Dr Kaku, please come back and start posting again more frequently. Although I'm guessing you've been busy cracking the codes of the universe so we can be so selfish.
He’s one of the greatest science communicators and educators. He’s not only brilliant, but he, unlike some other scientists, has an open mind. Thank you, Professor!
Well if you want the truth are you willing to talk about life and death and depression? Mass shootings?😐human nature the illusion of black holes the illusion of space and time ? The illusion of dark matter and energy ?😐then say RED 😐but if you say BLUE the story ends and you go back to your bead whatever you want to believe rather it’s true or not 😐as with people you think we are so special 🙃but we are not 😑and that’s the problem you can’t accept 😑as the universe DOES NOT CARE😑
Why isn’t the theory of galaxy formation called into question instead, given that the environment in the early days of the Universe, when it was still dark, was probably very different to the one we observe today. Couldn’t their dynamics have been different? When they say “We shouldn’t be observing this” they are assuming that the “later” physics of galaxy formation also held back then (during the dark ages), but that is only an assumption. I wonder about this.
Ultimately, any explanation of the universe or our own individual existences resolves to a singular question: "WHAT IS THE PLAUSBILITY OF AN EVENT THAT OCCURS ONLY ONCE?"
@5:57 on those maybe's we should also invest in preserving Earth in ways such as cleaning the oceans, maintaining the fisheries, you could say the same for rivers and lakes, deforestation.. Its high time for better waste management as well as industrial waste management. This my friends is a big deal, no a huge deal as the world is getting smaller in terms of population growth etc
thanks Dr Porfessor Kaku - for trying and even Achieving - save the Future. i will Miss you Dr Kaku - when - old age lost, i miss my grand parents as well. there is a Heaven , you prove that.
The total mass M needed to reconcile gravitational and electrostatic states is M = Mo /(2Pi - 1) (alpha2), where Mo is the observed mass of the universe, (2Pi - 1) is the Bell inequality (ever an inequality in the macroscopic world), and (alpha2) is the square of the fine-structure constant (a optical magnification factor, twice applied for virtual and real expression). In the quantum realm, the equation is undefined, because the radius is equal to the circumference, meaning that Pi = 1/2. The number of unit circles (or squares) in the universe is M/m, where m is the present-day rest mass of the electron. For a unit circle to become a unit square, Buffon's needle problem becomes applicable, where one side is electrostatic and the other is gravitational. In order for the PROBABILITY to equal 1/2 (regarding Bell's inequality AND Buffon's problem), Pi = 4, meaning that Pi = 1/2 AND Pi = 4, implying that 1 = 8; hence, the qubit (used in quantum computing) is emergent. (My observations and derivations-- no citation needed.)
I believe black holes can give birth to new galaxies ! for example the black hole in the center of our galaxy can effect star formation in our surrounding dwarf galaxies ! You could probably see this if you had a map of the cosmic webs !
As for the age of the universe, I've read that our Solar System rotates around the galaxy once about every 250 million years. That means that in approximately 5 billion years, it has existed, it has circled the galaxy only 20 times. Or, in our galaxy s age, it has rotated only about 50 times. I'm not even close to being an astrophysicist, but just looking at pictures of similar galaxies tells me that these galaxies have been spinning for a long time, maybe hundreds or thousands of times. Is there a way to determine how many revolutions a galaxy has made?
Really interesting stuff, that really flips everything on its head... I'm not super shocked, that we don't know as much as we first thought, b/c space is a numbers games, and humanity is really losing against it right now.
Energy can't be destroyed, only transformed. In a Black Hole, is it possible that all the matter that falls in which forms a singularly, that another universe is created from that singularity?
I have a question. Why does light pass through glass? Its a hard, dense substance. You would think it blocks light and everything else. Compare that to a thin piece of tin foil that blocks it entirely.
If the Milky way has a Billion stars....and these "Younger " Galaxies can be up to 10 times the size? Yes any reality you can imagine, exsists! Somewhere at some time, or even currently, right in the now.
The closest thing to absolute certainty is found in abstract math (in application, there is always an uncertainty, like when counting apples). The best that can be done in the real world is to bet on the odds, while accepting the risk. BOTTOM-UP (Big Bang) cosmology had bet on smaller primal galaxies with the JWST, and lost; whereas, TOP-DOWN cosmology PREDICTED larger primal galaxies, and won. Betting on the odds, TOP-DOWN WINS-- no need for citation because relating the definition of "TOP-DOWN" to the JWST findings of larger primal galaxies is a NEAR TAUTOLOGY!
BTW, the inner core is NOT spinning in the opposite direction. That would not even be physically possible. It's spinning at a slightly faster rate, a fact demonstrated by Glatzmaier and Roberts back in the 1990s. Oh, to you Kaku groupies - yes, I know what I'm talking about - I wrote my doctorate on the geodynamo.
Per Wiki: "Two centuries ago, a somewhat obscure Scotsman named Tytler made this profound observation: 'A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury. After that, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits with the result the democracy collapses because of the loose fiscal policy ensuing, always to be followed by a dictatorship, then a monarchy.'" This is more-than-coincidentally the estimated amount of time it would take for a competitive and hence intelligently evolved tribal mentality to devolve into an idiocracy.
Suppose someone had actually predicted a result like this. How would the proposal have been received? It's increasingly clear that we are still in the dark about some basic cosmological facts and principles. It shouldn't surprise us that leading, authoritative theories about fundamental physical matters are subject to human falliblity. It's a safe bet that human knowledge encompasses far less than it thinks it does at any moment in history. We should rejoice that our favorite theories about fundamental questions could always get blown out of the water. Now, when can the James Webb telescope give us a new look at HD 44179 and MWC 922? If, with Kaku, we seriously entertain the potential existence of the types of civilizations proposed by the Kardashev Scale, then we should also be able to consider the possibility that structures like MWC 922 (the Red Square Nebula), HD 44179 (the Red Rectangle Nebula), and WR 140 are stellar geometrical monuments produced by one or more very advanced intelligent species. They just might be somebody's way of saying, to anyone who can see them across large distances in time and space, "We are (or were) here!" We should be able to openly entertain possibilities like these as questions or hypotheses, without fear of ridicule or career damage. We needn't leap to a conclusion one way or the other merely by thinking them and discussing them intelligently. Examples of how to do this need only be set by a few eminent, elder astrophysicists who already have their pensions.
What nonsense. Black hole "physics" is a division by zero mistake. I learned that in elementary school. Too smart for their own good. Einstein made a math error and now it's ingrained. It is always more difficult to unlearn an error then discover truth.
Hydrogen-rich stars and galaxies of equivalent mass, respectively, previously and inappropriately deemed to be colliding under BOTTOM UP (BBT) cosmology are actually and appropriately DIVIDING under TOP DOWN cosmology, which respects and predicts this behavior from evolutionary changes regarding critical masses (witness our own galaxy and Andromeda, representing main sequence evolution).
I have proposed universal dichotomy since 1979 to no avail. In addition to explaining the origin of the Universe, it also explains the origin of life, as dichotomy is the most primitive expression of the beginning of life (universe turned inward, surviving a ever-changing environment by recapitulation of universal evolution through birth, death, and rebirth). It is so obvious, but completely ignored in the current paradigm. I simply call this TOP DOWN THEORY "The Origin Theory" as an extension of Darwin's contribution
I'm no expert, but doesn't the fact that matter present half a billion years after the big bang being more consentrated and less dispersed as the universe would not have expanded as much at that earlier point in time space, explain the size and potentially faster development of these ancient galaxies relatively easily?
Either TOP DOWN cosmology or BOTTOM UP (BBT) cosmology will endure the test of time. There can be no "sitting on the fence." My TOP DOWN cosmology is either terribly wrong, or mostly right. To date, I have seen only affirmations accompanied by fulfilled predictions.
I think Albert Einstein was wrong when he claimed that God does not roll dice with his creation when everything belongs to the electron of the universe and man can choose to destroy planet earth with, for example, world war.
As this site is being trolled, I again post: The closest thing to absolute certainty is found in abstract math (in application, there is always an uncertainty, like when counting apples). The best that can be done in the real world is to bet on the odds, while accepting the risk. BOTTOM-UP (Big Bang) cosmology had bet on smaller primal galaxies with the JWST, and lost; whereas, TOP-DOWN cosmology PREDICTED larger primal galaxies, and won. Betting on the odds, TOP-DOWN WINS-- no need for citation because relating the definition of "TOP-DOWN" to the JWST findings of larger primal galaxies is a NEAR TAUTOLOGY!
A quantum closed-loop string is 2Pi, where the radius is equal to the circumference and a unit circle EXISTS, but has no radius or circumference-- it reconciles (instantaneous) quantum entanglement of gravitational and electrostatic forces, but is paradoxically undefined in the equation expressing the mass needed to reconcile those same forces: M = Mo/ (2Pi - 1)(alpha2), expressed in my previous posts, heretofore.
I find it interesting that people are amazed that information "science" that is done by best guess, could be wrong or flawed. Look up what theory means. A theory can be completely wrong or fabricated because it is a individual or a group of individuals attempting to explain the unexplainable threw math, which is in itself incomplete and flawed. As a true scientist, I see all theorys as nothing more than incomplete flawed misinformation that needs further data before being accepted as truth or fiction.
I always knew the universe was way way wayy older than a measly 13 billion… maybe our galaxy could be around 13 billion, thats what i think their measuring when they think their measuring the age, our universe is possibly eternal, our minds cant comprehend eternity so were always going to be looking for a finite measurement
Since the universe began with a singularity, if that singularity was a Big Bang, then all of the currently-observable order is required to “self-assemble” from the resultant hot chaos-“allowed” because, though extremely improbable, it is not theoretically prohibited.
I don’t believe that!
My theory starts with a singularity where everything is connected into a single mass that initially divides into two, like in cell division, but with smaller masses with each division, united by proto-gravity. (Gravity and light were indistinguishable in the beginning.) If in choosing between the two, one of the theories contains a “unwanted message,” that “everything is connected,” then the former theory would be preferred (with blinders on), thereby conceivably allowing a misinformed majority to be manipulated for power and selfish gain by a elite minority.
Sir, you're never going to know exactly when earthquakes are happening, however with a little bit more concerns for human beings y'all could allow for safer structural designs and better locations that supports human habitation.🤔
Attributing the recently-detected, early, larger, well-formed galaxies to Big-Bang-induced "black holes" is not unlike the obfuscation of the ancient cosmic argument that "it is turtles all the way down!" 🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢
You don’t need the JWST to understand the age of the universe pal ANYONE can do it 😑you just have to ask the right questions 😐as I don’t need the JWST for that all you need is basic thinking 😑as for the earth is 4.6 billion years old 😐and all we determined the age of the universe is light but light alone does NOT determine age 😑as you think everything in your house glows when it’s dark ?😐no 😑the universe works the same way 😐not all elements produce light as a bi product 😑their is no dark energy or dark matter 😑if we know then We would have created it in our labs and even so that does NOT mean it’s natural 😑as what astronomers don’t understand is the use of geometric dating and even so the elements can change 😐as it depends on the size shape and mass of the object 😐as for galaxies and such the bigger the object the older it is as well as many other factors 😐that’s the illusion of the universe you people think we are living the final stage a dead universe but the truth is it’s not 😑the truth is is objects are SO BIG that if you were to look at them it would look like as if they are dead but in reality they are active 😐it’s the harsh truth no human will NEVER see the whole universe change 😑as even 4.6 billion years is nothing 😐and based on the REAL Drake equation of 14 billion years then all your saying is every 14 billion years we will be born again witch I would disagree and even so so space and time are just constructs😑I know you you can’t accept that but I’m just telling you the truth 😑you don’t need the JWST or technology to explain basic things about the universe 😑the answer to your problems have Ben right in front of you the whole time 😐you just have to accept the truth and take the RED pill as if you say BLUE you will be ALWAYS lying 😑and just going in circles and just say I don’t know 😑as I personally respect those who tell the truth NO MATTER HOW HARSH 😐I would rather respect scientists that say we don’t know then just making up excuses 😑
The cross of Christ will be the science and the song of the redeemed through all eternity. In Christ glorified they will behold Christ crucified. Never will it be forgotten that He whose power created and upheld the unnumbered worlds through the vast realms of space, the Beloved of God, the Majesty of Heaven, He whom cherub and shining seraph delighted to adore,-humbled himself to uplift fallen man; that he bore the guilt and shame of sin, and the hiding of his Father’s face, till the woes of a lost world broke his heart, and crushed out his life on Calvary’s cross. That the Maker of all worlds, the Arbiter of all destinies, should lay aside his glory, and humiliate himself from love to man, will ever excite the wonder and adoration of the universe. As the nations of the saved look upon their Redeemer, and behold the eternal glory of the Father shining in his countenance; as they behold his throne, which is from everlasting to everlasting, and know that his kingdom is to have no end, they break forth in rapturous song, “Worthy, worthy is the Lamb that was slain, and hath redeemed us to God by his own most precious blood!” GC88 651.2 There, immortal minds will contemplate with never-failing delight the wonders of creative power, the mysteries of redeeming love. There will be no cruel, deceiving foe to tempt to forgetfulness of God. Every faculty will be developed, every capacity increased. The acquirement of knowledge will not weary the mind or exhaust the energies. There the grandest enterprises may be carried forward, the loftiest aspirations reached, the highest ambitions realized; and still there will arise new heights to surmount, new wonders to admire, new truths to comprehend, fresh objects to call forth the powers of mind and soul and body. GC 677.2 All the treasures of the universe will be open to the study of God’s redeemed. Unfettered by mortality, they wing their tireless flight to worlds afar-worlds that thrilled with sorrow at the spectacle of human woe and rang with songs of gladness at the tidings of a ransomed soul. With unutterable delight the children of earth enter into the joy and the wisdom of unfallen beings. They share the treasures of knowledge and understanding gained through ages upon ages in contemplation of God’s handiwork. With undimmed vision they gaze upon the glory of creation-suns and stars and systems, all in their appointed order circling the throne of Deity. Upon all things, from the least to the greatest, the Creator’s name is written, and in all are the riches of His power displayed. GC 677.3 And the years of eternity, as they roll, will bring richer and still more glorious revelations of God and of Christ. As knowledge is progressive, so will love, reverence, and happiness increase. The more men learn of God, the greater will be their admiration of His character. As Jesus opens before them the riches of redemption and the amazing achievements in the great controversy with Satan, the hearts of the ransomed thrill with more fervent devotion, and with more rapturous joy they sweep the harps of gold; and ten thousand times ten thousand and thousands of thousands of voices unite to swell the mighty chorus of praise. GC 678.1 “And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, heard I saying, Blessing, and honor, and glory, and power, be unto Him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever.” Revelation 5:13. GC 678.2 The great controversy is ended. Sin and sinners are no more. The entire universe is clean. One pulse of harmony and gladness beats through the vast creation. From Him who created all, flow life and light and gladness, throughout the realms of illimitable space. From the minutest atom to the greatest world, all things, animate and inanimate, in their unshadowed beauty and perfect joy, declare that God is love. GC 678.3 I highly recommend 'Conflict of the Ages' series of five books by Christian Author Ellen G. White (Authentic Seer/Prophet of God)..... "The Great Controversy between Christ and Satan" Ellen G.White, 1888, rev.1911
The past has everything to do with the course of the future. The past be truly known, humans would not be doing what they are currently doing to this planet. The life cycle of birth, expression and death is necessary for any organism to evolve and survive into the future. The limit to life expectancy is completely dependent upon the rate of change for the physical constants and the implications for DNA replication. This evolution is known as TOP DOWN cosmology. This is near certain: Imagine a universe beginning with a single "particle" of gigantic mass that spontaneously divides into two smaller masses (with a field that obviously must exist to unite them, like, say, primordial electrostatic gravity, a quantum relationship modulo 2). Imagine that over "time" the process of division continues, producing "newer," lighter "particles" (and forces that unite them "programmed" for future expression within when, per chance, they are irrationally unreconcilable by quantum counting) over "time." (Note: That cascade of particles is presently observed as "nuclear decay," where heavier elements spontaneously cascade into a spectrum of heavier-to-lighter elements.) To see how rapidly the NUMBER of observed particles (of increasingly smaller mass) can grow in a short amount of time, just multiply 2 x 2 = repeatedly on a small calculator-- in a very short time the numbers go off the scale! Just imagine, then, IN THE PROCESS OF DIVIDING, heavier masses, that eventually form galaxies, divide over time (seemingly coming from "nowhere") at each epoch of division (and extinction). This process is known as "TOP DOWN cosmology." In the end, you have present-day smaller galaxies, PLUS the cosmic heat signature of NOW-EXTINCT past elements (including galaxies), known today as the "cosmic microwave background radiation." (Note: Smaller early galaxies are required by BOTTOM UP big bang cosmology, where predicted smaller primal galaxies form larger galaxies over time, and where the predicted cosmic microwave background radiation would be "smooth;" HOWEVER, the OBSERVED cosmic background radiation is actually "lumpy," and OBSERVED primal galaxies are actually larger.) TOP DOWN cosmology wins! PS: I call this theory "The Origin Theory," as an extension of Darwin's "Origin of the Species." Please leave the ultimate origin and direction of our currently-complex universe (either with TOP DOWN or BOTTOM UP cosmology) to lesser-probabilities of 50/50, so as not to "throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Given that the latest "breakthrough" in fusion technology recklessly announces controlled fusion energy when it provides ignition WITHOUT accounting for energy out Vs TOTAL energy in (I still remember "cold fusion"), My TOP DOWN theory of cosmology says that in order to reconcile static gravitational and Coulomb effects (a valid grand unification theory goal) there is a value, a number R, such that Ke^2 = RGm^2, where K is the Coulomb constant, e^2 is the square of the charge on an electron, G is the universal gravitational constant and m^2 is the square of rest mass of an electron-- what can be simpler than that!. The calculated value of R is 4.16574 x 10^42. Given my TOP DOWN cosmology, then, Coulomb effects are 4.16574 x 10^42 times more intense than gravitational effects, meaning that local ignition, compression and containment needed for sustained fusion reactions are collectively unattainable. Clearly, the evolutionary direction of the universe must be countered and reversed to sustain a local fusion reaction-- a physical impossibility! Yet, much money and time is being WASTED on attempts to "find a way," apparently to justify continued reckless population growth on this fragile planet. (The problem does not exist with fission reactions, which have their own set of intractable problems, because energy release follows the direction of universal evolution.)
What is R? Numbers and predictive ability matter (rather than finding explanation after a discovery, presently being done with BOTTOM UP BBT): Per my TOP DOWN cosmology, the radius of the universe on a quantum level is R = Root (M/m), where M is the total mass of the universe needed to unite gravitational and electrostatic forces and m is the rest-mass of an electron, yielding, Ke^2/ R^2 = RGm^2/ R^2, where R^2 is the square of R. The calculated mass at a quantum level, including "missing mass," is M = 1.58079 x 10^55 power Kg, and the calculated radius of the quantum realm is R = 4.16574 x 10^42 power measured in instantaneous, dimensionless units. (M is undefined in the quantum realm, yet partially discernable as the observed mass Mo of the universe in the macroscopic world,). The number of unit circles (or squares) in the quantum realm is R^2 = 1.73534 x 10^85 power. It is a quantum attribute that area of unit squares and number of unit squares are indistinguishable (No need for citation, as all stated derivations are my own.) Everything is separating visually by such distance that the presence of extra-terrestrial life is very difficult to detect, yet everything has always been quantum-connected ("not locally real"). The total mass M needed to reconcile gravitational and electrostatic states is M = Mo /(2Pi - 1) (alpha^2), where Mo is the OBSERVABLE mass of the universe, (2Pi - 1) is the Bell inequality (ever an inequality in the macroscopic world, and equivalent to Euler's "proof of God" in the quantum realm, where M is UNDEFINED), and (alpha^2) is the square of the fine-structure constant (a optical magnification factor, twice applied for virtual and real expression). In the quantum realm, the equation is undefined, because the radius is equal to the circumference, meaning that Pi = 1/2. The number of unit circles (or squares) in the universe is M/m, where m is the present-day rest mass of the electron. For a unit circle to become a unit square, Buffon's needle problem becomes applicable, where one side is electrostatic and the other is gravitational. In order for the PROBABILITY to equal 1/2 (regarding Bell's inequality AND Buffon's problem), Pi = 4, meaning that Pi = 1/2 AND Pi = 4, implying that 1 = 8; hence, the qubit (used in quantum computing) is emergent. (My observations and derivations-- no citation needed.) Using my TOP DOWN cosmology, the rate of change of alpha is -2.7958 x 10^-17/ year, based upon a perceived age of the universe of 13.799 x 10^9 years. For very large R the definite integral of R over time T approaching origin of the universe to the present day is approximately 1/2 of R^2, verifying perceived dichotomy (a weird quantum nuance, where areas AND number of unit circles or squares are indistinguishable).
In the quantum realm, the term (2Pi - 1) = 0 can also be considered as the sidereal rotation of a unit circle within a unit circle (created by Buffon's needle drop probability).
As a physicist, I have been promoting this TOP DOWN model since1979. For those who would state (not me) that this is a "fun theory" (with its fulfilled prediction of larger primordial galaxies), demanding the math; then, when presented with the mathematical model finding the much-sought-after hidden "missing mass" and quantum gravity, implying that I am a mathematician with little relevance to physics: The physical world can instruct the mathematical world, IMO. In addition to reconciling the Coulomb constant and the universal gravitational constant, I have explained the significance of the little-understood fine structure constant, alpha. If you would simply "run with it," you have the information to calculate the age and rate of expansion of the universe (much older than the presently-accepted age of the universe, hidden by quantum effects).
Here are three obvious "predictions:"
-Per TOP DOWN cosmology, there is understandably a paucity of antimatter in the local universe.
-Hydrogen-rich stars and galaxies of equivalent mass, respectively, previously and inappropriately deemed to be colliding under BOTTOM UP (BBT) cosmology are actually and appropriately DIVIDING under TOP DOWN cosmology, which respects and predicts this behavior from evolutionary changes regarding critical mass (witness our own galaxy and Andromeda, representing main sequence evolution).
-The current abundance of elements is reconciled by main-sequence TOP DOWN evolution, not requiring multiple solar cycles, exceeding even the presently-accepted age of the universe per BOTTOM UP BBT.
There are no absolutes (a logical dilemma in itself). The closest thing to absolute certainty is found in abstract math-- in application there is always an uncertainty (like when counting apples). The best that can be expected in the physical world is to "bet on the odds." Given my TOP DOWN cosmology, odds are for things dividing rather than melding regarding cosmic events; whereas, there is every inclination for one schooled in BOTTOM UP BBT to look for, and prejudicially expect observed galaxies and stars to be colliding. Regarding dark energy: The hidden quantum world, which reveals itself as "locally not real" (Nobel Prize already given), contains a memory of the past in our own DNA, for example, revealed in morphogenesis ("ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny"), "betting on the odds." Dr. Rupert Sheldrake describes this as "morphic fields" and "morphic resonance." BTW, His theory accounts for why the Kelly astronaut twins are no longer DNA-identical twins, where there is no other better explanation that I have seen being offered-- instead, relegating any explanation to the growing category of "unexplained mysteries!"
I am the watcher over the milky way district. Al will bow to me. All will kneel to him. all old aches and pains washed away. Warning it is intense Jesus power . Only reply if u want the proof
Do most physicists agree that black holes are simply super dense spheres of mass not unlike neutron stars whose neutrons are touching neutrons with no apparent motion, black holes have another level of gravity and density that has the quarks and gluons pressed together with no remaining apparent motion or vibrations at all that have become dense enough that their event horizon diameter exceeds the sphere’s diameter, going black from our view? I think Einstein's wrong, that time is constant and that dark matter is the limiting factor to the speed of light. I think it’s not 'space-time' bending but rather gravitational and dark matter density variations.
![State of Play | September 24, 2024 [ENGLISH]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/fVs0suPHAX8/mqdefault.jpg)
Dr Kaku, please come back and start posting again more frequently. Although I'm guessing you've been busy cracking the codes of the universe so we can be so selfish.
Dr. Kaku is a gift to humanity. Thank you for existing, Doctor.
Kaku is the best. Legendary indeed.
KAKU- a REAL SCIENTIST!!! "we may have to revise our theories" !!!! A man to be TRUSTED!!!!!
Finally a new vid after 7 months
He’s one of the greatest science communicators and educators. He’s not only brilliant, but he, unlike some other scientists, has an open mind. Thank you, Professor!
Most scientists are pretty excited about new discoveries. Do you have anyone specific in mind?
The beauty of science is that it's flexible in gaining knowledge,and the truth.
And willing to evolve as we learn more and more...
Well if you want the truth are you willing to talk about life and death and depression? Mass shootings?😐human nature the illusion of black holes the illusion of space and time ? The illusion of dark matter and energy ?😐then say RED 😐but if you say BLUE the story ends and you go back to your bead whatever you want to believe rather it’s true or not 😐as with people you think we are so special 🙃but we are not 😑and that’s the problem you can’t accept 😑as the universe DOES NOT CARE😑
2:59 Gotta love how they bring up a box labeled "universe facts" but the whole point of the video is that everything the box lists is under question
Kaku is a genious with a open mind and a mind that never says never , we all need a uncle kaku 👍👍
Always fascinating to listen to Dr Kaku.
Nice to see you back in youtube Dr. Michio! :)
Thank you as always Mitchio and take care
Love you Mr. Kaku!
Huge respect to Mr Michio Kaku!
We need more videos 📹.
Book compinys will love this. $$$$
What total fun!!!! It's just miraculous when you get knocked on your scientific can! Such fun!!!
this is so great i love this video it just proves theres always more to learn which is so exciting
Why isn’t the theory of galaxy formation called into question instead, given that the environment in the early days of the Universe, when it was still dark, was probably very different to the one we observe today. Couldn’t their dynamics have been different? When they say “We shouldn’t be observing this” they are assuming that the “later” physics of galaxy formation also held back then (during the dark ages), but that is only an assumption. I wonder about this.
Genesis 1.
It's a multi big bang situation and the tail end of one bang has entered the early section of our big bang.
Ultimately, any explanation of the universe or our own individual existences resolves to a singular question: "WHAT IS THE PLAUSBILITY OF AN EVENT THAT OCCURS ONLY ONCE?"
So much more fascinating than, goddunit. We should be proud about what we have learned, through people like Professor Kaku.
Discovering how "goddunit" is doubly fascinating.
@5:57 on those maybe's we should also invest in preserving Earth in ways such as cleaning the oceans, maintaining the fisheries, you could say the same for rivers and lakes, deforestation.. Its high time for better waste management as well as industrial waste management. This my friends is a big deal, no a huge deal as the world is getting smaller in terms of population growth etc
all great points
My hero michio!
I miss his show on PBS. It was great.
thanks Dr Porfessor Kaku - for trying and even Achieving - save the Future. i will Miss you Dr Kaku - when - old age lost, i miss my grand parents as well. there is a Heaven , you prove that.
The total mass M needed to reconcile gravitational and electrostatic states is M = Mo /(2Pi - 1) (alpha2), where Mo is the observed mass of the universe, (2Pi - 1) is the Bell inequality (ever an inequality in the macroscopic world), and (alpha2) is the square of the fine-structure constant (a optical magnification factor, twice applied for virtual and real expression). In the quantum realm, the equation is undefined, because the radius is equal to the circumference, meaning that Pi = 1/2. The number of unit circles (or squares) in the universe is M/m, where m is the present-day rest mass of the electron. For a unit circle to become a unit square, Buffon's needle problem becomes applicable, where one side is electrostatic and the other is gravitational. In order for the PROBABILITY to equal 1/2 (regarding Bell's inequality AND Buffon's problem), Pi = 4, meaning that Pi = 1/2 AND Pi = 4, implying that 1 = 8; hence, the qubit (used in quantum computing) is emergent. (My observations and derivations-- no citation needed.)
are you a theoretical physicist
Have they considered the possibility that someone accidentally shifted the JWST into reverse and it's actually looking forward in time?
I believe black holes can give birth to new galaxies ! for example the black hole in the center of our galaxy can effect star formation in our surrounding dwarf galaxies ! You could probably see this if you had a map of the cosmic webs !
Who is the interviewer?
As for the age of the universe, I've read that our Solar System rotates around the galaxy once about every 250 million years. That means that in approximately 5 billion years, it has existed, it has circled the galaxy only 20 times. Or, in our galaxy s age, it has rotated only about 50 times. I'm not even close to being an astrophysicist, but just looking at pictures of similar galaxies tells me that these galaxies have been spinning for a long time, maybe hundreds or thousands of times. Is there a way to determine how many revolutions a galaxy has made?
Really interesting stuff, that really flips everything on its head... I'm not super shocked, that we don't know as much as we first thought, b/c space is a numbers games, and humanity is really losing against it right now.
The riddle of the age of distant galaxies and the universe will eventuallly be solved by science and researchers like Dr. Kaku.
I'm confused, aren't super massive black holes usually at the center of galaxies?
With added information, new proposals and conclusions may be warranted.
Energy can't be destroyed, only transformed. In a Black Hole, is it possible that all the matter that falls in which forms a singularly, that another universe is created from that singularity?
I have a question. Why does light pass through glass? Its a hard, dense substance. You would think it blocks light and everything else. Compare that to a thin piece of tin foil that blocks it entirely.
"...something is wrong..." We are... again. 😋 Keep at it guys.
How is the Earths inner core anything new? I learned about that in my science degree years ago.
John 1:5
New King James Version
"And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not [a]comprehend it."
If the Milky way has a Billion stars....and these "Younger " Galaxies can be up to 10 times the size? Yes any reality you can imagine, exsists! Somewhere at some time, or even currently, right in the now.
I am baffled.
🔥🔥🔥
The Levinthal paradox shattered the understanding of the age of the universe way back in 1969.
It shattered the notion that it could have occurred by chance.
AMAZING...GOOD RE WRITE THE BOOKS 🙏👆💟🛸👽🗑
As he said we're theorizing..
I haven't seen Kaku do videos recently, what is he up to these days?
The closest thing to absolute certainty is found in abstract math (in application, there is always an uncertainty, like when counting apples). The best that can be done in the real world is to bet on the odds, while accepting the risk. BOTTOM-UP (Big Bang) cosmology had bet on smaller primal galaxies with the JWST, and lost; whereas, TOP-DOWN cosmology PREDICTED larger primal galaxies, and won. Betting on the odds, TOP-DOWN WINS-- no need for citation because relating the definition of "TOP-DOWN" to the JWST findings of larger primal galaxies is a NEAR TAUTOLOGY!
BTW, the inner core is NOT spinning in the opposite direction. That would not even be physically possible. It's spinning at a slightly faster rate, a fact demonstrated by Glatzmaier and Roberts back in the 1990s. Oh, to you Kaku groupies - yes, I know what I'm talking about - I wrote my doctorate on the geodynamo.
Per Wiki: "Two centuries ago, a somewhat obscure Scotsman named Tytler made this profound observation: 'A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury. After that, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits with the result the democracy collapses because of the loose fiscal policy ensuing, always to be followed by a dictatorship, then a monarchy.'"
This is more-than-coincidentally the estimated amount of time it would take for a competitive and hence intelligently evolved tribal mentality to devolve into an idiocracy.
You don't need to worry I can't mess this up it's not hard it's just taking me a lil time.
So "Monster black hole" is the new normal?
Suppose someone had actually predicted a result like this. How would the proposal have been received?
It's increasingly clear that we are still in the dark about some basic cosmological facts and principles. It shouldn't surprise us that leading, authoritative theories about fundamental physical matters are subject to human falliblity. It's a safe bet that human knowledge encompasses far less than it thinks it does at any moment in history. We should rejoice that our favorite theories about fundamental questions could always get blown out of the water.
Now, when can the James Webb telescope give us a new look at HD 44179 and MWC 922?
If, with Kaku, we seriously entertain the potential existence of the types of civilizations proposed by the Kardashev Scale, then we should also be able to consider the possibility that structures like MWC 922 (the Red Square Nebula), HD 44179 (the Red Rectangle Nebula), and WR 140 are stellar geometrical monuments produced by one or more very advanced intelligent species. They just might be somebody's way of saying, to anyone who can see them across large distances in time and space, "We are (or were) here!"
We should be able to openly entertain possibilities like these as questions or hypotheses, without fear of ridicule or career damage. We needn't leap to a conclusion one way or the other merely by thinking them and discussing them intelligently. Examples of how to do this need only be set by a few eminent, elder astrophysicists who already have their pensions.
Holey Eternal Omnipresent Greetingz cuzin
What part of we know nothing is difficult to get?
What nonsense. Black hole "physics" is a division by zero mistake. I learned that in elementary school. Too smart for their own good. Einstein made a math error and now it's ingrained. It is always more difficult to unlearn an error then discover truth.
Very cool!! 🌌🌌
I'll keep sending equations thru the internet and maps of the stars
Hydrogen-rich stars and galaxies of equivalent mass, respectively, previously and inappropriately deemed to be colliding under BOTTOM UP (BBT) cosmology are actually and appropriately DIVIDING under TOP DOWN cosmology, which respects and predicts this behavior from evolutionary changes regarding critical masses (witness our own galaxy and Andromeda, representing main sequence evolution).
I have proposed universal dichotomy since 1979 to no avail. In addition to explaining the origin of the Universe, it also explains the origin of life, as dichotomy is the most primitive expression of the beginning of life (universe turned inward, surviving a ever-changing environment by recapitulation of universal evolution through birth, death, and rebirth). It is so obvious, but completely ignored in the current paradigm. I simply call this TOP DOWN THEORY "The Origin Theory" as an extension of Darwin's contribution
I'm no expert, but doesn't the fact that matter present half a billion years after the big bang being more consentrated and less dispersed as the universe would not have expanded as much at that earlier point in time space, explain the size and potentially faster development of these ancient galaxies relatively easily?
Its not billons of years old ....its always been here !!
Either TOP DOWN cosmology or BOTTOM UP (BBT) cosmology will endure the test of time. There can be no "sitting on the fence." My TOP DOWN cosmology is either terribly wrong, or mostly right. To date, I have seen only affirmations accompanied by fulfilled predictions.
"Nothing" is quantum stored history and implicate order. Hardware vs software.
I think Albert Einstein was wrong when he claimed that God does not roll dice with his creation when everything belongs to the electron of the universe and man can choose to destroy planet earth with, for example, world war.
He said creation of the universe?
As this site is being trolled, I again post:
The closest thing to absolute certainty is found in abstract math (in application, there is always an uncertainty, like when counting apples). The best that can be done in the real world is to bet on the odds, while accepting the risk. BOTTOM-UP (Big Bang) cosmology had bet on smaller primal galaxies with the JWST, and lost; whereas, TOP-DOWN cosmology PREDICTED larger primal galaxies, and won. Betting on the odds, TOP-DOWN WINS-- no need for citation because relating the definition of "TOP-DOWN" to the JWST findings of larger primal galaxies is a NEAR TAUTOLOGY!
A quantum closed-loop string is 2Pi, where the radius is equal to the circumference and a unit circle EXISTS, but has no radius or circumference-- it reconciles (instantaneous) quantum entanglement of gravitational and electrostatic forces, but is paradoxically undefined in the equation expressing the mass needed to reconcile those same forces: M = Mo/ (2Pi - 1)(alpha2), expressed in my previous posts, heretofore.
I find it interesting that people are amazed that information "science" that is done by best guess, could be wrong or flawed. Look up what theory means. A theory can be completely wrong or fabricated because it is a individual or a group of individuals attempting to explain the unexplainable threw math, which is in itself incomplete and flawed. As a true scientist, I see all theorys as nothing more than incomplete flawed misinformation that needs further data before being accepted as truth or fiction.
As a true scientist eh....... Give me a break, your idea of what a theory is is so flawed that I can smell the stench of your brain fart.
The earth work as a dynamo.
I always knew the universe was way way wayy older than a measly 13 billion… maybe our galaxy could be around 13 billion, thats what i think their measuring when they think their measuring the age, our universe is possibly eternal, our minds cant comprehend eternity so were always going to be looking for a finite measurement
“You may need to re-sign, Michio ...”.
May want to re-state that, cuckoo.
Oh know, but i thought that "the science was settled" back in 2021
“The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics.
The best solution "against" the eartquakes it's to build "true" buildings and not fakes one.
All telescopes are time machines 🤗
Since the universe began with a singularity, if that singularity was a Big Bang, then all of the currently-observable order is required to “self-assemble” from the resultant hot chaos-“allowed” because, though extremely improbable, it is not theoretically prohibited.
I don’t believe that!
My theory starts with a singularity where everything is connected into a single mass that initially divides into two, like in cell division, but with smaller masses with each division, united by proto-gravity. (Gravity and light were indistinguishable in the beginning.) If in choosing between the two, one of the theories contains a “unwanted message,” that “everything is connected,” then the former theory would be preferred (with blinders on), thereby conceivably allowing a misinformed majority to be manipulated for power and selfish gain by a elite minority.
You can “take that to the bank!”
Sir, you're never going to know exactly when earthquakes are happening, however with a little bit more concerns for human beings y'all could allow for safer structural designs and better locations that supports human habitation.🤔
So the Earth is like a pearl. And that's not really surprising. Considering everything in nature is mirrored somewhere else.
Clone Kaku before it’s to late
It's starting to look more and more like our universe is a holographic simulation every day!!
Attributing the recently-detected, early, larger, well-formed galaxies to Big-Bang-induced "black holes" is not unlike the obfuscation of the ancient cosmic argument that "it is turtles all the way down!" 🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢
Religion take note. Science is not scared to challenge its beliefs, so why not you??
Science doesn't threaten you with eternal damnation. Religion on the other hand...
Lets help me
🦋🌈✨
Cosmic Dawn 🤩
You don’t need the JWST to understand the age of the universe pal ANYONE can do it 😑you just have to ask the right questions 😐as I don’t need the JWST for that all you need is basic thinking 😑as for the earth is 4.6 billion years old 😐and all we determined the age of the universe is light but light alone does NOT determine age 😑as you think everything in your house glows when it’s dark ?😐no 😑the universe works the same way 😐not all elements produce light as a bi product 😑their is no dark energy or dark matter 😑if we know then We would have created it in our labs and even so that does NOT mean it’s natural 😑as what astronomers don’t understand is the use of geometric dating and even so the elements can change 😐as it depends on the size shape and mass of the object 😐as for galaxies and such the bigger the object the older it is as well as many other factors 😐that’s the illusion of the universe you people think we are living the final stage a dead universe but the truth is it’s not 😑the truth is is objects are SO BIG that if you were to look at them it would look like as if they are dead but in reality they are active 😐it’s the harsh truth no human will NEVER see the whole universe change 😑as even 4.6 billion years is nothing 😐and based on the REAL Drake equation of 14 billion years then all your saying is every 14 billion years we will be born again witch I would disagree and even so so space and time are just constructs😑I know you you can’t accept that but I’m just telling you the truth 😑you don’t need the JWST or technology to explain basic things about the universe 😑the answer to your problems have Ben right in front of you the whole time 😐you just have to accept the truth and take the RED pill as if you say BLUE you will be ALWAYS lying 😑and just going in circles and just say I don’t know 😑as I personally respect those who tell the truth NO MATTER HOW HARSH 😐I would rather respect scientists that say we don’t know then just making up excuses 😑
The cross of Christ will be the science and the song of the redeemed through all eternity. In Christ glorified they will behold Christ crucified. Never will it be forgotten that He whose power created and upheld the unnumbered worlds through the vast realms of space, the Beloved of God, the Majesty of Heaven, He whom cherub and shining seraph delighted to adore,-humbled himself to uplift fallen man; that he bore the guilt and shame of sin, and the hiding of his Father’s face, till the woes of a lost world broke his heart, and crushed out his life on Calvary’s cross. That the Maker of all worlds, the Arbiter of all destinies, should lay aside his glory, and humiliate himself from love to man, will ever excite the wonder and adoration of the universe. As the nations of the saved look upon their Redeemer, and behold the eternal glory of the Father shining in his countenance; as they behold his throne, which is from everlasting to everlasting, and know that his kingdom is to have no end, they break forth in rapturous song, “Worthy, worthy is the Lamb that was slain, and hath redeemed us to God by his own most precious blood!” GC88 651.2
There, immortal minds will contemplate with never-failing delight the wonders of creative power, the mysteries of redeeming love. There will be no cruel, deceiving foe to tempt to forgetfulness of God. Every faculty will be developed, every capacity increased. The acquirement of knowledge will not weary the mind or exhaust the energies. There the grandest enterprises may be carried forward, the loftiest aspirations reached, the highest ambitions realized; and still there will arise new heights to surmount, new wonders to admire, new truths to comprehend, fresh objects to call forth the powers of mind and soul and body. GC 677.2
All the treasures of the universe will be open to the study of God’s redeemed. Unfettered by mortality, they wing their tireless flight to worlds afar-worlds that thrilled with sorrow at the spectacle of human woe and rang with songs of gladness at the tidings of a ransomed soul. With unutterable delight the children of earth enter into the joy and the wisdom of unfallen beings. They share the treasures of knowledge and understanding gained through ages upon ages in contemplation of God’s handiwork. With undimmed vision they gaze upon the glory of creation-suns and stars and systems, all in their appointed order circling the throne of Deity. Upon all things, from the least to the greatest, the Creator’s name is written, and in all are the riches of His power displayed. GC 677.3
And the years of eternity, as they roll, will bring richer and still more glorious revelations of God and of Christ. As knowledge is progressive, so will love, reverence, and happiness increase. The more men learn of God, the greater will be their admiration of His character. As Jesus opens before them the riches of redemption and the amazing achievements in the great controversy with Satan, the hearts of the ransomed thrill with more fervent devotion, and with more rapturous joy they sweep the harps of gold; and ten thousand times ten thousand and thousands of thousands of voices unite to swell the mighty chorus of praise. GC 678.1
“And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, heard I saying, Blessing, and honor, and glory, and power, be unto Him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever.” Revelation 5:13. GC 678.2
The great controversy is ended. Sin and sinners are no more. The entire universe is clean. One pulse of harmony and gladness beats through the vast creation. From Him who created all, flow life and light and gladness, throughout the realms of illimitable space. From the minutest atom to the greatest world, all things, animate and inanimate, in their unshadowed beauty and perfect joy, declare that God is love. GC 678.3
I highly recommend 'Conflict of the Ages' series of five books by Christian Author Ellen G. White
(Authentic Seer/Prophet of God).....
"The Great Controversy between Christ and Satan" Ellen G.White, 1888, rev.1911
" The Age of the Universe "
It sounds like a Pigs in Space episode
The past has everything to do with the course of the future. The past be truly known, humans would not be doing what they are currently doing to this planet.
The life cycle of birth, expression and death is necessary for any organism to evolve and survive into the future. The limit to life expectancy is completely dependent upon the rate of change for the physical constants and the implications for DNA replication. This evolution is known as TOP DOWN cosmology.
This is near certain: Imagine a universe beginning with a single "particle" of gigantic mass that spontaneously divides into two smaller masses (with a field that obviously must exist to unite them, like, say, primordial electrostatic gravity, a quantum relationship modulo 2). Imagine that over "time" the process of division continues, producing "newer," lighter "particles" (and forces that unite them "programmed" for future expression within when, per chance, they are irrationally unreconcilable by quantum counting) over "time." (Note: That cascade of particles is presently observed as "nuclear decay," where heavier elements spontaneously cascade into a spectrum of heavier-to-lighter elements.) To see how rapidly the NUMBER of observed particles (of increasingly smaller mass) can grow in a short amount of time, just multiply 2 x 2 = repeatedly on a small calculator-- in a very short time the numbers go off the scale! Just imagine, then, IN THE PROCESS OF DIVIDING, heavier masses, that eventually form galaxies, divide over time (seemingly coming from "nowhere") at each epoch of division (and extinction). This process is known as "TOP DOWN cosmology." In the end, you have present-day smaller galaxies, PLUS the cosmic heat signature of NOW-EXTINCT past elements (including galaxies), known today as the "cosmic microwave background radiation." (Note: Smaller early galaxies are required by BOTTOM UP big bang cosmology, where predicted smaller primal galaxies form larger galaxies over time, and where the predicted cosmic microwave background radiation would be "smooth;" HOWEVER, the OBSERVED cosmic background radiation is actually "lumpy," and OBSERVED primal galaxies are actually larger.) TOP DOWN cosmology wins! PS: I call this theory "The Origin Theory," as an extension of Darwin's "Origin of the Species." Please leave the ultimate origin and direction of our currently-complex universe (either with TOP DOWN or BOTTOM UP cosmology) to lesser-probabilities of 50/50, so as not to "throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Given that the latest "breakthrough" in fusion technology recklessly announces controlled fusion energy when it provides ignition WITHOUT accounting for energy out Vs TOTAL energy in (I still remember "cold fusion"), My TOP DOWN theory of cosmology says that in order to reconcile static gravitational and Coulomb effects (a valid grand unification theory goal) there is a value, a number R, such that Ke^2 = RGm^2, where K is the Coulomb constant, e^2 is the square of the charge on an electron, G is the universal gravitational constant and m^2 is the square of rest mass of an electron-- what can be simpler than that!. The calculated value of R is 4.16574 x 10^42. Given my TOP DOWN cosmology, then, Coulomb effects are 4.16574 x 10^42 times more intense than gravitational effects, meaning that local ignition, compression and containment needed for sustained fusion reactions are collectively unattainable. Clearly, the evolutionary direction of the universe must be countered and reversed to sustain a local fusion reaction-- a physical impossibility! Yet, much money and time is being WASTED on attempts to "find a way," apparently to justify continued reckless population growth on this fragile planet. (The problem does not exist with fission reactions, which have their own set of intractable problems, because energy release follows the direction of universal evolution.)
What is R? Numbers and predictive ability matter (rather than finding explanation after a discovery, presently being done with BOTTOM UP BBT): Per my TOP DOWN cosmology, the radius of the universe on a quantum level is R = Root (M/m), where M is the total mass of the universe needed to unite gravitational and electrostatic forces and m is the rest-mass of an electron, yielding, Ke^2/ R^2 = RGm^2/ R^2, where R^2 is the square of R. The calculated mass at a quantum level, including "missing mass," is M = 1.58079 x 10^55 power Kg, and the calculated radius of the quantum realm is R = 4.16574 x 10^42 power measured in instantaneous, dimensionless units. (M is undefined in the quantum realm, yet partially discernable as the observed mass Mo of the universe in the macroscopic world,). The number of unit circles (or squares) in the quantum realm is R^2 = 1.73534 x 10^85 power. It is a quantum attribute that area of unit squares and number of unit squares are indistinguishable (No need for citation, as all stated derivations are my own.) Everything is separating visually by such distance that the presence of extra-terrestrial life is very difficult to detect, yet everything has always been quantum-connected ("not locally real"). The total mass M needed to reconcile gravitational and electrostatic states is M = Mo /(2Pi - 1) (alpha^2), where Mo is the OBSERVABLE mass of the universe, (2Pi - 1) is the Bell inequality (ever an inequality in the macroscopic world, and equivalent to Euler's "proof of God" in the quantum realm, where M is UNDEFINED), and (alpha^2) is the square of the fine-structure constant (a optical magnification factor, twice applied for virtual and real expression). In the quantum realm, the equation is undefined, because the radius is equal to the circumference, meaning that Pi = 1/2. The number of unit circles (or squares) in the universe is M/m, where m is the present-day rest mass of the electron. For a unit circle to become a unit square, Buffon's needle problem becomes applicable, where one side is electrostatic and the other is gravitational. In order for the PROBABILITY to equal 1/2 (regarding Bell's inequality AND Buffon's problem), Pi = 4, meaning that Pi = 1/2 AND Pi = 4, implying that 1 = 8; hence, the qubit (used in quantum computing) is emergent. (My observations and derivations-- no citation needed.) Using my TOP DOWN cosmology, the rate of change of alpha is -2.7958 x 10^-17/ year, based upon a perceived age of the universe of 13.799 x 10^9 years. For very large R the definite integral of R over time T approaching origin of the universe to the present day is approximately 1/2 of R^2, verifying perceived dichotomy (a weird quantum nuance, where areas AND number of unit circles or squares are indistinguishable).
In the quantum realm, the term (2Pi - 1) = 0 can also be considered as the sidereal rotation of a unit circle within a unit circle (created by Buffon's needle drop probability).
As a physicist, I have been promoting this TOP DOWN model since1979. For those who would state (not me) that this is a "fun theory" (with its fulfilled prediction of larger primordial galaxies), demanding the math; then, when presented with the mathematical model finding the much-sought-after hidden "missing mass" and quantum gravity, implying that I am a mathematician with little relevance to physics: The physical world can instruct the mathematical world, IMO. In addition to reconciling the Coulomb constant and the universal gravitational constant, I have explained the significance of the little-understood fine structure constant, alpha. If you would simply "run with it," you have the information to calculate the age and rate of expansion of the universe (much older than the presently-accepted age of the universe, hidden by quantum effects).
Here are three obvious "predictions:"
-Per TOP DOWN cosmology, there is understandably a paucity of antimatter in the local universe.
-Hydrogen-rich stars and galaxies of equivalent mass, respectively, previously and inappropriately deemed to be colliding under BOTTOM UP (BBT) cosmology are actually and appropriately DIVIDING under TOP DOWN cosmology, which respects and predicts this behavior from evolutionary changes regarding critical mass (witness our own galaxy and Andromeda, representing main sequence evolution).
-The current abundance of elements is reconciled by main-sequence TOP DOWN evolution, not requiring multiple solar cycles, exceeding even the presently-accepted age of the universe per BOTTOM UP BBT.
There are no absolutes (a logical dilemma in itself). The closest thing to absolute certainty is found in abstract math-- in application there is always an uncertainty (like when counting apples). The best that can be expected in the physical world is to "bet on the odds." Given my TOP DOWN cosmology, odds are for things dividing rather than melding regarding cosmic events; whereas, there is every inclination for one schooled in BOTTOM UP BBT to look for, and prejudicially expect observed galaxies and stars to be colliding. Regarding dark energy: The hidden quantum world, which reveals itself as "locally not real" (Nobel Prize already given), contains a memory of the past in our own DNA, for example, revealed in morphogenesis ("ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny"), "betting on the odds." Dr. Rupert Sheldrake describes this as "morphic fields" and "morphic resonance." BTW, His theory accounts for why the Kelly astronaut twins are no longer DNA-identical twins, where there is no other better explanation that I have seen being offered-- instead, relegating any explanation to the growing category of "unexplained mysteries!"
JWST shatters misunderstandings, not understandings, don't get it twisted.
Not sure how a black hole looks like a galaxy🤔
there are no new laws of physics, only better human understanding.
I am the watcher over the milky way district.
Al will bow to me. All will kneel to him. all old aches and pains washed away. Warning it is intense Jesus power . Only reply if u want the proof
If these are what they are then the universe is older then 13b years.
So much for "SETTLED SCIENCE"--Science is NEVER settled.....
The age of the universe is 0, its only what you believe it is right now
Peter Parker interviewing a string theroist
Is not only universe more older but big bang it self is wrong.. i knew it when i see first image from JWST deep field..
You know nothing!
Or, everything we have told you as fact, is actually wrong?
Do most physicists agree that black holes are simply super dense spheres of mass not unlike neutron stars whose neutrons are touching neutrons with no apparent motion, black holes have another level of gravity and density that has the quarks and gluons pressed together with no remaining apparent motion or vibrations at all that have become dense enough that their event horizon diameter exceeds the sphere’s diameter, going black from our view?
I think Einstein's wrong, that time is constant and that dark matter is the limiting factor to the speed of light. I think it’s not 'space-time' bending but rather gravitational and dark matter density variations.
How can you be so sure of your hypothesis knowing that till this day it is unknown what dark matter is