Diesel SCR Systems Explained: How to Diagnose and Replace a NOx Sensor

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 23

  • @RepairGeek
    @RepairGeek  2 месяца назад +2

    Links to Parts/Tools used in this video:
    Idash: amzn.to/47gPUls
    Stanadyne Fuel Additive: amzn.to/4eipYbH
    Ammonia Glass Cleaner: amzn.to/4gj2qVG
    Test Light: amzn.to/3AW7j7b
    Oscilloscope: amzn.to/3TjXXsf
    OEM NOx Sensors:
    16-18 2.8 Duramax UPSTREAM: amzn.to/4guAbDV
    16-18 2.8 Duramax DOWNSTREAM: amzn.to/3ASf1iH
    19-22 2.8/3.0 Duramax UPSTREAM: amzn.to/4dZcvpy
    20-23 6.6 Duramax UPSTREAM: amzn.to/3XgdCtx
    20-23 6.6 Duramax DOWNSTREAM: amzn.to/3XfGFO6
    I was not able to find any OEM Ford NOx Sensor on Amazon.
    13-15 6.7 Cummins Downstream: amzn.to/3ZbctWU
    My Amazon Store: www.amazon.com/shop/repairgeek
    Help support the channel, buy using my Amazon links
    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases and your cost is exactly the same.

    • @jordanstaal7238
      @jordanstaal7238 3 дня назад

      What scan tool are you bluetoothing threw your phone?

  • @randyosburn533
    @randyosburn533 2 месяца назад +2

    Best description of NOx and de-rate problems I have ever heard/seen.

  • @jwagner105
    @jwagner105 Месяц назад

    First offer, great video describing the SCR system. I appreciate that I'm not the only one that's against the "just delete it" camp. From what I have learned in a previous job, the most common failure modes of NOx sensors are related to the ceramic components on the inside of the sensor being thermally shocked. Most of the thermal shock would be coming from the water formed in the combustion process for the first sensor and for the second sensor, the water could be also be coming the from the chemical reactions happening in the exhaust catalysts. While I know they have made improvement to the sensors for this, it is also just inherent to the sensors design and function. Some of the risk of failure can be mitigated by good sensor location in the exhaust, but ultimately, the sensor is still being placed in an extremely harsh environment. So the fact that they live as long as they do, is a testament to the amount of engineering and testing that goes into getting these sensors to work in the first place. Again, great video.

  • @Section501K
    @Section501K 2 месяца назад

    Great straight forward explanation of the SCR. I've liked my 2016 Colorado diesel (118k) but more and more issues are popping up. Nice to hear some are running mostly trouble free.

  • @martinhansen8346
    @martinhansen8346 2 месяца назад +1

    Thanks for yet another upload, I'm looking forward to watching it tomorrow morning, as it is late in the day here in Denmark.

  • @Jake19z19
    @Jake19z19 Месяц назад

    Fantastic video you make it so easy to actually understand what is going on keep it up

  • @tomhogland
    @tomhogland 2 месяца назад +2

    As a 2017 2.8 owner (since new), I can confirm "Just delete it" isn't really an option any longer. Basically nobody will sell a delete kit to anyone in the US anymore, not since the EPA started cracking down on them. It isn't worth the multi-million dollar risk to a company to offer them. You *can* get a good aftermarket emissions-compliant tune, though, that will minimize EGR use, which reduces soot/crud in the exhaust and helps the sensor life. Those tunes use more DEF, but DEF is cheap and easy to add. (My tune is from GDE, but DD makes a good one as well.) One major issue is that the emissions-required sensors aren't covered by the emissions warranty, even though a failed sensor shuts everything down. Crazy that the OEMs can just disclaim the sensor coverage and get away with it - I'd love to see the EPA say "if it's required for the emissions, then it's covered". In 7 years I've had one emissions issue - a DEF line heater sensor, had to replace the hose/wire bundle, which cost almost $500. Still cheaper than a new car payment though.

    • @RepairGeek
      @RepairGeek  2 месяца назад

      The number of people that I've seen with a deleted 2.8 that then has some tuning problem like the "keep driving" message appear is staggering. Then they go back to try to get with the tuner only to find the guy has folded up shop and they have no support. Even GDE pulled that stuff 5 years ago when all this started hitting the fan.
      The larger issue that I see in the emissions space is every model year takes a different sensor part number. A 2016 2500 takes a different sensor than a 2017 2500 that is the same body style. There is no economy of scale here. I found a sensor for a cummins that was $625 plus a core charge it fit 2 model years of truck. A NOx sensor for a 16-18 2.8 is $200. The sensor for a 19-22 2.8 also fits a early 3.0 Duramax truck. The late sensor that fits multiple trucks is half the cost.

  • @johnmorrow1628
    @johnmorrow1628 2 месяца назад +2

    In a pinch I have used a hose clamp over the socket and it was just enough to remove a nox sensor.
    In my ship we get in shit for cutting the wires becuase theh usully have a 150$ core charge.
    Torches also help alot.
    When I'm diagnosing a nox. All you can check is power and ground. And if you don't have an ociliscope you can use a volt meter to see if it's getting the CAN signal. CAN low is usually 1.5-2.5 volt and CAN high is 2.5-3.5 volts.
    You measure from CAN high or low to ground.
    In most causes it's a bad sensor

  • @TheBrokenLife
    @TheBrokenLife 2 месяца назад

    I've found those O2 sockets are generally only good for installation. Usually I use a wrench to take them out, or cut the harness like you did, but I have also run hose clamps around the split sockets before if I had to.

  • @spiridondimaris465
    @spiridondimaris465 2 месяца назад

    I agree 100 hundred percent

  • @DaveofAllTrades75
    @DaveofAllTrades75 2 месяца назад +4

    I don’t think the de-rate is the biggest issue people have with these systems and why they delete them the real reason is because whether it’s Chevy Ford or Dodge like you said within certain variations depending on the make and model they recirculate dirty crap out of your exhaust back into usually the number seven and number eight cylinder which even if you’re the most conservative driver on the planet you end up burning up cylinder seven and eight in a lot of cases. The EPA and the manufacturers don’t care about the longevity of these engines they only care what comes out of the tailpipe and you the consumer end up paying the cost of burned up pistons and blown up engines that otherwise could’ve gone a lot more miles.

    • @WarMachine550
      @WarMachine550 2 месяца назад

      You're talking about EGR. Exhaust gas recirculation. It does exactly as you said, make the engine eat what it poops. But EGR technology is far older and more prevalent than SCR systems. Plenty of EGR equipped vehicles do not have SCR. However I've never seen an SCR equipped vehicle WITHOUT EGR.

  • @donniediesel6.789
    @donniediesel6.789 2 месяца назад

    I can relate, the same sensor has gone bad on my Cummins multiple times. Difficult to get at. Def had soot on it and wonder if the soot alone was the problem each time. Yes I used a autozone replacer or sensor, lifetime warranty and has gone bad multiple times.

  • @donniediesel6.789
    @donniediesel6.789 2 месяца назад

    When I bought the autozone sensor at the time it was almost 700 back in 2022

  • @Jake19z19
    @Jake19z19 Месяц назад

    Also people dont talk about the down sides to def

  • @1mandanceparty
    @1mandanceparty 2 месяца назад +1

    19:32 200 bucks for 58,000 miles is .00348828 cents per mile…. Yeah it’s worth it.

    • @RepairGeek
      @RepairGeek  2 месяца назад +1

      Thanks for doing the math!

  • @BadGam3in
    @BadGam3in Месяц назад

    Hose clamp on those cheap amazon sockets would have worked