302.S9B: The Galois Correspondence

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 дек 2024

Комментарии •

  • @danbaeckstrom2189
    @danbaeckstrom2189 2 года назад +1

    5:15 the magenta-coloured card with the subfields has Q(alpha) and Q(zeta) mixed up, I think.

  • @192ali1
    @192ali1 7 лет назад +2

    Thank you Dr. Salomone for your positive and humble contribution . Your videos are unique and excellent. I would like to know whether you may also have videos for the abstract algebra I. Thank you

  • @Mrpallekuling
    @Mrpallekuling Год назад

    Very nice, Dr Salomone. One question:
    Should 2^(2/3)[1+ζ] be 2^(1/3)[1+ζ^2]?
    I'm asking because the roots of t^3-2 are:
    2^(1/3)
    2^(1/3)ζ
    2^(1/3)ζ^2
    and since
    {t} => 2^(1/3) fixed, and
    {tr} => 2^(1/3) and 2^(1/3)ζ both fixed, then it seems logical that
    {tr^2} => 2^(1/3) and 2^(1/3)ζ^2 both fixed

  • @PunmasterSTP
    @PunmasterSTP 4 месяца назад

    When Matt looks at the camera and tells you something is important, you better buckle up!

  • @ΕλένηΤραχανά
    @ΕλένηΤραχανά 5 лет назад

    Excellent video.Thank you Dr. Salomone.

  • @kalyankumar8902
    @kalyankumar8902 10 лет назад +1

    Dear Matt Sir, Thanks for the excellent video! Around 8.37, you have mentioned that Z3 fixes zeta3 and zeta3 square. I'm not able to understand that concept. Could you please share your thoughts when you find time. Thanks !

    • @danbaeckstrom2189
      @danbaeckstrom2189 2 года назад

      On the other hand, at 14:20, he says that Q(zeta) fixes only Q - which makes much more sense, I think.

  • @rasraster
    @rasraster Год назад

    Do you record these videos at normal speed and then speed them up so that they'll be shorter? 😅 Who can process new material at 78 rpm?

  • @abhilashtripathy9176
    @abhilashtripathy9176 7 лет назад +1

    sir any videos on solving polynomial by Galois theory

  • @derciferreira7211
    @derciferreira7211 8 лет назад +1

    can z3 be a subgroup of S3?

    • @MatthewSalomone
      @MatthewSalomone  8 лет назад +4

      derci ferreira Yep! It's worth thinking, though, about whether Z3 is a *normal* subgroup of S3 and why/why not.

    • @derciferreira7211
      @derciferreira7211 8 лет назад

      Matthew Salomone if every group of n order is a subgroup of a simetric group of n order, then Z3 is a subgroup of S3.

    • @bonbonpony
      @bonbonpony 6 лет назад +1

      `Z₃` is a cyclic group, and cyclic groups are the "building blocks" that other groups are made of, so they are always subgroups of other groups ;) (including the symmetric group `S₃`).

    • @rockinroggenrola7277
      @rockinroggenrola7277 3 года назад

      @@bonbonpony Well, not all groups have cyclic groups as normal subgroups. Take for example the alternating groups.

    • @bonbonpony
      @bonbonpony 3 года назад

      @@rockinroggenrola7277 I didn't say "NORMAL subgroups", I just said "subgroups". And I can't think of any group that wouldn't have cyclic groups as (not-necessarily-normal) subgroups, considering that you can always take some generator and calculate its powers until it wraps around, obtaining a cyclic group this way. I think that there even was some theorem about that, if I remember correctly.

  • @galois.2027
    @galois.2027 3 года назад +1

    This video is great, but I just can't keep up with its pace. I just started Galois theory

    • @rasraster
      @rasraster Год назад

      I agree! No one can process new material this fast.

  • @guiwenluo1774
    @guiwenluo1774 4 года назад

    Great video, thanks.

  • @viveknsharma
    @viveknsharma 6 лет назад

    Respected Matthew Sir, I have a general query: Do You have notes on complex analysis as well? Please reply, it's a request...

    • @MatthewSalomone
      @MatthewSalomone  6 лет назад

      I wish I did have complex analysis materials because I love that subject very much. But I don't at this time.

  • @hyperduality2838
    @hyperduality2838 Год назад

    Subfields are dual to subgroups.
    Rotations are dual to reflections.
    Conjugate pairs = duality!
    "Always two there are" -- Yoda.

  • @naveedsayed8365
    @naveedsayed8365 10 лет назад

    You explained this way too fast without showing us how things work. I've watched the video several times, and I still understand nothing.

    • @redaabakhti768
      @redaabakhti768 8 лет назад +1

      +Naveed Sayed watch the prevIous vIdeos you wIll understand

    • @SuperYtc1
      @SuperYtc1 8 лет назад +3

      He is rather fast paced but I would recommend utilizing the pause button to give yourself time to think on certain areas.
      Also I recommend watching videos by other people too.
      Galois Theory is like a language, and it can be hard to explain and get across, so learning it from multiple sources is a great way of getting your head around it.

    • @HotPepperLala
      @HotPepperLala 5 лет назад +1

      I actually put this up at 2x speed. Just Slow it down if u want

    • @rasraster
      @rasraster Год назад +2

      ​@@SuperYtc1- I listen at 0.75