Basically if your stadium isn't indoors, isn't located in California or in the south you're never getting a Super Bowl, except that one time in New Jersey.
Absolute facts. But also besides the fact that hosting a sporting event at MetLife Stadium is almost similar to a family visiting their grandmothers house, The traffic going from there into New York City is an absolute nightmare
Love how this video was made BEFORE the sewage pipe explosion in the box seats AND the non-load-bearing safety rail collapse, and FedEx Field was still at the top of the "No way in hell" heap.
Me having been to a Super Bowl… When given the opportunity to drop $100 for a ticket to see my beloved Raiders in the Super Bowl a mere 2 hour drive away on my birthday about 8 hours before kickoff… I gave a hard no. I told my buddy he should go. But it is a weird vibe. The crowd is not partisan and mainly people who are there to say they were at the Super Bowl. After the game he agreed. He was surrounded by people who were there for an event and not a game. He will never go to another Super Bowl, either.
Honestly I'm looking forward to win Allegiant stadium hosts a Super Bowl cuz a Super Bowl in Las Vegas is pretty much a no brainer plus that stadium looks beautiful
You're forgetting that, while the Met Life game had surprisingly decent weather DURING the game, a MASSIVE storm hit right after the game. That pretty much ended any outdoor stadium in cold weather cities from ever getting another Super Bowl. I'm shocked that Allegiant hasn't gotten a Super Bowl scheduled yet. I would have thought they would be on the list right after Sofi.
Sofi was in the pipes last time they assigned a bulk of games. Allegiant had just missed it. 2024 is open because they didn’t want to split the city with Marci gras. I fully expect the league to announce SB 58 is being hosted by Vegas sometime this year
@@george-cann in game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals and the Igloo roof actually opened, but a helicopter crashed into the ice! Also, it made Iceburgh look evil! 🤣
Lambeau's the least surprising hard no you could have. I remember the question being asked regionally back in the mid-90s, and at that time, someone gave a great stat that answered the question forever for me: the Super Bowl at the time had about 2200 credentialed members of the media go to the week, and there were less than 1200 hotel rooms within an hour of Lambeau.
The Green Bay Press Gazette did an article about the requirements for hosting a Super Bowl, and even taking into account lodging further away than an hour in Door County, they STILL wouldn't have enough.
@@JeremiahDouglas That's true. If you have a home or business within walking distance of Lambeau, you can typically charge between $10 and $30 for cars to park on your property.
In my opinion playing in lambeau is the most difficult task out the season during winter. Maybe beginning of season you can get away with it. Once January and playoffs hit its crazy. Even when the 49ers beat the packers last year damn near half their team got injured cas of playing there in that weather
I’m not sure why you think that Houston will not host again. It has the Stadium, two Airports, ranked in the top ten of Hotel rooms and average temperature for February is 64 degrees. Not to mention the nightlife.
I get why Philly would never host a Superbowl... But saying cause of tourists reasons is a lazy take , you got so many historical places in Philly it's not even funny 😂
@@gramps5157 last time Philly won a Super Bowl an Eagles fan literally ate horse shit on the street in celebration. I didn't believe it either when I heard comedian Bill Burr mention it but you can easily look up the footage if you dare.
The tourism crack was way off base. Philly has a lot of tourism now. It's got the biggest downtown outside of Chicago and NYC. There is plenty to do and see. I won't defend Eagles fans, though.
Nah. No to cold weather superbowls. The ultimate game should be played in neutral weather to determine the best team. Don't want a team winning because they got an assist from mother nature.
There is a ton of tourist attractions in Philly, take that back. Betsy Ross house, Liberty Bell, Love park, City Hall, Art Museum, and Cheesesteak spots
I would love a Super Bowl in the north. The game was designed to be an all-weather game. Not a track contest. Southern college teams wouldn't have nearly the success they have had in the playoff game if the games were in harsher elements. With that said, I was bumped to see how the weather affected the Bucs-Pats this year, which to me was the most anticipated game (which doesn't include my favorite team.) I wouldn't like a team to be at a disadvantage due to the weather.
@@Luuth I remember the game in Minneapolis. It was so cold. The game was inside, but so many people stilled complained about the weather. The weather can change a lot. I think Michigan defeated Ohio State in large part due to the weather. Michigan was tougher too which played a big role. I get your point. And your reasoning is why the games will always be in good conditions. You are right. I just said what I said because personally I would like big games to be played in the North as well. A team like Notre Dame focuses so much on tight ends. They may have faired better versus Alabama last year had the conditions been bad. All the NFL teams have to be balanced. But at college there certainly are some teams built for different conditions.
@@arnolddonaldson7129 The Game this year wasn't hugely impacted by the weather, I've been at Michigan games so much more impacted by both rain and snow than this year's was.
@@elh93 Of course it was impacted. The weather could have been much worse - but it was far from a fast track. The worse the weather becomes the more advantage goes to running teams. And Michigan had the better O-line and D-line. If the game was at Jerry's World, or a fast track, I think it would favor the Buckeyes. I am not taking anything away from Michigan. It's Ryan Day's fault the Buckeyes are built like they are. They are built like a southern team playing in bad weather. Michigan wanted the game more and they were tougher. I am not sure why so many Michigan fans are gloating though. That's Michigan's 3rd win since Tressel was hired. Gattis should have kept his mouth shut instead of calling Ohio State soft. That was a big mistake. I wouldn't be surprised if Day put that quote all around the football facilities.
As much as I would love to see Pittsburgh host and I know the Rooneys were pushing for it, that will always be a hard no. Hotel space and weather will always make this one impossible. Maybe if the Steelers ever get a dome but the City couldn’t afford a facility like that and the shear idea of ever having one goes completely against the identity of the team.
I know it will NEVER happen but could you imagine a blizzard Super Bowl in Green Bay. The historical significance of the location is just insane. It would be magical and a bid to the past of football. Am I bias? Massively.
@@kurtpunchesthings2411 no its not always like that in wisconsin. that was actually extreme weather for even wisconsin. so it wouldnt be quite that bad.
RE: Seattle - it rains 150 days per year on average in Seattle but the actual amount of rain is 37 inches/year on average. Much of the eastern seaboard gets more rain, for example NYC averaging 47 inches per year. It’s generally a light rain and I wouldn’t be surprised if they got one sometime soon
Seattle isnt even in the top 10 of rainiest cities. I think its because we have a lot of cloudy or partly cloudy days, so we just have that reputation. Its too bad, Seattle would be a great Super Bowl experience.
@@Meme-zc4cw I’d say hell yeah because I love my city getting shine, I say hell no because I live in West Seattle and they need to fix this fucking bridge already.
@@JohnDoe-xo3lr Maybe if we got a Super Bowl it would light a fire under their ass to fix it. Its gone long enough. I live in the North End, so thankfully I dont have to deal with it.
It will be a nightmare If Philadelphia Host a Super Bowl 1: Traffic 2: Snow Storm 3: Airport Issues 4: Almost All Training Areas For Philadelphia Sports Are In Delaware or in New Jersey, and no one want to waste 10 dollars to train with gas 5: Lowest Placing Super Bowl Ever 6: NO ONE WANTS TO PAY 35 DOLLARS FOR A COAT IN PHILADELPHIA!!!! 7: Barley Any Outdoor Stadium Has Hosted A Super Bowl 8: They Are Trending For New Venues And Lincoln Financial Field, Wells Fargo Center, Subaru Arena, and Citizens Bank Park Won’t Make the cut 8: And To Top It all Off, Philadelphia Has The Insane Idea Of Bidding to Host The Super Bowl, NBA All Star Game, MLB World Series, The Stanley Cup for 2026! (Be laughing my butt off if the can’t host anything that year)
I still don’t think we would get a super bowl in Charlotte but we are probably going to have an even better chance after the renovations for our soccer team are done
@@wllms02 to be fair if there was a shot of hosting a Superbowl they would make all necessary renovations so that they could, hosting a Superbowl brings in millions of dollars for that city lmao
With stadiums changing naming rights left and right, it would actually be easier to recognize the stadiums if you just called them "Browns Stadium", Seahawks Stadium". With the exception of a few, I can't keep up anymore.
@@TestTest-ei4gi true that.. just a shame how capitalism has corrupted good business practices.. if it were up to me, I would do like team names or city names for stadiums... But then in the early Super Bowls, they had marching bands from local colleges/high schools versus the highly paid celebrity singers of today's Super Bowls.. mind-boggling and fascinating how it's changed over the years..
I disagree with your review of Philadelphia. Superbowl 52 was held in Minneapolis during a snowstorm. Disappointing except for the game outcome. Philadelphia has been on the short-list to host the 2016 & 2024 Olympic Games & World Cup Soccer; it could assuredly host the Superbowl venue. Multi-complex of stadiums and arenas, 5 mins from PHL airport, I-95 highway/Amtrak rail access, more than a dozen casinos in the vicinity, the Mummers, ample restaurants, historic monuments/museums, beer gardens, strip clubs, drugs and hookers. Philly, not NYC has been the host of 2 of the largest rock concerts on the globe. Live Aid (1985) & Live 8 Concert (2005) both had over 1.5 million per in attendance. Thank you. "Here lies W.C Fields. I would rather be living in Philadelphia."
Recall that US Bank Stadium is an enclosed stadium. Lincoln Financial Field is not, and Philadelphia is quite cold in February. You mentioned Live Aid, the Olympics and the World Cup. All of these events take (took) place during the summer.
@@themanhimself427 agree with you on most of the points, but I can understand the weather issue here in Philly. Some of the earlier SB's were played in cold weather OUTSIDE. As it became more popular worldwide, of course the league wanted to provide a greater fan experience, which meant having the big game held in either a city with warmer climate and/or a dome.
Both Superbowl teams would wear down by the 2nd quarter. Unless they both arrive two weeks before the game. That way, they'll both be acclimated to the climate.
Denver would not happen for precisely that reason. One of the players could have sickle cell and be unable to play there at all (which has already happened). Denver should absolutely be in the hell no category
@@wanderingvetcj sorry - have to disagree…the “altitude” thing is wayyy overstated…what’s the percentage of players actually having medical issues ?? Ryan Clark was the only one…there hasn’t been a Bronco player affected in a long time if ever, because if there were, it would be news for weeks..
Given that the Panthers owner is looking to build a new retractable roof stadium sometime in the near future, Charlotte’s chances of hosting a Super Bowl will go up substantially.
In 2012 I took two of my Children to Super bowl village the week leading up to Super bowl XLVI(46)In Indianapolis,we had a great time and INDY an Awesome Job of hosting. We also did the Indianapolis Childrens Museum,I live in the Ft. Wayne Market,so getting there wasn't that hard,I believe INDY could host another Super bowl by the 2030's
@@alaeriia01 Smart man. Denver once got the Olympics too, but they awarded it BEFORE the vote on actually paying for it. Said vote lost in a landslide and they ended up moving the Olympics to somewhere in Europe. Austria, I think.
9:32 Being downtown would actually help Soldier Field. For people coming from out of town, there is decent transit to get to the stadium from your hotel.
Update! A new 2 billion dollar state of the art stadium will be getting built in Nashville for the Titans so we can host the Super Bowl with retractable roof.
I am curious to see how a Super Bowl in Las Vegas goes. Probably going to be better than Miami, minus the beach. I could definitely see it being the biggest grossing Super Bowl in terms of money/economic impact. I would love to see a Super Bowl played in Charlotte, and with the Panthers practice facility/HQ being built down the road in Rock Hill, I could see the boxes being checkmarked. Only thing would be hotel space, but I think it's almost there. Tired of seeing Super Bowls given to New Orleans. Same could be said for Miami, but I understand the pull there.
@@krowman8458 supposedly due to hotel space. The only Super Bowl they hosted, they had to bring in a cruise ship to hold more people. I still think another should be held there, especially if Shad Khan builds a new facility. Miami and NO Super Bowls are just overdone. Let’s see some different places host it.
I love how we are all unanimous in the fact that FedEx Field is the worst NFL Stadium by a country mile. Literally no redeeming qualities about it at all.
not hardly, well designed and actually a much better venue than some I have been to. Really stupid and misinformed comment, have you actually been to a game there?
FedEx field probably has one of the nicest stadium layouts tho with how the parking is and how the stadium is right in the middle of the parking. I think it looks pretty cool from birds eye view
I feel like Houston will get more Super Bowls and Lucas Oil might, if Indy cleans up the area. As a Tampa resident, I wonder if when the Bucs' lease is up in 2028, RayJay will get a Miami-like renovation with a canopy, or a new retractable roof facility will be built. Games are brutally hot there until about mid October.
That’s something I’ve never understood. We sat on hot uncomfortable bleachers in the Sombrero, and they build a new stadium with no cover from the elements. We do have a pirate ship that fires cannons though……
@@jacklandaupresents It's the same reason the Rays will need another indoor stadium (if they stay in the market), Aug and Sept are miserable here. If the Bucs can stay competitive after Brady retires, I think we have a case for a retractable roof stadium.
@@yaboilettuce7394 That's like saying "Why should Tampa get a SB when Miami is right there?" Houston has been exploding in size for decades now. For every 3 SBs that Dallas hosts, I see Houston getting 1. Indy has built itself to be a convention city. They have the hotels and infrastructure, but the cold and areas near the stadium work against it. I don't see why Minneapolis would get another SB before Indy.
@@91_C4_FL I worked the Superbowl in Tampa and was talking to some people who have worked more than me and every single person who worked in Minneapolis said it was miserable, and a bunch more said they skipped it cause of that
To teams who make a Super Bowl: You're supposedly one of the best teams in football yes? *It rains. It snows. The wind, it blows. It gets hot and cold. Deal with it.*
Id love to see a Super Bowl in Arrowhead, but we all know it's not happening. I'm surprised it got into the "maybe" category to be honest. Like you said, the chances of a massive winter storm are just too high.
Exactly..also I'm noticing that the draft has become a big and fun way to get familiar with the NFL for newcomers or casual fans and to razz different teams and rep your teams.. btw Go Raiders! 😎👍
@@jamesreynolds5776 True. I went to the draft when it came here to Cleveland this year, it was a lot of fun. Definitely want to go to the one in Vegas next year.
No matter how badly the NFL wants to deny it, football is a cold weather sport. It's boring watching games played in oversized hotel lobbies at room temperature, I want to see snow. Imagine the Super Bowl at Orchard Park, no matter who's playing, in 6 inches of snow and 20°. That's when you start to see the truly talented players shine, and a little chaos can be good. It would be amazing.
Like how all the skilled position players played in the monsoon in SF? Truly talented players are neutered in bad weather. It becomes a game of who can block the best and turn the ball over the least. We've seen that NFL before and it didn't sell.
@@stevejones148 Actually, the skilled players are able to rise above the conditions. Jerry Kramer and the Green Bay offensive line in the Ice Bowl is an excellent example, one of the best championship games in the history of football. It's boring to play indoors.
@@shipofthesun So your one example expands on my point? Strange way to prove your point about skilled position players in today's game playing great in bad weather by going back to Vince Lombardi and Jerry Kramer and the O-line.
Considering it’s a 13 year hiatus at the absolute minimum, don’t hold your breath. I’d expect to see the 9ers or Dallas host one before them who are also staring down 10+ year hiatuses. The pattern of Miami, Tampa, New Orleans, and Arizona hosting the vast majority will continue, just throw SoFi into the rotation now. It’s not a coincidence either that all these cities host the major college bowl games in January either. It took 16 Super Bowls before the NFL left these cities when they started out and they’ve continued on with it for good reason. They’re good places to host the events.
I think NRG might get one more crack at a Super Bowl. After all, if the Super Dome and Raymond James host regularly (both of which are older than NRG, and Raymond James additionally is under 70,000 and in an objectively worse/smaller city), then nothing's stopping NRG.
As a Denver resident and native, imma challenge on Mile High Stadium. Denver has the infrastructure, major airport, plenty of hotels as well as practice fields for each team. The weather during super bowl 54 was actually warmer in Denver than in Miami. The altitude is the only detractor but we have pot for that.
Plus, you’d figure for some of the high rollers that’d come to a Denver based Super Bowl, they’d have the ski resorts and what not to host parties and what not at before the game.
Absolutely. I mean February's are usually pretty mild in Denver BUT.... the chance that it could snow is just enough to keep them away. In fact, there's been some nasty cold fronts and snowstorms in February these recent years.
A couple of decades ago, Philly bid on a SB at the Vet, and were actually one of the finalists with a lot of consideration given. They addressed the routy fans issue by installing a legal Courtroom and several jail cells right in the basement of the stadium (true story). The Court and cells got a lot of use during Mets vs. Phillies baseball games.
I took a tour of Lincoln Financial and I literally asked the guy who was the tour guy can I see the courtroom can I see the jails that built into Lincoln Financial and a guy said I can't take you to the courtroom I can't take you to the jail cell well here's the largest bar built into into a stadium ever and I'm a Bills fan and Giants fan
And in terms of the reputation of Philly sports fans, that courtroom was the worst thing that could have happened. Everyone loves to take cheap shots at Philly fans, as if the Linc and the Vet were the only stadiums ever to have snowball incidents, and that courtroom is constantly brought up as an example of how supposedly out of hand Philly fans are.
the fact that Denver gets 300 days of sunshine a year and that we normally have a dry climate and less and less snow every year should make us a contender for a superbowl. 1 we have the hotels. 2. we have the space. 3. we have indoor practice spaces. 4 the weather isnt that bad actually better then the Meadow lands and they made that happen. 4. This is a hardcore NFL city in the heart of the city. 5. just stop being a hater yes it might be cold and yes there is a potential for snow but why not!
@@AlanHernandez-jn2mp doesn't frequently get very windy around here. Altitude isn't that big of a deal and snow unless its a blizzard which rarely happens doesn't last long
@@Mari0slayar The Broncos literally named their stadium after their altitude.. It's a BIG deal when it comes to high performance.. Athletes & Vehicles who struggle to get air at high altitudes. Undebatable, Sorry.
As a Bengals fan I thank you for being so nice and concise, I feel like you could’ve spent the whole video on just reasons why Cincinnati will never host a super bowl
They probably gonna eye Philly for super bowl 2026 because that year is Americas 250th birthday and Philly is already set to host the MLB world series that year
@@Damianoutlaw does that include suburbs though? When you factor in Murfreesboro, Smyrna, Mt Juliet, and gallitin you wouldn’t think lodging would be an issue. I do hope we eventually put a dome on Nissan stadium though.
I understand from a broadcast/casual fan perspective why they want nice weather for the super bowl, but removing all stadiums that have a chance of snow/rain/general cold takes away from so much of what makes football, football and is a big mistake by the NFL imo.
You'd think it's a mistake until you end up with a Super Bowl like the Patriots/Bills Monday night football game in Buffalo. Where the Pats threw the ball a grand total of 3 times during the entire game due to weather. From a sentimentality standpoint, I agree with you but from a practical/entertainment stand point, you wouldn't want a potential match btwn a Tom Brady/Aaron Rodgers to be crippled by atrocious weather. The NFL has become a QB driven league and you want your marquee event to display its best talent
The Conference Championships , at least, are played on the pertinent fields regardless of weather! Historically, NFL Conference Championship games have often been more exciting, better games than the Super Bowl game that follows them.
It's more about the top-spending fans in attendance than it is about the quality of the games. You can't put on a major event with VIPs and a half time show in cold weather or winter precipitation.
@@carltonharvey You're using Rodgers as your example against holding the Superbowl in a poor climate!!!! Have you seen the weather in Greenbay??? Freezing cold conditions and Rodgers still puts on legendary performances every week.
@@carltonharvey Tom Brady and Aaron Rodgers have both played in bad weather for years. Unless it was a blizzard and below zero. Their performances would not be affected by that much. Besides that bad weather has made for some memorable football games like the famous Ice Bowl in Green Bay in 1967 between the Cowboys and the Packers. One of the main things that makes football great for me is that the games are played in any weather except for lightning and hurricanes. The Super Bowl is a little different in that there are a lot more events going on that week besides just the game. And the Super Bowl is usually held in cities that are big in the tourist industry. Having saying that I would love to see the Super Bowl played in a snowstorm.
Everybody here that wants to see the game played in cold weather needs to remember that the NFL and most people who aren't really football fans see the game as an afterthought. The League is far more invested in the pregame stuff and the halftime show than they are invested in the game no matter what the official position on this subject is. They are never going to accept a stadium where chances are high that some major music star has to try and put on a show in the middle of a rain or snow storm. And honestly lets be real here. The number of interesting competitive Super Bowls is a pretty small percentage of the total number of times it's been played. With so many boring blow outs in the big game the NFL practically has to sell it as an event that is far more than just a championship game just to keep most people interested.
Tampa may have been the first team to win in their home stadium, but they weren't the first to win in their home market. That honor goes to the 49ers who won at Stanford University in SB XIX
Did he say why he put NRG in houston on the hosted but probably never will again column? The stadium is still fairly new, houston definitely has the hotel space, there are indoor venues right next door like george r brown where they could have gameday experience indoors, and there is a convertible roof on the stadium so weather wouldnt be a factor. From what ive read Houston is towards the top of the list even skipping some teams, and all that would be asked is a little upkeep of NRG. The stadium wouldnt even need much. I'd think it would be nearly a certain thing they will host the SB again soon
Another thing working against Baltimore for the Super Bowl - Beginning of February is almost always marred by snowstorms/ice storms. Stopped counting how many birthdays (2/8) were spent watching falling ice and/or snow from the living room window.
the biggest thing working against Baltimore is the fact that tourists and fans to the game wont want to walk down the sidewalk and get mugged or just outright shot because your city government is about the same as DC, soft on crime
Whenever it is mentioned that Tampa Bay winning the Super Bowl in 2021 was the first time a team had won in it’s home stadium that is true. But, in Super Bowl 1985, the San Francisco 49ers defeated the Miami dolphins At Stanford Stadium in Palo Alto, California. True, the 49ers home stadium at the time was candlestick Park in San Francisco. But Stanford Stadium was only about 30 miles from candlestick Park. Further, the San Francisco 49ers were technically the host team for the 1985 Super Bowl.
@@brianfitzsimmons6074 Whole lot of words to prove you dont understand what 'Neutral Site' means! If you played at a high school field, but in your home market, it isnt a Neutral Site'!! 30 minutes from Candle stick is convenient for 49ers fans, unless they all walk everywhere! Geez, man!
KC fan here. A couple of notes on the maybe of Arrowhead: being that we are used to cold winters we have quite a bit of big, indoor spaces for practices. Also as for the field, I know they put in heaters and amazing drainage under the field a few years ago. If it happened, it would be awesome to see a Super Bowl while it was snowing, while not having to deal with inches of snow on the ground.
the bigger concern with KC is that the town gets hammered by a storm ruining all of the festivities leading up to the Super Bowl. As a football fan, I care less about that - but the league does not. The league doesn't want to gamble on a place unless there is a big payoff. While weather isn't the reason it's not going to be there, no one is bending over backwards unless you're going to provide some upside like "New York" (cough Jersey cough). KC is a lot higher on the list though (of potential suitors that have never gotten one) than many of the others.
There's a bias against KC for something they cannot control. If they can hold it at Mile High Stadium where it snows 6 months out of a year plus the high altitude, there's honestly no other major excuse to be listed here. The rest can be worked around. They got KU's football stadium in Lawrence to practice at with no issues there. Plus KC's infrastructure is improving, just give it a chance, huh?
Another knock the area around the Truman Sports complex is the area has went downhill big time. Used to live 10 minutes from the Stadiums. In the 70s walked to many games mainly Royals games. I drive by the old neighborhood once in a while sad to see all the trash along Raytown road and Ozark & Skiles road. They have the World cup coming soon hoping K.C Will clean up the area before then.
One thing going for Arrowhead is now that it's confirmed that it will host the world cup, Kansas City is planning on doing a lot to improve the infrastructure around the stadium including transport and hotel accommodations. The KC airport is also nearly done with a massive renovation that adds a larger, more modern terminal. The main issue for KC will be the weather at that point.
I would love to see a Super Bowl be contested in a cold weather environment. As a Canadian some of my fondest memories of Grey Cup's are the games that are contested in winter conditions want to see what I mean look up the highlights from the 1996 Grey Cup
The dream would be to see Alaska get a Super Bowl now that would be interesting. If only Alaska had a massive stadium to do so. A Super Bowl in Alaska would make for an interesting game wether wise. I would not mind seeing a Super Bowl in Toronto.
Sorry to rain on your parade but that will never happen. No one wants to pay that kinda money to go to the super bowl to sit in a -5 degree ice box. Also weather should not be a factor in the most important game of the year.
@@nateboertman1494 But by playing only playing it in warm climate weather does become a factor as it favors the teams that are used to those conditions. Greenbay for example would be at a huge disadvantage if they had to play in California when the players aren't acclimated to warm weather. Take it from a Scotsman if you are only used to the cold then the heat becomes an issue.
@@24magiccarrot Honestly, it would be interesting if you had two warm-weather teams going into the Super Bowl, then you throw the "neutral ground" up in Green Bay or Minneapolis where both teams, both not accustomed to the cold, have to deal with freezing conditions as an ultimate test of skill. This is the Super Bowl after all and that would be a nice X-factor to throw in, especially considering the weather was part of the reason the Ice Bowl is known as such a great game. Alternatively, if you do end up with a Super Bowl between two cold-weather teams, why not just say cold weather stadium is fair neutral ground for that season and throw some cold stadiums into the mix?
@@harleymitchelly5542 Problem is supebowl tickets are sold well in advance of knowing which teams are going to be in the superbowl as such the stadium needs to be selected well in advance of knowing what the teams are.
The lack of a Super Bowl at First Energy Stadium is particularly devastating because it has never hosted a Browns playoff game either since opening in 1999. I feel every stadium, no matter what, should be allowed to host the Super Bowl. The NJ game I feel opened the door for more cold-weather Super Bowls.
There are hotels, lots of parking, and the stadium is easily accessible. The weather being right off Lake Erie in Feb can be awful. Super cold or a big snowstorm or both. Even a mild weather day is low to mid 30s or 40s. Off the lake it feels a lot colder. The only way a super bowl possible hosted there is to put a dome on it but still doubtful.
What Five either missed or neglected to mention is that Seattle's parking situation is equally abysmal. The stadium is mere walking distance from Pioneer Square, it's right next to a highway off-ramp, which isn't I-5, mind you; I-5 is three blocks away on the other side. Seattle has enough problems housing their own residents, how in the hell would they fit another 100K people in maybe the most cramped corridor in the entire region?
Seattle's stadium is built to amplify crowd noise to the point it interferes with conduct of the game and can damage the hearing of people in the crowd (over 115 dB is unhealthy, Seattle reaches over 145). It is no place to hold a championship game.
Honestly, Nashville’s booming infrastructure and the area’s love for all sports could make it a quite possible host for a Super Bowl within the next 10-25 years. Plus, this video doesn’t include possible stadium upgrades, including temporary grandstands for increased capacity. Nissan Stadium’s 69,000 capacity seating is already close to the requirements. Maybe some added grandstands to the endzones may help the city in getting a Super Bowl bid.
If Nashville gets to be a 2026 World Cup Host City. This will move up the timeline big time. BTW: Five Points Vids should do a tier list ranking the 2026 World Cup Candidate Cities to see which cities will be selected as World Cup Host Cities. The final announcement will be announced probably by the end of 2021 (Probably November or December.
I remember the super bowl in Jacksonville and I was living here and still am and it was so fun. It felt like a whole entertainment hotspot. Hopefully they’ll host it again but we need some entertainment, more hotel rooms, and better transportation to do so.
If they get some more hotels built, they could be in business to host the game again. I recall that they had to bring in some cruise ships to get everyone sheltered.
One of the main reasons why Indy's Super Bowl was successful was the weather was USUALLY warm that week. Very very rare to see 60 degrees in February on one day but the entire week is phenomenal in itself. Indy got so lucky with that. Plus they introduced the zip line and the was probably the biggest hit besides the game itself.
Indiana weather is absolutely unpredictable. The only good thing is it is rarely extreme. A few years ago one of my uncles died in January and I'll never forget the graveside service being like 80 degrees. Probably snowed the next day, but don't recall for sure.
@@jeremywj damn I don't ever remember hitting 80 degrees in January here. That would be probably one of the rarest feats ever here. I remember a few years back (I think 2017, maybe) it was in the 70's in February. That year was extremely warm even throughout the summer it was hot and miserable.
You burned FedEx pretty good - I believe the NFL would play the Super Bowl in Hawaii, St. Louis or Orlando before they awarded it to that dive bar of a stadium.
I think the biggest reason they went to a criteria format to decide who gets the supper bowl is because they want the owners and the home cities to up grade their stadiums.
I love Lucas Oil. I was just in Indy and the infrastructure is still there. All the new hotels built are still there and the new convention center is huge.
Honestly I think a super bowl in Baltimore would be good since depending on the team you could probably get that thing into full capacity and not to mention it’s like a hour from DC
It still wouldn't happen, but the winter weather in Denver is getting more mild by the year. Plenty of infrastructure and practice space to go along with a nice stadium
i do agree with u about the infrastructure, practice space and nice stadium, denver would be good for a super bowl especially with I-25 and Us-6 and 40 right next to the stadium providing easy access (well hopefully, bc traffic gets worse every year), however February is the most bitter part of winter in Denver. Feb-Mar Have have the coldest Temps and the most snow. Colorado's weather is so unpredictable that it could be 60° and sunny or -10° with a huge blizzard. We've had a few yr span with late snow and mild Temps, until 2019, its been brutal from December to early April here in the winter with some of the worst storms we've ever had and some record breaking lows. What makes it even crazier is within the last few years after a huge blizzard with single digit temps its always like extremely warm with mid spring weather right after
if i owned an nfl franchise, our stadium would have to become a retractable dome at minimum, just so we can have a shot at hosting the big game…and college bowl games and stuff
I think Seattle or anywhere in the Northeast could get it. The stadium is close enough to Downtown to be a success even if it’s overcast. Also NY held it 2013 and many in NY saw it as a success so that makes any Northeast team on the coast a viable contender
Like has been said, they got lucky with that Super Bowl. The weather will always be a factor but even more so is the transportation. Leaving MetLife for a regular season Jets/Giants game is a pain in the ass.
I live 30 minutes from Greenbay… it would realistically be a nightmare. Green Bay is the smallest city to host an NFL team, no major airports near, minimal parking in the stadium, freezing weather (not a negative to me but to some fans they would hate it), i dint even think there is half the hotel space needed. Would be cool asf but realistically it’s impossible.
@@aheinrich2535 Ignore the super picky VIPs and actors. Host it for the fans. True lovers of the game. They will be able to handle the drive to Milwaukee.
Same. If I remember correctly, we did a fantastic job hosting that superbowl. So I don't see why we couldn't host another, unless dude is just biased to Indianapolis.
8:00 “nobody visits Philly for tourist reasons” Literally going there in October for tourist reasons (and week 6 v Tampa) as it’s my first time visiting America and first real vacation in a decade.
Just remember, not all cities are like Philly. But when youre there you should definitely visit Kensington. It's the nicest part of the city and you will definitely be in absolute awe.
Lmaooo of ALL the places you chose philly? Honestly since youll be on the EC I HIGHLY recommend going to DC. It is BEAUTIFUL and extremely clean. You couldnt have chosen a worst city on the east coast to visit lmao
I would recommend taking a bus or train to Boston and explore the history.. Statehouse is very cool and lots of cool things like Sam Adams Brewery etc..
Basically if your stadium isn't indoors, isn't located in California or in the south you're never getting a Super Bowl, except that one time in New Jersey.
Absolute facts. But also besides the fact that hosting a sporting event at MetLife Stadium is almost similar to a family visiting their grandmothers house, The traffic going from there into New York City is an absolute nightmare
I like you guys stadium. It’s one of the coolest ones I’ve seen before sofi and alliegent came along
Edit: vikings stadium
@@worstgamer1162 I’m a giants fan and MetLife is a terrible stadium in my opinion
You’re forgetting the one in Detroit.
most interesting thing to happen here in a while 😞
I would love to see the Super Bowl played in the snow
Goodell .... " but but but ,,, head EXPLODES .
Imagine halftime though🥶🥶
I'll take my living room, if that ever happens.
Then bring it to Buffalo in February.
@@adaveo8396 wish they would cancel halftime shows
Love how this video was made BEFORE the sewage pipe explosion in the box seats AND the non-load-bearing safety rail collapse, and FedEx Field was still at the top of the "No way in hell" heap.
Yeah now with that it’s definitely not hosting a super bowl
The Snowflakes would melt in the glair of the world watching a
Super Bowl in there Stadium.
I believe that's ranked the worst stadium in the NFL.
And two years later, hasn't changed a bit
Me being too poor to go to one anyways: “Yeah that stadium sucks”
Lmao too relatable
It's igh bro I'm too poor too but fuck it we'll just watch from home comfortably with a big ass jersey on and sum chips and shit
Me having been to a Super Bowl…
When given the opportunity to drop $100 for a ticket to see my beloved Raiders in the Super Bowl a mere 2 hour drive away on my birthday about 8 hours before kickoff…
I gave a hard no. I told my buddy he should go. But it is a weird vibe. The crowd is not partisan and mainly people who are there to say they were at the Super Bowl.
After the game he agreed. He was surrounded by people who were there for an event and not a game. He will never go to another Super Bowl, either.
Don’t feel too bad about that. 85 percent of the population of the United States and 97 percent of the globe can’t afford those tickets.
@@conorlauren "$100" "Raiders in the Superbowl" Jesus fucking Christ, speaking of Jesus you probably grew up with him💀💀💀💀💀
Honestly I'm looking forward to win Allegiant stadium hosts a Super Bowl cuz a Super Bowl in Las Vegas is pretty much a no brainer plus that stadium looks beautiful
this ratio also looks beautiful
Same here but the main problem is the Davis Torch since it’s a Raiders only tradition
@@AYoungAdultOnRUclips Didn’t stop Raymond James Stadium, with its pirate ship, from hosting it.
@@Yeen125 can’t argue that other than would they light it up or not
@@barrymccockiner5321 Kids still say ratio?? Thats cringey
Why the hell would Houston not host another Superbowl? Houston fits every criteria
You're forgetting that, while the Met Life game had surprisingly decent weather DURING the game, a MASSIVE storm hit right after the game. That pretty much ended any outdoor stadium in cold weather cities from ever getting another Super Bowl. I'm shocked that Allegiant hasn't gotten a Super Bowl scheduled yet. I would have thought they would be on the list right after Sofi.
That’s right it snowed RIGHT AFTER
Woah
Sofi was in the pipes last time they assigned a bulk of games. Allegiant had just missed it. 2024 is open because they didn’t want to split the city with Marci gras. I fully expect the league to announce SB 58 is being hosted by Vegas sometime this year
@@yaboilettuce7394 That makes sense!
Met life I believe is also set to host the 2026 World Cup final. So we'll see how that one works out.
5:45 I thought you were going to say when Heinz Field was completely demolished by terrorists in The Dark Knight Rises 😏
RIP to all the deceased in that terrible tragedy.
AT least we can all remember when Jean Claude Van Dam played goalie for the pens that one time
@CZsWorld..... what about Godzilla destroying Fenway Park in King of Monsters..
@@george-cann in game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals and the Igloo roof actually opened, but a helicopter crashed into the ice! Also, it made Iceburgh look evil! 🤣
Why would you make a smirking emoji?
Lambeau's the least surprising hard no you could have. I remember the question being asked regionally back in the mid-90s, and at that time, someone gave a great stat that answered the question forever for me: the Super Bowl at the time had about 2200 credentialed members of the media go to the week, and there were less than 1200 hotel rooms within an hour of Lambeau.
they should do it anyways, force the reporters to camp out in the woods
The Green Bay Press Gazette did an article about the requirements for hosting a Super Bowl, and even taking into account lodging further away than an hour in Door County, they STILL wouldn't have enough.
lambeau field has zero parking as well
@@JeremiahDouglas That's true. If you have a home or business within walking distance of Lambeau, you can typically charge between $10 and $30 for cars to park on your property.
In my opinion playing in lambeau is the most difficult task out the season during winter. Maybe beginning of season you can get away with it. Once January and playoffs hit its crazy. Even when the 49ers beat the packers last year damn near half their team got injured cas of playing there in that weather
I’m not sure why you think that Houston will not host again. It has the Stadium, two Airports, ranked in the top ten of Hotel rooms and average temperature for February is 64 degrees. Not to mention the nightlife.
Houston is like, core rota bro, all they have to do is not play in a sewage landfill and the NFL will give them a game every 10 years or so
Also just hosted the College National Championship, the Final Four last year and will host World Cup games as well.
"Nothing in life is certain, except for death, taxes, and Philadelphia never hosting a super bowl"
-A wise person
Philadelphia is a cold weather city you dope
Yes, I know considering I live near Philly
@@jamarerashaanmcdonald187 Philly weather wise
really is no worse then NYC and they some how had one a few years ago
@@natewill1464 NYC also has roughly 8 times the population Philly does.
@@Cruising_On_Lake_Havasoma Philly basically merges into the NYC market anyway, Heck technically the teams are from Jersey.
I get why Philly would never host a Superbowl... But saying cause of tourists reasons is a lazy take , you got so many historical places in Philly it's not even funny 😂
And what is he talking about turd eaters 7:58
@@gramps5157 this guy is a CLAWN
@@gramps5157I'm guessing he's talking about the fan that ate horse shit after we won the Super Bowl.
@@gramps5157 last time Philly won a Super Bowl an Eagles fan literally ate horse shit on the street in celebration. I didn't believe it either when I heard comedian Bill Burr mention it but you can easily look up the footage if you dare.
The tourism crack was way off base. Philly has a lot of tourism now. It's got the biggest downtown outside of Chicago and NYC. There is plenty to do and see. I won't defend Eagles fans, though.
Honestly Super Bowl 50 would’ve been the perfect season to have a Super Bowl at Lambeau.
Agreed. I can't remember where 50 was, just knew it was the Broncos vs the Panthers.
@@alexa5675 I think it was in cali
@@alexa5675 it was in Santa Clara at the Niners new stadium
Lambeau is a shithole
Nah. No to cold weather superbowls. The ultimate game should be played in neutral weather to determine the best team. Don't want a team winning because they got an assist from mother nature.
Wait... Nashville is about 300 seats away from a capacity of 69,420? They gotta make a small upgrade and put the SB in that city. Especially SB 69.
There is a ton of tourist attractions in Philly, take that back. Betsy Ross house, Liberty Bell, Love park, City Hall, Art Museum, and Cheesesteak spots
I would love a Super Bowl in the north. The game was designed to be an all-weather game. Not a track contest. Southern college teams wouldn't have nearly the success they have had in the playoff game if the games were in harsher elements.
With that said, I was bumped to see how the weather affected the Bucs-Pats this year, which to me was the most anticipated game (which doesn't include my favorite team.) I wouldn't like a team to be at a disadvantage due to the weather.
You have to think of half time shows etc. Plus more people are bound to showup in warmer conditions
@@Luuth I remember the game in Minneapolis. It was so cold. The game was inside, but so many people stilled complained about the weather.
The weather can change a lot. I think Michigan defeated Ohio State in large part due to the weather. Michigan was tougher too which played a big role.
I get your point. And your reasoning is why the games will always be in good conditions. You are right. I just said what I said because personally I would like big games to be played in the North as well. A team like Notre Dame focuses so much on tight ends. They may have faired better versus Alabama last year had the conditions been bad.
All the NFL teams have to be balanced. But at college there certainly are some teams built for different conditions.
@@arnolddonaldson7129 The Game this year wasn't hugely impacted by the weather, I've been at Michigan games so much more impacted by both rain and snow than this year's was.
@@elh93 Of course it was impacted. The weather could have been much worse - but it was far from a fast track. The worse the weather becomes the more advantage goes to running teams. And Michigan had the better O-line and D-line. If the game was at Jerry's World, or a fast track, I think it would favor the Buckeyes.
I am not taking anything away from Michigan. It's Ryan Day's fault the Buckeyes are built like they are. They are built like a southern team playing in bad weather. Michigan wanted the game more and they were tougher. I am not sure why so many Michigan fans are gloating though. That's Michigan's 3rd win since Tressel was hired.
Gattis should have kept his mouth shut instead of calling Ohio State soft. That was a big mistake. I wouldn't be surprised if Day put that quote all around the football facilities.
So why aren't Northern College teams better in a decent environment?
NRG has hosted two already. No reason why NFL wouldn’t come back. Plus they were both noteworthy games. (28-3 and wardrobe malfunction).
If you’re not being paid handsomely by houston (both games were under the bid system) then why do you chose NRG/Houston over JerryWorld/Dallas
@@yaboilettuce7394 Houston is the better city. Dallas has a better stadium
true true H town deserves a SB just as much as New Orleans
Yeah Houston will probably get another
they should’ve put one in the astrodome back in the day. if they held one at rice…
As much as I would love to see Pittsburgh host and I know the Rooneys were pushing for it, that will always be a hard no. Hotel space and weather will always make this one impossible. Maybe if the Steelers ever get a dome but the City couldn’t afford a facility like that and the shear idea of ever having one goes completely against the identity of the team.
I sure as hell wouldn’t leave my house that weekend! Traffic and crowds would be a nightmare!
When "fair weather fan" takes on a literal meaning.
Nobody gives a crap about “the identity of [your] team.”
IMO, Pittsburgh is a great city for a potential SuperBowl host. It's easy to navigate and everything is close.
@@thethreatwrestling.7053 Tree, is that you?
I know it will NEVER happen but could you imagine a blizzard Super Bowl in Green Bay. The historical significance of the location is just insane. It would be magical and a bid to the past of football. Am I bias? Massively.
Literally would be The modern day Version of The IceBowl
I want to see a bad weather super bowl game just one in the modern era
Who doesn't love snow games, Green Bay, Pittsburgh, Buffalo all good for a few snow games a year
green bay needs a super bowl.
@@kurtpunchesthings2411 no its not always like that in wisconsin. that was actually extreme weather for even wisconsin. so it wouldnt be quite that bad.
“No matter how many strokes of luck Robert Kraft would need” lol I see what you did there
With all these corporate names, I have no idea what cities most are in.
RE: Seattle - it rains 150 days per year on average in Seattle but the actual amount of rain is 37 inches/year on average. Much of the eastern seaboard gets more rain, for example NYC averaging 47 inches per year. It’s generally a light rain and I wouldn’t be surprised if they got one sometime soon
Atlanta gets more rain then Seattle.
Average rain in Miami is 62 inches but the vast majority of that is during the summer. Raining and 70 is a lot different than raining and 40.
Seattle isnt even in the top 10 of rainiest cities. I think its because we have a lot of cloudy or partly cloudy days, so we just have that reputation. Its too bad, Seattle would be a great Super Bowl experience.
@@Meme-zc4cw I’d say hell yeah because I love my city getting shine, I say hell no because I live in West Seattle and they need to fix this fucking bridge already.
@@JohnDoe-xo3lr Maybe if we got a Super Bowl it would light a fire under their ass to fix it. Its gone long enough. I live in the North End, so thankfully I dont have to deal with it.
It will be a nightmare If Philadelphia Host a Super Bowl
1: Traffic
2: Snow Storm
3: Airport Issues
4: Almost All Training Areas For Philadelphia Sports Are In Delaware or in New Jersey, and no one want to waste 10 dollars to train with gas
5: Lowest Placing Super Bowl Ever
6: NO ONE WANTS TO PAY 35 DOLLARS FOR A COAT IN PHILADELPHIA!!!!
7: Barley Any Outdoor Stadium Has Hosted A Super Bowl
8: They Are Trending For New Venues And Lincoln Financial Field, Wells Fargo Center, Subaru Arena, and Citizens Bank Park Won’t Make the cut
8: And To Top It all Off, Philadelphia Has The Insane Idea Of Bidding to Host The Super Bowl, NBA All Star Game, MLB World Series, The Stanley Cup for 2026! (Be laughing my butt off if the can’t host anything that year)
I Agree With All
And “Tampa Bay Bronconners” 😂😂😂😂I can’t……
And May I Present to you: The Tampa Bay Bronconners!
@@imdumbok6404 Where Do They Say That????
0:01
Some of the most memorable and fondly remembered games in many sports especially finals, are due to the crazy weather conditions at the time.
I still don’t think we would get a super bowl in Charlotte but we are probably going to have an even better chance after the renovations for our soccer team are done
i rlly hope we host one soon now that seattle has a chance to make one as a hawks fan in clt
Charlotte is a long shot but still plausible. Charlotte has enough hotel and infrastructure to support
Not happening and the fake grass turf is straight trash.
@@wllms02 to be fair if there was a shot of hosting a Superbowl they would make all necessary renovations so that they could, hosting a Superbowl brings in millions of dollars for that city lmao
charlotte’s just a little too far north for their weather requirements. though i think charlotte could work
With stadiums changing naming rights left and right, it would actually be easier to recognize the stadiums if you just called them "Browns Stadium", Seahawks Stadium". With the exception of a few, I can't keep up anymore.
Why would they do that when corporations are willing t o pay you millions of dollars to rename it as a marketing tactic for them.
He’s got the cities on there...
The changing sponsorships of Miami's stadium has become such a joke that I call the Dolphins' home [Your Name Here] Stadium.
@@TestTest-ei4gi true that.. just a shame how capitalism has corrupted good business practices.. if it were up to me, I would do like team names or city names for stadiums... But then in the early Super Bowls, they had marching bands from local colleges/high schools versus the highly paid celebrity singers of today's Super Bowls.. mind-boggling and fascinating how it's changed over the years..
Thank you.
I disagree with your review of Philadelphia. Superbowl 52 was held in Minneapolis during a snowstorm. Disappointing except for the game outcome. Philadelphia has been on the short-list to host the 2016 & 2024 Olympic Games & World Cup Soccer; it could assuredly host the Superbowl venue. Multi-complex of stadiums and arenas, 5 mins from PHL airport, I-95 highway/Amtrak rail access, more than a dozen casinos in the vicinity, the Mummers, ample restaurants, historic monuments/museums, beer gardens, strip clubs, drugs and hookers. Philly, not NYC has been the host of 2 of the largest rock concerts on the globe. Live Aid (1985) & Live 8 Concert (2005) both had over 1.5 million per in attendance. Thank you. "Here lies W.C Fields. I would rather be living in Philadelphia."
Recall that US Bank Stadium is an enclosed stadium. Lincoln Financial Field is not, and Philadelphia is quite cold in February. You mentioned Live Aid, the Olympics and the World Cup. All of these events take (took) place during the summer.
@@themanhimself427 agree with you on most of the points, but I can understand the weather issue here in Philly. Some of the earlier SB's were played in cold weather OUTSIDE. As it became more popular worldwide, of course the league wanted to provide a greater fan experience, which meant having the big game held in either a city with warmer climate and/or a dome.
It snows in Philly during that time!
For Denver, you didn’t even mention the biggest factor: the altitude.
Both Superbowl teams would wear down by the 2nd quarter. Unless they both arrive two weeks before the game. That way, they'll both be acclimated to the climate.
I think if they created some sort of heater system/heated up field…they should be fine
Denver would not happen for precisely that reason. One of the players could have sickle cell and be unable to play there at all (which has already happened). Denver should absolutely be in the hell no category
@@wanderingvetcj sorry - have to disagree…the “altitude” thing is wayyy overstated…what’s the percentage of players actually having medical issues ?? Ryan Clark was the only one…there hasn’t been a Bronco player affected in a long time if ever, because if there were, it would be news for weeks..
@@marka.graffakasnakebitenat3736 most players have played in that stadium its not like its on mars somewhere LOL relax
Given that the Panthers owner is looking to build a new retractable roof stadium sometime in the near future, Charlotte’s chances of hosting a Super Bowl will go up substantially.
Charlotte should host a Super Bowl. Uptown Charlotte is perfect for nightlife. They just need to get their hotel game up.
New stadium talks excited
In 2012 I took two of my Children to Super bowl village the week leading up to Super bowl XLVI(46)In Indianapolis,we had a great time and INDY an Awesome Job of hosting. We also did the Indianapolis Childrens Museum,I live in the Ft. Wayne Market,so getting there wasn't that hard,I believe INDY could host another Super bowl by the 2030's
I agree with you. We live in Greenwood and had a great Super Bowl experience. We must admit that we got lucky with the weather...
exactly! I highly doubt that Indy would not ever be selected to host
I went to that SB and the weather was unseasonably nice! The temp dropped on that Monday too if I remember correctly.
Ain't no way nobody going to Soldier Field or Arrowhead Stadium in February to watch a Super Bowl game
I say only if one of those teams happen to host and play then people would show up but the likelihood isn't promising
I'll bet every cent in my bank account that both of those stadiums would still be sold out
@@RobGilmore69 You're probably right Rob
if my steelers were in the super bowl at soldier field and i could somehow afford it… hell yes
It would most definitely still sell out. Hell, I'd bet everything I have that it would. Would be cold, but they could make it work.
Bob Kraft needing a few "strokes" of luck.
I see what you did there.
Considering that we rejected both the Olympics and an IndyCar race, Imma gonna say fuck off to the big game too.
@@alaeriia01 Smart man. Denver once got the Olympics too, but they awarded it BEFORE the vote on actually paying for it. Said vote lost in a landslide and they ended up moving the Olympics to somewhere in Europe. Austria, I think.
@@Cruising_On_Lake_Havasoma yeah it was Innsbruck..
Happy ending happy ending!
The game would have a true happy ending.
9:32 Being downtown would actually help Soldier Field. For people coming from out of town, there is decent transit to get to the stadium from your hotel.
I remember thinking the Colts had a chance of winning a superbowl at their home stadium. Then Peyton had a neck surgery and they went like 2-14 😆
Ahhhhh, the suck for Luck season.
It probably wouldn’t be for a while but I could see Indy hosting the game again.
If it doesn't happen in a decade won't happen. Would love it tho I think it would be very cool.
I would like to see that its a cool stadium that is constantly over looked
nah. stadium isn’t brand new so i don’t see it. lucas oil stadium is really nice but i don’t think it happens again
I live in Indy. The 2012 SB actually came off quite well which bolstered some to think it might happen again but yeah I think it’s a slim chance.
Update! A new 2 billion dollar state of the art stadium will be getting built in Nashville for the Titans so we can host the Super Bowl with retractable roof.
I am curious to see how a Super Bowl in Las Vegas goes. Probably going to be better than Miami, minus the beach. I could definitely see it being the biggest grossing Super Bowl in terms of money/economic impact.
I would love to see a Super Bowl played in Charlotte, and with the Panthers practice facility/HQ being built down the road in Rock Hill, I could see the boxes being checkmarked. Only thing would be hotel space, but I think it's almost there.
Tired of seeing Super Bowls given to New Orleans. Same could be said for Miami, but I understand the pull there.
I actually made a whole video about it :)
Why don't they rarely have them in Jacksonville's Jags stadium?
Why is it always Miami or Tampa Bay?
@@krowman8458 supposedly due to hotel space. The only Super Bowl they hosted, they had to bring in a cruise ship to hold more people.
I still think another should be held there, especially if Shad Khan builds a new facility. Miami and NO Super Bowls are just overdone. Let’s see some different places host it.
@Cole... It won't happen The NFL and Goodell hate the Raiders ... they won't give them anything
@@williamwilkinson381 They announced 2 weeks ago that the Superbowl is going to be held in Las Vegas in 2024
I love how we are all unanimous in the fact that FedEx Field is the worst NFL Stadium by a country mile. Literally no redeeming qualities about it at all.
not hardly, well designed and actually a much better venue than some I have been to. Really stupid and misinformed comment, have you actually been to a game there?
@@bob80q Ok, Mr. Sewage.
@@christianramirez9303 thats Snyder's burner
FedEx field probably has one of the nicest stadium layouts tho with how the parking is and how the stadium is right in the middle of the parking. I think it looks pretty cool from birds eye view
@@bob80q FedEx Field is a dump. There were just sewage leakage in the stadium a few weeks ago
I’ll watch the Super Bowl again when it’s played in snow. It’s January, it’s supposed to be cold!
I feel like Houston will get more Super Bowls and Lucas Oil might, if Indy cleans up the area. As a Tampa resident, I wonder if when the Bucs' lease is up in 2028, RayJay will get a Miami-like renovation with a canopy, or a new retractable roof facility will be built. Games are brutally hot there until about mid October.
That’s something I’ve never understood. We sat on hot uncomfortable bleachers in the Sombrero, and they build a new stadium with no cover from the elements.
We do have a pirate ship that fires cannons though……
@@jacklandaupresents It's the same reason the Rays will need another indoor stadium (if they stay in the market), Aug and Sept are miserable here. If the Bucs can stay competitive after Brady retires, I think we have a case for a retractable roof stadium.
Why houston over Dallas. And the 2012 Super Bowl was part of the deal to get a new dome from Indiana
@@yaboilettuce7394 That's like saying "Why should Tampa get a SB when Miami is right there?" Houston has been exploding in size for decades now. For every 3 SBs that Dallas hosts, I see Houston getting 1.
Indy has built itself to be a convention city. They have the hotels and infrastructure, but the cold and areas near the stadium work against it. I don't see why Minneapolis would get another SB before Indy.
@@91_C4_FL I worked the Superbowl in Tampa and was talking to some people who have worked more than me and every single person who worked in Minneapolis said it was miserable, and a bunch more said they skipped it cause of that
As a KC fan, arrowhead stadium is awesome, but we get blizzards and -5 degree weather in February lol
Or it could be in the 70s in February... The same week
To teams who make a Super Bowl: You're supposedly one of the best teams in football yes? *It rains. It snows. The wind, it blows. It gets hot and cold. Deal with it.*
Id love to see a Super Bowl in Arrowhead, but we all know it's not happening. I'm surprised it got into the "maybe" category to be honest. Like you said, the chances of a massive winter storm are just too high.
@@lukew1383 I totally agree with that. It’s probably cause the stadium is so nice mostly
@@ZiggyZou I think it's nice too, but I'm also very biased!
I think Lucas oil should be a maybe. I remember during and after we hosted, people were talking about how they loved how accessible the city was.
This is one reason why they move the draft around now. A city that can’t host the super bowl can at least host a few days worth of draft festivities
Exactly..also I'm noticing that the draft has become a big and fun way to get familiar with the NFL for newcomers or casual fans and to razz different teams and rep your teams.. btw Go Raiders! 😎👍
@@jamesreynolds5776 True. I went to the draft when it came here to Cleveland this year, it was a lot of fun. Definitely want to go to the one in Vegas next year.
No matter how badly the NFL wants to deny it, football is a cold weather sport. It's boring watching games played in oversized hotel lobbies at room temperature, I want to see snow. Imagine the Super Bowl at Orchard Park, no matter who's playing, in 6 inches of snow and 20°. That's when you start to see the truly talented players shine, and a little chaos can be good. It would be amazing.
Like how all the skilled position players played in the monsoon in SF? Truly talented players are neutered in bad weather. It becomes a game of who can block the best and turn the ball over the least. We've seen that NFL before and it didn't sell.
@@stevejones148 Actually, the skilled players are able to rise above the conditions. Jerry Kramer and the Green Bay offensive line in the Ice Bowl is an excellent example, one of the best championship games in the history of football. It's boring to play indoors.
@@shipofthesun So your one example expands on my point? Strange way to prove your point about skilled position players in today's game playing great in bad weather by going back to Vince Lombardi and Jerry Kramer and the O-line.
Sure, ok.
@@shipofthesun Hold the L and move on.
Lambeau deserves to hold a super bowl
Lucas Field was a big success. Everyone loves their experience there. Will be back for sure
Considering it’s a 13 year hiatus at the absolute minimum, don’t hold your breath. I’d expect to see the 9ers or Dallas host one before them who are also staring down 10+ year hiatuses. The pattern of Miami, Tampa, New Orleans, and Arizona hosting the vast majority will continue, just throw SoFi into the rotation now. It’s not a coincidence either that all these cities host the major college bowl games in January either.
It took 16 Super Bowls before the NFL left these cities when they started out and they’ve continued on with it for good reason. They’re good places to host the events.
I think NRG might get one more crack at a Super Bowl. After all, if the Super Dome and Raymond James host regularly (both of which are older than NRG, and Raymond James additionally is under 70,000 and in an objectively worse/smaller city), then nothing's stopping NRG.
Being within pissing distance of a better facility in Dallas is what will stop another houston SB. Jerry world is a better facility than NRG
@@yaboilettuce7394 it will be a bit before Jerry World gets another one. They’re still pissed over that seating debacle.
@@yaboilettuce7394 I’m from Dallas. The Jerry world super bowl was a disaster. Houston hosts a much better super bowl event than North Texas.
Dallas🚦 would be worse in my opinion
See Tampa has something that is only matched by Miami, beaches. And the City of Tampa is just one part of the area of Tampa Bay.
There's no reason why Houston can't host another SuperBowl
As a Denver resident and native, imma challenge on Mile High Stadium. Denver has the infrastructure, major airport, plenty of hotels as well as practice fields for each team. The weather during super bowl 54 was actually warmer in Denver than in Miami. The altitude is the only detractor but we have pot for that.
Dude said "guaranteed to snow" as if Denver is some huge snow palace all winter. Not true at all
@@ilikemusak right? People group Denver into the Midwest when it comes to snow fall. It’s not that bad and the snow is usually gone in a day or two.
Plus, you’d figure for some of the high rollers that’d come to a Denver based Super Bowl, they’d have the ski resorts and what not to host parties and what not at before the game.
Absolutely. I mean February's are usually pretty mild in Denver BUT.... the chance that it could snow is just enough to keep them away. In fact, there's been some nasty cold fronts and snowstorms in February these recent years.
A couple of decades ago, Philly bid on a SB at the Vet, and were actually one of the finalists with a lot of consideration given. They addressed the routy fans issue by installing a legal Courtroom and several jail cells right in the basement of the stadium (true story). The Court and cells got a lot of use during Mets vs. Phillies baseball games.
I took a tour of Lincoln Financial and I literally asked the guy who was the tour guy can I see the courtroom can I see the jails that built into Lincoln Financial and a guy said I can't take you to the courtroom I can't take you to the jail cell well here's the largest bar built into into a stadium ever and I'm a Bills fan and Giants fan
And in terms of the reputation of Philly sports fans, that courtroom was the worst thing that could have happened. Everyone loves to take cheap shots at Philly fans, as if the Linc and the Vet were the only stadiums ever to have snowball incidents, and that courtroom is constantly brought up as an example of how supposedly out of hand Philly fans are.
until the Eagles won the SB and fans were punching horses and eating feces.
@@markmac2206 like Tampa cramming fans in during a pandemic before a vaccine got widely distributed?
@@jerryjanik480 those were in Veterans Stadium, not LFF.
the fact that Denver gets 300 days of sunshine a year and that we normally have a dry climate and less and less snow every year should make us a contender for a superbowl. 1 we have the hotels. 2. we have the space. 3. we have indoor practice spaces. 4 the weather isnt that bad actually better then the Meadow lands and they made that happen. 4. This is a hardcore NFL city in the heart of the city. 5. just stop being a hater yes it might be cold and yes there is a potential for snow but why not!
Wind, Snow & Altitude.
How about NO! Not hating , Denver just not a party city, you don’t hear anyone say lets go to Denver.
@@aguirrebullzz unless you’re a stoner 😳
@@AlanHernandez-jn2mp doesn't frequently get very windy around here. Altitude isn't that big of a deal and snow unless its a blizzard which rarely happens doesn't last long
@@Mari0slayar The Broncos literally named their stadium after their altitude..
It's a BIG deal when it comes to high performance.. Athletes & Vehicles who struggle to get air at high altitudes.
Undebatable, Sorry.
Detroit hosted 2 Superbowl's in the past, once at Pontiac Silverdome in 1981 49ers vs Bengals, and 2005 at Ford Field Seahawks vs Steelers.
As a Bengals fan I thank you for being so nice and concise, I feel like you could’ve spent the whole video on just reasons why Cincinnati will never host a super bowl
Sadly i know too being from Cincy we had no chance lol, even though UC is right down the road 😂
Mike Brown is broke and needs a tax break just to break ground on a indoor practice facility.
Detroit
He didn’t even spell cincinnati right in the vid
Just a quick no and moves on to next team 😂
They probably gonna eye Philly for super bowl 2026 because that year is Americas 250th birthday and Philly is already set to host the MLB world series that year
Nashville has everything except, you know…
A stadium ready for it…
Nashville only has 1 hotel with over a thousand rooms. The NFL requires the host city of the super bowl to have 4.
@@Damianoutlaw does that include suburbs though? When you factor in Murfreesboro, Smyrna, Mt Juliet, and gallitin you wouldn’t think lodging would be an issue. I do hope we eventually put a dome on Nissan stadium though.
I understand from a broadcast/casual fan perspective why they want nice weather for the super bowl, but removing all stadiums that have a chance of snow/rain/general cold takes away from so much of what makes football, football and is a big mistake by the NFL imo.
You'd think it's a mistake until you end up with a Super Bowl like the Patriots/Bills Monday night football game in Buffalo. Where the Pats threw the ball a grand total of 3 times during the entire game due to weather.
From a sentimentality standpoint, I agree with you but from a practical/entertainment stand point, you wouldn't want a potential match btwn a Tom Brady/Aaron Rodgers to be crippled by atrocious weather. The NFL has become a QB driven league and you want your marquee event to display its best talent
The Conference Championships , at least, are played on the pertinent fields regardless of weather! Historically, NFL Conference Championship games have often been more exciting, better games than the Super Bowl game that follows them.
It's more about the top-spending fans in attendance than it is about the quality of the games. You can't put on a major event with VIPs and a half time show in cold weather or winter precipitation.
@@carltonharvey You're using Rodgers as your example against holding the Superbowl in a poor climate!!!!
Have you seen the weather in Greenbay???
Freezing cold conditions and Rodgers still puts on legendary performances every week.
@@carltonharvey Tom Brady and Aaron Rodgers have both played in bad weather for years. Unless it was a blizzard and below zero. Their performances would not be affected by that much. Besides that bad weather has made for some memorable football games like the famous Ice Bowl in Green Bay in 1967 between the Cowboys and the Packers.
One of the main things that makes football great for me is that the games are played in any weather except for lightning and hurricanes. The Super Bowl is a little different in that there are a lot more events going on that week besides just the game. And the Super Bowl is usually held in cities that are big in the tourist industry. Having saying that I would love to see the Super Bowl played in a snowstorm.
The Indy SB was listed as one of the best ever. We host all kinds of major sporting events . Don’t count out Indy for another
Cincinnati couldn't host because they barely even have one "practice facility" and no indoor facility
Don't need an indoor facility if you never play passed December
Everybody here that wants to see the game played in cold weather needs to remember that the NFL and most people who aren't really football fans see the game as an afterthought. The League is far more invested in the pregame stuff and the halftime show than they are invested in the game no matter what the official position on this subject is. They are never going to accept a stadium where chances are high that some major music star has to try and put on a show in the middle of a rain or snow storm.
And honestly lets be real here. The number of interesting competitive Super Bowls is a pretty small percentage of the total number of times it's been played. With so many boring blow outs in the big game the NFL practically has to sell it as an event that is far more than just a championship game just to keep most people interested.
For the Titans you could have said the seating capacity just comes up a yard short.
Nice!
Underrated comment
As a Titans fan, that hurts lmao
Damn bro that's cold.
Tampa may have been the first team to win in their home stadium, but they weren't the first to win in their home market. That honor goes to the 49ers who won at Stanford University in SB XIX
Did he say why he put NRG in houston on the hosted but probably never will again column? The stadium is still fairly new, houston definitely has the hotel space, there are indoor venues right next door like george r brown where they could have gameday experience indoors, and there is a convertible roof on the stadium so weather wouldnt be a factor. From what ive read Houston is towards the top of the list even skipping some teams, and all that would be asked is a little upkeep of NRG. The stadium wouldnt even need much. I'd think it would be nearly a certain thing they will host the SB again soon
Bro man always finds a way to piss me off with a 28-3 joke 😭
Another thing working against Baltimore for the Super Bowl - Beginning of February is almost always marred by snowstorms/ice storms. Stopped counting how many birthdays (2/8) were spent watching falling ice and/or snow from the living room window.
Ah yes, February Nor’easters!
the biggest thing working against Baltimore is the fact that tourists and fans to the game wont want to walk down the sidewalk and get mugged or just outright shot because your city government is about the same as DC, soft on crime
Whenever it is mentioned that Tampa Bay winning the Super Bowl in 2021 was the first time a team had won in it’s home stadium that is true. But, in Super Bowl 1985, the San Francisco 49ers defeated the Miami dolphins At Stanford Stadium in Palo Alto, California. True, the 49ers home stadium at the time was candlestick Park in San Francisco. But Stanford Stadium was only about 30 miles from candlestick Park. Further, the San Francisco 49ers were technically the host team for the 1985 Super Bowl.
Also, the Steelers_Rams SB in the 1979 season was played in the Rose Bowl
Whole lot of words to basically say the 49er's never hosted the super bowl in their own stadium
Well, it happened again.
@@brianfitzsimmons6074 Whole lot of words to prove you dont understand what 'Neutral Site' means! If you played at a high school field, but in your home market, it isnt a Neutral Site'!! 30 minutes from Candle stick is convenient for 49ers fans, unless they all walk everywhere! Geez, man!
Plus, in October 1989 the 49ers actually played a home game in Stanford Stadium following the earthquake that damaged Candelstick.
KC fan here. A couple of notes on the maybe of Arrowhead: being that we are used to cold winters we have quite a bit of big, indoor spaces for practices. Also as for the field, I know they put in heaters and amazing drainage under the field a few years ago. If it happened, it would be awesome to see a Super Bowl while it was snowing, while not having to deal with inches of snow on the ground.
the bigger concern with KC is that the town gets hammered by a storm ruining all of the festivities leading up to the Super Bowl. As a football fan, I care less about that - but the league does not. The league doesn't want to gamble on a place unless there is a big payoff. While weather isn't the reason it's not going to be there, no one is bending over backwards unless you're going to provide some upside like "New York" (cough Jersey cough).
KC is a lot higher on the list though (of potential suitors that have never gotten one) than many of the others.
There's a bias against KC for something they cannot control. If they can hold it at Mile High Stadium where it snows 6 months out of a year plus the high altitude, there's honestly no other major excuse to be listed here. The rest can be worked around. They got KU's football stadium in Lawrence to practice at with no issues there. Plus KC's infrastructure is improving, just give it a chance, huh?
Another knock the area around the Truman Sports complex is the area has went downhill big time. Used to live 10 minutes from the Stadiums. In the 70s walked to many games mainly Royals games.
I drive by the old neighborhood once in a while sad to see all the trash along Raytown road and Ozark & Skiles road.
They have the World cup coming soon hoping K.C Will clean up the area before then.
@@Nighthawke70 they're much more likely to have it in arrowhead than mile high lmao
I wanna see a Superbowl in the blistering cold and snow
One thing going for Arrowhead is now that it's confirmed that it will host the world cup, Kansas City is planning on doing a lot to improve the infrastructure around the stadium including transport and hotel accommodations.
The KC airport is also nearly done with a massive renovation that adds a larger, more modern terminal.
The main issue for KC will be the weather at that point.
Soccer in the snow? Fuck me, I'd watch that shit
@@spagbol525 The 2026 World Cup will be in summer tho
I think a superbowl in the snow would be awesome and I think lots of people would go even if it's cold and snowy.
@@spagbol525 bro are you dumb the world cup happens in the summer and it doesn't snow in the summer
I would love to see a Super Bowl be contested in a cold weather environment. As a Canadian some of my fondest memories of Grey Cup's are the games that are contested in winter conditions want to see what I mean look up the highlights from the 1996 Grey Cup
I guess like the 1967 NFC Championship game at Green Bay (Ice Bowl) -13F, -25C at opening kickoff
The dream would be to see
Alaska get a Super Bowl now that would be interesting.
If only Alaska had a massive stadium to do so.
A Super Bowl in Alaska would make for an interesting game wether wise.
I would not mind seeing a
Super Bowl in Toronto.
@@alanfox691 Anchorage would be a great place for a superbowl
Tbh a Snow Super Bowl, be fun to see on TV and not in person
Landover mall got shut down a year before FedEx field came about in Landover. I still remember that.
They need to play every couple of years In a foul weather stadium, let’s get some -5 temps and a foot of snow lol
Sorry to rain on your parade but that will never happen. No one wants to pay that kinda money to go to the super bowl to sit in a -5 degree ice box. Also weather should not be a factor in the most important game of the year.
@@nateboertman1494 But by playing only playing it in warm climate weather does become a factor as it favors the teams that are used to those conditions. Greenbay for example would be at a huge disadvantage if they had to play in California when the players aren't acclimated to warm weather.
Take it from a Scotsman if you are only used to the cold then the heat becomes an issue.
@@nateboertman1494 apparently didn’t rain on anyone’s parade, as of this moment he has 51 likes and you have zero.
@@24magiccarrot Honestly, it would be interesting if you had two warm-weather teams going into the Super Bowl, then you throw the "neutral ground" up in Green Bay or Minneapolis where both teams, both not accustomed to the cold, have to deal with freezing conditions as an ultimate test of skill. This is the Super Bowl after all and that would be a nice X-factor to throw in, especially considering the weather was part of the reason the Ice Bowl is known as such a great game. Alternatively, if you do end up with a Super Bowl between two cold-weather teams, why not just say cold weather stadium is fair neutral ground for that season and throw some cold stadiums into the mix?
@@harleymitchelly5542 Problem is supebowl tickets are sold well in advance of knowing which teams are going to be in the superbowl as such the stadium needs to be selected well in advance of knowing what the teams are.
The lack of a Super Bowl at First Energy Stadium is particularly devastating because it has never hosted a Browns playoff game either since opening in 1999.
I feel every stadium, no matter what, should be allowed to host the Super Bowl. The NJ game I feel opened the door for more cold-weather Super Bowls.
Agreed. Every city should get a shot
There are hotels, lots of parking, and the stadium is easily accessible. The weather being right off Lake Erie in Feb can be awful. Super cold or a big snowstorm or both. Even a mild weather day is low to mid 30s or 40s. Off the lake it feels a lot colder. The only way a super bowl possible hosted there is to put a dome on it but still doubtful.
You forgot to mention that most of the No stadiums have ramped crime in the area.
4th and Mile High is gonna show up. I’d like to see Seattle host a super bowl
What Five either missed or neglected to mention is that Seattle's parking situation is equally abysmal. The stadium is mere walking distance from Pioneer Square, it's right next to a highway off-ramp, which isn't I-5, mind you; I-5 is three blocks away on the other side. Seattle has enough problems housing their own residents, how in the hell would they fit another 100K people in maybe the most cramped corridor in the entire region?
I used to live in Washington, and February Washington weather is awful. Would love to see it though!
If Seattle’s weather wasn’t so bad that stadium would be incredible for a Super Bowl
Seattle's stadium is built to amplify crowd noise to the point it interferes with conduct of the game and can damage the hearing of people in the crowd (over 115 dB is unhealthy, Seattle reaches over 145). It is no place to hold a championship game.
@@scottbilger9294 you mean Superbowl because Seattle has host a nfc championship game lol
Honestly, Nashville’s booming infrastructure and the area’s love for all sports could make it a quite possible host for a Super Bowl within the next 10-25 years. Plus, this video doesn’t include possible stadium upgrades, including temporary grandstands for increased capacity. Nissan Stadium’s 69,000 capacity seating is already close to the requirements. Maybe some added grandstands to the endzones may help the city in getting a Super Bowl bid.
If Nashville gets to be a 2026 World Cup Host City. This will move up the timeline big time.
BTW: Five Points Vids should do a tier list ranking the 2026 World Cup Candidate Cities to see which cities will be selected as World Cup Host Cities. The final announcement will be announced probably by the end of 2021 (Probably November or December.
Nashville only has 1 hotel with over a thousand rooms. The NFL requires the host city of the super bowl to have at least 4.
@@Damianoutlaw Do you think Nashville will become a World Cup Host City?
Playing A Super Bowl In the Snow will be Freaking Fun. Haha
I remember the super bowl in Jacksonville and I was living here and still am and it was so fun. It felt like a whole entertainment hotspot. Hopefully they’ll host it again but we need some entertainment, more hotel rooms, and better transportation to do so.
Fr! I live in Jax, and would love to see it. The way the city is moving, though, is great and the more businesses, residences, and hotels the better!
@@Lyerbait13 exactly!
If they get some more hotels built, they could be in business to host the game again. I recall that they had to bring in some cruise ships to get everyone sheltered.
One of the main reasons why Indy's Super Bowl was successful was the weather was USUALLY warm that week. Very very rare to see 60 degrees in February on one day but the entire week is phenomenal in itself. Indy got so lucky with that. Plus they introduced the zip line and the was probably the biggest hit besides the game itself.
Indiana weather is absolutely unpredictable. The only good thing is it is rarely extreme. A few years ago one of my uncles died in January and I'll never forget the graveside service being like 80 degrees. Probably snowed the next day, but don't recall for sure.
@@jeremywj damn I don't ever remember hitting 80 degrees in January here. That would be probably one of the rarest feats ever here. I remember a few years back (I think 2017, maybe) it was in the 70's in February. That year was extremely warm even throughout the summer it was hot and miserable.
They'd have it in Buffalo if people were into igloo building, show shoeing, freezing your nuts off competition, etc.....
That one Superbowl we had in Jacksonville between Pats & Eagles had the city on 🔥
🔥🔥🔥🔥🦅🦅🦅
I love the Kraft "strokes" reference to his days at the ole Orchid Day Spa in sunny FLA.
You burned FedEx pretty good - I believe the NFL would play the Super Bowl in Hawaii, St. Louis or Orlando before they awarded it to that dive bar of a stadium.
Short answer: Any outdoor stadium north of D.C. (save NYC in 2014).
I think the biggest reason they went to a criteria format to decide who gets the supper bowl is because they want the owners and the home cities to up grade their stadiums.
I agree with Sam Darnold. That jab at the Panthers was completely uncalled for.
I love Lucas Oil. I was just in Indy and the infrastructure is still there. All the new hotels built are still there and the new convention center is huge.
Frankly, the worse the weather is, the better that game is to watch.
Honestly I think a super bowl in Baltimore would be good since depending on the team you could probably get that thing into full capacity and not to mention it’s like a hour from DC
Roger Godell hates Baltimore.
It still wouldn't happen, but the winter weather in Denver is getting more mild by the year. Plenty of infrastructure and practice space to go along with a nice stadium
One of the perks of global warming eh? 😉
i do agree with u about the infrastructure, practice space and nice stadium, denver would be good for a super bowl especially with I-25 and Us-6 and 40 right next to the stadium providing easy access (well hopefully, bc traffic gets worse every year), however February is the most bitter part of winter in Denver. Feb-Mar Have have the coldest Temps and the most snow. Colorado's weather is so unpredictable that it could be 60° and sunny or -10° with a huge blizzard. We've had a few yr span with late snow and mild Temps, until 2019, its been brutal from December to early April here in the winter with some of the worst storms we've ever had and some record breaking lows. What makes it even crazier is within the last few years after a huge blizzard with single digit temps its always like extremely warm with mid spring weather right after
@@aidenhernandez7762 yeah but homie in the video said "guaranteed snow" which is just total b.s.
@@aidenhernandez7762 you’re incorrect, the most snow in Denver falls in March and April. Stick to talking about what you know and don’t make stuff up.
@@ilikemusak Also he’s wrong anyway
Confirmed today the Titans are getting a new stadium in hopes of hosting a SB
1:37 skip the ads
Thank you
The Jaguars could most definitely host another superbowl, but they would have to do it in London. 🤣🤣🤣
Lmaoooooo
If it did because of the big timezone difference between the UK and us for the American audience it would be super bowl morning
if i owned an nfl franchise, our stadium would have to become a retractable dome at minimum, just so we can have a shot at hosting the big game…and college bowl games and stuff
I want to see Lambeau host a super bowl once in my lifetime
Better hope for eternal life.
I think Seattle or anywhere in the Northeast could get it. The stadium is close enough to Downtown to be a success even if it’s overcast. Also NY held it 2013 and many in NY saw it as a success so that makes any Northeast team on the coast a viable contender
LumenField is astride the growing LINK Light Rail system. It handles game day crowds, unless fans block the door.
Like has been said, they got lucky with that Super Bowl. The weather will always be a factor but even more so is the transportation. Leaving MetLife for a regular season Jets/Giants game is a pain in the ass.
Cleveland has talked about putting a dome on the building. It would be really cool to see
Every team stadium should host. I'd love to see a game in the snow. So unfair to the people near Lambeau.
I live 30 minutes from Greenbay… it would realistically be a nightmare. Green Bay is the smallest city to host an NFL team, no major airports near, minimal parking in the stadium, freezing weather (not a negative to me but to some fans they would hate it), i dint even think there is half the hotel space needed. Would be cool asf but realistically it’s impossible.
@@aheinrich2535 Ignore the super picky VIPs and actors. Host it for the fans. True lovers of the game. They will be able to handle the drive to Milwaukee.
You showed Lucas Oil at the beginning but didn't say why it wouldn't host again. Was curious to hear that one.
Same. If I remember correctly, we did a fantastic job hosting that superbowl. So I don't see why we couldn't host another, unless dude is just biased to Indianapolis.
8:00 “nobody visits Philly for tourist reasons”
Literally going there in October for tourist reasons (and week 6 v Tampa) as it’s my first time visiting America and first real vacation in a decade.
it's your first time visiting the united states, and of all of the places in such a vast nation the size of europe, you chose PHILADELPHIA ???
Just remember, not all cities are like Philly. But when youre there you should definitely visit Kensington. It's the nicest part of the city and you will definitely be in absolute awe.
@@katal003 maybe because that’s where the liberty bell is? Also a few other historic things also Rocky? Just thinking of why they would go there
Lmaooo of ALL the places you chose philly? Honestly since youll be on the EC I HIGHLY recommend going to DC. It is BEAUTIFUL and extremely clean. You couldnt have chosen a worst city on the east coast to visit lmao
I would recommend taking a bus or train to Boston and explore the history.. Statehouse is very cool and lots of cool things like Sam Adams Brewery etc..