EQUAL DIGNITISM ? Regarding judging efficiency It may happen a president of a particular country can show more efficiency than a farmer in agriculture or a farmer may show more efficiency than a president in the administration of the country. But being so the word “eligible” cannot be used in this way between two or more persons without mentioning the same or particular professions or works or subjects or fields. It cannot be said in common that a president is more qualified or unqualified than a farmer or DC is more qualified or unqualified than a Rickshaw puller among various professions or works . In order to ascertain who can run better between two persons, the concerned persons should be made to run in a competition and when we compare who first runs ahead another in a given time based a particular distance and then it can be measured who did better than another or who is more qualified or more efficient than another or who did less better or less qualified or less efficient than the other in the matter of run between these two runners. So, when it is found in a democratic country a deputy commissioner is getting more salary than his / her office orderly and an university teacher is getting more salary than a primary school teacher or a president is getting more salary than his / her body guard and then it must mean : financial discriminatory laws are still now being made by the wrong application of the word “qualification”?.
জয় গুরু ,,, জয় হোক মহাত্মা সাধক লালন সাইজির
জয় গুরু
জয় হোক সাঁইজীর
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
অসাধারণ। জয়গুরু জয়লালন জয়জগত।
জয় গুরু দরদী
ধন্যবাদ আপনাকে
প্রেমও ভক্তি জানায় আপনার প্রতি
অসাধারণ লালন শাহ আপনার কথায় ঠিক
ধন্যবাদ আপনাকে
প্রেমও ভক্তি রইলো আপনার ভালোবাসার প্রতি
জয় গুরু ❤❤❤
জয় হোক সাধু গুরুর
জয় গুরু
ধন্যবাদ আপনাকে
প্রেমও ভক্তি রইলো আপনার ভালোবাসার প্রতি
আপনাকে মন থেকে ভালবাসা দিয়ে আরও বহুদূরে এগিয়ে নিতে চাই, ধন্যবাদ দিয়ে ছোট করার ক্ষমতা আমার মাঝে নেই দাদা ❤️❤️
জয় গুরু দরদী
প্রেমও ভক্তি রইলো আপনার ভালোবাসা প্রতি
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
জয় হোক মানবধর্মের,,,,,,❤❤❤
জয় হোক সাধু গুরুর
জয় গুরু
ধন্যবাদ আপনাকে
প্রেমও ভক্তি রইলো আপনার ভালোবাসার প্রতি
Osadharon hoise,,vai,,doa kori amr vaitake doyal aroo onk dur niye jak,,,❤️❤️❤️❤️
ধন্যবাদ আপু
প্রেমও ভক্তি রইলো আপু
😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
ধন্যবাদ আপনাকে
প্রেমও ভক্তি জানায় আপনার ভালোবাসার প্রতি
নিশানা ঠিক করেই তো ডাকতে হবে ভ্যানিশা নায় কি ঢাকা যায়
জয় গুরু
ধন্যবাদ আপনাকে
প্রেমও ভক্তি রইলো আপনার প্রতি
EQUAL DIGNITISM ?
Regarding judging efficiency It may happen a president of a particular country can show more efficiency than a farmer in agriculture or a farmer may show more efficiency than a president in the administration of the country. But being so the word “eligible” cannot be used in this way between two or more persons without mentioning the same or particular professions or works or subjects or fields. It cannot be said in common that a president is more qualified or unqualified than a farmer or DC is more qualified or unqualified than a Rickshaw puller among various professions or works . In order to ascertain who can run better between two persons, the concerned persons should be made to run in a competition and when we compare who first runs ahead another in a given time based a particular distance and then it can be measured who did better than another or who is more qualified or more efficient than another or who did less better or less qualified or less efficient than the other in the matter of run between these two runners.
So, when it is found in a democratic country a deputy commissioner is getting more salary than his / her office orderly and an university teacher is getting more salary than a primary school teacher or a president is getting more salary than his / her body guard and then it must mean : financial discriminatory laws are still now being made by the wrong application of the word “qualification”?.