Brian Cox: The Universe Existed Before The Big Bang
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 апр 2024
- Imagine if I told you that our universe has been around forever, even before the Big Bang. It might sound pretty wild, right? Well, hold onto your hats because renowned physicist Brian Cox is on board with this mind-bending idea.
For copyright matters please contact us at: thespacewindtv@gmail.com 
Наука
![Everything NASA Discovered from James Webb's First Year in Space [4K]](/img/1.gif)
The beauty of science is that it discovers, theorises, tries, concludes, and if mistaken, learns and corrects. It's fascinating and beautiful that there are so many things we still don't know about the universe. There is so much for us left to discover, to learn, to comprehend, to know.
I don’t think it’s okay to make mistakes about “ultimate reality” questions. It leads to mis information and fallacies
It’s okay to make a mistake on a math test but not publish mistakes to half the world
@@techteampxla2950 this is how we learn, however. How else will we understand reality? The more we learn, the more we expand our horizons, and the fewer fallacies and mistakes we will make. It takes time.
This is why, in modern science, we speak carefully. We say "as far as we know", we speak of "indicators", and unless something is proven and certain, we will make sure to be cautious.
That too is something that we've learned from past mistakes. The public have to catch up.
@@nataliaprzeszowska I wish I could agree but there are no such indicators from these talks , transcribe what they are saying and you never hear “we believe “ just strong statements that are misleading and usually fallacies if the wording is analyzed.
Just the title itself is false and unproven and a strong statement saying “universe existed before the Big Bang” that can’t even be right ???
“Our past understanding of the Big Bang might have been mis-interpreted based off new information we have. It is still being theorized because it’s such a new discovery “
So how did the Universe come to be
It didn't, it's always been there, without top, bottom or sides.
If the Earth is 4 1/2 billion years old I bet the universe is trillions of years old and there are probably billions of universes in the infinite space that is not expanding but is already infinite.
I appreciate the guys that are willing to make their guesses more confidently than anyone else
Taking guesses is fine , but manipulating information or being untruthful is problematic. Also when dealing with “ultimate reality” questions, guesses lead to fallacies if they don’t carry backing in a strong way.
@@techteampxla2950 Having control of the "science" narrative brings home the big bucks of funding. Gets you access to the telescopes, accelerators and super computers and whatnot. Not toeing to the mainstream narrative keeps you out of the big buck in funding.
The observable universe is probably less than 0.1% of the real scale
infinite..
A song said it best. Nothing from nothing leaves nothing.
We don’t live in a universe with absolute nothing. Nothing is still something in our universe.
that's some good drugs
BB probably a local event in an infinite universe
It’s amazing what Brian Cox and Dr. Carl Zucker discovered together recently while writing a paper on the expanding universe. They seem pretty excited about it. It’s called the “Cox-Zucker”principal of expansion 😬 say it slowly…..
hilarious ;-)
My head hurts.
😂
you're supposed to use a hammer
In a million years you won't think that it'll be very different
What will we think in a million years?
@@shaunteasdale6613 nothing, we go back from being a matter or energy, while the universe keep existing and time might actually an illusion. And no matter how hard our species tried to uncovered the truth about our universe. we will never be there to witness the truth, because there will be time that the universe cannot host life anymore as it will probably go back to its original form(singularity).
@@wilmerjr.dominguez2250 I still think we can’t even comprehend how the universe became .. I have my own theories. Oddly enough one of my sons has an astrophysics degree and 2 masters degrees in the same field and is nearly completed his PHD in the same field and what I’ve gathered is that we will probably never be able to understand what happened before.. just what happened after.
Universe has always been around. There is no start or end.
I'm with you on this you can't get something from nothing, so there always had to be something or we wouldn't exist !!!
I'm open to both alternatives. There's so much we don't know and can't determine because we are "in" the soup, so we need all hints we can get to figure out what's right.
@@midnightstories5695we can. Nothing is still something. We don’t live in a universe where absolute nothing exists.
agreed. I accept that there are concepts beyond the human mind. we are just bacteria ... probably lesser than that... in the realm of reality
@@zethloveless7238 Well we still don't know what the something is, so that leads us back to where we started !
No one knows…. That’s the magic of it . Cox ‘s humbleness , ‘ I don’t know’!
Because we feel alone in the universe it’s the reason we talk about this. If we know we are not alone and we had communicate with aliens then it’s not interesting anymore.
Infinity itself does not make something inevitable, it makes it highly probable
Time is real, so says my boss
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤪
😂😂
He manipulates Time.... Time at work goes v e r y slooow. On the weekends it swooshes by
If something is never ending, why would you think you see the end.
where is the matter from? how it was made?
Remember Prot from kpax said the universe goes thru cycles of expansion and contraction where everything time and space related repeat exactly as before !! So he was saying you get only once chance that get it right
Well, I put a stop to this video quickly. I put it on to listen to Brian Cox. Not this nobody.
Time may not have a beginning and an end. The concept of beginning and end is a man made concept of our mind we try to fit everything into
You don’t know much about the many, many, many years of real science do you! Try looking into anything you have doubts about. You might be surprised at what you find…
@@heathernemanic1062 lol explain
Definitely on the right track now. Stop looking at the tree When there is a forest.
Which one of the big bangs are we talking about? and How many universes exist, just like there are many galaxies , there are many more solar systems. and I bet bangs are happening more often then we think, I have always thought it very unlikely there was only one big bang.
If the big bang did happen just in small area where we are leaving but not in the whole univers but our scientists are taking what happened in our area and using it for the whole universe!!!!!!!
I believe your right Mr Penrose.
The whole universe was in a hot dense state when nearly 14 billion years ago expansion started… Wait!
Energy is neither created nor destroyed . It has always been and simply changes form over and over. 😊
I think it was Einstein that said the universe is the ultimate 'free lunch'...
Roger Penrose's CCC seems more natural than inflation.
How do we know that a Galaxie's red shift indicates its movement away from us rather than simply the light's wavelenght increasing due to it travelling over various vast fixed distances.
Also, how do we know that the microwave background radiation is residual radiation from the big bang and not the combined radiation from all the stars and galaxies in the visible universe?
But Lavoisier states that : "nothing is created, nothing gets destroyed, everything is transformed"... If that is true, Sir Roger Penrose is correct...
It still is passionate something that maybe never have answers. Mystery is part of this pulsar. This life
Something cannot come from nothing but then how can everything always have existed.
It is simply like a circle peppered with singularities. The circle we have long understood. The singularities we will never understand!
The logical conclusion from the Big Bang "creating" matter that we know of is that all known matter particles JUST HAVE TO ALL BE QUANTUM ENTANGLED!!! THAT EXPLAINS GRAVITY....
What do you think?
Maybe black holes as you observe them actually served as the waters that expanded the universe and the seeds. There direction was reversed and sealed after the big bang if that's the fabric of space time as you see it then that fabric would be able to move about all particles faster then the speed of light as even light can't escape it. One possibility.
The universe has always existed because space is the universe and has always been, it is a constant that does not shrink or grow. Matter within space also contains space which creates a vibration between matter and space that is gravity and creates the observable universe. Space and all the matter within it is like a galaxy circling a black hole and falling towards it until matter within the black hole becomes equal to the gravity of space and with the help of centrifugal force starts to expand into our flat observable universe.
Rubbish
Maybe not rubbish but personal, conviction without any reasonable argument.
So it is completely unsupported not true speculation!
You could say that about God so God has always been there
@@akink9620 maybe space is the origin of God
@bsmith577 Well God is a spirit no shape or form so space could be God
You would believe even though the universe is smaller than we think it's still very large.
singularities. Black holes implode until they explode and become singularities on the other side. Bubbles. It is not one universe, one timeline. Not all of the same age or size. With different growths and speeds. The error is thinking from an egocentric perspective and that your observations and experience are "the greater reality".
All evidence we had pointed to a singularity. Now we have new evidence.
this still doesnt explain WHERE or WHY this universe happened. even if its cyclical, where is this taking place?
If quarks can appear spontaneously, why can universes not? Is it not just the scale of the event that is so unimaginatively different. The notion of cyclical growth and decay is right in front of us, galaxies, black holes and the whole gamut?
The Dalai Lana was in conversation with a cosmologist. He said to the cosmologist ‘okay, big bang. But before that, other big bangs, other universes’. Maybe western cosmology is catching up with Buddhist understanding of the cosmos(es).
The inflationary multiverse.
Nah, first there was nothing, and now the heavens were sewed together and split apart into galaxies, There was nothing and then there were everything .
What a shocker 🙄 😂
Tom Gold was right back in the 50's
Phantasy
If one sees an object which it dose not exist at this time is it actually in the past or dose time actually matter.
If you peer into another universe I mean.
There are endless universes. With endless exponentiation.
In the beginning...........there wasn't one.
I'll give you an idea what it was like before the transmutation (not big bang)
in my video 'Begining of understanding '
Where I claim electrical processies overlooked
So we don’t know 😄
Even the very first minute ist wrong: The Big Bang definitely did not bang. There was no sound to hear, since there was no air to transport the sound.
Steady State Universe, or...the Universe *actually* grows coincidentally every time we make a stronger telescope? Hmmm...I know! Send more funding!! 🤣🤣
On d verge of a dyeing universe there r many black holes that coaalce while some get left behind of two or three dyeing universe may coaalse which might determine how big d new universe will be with what properties n with remenent black holes within this space...
Why is this so hard to understand?
--> Why is the Universe so perfect for life?
Because if it wasn't we wouldn't be here.
-> Why is the Earth so perfect for human evolution?
Because if it wasn't we wouldn't be here.
--> Why haven't we found intelligent life outside Earth?
Because it's shy.
--> How many alternate Universes are in the Multiverse?
37.
--> Why 37?
Because that's all there are. Prove me wrong.
Brian explained like he witnessed the universe birth and grow, that's so funny, because Big Bang or not, it is just a theory, who know? and the synonym of theory is guess, so I give my guess too, it's infinite where exist and inexist are coexist.
So many comments affirming bold claims with zero evidence, not a place for beliefs to be pushed as facts. A personal belief and truth is much different than a reproducable theory through equations or experiments
so the big bang was birth of OUR galaxy
@ brian cox. If all the gass in the sun was converted to an iron core, how much smaller would it be?
Very controversial. As to Hawking radiation from BHs, it's thermal and contains zero information about what fell into the hole. The cyclic universe is an old idea, as people have problems with the initial singularity. But that cannot be avoided. And the current expansion will hardly reverse itself and become a the Big Crunch. The multiverse is ruled out by Occam's razor. Quantum theory is not well understood, in particular in a situation where the gravitational field is not a static background. It is possible that spacetime is an emergent property of a very simple system with zero entropy.
I don’t believe every combination that is possibly exist that’s dumb
It is possible or as possible as any other guess. But even the CC concept still misses a key point. How did these galaxies get here so soon. Just stretch the theory further that yes all the matter and energy was consumed by black holes as the prior universe collapsed. But when most of those black holes merged or radiated and then exploded into the new universe there could be one or two black holes with the last matter or saw galaxies not yet sucked into the hole. When the near by massive black hole exploded it sucked in the other black holes and the nearby final few galaxies , like through a hole and them emerge in the new universe. One would think the galaxies would be a bit in pieces or stretched if true. As good a thought as any. Cheers
And why has everything have to begin somewhere.
If one believes in a mechanistic view, there is a set mix of energy and mater and the BB is merely one shift in the ratio of E to M and there cannot be such an origin since E/M shift over time but E+M=1 If a creationist, E/M is not random since E+M is the act of G-d. Either way, time +Distance=make your choice Boom or G-d!
our "universe", is an old science project abandoned in the backpack of an Alien's 5th Grader..for his summer break. ..and You can't prove me wrong.
Oh,,, Hawking's wrong too ???? Alrighty Then .........
a paradox...where did the energy come from to create the big expansion....the praying class has simplistic answers ..as if they would know...amen
A harmonically balanced self-Regenerative oscillating wave form.
None us know what's the real truth
But it is before and after humans
Why is there no consequences for being wrong ? Moving forward we need high levels of validly , and security behind such claims .
Let’s say 2 zero dimensional points were separated by time, yet still both existed simultaneously. If 1 second was like 1 second to one of those zero dimensional points, but 1 week was like 1 second to the other, it would make sense why the two are separated by time yet still exist simultaneously.
If 100 years went by while we never had a sense of being, that 100 years to us would seem like a flash because we wouldn’t have any memory of not having a sense of being.
Let’s say we never had a sense of being forever. Would that infinitely long period of time be like a flash to us. Well if an infinitely long period of time existed it would be impossible to measure a finite period of time against it.
I think the only way our sense of being can not exist, is if instead of 1 second feeling like one second, and 1 hour or 1 month felt like a second, our sense of being would not exist to someone who 1 second was like 1 second to. So if 1 week felt like 1 second to us, but 1 second felt like 1 second to the person standing next to us, according to that person standing next to us our sense of being does not exist.
So if 1 week is like 1 second to us, would that mathematically be the same as our sense of being not existing for ever, ever and ever.
To us, a hurricane, wave, or falling line of dominos doesn’t have a sense of being, but from what has been discussed is that really true.
There was nothing before the big bang. the universe arose from practically nothing. In accordance with the inflationary model, in the initial stage of its evolution the Universe experienced a period of accelerated expansion - inflation. It is assumed that at this point the Universe was “empty and cold” (only a high-energy scalar field existed) and then filled with hot matter that continued to expand.
Such a wierd dream.
People should just stop using the words Big Bang. Just say we dont know what when why how or if and leave it that way.
Im not a religious person at all i like to believe that the universe is god narure is god the sun is god because without it we definitely wouldn't exist
😂😂😂😂pure speculation.
No one knows how or when. It's all a mystery...
Geeezzzz I don't have a college education, I'm not a scientist, not religious, and I've questioned the BB and said this same thing for decades. When I asked a lot of questions and pointed out what didn't make sense to me about the BB theory to a UCSD microbiology professor friend, he got irritated and said, "You ask too many questions".
There is a lot of science that is very religious in nature. When they make statements like, "No matter how small the odds of life coming into existence may be, it is inevitable because of infinity," they have crossed from hard science to faith. Eternity and infinity are not real things. They are concepts or ideas. When you have to insert an idea into your equation to make the math work, you might as well say, "God did it."
@@billmcleangunsmith luv that, thanks for taking the time! best 🙌
Spacetime is a four dimensional entity. If we have space, then we have time, and vice versa: if we have time, then we must have space.
The notion that time did not exist before the big bang is not logical. Time is timeless; there is no arbitrary zero point of time. We can obviously rewind to a billion years before the big bang in time.
If we can extend time to before the big bang, then space must also have existed before the big bang, because where we have time, we also have space.
Annoying. When I’ve looked up this answer before I always ran into videos explaining “how dumb the question is because it was nothing”. But now science alots for even crazier ideas
Of course you don’t know but God knows
Which one?
Unless one implies a God. There must of been something weather games that mutated and evolved to become what happened next. Billions of years it took to be where humans are.
Yep sounds more and more like black holes create universes
There is not one Scientist that has a clue on how the Universe came to be. All theories. No one knows.
Not one human in all of creation knows what happens when you die.
@@randmayfield5695 yup
Buda was really alien? he was know even recent discovry😮
Im a 52 year old athiest leaning towards agnostic I see some comments about it wasnt God come on if your a athiest you should really rethink this i was a hardcore athiest though my teens to early 50s maybe there was something probably not what ideal of a religious person concept of a supreme entity but we also discovered 2 trillion galaxies in the observable universe that what changing me be open to a God every time i see new discovers i just dont know 😊
I used to call myself an atheist. I think the real problem for me was religion. Me and God are cool now, we both steer clear of worship.
This isnt the same video i commented to its been changed so to say my comment was to confirm that religion and the belief of god still holds more reality than any scientific speculation witch history has proven so far that what they say is in the past has been proven to be wrong so to belive in witch religion or science of our creation and how it started was proven that the big bang theory was just a science belief witch has as much credibility as the a religious belief but im choseing god first
But of Dark matter ?
Yeah no shit
So, I would just say God created the Big Bang?
Because that is ignorant.
Make it up as they go along
Oh dear
Why " we are sorry " ? Unnecessary drama, it sounds stupid
Anything no matter how irrational or unsubstantiated would be accepted…except for God.
The real mystery is not the Universe, the real mystery is there rejection of God.
Any evidence for God would be twisted as proving ‘no need for God’.
Can’t get something from nothing
Its wild how much they pump out new innovations in the subject matter and still don't realize it points to the Light of World - Yeshua
These videos are basically to educate religious people. God is the universe and vice versa. Except conversations about reality cannot be held if all the person rants about is god this god that enough with that god crap already there is more to understand than that and you are shallow headed if the word god is all you use to define every aspect of existence. Sure god did it, farts smell, sound is loud and light is bright there are mechanics behind the forces of nature and a god used to describe them gets humanity no where.
The fool thinks there is no God but he inherited his mind from nothing!
I could have told you so, the universe has no beginning nor end it has always been like God has always been , the Alfa and Omega!
wow I been first to post a bunch lately, very rare ... cool ..hello from Idaho, now b4 you go hating on Idaho ..its actually a beautiful mountainous state.
I only hate Idaho because you felt the need to mention it
The BB theory was just that. A THEORY! It’s never been proven as fact and I for one never bought it anyway.
A theory in the context of science is significantly different from the common vernacular usage of the word.
Everything you've ever used in your life was constructed based on theories.
Facts are something else entirely; a theory can contain facts, but it cannot be a fact on its own.
No it's not even a theory. Atleast not a good one. A real scientific theory can be observed, repeated, but not fully proved. We can't verry well observe and repeat a BIG BANG so it's just a thought of what may have happened. Now you can call that a theory if you wish but I do not consider it a legitimate sceintific theory
All those fantastical theories to try and explain the unexplainable! To stick to the gravity model neutron stars are supposed to spin around there axis in second or sub second times...is that even possible? Uy scuti one of the most massive solar bodies known, billions of times the mass of the sun is that even possible, wont it implode on itself in the gravity model of things? I have given up on reading about this stuff , cause i know there is a great chance it is erroneous!
Some theories are more established than laws. The fact that you say “only theory” means you do not know what theory means
It's nonsense.
Ive said it before and ill say it again..this Universe was spawned from a previous Universe and i can explain to you how..its not turtles all the way down..its previous Universes..Penrose is close but not quite there yet..
Yes and they make series about it now, but a cute theory, but false. Just chill, multiple universes lol. Just map our universe ok? Then start talk about other universes. We have only discovered 8% of the seas , not even the debt of the seas are mapped except with a suspicious Ecco