Kant Philosophy in an Hour (Audiobook)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 ноя 2022
- Philosophy for busy people. Read a succinct account of the philosophy of Kant in just one hour.
Immanuel Kant taught and wrote prolifically about physical geography yet never traveled farther than forty miles from his home in Königsberg. Appropriately, his philosophy strenuously denies that all knowledge is derived from experience, insisting instead that all experience must conform to knowledge. Kant’s aim was to restore metaphysics. According to Kant, space and time are subjective; along with various ‘categories,’ they help us to see the phenomena of the world - though never in its true reality.
Here is a concise, expert account of Kant’s life and philosophical ideas - entertainingly written and easy to understand. Also included are selections from Kant’s work, suggested further reading, and chronologies that place Kant in the context of the broader scheme of philosophy. 
Развлечения
Excellent read and fantastic narrator.
With all of Kant’s routines, social troubles, and strict preferences for how he wanted things to be done in his life, it sounds to me like he might have been autistic. It’s just a shame he discouraged his students from listening to music lest they become “effeminate”. If listening to music is for women, those women surely enjoyed life more than the men who refused to be like them.
It seems all the great minds were either mad, mentally ill, or very eccentric.
@@user-iu6ug5cr9g Wittgenstein was a prime example of this eccentricity. The man seemed positively insufferable.
This is great before I go into 30 hours of Kant in audiobook form I want to see what I'm getting into.
This one hour is all you need.
Thanks
Great video, thank you, note to self(nts) watched all of it 1:22:03
Hilarious, though the sources of his life and work were never going to be able to compete with those of Hegel's, the account of which is the funniest thing ive read since Tom Sharpe.
That’s impressive
An excellent reading and reader! Thank you!
Evolutionaries psychology has done more for the understanding of human nature in the last 30 years then philosophy in 2000 years.
Is psychology not a product of philosophy?
@@comforth3898 Could be. But it still stands. Once we started thinking about things like morality and values from an evolutionary perspective, everything fell into place.
@@JavierBonillaC 'Evolutionary Psychology' rests upon, and is undergirded by, metaphysical presuppositions that it cannot justify. Human 'identity' across time/change, human 'nature', the principle of induction, the ontology of laws of logic, etc. all are transcendental prerequisites to any scientific empirical field like 'Evolutionary Psychology', which only can be justified/grounded through philosophical worldviews and epistemology.
Most evolutionary psychologists don't know anything about epistemology.
@squidwardtennisballs3390 We know almost nothing about epistemology. We don't even know how an idea is create in the brain or how conciousness works. All knowledge about "how we know" comes from pwrceptual experiments.
For example: What percentage of the reality that you perceive comes through your senses? 8%. That's how you form your knowledge.
@@JavierBonillaC 'All knowledge about "how we know" comes from our perceptual experiences'
Does the truth value of that proposition itself, that 'all knowledge comes from perceptual experiences', also come from our perceptual experiences? It doesn't, because truth values, interpretive frameworks, first order and second order principles, axiological value judgements, etc do not come from strict empirical experience, so that is self refuting.
If you had read Quine 'Two Dogmas of Empiricism' you would know this because he makes this exact point about meaning, classes, ontology of numbers, induction, etc. (As an empricist himself)
By the way, what is your perceptual justification for the ontology of the laws of logic? Where can I observe that empirically?
Rubbish
Rubber