Hiii. does is mean that other options are supportinf and strengthening the argument? I mean that is actually really tough to think of an non-stated evidence. (in other words, to think of an evidence that is somewhere in the air but not in the passage)
No, the other options do not necessarily strengthen the argument. I think there might be one or maybe two of the wrong answers that do that, and then the others would just be irrelevant (i.e., they would not strengthen or weaken it). I do see what you mean about non-stated evidence. I think it would be hard to think of the specific evidence cited in the correct. However, with practice, it is possible to identify potential gaps such as the one in this question (i.e., the assumption that the performance was a faithful rendering of the written score).
Thx !
Hiii. does is mean that other options are supportinf and strengthening the argument? I mean that is actually really tough to think of an non-stated evidence. (in other words, to think of an evidence that is somewhere in the air but not in the passage)
No, the other options do not necessarily strengthen the argument. I think there might be one or maybe two of the wrong answers that do that, and then the others would just be irrelevant (i.e., they would not strengthen or weaken it).
I do see what you mean about non-stated evidence. I think it would be hard to think of the specific evidence cited in the correct. However, with practice, it is possible to identify potential gaps such as the one in this question (i.e., the assumption that the performance was a faithful rendering of the written score).
thank you so much that was very informative.😄
tnx sir
i couldn't understand,sir