keep working on it, great material.

  • @YitzharVered
    @YitzharVered 3 года назад +9

    Hype

  • @matrix3509
    @matrix3509 Год назад +2

    For a visible light telescope, its easy to cancel out the noise of the electronics. You just need take an exposure with the camera shutter still closed. The resultant image is pure electronics noise (along with the occasional cosmic ray strike).
    I'm not a microwave or radio astronomer so I don't know if the procedure is as easy.

  • @bernard2735
    @bernard2735 3 года назад +4

    I feel as though I have just stumbled across a gem. Thank you for creating this wonderful channel. Liked and subscribed.

  • @hai-duynguyen8429
    @hai-duynguyen8429 3 года назад +5

    Can I ask what is your professional background? You have such a good grasp on topics like these. I wish I received the same process of thinking from uni professors. I keep rewatching some of your videos because I always seem to gain a new perspective on how intimate our world really is. From the cosmos down to the atom, these series beautifully compliment one another. Man what a great time to learn physics.

    • @PhysicsExplainedVideos
      @PhysicsExplainedVideos  3 года назад +6

      Thanks for your comment, much appreciated. In terms of my background, I completed a PhD in theoretical physics (focusing on String Theory), and have been teaching physics for the past ten years.

    • @hai-duynguyen8429
      @hai-duynguyen8429 3 года назад

      @@PhysicsExplainedVideos that is awesome, 10 years?! Can I also ask why did you started a RUclips series? Your videos have a lot personality to them. They give me vibes that you are really approachable to ask questions about physics.

    • @samposyreeni
      @samposyreeni Год назад +1

      @@PhysicsExplainedVideos That teaching background really shows and shines, yet it's importance is often underestimated. The didactic punch really is what produces the prerequisite number and quality in the next generation of science, for someone within it to "stand on the shoulder of giants".

  • @reversethursday4975
    @reversethursday4975 3 года назад +4

    I really love your videos, I look forward to the next fascinating deep dive. Best wishes man 👍

  • @ColeCoug
    @ColeCoug 3 года назад +9

    I love well done physics videos that aren't scared of explaining the math!! New favourite channel

  • @johnnytoobad7785
    @johnnytoobad7785 3 года назад +4

    These are great vids..even for a retired EE/software guy...

    • @PhysicsExplainedVideos
      @PhysicsExplainedVideos  3 года назад +1

      Glad to hear it, thanks for the comment!

    • @baki-dev
      @baki-dev 3 года назад +1

      They're also great vids for a software guy relatively fresh out of university :)

  • @chakflying1
    @chakflying1 3 года назад +3

    30:41 For me this is the most difficult part to intuitively understand. We have to accept that while the wavelength of all the photons does expand with the universe at the same rate, all photons are still infinitely small in size, because that's the only way we can draw the conclusion that their density decreased. Is there something to learn about how the expansion of the universe affect particles at the quantum level?

    • @PhysicsExplainedVideos
      @PhysicsExplainedVideos  3 года назад +4

      Yes this is a tricky concept. In fact, you can show with a relatively simple calculation that the 'average' separation of the photons is proportional to the wavelength of the photons. Hence, longer wavelength, means greater average separation, hence lower density.

  • @johnopalko5223
    @johnopalko5223 3 года назад +3

    Very nice and informative video.
    Arno Penzias was quite the character. He probably still is, at age 87. About 25 years ago I worked for a startup company of which Arno was one of the chief instigators. One day my boss and I were talking and he allowed as to how sometimes, when investors, etc., were giving them problems, they had to "wield Arno."
    The two of us decided that Arno was a +5 Nobel Laureate of Influence.

  • @vikaspoddar001
    @vikaspoddar001 3 года назад +2

    sir , a little request i want you make the video on schrodinger wave function which you promised in the video of bohr model of atom

  • @jamesgreen-armytage9927
    @jamesgreen-armytage9927 3 года назад +3

    I love how much of this stuff actually got started in New Jersey, which most people think of one of the most prosaic and least "cosmic" places around.

  • @pipertripp
    @pipertripp 3 года назад +8

    Another excellent programme. One of my favourite things about the history of Planck's radiation law is that Wien had found this relationship empirically in 1896, 4 years before Planck's solution to the ultraviolet catastrophe. Then, as you show, Wien's law just falls right out of Planck's work.

  • @Zardwark
    @Zardwark 3 года назад +5

    I cannot understand why this channel has only ~54k subscribers. It should be *compulsory*. Along with 3Blue1Brown.

  • @chacmool2581
    @chacmool2581 2 года назад +3

    I am an EE graduate who once considered switching to Physics. To this day I remain fascinated by these topics. These are brilliant videos.

  • @beardog6569
    @beardog6569 3 года назад +3

    Hi Andrew, I'm a stem cell biologist watching your videos for... fun. They are so good. I'm writing a lecture series and I'm so impressed with your style that I'm going to use some of it in my own delivery.
    Thank you

  • @xevy3493
    @xevy3493 3 года назад +2

    Amazing video.

  • @brendanacord2557
    @brendanacord2557 3 года назад +4

    Thanks for such a comprehensive explanation of one of my favorite stories in physics!

  • @seanspartan2023
    @seanspartan2023 3 года назад +1

    I'd be interested in your opinions regarding Planck stars.

  • @gabi-dh9eo
    @gabi-dh9eo 3 года назад +3

    I love your videos! Somethimes I can't understand some of the maths in some of them because I'm only 12..
    But I bought a few books in physics, so I hope to understand them in the future

    • @PhysicsExplainedVideos
      @PhysicsExplainedVideos  3 года назад +1

      Glad you like them! Keep working at the Maths and I am sure you will progress

    • @gabi-dh9eo
      @gabi-dh9eo 3 года назад

      @@PhysicsExplainedVideos 😁

  • @adogonasidecar1262
    @adogonasidecar1262 3 года назад +3

    Beautiful video. Thank you.
    I find myself struggling at times with transitions you make and having to pause, rewind and listen many times... Even with such great videos, this is no easy stuff!

    • @PhysicsExplainedVideos
      @PhysicsExplainedVideos  3 года назад +3

      Thanks for the comment and feedback. You are right, there is a lot of content squeezed into a short amount of time, so I think it makes sense to pause and process all the information. Good effort!

  • @albadarqamar7380
    @albadarqamar7380 3 года назад +11

    Lol ty calculus was really killing me so i opened yt and saw this

  • @luchotognola5846
    @luchotognola5846 3 года назад +2

    Amazing video, I think Im starting to understand the famous 2.7 Kelvin number that I've heard so much about. One question... lets say we mesure the CMB again in 2 billion years... because of the expansion of the universe should we see a different (lower value) of the thermal radiation?

  • @briz1965
    @briz1965 3 года назад

    you'll be in the school curriculum soon, keep it up mate

  • @juniordimitris16
    @juniordimitris16 3 года назад +1

    To make all these conclusions we assume that all of the used constants ( c, k etc.) were having the same values for the entire lifespan of our universe. Have this been checked to be true or we are just assuming that? (Not a physicist😂)

  • @luisfelipe7351
    @luisfelipe7351 3 года назад

    i did a calculus do not know if it is correct, but the cmb is relative to the planck volume when the universe was really small

  • @acedia4454
    @acedia4454 3 года назад +1

    Got 0 (out of 15) points in circular motions & harmonic oscillators and 1 (out of 15) points in mechanical waves - why am I watching this? Im literally incapeable of understanding physics lol. Still enjoy your videos a lot. Your voice is so comforting.

  • @bhushanthakur6469
    @bhushanthakur6469 3 года назад +2

    I think time stamps would be of great help.

  • @_..---
    @_..--- 3 года назад +2

    Thank you youtube for recommending this video.

  • @josefsvoboda7898
    @josefsvoboda7898 Год назад

    Amazing! Thank you very much.

  • @ariebaudoin4824
    @ariebaudoin4824 3 года назад +2

    20:44 ah good old proof by its a standart integral
    this comment was made by mathematics gang

  • @Earzone63
    @Earzone63 3 года назад +1

    The other day I heard about xray emission from supermassive blackholes and thought aha! the CMBR might be shifted xrays. This video has falsified that naïve hypothesis. ;-)

  • @m24213
    @m24213 5 месяцев назад +1

    You know you are watching too many physics explained videos when you can slightly predict how he is going to calculate the radiation pressure.

  • @DeadCatX2
    @DeadCatX2 Год назад +1

    26:10 "the details of this calculation are beyond the scope of this video" - *sweating*
    "but for those who are interested, I've put some links in the video description" - *sweating intensifies*

  • @borisdorofeev5602
    @borisdorofeev5602 3 года назад +2

    Already in the very beginning of the video is probably the best explanation of the 21cm hydrogen emission on RUclips. I'm not knocking other channels but most just say its a wavelength at which hydrogen emits a photon without this deeper understanding. It was very well explained in this video.

  • @SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace
    @SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace 3 года назад +2

    the # 21 is all over.

  • @vorealus
    @vorealus 3 года назад

    I don't know if there's any truth behind this correlation, but something that fascinates me is how similar the universe was before recombination to the internal structures of stars. Both are plasma soups that are opaque to photons and both are upwards of 3000K. Really cool to see physical commonalities in today's universe outside of the math.

  • @MrMikeEdie
    @MrMikeEdie 2 года назад +1

    Some background rattle on your mic. Otherwise yet another stonking broadcast, thanks.

  • @sundar6568
    @sundar6568 3 года назад +2

    Thanks RUclips ❣️

  • @ВикторФирсов-е9ф
    @ВикторФирсов-е9ф 3 года назад +2

    Quiet sadly, Georgi Gamov was never mentioned in this video

  • @diogenes999
    @diogenes999 3 года назад +3

    The clearest and most profound presentation I came across! Keep up the good work.

  • @thelonious-dx9vi
    @thelonious-dx9vi 3 года назад +2

    Wow, brilliant video, cheers. I've heard this story enough times that I've actually come to resent the white dialectric material, i.e. "here we go again". I heard the pigeons got whacked, when they came back, after an initial try at relocating them. Anyway, this is crammed with stuff I didn't know, including the first emergence of the ~3K temperature, which is such a crucial piece. But I don't quite get the apparent correlation between a given wavelength and its "effective temperature". If the key variable is intensity, wouldn't that depend on the amplitude of the waves, as opposed to the wavelength itself? So, 7.35cm wavelength ~ ~3K... I'm not quite getting that.
    I guess it's the association of higher photon energy with shorter wavelengths.

  • @jasonalexander5829
    @jasonalexander5829 3 года назад +1

    How do the sensors that detect this work?